About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh spoke for conservatives during last Sotomayor nomination, too

June 01, 2009 2:43 pm ET

SUMMARY: Rush Limbaugh's recent attacks against Sonia Sotomayor are not the first time he has gone after the judge or spoken for other conservatives in denouncing her.

11 Comments

In recent days, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh has led conservative attacks against Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, as the May 28 edition of CNN Newsroom noted in its on-screen text:

But this is not the first time that Limbaugh has attacked the judge or spoken for other conservatives in denouncing her. According to The New York Times, Limbaugh criticized Sotomayor's nomination to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals more than a decade ago. The Times reported on June 13, 1998: "On Sept. 30, the day of her confirmation hearing, Rush Limbaugh, the conservative radio talk show host, warned the Senate that Judge Sotomayor was an ultraliberal who was on a 'rocket ship' to the Supreme Court. That day, Judge Sotomayor was questioned closely by Republicans."

The Times further reported:

Senate Republican staff aides said Trent Lott of Mississippi, the majority leader, has agreed to hold up a vote on the nomination as part of an elaborate political calculus; if she were easily confirmed to the appeals court, they said, that would put her in a position to be named to the Supreme Court. And Senate Republicans think that they would then have a difficult time opposing a Hispanic woman who had just been confirmed by the full Senate.

''Basically, we think that putting her on the appeals court puts her in the batter's box to be nominated to the Supreme Court,'' said one senior Republican staff aide who spoke on the condition of anonymity. ''If Clinton nominated her it would put several of our senators in a real difficult position.''

In its July 6, 1998, issue (accessed via nationalreview.com), the National Review asserted that "Judge Sonia Sotomayor, although liberal, would be particularly difficult to oppose since George Bush appointed her. All the more reason to block her elevation, now pending, to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals."

On the May 27 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Limbaugh read from a Hill article that cited the Times, stating, "I had forgotten this. The Hill, Capitol Hill newspaper, recalled that in 1997 I predicted that Sonia Sotomayor was on a 'rocket ship' for the US Supreme Court." He went on to read: "The conservative radio host said, on the day of Sotomayor's confirmation hearing, September 30, 1997, that she was extremely liberal and was on a 'rocket ship' to the high court, according to a 1998 New York Times story on GOP efforts to stop her confirmation."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (June 01, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
      2  
      Well, he was right for once, at least on her ascending to the Supreme Court.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 01, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
      2  
      Rush Limbaugh: "I had forgotten this..."

      Oh, the irony... On perhaps the one occasion that Limbaugh got lucky and was correct in one of his predictions, he forgot about it. Too funny... Then again, I'm sure everything from Rush's heaviest Oycontin days are but a haze to him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (June 01, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
        4
      -- are not the first time he has gone after the judge -- mmfa

      Is this supposed to be some grand revelation by mmfa? Limbaugh conservative in 1998? Still conservative today? Still opposing Sotomayor a decade later?

      This is silliness by mmfa.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 01, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
        2  
        It's good to understand the history. It's part of the story. A silly item by itself perhaps, but a reasonably important part of the bigger picture. (And it's not exactly imflamatory. Rush got part of it right anyway.)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (June 01, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
            1
          I agree that it's not inflammatory and it's always good to understand history...I just have a hard time grasping how Limbaugh opposing Sotomayor 10 years ago and still opposing her today does much of anything for the story today.

          It's hardly "man bites dog"...and mmfa has enough fodder for their anti-Limbaugh schtick without this bit of fluff and silliness.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 01, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
            1  
            Well... I don't think it's part of the "anti-limbaugh" schitck per se... More like demonstrating a pattern of behavior. I actually would have been more surprised if he'd SUPPORTED her 10 years ago - but then, what was i thinking?! The thing is, it was the same BS then that is is now. I mean are you guys seriously that worried about her? Man, I just don't see it. She's the best you'll get. I suggest you take her, and encorage more like her or the next nominee will actually BE a "liberal activist."
            Report Abuse
    • Author by inkslave (June 01, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
      3  
      Amazing. These guys could pass gas all day and night, without ever getting to the issue of whether she is a good judge. It's all labels and spin. What did we do to deserve such a country? Oh, right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (June 01, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
      1  
      "On Sept. 30, the day of her confirmation hearing, Rush Limbaugh, the conservative radio talk show host, warned the Senate that Judge Sotomayor was an ultraliberal who was on a 'rocket ship' to the Supreme Court. That day, Judge Sotomayor was questioned closely by Republicans."

      Even back in 1998 the Reps jumped when Rush said 'Jump.'
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dusaa1975 (June 02, 2009 6:33 am ET)
         
      Good lord, people...are we now attacking Limbaugh because he has the audacity to be consistent??? This seems to be a very silly news scoop.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Reinhard (June 02, 2009 11:05 am ET)
           
        I can't believe Limbaugh can make a statement like " Obama is the greatest living example of a reverse racist..." and that there are people who actually listen to that nonsense. Amazing what a difference one chromosome can make.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (June 02, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
             
          Amazing what a difference one chromosome can make.

          Yes. If the typical dittohead had one more chromosome, they'd have Down's syndrome. :-)
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.