About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox Nation falsely claimed Holder "[s]ays" it's "[r]acist" to only have "[c]itizens [v]oting"

June 02, 2009 7:41 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A Fox Nation headline falsely claimed that Attorney General Eric Holder "[s]ays" it is "[r]acist" to allow only citizens to vote in Georgia. In fact, the AP article Fox Nation linked to made clear that the Justice Department opposes Georgia's voter verification program because it illegally denies some citizens, and disproportionately minorities, the right to vote.

23 Comments

In a June 2 headline, The Fox Nation falsely claimed that Attorney General Eric Holder "[s]ays" it is "[r]acist" to allow only citizens to vote in Georgia. Fox Nation's headline stated: "Georgia Only Wants Citizens Voting ... Holder Says That's Racist." In fact, the June 1 Associated Press article Fox Nation linked to makes clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has not opposed restricting voting to citizens; rather, the AP reported that the DOJ said in a letter that it had rejected Georgia's process after finding that it illegally denies some citizens, and disproportionately minorities, the right to vote.

Loretta King, the acting assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, wrote in the May 29 letter to Georgia's attorney general that under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a change in Georgia election law can be approved only if it " 'neither has the purpose nor will have the effect' of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color or membership in a language minority group."

King wrote that a DOJ analysis found that Georgia's process "frequently subjects a disproportionate number of African-American, Asian and/or Hispanic voters to additional, and more importantly, erroneous burdens on the right to register to vote" and that "[t]housands of citizens who are in fact eligible to vote under Georgia law have been flagged" as ineligible under the system. King concluded that the Justice Department's analysis found that the state's verification process "does not produce accurate and reliable information" and that "the impact of these errors falls disproportionally on minority voters" and thus rejected the state's procedures.

The Fox Nation's June 2 headline:

foxnation1

From the June 1 AP article that The Fox Nation linked to:

The Justice Department has rejected Georgia's system of using Social Security numbers and driver's license data to check whether prospective voters are citizens, a process that was a subject of a federal lawsuit in the weeks leading up to November's election.

In a letter released on Monday, the Justice Department said the state's voter verification program is frequently inaccurate and has a "discriminatory effect" on minority voters. The decision means Georgia must halt the citizenship checks, although the state can still ask the Justice Department to reconsider, according to the letter and to the Georgia secretary of state's office.

"This flawed system frequently subjects a disproportionate number of African-American, Asian and/or Hispanic voters to additional, and more importantly, erroneous burdens on the right to register to vote," Loretta King, acting assistant attorney general of the Justice Department's civil rights division, said. King's letter was sent to Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker on Friday.

The decision comes as Georgia awaits word on whether a law passed in the spring that requires newly registering voters to show proof of citizenship will pass muster with DOJ. Under the law that takes effect in January, people must show their proof up front compared to doing checks through databases.

A three-judge federal panel in October ordered the state to seek Justice Department preclearance for the checks under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the same reason the federal agency must sign off on the new law that made Georgia only the second state after Arizona to require such proof. Georgia is one of several states that need federal approval before changing election rules because of a history of discriminatory Jim Crow-era voting practices.

[...]

Justice Department officials said the citizenship match through driver's license and Social Security data has flagged 7,007 individuals as non-citizens but that many have been shown to be in error.

"Thousands of citizens who are in fact eligible to vote under Georgia law have been flagged," the Justice Department letter said.

The Justice Department decision marks the first time the new Democratic Obama administration has weighed in on Georgia's election laws. It is also the first time the Justice Department has rejected a change in election procedures by Georgia since the 1990s, according to a spokesman for the Georgia attorney general.

From King's May 29 letter to Baker:

letter1

[...]

letter2

letter3

letter4

letter5

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by anotheramerican (June 02, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
        5
      Again MMFA only shows one side of the story.

      Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel issued the following statement following the U.S. Department of Justice’s denial of preclearance of Georgia’s voter verification process:


      “...It is important to underscore that not a single person has come forward to say he or she could not vote because of the verification process. Further, while DOJ argues that the process is somehow discriminatory, the historic voter turnout among Hispanic and African-American voters in the 2008 general elections clearly says otherwise..."

      I only cut out a part of the letter. If you want to read it in its entirety see:
      http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/02/holder-undermines-georgias-voter-verification-rules-acorn-cheers/

      ps. Solon, You don't have to like Malkin to read Handel's letter.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (June 02, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
        4
      Again MMFA only shows one side of the story.

      Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel issued the following statement following the U.S. Department of Justice’s denial of preclearance of Georgia’s voter verification process:


      “...It is important to underscore that not a single person has come forward to say he or she could not vote because of the verification process. Further, while DOJ argues that the process is somehow discriminatory, the historic voter turnout among Hispanic and African-American voters in the 2008 general elections clearly says otherwise..."

      I only cut out a part of the letter. If you want to read it in its entirety see:
      http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/02/holder-undermines-georgias-voter-verification-rules-acorn-cheers/

      ps. Solon, You don't have to like Malkin to read Handel's letter.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (June 02, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
        1 2
        sorry about the double post. Why it happened, I do not know.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (June 02, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
          4  
          Solon aside, how many people here would provide traffic to Malkin's website?
          Could not find a better url, could you?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (June 02, 2009 10:42 pm ET)
            3  
            Even the drunken Subic Bay sailor residing inside me is not enough to make me want to read any of Michelle Malkin's crap.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (June 02, 2009 11:11 pm ET)
              2  
              Ah good ole good ole SubicBay. In its time one of the ranking armpits of the world. That Island (Treasure Island?) in the bay was nice though.
              (X)VP sailor
              Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (June 03, 2009 11:18 am ET)
              2
            my4cents,

            The letter was printed in its entirety in the Malkin url. That is why I posted it. After a brief search I did not find any other link with the full transcript.

            I find it laughable that some here seem to take it as a source of pride that they will not consider a link because they often disagree with source. Gotta love that open minded liberalism!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (June 03, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
                 
              What bearing does it have on the claim that Holder "says it's racist"?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (June 03, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
                 
              Not as much as I LOVE that simpleminded conservatism. One of the problems with the internet is if you read say a book it has a bibliography you can FIND wwhat their sources are. On the web if you cant trust the source then it is a waste of TIME to read them. You dont KNOW if they changed anything you dont KNOW if they misrepresented it. We GET that you dont really CARE if its true or not as long as it says what you want to hear buth Malkin is a proven LIAR. Why would I waste anytime reading anything on her blog HOPING it was accurate? I have PERSONALLY watched the woman lie on TV. She doesnt have any credibility thus neither does her blog. If you cant FIND credible source maybe that should tell you something.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 03, 2009 7:34 am ET)
          2  
          sorry about the double post. Why it happened, I do not know.
          It happened because there was too much stupid in it to fit in just one post.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 02, 2009 9:53 pm ET)
      1  
      Its also important to read the information befor posting AA. Try it sometime.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 02, 2009 11:24 pm ET)
      2  
      I've got a sort of off topic question.

      Does Malkin actually ever WRITE anything? It seems she's more in the mold of posting other people's writings, and links to other stories. Does she have an original thought in her scary brain?

      I thought not...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hongdb (June 03, 2009 7:21 am ET)
           
        Scary? You bet. One should read what she HAS written (her original "scholarship," as it were): Racial profiling is okey-doke--hell! It's too little and too late: on 9-12-01, we should have rounded-up all the Ay-rabs (which, in her world, as in the majority of benighted r-wingers, includes Persians) and interned them. Yes. Internment, as in what St. Frankie did to honest, patriotic Japanese-American citizens for the duration.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 03, 2009 7:36 am ET)
          2  
          One should read what she HAS written
          No.

          One shouldn't.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (June 03, 2009 10:38 am ET)
             
          I know her to be a McCarthy apologist as well.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by don_Gabacho (June 03, 2009 7:46 pm ET)
         
      "This flawed system frequently subjects a disproportionate number of African-American, Asian and/or Hispanic voters to additional, and more importantly, erroneous burdens on the right to register to vote," Loretta King, acting assistant attorney general of the Justice Department's civil rights division, said. King's letter was sent to Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker on Friday."

      Without having investigated the flaw in the system frequently "subjecting African-America, Asian and/or Hispanic voters to additionally and more importantly, erroneous burdens on the right to register to vote"?

      As early as October, both the Secretary of State (Republican) and Attorney General (Democrat) of Georgia, with full and indisputable evidence, were informed of Mexican government functionaries registering voters for U.S. elections in Georgia.

      (The information and evidence accompanied a complaint; and is supposedly "still be investigated".}

      Most apparently as an adjunct to Bill Richardson's "Moving America Forward" "Latino Voter Registration Drive" project as locally sponsored by the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials.

      Aside from the very opening line of the U.S. Constitution stating "We the People of the U.S. to form a more perfect union..." and not "We the People of the U.S. and Mexican Government to form a more perfect union...," just who would the Mexican Government functionaries be just as "proportionately" targeting for its voter registrations for U.S. elections if not the same groups that had been flagged?

      I am presuming for that the U.S. Department of Justice was never informed of the evidences long held by the State of Georgia government.

      If so, they are about to find out.





      Report Abuse