About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity crops clip to claim Obama "decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice" in Cairo speech

June 04, 2009 10:35 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Sean Hannity edited a clip of President Obama's speech in Cairo to claim that Obama "decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice on the world stage." In fact, the context of Obama's words makes clear that Obama was condemning those who would "justify the events of 9-11."

105 Comments

On the June 4 edition of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity stated that in his June 4 speech in Cairo, President Obama "decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice on the world stage," then aired a cropped video clip of Obama saying, "I am aware that there are still some that would question or even justify the events of 9-11." However, the context of Obama's comments makes clear that Obama was condemning those who would "justify the events of 9-11"; immediately following the clip Hannity showed, Obama stated:

But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

Media Matters for America has documented a pattern in which Fox News hosts and correspondents -- including Hannity -- have on dozens of occasions cropped comments by progressives and Democratic political figures in a manner that misrepresents them.

From Obama's speech:

The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms.

In Ankara, I made clear that America is not -- and never will be -- at war with Islam. (Applause.) We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security -- because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women, and children. And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals, and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice; we went because of necessity. I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

From the June 4 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: He went on to imply to the foreign audience in Cairo that the U.S. is a nation that tortures.

OBAMA [video clip]: I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.

HANNITY: He also decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice on the world stage.

OBAMA [video clip]: I am aware that there are still some that would question or even justify the events of 9-11.

HANNITY: And throughout the speech, Mr. Obama spoke out of both sides of his mouth. He said on Iraq that he's glad that Saddam is gone, but then he added this caveat. Listen to this.

OBAMA [video clip]: Iraq was a war of choice.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by progressivepirate (June 04, 2009 11:15 pm ET)
      7 2
      What the hell? This must be stopped, but how? They don't even care anymore.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (June 04, 2009 11:27 pm ET)
      14 1
      What a fick suck. This reminds me of how he was going around saying that Howard Dean "advanced the theory" that 9/11 was an inside job. In reality, Dean had simply said that the Bush administration's secrecy and obstructionism regarding the 9/11 commission was giving more credibility to 9/11 conspiracy theorists.

      This guy knows no shame. It would be more painful if he and all the other cons out there are now irrelevant.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 7:50 am ET)
        9 1
        Hannity makes me wish stupidity were painful, so he would have some incentive to wise up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (June 05, 2009 11:19 am ET)
          6 1
          Or lying caused severe, chronic, untreatable rectal itch. That would work, too.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Missouri Democrat (June 05, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
          5  
          Easy he makes me wish stupidity was criminal then he would be locked up for the rest of his natural life.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by cmiller442 (June 05, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
        7 1
        One might like to ask Sean how that waterboarding for charity went.

        Oh that's right, he never intended to be waterboarded. He was simply talking out both sides of his mouth.

        Believe it or not, Hannity and the rest of Fox Nonsense Crew are the best thing that ever happened to President Obama and the absolute WORST thing for the failing and flailing Real-thuglicans.

        The people had their say on whether we still support this "down in the mud" politics and we overwhelmingly voted against it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pags2 (June 05, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
          7  
          I would have flown to NY just to see Hannity waterboarded.

          I agree that Hannity, et al, are the best thing for the Dems. They are so far over the line that they will be lucky if they don't lose more seats in 2010. I am sure that the Dems can use him and Limbaugh for the next elections. If their statements were juxtaposed with Obama's actual statements for a tv ad, it would hammer home how far right the neocons have moved thereby deserving the title radical right.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 12:58 am ET)
          2  
          Super comment! "Real-Thuglicans," I love it. Mark Twain reportedly said "any fool can spell correctly; it takes real imagination to mispell a word. :)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (June 05, 2009 12:47 am ET)
      13 1
      Sean Hannity is truly a hater. Plain and simple. You can have a show and boast lies for ratings but when you maliciously critize a 'wartime President' you are a traitor.
      Mr. Hannity has been lying for years.
      I believe that he should be stopped(using the words of Rush and the rest of the Anti-American commentators).
      Mr. Hannity is again talking about invigorating the party because of his cirlce-jerk interview with Rush..he also brought up Rev. Wright, Bill Ayres etc.
      Hannity must be stopped by any means...nothing violent of course.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by abdul (June 05, 2009 1:52 am ET)
          15
        Apparently you haven't witnessed the hateful vomit that spews from the the mouth of Keith Oberman every night. Now there's hate in the ultimate.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (June 05, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
          10  
          Olberman doesn't spew hate. You are exercising the fallacy of false equivalency. Being passionate and animated doesn't equal "hate". Hate equals hate.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 10:27 pm ET)
          5 1
          Apparently you haven't witnessed the hateful vomit that spews from the the mouth of Keith Oberman
          Who is this "Keith Oberman?" I can't seem to find any references to him.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:07 am ET)
            1  
            From 71-year old geezer: i'm in the DFW area. Channel 215 on AT&T UVERSE.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:12 am ET)
          1  
          I'm a 71-year old geezer old enough to know better than to think that there is an honest politician but young enough to appreciate facts presented in a studied intellectual fashion as Mr. Olbermann does. Carry on Keith!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jamesjaxmassage (June 05, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
          8
        Um...
        "when you maliciously critize a 'wartime President' you are a traitor." ???
        Does that mean all the Liberals and Democrats were traitors during the ENTIRETY of the Bush presidency?

        When I see the cropped clip, I get the same meaning. I don't think that's what Hannity was referring to.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (June 05, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
          6  
          Ok James, pay attention here. I know it's impossible to detect inflection in tone, but if Princeofwheels could have spoken this instead of written it, it may have been much clearer.

          First, do you remember the last eight years? Do you remember Hannity explaining that "the left," who was criticizing Bush during war-time, were unamerican? I sure do, because I listen to him every day.

          Second, Liberals and Democrats were not the only ones criticizing President Bush during his years in office. There are many noted Conservatives who spoke out against the occupation of Iraq, specifically Andrew Sullivan of the Atlantic, and Ron Paul, just to name a few. Of course, to keep the party pure, the Republicans have all but expelled them from the ranks for purity's sake.

          Finally, when you say "When I see the cropped clip, I get the same meaning. I don't think that's what Hannity was referring to," I seriously hope you don't mean that you get the same point that Hannity tries to make. I mean, that's why it's a cropped clip, for heaven's sakes. It doesn't take into account THE FOLLOWING SUCCESSIVE SENTENCES. This is the same problem that happened with the Sotomayor "Latina woman" cropped quote. Hardly anyone, especially on cable news, showed the paragraph before it, or the paragraph after it, which put the quote in context and was the same point Alito had made before.

          But really, I just hope you didn't mean that.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:02 am ET)
           
        Your sentiments are appreciated by this 71-year old geezer; however, Many of my family members and friends have died in numerous wars to support freedom of speech--even hateful speech.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (June 05, 2009 12:51 am ET)
      10 2
      I think that a love affair is developing between Seannie and the Druggie. Sounds like a sitcom for MSNBC.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (June 05, 2009 2:14 am ET)
        5 2
        The Sod Squad
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 7:52 am ET)
          7 2
          Valley of the Oxy-Dolls...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (June 05, 2009 9:00 am ET)
            6 2
            Latrine Acres
            (okay, my age is showing ;-)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by neon desert (June 05, 2009 9:35 am ET)
              8 2
              Jerk and the Fatman
              Report Abuse
              • Author by neon desert (June 05, 2009 10:25 am ET)
                11 2

                • Love Great American Style
                • My Three Chins
                • Petty-dope Junction
                • Habit and Costello
                • Two-and-a-half Stooges
                • Hanniturd and Scum
                • Different Strokers
                • The Fox of Life
                • The A-hole Team
                • CHumPs
                • Dork and Windy
                • Max Headwound
                • The Simpletons

                Report Abuse
                • Author by seeryer (June 05, 2009 10:30 am ET)
                  9 1
                  I like 2 and a half man.

                  Rush is the 2 men (waist wise) and Sean is the half man (brain wise).
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by nerzog (June 05, 2009 11:14 am ET)
                  7 2
                  Jerk and the Fatman gets my vote.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 10:31 pm ET)
                  7 1
                  The Moneyhoovers.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:21 am ET)
                       
                    71-year old geezer quotes PEPSI commercial for Pepsi MAX
                    that briefly flourished in the DFW area late last year:
                    (drink pepsi max) and look your cojones in the eye :)
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:17 am ET)
                     
                  71-year old geezer respectfully adds: General Horsepital
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Conchobhar (June 05, 2009 10:12 am ET)
              3 1
              Ditto for the other three of us.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Conchobhar (June 05, 2009 10:13 am ET)
                2 1
                Above in reply to Mary.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (June 05, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
                  5  
                  We get to share the senior award, but Neon gets the grand prize...a week's vacation to Hannity Island with Mr. Roarke.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by neon desert (June 05, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
                    5  
                    Gee, Mary. You don't have to get sadistic about it.

                    C'mon, I mean, if you think about it, "Habit and Costello" was not so bad.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mary59 (June 06, 2009 9:45 am ET)
                      1  
                      Just funnin' ya, Neon. You got me laughing out loud with that list.
                      And I think that the very polite Mr. Roarke would flee a Hannity Island, as would any former movie star special guests ;-)

                      Limbaugh gets the booby prize of 12 months at Hannity Island. And, the tv crew removes all the wait staff.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by Missouri Democrat (June 05, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
                    5  
                    Mary what did Neon ever do to you to make him suffer that fate!?! I like Neon he's one of the most intelligent here, present company excepted, but then again I like all of you "damn libs".
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 10:33 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Second prize was two weeks, so the grand prize is much better.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:15 am ET)
                 
              71-year old geezer sez: Feces of the male bovine would "cover" the subject in question quite well, :)
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:11 am ET)
           
        71-year old geezer sez: boo, hiss :}
        Report Abuse
    • Author by buckeyekarl8288 (June 05, 2009 1:10 am ET)
      8 1
      Hannity is the most un-American shizz for brains on the Right.

      Why does Fox "news" Entertainment and Made Up Crap channel not get called out by the so-called "liberal" media?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:28 am ET)
           
        71-year old geezer sez: Oh but they do buckeye. Here in the DFW area we have channel 215 on AT&T UVERSE, which carries a wonderful and quotidian array of liberal lip-sticks (to coin a phrase) consisting of Morning Joe; The Ed Show; Chris Matthews; Keith Olbermann; and (in my humble opinion) the young but venerable Rachel Maddow.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (June 05, 2009 7:19 am ET)
      10 1
      this is obviously another one of their clear and deliberate distortions. and when people hear things like this and do not hear the other side, then it's just adding to the "apology" myth that fox and conservatives are building. it's ok to criticize obama, or any politician, but it has to be done with at least an attempt to present the argument fairly. this is not fair and it's being done on purpose. the white house needs to demand an apology and correction on this. obama did not say what hannity said, but the opposite. it's time to call their hand on this continuing pattern.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:34 am ET)
           
        71-year old geezer sez: My sainted grandmother used to say: "la verdad es como el mais--sola sale" or in plain ole English: Truth is like planted corn--it comes up by itself. Besides, mefirst, to Quote the Man in Black in the Movie The Princess Bride: "Where is it written that life is 'fair?'". Not to engage in too heavy a constitutinal lecture [my old constitution could not stand it] but the first amendment to the Constitution does (among other things) give US citizens the freedom of speech--even unfair speech.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (June 05, 2009 8:07 am ET)
      8 1
      HANNITY: And throughout the speech, Mr. Obama spoke out of both sides of his mouth. He said on Iraq that he's glad that Saddam is gone, but then he added this caveat. Listen to this.

      OBAMA [video clip]: Iraq was a war of choice.

      It would seem to me that you can say you're glad Saddam is gone and that the invasion wasn't warranted at the same time. There are plenty of people around the world we don't care much for, but that doesn't justify overthrowing their governments.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 05, 2009 8:12 am ET)
        9 1
        What he fails to note is that indeed, Iraq WAS a war of choice.

        Saddam posed no threat, to anyone in the region. He certainly posed no threat to the US overall. He had no WMDs as inspections were proving out. Bush didn't allow enough time for inspections to be completed, or to keep going. The evidence that he was hiding WMDs wasn't there. Which is WHY we invaded Iraq in the first place. It wasn't to "free" the Iraqi people. Bush and Co made that one up after we didn't find anything to warrant the invasion.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:54 am ET)
             
          71-year old geezer sez Truly, hindsight is 20/20. And, if I may ask, Magnolia, what position did you espouse back in '83? Whose word were you believing? The retired military brass trotted out by the administration to promote the war or the Senators who actually went on record opposing the War, among them a young Senator from Illinois by the name of Barack Obama?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 1:50 am ET)
           
        71-year old geezer sez: Really. History shows that United States foreign policy has consistently erred on the side of, how'd you put it?
        "overthrowing governments," viz: Jackson's invasion of Florida (then Spanish governed territory in the early 1800's; The so-called Spanish American War so manfully executed by then Colonel Teddy Roosevelt and his famous charge up San Juan Hill. Cuba, at the time, was governed by Spain. How about the CIA intervention in the '30's in Iraq that actually brought down the existing government and ultimately ended up bringing (irony of ironies) Sadaam Hussein. Subsequently, how about US
        unqualified support of the Cuban Dictator Batista, which (irony of ironies) resulted in the coming to power of a young idealist Fidel Castro on New Year's day, 1959. We're still enjoying the fruits of that jewel of American Foreign Policy. That baby happened on the Watch of our 34th (republican) President, General Eisenhower, who was succeeded by a young and popular Democrat, our 35th President (a Democrat) who continued the same policies of his predecessor. Justify??
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mfinn7314 (June 05, 2009 8:13 am ET)
      7 1
      Hannity has does this kind of stuff so many times that it's just his SOP. It is pure dishonesty to knowingly mischaracterize someone's statements. He's supposedly a practicing Catholic. Well, I am one and I know this repeated dishonesty is very wrong. That's my nice way of putting it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by placitasroy (June 05, 2009 8:20 am ET)
      7 1
      Just agreeing that the Fox sucks doesn't do a damn bit of good. I'd love to hear some ideas on how to EFFECTIVELY convince may 1 out of 4 Foxholes how deceptive, dishonest, and dangerous the propaganda is. They are in such deep denial it is like working with cult members.

      Thank God for Mediamatters.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 05, 2009 9:30 am ET)
        8 1
        Just send them to this website. That should solve the problem, although, I'm sure they won't believe what is posted here, after Bill O has talked about the "smear" merchants of MMFA.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pags2 (June 05, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
          8  
          The way to get the people who watch Fox is to have prominent moderates in Congress and the press that call these "news" people out on their lies and distortions. This forces the Fox people to respond on the air to these attacks. Just consider how much time O'Reilly has spent talking about Tiller. Each second they have to defend their statements, takes away time for them to spew more lies. Their viewers get to see all the reasonable people who are taking Fox to task. These statements from moderates must be made on a daily basis to keep Fox commentators on the defensive every day of the week.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 2:04 am ET)
               
            71-year old geezer sez: My sister-in-law, who shall remain nameless visited our home a couple of weeks ago. My greeting to her was: "Well, how do you feel about our new American President?"
            "Oh, we're Republicans," she replied huffily. My point. Years ago there was a commercial being aired on TV for some goofy product or other which stated: "20 million American's can't be wrong." I told you that to tell you this: 20 million is virtually the exact number of Americans who currently admit to being Republicans!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 2:00 am ET)
           
        71-year old geezer sez: Enough of the First Amendment already! An adage in my culture (Spanish) sez: "lo tonto no tiene cura.", loosely translated into English: There is no chre for foolishness.
        Right recently, as the saying goes here in Texas, a writer to our local wipe observed: "There is no cure for stupidity." Question: Are we going to discus these matters on a higher, above-the-fray plane, or are we going to descend to the opposition's level and call them names?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (June 05, 2009 8:46 am ET)
      10 1
      At what point can We the People finally say that enough is enough and take back our media from the clutches of corporate scum.

      We did it by making the Republicans a minority party in the government(okay, I admit that many Dems are not much better than the Republicans... but I digress)

      Fox-Noise is NOT NEWS!! I dare anyone to prove me wrong that Fox is nothing more than a mouth-piece for corporate interests, right-wing ideology, and the bought and paid for Republican (minority) party!

      Oh... and remember that Fox is the only 'media' that actually went to court to demand the right to LIE to their viewers!

      As for Sean Hannity - He is the dumbest SOB on TV and radio... EVER!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 05, 2009 9:40 am ET)
        10 1
        I share your frustration. Since the First Amendment protects FOX from government action, it is up to the other Media Outlets and the public to counter their poison. MSNBC is doing it to some degree, but we need someone with serious credibility to call them to the carpet. Sixty Minutes, maybe? I don't know.

        FOX's competitors, for the most part, seem content with the status quo. I think it would take a massive boycott of advertisers to get their attention, since profit seems to be the only thing that motivates these companies.

        Unless Edward R. Murrow is reincarnated and starts a serious news network, I don't hold out much hope for our diminishing Free Press.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (June 05, 2009 11:52 am ET)
          8 1
          I completely agree. I think Fox (and the other Murdoch instruments) will never change their tune because it is absolutely vital to them and to the neocons for whom they speak that people don't know the truth about what is going on. The only way to hit back is in their wallets, and I don't think that many advertisers will pull ads even in the face of flagrant lying.

          IMHO, investigative journalism is all but dead, and that's a bad thing. We need an independent press, not beholden to either side, but news corporations themselves are huge companies and do not seem interested in digging up actual facts anymore, only in ratings.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (June 05, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
            9 1
            I think you're right about investigative journalists. I guess there are a few still working at Newspapers, but we see where that is headed.

            Sixty Minutes does a little bit of it, but they seem reluctant to do any follow up, or push a story relentlessly until something gets done.

            Really, the only investigative reporters left are writing books, which is good, but people have to buy books and put some effort into reading them. They just don't reach the larger public like TV and radio do.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 2:14 am ET)
                 
              71-year-old geezer sez: see above reply to historygeek.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 2:13 am ET)
               
            71-year old geezer strongly disagees with your second paragraph, historygeek: Suggestion: Quit watching TV (I've always contended that it rots the brain) and check out The Huffington Post online; Rolling Stone Magazine, Bill Maher when he's on, although he's actually on HBO, which qualifies as TV. Anyway, again online: Politico and Air America on radio. Want more, lemme know. :)
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 2:08 am ET)
             
          71-year old geezer sez: Above comments extremely interesting. Question: Do y'all's TV's not have on/off switches?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 05, 2009 9:32 am ET)
      7 1
      What's goofy here is that even out oif context the quote isn't THAT BAD. If this is the best/worst they can do, Obama's got another four years in da baaag.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 2:16 am ET)
           
        71-year-old geezer sez: Right on Bro! But seriously, Obama is the Star. All the rest of the Demos are not that much better than the GOP stalwarts.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 05, 2009 9:43 am ET)
      6 1

      This is such a ham-handed distortion that it's embarrassing to watch.

      The sad thing is that Conservatives do have a valid point of view on many issues, and deserve to be heard. Unfortunately, they've put themselves in the hands of professional liars like Sean Hanniterd and Boss Hogg Limpdog, and they end up looking stupid.


      Report Abuse
      • Author by seeryer (June 05, 2009 10:37 am ET)
        6  
        What is sad is that Conservatives feel Rush and Sean are their best spokesmen. Obama gives a speech in the heart of the Middle East. Ballsy from both the right and the left and the two biggest stalwarths of conservatism absolutely are afraid to have an honest discussion about what Obama said in a 55 MINUTE SPEECH. They break that down into 5, 10 second sound bites which represent less than 2 percent of what he really said. It is a shame that these two pretty much set the agenda for how one political party responds.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pasteve (June 05, 2009 9:45 am ET)
      2  
      I'm waiting for Sean to air a clip of Obama stammering "...Sweet...sweet can..."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (June 05, 2009 10:27 am ET)
      7  
      Does Allan Colmes have the testes to call out Sean for his complete and utter falsehoods he is advancing daily? I mean, at some point Colmes needs to become a man and rise up like he never would when he was on the show. Call Hannity out on his blogs for his attempt to manipulate his audience with these horrible edit jobs. His edit job on Obama saying "This is not a Christian nation" and then "we would be one of the largest Muslim nations" was so dishonest and so unfair and utterly contemptible and Juan Williams just played along the other night. Juan Williams makes me puke more than Sean Hannity.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 05, 2009 11:11 am ET)
        6  
        I think Colmes has been relegated to the trash heap of Talk Show obscurity. Even his mewling objections were too much for Hanniterd to handle, so he "quit"..... or so they say.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seeryer (June 05, 2009 11:58 am ET)
          4  
          Alan may be a self loathing liberal. He married Monica Crowley's sister for cripes sake. Good luck at those family gatherings.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 05, 2009 11:15 am ET)
        8  
        Allan Colmes is a wimp. He was the stereotypical liberal, from the conservative point of view. I hated him almost as much as Hannity back in the day, because he was either a total sell out, or had no balls at all. Possibly both.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (June 05, 2009 11:28 am ET)
          6  
          Joe Conason said on a talk show that he had been considered for that job in the beginning. The fact that they chose Colmes over Conason is evidence that they were never interested in anything resembling "fair and balanced". Conason would have reduced Hanniterd to a quivering mass of jelly.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ex-punk (June 06, 2009 1:13 am ET)
            3  
            I saw Conason on Hannity once and that is exactly what he did. He spit fired facts at Sean, who ended up putting his head down and covered his ears and they turned the camera on the bewildered Colmes. I never even thought Colmes was liberal, just a centrist conservative.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by seeryer (June 05, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
          5  
          Agree 100%. I much rather see a foaming mouth conservative on TV than a soft liberal who can't win an argument.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by manofmystique (June 07, 2009 9:05 pm ET)
        1  
        Taking Colmes off the show proves FoxNews isn't really interested in "fair and balanced". All we are left with is Sean's wicked apin on Fox so-called News.
        Sean is a dangerous man. He knowingly attacks Obama orally, hoping to lead someone to do harm to Obama physically.This is what motivates Hannity. This kind of talk led to the assasination of jfk and mlk and the recent abortion doctor, which we can credit Bill O'Reilly with. Bill created the environment that led a man to commit murder. Bill claim to be an intelligent man, but doesn't understand he has a responsiblity for the things that comes out of his mouth.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by tinka (June 05, 2009 10:58 am ET)
      5  
      I just want to let you know why I will not be watching Good Morning America.....

      It his the people, such as Sean Hannity! Read what he had to say!
      Dispicable!

      Hannity is not a go to person if you want logical perspective.

      I'll be watching CBS for now!

      Hannity crops clip to claim Obama "decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice" in Cairo speech
      June 04, 2009 10:35 pm ET

      On the June 4 edition of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity stated that in his June 4 speech in Cairo, President Obama "decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice on the world stage," then aired a cropped video clip of Obama saying, "I am aware that there are still some that would question or even justify the events of 9-11." However, the context of Obama's comments makes clear that Obama was condemning those who would "justify the events of 9-11"; immediately following the clip Hannity showed, Obama stated:

      But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

      Media Matters for America has documented a pattern in which Fox News hosts and correspondents -- including Hannity -- have on dozens of occasions cropped comments by progressives and Democratic political figures in a manner that misrepresents them.

      From Obama's speech:

      The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms.

      In Ankara, I made clear that America is not -- and never will be -- at war with Islam. (Applause.) We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security -- because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women, and children. And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.

      The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals, and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice; we went because of necessity. I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

      From the June 4 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

      HANNITY: He went on to imply to the foreign audience in Cairo that the U.S. is a nation that tortures.

      OBAMA [video clip]: I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.

      HANNITY: He also decided to give 9-11 sympathizers a voice on the world stage.

      OBAMA [video clip]: I am aware that there are still some that would question or even justify the events of 9-11.

      HANNITY: And throughout the speech, Mr. Obama spoke out of both sides of his mouth. He said on Iraq that he's glad that Saddam is gone, but then he added this caveat. Listen to this.

      OBAMA [video clip]: Iraq was a war of choice.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by daleski22 (June 05, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
      5  
      I think of FOX NEWS as an insidious contagion that, since Obama's election, has mutated into a super virus, but so far has been contained to only 20 percent of the population. People like Hannity and O'Reilly and Beck are the "Patient Zeros" who go around breathing and spewing their deadly disease.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (June 05, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
        4  
        Don't forget about Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and Hal Turner (who is Sean Hannity's good friend).

        If you don't know the last named... he is a Neo-Nazi hate filled un-American scumbag who's entire website/blog is so despicable, it is impossible to comprehend when one has a brain that works! Hal Turner was arrested the other day for explicitly threatening the lives of elected officials from Connecticut. He also threatened the lives of three (Reagan appointed) federal judges in Chicago.

        Our problem in this country is much more than Fox-Noise... they are simply the biggest fish... there are plenty of little fishes out there more than willing to aid in the total destruction of this country.

        Hal Turner has an audience of only 40,000 or so... any one of which can easily and based on some of the comments I read at his sick website more than willing to do another Tim McVeigh to satiate their lust for hate and to prove their ignorance.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 05, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
          5  
          No doubt the little ones are worse on a personal level, but FOX too often gives the small fry a big stage.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pam95650 (June 05, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
      7  
      Fox news is the equivalent to supermarket tabloids.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by brady (June 05, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
        5  
        Fox News is to the news business what World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) is to sports -- a bunch of guys shouting lies into their microphones and threatening anyone opposing them. And a good percentage of those who watch this masquerade believe every word.

        President Obama, saying why he doesn't watch any of the cable news shows, compared cable news to the WWF (he meant WWE), and cited the "scripted" nature of comments being made by both sides. He was being too kind. Fox depends on either the ignorance of its viewers or their blind allegiance. That's what helped give us eight years of Bush and a colossal mess.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ceadog (June 05, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
        12
      So this is where the blind hang out!!! When are you people gonna wake up realize what this administration is doing to America. They are raping you of your retirement and your childrens retirement, they are bashing our military in open media and in forign countries. As for Iraq there was an agreement signed at the end of the Gulf war that we would not go into Iraq as long as Saddam disclosed all of his WMD. As you will remember time after time the UN inspectors who were sent into Iraq to verify that WMD were expelled from the country on numerous occasions and in fact were unable to varify the status of his arsenal. This fact alone authorized the USA and it's Allies to enter the Iraq and finish the job. (no weapons were found true but that does not mean that he did not have them, just try asking the Kerds that he killed with has WMD.)

      And how soon you forget the way you felt after 9/11.... Turn off your liberal left media stations and get a clue people. The world is not all roses. And don't try to blame the Bush administration for the hate. G.H.W.B did more for the Muslims in this world than any other President in history. Our war is not with the middle east just those occupants that seek to do this country harm.


      I am ashamed to hear the comments from the people on this site. Are you sure that you are in fact Americans.

      How does it feel that in the very near future all of your tax dollars will go to CHINA, to pay for You need to open your eyes. We do not have a money tree growing behind the white house to pay for this administration.

      If you think for one second that your taxes are not going to increase you are in for a rude awakining.

      I know that my views will fall on deaf ears here so please don't bother to respond because I won't be back here anyway.

      You go ahead and back a Person that will sell us out to the highest bidder, your rougher days are ahead of you.

      And in closing I would just like to know if you have seen B.O's legitamate Birth Certificate???
      Report Abuse
      • Author by brady (June 05, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
        7  
        No, I haven't seen Bill O'Reilley's legitimate birth certificate.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (June 05, 2009 5:09 pm ET)
        9  
        What you should be ashamed of is that post. It was a golden oldies of delusional fantasies. You are brainwashed. You are so programmed you make Pavlovs dogs look free spirits. Feel free to be one of the cells in the Limborg hivemind but I hope you realize when you spew idiocy this vintage on THIS site where most of the liberals are pretty bright and well informed all you have managed to do is give us all a good laugh

        The birth certificate. Oh my. That IS a good one. The only thing missing are the red nose and oversize shoes.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thelittlethings (June 05, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
          3  
          Solon, I love your posts. :)

          Oh also, "Feel free to be one of the cells in the Limborg hivemind but I hope you realize when you spew idiocy this vintage on THIS site where most of the liberals are pretty bright and well informed all you have managed to do is give us all a good laugh."

          So true! I really did laugh at ceadog's post! Lol

          P.S. ceadog, Obama was born in Hawaii. Also, if the president had been white, would you be questioning his (or her) birth certificate? White people come from all over the world too.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Thinker (June 05, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
        4  
        Good one! You ARE a liberal pretending to be a Whight Wing Wacko RIGHT?!?!You ARE just screwing around RIGHT? You've got those idiots down to a tee! Same old crap that spews out of all of their mouths. Isn't it crazy to think that there are morons out there that believe that? Especially one that would sign up to expose his idiocrasy...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 05, 2009 6:50 pm ET)
        5  
        And in closing I would just like to know if you have seen B.O's legitamate Birth Certificate???


        I started to reply, but I read your closing remarks and thought why bother. This MORON is wearing his tin hat AND hasn't taken his medication.

        And by the way, you wasted valuable time posting when you could have been investing Bill O'Reilly's birth certificate!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 10:39 pm ET)
        4  
        So this is where the blind hang out!!!
        And, unfortunately, your guiding light has burned out. You're obviously not as bright as you think you are. My guess is your innate intelligence died from lack of use.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 05, 2009 10:45 pm ET)
        6  
        And how soon you forget the way you felt after 9/11
        I felt that George W Bush was even more incompetent than he was on 9/10.

        I felt our President was a coward when he sat reading a juvenile book about a pet goat for seven minutes while the country was under attack.

        I felt our President was a coward when he took Air Force One to hide in Nebraska instead of reassuring the country.

        I felt our President was an incompetent moron when Bill Clinton made it to New York from Australia faster than George W Bush got there from Sarasota, where he read the juvenile book.

        That's the way I felt on 9/11.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Joey Tranchina (June 07, 2009 5:33 am ET)
        1  
        I have heard each of these absurd right-wing talking points before. You don't have a clue how wrong you are. But, I'll bet you fifty cents you can't back up a single one of those accusations with a fact.

        You probably loved George Bush. He didn't have his facts straight either. But his administration is largely responsible for this mess.

        Naturally, you don't want to stick around for a debate, like your heros Rush, Sean & Bill, you can't cut it when it comes to facing the truth.

        Have a nice time hanging out in you hide-hole with Fox News... don't worry you won't learn anything that disturbs your delusions there.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by runnerin1 (June 05, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
      6  
      Please take a listen to Hannity's interview with Limbaugh part II. During the interview, Limbaugh actually states about Obama, "he's an easy target", then Limbaugh pauses and says "oh politically". Soon afterward, Hannity says, "oh yeah, I agree with you on that other thing too".
      I have been furious ever since. These comments need to be examined. Limbaugh was clearly sending a message to his nuts out there, just like O'reilly has. And, of course, if proven, he should be prosecuted.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (June 06, 2009 11:56 am ET)
        2  
        Just the idea that these two would interview each other is astounding. It's one big infomercial for the blind-leading-the-blind network of dopes.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (June 06, 2009 4:53 am ET)
      4  
      i always wonder how the producers that edit these clips actually allow people like hannity to spout lies like this. what a nerve.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by teccoord (June 06, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
      3  
      To Mr. Hannity and the rest of the Neo-Cons, as you take snip-its from the so called Swooning Liberal Obama News Media, to twist the truth about the strength of our President, or try to spread lies to the Jewish community about the Presidents support of Israel, you are in fact supporting the enemies of the United States and attempting to destroy the security of the United States. Your abuse of the airwaves is absolutely treasonous and I think you should be prosecuted.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Joey Tranchina (June 06, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
      1  
      Intentional misquotation, by blatantly deceptive selective-editing of President Obama;s Cairo speech, is journalistic malpractice. This outrage demonstrates that Sean Hannity is a practicing propagandist. Both as a journalist and as a human being, Mr. Hannity lacks integrity.

      If there remains a functioning professional organization of television journalists, it must publicly distinguish Hannity's practices from journalism, because, by this cynical misrepresentation of the president's words to support opposition ideology, Sean Hannity violated journalistic ethics and disgraced the profession. I believe, his behavior deserves immediate, deliberate and public censure.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (June 06, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
      3  
      Then Hannity will have a tizzy about this MMFA article and claim HE was taken out of context. What a tool's tool.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Frank Katz (June 07, 2009 12:54 am ET)
      1  
      Hannity and his ilk at Fox Noise (not my phrase, I believe Keith Olbermann coined the phrase) have their respective heads so far up their boheinies that they could all place sunglasses on their navels and go out on sunny beaches. How Fox manages to stay on the airways totally eludes me but that's fodder for another comment. Thanx for allowing a little ole geezer to vent.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mauman (June 07, 2009 10:04 am ET)
      3  
      I bet there's a mortal sin lurking somewhere in all of this: bearing false witness, anger, hatred, there's got to be something.

      If there is, and if Hannity knows it, he must confess it to a priest. If he doesn't, he goes to Hell. Is Obama really worth that, Sean?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mauman (June 07, 2009 10:09 am ET)
         
      I bet there's a mortal sin lurking somewhere in all of this: bearing false witness, anger, hatred, there's got to be something.

      If there is, and if Hannity knows it, he must confess it to a priest. If he doesn't, he goes to Hell. Is Obama really worth that, Sean?
      Report Abuse