About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Conservatives link Obama's purported "class warfare," positioning "America against the Jewish state" to Holocaust Museum shooting

June 11, 2009 12:21 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Several media conservatives have criticized President Obama for creating an "environment" and "climate" that helped foster the recent shooting at the Holocaust Museum.

26 Comments

In their reactions to the June 10 shooting at the Holocaust Museum, several conservatives in the media have criticized President Obama for creating an "environment" and "climate" that helped foster the shooting. For instance, financial analyst and radio host Jim Lacamp said on Fox News that "we have an administration that's really done a lot of class warfare, a lot of class-baiting. And so, it sets the stage for social unrest"; syndicated radio host Tammy Bruce repeatedly claimed that the Obama administration's "increasing anti-Israel rhetoric and the pandering to the Jew-hating world Arab world ... encourages all the beasts among us"; and Newsmax.com posted a column claiming that "[i]t is no coincidence that we are witnessing this level of hatred toward Jews as President Barack Obama positions America against the Jewish state."

During the June 10 edition of Fox News' Your World, Lacamp said that the Obama administration has engaged in "class warfare" and in "a lot of class-baiting," which he said he's "very concerned about moving forward":

CAVUTO: Well, and also we should say, the last terror attack -- but not this was not a terror attack, I got to stress that, and nor do authorities think it was -- but it occurred in Washington and it occurred in New York, and do you think, then, Jim, had this been in any other city -- take nothing away from a Wichita or a Macon, Georgia -- that it would've gotten the attention or gripped Wall Street the way this did?

LACAMP: New York and Washington, D.C., those are the two hubs, and anywhere else it would not have had the same impact. It does highlight something that I'm very concerned about economically, and that's social unrest. You have a lot of people losing their jobs; you have a lot of people losing their homes -- they're angry. And as interest rates go up, foreclosures accelerate, and we're going to have a lot of resets over the next two years. The same time, municipalities are cutting back on their police forces, and we have an administration that's really done a lot of class warfare, a lot of class-baiting. And so, it sets the stage for social unrest, and that's one of the things that I'm very concerned about moving forward.

CAVUTO: Although we're not making political views on this --

LACAMP: Right.

CAVUTO: I know where you're coming from.

Later during the program, Bob Newman -- a Colorado radio host whom Cavuto presented as a "terror expert" -- raised questions about whether Obama's recent visit to a concentration camp or his statement about Israeli settlements were factors in the shooting:

CAVUTO: But, Bob, normally when you're in tough economic times, it does bring out the sort of -- the home-grown loonies. And I wonder whether that's what we have to worry about, or we should be not forgetting. What do you think?

NEWMAN: That is oftentimes one of what is called the lead-up catalyst -- what led to this particular act that was mentioned just a few moments ago? What was the president of the United States doing last week? He was visiting a Holocaust site in Germany with Chancellor [Angela] Merkel. And a day or two before that, he was mentioning some things about the Jews in regards to the settlements in the West Bank. Were those factors here? Well, we don't know. That's what the investigation is for. Remember, simply because something might seem obvious upfront -- this has to be it -- not necessarily.

CAVUTO: Very true.

NEWMAN: And that's where the FBI will come in. They'll get to the bottom of it.

As Media Matters for America noted, Newman has a history of anti-Obama and anti-Muslim statements.

During her June 10 program, Bruce repeatedly claimed that Obama -- whom she refers to as "Urkel" -- "encourages" terrorist attacks and helped create the "environment" for attacks such as the Holocaust Museum shooting. While speculating about the identity of the shooter, who she said could be named "Muhammad," Bruce said:

BRUCE: We have this development, as I've noted.

One of the more important positions of the president is to send a message to people everywhere about what's going on, and the message of this president is: Israel does not deserve support. We are the bad guys. We have been wrong. We must pander to Islamists. We are grabbing our ankles. And what does that manifest as?

It is no coincidence that in the first -- that it takes the first six months of this man's dawn of a new era, Americans are taken hostage by foreign tyrants and Muslims, who happen to be American, are planning to try and have murdered people in this country. This is the environment that has been created by the American left.

Bruce later claimed: "On a day when his spiritual mentor and father figure, and a man who considers him his son, complained about 'them Jews.' A few days after B. Hussein Obama speaks to Islamists in Egypt, pandering and apologizing and grabbing his ankles."

Bruce also said: "Bottom line: The increasing anti-Israel rhetoric and the pandering to the Jew-hating world Arab world by the Urkel administration encourages all the beasts among us. ... When beasts among us get a sense that there is no leadership or you have a pantywaist in the White House, and there are no repercussions to what you do, and that this nation is bad, those kinds of people tell themselves they have permission to be crazy, to do want they want to do. Welcome to Urkel world." She further stated: "[W]hen you go exclusively to the Jew-haters and pander, you encourage beasts like this. Suddenly, beasts like this guy believe that they've been in the right."

Echoing her radio comments, Bruce wrote on Twitter: "Whomever the shooter is, there is no doubt the increasing anti-Israel rhetoric by the Urkel admim [sic] inflames and encourages beasts among us."

Hours after the shooting, Newsmax.com published a column by Rabbi Dr. Morton H. Pomerantz, a chaplain for the State of New York, headlined, "Obama Breeds Climate of Hate Against Jews." Pomerantz wrote: "Our new president did not tell a virulent anti-Semite to travel to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington to kill Jews, but he is most certainly creating a climate of hate against us. It is no coincidence that we are witnessing this level of hatred toward Jews as President Barack Obama positions America against the Jewish state." From Pomerantz's column:

Our new president did not tell a virulent anti-Semite to travel to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington to kill Jews, but he is most certainly creating a climate of hate against us.

It is no coincidence that we are witnessing this level of hatred toward Jews as President Barack Obama positions America against the Jewish state.

[...]

While Obama acknowledged that "six million Jews were killed -- more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today" -- his discussion about the Holocaust was followed by this statement: "On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people -- Muslims and Christians -- have suffered in pursuit of a homeland."

"On the other hand ... "?

Obama's clever construct comparing the mass genocide of six million Jews to the Palestinian struggle will not be lost on the estimated 100 million Muslims who tuned into to hear him.

Perhaps it was not lost on James W. von Brunn, the 88-year-old white supremacist identified as the alleged attacker Wednesday at the Holocaust Museum. He apparently felt that he could easily take retribution against the Jews for the atrocities Obama implies they are guilty of.

From the June 10 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:

CAVUTO: Jim, I'm always interested in how, you know, Wall Street follows this, too --

LACAMP: Right.

CAVUTO: -- because there were a lot of things to worry about with the economy.

LACAMP: Sure.

CAVUTO: But I've got to tell you, to a man and woman I talked to in the business world, they all tell me, "Neil, what's going on in Washington, the shooting?" Even though we have a pay czar controversy over, you know, how much money we're doling out, this -- I always feel this is sort of the unaddressed scab for Wall Street, that they're not quite over this, and maybe after 9-11, they never will be. What do you make of it?

LACAMP: I think you're absolutely right. I think we've lost a generation of buy-and-hold investors. Now, keep in mind, the market, if you go back 13 years, isn't any higher than it was 13 years ago.

CAVUTO: That's true.

LACAMP: People lost a lot of money in 2000 to 2002 --

CAVUTO: And they don't need much to get off the buying pot, do they?

LACAMP: They sure don't. And they lost a lot of money in those three years, then they lost a lot of money in 2008. They're still hearing all this economic news. The housing market has not gotten any better, so I think there's a lot of skepticism about the health of the economy and the stock market as a result. And so, people are still very leery of the stock market, and you can throw Washington and Wall Street into that mix because they're still leery about people on Washington and Wall Street.

CAVUTO: Well, and also we should say, the last terror attack -- but not this was not a terror attack, I got to stress that, and nor do authorities think it was -- but it occurred in Washington and it occurred in New York, and do you think, then, Jim, had this been in any other city -- take nothing away from a Wichita or a Macon, Georgia -- that it would've gotten the attention or gripped Wall Street the way this did?

LACAMP: New York and Washington, D.C., those are the two hubs, and anywhere else it would not have had the same impact. It does highlight something that I'm very concerned about economically, and that's social unrest. You have a lot of people losing their jobs; you have a lot of people losing their homes -- they're angry. And as interest rates go up, foreclosures accelerate, and we're going to have a lot of resets over the next two years. The same time, municipalities are cutting back on their police forces, and we have an administration that's really done a lot of class warfare, a lot of class-baiting. And so, it sets the stage for social unrest, and that's one of the things that I'm very concerned about moving forward.

CAVUTO: Although we're not making political views on this --

LACAMP: Right.

CAVUTO: I know where you're coming from.

From the June 10 broadcast of Talk Radio Network's The Tammy Bruce Show:

BRUCE: All right, Tom, we'll move on from this. The basic news is that the suspect is in custody. We don't know if he is shot. We still don't know how this transpired; some of the early news I heard was that the shooter went in shooting.

We, of course, do not have a name, or if the word Muhammad is in the name. What we do know already is that for the first time since September 11th, we have incidences of American Muslims -- Barack Hussein Obama is in office for six months -- for the first time since September 11th, 2001, we have had incidences of American Muslims planning attacks on Jews and infidels, or, in the instance of our recruiter, Private William Long -- may God bless his soul, may he rest in peace -- being shot dead by an American Muslim who had plotted and planned a variety of attacks, including against Jews. We have this development, as I've noted.

One of the more important positions of the president is to send a message to people everywhere about what's going on, and the message of this president is: Israel does not deserve support. We are the bad guys. We have been wrong. We must pander to Islamists. We are grabbing our ankles. And what does that manifest as?

It is no coincidence that in the first -- that it takes the first six months of this man's dawn of a new era, Americans are taken hostage by foreign tyrants and Muslims, who happen to be American, are planning to try and have murdered people in this country. This is the environment that has been created by the American left.

[...]

BRUCE: Whether it is an Islamist or not, somebody chose to take a rifle into the Holocaust Museum six months into the B. Hussein Obama administration. On a day when his spiritual mentor and father figure, and a man who considers him his son, complained about "them Jews." A few days after B. Hussein Obama speaks to Islamists in Egypt, pandering and apologizing and grabbing his ankles.

[...]

BRUCE: Bottom line: The increasing anti-Israel rhetoric and the pandering to the Jew-hating world Arab world by the Urkel administration encourages all the beasts among us. When there is also a seemingly -- a seeming lack of leadership and chaos -- there is a quiet chaos going on in this country right now, enough quiet chaos to where 1.2 million conservatives organize themselves on tax day.

So, you have the anti-abortion guy murdering Tiller. You've got the Islamists murdering a troop. You've got more American Islamists trying to plan, and planning, trying to implement the murder of Jews and infidels -- this is the Bronx group -- of course those two Islamist plans are ignored by the media. Big headline, now, out quickly: "white supremacist" -- as opposed to, of course, the fact that that means Jew hater. You got to make this be about race, even though it's about hating the Jews.

[...]

BRUCE: Bob in Miami says Obama's politics with the Islamic terrorists fomented this attack today at the Holocaust museum. Look, there is a reason why the Arab Islamists during World War II aligned with Hitler, because they had one thing in common: They wanted the Jews gone.

And this is just -- every dynamic, whether it is the murder of an abortion doctor, the murder of a troop, the murder of Jews, the shooting of tourists, here's what we can tell you: When beasts among us get a sense that there is no leadership or you have a pantywaist in the White House, and there are no repercussions to what you do, and that this nation is bad, those kinds of people tell themselves they have permission to be crazy, to do want they want to do. Welcome to Urkel world. This is what it is.

[...]

BRUCE: The people who are shooting people include those who are encouraged by the positions of B. Hussein Obama, including, of course, the troops -- look, when you say you're not going to release detainee photos because it's going to make people hate the troops, you're saying our troops have done horrible things. And then, oh my gosh, an Islamist -- an American Islamist murders a troop. What a shocker.

When you tell the world America's the bad guy, we will -- we're never going to defend ourselves again and we're just going to go negotiate with you, you get hostages taken. You get women hostages taken. And when you send a message to the world that Israel is a problem, Israel is committing genocide, that the so-called Palestinians have been put upon and deserve their own land, even though they had it and they used it as a terrorist man pad; when you go exclusively to the Jew-haters and pander, you encourage beasts like this. Suddenly, beasts like this guy believe that they've been in the right.

Why do you think an airplane falls from the sky? Because the enemy and beasts have been aided and comforted by a new world order that says you've been right, we deserve to be punished. Do it.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by southerngal (June 11, 2009 12:37 pm ET)
      5  
      This logic from these idiots like Tammy Bruce doesn't even make sense. If, as they say, Obama is fueling all this hatred towards Jews, then logically these anti-Semitic nutcases out there would be celebrating Obama and rejoicing in his so called "rhetoric". Why would they feel the need to act on their hatred so violently if they have a friend and fellow Jew-hater in the White House? It's utterly ridiculous, and so irresponsible, it's amazing.

      If these rightwing fear-mongers can't see that they are the ones fueling hatred they are not only shameful liars, but despicable human beings.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (June 11, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
        3  
        Yeah, I'm kind of doubting that a white supremacist would take his marching orders from the first black president.
        Report Abuse
          • Author by highliter (June 11, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
               
            Im not saying it’s a left wing view but how is white supremacy a right wing view??
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 12, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
           
        It's even worse than that, rightON. These radio and TV personalities have been allowed to hijack the mainstream of the Republican party. Now there is actual (once respected) major political party that espouses this kind of nonsense.

        It is killing the Republican party, but it is also hurting the country at this point. It is no longer cute to play dumb like this and encourage ignorance and self-denial in the masses who want to hear this kind of pat-on-the-back nuttery.

        Tammy Bruce and Rush Limbaugh are killing a party that once had actual statesmen in it. It always had a few looneys that were even cute in their madness (see Bob Barr), but they now are populated by nutjobs and it is about the only ones left in the party at this point.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Old_Benjamin (June 11, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
      2  
      Yeah, the guy responsible for this...

      Von Brunn is the author of the 1999 book, “Kill the Best Gentiles,” a racist and anti-Semitic tome that argues that whites are seeing “today on the world stage a tragedy of enormous proportions: the calculated destruction of the White Race and the incomparable culture it represents. Europe, former fortress of the West, is now over-run by hordes of non-Whites and mongrels.” A raging anti-Semite, von Brunn blames “The Jews” for the destruction of the West. The book is dedicated to prominent neo-Nazis and racists including Revilo Oliver and Wilmot Robertson.

      Is taking cues from the president?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (June 11, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
           
        I guess it is the same logic used to blame O'Reilly et al for the murder of Dr. Tiller. Misguided!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 12, 2009 6:36 pm ET)
             
          Yeah, and forcing Obama to claim that he was running a "death mill" and that anyone who didn't stop him has "blood on his hands". Etc., etc., etc. I am tired of all these lefties forcing O'Reilly and Limbaugh to sound like lunatics. Now they are even forcing Limbaugh to twist himself into some kind of logic pretzel to claim that Nazis and Von Brunn are liberal Democrats. Dastardly Democrats.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (June 11, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
      3  
      I've heard no anti-Israeli or anti-Jewish rhetoric from Obama.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 11, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
        5 1
        Of course you haven't, Shaggles. You need to put on some headphones, and connect them to a coaxial cable inserted in to the most primitive, reptilian part of Tammy Bruce's brain (otherwise known as "her brain")

        I hope nobody here expresses hatred for Bruce. She doesn't deserve it, any more than a dog that dumps on your lawn, or snaps at you when frightened.She only deserves pity, as does her audience.

        The difference between her and the Von Brunn types (in their thinking, at least, not necessarily the actions) is only in the details. While she may go to the same unthinking emotional breakdown over the victimization of Jews, and Von Brunn may see the Jews as the villains, they really aren't that far apart.

        Their fear and paranoia are so closely related,to each other as well as to that of fundamentalist Muslim terrorists, that the who and what of their hate is almost insignificant.

        "Crazy" doesn't need to be consistent.We need to start getting all of these nuts out in the light, the ones who merely influence the killers as well as the killers themselves, regardless of which list of enemies each individual has in their bunker..
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jon wisby (June 11, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
         
      This must be very confusing to their listeners.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Blue Fielder (June 11, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
      2 1
      How much more proof do we need that conservatism is a disease?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (June 11, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
        2  
        That's slanderous. Conservatism isn't a disease, it's a character flaw.
        Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (June 11, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
            2  
            Not to be anti-semantic, but that would be a condition.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (June 11, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
        3  
        To be fair this is nothing to do with conservatism. It just about blaming the other side or trying to deflect blame for a violent act by an obvious right wing nut.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by GRW2000 (June 11, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
         
      She's just a no name, ignorant, rightwinger in the lowest and the most shameless form one could possibly imagine.
      She probably want to get Roger Ailes' attention.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 11, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
      1 1
      That's funny. I link it to whacky right-wing conspircy thoeries like this one!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pags2 (June 11, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
      1  
      Given the choice of saying something reasonable or the preposterous, the Republicans opt for the latter and usually in front of a TV camera.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 11, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
        2 1
        Ok, I'm trying not to do any more copy/pasting from the wingnut emails I get, but I'm amazed that they seem to be ramping up the rhetoric in the wake of all of the recent acts of Conservo-terrorism.

        This is the heading of an ad from American Vision that I received about 10 minutes ago.

        Friends, it's no longer 1984. It's 2009, and this is YOUR America. Are you going to lie down and die... or are you going to FIGHT?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (June 11, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
          1  
          I think they're trying to start a fire, hoping it will spread to the other nutjobs out there.

          And it's comforting to know that because of all of their fears, guns sales are increasing.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (June 11, 2009 7:19 pm ET)
          1  
          Friends, it's no longer 1984. It's 2009, and this is YOUR America. Are you going to lie down and die... or are you going to FIGHT?

          But when someone out there takes it seriously and starts (more) shooting, it's all the liberals' fault. Riiiight...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by congero6189599 (June 11, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
      2 1
      Michael Rowe had a very well written article on the Huffington post about yesterdays shooting and the hate dialogue on our airwaves that feed it. Here is an excerpt from it :"...If O'Reilly had been a serious journalist or broadcaster instead of a sclerotic, chronically-aggravated right-wing rage pimp, he might have had the professional self-awareness or ethical sense to realize that he was putting George Tiller's life in danger over the more than 28 broadcasts in which he used Tiller's name. But O'Reilly, like, for Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, and indeed Coulter herself (to name only the gratin of that particular food chain) is neither of those things.

      As a group, they are the pop culture equivalent of necrotic carrion beetles, crawling with insectile determination from one infected open wound in the American psyche to another. The wounds include fear of race, fear of foreigners, fear of sexuality, fear of difference, hysterical religious fundamentalism, violent nationalism, and paranoia. They lay their eggs in the infected abrasion, then scuttle away. When the eggs hatch, disgorging rage and discontent, they start counting money..." Here is the link to the full article : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-rowe/the-holocaust-museum-shoo_b_214133.html

      Report Abuse
      • Author by southerngal (June 11, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
        2 1
        I agree with much of what Rowe says here, I read it too. The sad reality is that incidences such as this shooting only strengthen their resolve and amp up their rhetoric even more.

        Rather than act like decent human beings and take some responsibility for any part they may have contributed to the poisonous hatred they cultivate every day, they calculate and manipulate the circumstances to give them an "out". They invent some bizarro scenario to fan the flames even more - just so they can position and insulate themselves to deflect any blame that comes their way.

        It's all about their own a$$, and keeping it off the grill.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (June 11, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
          1  
          And, of course, Weiner is whining that by quoting him in context, MMFA is putting his life in danger. So, while the diatribes he spews are a danger to his life, his free speech is no danger to the lives of those he targets for that 10 million strong, or whatever-it-is, audience of his.

          Logic? We don't need no stinkin logic!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 12, 2009 6:41 pm ET)
             
          Right. Because as long as they are not legally culpable then they shall accept no blame. As if the only rule in life is as long as you are not prosecuted then you shall feel no guilt. It's part of the same mindset that leads someone to believe they have the best "news" show because they get high ratings. If I get good ratings then I must be a good reporter. If I do not get prosecuted then I must have done nothing wrong. A true man spends a little time on self-reflection each day and considers whether or not he is doing the things in life that make a good person. Sadly, these things are beyond the reach of an O'Reilly or a Limbaugh. They lack even the self awareness to consider that their OPINIONS may ever be wrong.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (June 11, 2009 10:42 pm ET)
      1  
      James Von Brunn was an anti-semite before anybody even knew who Barack Obama was. He had an anti-semitic website and wrote anti-semitic books for years before Obama came into the national spotlight. He probably had these views before Barack Obama was even born. These claims are ridiculous and desperate. White supremacy and anti-semitism are now extreme leftist views. Gimme a break. There had been those on the right accusing some on the left of being anti-semitic or anti-Israel for years, but that has nothing to do with this shooting. They are shifting the blame deliberately, and they are projecting. Projection is big with them. It's a big method they try to use for justification of their irresponsible ideology.

      THANK YOU.
      njguy93@yahoo.com
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.