About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Conservatives attack Shep Smith for his Holocaust museum shooting remarks, call for firing

June 11, 2009 3:54 pm ET

SUMMARY: In response to Shepard Smith's remarks that the Holocaust museum shooting validated a recent DHS report on right-wing extremism, several conservative media figures have attacked Smith or called for his firing from Fox News.

30 Comments

On June 10, Fox News anchor Shepard Smith said the Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting validated a recent Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report alerting law enforcement to an increased threat from "rightwing extremists," including "white supremacists." Smith said: "[T]his is a former military guy and he's gone extremist. They were warning us for a reason -- not about something political or social or anything else. ... It was a warning to us all. And it appears now that they were right." Smith also said that he's receiving "more and more frightening" emails from viewers since President Obama's election, including conspiracy theories about Obama's birth certificate. In response to Smith's remarks about the Holocaust museum shooting, several conservative media figures have attacked Smith or called for his firing from Fox News.

During his June 11 radio program, Rush Limbaugh said of Smith's remarks: "For liberals to now claim that the atmosphere is somehow more violently anti-Obama is simply preposterous." Limbaugh also said Smith was "whining and moaning and complaining about emails." After stating that he, too, got "vile, sick emails," Limbaugh said, "Shep, you got nothing on anybody out there."

In a June 10 post headlined "Please Shepard Smith Out the Door!" on the blog Atlas Shrugs, conservative blogger Pamela Geller wrote of Smith -- who has also debunked the claim that in the DHS report, the Obama administration was targeting conservatives and others simply because they disagree with administration policies and proposals:

How amusing that Shepard feels the need to take this opportunity to scold us for doing the job the media and schmucks like him won't do. He also took the opportunity to vouch for the DHS report on right wing extremism. You know, the one that targeted vets, tea party attendees, Jewish extremists -- as the real threats to the country. The 89 year old Nazi Von Brunn served in World War II -- are those the new terror threats? WW2 vets? Scary stupidity.

FOX could do so much better than this pompous elitist. If Beck proved anything, it's that if you are halfway talented, your numbers will go through the roof. Beating the competition when you're on FOX is no biggie. The competition of CNN, MSNBC et al drives people to FOX. Leading the leftwing media asshats is not the bar to beat. FOX numbers are the bar. I am sure, for example, if FOX dropped Beck into Greta's spot, he would increase their numbers at 10pm by 30%.

But Shep sucks. And Shep has always sucked, and it's time to get rid of the deadwood. I don't know where he gets off talking down to us, but it's not his job to defend Obama and to try to tie African American racism into this Jew hating incident. Funny thing, though, he didn't discuss Jew hatred at all. Nope. An 89 year old Nazi goes into the Holocaust museum and shoots up the place, and Shep is whining about the lack of O-love. And that racism is driving that lack o'love. Earth to Shep: Americans are angry because Obama is destroying the country. And what does that have to do with an 89 year old nazi shooting up the Museum devoted to mass extermination of the Jews?

Why does Shep have his panties all in a twist? Nazis aren't new. Or special. Look at all of Europe during World War II. Systemically they killed their Jews, every country (save the Danes), with gusto.

Shep, don't preach to us about anger. This from a guy who hit a reporter with his car as she saved a parking space. He was arrested for it too. (Above photo is Smith's mugshot) Yup. And who can forget his leftist asshattery last month, when Fox anchor Shepard Smith, on a post-broadcast Webcast, lost it when discussing his opposition to waterboarding, etc -- bellowing: "We are America!" (slamming the table) "I don't give a rat's ass if it helps. We are AMERICA! We do not f---ing torture!!"

He has got to go.

Geller, who has frequently promoted conspiracy theories about Obama's birth certificate, also wrote:

I am watching Shepard's show dumbfounded. He is pointing his smug, short stubby finger at us for mistreating Obama (no mention of how Obama has treated the Constitution, Capitalism, and our allies). He is yelling at us for calling Obama a Muslim (he was born a Muslim, don't shoot the messenger, man), and for questioning the origins of his birth (vault copy, anyone?). But what does this have to do with the Nazi Von Brunn? I do not know. The Nazi Von Brunn website, wildly gross, is not a diatribe against Obama. It's a Jew hating white supremacist cesspool. This is a man who is a Hitlerite -- who wants to exterminate the Jewish people -- and yeah, he hates black people, too.

In a June 10 WorldNetDaily article about Smith's remarks, executive news editor Joe Kovacs suggested hypocrisy by Smith, writing:

Smith made numerous references to a Department of Homeland Security report warning of potential violence from "right-wing extremists," and said he's been personally disturbed by an increase in e-mail to him from people "who are way out there on a limb ... out there in a scary place."

He read what he called a representative message that asked, "How dare you tell us to get over the birth certificate ... ?"

Ironically, Smith himself allegedly engaged in activity some might deem questionable.

As WND previously reported, during the presidential election fiasco in November 2000, Smith was arrested at the Florida Capitol for allegedly driving his Mazda Millenia into another reporter who was standing in a parking space she attempted to save for a friend. The victim, freelance journalist Maureen Walsh of Tallahassee, was hospitalized and released later the same day with bruises on her knees and legs.

Kovacs then went on to summarize WorldNetDaily's articles on Obama's birth certificate. On his blog, ConWebBlog, Media Matters for America senior editor Terry Krepel noted of Kovacs' reporting:

At no point, however, does Kovacs mention the reason that Smith brought up the subject: The accused shooter, James von Brunn, is a white supremacist who also believes in the WND-promoted conspiracy that Obama is hiding evidence that he's not a "natural-born citizen" and, thus, ineligible to be president. As we've noted, von Brunn's name is on an Internet posting of a list of Obama-related documents that have supposedly not been released to the public; the day before the Holocaust Museum shooting, WND published an article that appears to have been inspired by von Brunn's list.

In a June 10 post on HotAir.com, which was founded by Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin, blogger Allahpundit wrote that Smith made a "hamfisted attempt to draw a straight line between dopey 'Hussein' invective and the sort of decades-long dementia displayed by the Jew-loathing nut who pulled a shotgun in the Holocaust Museum today. (And who, by the way, hated neoconservatives generally and the GOP's last two nominees for president in particular.) I don't know how else to read this clip except as Shep warning America that his own viewership is teeming with would-be presidential assassins. If he truly believes that, why doesn't he quit? How can his conscience stand it?" From the post:

Take a group of people who are politically conscious, add Internet access and anonymity, and elect the other party's guy president and voila: You've got a perfect petri dish in which to grow your very own nutroots culture. And no, before people start whining, of course I'm not saying that everyone who fits those criteria is nutroots. Just that we're seeing a strain of paranoia in some righty blog comments since The One took office that was formerly relegated to lefty assertions about how the Bushitler would cancel the elections and declare himself king or whatever. If that were Shep's point, it'd be fair enough; as it is, this is his hamfisted attempt to draw a straight line between dopey "Hussein" invective and the sort of decades-long dementia displayed by the Jew-loathing nut who pulled a shotgun in the Holocaust Museum today. (And who, by the way, hated neoconservatives generally and the GOP's last two nominees for president in particular.) I don't know how else to read this clip except as Shep warning America that his own viewership is teeming with would-be presidential assassins. If he truly believes that, why doesn't he quit? How can his conscience stand it?

The bonus nuance here is that this vid was cut by TPM, which is suddenly shocked, shocked to find incendiary rhetoric online notwithstanding the notoriety their fellow travelers have for trafficking in it. Doubtless the point is to prove how unhinged Fox viewers are, but surf around on CNN or MSNBC or any other news website and compare the comments there. Jake Tapper's mentioned more than once on Twitter how even his scrupulously balanced posts at ABC attract nutjobs by the dozen from both sides. Trolls are an Internet fact of life, alas. It's time to stop being surprised.

On her Twitter account, Fox News political contributor and radio host Tammy Bruce re-tweeted a June 10 tweet that said of Smith: "Can't see TV from here. Did Shepherd Smith get mascara in his eyes again?" Bruce added of the remarks: "LOL!!" From the original tweet by user "darthdilbert":

Bruce's re-tweeting of the remarks:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (June 11, 2009 4:00 pm ET)
      7  
      Interesting. So now hate email is no big deal. Just a couple of months ago weren't the collective right all up in arms about one of their own getting hate emails?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by micost51 (June 11, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
         
      These right-wing postings are full of the self-righteous venom of which Smith was speaking. They prove his point.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pags2 (June 11, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
      9  
      I would not be surprised if Smith is pulled from Fox but at least he can walk away with some credibility and respectability.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kfraz43 (June 11, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
           
        I'd like to see Shep on MSNBC early morning, or at 5:00p EST, or at 10:00p EST after Keith...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (June 11, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
        5 2
        I think his credibility suffers from that "military guy," remark. Von Brunn was in during WWII, facrissakes. The statute of limitations has run out. In addition he was giving credence to the canard that the DHS report was attacking veterans and the military. Anyone who read the report with half a brain engaged could see that that wasn't true.
        Right wing hysteria and terrorism, however, does seem to be effective. The "liberal" media has, with few exceptions, been thouroughly cowed, and targeted assassinations of medical personnel have effectively taken away women's control of their own bodies, no matter what the law says.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by southerngal (June 11, 2009 5:18 pm ET)
        8 1
        He won't be pulled, that would be too obvious. He may get a little scolding but this isn't the first time he has bucked the boss' party line playbook. He seems to have a mind of his own, and a conscience. He is to be admired.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (June 11, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
          7  
          He does seem to have a mind of his own. I wonder how he fooled the guys who hired him into thinking that he was a partisan shill?

          Either way, good for you, Shep!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by christopher howard (June 12, 2009 12:09 am ET)
            5  
            I doubt Fox will pull him. He is part of the minimalist window dressing Fox uses to keep spinning their "fair and balanced" schtick.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by phredicles (June 12, 2009 12:42 am ET)
              1  
              I thought that was Colmes.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by amento1 (June 12, 2009 9:25 am ET)
                1  
                Shepard Smith is far more visible than Mr. Colmes these days, and thus far more useful to FNC. Christopher Howard's comment is dead-on.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by keywhiz (June 12, 2009 11:07 am ET)
        3  
        I don't know if Smith is a conservative or a liberal, but it's been clear for a long time that he's the only one at FOX who takes the "fair and balanced" thing seriously.

        No wonder all the conservatives who try to hide their bias behind the "fair and balanced" moniker are calling for his head. His fairness exposes them for who they really are.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nanooknw (June 11, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
         
      If Shep leaves Fox the last visage of sanity will have left.
      They will be the network of nut burgers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mrhebert74 (June 11, 2009 5:49 pm ET)
      10  
      Step 1: April 9 memo warns law enforcement agencies of potential violence by extremists whose radicalism may be "hate-oriented." It also warns of antigovernment extremists and those who are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

      Step 2: Conservatives condemn the report, saying it paints all conservatives as extremists, even though the report is clearly only about extremists who might commit violent acts of terrorism.

      Step 3: A guy who's obsessed with opposition to abortion murders a doctor who provided abortions.

      Step 4: A guy who's oriented to hatred of Jews and blacks attacks a Holocaust museum, murdering a black man working as a security guard at the museum.

      Step 5: A news anchor points out that the report, which warned of violence by extremists who oppose abortion or who hate Jews or blacks, was a warning about violence by extremists who oppose abortion or who hate Jews or blacks.

      Step 6: Conservatives holler for the news anchor's firing.

      That seem about right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Pinhead (June 11, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
        2  
        Step 2: Conservatives condemn the report, saying it paints all conservatives as extremists, even though the report is clearly only about extremists who might commit violent acts of terrorism.


        I know they are looking for anything to fight Obama on, but why this one? I know you can't rationalize what some of these cons do, but this tactic is dumb even for them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (June 11, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
        7  
        You forgot the part where the conservatives claim that the white-supremacist anti-semite killer of an African-American security guard is actually a leftist. Other than that, though...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (June 12, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
        3  
        And don't forget--only the libruls are trying to silence people who don't agree with their ideas. Just ask Rush, Hannity, Billo...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (June 11, 2009 8:01 pm ET)
      6  
      I said it once and I will say it again.

      Shepherd Smith is the most reasonable man; among the most unreasonable men.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (June 11, 2009 8:34 pm ET)
        3  
        I believe he's had other outbursts of sanity before this one. Didn't he also express outrage at the administration's initial handling of Katrina?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by overmars jr. (June 11, 2009 9:01 pm ET)
          1  
          The absolute best was when he used an entire evening to openly mock Glenn Beck on "Glenn Beck Day" at FNC.

          I was so delighted I may have peed a little.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (June 12, 2009 10:28 am ET)
          2  
          He most certainly did. Same with Geraldo. Never will forget that live feed of Shep and Geraldo in N.O. right after the storm and Hannity looking and sounding like a complete stonehearted bastard.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Blackpete (June 11, 2009 8:29 pm ET)
      1  
      Regarding Sheppard Smith of faux newz, In the world of blind men, the one eyed man is a god.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 3rdParty (June 11, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
         
      Here's the funny thing...
      That hate mail in which Shep read wasn't even that bad. I'm sure he gets a crap load of emails that are far more psychotic that what he read.

      Either way; I guarantee Shep won't ever work for MSNBC but we may see him on CNN soon.

      That's one hell of a trade...Beck n' Van Susteren for Shep Smith.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (June 11, 2009 10:22 pm ET)
      6  
      This man was not a liberal and they know it. He held some beliefs that were jointly held by people on both sides of the political spectrum, such as the belief that 9/11 was an inside job. There are just as many traditional conservatives, right-wing militia types and libertarian-leaning individuals who believe that along with people on the left like liberals. They listen to Alex Jones or talk about the New World Order.

      There are also many conservatives who hated Bush 43 and John McCain as well. They felt Bush 43 betrayed conservative principles and feel that John McCain never really was a conservative at all. People like Limbaugh and other conservative talk radio hosts were railing against McCain throughout the 2008 Republican Primaries, and said he wasn't a true conservative and didn't deserve the nomination.

      There are many traditional conservatives, or paleo-cons, who speak out against Israel and Zionism as well, just as many liberals and Pro-Palestinian groups do.

      This man posted at FreeRepublic.com, believed that Barack Obama was not born in America, was against immigration, was for "purity" in American culture, and was part of some group that supported the Confederacy as well. That doesn't sound very liberal to me. This is a similar tactic that has been used by these people before. Basically just twist reality. Make something the opposite of what it is by selectively mentioning and distorting certain facts.

      THANK YOU.
      njguy93@yahoo.com
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mrhebert74 (June 11, 2009 10:39 pm ET)
        3  
        Why njguy, what a thoughtful analysis. No, thank you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by njguy93 (June 11, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
          4  
          No problem, Mr. Herbert. Just here to set the record straight, and I'm just doing my best with along with comrades (used intentionally) like you and the others on here. The trolls are good entertainment, but we need to set them straight every time they spew conservative bile onto this website.

          THANK YOU.
          njguy93@yahoo.com
          Report Abuse
      • Author by flylooper1943 (June 12, 2009 10:04 am ET)
           
        It seems to me the level of invective issuing from the far right conservative media, along with the ability for literally anyone to speak "publicly" on the internet, has allowed dangerous people to network with each other. Per se, it shouldn't be a problem, but perhaps what happens is that these people get so ramped up they will do things like shoot people they don't like.

        I think it's absolutely legitimate to believe that Shep Smith painted a bullseye on his back by speaking out.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Mister_C (June 12, 2009 1:57 am ET)
         
      Right about now to the Left Wing of Talk TV. Smith will become a HOT COMMODITY! He will get a HUGE deal with MSNBC, or CNN!

      The HELL with Faux news and these Right Wing Nuts!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lucius0729499 (June 12, 2009 4:39 am ET)
      1  
      Is it any surprise the "right" are turning on Shepard Smith? He broke the cardinal rule, thou doth not speak against the "right".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (June 12, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
      1  
      Memo to Pamela Geller: Perhaps before you blog the next time you will actually read the Report.

      Happily, Adobe includes an "Find" feature. Search for "Jew" or "Jewish" and you will find precisely two references.

      Neither, of course, mention "Jewish extremists." Her statement is another made up lie.

      Additionally, of course, the Holocaust Museum murderer (I do not wish to even mention his name) fits the Report "Lone Wolf" profile to a "T." But that's another story...

      utside your skills set, the actual Report reference to "Jews" may be found below:

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Rush Limbaugh
    ElRushbo@eibnet.com
    http://twitter.com/Limbaugh
  • The Rush Limbaugh Show
    1-800-282-2882
    rush@eibnet.com
    fax: 212-563-9166

    The Rush Limbaugh Show
    1270 Avenue of the Americas
    New York, NY 10020
  • Premiere Radio Networks
    Premiere
    Radio Networks


    Premiere Radio Networks, Inc.
    15260 Ventura Blvd. 5th Floor
    Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

    Main: (818)377-5300
    Fax: (818)377-5333
    Toll Free: (800)533-8686
  • WorldNetDaily
    PO Box 1087
    Grants Pass, OR 97528
    (541) 474-1776
    FAX: (541) 474-1770
  • Tammy Bruce
    E-mail: tammyblog@yahoo.com