About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Blitzer did not challenge Boehner's false claim that CBO scored "public option"

June 17, 2009 8:47 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Wolf Blitzer did not challenge Rep. John Boehner's false claim that the "Congressional Budget Office came out with a score on Senator Kennedy's bill, just part of ... his bill that says that the public option would cost over a trillion dollars." In fact, the CBO's preliminary analysis of the draft bill did not assess the impact of a "public option" for health insurance.

3 Comments

During the June 16 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer did not challenge House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-OH) false claim that the "Congressional Budget Office came out with a score on Senator [Edward M.] Kennedy's [D-MA] bill, just part of ... his bill that says that the public option would cost over a trillion dollars and would cause 23 million Americans to lose their private health-care coverage, and only 16 million of which would be covered under the government plan." In fact, the CBO's preliminary analysis of the Senate health committee's draft health-care reform bill does not assess the impact of a "public option" for health insurance, one of several provisions the committee is considering adding to the bill that CBO Director Douglas W. Elmendorf said "could ... have substantial effects on our analysis."

In a letter accompanying the CBO report, Elmendorf stated: "The draft legislation released by the HELP Committee ... indicates that certain features may be added at a later date. Because they are not reflected in the current draft, however, CBO and the JCT [Joint Committee on Taxation] staff did not take them into account." In particular, Elmendorf wrote: "The draft legislation ... indicates that the committee is considering whether to incorporate other features, including a 'public health insurance option' and requirements for 'shared responsibility' by employers. Depending on their details, such provisions could ... have substantial effects on our analysis."

From the June 16 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Let's talk about some of the domestic priorities under way right now. The president wants health-care reform, delivered a big speech on it yesterday. And in that speech, he said this. 

OBAMA [video clip]: So, when you hear the naysayers claim that I'm trying to bring about government-run health care, know this: They're not telling the truth.

BLITZER: Are you among those naysayers who are suggesting he wants to bring about government-run health care?

BOEHNER: Well, I think the president is ignoring the reality. The Congressional Budget Office came out with a score on Senator Kennedy's bill, just part of the -- of his bill that says that the public option would cost over a trillion dollars and would cause 23 million Americans to lose their private health-care coverage, and only 16 million of which would be covered under the government plan.

And so, it's not just me and others; it's very clear that the so-called public option would be subsidized by the government. It would draw people out of the private sector. It would cause companies to just give up their coverage and force people into a government-run plan. That's not what we --

BLITZER: I know you don't like a --

BOEHNER: That's not what we want. What we want is, we want to work with the president to make sure that all Americans have access to high-quality, affordable health insurance.

BLITZER: I know you don't want a government-run health insurance plan. You want a private-run plan. What about this proposal, this compromise, in between? Kent Conrad, the Democratic senator, suggesting co-ops, where you band together hundreds of thousands of people and you create a co-op that's not government-run, it's privately run, but it would potentially do the same thing.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by historygeek001 (June 17, 2009 11:23 am ET)
      1  
      Raise your hand if you're surprised that Boehner is lying. Again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (June 17, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
      1  
      I'm beginning to see what is killing and will ultimately kill the GOP: the free flow of information. Internet neutrality MUST be preserved or the GOP dinosaur will rise from the tar pits and seize control once again.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tkevan (June 18, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
           
        Nice try. Whether it's "Public Option" or not isn't the point. The Kennedy Bill, 'Affordable Health Choices Act' is the one before Congress, and it's the one that they reviewed. What it's called is unimportant if it passes, costs in excess of $1T, and only decrease the uninsured roles by 16million.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.