About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media deceptively claim stimulus funds going to "train station" that "hasn't been used in 30 years"

June 17, 2009 2:26 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Media figures repeated Sen. Tom Coburn's claim that stimulus funds are being used "to renovate an abandoned train station that hasn't been used in 30 years." But while the station house has long been closed, "[t]he station's platform currently serves more than 80,000 passengers a year," as Coburn's report noted.

11 Comments

On June 16 and 17, several media figures repeated Sen. Tom Coburn's (R-OK) claim that "[n]early $10 million" in stimulus funds is being used "to renovate an abandoned train station that hasn't been used in 30 years." In fact, as Coburn's own report on "100 stimulus projects" mentions, while the 97-year-old stone station house in Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, has been closed for 30 years, "[t]he station's platform currently serves more than 80,000 passengers a year." Indeed, the Elizabethtown Amtrak station has reportedly nearly doubled its number of passengers since 2003-2004 and, according to the Pennsylvania State Department of Transportation, has had the highest increase in ridership in the past two years of any station along the Keystone corridor. According to Amtrak, the facility has no station hours, no ticket office hours, and no Quik-Trak hours.

Moreover, according to various accounts, the Elizabethtown Amtrak stop does not currently comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If the station is not renovated to comply with the ADA by 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation has the right to shut it down -- a fact not mentioned in Coburn's report. Additionally, on April 4, the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal reported that "[Pennsylvania State Department of Transportation secretary Allen] Biehler said the Elizabethtown station was the perfect 'shovel-ready project' because it has been in the works for several years."

The following media figures have cited Coburn's claim that stimulus money will fund a "train station" that hasn't been used in 30 years, without noting that the station's platform is frequently used:

  • During the June 16 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, host Lou Dobbs said: "Tonight, a report that the Obama administration is wasting billions of your tax dollars on questionable projects in the federal stimulus package. That accusation comes from a Republican lawmaker who says he's identified 100 of the worst examples of waste." Correspondent Ines Ferré went on to report: "Among the projects highlighted in Coburn's report ... more than 9 million for an old train station in Pennsylvania that, according to Coburn, hasn't been used in 30 years."
  • On the June 16 edition of ABC's World News, Capitol Hill correspondent Jonathan Karl reported that "Senator Coburn issued a report today listing 100 stimulus projects he considers wasteful," including "nearly $10 million to fix up a train station in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, that hasn't been used in nearly 30 years." Karl added: "Local officials say the money will help them reopen the station, and increase ridership."
  • On the June 17 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, while talking about Coburn's report, co-host Steve Doocy commented: "How about a train station that has not been used in 30 years? Let's give them $10 million to fix it up. The check has already been cashed."

In his report, Coburn listed the Elizabethtown project as one of the "Top Ten" examples of waste in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The section of his report that addressed the project is titled: "Taxpayers Taken for a Ride: Nearly $10 Million to be Spent to Renovate a Century Old Train Station that Hasn't Been Used in 30 Years."

From the June 16 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight:

DOBBS: Tonight, a report that the Obama administration is wasting billions of your tax dollars on questionable projects in the federal stimulus package. That accusation comes from a Republican lawmaker who says he's identified 100 of the worst examples of waste. Ines Ferré has our report.

[begin video clip]

FERRÉ: It's been four months since the $787 billion stimulus bill was passed. One Republican senator is already calling out the government for 100 stimulus projects that he says are questionable or just pure waste.

COBURN: When I look at these things, I think about what would our grandchildren say. A dose of common sense on where this money goes is sorely lacking in this bill.

FERRÉ: Among the projects highlighted in Coburn's report: $3.4 million for a tunnel in Florida that will let turtles and other creatures cross a highway; $1 billion for FutureGen, a coal energy plant in Illinois that has been controversial even among environmentalists; more than 9 million for an old train station in Pennsylvania that, according to Coburn, hasn't been used in 30 years.

[end video clip]

From the June 16 edition of ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS (ABC News chief Washington correspondent): In your money tonight, how your tax dollars are being spent in the economic stimulus plan. One senator scoured the list and says he found millions of dollars in questionable projects. So, our Capitol Hill correspondent Jon Karl scrubbed it, too.

[...]

COBURN: We're borrowing money that we don't have to spend on things that we don't need in the name of economic stimulus, when there are things we could spend it on that we do need.

KARL: Senator Coburn issued a report today listing 100 stimulus projects he considers wasteful, including $578,000 for Union, New York, for homeless prevention, but town officials say they have no homeless problem. They're using the money to help seniors pay their energy bills. And nearly $10 million to fix up a train station in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, that hasn't been used in nearly 30 years. Local officials say the money will help them reopen the station, and increase ridership.

From the June 17 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

GRETCHEN CARLSON (co-host): And speaking of cash, let's talk a little bit about where some of your tax dollars went for that big stimulus plan, because you might be a little outraged this morning to find out that this town in New York, upstate New York, called Union, apparently the government thought they had a homeless problem and they give them 500 -- was it $500 million or --

DOOCY: Five-hundred and eighty thousand.

CARLSON: -- $580,000 for their homeless problem, and Union said, guess what? We don't have a homeless problem, but we'll make one so we can get the cash. And that's exactly what happened. They set up sort of a committee to figure out if they actually did have one, in a way to use the money. So how many other stinkers like that are out there?

[...]

DOOCY: How about a train station that has not been used in 30 years? Let's give them $10 million to fix it up. The check has already been cashed.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (June 17, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
      1  
      I actually like the other part better. Doing a study to determine if there is a homeless problem in Union, NY = making up a problem that doesn't exist.

      As for renovating a disused railway station: Do they think thy're going to renovate it and then just let it sit there unused? Please. They really need to find better writers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (June 17, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
        3  
        I like the way you think ;-)

        Further, if the platform currently serves 80,000 passengers a year, and has no station hours, no ticket office hours, and no Quik-Trak hours, is out of compliance with the Disability act, and renovations have been in the works for some years.....hmm, sounds like a good project and Sen. Coburn is a dadgum liar.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NG_Officer (June 17, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
          6  
          And wow, construction workers will be paid to make renovations, and these construction workers may even use some of the money they earn to purchase consumer goods from stores that employ other hard working Americans who will purchase goods with their paychecks, and so forth and so on...Sounds like it will stimulate the economy...what an interesting concept.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (June 17, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
            5  
            And after they renovate the station, they may be able to lease space in it to businesses such as a restaurant that can provide service to the customers as well as generate jobs and sales tax revenue to the town. I remember this was done a few years back to the train station in Dover, NJ when I lived there.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (June 17, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
          3  
          And those 80,000 passengers might save a little money on each ticket they buy in the station rather from the conductor on the train.

          A station might also mean more jobs for the area. The dimwitted senator doesn't mention that Lancaster is very popular with tourists and a renovated train station could help to bring even more of them to Lancaster County.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (June 17, 2009 6:07 pm ET)
        3  
        As for renovating a disused railway station...

        But it IS being used. That's the whole point-- the adjoining station house is abandoned right now but it is needed.

        In other words, it's a blatant lie to frame this project as unnecessary.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (June 17, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
      2  
      This is the type of Republican deception we need Media Matters to fight.

      I haven't seen anyone else respond to this, besides by linking to this webpage.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 17, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
      3  
      Sen Coburn has a preponderance of brain cells that haven't been used in 30 years, too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (June 17, 2009 5:01 pm ET)
      2  
      You expect political figures to lie (otherwise, how would they ever get elected). It used to be that you didn't expect the news media to lie. After all they were invested in presenting a fact-based system of communications that would lure viewers or listeners so they could sell stuff (this was their business model).

      Today, the business model has changed and they (the news media) have figured out that lying and making stuff up, in order to be entertaining, sells just as much stuff as telling the truth.

      The bonus is that lying is much cheaper to do and you don't have to worry about hiring real journalist to check facts. As long as the people reading the news look good, they can have the journalistic instincts of a gerbil.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by galinelli (June 18, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
           
        It doesn't hurt to look over spending like this. But there is more than one side to this. If the pros out
        way the cons then go forward. I feel there is a lot more to consider than just one mans opinion. But we as citizens should get involved and speak up and critque spending as it happens. This seems to be a worth while project. So lets get to the next one and quit debating this to death.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.