About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity falsely claimed Bill Clinton wrote op-ed criticizing Bush days before 2001 inauguration

June 19, 2009 8:31 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Sean Hannity falsely claimed that President Clinton "had an op-ed in January 15th, before George Bush was sworn in, criticizing George Bush." In fact, Clinton referred to the incoming Bush administration in his op-ed only when he urged it "to appoint a nonpartisan presidential commission on electoral reform."

20 Comments

Addressing "all this talk" that former President Bush "needs to be quiet," Sean Hannity falsely claimed on the June 18 edition of his Fox News program that former President Bill Clinton "had an op-ed in January 15th, before George Bush was sworn in, criticizing George Bush." In fact, in his op-ed, published by The New York Times on January 14, 2001, Clinton did not criticize Bush; rather, he outlined a series of recommendations he would make on Martin Luther King Jr. Day to advance the "struggle for equal justice in America." The only instance in which Clinton even referred to the incoming Bush administration in the op-ed was when he wrote, "I urge the new administration to appoint a nonpartisan presidential commission on electoral reform," after noting that "[i]n the presidential election of 2000, too many people felt the votes they cast were not counted, and some felt there were organized efforts to keep them from the polls."

From Clinton's January 14, 2001, New York Times op-ed, "Erasing America's Color Lines":

My message to Congress makes recommendations in a number of areas. For example, there is perhaps no area today in which perceptions of fairness differ so greatly, depending on one's race, than the administration of criminal justice.

If you are white, you most likely believe the system is fair. If you belong to a minority group, you most likely feel the opposite. If we want to keep crime coming down, we need to instill trust in our criminal justice system.

We can begin by ending the practice of racial profiling. We know racial profiling exists. We know it is wrong. And it should be illegal, everywhere. As we continue our efforts to document the extent of the problem, we should pass a federal law banning the practice of racial profiling.

We should also re-examine our federal sentencing policies, particularly mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent offenders. We should immediately reduce the disparity between crack and powder-cocaine sentences. And we should pass legislation to provide greater access to DNA testing and competent counsel for defendants in death penalty cases.

The struggle for equal justice in America also includes the struggle for voting rights. In the presidential election of 2000, too many people felt the votes they cast were not counted, and some felt there were organized efforts to keep them from the polls.

We must do more to ensure that more people vote and that every vote is counted. To that end, I urge the new administration to appoint a nonpartisan presidential commission on electoral reform, headed by distinguished citizens like former presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Such a commission should gather facts and determine the causes -- in every state -- of voting disparities, including those involving race, class and ethnicity. It should make recommendations to Congress about how to achieve fair, inclusive and uniform standards for voting and vote counting. It should also work to prevent voter suppression and intimidation and to increase voter participation.

Here are two places to start: We should make Election Day a national holiday. And it is long past time to give back the right to vote to ex-offenders who have paid their debts to society.

From the June 18 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: President Bush has now spoken out on a lot of issues: on enhanced interrogations; he spoke out about the economy, and he said it's going to be the private sector that leads the country out of the current economic crisis.

KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE (Fox News host and legal analyst): Right.

HANNITY: You can't - you can spend your money better than the government. It's resonating.

GUILFOYLE: It's true.

HANNITY: It is true.

GUILFOYLE: It's a fact that's supported by historical evidence, so why are we going to go backwards, OK, to the horse and buggy era when we should be moving forward with innovative ideas and following the best practices that have actually resulted in improvements in the lives of the American people? Hello?

S.E. CUPP (columnist): That's right. I mean, and President Bush doesn't really have anything to lose or gain here. He's not running for office again.

GUILFOYLE: No.

CUPP: I think he believes that this is sincerely the best way to fix the country. And by the way, can we just say, what a classy guy.

HANNITY: Yeah.

CUPP: What a class act. Barack Obama --

GUILFOYLE: A gentleman.

CUPP: -- is still on the "Blame Bush Express."

HANNITY: Yeah.

CUPP: He needs to get off the campaign trail and take some responsibility --

GUILFOYLE: The "BBE."

CUPP: -- for the stuff that he's doing right now.

HANNITY: I went back -- Bill Clinton, before George Bush ever became president, had an op-ed in January 15th, before George Bush was sworn in, criticizing George Bush. You know, for all this talk, "Oh, George Bush needs to be quiet" -- now he defended enhanced interrogations. He said it was lawful. He did it to protect this country. He said he wasn't going to sell out this country for short-term political gain. That --

CUPP: It's -- you know, it's perfectly within his purview and his right to defend his policies and criticize the current policies. I think that's completely within his right. I don't think he was slighting Obama.

GUILFOYLE: No.

CUPP: You know, he's a class act.

GUILFOYLE: He's a gentleman and a class act. He always has been, he always will be, and he should never apologize for protecting Americans.

CUPP: That's right.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (June 19, 2009 8:47 am ET)
      5  
      what a bunch of ass kissers. and they still want to ignore the "unprecedented access" they got to the bush WH while claiming abc gets it to the obama WH? pathetic.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bigtmoney (June 19, 2009 8:50 am ET)
      6  
      Me thinks "The Colbert Report" has more journalistic integrity than "the Hannity Comedy Hour"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TheThief672 (June 19, 2009 9:01 am ET)
      3  
      Hannity to English Dictionary -
      Falsely Claimed = Facts to Hannity
      Lying = Facts to Hannity
      Misinformation = Facts to Hannity
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (June 19, 2009 9:21 am ET)
      7  
      Hannity "falsely claimed"..if I only had a nickel for everytime he spoke and "falsely claimed" something, I would be complaining about Obama raising my taxes because I would accumulate over $250,000 a year.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pklute63 (June 19, 2009 9:35 am ET)
        5  
        I was thinking the same thing....has there ever been a lead in that said, "Hannity correctly claims"?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (June 19, 2009 10:07 am ET)
          5  
          Not likely. He's been very busy racking up bad karma for many moons. It's hard to imagine how much bile his liver has to process on a daily basis.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 19, 2009 10:11 am ET)
      6  
      I was actually watching Olbermann last night when they were talking about this subject of past Presidents criticizing current Presidents, and Keith expressed it well I think. He essentially said, "Why not?"

      He made a good point. Presidents past, are private citizens once again. They have the experience of the office. They're more than likely, voters. Why shouldn't they criticize, or agree with what a current President is doing? It's good for democracy for them to do it.

      Agree, or disagree, their opinions, I would think, would hold a lot more water than just about anyone elses.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by giniajim (June 19, 2009 10:40 am ET)
        4  
        I think caution is still the watchword here. Past Presdidents may be very sensitive to how their term is viewed in retrospect and their "opinions" may not be totally unbiased. I don't give them any more automatic credence than I give any other commentator. I certainly don't trust Bush now any more than I trusted him the last eight years. The crass attempts by Cheney et al to try to burnish his legacy are so transparently self-serving. In fact, the future analysis of the Bush43 presidency will have to start with the understanding that the *real* president was a Rove-Cheney tag team. Bush43 was in no way an independent person and was president in name only (my humble opinion of course).
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (June 19, 2009 11:32 am ET)
        3  
        Except Clinton didn't actually criticize Dubya. Well he did give a mild criticism of how he handled the Iraq war but that was much later.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by zardoz237630 (June 19, 2009 10:17 am ET)
      4  
      Why pay any attention to this AH. Who cares what he says. When every day brings us a 'special edition' of this used car salesmanlike crap, when it's people like this that are destroying the GOP, not for any idealogical reason but for self promotion....We should ignore him. That's the only way to marginalize this gluttonous gas bag. "I don't care what's best for the Country, I'm more concerned with what's good for 'Conservatism'" - Limbaugh
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (June 19, 2009 11:13 am ET)
      5  
      Hannity is a buffoon... he gets away with his "falsely claims" because nobody calls him on it and he surrounds himself with sycophants and his fans don't care if he lies or not, they just want to feel good about their twisted ideas and Hannity delivers
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (June 19, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
        2  
        What else would Hannity have to do if he couldn't lie?...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Entitled (June 19, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
             
          He could actually title his content as fiction and continue to spin fabulous stories and no one would get mad.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (June 19, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
      2  
      these folks talk in such circles that even the likes of Pythagoras, Newton, and Leibniz would be hard pressed to deconstruct.
      Where's my Ibuprofen...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (June 19, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
      3  
      but don't we all know clinton is a liar? or so the theory goes. yes, he lied about an affair. and bush has lied multiple times through the years that he had no choice but to invade iraq because saddam "wouldn't let the inspectors in". which of course, is a complete fabrication. they were there, going to the sites we sent them to, and finding nothing. they were pulled out because bush told the u.n. we were going to invade and their people should not be there when we did. why anyone listens after all these years to bush, the chronic liar and incompetent, is beyond reason.

      don't forget. "he kept us safe". no, there were many warnings that a major attack was coming in 2001 and bush, cheney, condi, and ashcroft all deliberately ignored the warnings.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (June 19, 2009 10:48 pm ET)
         
      CUPP: What a class act. Barack Obama --

      GUILFOYLE: A gentleman.

      CUPP: -- is still on the "Blame Bush Express."

      HANNITY: Yeah.

      CUPP: He needs to get off the campaign trail and take some responsibility --

      GUILFOYLE: The "BBE."

      CUPP: -- for the stuff that he's doing right now.



      What??!!

      Are you telling me I CAN'T blame a president whose term ended a scant five months ago for starting two wars of choice, emptying the treasury, and tarnishing the USA's reputation during his EIGHT YEARS in office??

      OK, fine -- I just don't wanna hear Guilfoyle, Cupp, or Hannity say anything about Dumbya's "legacy."

      The "party of personal responsibility" strikes again . . .
      Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (June 20, 2009 7:37 pm ET)
           
        You know Hannity is lying if his lips are moving.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by robyn20094113 (June 21, 2009 1:57 am ET)
             
          Hannity coward, sure plays it safe theses days, knows his guest will agree with his every word. No one will mention water-boarding.
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.