About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox's Kelly repeats discredited falsehood about stimulus funds for "abandoned train station"

June 23, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Megyn Kelly twice repeated the discredited falsehood that "nearly 10 million bucks" in stimulus funds is going to "renovate an abandoned train station that no one uses."

13 Comments

During the June 23 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, co-host Megyn Kelly twice repeated the discredited falsehood that "nearly 10 million bucks" in stimulus funds is going to "renovate an abandoned train station that no one uses." Kelly sourced the claim to Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), who stated in a report detailing purportedly wasteful stimulus projects that "[n]early $10 million" in stimulus funds is being used "to renovate an abandoned train station that hasn't been used in 30 years." However, as Media Matters for America previously noted, Coburn's own report notes that while the station house in question has been closed for 30 years, "[t]he station's platform currently serves more than 80,000 passengers a year," which is reportedly nearly double the number who used the station in 2003-04.

Despite the large number of passengers using the station, according to Amtrak, the facility has no station hours, no ticket office hours, and no Quik-Trak hours. Moreover, according to various accounts, the Elizabethtown Amtrak stop does not currently comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If the station is not renovated to comply with the ADA by 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation has the right to shut it down -- a fact not mentioned in Coburn's report.

In his report, Coburn listed the Elizabethtown project as one of the "Top Ten" examples of waste in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The section of his report that addressed the project is titled: "Taxpayers Taken for a Ride: Nearly $10 Million to be Spent to Renovate a Century Old Train Station that Hasn't Been Used in 30 Years."

From the June 23 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:

KELLY: Well, the president promised to, quote, "call out any wasteful spending" he sees under his $787 billion stimulus plan. Now we learn that nearly 10 million bucks has gone to renovate an abandoned train station that no one uses, 10,000 dead people got stimulus checks, and millions have been spent to help turtles cross a road. So what is the White House saying now?

[...]

KELLY: But I just want our viewers to know, because we've ticked off a couple of these things that Coburn has highlighted, which the White House -- some of which it disputes, and the others it defends, it says these are good things. Like $800,000 for the little-used John Murtha Airport in Johnstown --

STU VARNEY (Fox Business Network host): Yeah. Yeah.

KELLY: -- they wanted to repave a backup runway -- they're calling this the airport for nobody; 3.4 million for a wildlife eco-passage in Florida that takes the animals safely under a busy highway; $10 million to renovate an abandoned train station that hasn't been used in 30 years, Stu.

VARNEY: What is wasteful? What is silly? Those are value judgments and it depends -- which side you come down on depends upon which side of the aisle you're talking about.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (June 23, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
      5  
      This is nothing new. Fox anchors routinely pimp discredited talking points. Sometimes for years.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (June 23, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
        7  
        Yea...I hear that China is drilling for oil off the coast of Cuba as we speak. And Barack Obama said he wants to attack our ally Pakistan. You won't hear that in the MSM...only on FOX.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by LarryE (June 23, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
      4  
      Just another example of one of my "rules of engagement" for wingers seeking to avoid debate on the actual issues at hand; in this case, it's Rule #11:

      "When a claim of yours has been debunked, continue to use it nonetheless. When it has been debunked so thoroughly and completely that continuing to use it is counterproductive, stop claiming it for a time, perhaps a few months, after which assert it again as if the debunking had never happened."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (June 23, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
        2  
        I thought that was rule #1. Oh wait. Rule #2. Rule #1 is "Blame Clinton."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by LarryE (June 24, 2009 3:51 am ET)
          1 1
          Rule #1 is "Blame Clinton."

          :-) Actually, Rule #1 is "Deny, deny, deny."
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mybrotherskeeper (June 23, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
        4
      I hope this was just an honest mistake, a case of her strong convictions having outpaced her level of information. Because I think there is something very likable about Megyn (with a 'y') Kelly.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kesmarn47074 (June 24, 2009 8:36 am ET)
        3  
        I think the only strong conviction she has is that her career is the most important thing in the universe and she will do or say anything necessary to advance it. People like Kelly, Hasselbeck and Megan McCain use their looks as a tool to advance the Murdock/Limbaugh/Gingrich agenda and it's amazing how many people fall for that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (June 23, 2009 8:02 pm ET)
        3
      $10 Million to bring it into ADA compliance or $10 Million to add some possible retail spots within the building as well? $10 Million seems like a lot for a couple of ramps.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rrastro (June 23, 2009 10:16 pm ET)
        2  
        if doors in load bearing walls need enlarged the cost increase fast
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rrastro (June 23, 2009 10:10 pm ET)
      2  
      I have to say this: indianapolis had an abandoned train station, invested funds and the station thrived as a shopping center until a competitor opened in a better, yet nearby, location.

      Sometimes, oft times, if something is unused there is a reason some money can fix....that is EVEN IF it was really abandoned
      Report Abuse
      • Author by njguy93 (June 24, 2009 6:22 am ET)
        2  
        Is that you rrastro? Where have you been? Its been a LONG time since I've seen a post from you on here. You and I go back to 2004, the first months of Media Matters for America. I remember when it was you and Leatherhelmet who were the only two conservatives on here. Those were the days. How is Leatherhelmet? Have you heard from him lately? Does he still come on here? I don't know if you remember me or not.

        THANK YOU.
        njguy93@yahoo.com
        Report Abuse
    • Author by egb (June 24, 2009 3:04 am ET)
        3
      Waste isn't the issue. Investment is. Renovating a railroad station is like an unemployment benefit, only there is some useful result (the renovated RR station). However, once completed, the RR station produces nothing of value for the economy. Fixing roads and bridges has the same effect. Projects like that put people to work for 6 months or a year, but don't result in anything that grows the economy. Once the project is done, the local economy goes back to where it was prior to the project.

      Stimulus should stimulate. Bridges, roads and railroad stations temporize but don't produce any long term GDP content.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (June 24, 2009 5:24 am ET)
        4  
        Guess we should halt all spending on transportation infrastructure, after all when the work is done, there is no benefit.

        Lets just go back to the rutted dirt roads that were typical 75 or 80 years ago, we don't need no stinking roads.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace