Wash. Post misleads on Medicare cost growth
SUMMARY: The Washington Post suggested that the rising cost of Medicare and Medicaid is driven primarily by the aging of the American population. But the CBO has found that the principal factor behind these rising costs is the "growth in per capita costs rather than from the aging of the population."
In a June 25 article, The Washington Post suggested that the rising cost of Medicare and Medicaid is driven primarily by the aging of the U.S. population. Contrary to the Post's suggestion, however, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has found that the principal factor behind upward trajectory of Medicare and Medicaid costs is the growth in per-capita health care costs "over and above demographic effects." The Post article, which reported on recent Medicare fraud indictments, stated that "[t]he cost of Medicare, which covers the elderly and disabled, and Medicaid, its sister program for the poor, are growing as the American population ages, giving new urgency to initiatives to detect and prevent phony claims." But a December 2008 CBO study concluded that "[m]ost of that increase" in federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid over the next 40 years "will result from growth in per capita costs rather than from the aging of the population." The CBO also stated that the effect of the increase in enrollment caused by the baby boom generation becoming eligible for Medicare "pales in comparison with the likely impact of continued increases in health care spending per enrollee."
The CBO study, "Key issues in Analyzing Major Health Insurance Proposals," stated:
The rising costs of health care and health insurance pose a serious threat to the future fiscal condition of the United States. Under current policies, CBO projects that federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid will increase from about 4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009 to nearly 6 percent in 2019 and 12 percent by 2050. Most of that increase will result from growth in per capita costs rather from the aging of the population.
The study later stated:
[T]he impending eligibility of the baby-boom generation will have a substantial effect on the share of GDP devoted to Medicare as a result of the increase in enrollment, but that effect pales in comparison with the likely impact of continued increases in health care spending per enrollee. According to CBO's analysis, future demographic changes will account for somewhere between one-fifth and one-third of the increase in federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid over the next 25 to 75 years, and rising outlays per enrollee (over and above demographic effects) will account for the remainder.
From the June 25 Washington Post article:
Federal agents arrested dozens of people in Miami and Detroit for allegedly submitting Medicare claims for $50 million in treatments that were unneeded and sometimes never provided, authorities said.
The indictments returned by a grand jury in Detroit focus mostly on costly HIV-AIDS infusion drugs and physical and occupational therapy. Authorities filed criminal charges against patients, doctors, medical assistants and company owners who allegedly played complicit roles in the fraud schemes. Prosecutors are seeking forfeiture of the criminal proceeds and restitution to the Medicare program.
The cost of Medicare, which covers the elderly and disabled, and Medicaid, its sister program for the poor, are growing as the American population ages, giving new urgency to initiatives to detect and prevent phony claims.
The action was announced at a news conference in the District by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, a signal that the Obama administration is giving the issue high priority as it pushes for legislative reforms in health care.

















upon pretending to be a journalist and going out and looking up numbers, one finds that that worthy organization, the department of Homeland Security, has for the fy2009 an annual budget of 50.5 billion dollars, which extrapolated over the mythical and magical figure of 10 years equals round about 1/2 a trillion dollars. Now if one was to add the Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA, and the intelligence agencies of the Department of Defense, and assume conservatively that they only get 80% of the bloated budget of our beloved Homeland security, we come to a total of 1616000000000+that other half a trillion--
2 something trillion over ten years for organisations whose primary responsibility is collecting information, yeh, yeh, sometimes they do other stuff. Still, one might note that since we don't know what information they collect, it might be assumed that some of that information is primarily about Americans...
not to mention that we spend more on Defense than the rest of the world put together...
I think I read the other day that the house of representatives voted themselves 80 bill to play with this year...representatives, bit of a misnomer doncha think?
one would like to think, that since it appears that the panic stricken opposition party and its minions can add & subtract imaginary numbers, it would behoove the third estate, if such exists, to compile some of their own as an illustration of their ultimate meaninglessness.
The Wa. Post is one of many media outlets that won't offer a comprehensive story about medical care. They cough up the sad stories occasionally, but when it covers policy, they go to Republican spin and Democratic replies, and all the politics.
And what about that medicare drug bill with the infamous donut hole? It still hasn't been repaired. It still leaves medicare without the ability to get the best prices for drugs thanks to Bill Tauzin and the Republicans. Reforming THAT bill could save the taxpayer money.
Now the drug companies are running ads stating how well this bill has worked for all the happy seniors arranging flowers and smiling in their middle class dining rooms. Ugh.
Gotta love the CBO. Between on-fifth and one-third of the increase? Those aren't exactly hard numbers friends.
Yes, the cost per enrollee is going up. But the number of enrollees is also going up. Now add 43 million uninsured who will add to both the cost per enrollee and the number of enrollees. Next add the countless millions who will be forced into the government plan when their employers see they can drop their group plans, forcing those employees into the government plan. More enrollees more cost per enrollee.
It is an unworkable plan. Medicaid and Social Security are already underfunded by trillions of dollars of unfunded promises. Why on earth would anyone trust the government for their healthcare, when the government is already proposing cutting benefits based on age and medical conditions in order to save money?
Yes, healthcare costs need to be reformed, but creating more government bureaucracies will only raise costs further and lower quality health care for all of us.
If the government program will not save money for the anyone then the aggregate HealthCorp will trundle along in its merry profit making way.
Point to a socialized medical program anywhere in the world which costs within a thousand dollars of the cost per capita that we pay currently.
Does your version of of reform in this arena mean anything but maintaining the staus quo?