About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

MSNBC, Fox tease White House meeting on immigration by showing footage of border-crossers

June 25, 2009 11:54 am ET

SUMMARY: In teasing a White House meeting on immigration, MSNBC and Fox News again aired footage of people apparently crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally, despite the fact that such footage largely distorts the issue.

75 Comments

In teasing the White House meeting on immigration later in the day, MSNBC and Fox News again aired footage of immigrants jumping over fences. However, as Media Matters for America has noted, this frequent and long-standing practice by media of featuring footage of people apparently crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally -- jumping border fences, hiking through the desert, or being pursued or detained by law-enforcement officials in what appears to be the vicinity of a border -- largely distorts the issue. It does not address in any meaningful way the reality of their lives or the nation's challenges in dealing with the issue. Moreover, the footage does not even capture the common experience of undocumented immigrants, nearly half of whom, according to a Pew Hispanic Center report, entered the country legally.

As Media Matters noted, during a segment on immigration reform on the June 24 edition of Special Report, Fox News ran a graphic stating, "Run For The Border," while airing footage of what appeared to be immigrants in the vicinity of a border fence.

From the 9 a.m. ET hour of MSNBC Live on June 25:

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

From the June 25 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:

j

k

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by latanza (June 25, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
         
      Okay, but do you see any Americans crossing over? We didn't say that we would patrol Mexico for the Mexicans. We asked for cooperation at the military and government level. Do we in fact need to encourage the Mexican government to re-commit to the idea of dual responsibility for the problem. We have operated in good faith but maybe MSNBC should be showing this footage to the Mexican government and not mocking the policies of the President. The only use this could be is to forewarn the President that he is being taken as a patsy and should enforce some sanctions.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
      2 5
      "It does not address in any meaningful way the reality of their lives"

      What the hell does that mean? So we are supposed to look the other way and open our borders because of the reality of their lives? If they enter illegally and stay here they are breaking our laws, that's the reality.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bwither012965 (June 25, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
        5 1
        What the hell does that mean?

        It means it leaves out a lot of the story. Particularly, the part of the story where many of these migrants are being guided into the United States by coyotes working for American companies that like using the abject poor of Mexico for cheap labor rather than pay Americans a decent wage for what is often dangerous work.

        We don't have an illegal immigration problem in the United States, we have an illegal EMPLOYER problem. Make the penalties for bringing in people from other countries for the purposes of exploitation stern enough to force compliance, and the immigration part of it will take care of itself.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (June 25, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
             
          Those coyotes will have to work harder for their blood money. More Latinos are heading back home these days than are crossing into America.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
          1 2
          I am in complete agreement with full prosecutions of those who hire illegally, driving down the price of labor and hurting the poorest citizens the most. No argument there. This is what I find such a contradiction for many on the left, they say they look out for the working poor and their wages, but they don't strongly condemn politicians who look the other way at this problem which is suppressing their wages even more. Don't they realize who they are hurting?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bwither012965 (June 25, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
            3 1
            The problem is that conservative media has turned the conversation about how- to paraphrase Pat Buchanan and Lou Dobbs- Mexico is waging a proxy war against us through its immigrants. The mainstream conservative line on immigration reform is bigger fences and more guards at the border, without regard to the fact that desperate people will find a way across no matter how tough the road is- hundred of people crossed back and forth between East and West Germany in spite of the small army guarding the border. The mainstream conservative platform on immigration has nothing in it about punishing companies that knowingly break the law as the price of doing business.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
              1 4
              That may be, but I have no dog in the conservative media platform. But what also cannot be denied are some of the shameful tactics from the left, calling those who are concerned with border enforcement racists. That is just as big a problem.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (June 25, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
                2 1
                Well, there are a lot of people who are "concerned" about the border that are racists, as evidenced by what they say about it (not necessarily you, but there are plenty of examples to go around, just watch Dobbs for one).

                When I hear people talking about closing the border, they almost always talk about those "dirty hispanics", and other such tripe that tumbles from their mouths.

                I do agree that we have to punish to COMPANIES hiring these folks, because, if you take away what they came here for, then there is a good chance that they'll stop coming. No jobs, and no reason to head over the border illegally.

                I also realize that the vast majority of illegal aliens who are here are decent and upstanding people, who work hard, and are just trying to make a life for themselves here. They pay taxes normally under fake social security numbers, have good families, work hard, and lead quiet lives.

                But I do believe that a lot of the folks I hear talking about enforcing the borders are just outright racist.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
                    3
                  "When I hear people talking about closing the border, they almost always talk about those "dirty hispanics", and other such tripe that tumbles from their mouths"

                  I don't.

                  So we are supposed to concede the issue to either those who want relaxed borders, or the racists who hate Mexicans? Sorry, there are fringes on all sides of issues and that is not the good faith positions that those without such motives should be saddled with. It's unfair, unproductive and solves nothing, for anyone.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
                    3  
                    You have to admit a lot of people on the right are xenophobic.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
                      1 3
                      You can say it all you want, it doesn't address the point made by those who aren't. Which is what I said.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
                        2  
                        I was specially addressing the post I replied to. A lot of people on the right are xenophobes or fear that America is turning browner. The best route to curb illegal immigration is to start criminalizing employers and I hear little of that from conservatives.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
                          1 3
                          loonz,

                          Here are the stats I found:

                          The US population totaled 281 million in 2000. About 35 million, or 12.5 percent, were Latino. The Census Bureau projects that our population will reach 439 million in 2050, a 56 percent increase over the 2000 census. The Hispanic population in 2050 is projected at 133 million – 30 percent of the total and almost quadruple the 2000 level....

                          http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
                        1 3
                        The National Academy of Sciences estimated that each immigrant will result in a $100,000 net annual cost to taxpayers...

                        ...Nineteen percent of federal inmates are not citizens...

                        ...Thirty percent of public health patients in the county are illegal immigrants, he testified.

                        http://www.10news.com/news/9620142/detail.html
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 5:49 pm ET)
                          1  
                          What was the purpose in posing that?
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
                          2  
                          It's funny that you mention the study as a way to improve your credibility (good luck with that) but then instead quote from an article that mentions the study. Where's the link to the study itself?
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by LuvLuLu (June 26, 2009 10:50 am ET)
                        1  
                        You let RightON take you down the rabbit hole again!

                        Why?
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
                  1 3
                  Mags,

                  The issue is not that some of the people coming here are decent and upstanding, it is that we cannot survive as a country when we, as a country, have to support millions of people who pay little or no taxes while consuming billions of dollars of services.

                  It would be great if everyone wanting to come to America could do so, but that is an impossibility. It is much better for our country to allow skilled and educated people in, so they can add to wealth of the country rather than, low skilled, low educated types that are an expense. Check out these statistics.

                  the education costs for children of illegal aliens is about $34.5 billion per year.

                  In 1980, our Federal and state facilities held fewer than 9,000 criminal aliens but at the end of 2003, approximately 267,000 illegal aliens were incarcerated in U.S. correctional facilities, as follows

                  * 46,000 in Federal prisons
                  * 74,000 in state prisons
                  * 147,000 in local jails
                  http://www.usillegalaliens.com/impacts_of_illegal_immigration_crime.html

                  A 1998 National Academy of Sciences study found that more than 30 percent of California's foreign-born were on Medicaid—including 37 percent of all Hispanic households - compared with 14 percent of native-born households. The foreign-born were more than twice as likely as the native-born to be on welfare, and their children were nearly five times as likely to be in means-tested government lunch programs. Native-born households pay for much of this, the study found, because they earn more and pay higher taxes - and are more likely to comply with tax laws. Recent immigrants, by contrast, have much lower levels of income and tax compliance (another study estimated that only 56 percent of illegals in California have taxes deducted from their earnings, for instance). The study's conclusion: immigrant families cost each native-born household in California an additional $1,200 a year in taxes.

                  he bottom line is that all immigrants, legal and illegal, use welfare more than natives, uneducated immigrants use welfare even more, and if illegal immigrants are legalized through amnesty they will use twice as much welfare as they are currently using.

                  http://www.usillegalaliens.com/impacts_of_illegal_immigration_american_infrastructure.html
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
                    3 1
                    They get assistance from the state because their children are native born. Would you rather the children starve to death or die from some illness?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
                      1 4
                      Hahaha... Would you rather be struck by lightening or run over by Obama?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
                        2  
                        He wasn't presenting that as an either/or scenario. He's noting two things that could happen from a lack of assistance.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
                            3
                          Brab,

                          I wasn't presenting an either/or example. I was illustrating his absurdity.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
                            3  
                            What the hell is "struck by lightning or run over by Obama" then? What single thing would cause either of those things to happen? I don't see the absurdity in recognizing that a lack of assistance could result in starvation or illness, and you're not making a good faith effort to demonstrate that. Please do better, if you're able. Thank you.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
                                3
                              Brab,

                              Obviously you don't get it.

                              The assumption that just because a child does not get assistance from the State means that the child will either die by starvation or illness is simply ludicrous.

                              How much assistance from the State did your parent's get when you were born? Apparently you did neither of the above.

                              Loonz presented a "forced choice" that was so outlandish only a liberal would fall for it. :-)

                              Hahaha... Thanks for making my day!
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Brabantio (June 25, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
                                3  
                                It's not a "forced choice". My parents didn't need state assistance. Obviously people that do are in a different situation, and there could be dire results from a lack of such assistance.

                                I really don't see what's ludicrous about this concept, and I don't think you do either.
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 5:52 pm ET)
                                1  
                                You think people are on public assistance for the hell of it? If they don't get assistance what do you think will happen to them?
                                Report Abuse
                          • Author by solon (June 25, 2009 10:03 pm ET)
                            2  
                            No you werent. You were giving an example of YOUR absurdity
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by solon (June 25, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
                        2  
                        You are becoming so pathetic. So many of your arguments are dishonest or flat out stupid. Dont you get embarassed by how inane you have become?
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
                    2  
                    ..have to support millions of people who pay little or no taxes while consuming billions of dollars of services.
                    Actually, you are wrong. It's been proven that illegals actually put more money into the economy than they take out. See, they don't use a lot of the government services because they are afraid to get caught.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
                        2
                      Got any link to back up that assertion?
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
                      1 1
                      I have some that refute your assertion.

                      George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.

                      The healthcare cost of the illegal workforce is especially burdensome, and is subsidized by taxpayers. To claim Medicaid, you must be legal, but as the Health and Human Services inspector general found, 47 states allow self-declaration of status for Medicaid. Many hospitals and clinics are going broke because of the constant stream of uninsured, many of whom are the estimated 12 million to 15 million illegal immigrants. This translates into reduced services, particularly for lower-income citizens.

                      http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
                        2 1
                        The healthcare cost of the illegal workforce is especially burdensome, and is subsidized by taxpayers.
                        We're benefiting from their cheap labor, why shouldn't we subsidize their health care?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
                          1 2
                          Tell that to the American citizen who is fighting for his own wages and is now being displaced by an illegal immigrant who will work for far less by a crooked employer. Where is your compassion for them, or is it all just an act?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 7:02 pm ET)
                            2 1
                            I'm just correcting AA's invalid assertions. If there's going to be a responsible debate about solving the problem, we need to have access to real information, not xenophobia-fueled exaggerations.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by mefirst (June 25, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
                            1 1
                            thom hartmann, who is by anyone's definition liberal, says the same thing about immigration. it's an endless supply of cheap labor that undermines the workers already here. as he points out, union membership was highest in this country in the fifties, when immigration was a trickle of what it is now. nor do the taxes paid make up for all the expenses, particularly schools.
                            Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (June 25, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
                2 1
                No it isnt as big a problem that is ludicrous. There is no denying there are racists and xenophobes on the con side of the bandwagon. If the left is calling people racists for no other reason THAN them being there that is wrong. I personally saw the guy who drew a cartoon about turning Mexicans into heating oil come here to MMFA and try to weasel his way out of the clear racism he was espousing. Boooooretz is astonishingly racist. We should be careful with the broadbrush it is an easy argument but one that shuts down realy discourse. I certainly dont think all those in a lather about illegal immigration are racists and never use that argument except against the actual racists. They know who they are.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
              1 2
              bwither,

              Your statement: "hundred of people crossed back and forth between East and West Germany in spite of the small army guarding the border." proves right ONs point.

              hundreds crossing the border versus millions is a very compelling argument for fences and border patrols.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
                1 1
                hundreds crossing the border versus millions is a very compelling argument for fences and border patrols.
                I'd never thought I'd see anyone try to celebrate the tactics and brutality of the Eastern German police, but there you go. Cons rise below any level of decency when attempting to make a point. Sad thing is, they end up not making the point and losing their dignity at the same time.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
                  1 2
                  Obviously this is way too complicated an issue for you to understand, considering the hysterics you just posted. Perhaps you'd better find another topic.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
                    1 1
                    I understand completely. AA thinks that we should use similar tactics to the East German police when cracking down on our border. Simple as that. By your "defense" of poor helpless AA, I'll assume you agree with his repugnant suggestion.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
                      1 1
                      AA can defend himself, but how anyone could get what you just did from he wrote is mind-boggling. Unless you are just a pointless contrarian, oh wait. Now I understand where you're coming from.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 3:54 pm ET)
                        2 1
                        hundreds crossing the border versus millions is a very compelling argument for fences and border patrols.
                        Here's AA's statement. In order to control the border the way the East Germans did, you'd have to be as brutal as they were. It wasn't just the fences, it was the machine gun nests and the cold calculating killers that manned them.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
                      1 3
                      Mags,

                      Nice try but you are again wrong. I only used bwither's example to make a point. That is clear to any who are reading this thread.

                      Your purposeful misreading of my post only shows you are not arguing in good faith.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
                          3
                        ps. I like your flag!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
                          1  
                          I figure if the right can use the flag, so can I. Next, I'll take a picture of myself wrapped in it for good measure.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
                              3
                            Not very original, but I guess that beats tearing it to shreds like you normally do. ;-)
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
                                 
                              Wrong. It's that sort of bombast that does your kind no service.
                              Report Abuse
                            • Author by solon (June 26, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
                                 
                              THIS from the hypocrite who so often snivels piteously that liberals are so mean and call him names WWWWWAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
                        1  
                        By the way, who is "Mags". Magnoialover hasn't posted on this topic to my knowledge. Looks like you've lost what was left of any mind you had at one time.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
                            3
                          Looks like you need glasses. Go look near the top.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by solon (June 26, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
                              1
                            YOU need a functional cerebral cortex, a sense of decency, some honesty would be nice. In fact you have become such a worthless troll that the things you need is quite a list.
                            Report Abuse
                        • Author by anotheramerican (June 25, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
                            2
                          ps. OYGB - I should have addressed that post to you.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by LuvLuLu (June 26, 2009 10:57 am ET)
                               
                            Ya think? What a tool. Instead of simply admitting your error, you make a non-relevant assertion that MagnoliaLove had actually posted previously. You replied to one person, calling him another poster's name. But you had to throw out an irrelevant attack.
                            Report Abuse
              • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
                2  
                We don't have to build walls. We need to criminalize employers of illegal immigrants.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by wesley (June 25, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
        1 2
        -- If they enter illegally and stay here they are breaking our laws, that's the reality. -- rightOn

        Well done. Your statement cuts right to the chase and avoids the trap of the weak-kneed psycho-babbling about the issues facing our country...a country that has been overrun by illegal aliens.

        Step up enforcement at the border...punish all employers that are hiring illegal aliens...deport illegal aliens every time and every where they are found.

        The problem won't be corrected overnight because it didn't happen overnight...but we can sure as hell get started.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
          2  
          Are you a Native American?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
            1 2
            I knew this topic was above your pay grade. The issue is ILLEGAL immigration, not immigration itself. Off base is where you live, isn't it?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by loonz (June 25, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
              1 1
              Barack is saying anyone who is not Native American is an illegal immigrant. I tend to agree.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by southerngal (June 25, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
                1 1
                That is ridiculous. So you see no difference in someone who ilegally enters this country and hides, than someone who follows our immigration laws and goes through the process legally? I know liberals parse words for a living, but that takes the cake..LOL!!

                And you of all posters, who just yesterday demanded everyone have a decent wage, can sit there and justify illegal immigration when it is driving down the price of labor for the poorest among us. So that was just blustering nonsense you posted yesterday, or this is today. Because the two are as far apart as you can get.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
                  1  
                  You are assuming that Wes's ancestor's came here legally. That's a big assumption.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bruce1ace (June 26, 2009 7:52 am ET)
                    1  
                    Children born in this country by illegal immigrants are automatically US Citizens. I thought you were on board with that?
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (June 25, 2009 10:10 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Yes, the biggest problem Native Americans had in 1492 was a poor immigration policy.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by seahawks123 (June 25, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
              1  
              AA was talking about legal and illegal immigration. After all, legal immigrants take somebody's job as well.

              We are all anchor babies of one sort or another.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (June 25, 2009 10:06 pm ET)
              1  
              I cant believe how often you allude to the intelligence of another poster when you are stupider than the contents of a septic tank
              Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (June 25, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
             
          More information
          The barn has burned down, the property reposessed, a stripmall is planned for the property. Go ahead and close the door now.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (June 25, 2009 9:16 pm ET)
        2
      MMFA, this is a trivial stupid complaint. Normally you guys are spot on, but occasionally you just get to touchy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (June 26, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
           
        Actually, you're right. But TV needs visuals, and someone climbing a fence is more interesting than someone going through a turnstyle. That said, it provoked quite a firestorm, right?

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.