About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

In same sentence, Hannity cites CBO numbers on health care, while ignoring CBO numbers on cap and trade

June 26, 2009 7:42 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Sean Hannity selectively cited "the impact of the CBO numbers and the CBO scoring" while discussing health care reform, but not CBO's estimate for cap-and-trade legislation.

18 Comments

On the June 24 edition of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity selectively cited "the impact of the [Congressional Budget Office] numbers and the CBO scoring" while discussing health care reform, but not its estimate for cap-and-trade legislation. Hannity stated: "A lot of people haven't paid attention to it, and the impact of the CBO numbers and the CBO scoring, nor are people paying attention to this cap and tax, which could cost us nearly 3 million jobs and literally tax American families about $2,000 each." However, Hannity ignored that CBO estimated in a June 19 analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act that the net impact to households from the bill in 2020 would range between a benefit of $40 per year and a cost of $340 per year, with an average cost of $175 per year -- a figure significantly less than $2,000.

As Media Matters for America has noted, as of June 23, several media figures -- including Hannity -- had yet to report on CBO's analysis, despite advancing conservative claims that cap-and-trade legislation favored by President Obama and congressional Democrats would cost thousands of dollars per household.

According to CBO, "That net impact would reflect both the added costs that households experienced because of higher prices and the share of the allowance value that they received in the form of benefit payments, rebates, tax decreases or credits, wages, and returns on their investments." From the analysis:

From the June 24 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: Let me ask you one broad question on the economy before we have to let you go, because you've been writing extensively in The Wall Street Journal about nationalizing health care. He --

KARL ROVE (Fox News political contributor): Right.

HANNITY: He has an infomercial -- and we'll talk about this in more detail later in the program tonight -- but he's got that coming. A lot of people haven't paid attention to it, and the impact of the CBO numbers and the CBO scoring, nor are people paying attention to this cap and tax, which could cost us nearly 3 million jobs and literally tax American families about $2,000 each.

Do you think the American people are aware of the consequences of those two pieces of legislation?

ROVE: Well, I don't think they're fully cognizant yet, but they are paying more attention to it and looking at the details. And as a result -- I write about this tomorrow morning in my piece in The Wall Street Journal -- there's a growing gap between the president's popularity, which is declining, and support for his programs.

The opposition is growing faster to his programs. He is declining in his popularity, but at the opposition to his programs is growing even more dramatically. And what that says to me is that he's in deep trouble on things like the cap and tax and like health care -- $1.6 trillion price tag when he himself admits we're out of money, and we're drowning in a river of red ink, is a real problem for him. And I think we're likely to see his numbers get worse, not better, because of it.

HANNITY: All right, Karl, thanks for being with us. Appreciate it.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (June 26, 2009 7:57 am ET)
      4 2
      What, am I supposed to be surprised that the Mannity manipulates numbers for his own purposes? After all he was talking with Rove, the king of liars and manipulators.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (June 26, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
        3 2
        I'm surprised that he was ABLE to manipulate the numbers. I wonder who told him what to say? Levin? Rove, before they were on air?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 26, 2009 8:10 am ET)
      3 2
      If memory serves me correctly, didn't Sean Hannity win an award for lying? But, on the other hand, doesn't he look intelligent the way he holds his pen? Golly, it makes him look like a college graduate or something. I'd surely believe anything this man said. ;>)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sdlnkicker4551 (June 26, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
      4 2
      Hannity and Rove! What a joke. Since when have they been right about anything. Thank the stars that they continue to destroy the republican party with their warped view of the world.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by USPatriot1776 (June 26, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
        2
      Only an empty headed progressive would make the above comments. I guess the old adage is true... if you can't win a debate with facts, you attack the person you are debating in an attempt to create an air of doubt about their message. Sean Hannity has integrity. It amazes me as to how slimeballs, who have no integrity and no honor, try to cast aspersions on Hannity's character.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (June 26, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
        2 1
        Only a conservative MORON would say Hannity had integrity. Unless by integrity you mean a propensity for lying and making the stupidest statements ever heard outside of third grade
        Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (June 26, 2009 7:13 pm ET)
        3 1
        The article, of course, contained facts and no personal attacks.

        If the article read "weigijl igejesalek gjsilriiske Hannity girdjgr skieslie sgils", apparently you would still have posted what you posted.

        Nowadays whenever I hear "patriot" I think "idiot". I can't help it. There's too many of you poisoning the word.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jjbounce (June 26, 2009 7:34 pm ET)
           
        Either you are just another blind lemming following the leaders continuing to ignore fact, or you are a clever commentator with a flair for the sarcastic. America is a free country and we are free to say what we choose. As long as the right continues to let people like Hannity, Rove, Limbaugh, Beck, and Coulter try to convince each other of the falsehoods they spew over the airwaves, the Republican party is in for a long long hiatus in American politics. I'm just happy that they all congregate on their own little network called Fix Noise...I mean Fox News... actually I was right the first time. The only ones listening to them are the small minority that follow them all. It's good to have them all in one place. They are so annoying.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (June 27, 2009 11:00 pm ET)
        1  
        During the primaries, when Hillary looked to be the winner, Hannity said, on the air, that it was his job to "demonize" her. He did so with relish, until Obama prevailed. Since then he's been demonizing Obama. He works for Roger Ailes, facryinoutloud, handmaiden of Lee Atwater and devotee of the politics of personal destruction. When you live by the ad hominem you'd better be prepared to take a few shots yourself.

        By the way, "Patriot," the US didn't exist in 1776. Empty-headed or not, I know that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by egb (June 27, 2009 4:05 am ET)
      1 1
      CBO WAG on a climate WAG predicting death and destruction.
      What a waste of time.

      CBO always produces numbers that are beneficial to its
      owners. Does that surprise anyone? Who are the owners today?
      Democrats.

      This climate junk science would be hilarious if Congressmen
      weren't voting to spend trillions of tax payer dollars on the
      phony science.

      The next administration will repeal every single line of the 2,200 page bill, HR2454, should it pass. I only hope our economy has not gone into a deep depression before the next election.

      For a real hoot, ask any one of the congressmen voting for this bill how they know CO2 causes global warming and listen to the answer. Ask him which climate model he prefers and why.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jwmckenna (June 27, 2009 6:28 am ET)
           
        Egb

        That's an interesting question. Which climate model do you prefer and why?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (June 27, 2009 6:30 am ET)
        2 1
        Why are you guys so proud of being brainwashed beyond all belief? The science is in. You can refuse to believe in gravity if you want to. I just dont care. You only make yourself look foolish and embarass yourself. You clearly dont know what you are talking about and I dont have the inclination to educate you. Just put on the big shoes and red nose since your apparant motive is to be laughed at.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by hm1342 (June 27, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
          1 1
          Why are you guys so proud of being brainwashed beyond all belief? The science is in.

          Many of us who disagree are not "brainwashed". I am not sure that catastrophe is imminent or even within my lifetime. Numbers can and will be interpreted (just like CBO estimates) in many different ways. As for "the science is in", please provide some specifics. You will not find one side or the other overwhelmingly convincing, even to the numerous scientists involved. I have heard many views of the argument about global warming and man's contribution to it ad nauseum, and the only conclusion I have been able to reach is that no one individual or group really knows enough. There are certainly political agendas involved in the bill; 1,200 pages of legislation cannot be wholly based entirely on scientific research.

          This does not detract from the fact that Hannity, as with most commentators, will only use information that will support his own opinion. Hypocrisy is rampant throughout the media and politics no matter your ideology.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (June 27, 2009 10:38 pm ET)
            1  
            What kind of specifics do you NEED? It is silly to pretend that there is not a scientific consensus on this. The VAST majority of the peer reviewed science, you know, how science is DONE, supports the global climate change. There are HUNDREDS of such articles. Can you cough up even a DOZEN peer reviewed articles that oppose it? No you cant becase a dozen peer reviewed articles dont exist. You have been somewhat reasonable but the guy I was answering is just pulling baseless assertions for which evidence does not and COULD not exist directly from his rectal database and expecting us to take them seriously. He doesnt KNOW the CBO is wrong he doesnt KNOW it will be repealed he CAN NOT KNOW THE FUTURE and is just assuming facts NOT in evidence. THAT is being brainwashed. He claims a study talking about death and destruction was a waste of time. The Pentagon put out a similar report though it was for internal use. He is doing nothing but regurgitating party line talking points. Now THAT is a waste of time. I am not a scientist. I will go with the scientific consensus. Pretending there isnt one is willful blindness.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bluedback (June 27, 2009 10:41 pm ET)
           
        bill ayres,,,,,rev. wright,,,,,literally,,,,,socialism,,,,annointed one,,,,literally,,,,,

        there now you don't have to waste your time watching his show-it's been the same for a year
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (June 27, 2009 11:19 pm ET)
        1  
        The next administration will repeal every single line of the 2,200 page bill, HR2454, should it pass

        I guess you're looking for another Shrub-like little dictator. The Eexecutive, according to the Constitution, doesn't have the power to "repeal" a law passed by Congress. On the contrary, he or she is required to "see that the laws be faithfully executed."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by puttforever4682 (June 27, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
      1  
      "There is no gravity, the Earth sucks"



      Wambaugh--The Glitter Dome
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dawn (June 29, 2009 1:11 am ET)
         
      Karl Rove is really evil.....
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.