About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hour 1: Limbaugh On Cap And Trade: "This Is So Unnecessary. There Isn't Any Global Warming"

June 26, 2009 1:36 pm ET

10 Comments

This hour of the Limbaugh Wire brought to you by frogs' legs (and global warming)
By Simon Maloy

Well, another "Open Line Friday!" is upon us, which means that maybe -- just maybe -- today's program will be a shift away from the past two days, which have been little more than three-hour harangues about the evils of national health care and the alleged perfidy of President Obama, who is now trying to kill the "spirit" of the American people and who, apparently, forced Gov. Mark Sanford to *ahem* "Hike the Appalachian Trail." Of course, that hope is predicated on the fact that "Open Line Friday!" remains true to its promise of unpredictable wackiness, and that promise has rarely, if ever, been realized. On the other hand, the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill is coming up for a vote in the House today, which could give Rush a whole new set of lies to shout at us, so hope springs eternal...

Well, turns out our hopes were well-founded, because Rush got the show rolling with a full-throated denunciation of cap and trade, saying: "This is so unnecessary. There isn't any global warming. This bill is not about climate change; it's not about improving the environment; it's not about anything but raising taxes and taking away people's freedom. It -- folks, we are made of carbon, and what this is, is a carbon tax. Anything -- we are -- theoretically, we could be taxed because of the carbon dioxide we exhale." This legislation, according to Rush, says that we, by virtue of our existence, are destructive polluters who need to be punished. Rush noted that there are Republicans who are "on the fence" over the bill, saying that nobody should be on the fence. This is a situation, said Rush, where the GOP should just say no -- no debate, no nothing. Sunspot activity is down, said Rush, there is no global warming, and this legislation is not going to lower temperatures.

Then Rush said that the Competitive Enterprise Institute released internal EPA emails that, according to the institute, "indicate that a significant internal critique of EPA's position on Endangerment was essentially put under wraps and concealed." This is all about raising taxes and destroying the economy, said Rush, explaining that "we can't imagine that we have elected somebody who really doesn't like the United States as it was founded. We just can't. But that's what's happened. This is exactly what we've done here." Rush then noted that he read an article in the American Thinker by a Nigerian woman calling Obama an "African Colonial." Rush said he read this piece, put it together with what Obama's trying to do with health care and the climate, and decided that it was quite valid.

Then Rush read extensively from Kimberley Strassel's Wall Street Journal op-ed this morning, in which she alleged that the "consensus" on climate change is "collapsing." Rush said this is not being reported widely in the United States, but it's happening in Australia, Japan, and Europe. It's not being reported here, said Rush, because our stars are Al Gore and the UN, and all critics have to be slapped down by the media. As alleged proof of how climate change science is bunk, Rush read from a BBC article on how "[s]cientists think they have resolved one of the most controversial environmental issues of the past decade: the curious case of the missing frogs' legs." Rush read: "Around the world, frogs are found with missing or misshaped limbs, a striking deformity that many researchers believe is caused by chemical pollution and global warming [sic]." If you're wondering why we sic-ed that italicized phrase, it's because it doesn't appear in the actual article. Rush inserted it in there to support his claim that climate change science has been debunked, even though the evidence he cited has nothing to do with climate change.

After the break, Rush noted that the test vote on the cap-and-trade bill the Democrats won this morning is designed to make you think the cap-and-trade debate is over. That's not true, said Rush, this thing is up for grabs. Rush had two lists of Republicans and Democrats who are on the fence, reiterating that there ought to be no Republicans on the fence. This has nothing to do with global warming or saving the planet, Rush said. The problems that this legislation claims to address do not exist, and we can debate the merits of the bill all day long, but the fact is that this is a no-brainer: It is unnecessary. It's a pure power and money grab, said Rush. He then read the names of the on-the-fence Republicans.

After the break, Rush read more from the CEI's analysis of the EPA internal emails, saying that the point of all this is that the consensus we've heard about all these years is falling apart. The science is irrelevant to the EPA, said Rush, and they don't want to analyze it. They're accepting a political conclusion, he said, and this has nothing to do with science. The political goal here, Rush claimed, is weakening the economy to create more power for Obama and his minions. Then Rush once again read the names of the on-the-fence crowd on Capitol Hill.

Before and after the break, Rush read extensively from the American Thinker piece alleging that Obama is an "African Colonial," interspersing throughout his own concurring thoughts on how Obama is engineering a Marxist power grab. Needless to say, the piece is a shoddy smear of Obama and his father, replete with broad, unsupported attacks on the president, such as: "Obama has been living on American soil for most of his adult life. Therefore, he has been able to masquerade as one who understands and believes in American democratic ideals. But he does not." Nonetheless, Rush said that the author had "really pegged Obama." This, ladies and gentlemen, is a fine example of how the echo chamber works -- a sloppily written smear of the president on a fringe conservative website that would normally have drawn little to no attention is instantly amplified by Rush Limbaugh's sizeable megaphone. After reading the piece, Rush concluded that "we've elected somebody who's more African in his roots than he is American."

Greg Lewis and Lauryn Bruck contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh Wire.

Highlights from Hour 1

Outrageous comments

LIMBAUGH: This is so unnecessary. There isn't any global warming. This bill is not about climate change; it's not about improving the environment; it's not about anything but raising taxes and taking away people's freedom. It -- folks, we are made of carbon, and what this is, is a carbon tax.

Anything -- we are -- theoretically, we could be taxed because of the carbon dioxide we exhale. If they want to figure out how much that is contributing to global warming, we can be taxed on that basis. There's no limit here once you start taxing carbon. We are made of carbon. We are a carbon-based life form.

What this legislation seeks to establish is that we, by virtue of our existence, are destructive polluters who have to be punished. We are polluters whether we want to be or not. It's just -- because we're carbon. It's just -- it is absurd.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: Folks, I know it's hard to understand that we've elected somebody who is willingly, purposely setting out to deplete the capital in the private sector, to destroy the U.S. economy. I know it's hard to understand. Most of you don't have -- most of us, I'll put myself in this -- most of us do not have this concept of that kind of power of wanting it, wanting to use it for our own personal fun, frolic, frivolity, whatever.

We don't -- we can't imagine that we have elected somebody who really doesn't like the United States as it was founded. We just can't. But that's what's happened. This is exactly what we've done here.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: I share all this with you because it is -- she's nailed who the guy is. Americans look at Obama and they say, "Oh, the first black president," and they go, "Oh, we're shedding some of our guilt here. Look how enlightened we are, what a great country we are," when, in fact, we've elected somebody who's more African in his roots than he is American, loves his father, who was a Marxist, and is behaving like an African colonial despot.

And you can see it in his health care legislation, the stimulus bill, taking over automobile companies, the czars that he has that are not accountable to anybody but him, and now the climate bill. All of this is about nothing other than the acquisition of power and the ability to further regulate your privacy and behavior.

America's Truth Rejector

Inserted the words "global warming" into an article that had nothing to do with global warming:

LIMBAUGH: There's one other thing in here, though -- oh, the frogs. Remember all the horror stories that we have seen over the years about deformed frogs at birth, and we have been told this is due to global warming and their ecology all out of whack? We find out that that's not the case, and the BBC -- the left-wing BBC -- is none the less the source.

"Scientists think they have resolved one of the most controversial environmental issues of the past decade: the curious case of missing frogs' legs. Around the world, frogs are found with missing or misshaped limbs, a striking deformity that many researchers believe is caused by chemical pollution" and global warming. "However, tests on frogs and toads have revealed a more natural, benign cause. The deformed frogs are actually victims of the predatory habits of dragonfly nymphs, which eat the legs of tadpoles.

"In the late 1980s and early 1990s, researchers started getting reports of numerous wild frogs or toads being found with extra legs or arms, or with limbs that were partly formed or missing completely. The cause of the deformities became a hotly contested issue."

Had to be caused by global warming and this and that and that. People said that, "No, no, no. This is happening naturally," were debunked and called deniers, and so forth, but they have now proven that these deformed frogs are simply nature taking its course -- nothing to do with man; nothing to do with us, all right? And now the cap-and-trade bill will probably tax dragonflies once they learn about this.

Echo chamber

Read almost in its entirety a sloppy hit piece on Obama from the American Thinker, titled "Obama, the African Colonial."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (June 26, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
      3 1
      Oh, good. He's going into Professor Limbaugh mode again. Very reassuring to know that there are a couple million Americans getting their science education from Boss Hogg.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cstrasburger (June 27, 2009 10:51 am ET)
           
        IF, you are really a colonel, I would have exepected better from you...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sdlnkicker4551 (June 26, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
      2 1
      The real sad part of Limbaugh is that he has an audience that does listen and believe him. Oh by the way. Obama is to blame for Micheal Jackson demise and everything else you can think of.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (June 26, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
      3 1
      If some frogs are missing legs because dragonflies eat them, what's the explanation for frogs with extra legs? Are dragonflies adding legs to some tadpoles as they eat the legs of others?

      Do you think any of Limbaugh's dimbulb listeners even asked themselves this?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (June 26, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
        3 1
        Maybe they're socialist dragonflies engaging in limb redistribution.

        Or is that just slightly beyond what the average dittohead would believe?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Big Al (June 29, 2009 8:50 am ET)
           
        I asked myself this. It turns out that a parasite is able to hijack the frogs' development completely enough to cause the multiple limbs mutation . This same parasite's earlier life stage requires that it gestate inside a wading bird. Polydactyly, or its attachment equivalent, makes the frogs less mobile in the environment, hence more able to be eaten by the wading birds. This is my seven-year-old daughter's favorite example of "Animal Transformations", which was the number one transformation on a n Animal Planet episode of "The Most Extreme". Mother Nature is a sportin' chick, no?

        Incidentally, Pew Research polls consistently show that Limbaugh's audience to be number one or two (The Atlantic Monthly is one or tied with Limbaugh). Emotionalism and name-calling aren't argumentation - it is the infantile defeat of reason, diseducation if you will.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (June 26, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
      2 1
      I'm not sure Dittoheads are carbon based.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 28, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
           
        To the extent that crap is carbon, yes, they are.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cstrasburger (June 27, 2009 10:12 am ET)
         
      As is, unfortunatly, all to typical, the writers on this site, twist and spin the commentary into something it wasn't, nor show any factual baseline whatsoever.

      You know what is really sad? That you children are continuing to buy into the rhetoric, ignorance, and now substantially disputed myths of global warming, or climate change, or whatever the term du jour. What is so sad, is that not one person here on this site, the writers, commenters or anyone else can state a specific fact as related to human beings impact on mother earth. Being a highly educated engineer and scientist, I can tell you unequivocally, you are buying into lies and deciept. Do you really think that "climatologists" who cannot predict the weather 10 days from now, much less one hundred years from now can provide substantive data? The ONLY way to get good data with which to work, are from geologists...info based on hundreds of thousands of years of historical fact. They can predict considerably bettter, because they have substantive historical data with which to work... Now I know that some of you are going to say that "so do climatologists", but you forget (or never knew) that climate data was only begun to be recorded since the mid-1800's....and we have been through three upturns and downturns in temperature since then. It is also a fact that that data collecterd from weather records is vastly incomplete. To wit, nothing substantial on which to base opinions.

      Someone made the comment that only a couple million Americans listen to Rush...here is a fact for you...his base audience is considerably higher...over 20 million.....and listening to the liberal machine trying to denegrate Rush is quite comical, actually. Another fact, Rush is correct most of the time, which is why this president and these outlets are so afraid of him. And they are, no matter what they tell you. I mean, if Rush were so insignificant, why do they spend so much time beating him and others like him, up? Chew on that for a few minutes...and if you even have half a brain, you will begin to ask why as well...

      Rather than listening to organizations or people that take great pleasure in trying to make someone look bad (typical of liberals because they cannot do it with qualified argument), you might want to listen to Rush yourselves to allow yourselves to look at both sides, so you can make informed decisions....something I learned in school, get all the data, NOT just one side of the equation so that you don't fall into the lemming category. In fact, your listening to one side of the equation and just accepting that as fact, especially its not, does nothing but make you look ignorant. Another point you might want to consider is that liberals count on your ignorance to get their petty agendas around you...here's a fact, liberals don't just think you're stupid, they know you are...

      I would venture to guess, and I'd bet correctly, that none of you have any idea what is in this ridiculous bill. And you will not get the information you need to make an informed decision here, or on the poopulist news stations, or other outlets like media matters. Yes, media does matter, but this one is one that doesn't because they are not honest.

      I could post virtually thousands of references to these issues to support the FACTS that global warming, climate change and its "voodoo science" is not in any way in, complete, or otherwise factual. But, unfortunately I do not have the time nor interest in educating lemmings that appear to prefer being led around by their noses as opposed to trying to get to the truth. This, again unfortunately, is the modus operandi of liberals...taking the easy way out... If this bill actually passes, as did that abomination of a stimulus bill, it will be a sad day in this country...and you are the ones that will pay the highest price for it. Me, I have built and sold three successful software companies, working on the fourth now, and I could retire today if I wanted to...so it will have little impact on me...I have plenty of money (as do my investors and some employees)...but you are the ones it will have substantial negative long term impact on.

      Keep drinking the kool-aid people, and when you wake up, hopefully it won't be too late for you...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cstrasburger (June 27, 2009 10:30 am ET)
         
      I hope that media matters, though not yours, has the guts and the intergrity to post my previous comments...but I suspect not...too bad for your lemmings....
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.