About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNS, Fox Business silent on controversial views of medical group

June 26, 2009 7:25 pm ET

SUMMARY: CNSNews.com and Fox Business Network each gave a platform to representatives of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, but did not note that it is a conservative-leaning group that has promoted and endorsed controversial views on medicine and health.

11 Comments

In a June 26 article, CNSNews.com senior reporter/editor Pete Winn reported on the claims of "Dr. David McKalip of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons," a Florida neurosurgeon who claimed in a "unique virtual town meeting broadcast on the Internet" that including a public plan option in health care reform -- which Winn described as "a mandatory government insurance option" -- will result in "government takeover of medicine" with a goal to "ration care" that will cause doctors to "simply start migrating out of medicine." But Winn did not note that AAPS is a conservative-leaning group that has promoted and endorsed controversial views on medicine and health, including urging doctors not to serve as Medicare providers and supporting a "moratorium on vaccine mandates."

Similarly, in a June 11 interview of AAPS director of policy and public affairs Kathryn Serkes, Fox Business Network host Stuart Varney did not identify AAPS' ideological leanings or note its views.

Among the views AAPS or its leaders are on record as promoting or endorsing:

  • It has urged doctors to withdraw from serving as Medicare providers. An August 2000 press release -- headlined "DOCS SHOULD QUIT MEDICARE, SAYS LEADING DOCTORS' GROUP" -- quoted AAPS executive director Jane M. Orient as saying: "Medicare sentences seniors to lousy care, delayed care or even death. ... Doctors should refuse to be willing participants in this game of regulatory Russian roulette."
  • AAPS members passed a resolution in 2000 calling for a "moratorium on vaccine mandates." In a press release, Orient stated regarding parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated: "It's obscene to threaten to seize a child just because his parents refuse medical treatment that is obviously unnecessary and perhaps even dangerous."
  • Orient has defended William Hurwitz, a Virginia doctor, following his conviction on 50 counts related to illegal drug distribution. Hurwitz was accused of prescribing massive amounts of painkillers to patients who would then reportedly abuse the pills or distribute them to others, which prosecutors claimed resulted in one death. In a January 2005 Newsmax.com column, Orient criticized "overzealous, ambitious prosecutors [who] portray themselves as crusaders against the supposed scourge of medically caused addiction," later writing: "Hurwitz was accused of being responsible for an epidemic of drug abuse in Virginia and many other states. Now that he's been shackled and carted off to prison, possibly for life, prosecutors may be popping champagne corks and preparing new indictments. The effect on the illegal prescription-drug traffic in Virginia because he has been convicted will be precisely zilch." 
  • AAPS filed an amicus brief pressing for the public release of photos of former Clinton deputy counsel Vincent Foster -- whom the AAPS described as "the attorney assigned by Hillary Clinton to 'fix' the AAPS lawsuit against the Health Care Task Force" -- taken following his 1993 death, which numerous investigations have determined a suicide. In a newsletter describing the brief, AAPS wrote:

To this day, the government has refused to release for independent scrutiny ten photographs of Foster's fully clothed body taken in Fort Marcy Park. One of the photographs, which showed a gun in the hand of the post-mortem body, was leaked and widely published in degraded form. But it raised more questions than it answered, such as how the .38 caliber gun of an alleged suicide remained in his hand and even appeared to be lodged underneath his leg.

Briefs are being filed before the Supreme Court on the issue of whether the government can continue to conceal the photographs, which might show multiple bullet wounds or a pattern of blood flow inconsistent with the posture of the discovered body. The precedent at stake is whether the government can hide behind the privacy exception to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), "exemption 7(C)."

  • In 2001, the AAPS' Medical Sentinel published a review by Orient of Christopher Ruddy's book The Strange Death of Vincent Foster. The review stated, in a reference to the Shakespearian play Macbeth:

Macbeth ordered the murder of his old friend, but the appearance of Banquo's ghost at a banquet spelled his own doom.

Does life imitate art? Vincent Foster, like Banquo, surely carried many secrets with him to the grave.

If we ever find out what happened on the day of his death --- and the night after --- we may have a key to many other matters. With new material now coming to light, this book is as timely as the day it was first published.

  • A May 2005 AAPS newsletter asserted that the case of Terri Schiavo "took on the trappings of the 'final decision' in the Roman Colosseum in the days of the gladiators," adding:

When one of the gladiators was disarmed, he knelt in front of the victor, who looked to the crowd and the royal elite for their decision: thumbs up or thumbs down. The American public, according to television polls that described her condition inaccurately, was 80% in favor of killing Terri. The judicial elite, playing to the fervor of the crowd, showed thumbs down.

  • In a June 25 "open letter to America's physicians" on the AAPS website, McKalip stated: "Congress and President Obama are proposing to turn doctors into servants of the state, insurance companies, hospitals, and everyone except who matters most: the patient. We will be turned into bean counters, computer entry clerks, dutiful 'providers' and will not resemble anything like a 'professional.' "

Additionally, in 2005, the AAPS' Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons published an article by Madeleine Pelner Cosman, who was not a medical doctor, that claimed leprosy "was so rare in America that in 40 years only 900 people were afflicted. Suddenly, in the past three years America has more than 7,000 cases of leprosy. Leprosy now is endemic to northeastern states because illegal aliens and other immigrants brought leprosy from India, Brazil, the Caribbean, and Mexico." In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted, the National Hansen's Disease Program of the Department of Health and Human Services reported that there had been just 431 reported cases of Hansen's disease, or leprosy, over the "past three years" and a total of 8,490 cases from 1966 to 2005. Cosman's false claim was repeated on CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight and by right-wing website WorldNetDaily.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by John Paradox (June 26, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
         
      Hmmm... they{AAPS)'re located in Tucson. Might swing by and take a look at their 'woo'.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Old Timer (June 27, 2009 1:38 am ET)
      1  
      It's scarey to think that apparently well educated people think in such a bizarre fashion. Any one of us could be seeing a physician who shares these beliefs and we would have no idea hat was the case. Some aspects of this are potentially dangerous to patients. It reminds me of former Senator Bill Frist (he is an MD)deciding that Terry Schiavo should be kept alive because, based on some videotape he saw of her, he was convinced that her brain was fine and if she were kept alive long enough she would come out of her coma and get her life back. After her death, the autopsy confirmed what most doctors in the field (neurology) already knew - her brain had deteriorated significantly and could never again function normally.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tjmccool2284 (June 27, 2009 4:35 am ET)
      2  
      thumbs up or thumbs down.

      Criminy, they even got that wrong. The Romans didn't use the Gladiator thumbs up. According to Ridley Scott, he knew the legend was false but put it in the movie because most people thought it was true.The Latin is ambiguous.

      These guys aren't ambiguous about the Schiavo matter, they're just flat wrong. The polls showed people wanted Congress to stay out of the matter and,, because so many people face these decisions themselves, felt that it was a family matter. Michael was her husband amd he shoulld have made the call after all the time he spent trying to help her.
      Most of the people MMFA spends time criticizing made fools of themselves in the Schiavo matter, Hannity, Scarborough, the most egregious, but the consequences of their lying? More face time, higher ratings, more money.
      What a country!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (June 27, 2009 9:55 am ET)
        2  
        Higher ratings for going against the public?

        As people are realizing how corrupt, stupid, and trivial the media is, they're leaving. But it's the liberals who are leaving first. Therefore Fox News will have the best ratings during the entire period, therefore the rest of the media will continue to think that emulating Fox News is the way to get ratings, even as the republican party dwindles to 10% of the population.

        The media's complete destruction is inevitable. Then we can give democracy another try.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by clsr (June 28, 2009 10:52 am ET)
             
          the media is too small a part of the puzzle to have it collapse and get democracy to work again! Are you nuts? who controls the friggin media...the government and industry! that's who needs to fall to take back our country...from social engineering scum like Bush and Obama!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by twseattle (June 29, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
           
        The funniest thing to me is that, if the romans did use the thumb sign, the thumb up meant 'go ahead and kill him', thumb down was 'don't kill him'. So they got their false analogy backward, probably why conservatives find it so easy to believe.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (June 29, 2009 2:44 pm ET)
          1  
          i mean to correct you in the most respectible way possible, thumbs up was not used. the kill sign was your thumb pointed at your throat: meaning bury your sword in their throat. the thumbs down was the "let him live" sign, and it meant to bury the sword in the ground. allowing the gladiator to live. rarely was the kill sign given, because gladiators were professionals and were treated as such.

          hell the roman army didn't get the kind of care an experienced gladiator did. and the roman army was very well known to take care of its soldiers.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (June 29, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
        1  
        i can attest to the games of the Flavian Ampatheater.

        the actual usage was thumbs down if the crowd had felt the loser had fought honorably and should be allowed to live.

        if you pointed your thumb towards your throat, that means the crowed felt the loser was dishonerable and should be put to death.

        truth of the matter was, that most gladiators were rarely given the death sentence, because it took time and money to train men to fight in specific fashions.

        very much like moder sports stars that get paid lots of money, they are protected and given the best of everything to keep them in top shape so that their trainers can keep putting them in the games and make money. its not much different then as it was today, gladiators regularly made product endorsements, public appearences and what would today be considered billboard advertising. these guys were investments to their owners and so had to make lots of money, and about 75 percent lived to retire, free men, some (if they had done somethign to seriously impress an emperor) were even given citizenship.

        those that were killed in the arena most often were criminals or christians, that were sentenced to die anyway, and instead of using trained killers, who felt that fighting such men were beneath them, lions would be unleashed to do the deed instead.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (June 29, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
          1  
          allow me to clarify a bit, i can attest to roman history given that my specialty in history was Roman history and military history
          Report Abuse
    • Author by clsr (June 28, 2009 10:50 am ET)
        1
      you media matters types are worse than the conservatives that you hate so much.I'm neither con or lib because you both make me sick for different reasons. One thing I am supportive of, is tha AAPS and their stance on vaccinations. You social engineer elitist scum can laugh all you want, but the AAPS has looked at the science and had the balls to tell the truth.
      And you use their stance on vaccinations as an example of how crazy they are? Go ahead and line up for that crap all you want...you're obviously the ones that could use a reality check!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (June 29, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
           
        and what are wrong with vaccinations.........it helps prevent disease does it not?

        ive had all mine done and never got measles, or rubella. i did contract mumps so 2 out of three ain't bad, as meatloaf would say.

        never had diphtheria or tetanus either, nor polio.........so....again i ask whats wrong with vaccines.....

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.