About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity again crops Obama's comments abroad in order to smear him

July 08, 2009 10:30 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Sean Hannity deceptively cropped President Obama's answer to a question about the Cold War to suggest that Obama did not acknowledge the actions of past U.S. presidents in freeing Eastern Europe.

192 Comments

On the July 7 edition of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity deceptively cropped President Obama's answer to a question from Fox News senior White House correspondent Major Garrett about the Cold War to suggest that Obama did not acknowledge the actions of past U.S. presidents in freeing Eastern Europe. In fact, as part of his answer, Obama stated, "I'm very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain," a comment Hannity edited out of the clip he aired of Obama's response.

Hannity aired the following clip:

GARRETT: In your speech this morning, you said the Cold War reached its conclusion because of the actions of many nations over many years.

Mr. President, are the Russian sensitivities so fragile that you can't say the Cold War was won, the West won it, and it was led by a combination of Democratic and Republican American presidents?

OBAMA: There were a whole bunch of people throughout Eastern Europe who showed enormous courage, and I think that it is very important in this part of the world to acknowledge the degree to which people struggled for their own freedom.

We don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.

From Fox News' transcript of Obama's July 7 interview with Garrett, with the portions of Obama's answer Hannity omitted in bold:

GARRETT: In your speech this morning, you said the Cold War reached its conclusion because of the actions of many nations over many years. Mr. President, are the Russian sensitivities so fragile that you can't say the Cold War was won? The West won it? And it was led by a combination of Democratic and Republican American presidents?

OBAMA: Well, listen, the -- I think that you just cut out Lech Walesa and the Poles. You just cut out Havel and the Czechs. There were a whole bunch of people throughout Eastern Europe who showed enormous courage.

And I think that it is very important in this part of the world to acknowledge the degree to which people struggled for their own freedom. I'm very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain.

But, you know, we don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.

After airing the cropped clip, Hannity said:

HANNITY: Unbelievable. Now, that's interesting, because Lech Walesa, the leader of the Polish Solidarity Movement, said this about the end of the Cold War; he said, quote: "We in Poland took him, Ronald Reagan, so personally. Why? Because we owe him our liberty. Now this can't be said often enough by people who lived under oppression for half a century."

Mr. President, if I were you, you may want to consider hitting the history books maybe before your next foreign trip.

Media Matters for America has documented a pattern by Hannity and other Fox News personalities of cropping Obama's comments abroad to misrepresent their meaning.

From the July 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: And tonight in "Hannity's America": The president is in Russia, and, this morning, he sat down for an interview with our own Major Garrett. Now you won't believe his answer to Major's very first question.

[begin video clip]

GARRETT: In your speech this morning, you said the Cold War reached its conclusion because of the actions of many nations over many years.

Mr. President, are the Russian sensitivities so fragile that you can't say the Cold War was won, the West won it, and it was led by a combination of Democratic and Republican American presidents?

OBAMA: There were a whole bunch of people throughout Eastern Europe who showed enormous courage, and I think that it is very important in this part of the world to acknowledge the degree to which people struggled for their own freedom.

We don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.

[end video clip]

HANNITY: Unbelievable. Now, that's interesting, because Lech Walesa, the leader of the Polish Solidarity Movement, said this about the end of the Cold War; he said, quote: "We in Poland took him, Ronald Reagan, so personally. Why? Because we owe him our liberty. Now this can't be said often enough by people who lived under oppression for half a century."

Mr. President, if I were you, you may want to consider hitting the history books maybe before your next foreign trip.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mr. l (July 08, 2009 10:38 am ET)
      13 1
      Hannity and cropping- just need a little splicing and mixing in there like he always does, aaaand, *POOF*, Hannity's new name shall be 'Crappity'
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (July 08, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
        15 1
        Hannity is so dishonest...

        I hate to say it, but the man is pure filth. Pure hate. He's a great danger to democracy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by smarshall1432997 (July 08, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
          3  
          Don't forget Bill O. too.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by doubleaseven (July 08, 2009 11:56 pm ET)
               
            Bill O is not so blatant. Once in a rare while he does argue for the Prez.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by doubleaseven (July 09, 2009 12:01 am ET)
          1  
          The man is totally conceited - he thinks he is erudite and funny. He does not realize that good satire is never based on a lie.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (July 09, 2009 12:53 am ET)
        2  
        I would not exactly put it that way but alas, Hannity has no moral rudder. His conscience is so seared that he seems relaxed when he tells a big fat whopper. But alas, none of us expect him to be truthful so we just get a big giggle from his big fat lies.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rdirkse (July 09, 2009 6:14 am ET)
        1  
        And people actually listen and believe this creep
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 10:39 am ET)
      20 1
      OK, Hannity's willful deception and his constant, purposeful distortions of what President Obama says prompt the following question - a direct and full Sean Hannity quote - that he himself should answer:

      Is it that you hate this president or that you hate America?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (July 08, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
        17 5
        #3, he hates black presidents.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (July 08, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
          6  
          Snoop

          Black American Presidents.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by zamfir273114 (July 09, 2009 7:53 am ET)
            6
          Half white half black. I don't think anybody thinks about Obama's "halfness" besides a few libs.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Handsome Pete (July 09, 2009 9:59 am ET)
            6  
            Except for Rush Limbaugh, and the other conservative talking heads who have referred to him as a "halfrican" American.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (July 08, 2009 7:20 pm ET)
        1  
        Answer: We, (Hannity, Bill O., FoxNews Channel, Conservatives, Neo-Conservatives and Republicans), passionately HATE President Obama, ALL Democrats, and Minorities.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 9:30 pm ET)
          2  
          The only thing they stand for is standing against Obama.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 9:30 pm ET)
          2  
          The only thing they stand for is standing against Obama.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by doubleaseven (July 08, 2009 11:59 pm ET)
        1  
        Is the answer not obvious; it will be lie.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj2970 (July 09, 2009 12:59 am ET)
        3  
        Sorry but Hannity could never answer that question honestly. He lies to himself, the very worst sort of lying. He has long ago separated himself from truthfulness when it cones to anyone with whom he disagrees. The guy is to be pittied. Poor thing does not even seem to have developed a Catholic conscience. I have no idea how he takes sacrament with all his hate filled rhetoric. Perhaps he even lies to his priest.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (July 08, 2009 10:43 am ET)
      18 1
      when you deliberately remove words from the middle of a quote, especially one as short as this, then you are putting out propaganda. i'm sure people will defend this with saying that fox got the main points. no, they did not. the fact is that it would have taken no time at all to air the complete quote of what obama said. but then, the faux news pravda propaganda network and hannity would have nothing to attack obama with. this is a total lie, and one that faux is repeatedly guilty of. they cut out sections of a quote and then spend twenty minutes attacking what the speaker supposedly said. how about taking the extra ten seconds to include the entire quote and let the viewer decide what was said. is that too much to ask of the "fair and balanced" network. apparently it is, because they've been caught doing this dozens of times.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (July 08, 2009 10:50 am ET)
        18 1
        and the idea that reagan alone was responsible for ending the cold war is nonsense. the fact is that the soviet system was a political and economic failure and was not going to be able to continue. they actually were their own worst enemies when they allowed a series of aged and ailing leaders to be seen as their face to the world.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by skiploader1111 (July 08, 2009 11:11 am ET)
          18 5
          The Beatles, blue jeans, and Michael Jackson did more to end the Cold War than Reagan did.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by newzhound (July 08, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
            7 2
            skiploader1111: Don't forget sugar water and "I Love Lucy" re-runs...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (July 08, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
              6 1
              And don't forget the resource-depleting war/occupation of Afghanistan.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by achrispage6992 (July 08, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
                3 15
                For all of Reagan's faults why is it so hard for you guys to give him any credit whatsoever for the fall of the Soviet Union. Is it your belief that his policies had no effect whatsover on the eventual end result? Surely you cannot try to deny that the Soviet attempt to keep up with our military spending was at least a part of the victory? You mentioned Afghanistan. Where do you think the guerilla's got their weaponry which helped cause the resource depletion experienced by the Soviets? Come on! It's not a crime to give credit to someone with whom you have completely different political ideologies with.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (July 08, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
                  8 2
                  That was Charlie Wilson and the CIA arming the Afghans, not Reagan. They just made a movie about it.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by achrispage6992 (July 09, 2009 7:59 am ET)
                      4
                    Jeesh! What branch of government oversees the CIA? Reagan deployed CIA special activities in Afghanistan which is exactly the reason Charlie Wilson had someone to help distribute and train Afghans in the use of the weapons. In fact, in the book "Strategic Intelligence: The intelligence cycle : the flow of secret ... By Loch K. Johnson it is pointed out that President Carter approved a major covert operation to send arms to the Afghan resistance forces through the CIA and its contacts in Saudia Arabia and Pakistan.

                    Charlie Wison's war was a good movie sir, but really, do you believe everything you see in the movies? don't fool yourslef into thinking that Congressman Charlie Wilson and a CIA bureau chief secretly sent arms and trained guerilla's without knowledge of the Executive branch.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (July 09, 2009 10:13 am ET)
                      6  
                      Reagan didn't "know" he was exchanging arms for hostages, so I'm not convinced he was involved at all in arming the Afghans.

                      Heck, by the end of his term he didn't even know what he had for breakfast.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (July 08, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
                  11 2
                  I do not see a problem in giving Reagan some of the credit. What I see liberals often do is overcompensate for what they see from conservatives that vastly overstate the credit. As if Reagan commanded "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" and it just happened.

                  Reagan's military build-up is often seen as one of the major reasons for the breakup and I believe it was a catalyst. Other factors include the credit crunch in the third world that shutoff Soviet exports and the collapse of the world commodities market that in the end actually bankrupted the Soviet system.

                  Giving all of the credit to Reagan is an overstatement, but I agree that his military buildup was a major factor.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by blueline99 (July 08, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
                  12  
                  The military spending that Reagan enacted was a reaction to the Soviet spending that increased due to the Afghanistan war. The Soviets did not react at all to the US increased military spending, mostly because they didn't have any more money and their economy was in shambles.

                  Following the USSR’s previous large military buildup, President Reagan ordered an enormous peacetime defense buildup of the United States Military; the Soviets did not respond to this by building up their military because the military expenses, in combination with collectivized agriculture in the nation, and inefficient planned manufacturing, proved a heavy burden for the Soviet economy. It was already stagnant and in a poor state prior to the tenure of Mikhail Gorbachev who, despite significant attempts at reform, was unable to revitalise the economy.
                  Gaidar, Yegor (2007-10-17) (in Russian). Collapse of an Empire: Lessons for Modern Russia. Brookings Institution Press. pp. 190–210. ISBN 5824307598.

                  The covert war that the US supported certainly was part of fall of the Soviets, but the majority of the credit goes to Gorbachev... he's the one who enacted change within the country that ultimately led to the fall of the Communist Party.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
                  7  
                  He gets some credit for following Carters plan in Afghanistan, (which I find morally repugnant) and for the spending but he doesnt deserve the kind of credit the brave people of Czhechoslovakia and Poland deserve. Yeah though he gets some credit
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Slinkie (July 08, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
                  3 1
                  Read the book Tear Down this Myth about the great deciever ronnie really was.And for the wall coming down that was due to communist ideology being followed to the letter. Just as in this country if conservative ideology is not held in check it will destroy our constitution as they already have started the process with the so called patriot act what is patriotic about taking away our rights
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (July 09, 2009 7:30 am ET)
                  4  
                  There have always been two questions for me here. First, did the spending cause the collapse, or did it just accelerate it? Second, does that justify the action? There's no question that it had an effect, the issue for me is whether that effect was worth the price tag or not.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
                3  
                Should have read down farther to see you already made this point
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Blue Dog (July 08, 2009 5:33 pm ET)
            4  
            And don't forget the hated George Soros!

            Horror of horrors! It can't be!! A wild-eyed liberal helped out too? With his own money? Nooooooooooo!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by roadshowrigoletto (July 08, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
          12 2
          I say give the credit to Reagan, but let's also say that Reagan is responsible for the current state of economic affairs in this country.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by smarshall1432997 (July 08, 2009 7:30 pm ET)
            5  
            And too, Republicans forget how former Pres. Reagan "PLACED" taxes on Unemployment Compensation for people who "LOST" their jobs back during his Administration.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (July 08, 2009 12:45 pm ET)
          14 2
          As I've said many times over the years, giving Reagan credit for ending the Cold War is like giving a rooster credit for the sunrise.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
            18 2

            I bought a new T.V. for my bedroom right after 9/11 and since I had that T.V. this country has not been attacked. My T.V. is keeping us safe. You're all welcome.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by pklute63 (July 08, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
              1 1
              Before I thank you...where was the TV made? Is it American?
              Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 08, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
            1 20
            And exactly who in your view deserves the credit? History clearly shows Reagan won the cold war.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
              14 1
              History clearly shows Reagan won the cold war.


              No, history does not clearly show that. Try again.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
                  17
                Read this from your friends at slate
                How Reagan won the Cold War. - By Fred Kaplan - Slate Magazine

                http://www.slate.com/id/2102081/
                Report Abuse
                • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
                  15  
                  Who's friend?

                  Big deal....another opinion piece. *Yawn*

                  I raise you two:

                  http://marc.perkel.com/2004/06/11/reagan-did-not-win-the-cold-war/

                  http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Reagan_won_the_cold_war
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (July 08, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
              10 2
              Reagan just happened to be in office when it happened. It was blind luck and all it took was a good photo op at the Berlin Wall to turn you into a believer of Saint Ronnie.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
                11 2

                Using this line of reich-wing "logic", herr dubyah caused 9/11 because he was the sitting president.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Koyaanisqatsi (July 08, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
                  8 1
                  Shrub ignored 50+ warnings, including the August 6th pdb. "Asleep at the switch" is the kindest thing you could say about the Cheney Administration's incompetency. Looking at the PNAC documents, reasonable questions can be posited as to whether they ignored the warnings on purpose.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                    4 1
                    Of course they did. They needed a catalyst of fear to sell the invasion of Iraq. They may have misjudged the scale of the attack they allowed, but they knew it was coming.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mari2jj2970 (July 09, 2009 1:10 am ET)
                      3  
                      Unfortunatly GW probably had this fetish to outdo his dad, but look how miserable he failed. the mess GW got us into only proved hwo terrible inept GW was. Not a chip off the old block at all.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (July 08, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
                10  
                The Soviet Union collapsed under Bush 41.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by blueline99 (July 08, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
              12 1
              Did President Reagan tell President Gorbachev to enact Glastnost and Perestroika.

              Did Reagan tell the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan?

              How exactly will history clearly show that Reagan won the cold war...

              It's like giving the kicker credit for winning a game by kicking the extra point, instead of the offense for scoring the touchdown.

              Reagan deserves some credit, history will show that he encouraged Saudi Arabia to increase oil production to lower the price of oil to 1/3 of its cost which lowered Soviet export revenue.

              History shows that Glastnost brought some democracy to the Soviets and Perestroika brought economic reforms... these were the two major catalyst of the end of the Cold War. Reagan had nothing to do with that.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
              7 1
              Sure if by history you mean Limborg programming otherwise not so much. I am willing to say he deserves some credit along with a whole lot of other things. Saying HE won the cold war like he went Rambo like with an M-16 and kicked commie butt is simplistic and frankly ludicrous.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by achrispage6992 (July 09, 2009 8:07 am ET)
                  4
                Fair enough and I agree with your comment. But, you may notice that there are some here who seem to actually believe that in the 8 years he was President none of his policies contributed to the downfall of the Soviet Union. That is fallacious and anybody who is not completely blinded by simple minded hatred of anything conservative knows this.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hjhaney (July 09, 2009 4:49 pm ET)
                     
                  Yes. He funded and trained the Afghanistan "Freedom Fighters" also known as Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in terrorist tacticts to be used against the USSR. How's that working out for us? Reagan, the gift that keeps on giving.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by LuvLuLu (July 09, 2009 9:43 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Are you always so full of strawman arguments?
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
              8
            I'll use that line about Obama after the economy turns itself around.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
              8  
              Feel free. No one will buy it. I personally think and have seen other liberals say that the President gets too much blame for a bad economy and too much credit for a good one. However if you are saying the Presidents effect on the economy is the same as it is on the USSR then its a false equivalence
              Report Abuse
        • Author by zl84841g4299 (July 08, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
          7  
          Miklós Németh was as responsible as any actor in 1989 for the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was his decision to allow East Germans to pass through Hungary from Austria to West Germany that precipitated the fall of the wall. I don't think he was following orders from Reagan. So many Americans cite Reagan as the prime agent. How many can find Hungary on the map?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
          5  
          We also shouldnt underestimate the contribution of Carter and Brzenzki who drew them into the Vietnam trap as they put if of invading Afghanistan which was a disaster for them.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (July 08, 2009 5:20 pm ET)
          7  
          achrispage, maybe you need to read what was said. i started out by saying that claiming reagan "alone" was responsible for ending the cold war was nonsense. i did not say he had no part in it. a lot of people had a part in it, from truman on down. but it's a conservative cliche that he "won the cold war". actually, if you get down to it, reagan gave the answer before it collapsed. he said the soviet system would "end up on the scrap heap of history", because it was obviously a poorly functioning system, riddled with corruption, repression, and waste. i had no problem when he said that, because i agreed.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by albertsenj (July 09, 2009 12:22 am ET)
        2  
        Excising bits out of a quote is ok but, NOT if you're going to attack the person you're quoting for what is 'missing'!

        Is it possible that Sean doesn't know that these pieces are missing?

        If not, at what point does it become slanderous? The bar is pretty high for slander with a public figure but, it shouldn't be difficult to prove 'malice' given Hannity's pattern of manipulating quotes and then attacking the President based on the altered quotes.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by benjr (July 09, 2009 10:38 am ET)
          4  
          It's HIS show, so he is responsible to know whether or not he is using an unedited quote. Also, it is never ok to edit a quote to fit your own agenda.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (July 08, 2009 10:50 am ET)
      9  
      I would like to thank Hannity for so perfectly pointing out the difference between reportage and propaganda. We have enough examples now, Mr. Hannity, feel free to stop creating propaganda as soon as you like!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by larry5569 (July 08, 2009 11:06 am ET)
      6  
      Shammity wouldn't know what to do or say if he didn't crop things!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kfraz43 (July 08, 2009 11:07 am ET)
      12  
      The problem is that this is all the exposure to the news that many people get. I live in a very conservative community, and I hear this crap regurgitated all the time. And the most criminal thing is that Fox is portraying this president as unpatriotic, while in reality it is their insistence upon putting ideology in front of country that is un-American. Deception by the media is bad enough. Deception to incite a negative reaction against the president should be treated as a crime against the state.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by louee (July 08, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
        6  
        While I heartily agree with your post, as an American, I will stand by this idiot's right to spew filth on tv. Our goal must be to turn people away from watching these jackals. Believe me, if nobody watches, they're gone. I don't have many weapons to make this happen, but for what it's worth, I do prosthelytize against them every opportunity I get. People, turn these morons off.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Old_Benjamin (July 08, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
          8  
          I will stand by this idiot's right to spew filth on tv.

          Really? Why stop at that? Why not live sex shows and executions? Where does this "right to spew filth on tv" begin and end?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by franky (July 08, 2009 11:00 pm ET)
            1  
            If you restrict free speech under Democratic control, it will carry over to when Republicans regain power. They would likely abuse the change.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Old_Benjamin (July 09, 2009 11:36 am ET)
              1  
              Free speech does not include a right to a television show.

              And in case you hadn't noticed, there already are restrictions on what can be said/shown on television and radio.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by franky (July 09, 2009 8:30 pm ET)
                1  
                The current restrictions pertain to indecency, not political speech.

                I see how the Right has taken advantage of the law. But as a practical matter I can't imagine how to restrict political speech for the present without setting up a much worse problem down the line when the GOP regains power. Maybe it can be done. I'd like to hear how.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 11:11 am ET)
      12  
      With their willful hatred of facts and reason, with their inflexible ideology, with their twisting and falsification of information, Hannity Republicans have made themselves a threat to our country.

      They need to be stopped before their fascist vision for America becomes our reality too. And for all you dipstick con mf-ers who want to try to tell us that we are trying to silence those with whom we disagree: you can kiss off. Inciters of domestic terrorism like Hannity do not deserve the media platform he was awarded by Fox.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (July 08, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
        7  
        roundhouse, exelent point, truer words were never spoken.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
          12
        The same could be said of the DailyKos and MSNBC on the flip side of the issues.

        Remember dissent is patriotic!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
          7  
          How stupid are you? Hannity offers no dissent. He offers lies and distortions, but feel free to show us where Kos has so blantantly manipulated information to serve their agenda. I won't hold my breath.

          As for MSNBC, they can kiss off too.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
              10
            I'll give you one easy example, the article on Trig not being Palin's baby was on Kos

            Hannity IS dissent to MSNBC and the other networks.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
              4  
              Sorry. no sale. Show me.

              If you want to call lies dissent then I submit that you are another fascist propagandist in the mold of your sniveling tea bag terrorist, Sean Hannity. MSNBC is just another wing of the corporate conservative attack media machine.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
              9  
              I'll give you one easy example, the article on Trig not being Palin's baby was on Kos


              So, you're comparing a liberal blog to a Cable "News" Station? Really? Wow.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
              9  
              Hannity IS dissent to MSNBC and the other networks.

              So, you're admitting that Faux is not "fair and balanced" Thanks.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by mr. l (July 08, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
              7  
              Are you serious? Crappity lies, makes stuff up, slices and dices audio trailers, uses every chance he can to say how dishonest and bad the president is, etc.
              Plus, he is either REALLY dumb (because he gets stuff wrong ALL THE TIME) or he is completely dishonest (because he gets stuff wrong ALL THE TIME)- either way, the *man* is a tool and disseminating lies and propaganda.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by skiploader1111 (July 08, 2009 11:01 pm ET)
              5  
              I searched Dailykos and found no such article.

              Here is a link to my search:

              http://www.dailykos.com/search?offset=0&old_count=30&string=trig+palin&type=story&sortby=time&search=Search&count=30&wayback=1051200&wayfront=0

              Here is a quote from the first Dailykos article ever to mention Trig Palin:
              "I don't think the evidence is there to claim Trig is Bristol's son..."

              http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/1/13540/20367
              Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (July 09, 2009 1:36 am ET)
          4  
          "The same could be said of the DailyKos and MSNBC on the flip side of the issues." - netsez


          Really? Please -- cite when Kos or MSNBC aired cropped quotes of President Bush . . . include date, time, and subject.

          I'll wait.

          "Remember dissent is patriotic!" - netsez

          Funny -- that's not what you wingnuts were claiming just a short time ago; it was not unpatriotic, it was a symptom of some new mental disorder {"Bush Derangement Syndrome"} . . .

          Report Abuse
    • Author by pasteve (July 08, 2009 11:12 am ET)
      13  
      Sadly most of Sean's audience will never know the full quote, and he knows it. Check out Fox Nation where posters brag about never watching anything other than Fox News.

      I know for awhile here somebody was posting the link to a court's decision on Fox News and telling the truth (or not). I guess this is more of the same.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by RobertSeattle (July 08, 2009 11:26 am ET)
      16  
      I'm convinced Fox Viewers WANT to be lied to like this - it makes their lives so much easier to live in the black and white fantasy world of Fox News than deal with reality.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 11:29 am ET)
      8  
      Just for the heck of it, I did a Google search for the cropped Obama quote that leaves out the FACT that he said "I'm very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain." and I found this:

      Obama Can't Even Acknowledge US Won Cold War
      By Bob Ellis on July 8th, 2009
      http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/07/obama-cant-even-acknowledge-us-won-cold-war/

      Total freakin' dirtbags.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kfraz43 (July 08, 2009 11:36 am ET)
        8  
        Thanks for the link - I love the irony of their slogan: "Exposing the Pernicious Lie".

        For the benefit of Fox viewers: "pernicious" means "destructive".

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ctwalker (July 08, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
        5  
        I tried posting a reply to the article you pointed out, but it has to be approved by the moderator first. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for it to be approved.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mleghorn (July 08, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
          4  
          Chris, I read your reply, and Bob Ellis' reply to your reply. If his article left me wondering if he was an idiot, his reply to your reply left me convinced. You simply pointed out that he omitted some key words from the quote of Obama. His reply to that was that you're rushing to the defense of "your messiah" (Where in your reply do you even express an opinon of Obama?) and that you probably didn't read the article. Am I missing something here, or is Bob Ellis a complete idiot? Bob, if you're reading this, can you provide us some evidence to the contrary?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
            5  
            WOW! You call him out for changing Obama's words

            from:

            I'm very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain. But, you know, we don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.


            to:

            We don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.


            And he responds by suggesting you did not even read his piece? WOW! Um, Ellis, he caught your horrific misquote, I think it's safe to say he read your piece.

            Bob Ellis crops President Obama's words to fit under his false headline and he's not man enough to admit it. Dirtbag.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pklute63 (July 08, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
              4  
              I also posted there under "Paul" and the guy is off the wall. He has absolutely lost his mind.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
                4  
                I saw your posts, too. Mine has yet to show up. He's getting peppered but the guy is incapable of acknowledging that he was tricked by Hannity. The splice job by Hannity is particularity well done (at the 40 second mark).
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pklute63 (July 08, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
                  4  
                  And his responses have nothing to do with the fact that people are calling him out for regurgitating Hannity. He is insane.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
                    5  
                    Total whack job.

                    I loved his "Obama grudgingly acknowledged [the US] in the briefest and most shallow of terms when led to it by Garret [sic]" reply to you.

                    Obama said "I'm very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain" in response to Garrett's VERY FIRST QUESTION of the interview.

                    I'm so sick of the lying haters.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pklute63 (July 08, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
                      5  
                      Well he got us...that sounded grudgingly to me...case closed I guess...I'm sure when all the posts came in critizing him, he craweled into a corner, put on his foil hat, stuck his fingers in his ears and went lalalalalalalala.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
                        6  
                        It's just so maddening.

                        He thinks Obama grudgingly said "I'm very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain."

                        He thinks Obama said this so grudgingly that Ellis decided to omit Obama's words entirely from his "Obama Can't Even Acknowledge US Won Cold War" piece.

                        Ellis is a dirtbag.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pklute63 (July 08, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
                          4  
                          Of course it is us that are anti-American and hate America....do you think he still lives in his Mom's basement?
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by open_mind (July 08, 2009 11:31 pm ET)
                        2  
                        He also has stopped allowing my posts on. In the end, these little minds all become the tyrant they fantasize that Obama is.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 11:39 pm ET)
                          2  
                          Ain't that the truth? And they accuse us of silencing dissenting points of view. God, they suck.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by RedRightHand (July 09, 2009 12:15 am ET)
                          2  
                          To paraphrase:

                          They are the change they have been dreading
                          Report Abuse
            • Author by ggoodman4693 (July 09, 2009 5:54 am ET)
              3  
              I told Bob Ellis that Republicans elected Obama. George W. Bush and Richard Cheney basically DROVE most of their own Republican base into the Democrats camp.

              I told Bob Ellis to "quit whining and crying about your life, suck it up, get some Prozac, and get a real job, loser."

              By the way, I refused to vote for Obama. I voted Socialist Workers' Party, which was strongly against the Bailout for the ultra-rich Banksters, AIG Insurance, and Hedge Fund operators. Goldman-Sachs did not need a stimulus to create more jobs for Yacht makers and the French Riviera or wherever they go on vacation.

              Obama taking all the Red Ink from mortgage ponzi schemes and putting it on taxpayers is no more socialist than when Poppy Bush took over all the Savings and Loan Thrifts, wiped out all their bad debts, and auctioned them off back to the same criminals, such as Neil.

              That's how capitalism really works - constant bailouts from workers in the bottom 90%.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by ggoodman4693 (July 09, 2009 5:59 am ET)
              1  
              I forgot to mention:

              Isn't Bob Ellis the name of George W. Bush's cousin at Fox News, the guy who "corrected" ABC and NBC on Gore's victory in Florida, when the numbers suddenly flipped and Bush was suddenly on top?

              Because "Jeb" is John Ellis Bush, I'm pretty sure "Ellis" is one of their "extended bloodlines". It would be more honest if that Dakota site had the disclaimer, "I'm GWB's cousin".
              Report Abuse
        • Author by thelittlethings (July 09, 2009 12:02 am ET)
          1  
          I read all that too and holy crap! That guy is a p*!ck! At least you tried. But honestly, those people are a lost cause. There's no talking to them.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by kfraz43 (July 08, 2009 6:22 pm ET)
        3  
        It reminds me of "Anchorman", when Veronica Corningstone changes Ron Burgundy's signoff on the prompter to "go f*** yourself, San Diego" because she knows Ron never reads his scripts before he goes on the air.

        I think we can say that Bob Ron Burgundy'd that article.

        ...Or did Hannity Veronica Corningstone Bob?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (July 08, 2009 8:01 pm ET)
        1  
        I'd write to him to ask that he grudgingly admit that the text was edited, but why call for change on a conservative forum?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Victor Colorado (July 08, 2009 8:37 pm ET)
          2  
          If I asked him that it would mean that I hate America. He is a waste of time.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by PurpleState (July 08, 2009 8:45 pm ET)
            2  
            Agreed.

            You know, one doesn't have to say "we won" to imply that we won. In fact, I would hate to be a sore winner about wars.

            I dare Hannity to go to Europe and state that the U.S. won the Cold War. I'd dare Michael Savage the same thing, but he can't go to England, so I doubt he'd be very welcome in Europe either.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (July 08, 2009 11:31 am ET)
      7  
      I happened to visit Fox this morning and listened to the whole clip. Not only does he edit the President, he also "translates" for him and then goes on to decry the seating of "Senator Stuart Smalley!" I don't care what your politics are, continually referring to him by a character name is disrespectful for a news agency. You might get away with such on a comedy program, but news organizations should be more professional. (Yes, I know, what was I thinking? This is Fox that we are talking about.)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cripdyke (July 08, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
          4
        I agree it's disrespectful, as disrespecful as calling reagan "President Bonzo" - or perhaps more so, since reagan didn't actually play Bonzo.

        There were many bedtime for bonzo jokes in the 80s. They were disrespectful. But not outrageous.

        what is a little ridiculous is that people on the right absolutely _screamed_ that it was totally inappropriate, and that if you leave an acting career and go on to do good things, you shouldn't be tarred by funny/awkward moments from your acting career for the rest of your life.

        ....and then "Senator Stuart Smalley". yeah, we're going to hear a lot of that. But AF has proved himself quite a thinker and policy wonk, has proved himself a reasonable choice as senator to millions of people in MN. And, I think, he'll prove himself an able - if very left wing, which means he won't get as many pieces of legislation named after him and won't get as many of his original pieces of legislation through the senate - Senator. Someday, we may listen to the right choke on "President Stuart Smalley."

        But I doubt it. He's just not authoritarian enough to want the job. And he wouldn't want to compromise the amount he would need to in order to win the moderates.

        So, criticize faux if you want to, but on this point I think they are disrespectful, condescending, smug, etc... but still within the bounds of common nose-tweaking-of-the-powerful.

        At least they didn't create a false quote or picture to make him look extreme or infantile. I know no one would do that!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 11:42 pm ET)
          2  
          Sorry, I disagree. I think they were out of bounds. Misinformation is never acceptable.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (July 08, 2009 11:44 am ET)
      8  
      Uh-oh. Obama touched the 3rd rail in conservative idol-worship.

      Ya don't talk smack about Reagan or Palin.

      And you better say that Reagan won the Cold War.

      Look out, here comes the faux outrage!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (July 08, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
        7  
        This is so typical of HANNITY. He hates the DEMOCRATS and PRESIDENT OBAMA so much that he will lie,twist and distort the truth to make his RIGHT WING heros look good and the oppositio look bad. HE is not a journalist in any sense of the word. He is a propaganda spreader.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eastcoast (July 08, 2009 11:57 am ET)
      7  
      Did hannity actually say that President Obama should read a history book? I think hannity should pick up a book thats not fiction like the bible on his end table. The repugs and the wingnut talking heads have nothing, they have to resort to lying and make up crap as they go along.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 08, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
        7  
        Particularly ironic since Sean Hannity, at best a high school graduate, ain't exactly a scholar...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NdlovukaziThor (July 08, 2009 6:54 pm ET)
          2  
          He did drop out of NYU and Adelphi... Seems to be a theme among Faux anchors. Beauty queen or college dropout lecturing others on education.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NdlovukaziThor (July 08, 2009 6:56 pm ET)
            2  
            But wait! According to Wiki, Jerry Falwell awarded Hanniteabagger an honorary doctoral degree! That makes up for everything. He are sooper jeenyus.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (July 08, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
        4  
        I was going to reply with the following:
        If you're going to suggest that Hannitard pick up a book, you might as well remind him to grab the crayons while he's at it, or it's doubtful he'll bother to crack it open.

        Then I reconsidered, and thought "what if he picks up the wrong book? Do I really want him desecrating Pride and Prejudice, or or Tom Sawyer, or The Bobbsey Twins by exposing them to the scrutiny borne by his intellect?

        No, I think it's a bad idea all around.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (July 08, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
      6  
      They're a propoganda network plain and simple. News doesn't factor into the equation at all.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (July 08, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
      7  
      Whoa here. Hannity crops out something about Lech Walesa, and the uses Lech Welensa to try and beat up Obama.

      I think my head just exploded!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Pericles (July 08, 2009 12:57 pm ET)
      9  
      The Obama Administration should announce that they'll refuse to do any more FOX interviews until they correct those misleading edits, force Hannity to re-broadcast them un-edited, and refrain from doing that in future.

      In other words, stop the BS, or you're cut off.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eastcoast (July 08, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
      5  
      Hannity is just like every other rightwingnut talking head. These freaks know that their party is crumbling right before their eyes. They would crucify their own mother to try and make the repugs look like they are the best for our country. The really sad part is that some of our fellow Americans watch these idiots and believe the BS that they spew.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (July 08, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
      6  
      Does the right wing really want us to be the Ugly American abroad? Does he expect our leaders to go there and belittle the Russians and Eastern Europe by boasting about our victory in the Cold War.

      I'm surprised that Fox let that last line of President Obama's slip into the context of their message, because it shows how graceful, respectful, and intelligent our President truly is.

      We don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.

      Does Hannity and his gang of fools understand what that last line means? How taking the high road gives us credibility with other nations. We don't have to be the dumb jock, trash talking, nation that apparently the right wing wants us to be. President Obama is Barry Sanders to the Republican Dennis Rodman.

      President Obama has Class and I for one am relieved, thankful, and proud not having to be embarrassed and apologetic whenever our President travels to other nations.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (July 08, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
      8  
      Let me repeat here. Pres Obama is a college graduate, something foreign to Hannity's resume.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
          12
        The most brilliant President ever cannot even remember where he met the love of his life.

        http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/barack_obama_forgets_where_he_met_michelle/

        Remember when people laughed at Bush for these kinds of things?

        Ah, good times...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
          5  
          The most brilliant President ever


          Who is making this claim?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (July 08, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
            4  
            That's what I was going to ask.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
              6
            Historian Michael Beschloss was interviewed Monday on Don Imus’ radio show and he made the claim that President-elect Obama’s IQ is off the charts and that he is the smartest president we have ever had. Here is the meat of the conversation:


            Link here
            http://freedomswings.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/obama-is-our-smartest-president/
            Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
              7  

              Apparently you have zero grasp of facts and reality because you keep citing opinions as fact.

              Try again.

              Where is the consensus and proven facts that Obama is the most brilliant President ever? We'll wait...

              Report Abuse
              • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
                  8
                I never said it was a fact, try again. That historian made the claim and I believe him.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
                  7  
                  I never said it was a fact,


                  Then, why did you say this "The most brilliant President ever cannot....."?

                  You're not very good at this. How typical of a teabagging terrorist.

                  Try again....
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by roundhouse (July 08, 2009 11:46 pm ET)
                    1  
                    btw, I stole your teabag terrorist phrase and I ain't giving it back.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by mjh (July 09, 2009 2:31 am ET)
                  3  
                  "I never said it was a fact, try again. That historian made the claim and I believe him." - nutsez

                  Two clear signs of a true wingnut Fox Comedy Channel devotee:

                  1) They confuse opinion with fact
                  2) They confuse ratings with content
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
          7  
          Remember when people laughed at Bush for these kinds of things?

          Yes, and those who laughed at herr dubyah were called "Anti-American" and "terrorists" and were told they were "hurting the troops".

          "Ah, good times... "
          Report Abuse
          • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
              7
            And in reply we were told "dissent is patriotic!"
            Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
              7  

              And in reply, we were asked, "Why do you hate America?"

              Report Abuse
              • Author by netsez00565 (July 08, 2009 3:13 pm ET)
                  7
                And now we are asked "why are you a racist?"
                Report Abuse
                • Author by harley (July 08, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
                  6 1

                  Yes, the Democratic Party that elected a black president is "racist". Brilliant "logic", you inbred hick.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tman418 (July 09, 2009 1:59 am ET)
                    2  
                    He was actually saying that conservatives are the ones asked "Why are you a racist?"
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by open_mind (July 09, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
                      1  
                      I am actually surprised, but I see very little of that from the left. Lately, it has been Republicans calling people racist prematurely and without a reasonable basis. Especially with regards to the Sotomayor episode.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
              8  
              Dissent IS patriotic. It helps when it is HONEST. This clearly wasnt
              Report Abuse
        • Author by robrob (July 08, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
          6  
          Hey, thanks for the link. Here's a quote from it as an example of RWnut "logic".

          =========
          "So might Obama fib about this? Because he really met Michelle at a law firm job he got through William Ayers and his wife Bernadette Dohrn."

          Report Abuse
        • Author by kfraz43 (July 08, 2009 10:26 pm ET)
          1  
          I actually laughed when I read that as well. It's nice to see some humanity from our leaders on occasion - I almost forgot that my anniversary was today. I'm not really sure what your point is, though.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mjh (July 09, 2009 1:52 am ET)
            2  
            I'm not sure, either.

            I mean, hell -- on the scale of critical things in the universe, I'd rank Obama forgetting where he first met his wife somewhat below Bush forgetting the fact that he said about bin Laden, "I'm not that concerned about him."
            Report Abuse
    • Author by singularity (July 08, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
      15  
      I've been lurking here at MM for a long time now; however, after watching this particular clip, and re-watching it, I was finally compelled to login to my account I created months ago.

      I'm in the corner with a few who have said they stand by this guy's right to free speech, but as someone else asked, when does it end? How far are these guys willing to take it, so it suits their agenda and fits in with their ideaology?

      One of Hannity's favorite line's is: "2009 is the year journalism died" Well Sean, you're right out in front leading the pack.

      I won't paint a broad stroke over every Fox viewer because that's not fair, but it is certainly scary that there are a lot of people out there (in my own family too) who take what they hear on this cable channel as gospel; very scary indeed.

      Keep up the fight MM, we need you!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 08, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
      6  
      Even cropped there's nothing wrong with Obama's statement. I guess Hannity isn't happy unless everyone says St Ronnie destroyed communism single-handed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (July 08, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
        5  
        when you look at the history of the soviet block, you will find, and probably conclude, any elected president at that time would benefic from the crumbling of the soviet block. " tear do3wn that wall " was a brillinat statement resulting from an opportunity that had nothing to do with any proactive thing Reagan had done. No such luck for saint Bush43.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 08, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
        8  
        And you've got to love the painting of the cold war as "Reagan versus Gorbachev - WHO WON?" Give me a break. The ending of the cold war had as much to do with Gorbechev pursing a progressive (from a Russian perspective) agenda (more so, actually) than it did Reagan pursuing a conservative one, from an American perspective.

        What's more - it was "won" via DIPLOMACY. Something completely lost on these neocon clowns. And who was the true benificiary of this victory? It seems to me that we (the U.S.) haven't gained any capitalism or freedom since then. (Arguably we've lost a bit of both!) If Capitalism, and Democracy are the true prizes, then the only beneficiary of America's Cold War "victory" was RUSSIA!

        (These people really can't wrap their tiny brains around complex issues, can thay?!)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (July 08, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
          3  
          It's funny how they want Obama to go over there and throw his weight around because "we won" the cold war but they don't want him or the Dems in congress to govern like they won.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (July 09, 2009 2:04 am ET)
        1  
        "I guess Hannity isn't happy unless everyone says St Ronnie destroyed communism single-handed." - shaggles

        Well, it looks like poor Seannie Poo's just gonna have to remain unhappy -- 'cause it seems China, Russia, NK, Cuba, and Vietnam didn't get the memo . . .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jasendorf (July 08, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
      11  
      Not only did Hannity crop Obama, but he cropped Lech Walesa's comments as well. From the same article Sean quoted in this clip:

      http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005204

      "The 1980s were a curious time--a time of realization that a new age was upon us. Communism was coming to an end. It had used up its means and possibilities. The ground was set for change. But this change needed the cooperation, or unspoken understanding, of different political players. Now, from the perspective of our time, it is obvious that like the pieces of a global chain of events, Ronald Reagan, John Paul II, Margaret Thatcher and even Mikhail Gorbachev helped bring about this new age in Europe. We at Solidarity like to claim more than a little credit, too, for bringing about the end of the Cold War." - Lech Walesa
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (July 08, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
        4  
        Why am I not surprised? Thanks.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (July 08, 2009 8:08 pm ET)
        1  
        The fact is that Walesa said this as an ode to Reagan's passing. Naturally, Walesa would speak of Reagan in glowing terms. Peace in Europe and the end of the Cold War was primarily a collaboration with America as the headpiece.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Gabe ORielly (July 08, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      12  
      After this, nothing more needs be said:

      Ode to Sean Hannity
      by: John Cleese

      Aping urbanity
      Oozing with vanity
      Plump as a manatee
      Faking humanity
      Journalistic calamity
      Intellectual inanity
      Fox Noise insanity
      You're a profanity
      Sean Hannity
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seroquel (July 08, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
      9  
      No, Sean, YOU crack open a history book.
      This is outrageous he can get away with this?
      Hello abuse of freedom of speech.
      Will it ever stop? What's the line Fox has to cross before being taken off the air?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pklute63 (July 08, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
        4  
        Not that it will do any good, but I fired off an email to my senator today and linked this issue to him....someone has got to start taking notice of this garbage besides MMfA.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (July 08, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
      5  
      These goons are literally make up the news. They are out-Pravdaing Pravda.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by daleski22 (July 08, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
      5  
      Surprised Hannity didn't say "And maybe President Obama can borrow that history book from his buddy Bill Ayers!"

      Hannity: Pure propagandistic drivel as always.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jonesjax2374 (July 08, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
        5  
        Disgusting. He should be ashamed. I'd say there ought to be some journalistic FINE for this kind of irresponsible reporting, but he's not a journalist. He's just a lying pig.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Litwiz (July 08, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
      5  
      I too have sat out the discussions on MMA, choosing instead to read what others have said. However, after a recent visit to a FOX home (sadly, my parents') and the endless lies that FOX viewers believe, it has become nearly unbearable to think that otherwise discerning people will simply give up their rationality in favor of comfort. Such is the pap Sean Hannity provides for people with a certain world view. It is meant to fill, not to nourish. I wonder how many of Mr. Hannity's viewers lack a college education like he does. Was dropping out of two universities the result of an inability to reason? To sort through facts and form an opinion? To tell fact from fiction? Certainly his behavior now indicates that he can do neither. And to get a FOX viewer to just check out a few of Hannity's statements on another station is tantamount to asking him or her to view the story of Noah and the Ark as a metaphor or fable. It's blasphemy and frightening for him/her. So if the FOX viewer won't search out more "nutritious" news, maybe we need to publically hold FOX accountable for the pap...in a more public way than MMA. Keith Olbermann does so, as does Rachel and Ed on MSNBC. But we need more. And we need to be louder.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 08, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
        4  
        Hannity (like the other professional liars) do what they do not because of ideology, not because of deeply-held beliefs, but only because of the MONEY.

        They have a ready-made audience that thrives on hate and fear.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pam95650 (July 08, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
      3  
      Ya think Hannity should have a lesson on dignity? After all, he did agree to be water-boarded, but to my knowledge, he hasn't done that yet.

      What a POS.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (July 08, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
      2  
      despicable attempt at simply quoting somebody's words. the right always complains about how liberals take their words out of context, but at least they supply the full quote. wingnuts just completely crop out parts of the quote and pretend it is legitimate. dishonesty like that is hard to fathom.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jkempter1296 (July 08, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
      2  
      Isn't there some way this cretin's actions can become news on anything other than MM?
      He needs to be outed.
      Someone needs to produce a two hour long saga about Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck, et al. Show these people at work; show how they mislead, lie and contort facts for nothing but their own avarice.
      These "commentators", more like "story tellers", hold up the banner of patriotism and constantly misuse the good name of our country.
      These people are true traitors.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BigRenman (July 08, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
      2  
      Back to the subject: This has to be illegal - presenting "news" with edited footage. Can't be legal.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shag11 (July 08, 2009 7:46 pm ET)
      2  
      Why in the hell do Dems. keep going on this network?! Obama even acknowledge recently that he doesn't did a fair shake from them. My brother told me the other day that he watches them so that he can see what the other side is doing. For what? They lie, they smear, they "crop," they make-up sh..!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mfinn7314 (July 08, 2009 7:50 pm ET)
      3  
      What's "Unbelievable" Hannity is your blatant dishonesty and penchant for manufactuing controversy from nothing to try to damage those on the other side of the political spectrum. As a Catholic, I know what you did here and many other similar transgressions are sins. You don't get forgiven if you're not truly repentent and trying not to repeat the sins.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave_82 (July 08, 2009 8:35 pm ET)
      1  
      Fox is Fair and Balanced!

      Fair to the right wing and trying to tip the balance in its favour.

      Sean, is a waste of perfectly good air time. Imagine the un-American up roar if anyone did the is a Neo-Con like him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LIBERTY OR DEATH (July 08, 2009 8:45 pm ET)
        6
      Obama’s historical pronouncements are merely rhetorical props for whichever policies he is pursuing at the moment. These props are fed to him–as Mr. Gibbs noted–by his speechwriters, and as long as they prop up the proper liberal ideals, he will spout them without vetting, indeed, without thinking. In this, he is not specifically complicit, merely an enabler.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
        5  
        So then you are not only dumb as a post but brainwashed to an embarassing extent. You do know that Obama writes some of his own speeches dont you? Including the acceptance speech at the convention that was widely lauded. Its ok to be partisan but when you are brainwashed enough to spout idiocy like your post above you just humiliate yourself
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Craig (July 08, 2009 11:09 pm ET)
          6  
          Not just dumb and brainwashed. Lazy and unoriginal, too. His entire post is a copy-and-paste job from a Pajamas Media commenter.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by robertbobby919565 (July 08, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
        6
      Maybe I'm missing something, but could you tell me exactly how it was spinned? The point Obama made seems the same in both versions.

      Obama made is look as if America couldn't do it without eastern Europe's support. The reality is that Eastern Europe couldn't do it without US backing, which Hannity made it clear with the polish quote.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 08, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
        4  
        The thing is both were necessary. Its like the QB saying that HE won the game and taking all the credit as if the blocking, running and recievers didnt have any part in it at all. Obama made it clear he was proud of OUR contribution and made the obvious and important point that we shouldnt forget to give credit to the brave people in places like Poland and Czhechoslovakia that also struggled for the freedom they gained. The last sentence said it all.

        We don't have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.

        Notice he DID aknowlege our contribution.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kfraz43 (July 08, 2009 10:38 pm ET)
          4  
          Exactly. In the complete quote, he credits many different people, including us - his overriding message was that we don't have to ignore the contributions of others to get credit for ourselves. Hannity makes his quote sound like he didn't credit our contribution at all. The black and white, all-or-nothing nature of right wing media, and by extension the right wing audience that tunes in, is now tone deaf to subtlety and nuance, which is what Obama's response was based upon. This is a man who speaks with thoughtful pause, not "gut reaction".

          As a buddy of mine once said, "if you're comfortable with the size of your package, you don't have to run around telling people how big your package is". This bravado is the right wing projecting their insecurity, and it would be damn entertaining if it weren't so damn scary.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (July 09, 2009 2:47 am ET)
        2  
        "Obama made is look as if America couldn't do it without eastern Europe's support. The reality is that Eastern Europe couldn't do it without US backing . . ." - robertbobby


        "Reality" according to WHO? Didja ever think that, according to the Eastern Europeans, WE couldn't have done it without THEIR backing??
        Report Abuse
    • Author by myamed09 (July 09, 2009 12:23 am ET)
      1  

      i dont get it is hannity a reporter or the leader of the opposition he has absolutely forgotten the basics of journalism the elections are over done with obama is the president as far as i know obama said it well there is only one president at a time live with it
      Report Abuse
    • Author by doubleaseven (July 09, 2009 12:58 am ET)
      1  
      Most egregious exmple of this man's mendacious cropping is the whole "Apokogy Tour" garbage. He was in fact joined by all GOPers in spreading this lie. He keptb only the first part of his comment on America-Europe relationship. He said "We have been arrogant...on the other hand there has been anti-Americanizsm here, ... which blames everything bad on America, ignoring all the good Ammerica has done".

      The right wingers led by Hannity complete chopped off the other hand and used the first part for their nefarious Anti-Obama propaganda. They question the President's patriotism and thump their chest like a Gorilla to show their Patriotism. They believe this kind of blatant self-aggrandizement will make the world to cow-tow to the mighty USA. These ignoramuses do not realize that their approach will only bolster hatred and disdain for our country. Certainly damages our aganda of being a leader of the new world.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (July 09, 2009 3:20 am ET)
      2  
      It amazes me that there are 1-3 devout Conservatives, sitting "thumbing down" every single comment that agrees with the article. Did they even bother to check it? Is Sean Hannity so holy, that they can't admit that "hey, wait a minute, Obama DID actually mention what Hannity was angry at him for NOT saying"?

      Apparantely... Let's see how many thumbs down I'll get, from people who are on this site to do nothing other than "thumb down" and not read the articles!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (July 09, 2009 3:53 am ET)
        2  
        You seem to miss the point of our resident Cons..

        That don't need to read anything. They don't need to think. All they need is to listen to thier supreme leaders, Rush, SeannieTheSissyBoy or just Fox News. Tehn and only then do they appear, puke up what they just heard and go away. "No Knowledge Necessary". is a sign posted above the doors of the news rooms at Fox. Before anyone enters, the reach up and touch it. It gives them a good feeling.
        For example, yesterday afternoon, Wednesday, the Pirates played a day game and there was NO Rush or Hannity. My Connies, not commies, couldn't discuss anything. Thier thought process is nil without the daily verbal injection of ninconpoop information.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by digeeedad9143 (July 09, 2009 4:21 am ET)
      2  
      Hannity fills his shows radio and TV daily with half-truths, innuendo and outright lies. Right before the election, he told his radio audience..."There is no ecomomic crisis/ Unemployment rates are the best they've been in decades, our businesses are strong and our GNP is the best it has been in years! This is all just Obama lies.... a ploy to get elected"!

      Hannity had 2 one hour Fox News specials right before the election, which were nothing short of despicable in his smears, lies and outright hatred towards the Obamas.

      If you have never done so, visit his website forum "Washington Politics" sometime, for a REAL eye opener into who this man really is! For a very long time, one of Hannity's forum MODERATORS had as his Username Avatar, a short video clip of a white male cocking a huge pistol and shooting it into the air. A cartoon figure of a black man then fell head first to the gtound in front of the shooter! Based on his own standards of "guilt by association", Hannity is responsible and apparently condones all the hate-filled, bigoted, seditious, and outright racist posts there!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by peets101 (July 09, 2009 10:59 am ET)
      2  
      Can you imagine being married to Hannity and having to constantly carry a tape recorder to deal with who's turn it is to take out the garbage today?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ThePest420 (July 09, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
        4
      You guys are pathetic. If you say Sean "cropped" the video then why don't you have the whole interview on your site???
      Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (July 09, 2009 9:47 pm ET)
        2  
        What are you talking about, moron? They do have the complete relevant stuff. They don't need to show the whole interview to show that he cropped Obama's quote!

        Weak.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (July 09, 2009 11:05 pm ET)
        1  
        That has to be one the dumbest comments ever posted on the internet. I'm leaning towards the theory that you're acting, and if that's the case, you deserve kudos for creative cretinism.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.