About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring Alito vote, NY Times quotes Sessions saying empathy has "no place in the courtroom"

July 14, 2009 9:00 am ET
image

SUMMARY: In an article on Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearings, The New York Times quoted Sen. Jeff Sessions' assertion that empathy "has no place in the courtroom," but did not note that he voted to confirm Samuel Alito, who discussed the importance of his personal experience during his confirmation hearings.

8 Comments

In a July 14 article on the first day of Judge Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, The New York Times reported that "Republicans made clear they would use the hearings to portray her as willing to tilt the scales of justice to address her personal feelings about the cases before her" and quoted Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) saying: "Call it empathy, call it prejudice, or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it's not law. In truth it's more akin to politics. And politics has no place in the courtroom." But the article did not note that during his confirmation hearings in 2006, Justice Samuel Alito highlighted his compassion for people involved in immigration and discrimination cases and discussed the importance of his personal experience. Sessions, along with 53 of his 54 Republican colleagues then in the Senate, voted to confirm Alito.

Numerous other conservatives have also stressed the importance of personal experience and of compassion in judicial nominees.

Moreover, the article reported that Republicans "bored in on [Sotomayor's] comment in a speech in 2001 that a 'wise Latina' would make better decisions in some cases than a white male, as well as other speeches in which she emphasized her gender, ethnicity and compassion. Four of the panel's seven Republicans invoked the 'wise Latina' reference to criticize her." But the article failed to provide the context for those comments. Contrary to the suggestion that Sotomayor was commenting on the general judicial ability of Latinas and white men, when Sotomayor asserted, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life," she was specifically discussing the importance of judicial diversity in determining race and sex discrimination cases.

Indeed, as Media Matters for America has noted, former Bush Justice Department lawyer John Yoo has written that Justice Clarence Thomas "is a black man with a much greater range of personal experience than most of the upper-class liberals who take potshots at him" and argued that Thomas' work on the court has been influenced by his understanding of the less fortunate acquired through personal experience.

From Alito's 2006 confirmation hearing:

ALITO: I don't come from an affluent background or a privileged background. My parents were both quite poor when they were growing up.

And I know about their experiences and I don't -- I didn't experience those things. I don't take credit for anything that they did or anything that they overcame, but I think that children learn a lot from their parents and they learn from what the parents say. But I think they learn a lot more from what the parents do and from what they take from the stories of their parents' lives.

And that's why I went into that in my opening statement. Because when a case comes before me involving, let's say, someone who is an immigrant -- and we get an awful lot of immigration cases and naturalization cases -- I can't help but think of my own ancestors, because it wasn't that long ago when they were in that position.

And so, it's my job to apply the law. It's not my job to change the law or to bend the law to achieve any result, but I have to -- when I look at those cases, I have to say to myself, and I do say to myself, "You know, this could be your grandfather; this could be your grandmother. They were in -- they were not citizens at one time, and they were people who came to this country."

When I have cases involving children, I can't think -- help but think of my own children and think about my children being treated in the way that children may be treated in the case that's before me. And that goes down the line.

When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account. When I have a case involving someone who's been subjected to discrimination because of disability, I have to think of people who I've known and admire very greatly who have had disabilities, and I've watched them struggle to overcome the barriers that society puts up often just because it doesn't think of what it's doing -- the barriers that it puts up to them.

So, those are some of the experiences that have shaped me as a person.

From the July 14 New York Times article:

Judge Sonia Sotomayor opened her case for confirmation to the Supreme Court on Monday by assuring senators that she believes a judge's job "is not to make law" but "to apply the law," as the two parties used her nomination to debate the role of the judiciary.

Responding for the first time to weeks of Republican criticism, Judge Sotomayor rejected the notion that personal biases determine her rulings and said her 17 years on the bench showed that she "applied the law to the facts at hand." Her empathy helps her grasp a case, not twist it to suit an agenda, she said.

"My personal and professional experiences help me to listen and understand," she told the Senate Judiciary Committee, "with the law always commanding the result in every case."

Before she spoke, Republicans made clear they would use the hearings to portray her as willing to tilt the scales of justice to address her personal feelings about the cases before her.

They bored in on her comment in a speech in 2001 that a "wise Latina" would make better decisions in some cases than a white male, as well as other speeches in which she emphasized her gender, ethnicity and compassion.

Four of the panel's seven Republicans invoked the "wise Latina" reference to criticize her, with one, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, saying, "my career would have been over" if he had said something like that.

The ranking Republican on the panel, Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, said: "Call it empathy, call it prejudice, or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it's not law. In truth it's more akin to politics. And politics has no place in the courtroom."

The start of hearings on President Obama's nomination of Judge Sotomayor, who would be the first Hispanic and third woman to sit on the Supreme Court, was permeated with electoral politics, with Republicans taking pains not to offend Hispanic voters even as they sought to assure conservatives that they were vigorously challenging Judge Sotomayor and Mr. Obama on ideological grounds.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 14, 2009 9:54 am ET)
      2 1
      Four of the panel's seven Republicans invoked the "wise Latina" reference to criticize her, with one, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, saying, "my career would have been over" if he had said something like that.
      Graham's career should be over for his demonstrated stupidity in being unable to understand the statements that Sotomayor actually said. If I lied as blatantly in my job as Graham does in his, my career would be over, too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 14, 2009 10:10 am ET)
        2  
        This is what I don't get. For the most part, these guys are pretty smart, and somewhat savvy, they have to be to get this far in politics, regardless of how they appear.

        What they have apparently forgot, or realized, is once again, the context of the comment itself.

        If Graham had said something like Sotomayor did, along the lines of his experiences in life, he of course would still have his job.

        What these a-holes seem to keep forgetting is that our experiences, and our lives inform and affect our lives, personal AND professional. I take my job experience, and life experience, and combine them to try and make me the best professional that I can be.

        Her comment is not crazy, it's not racist, and it's been taken out of context over and over and over again. For smart men, these guys are sure acting like idiots.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (July 14, 2009 10:15 am ET)
        2  
        One thing for sure is that Graham messed up on was when he said to the good judge...

        "Short of having a meltdown, you are going to be confirmed"

        Near as I can tell it was a Freudian slip. The next couple weeks (or however long the confirmation is), is going to be the Republicans doing all they can to get her to have a 'meltdown' so that they can have their little excuses.

        ERW,

        Lindsay Graham understood all to well... I believe that was just a small example of what we can expect from the right-wing neanderthals the next several days/weeks.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (July 14, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
           
        nator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, saying, "my career would have been over" if he had said something like that
        His Navy career would also have been over had he admitted he was gay.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by revjmike (July 14, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
         
      They are looking for some reason to dismiss Sotomayor; and it doesn't matter what it is.

      Their real objective is to make WHITE Americans question her impartiality; and after all these years of us poor, white folk being downtrodden and neglected, you can see why they would feel that way NOT.

      They are actually attempting to improve their standing with Caucasians; and I believe that's it. Otherwise they'd just pass her on without weeks of her having to listen to their drivel.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dissenting Justice (July 14, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
      4  
      Hello. Great piece. For the record, I have also written on this subject. I believe two additional points are relevant. First, conservative judges have frequently argued against policies like "affirmative action" by focusing on "innocent whites" and "white victims." Also, legal standards themselves often require a focus on "empathy," although they may not use this word explicitly.

      In the recent strip search case, for example, 8 justices on the Supreme Court held that a school violated the Fourth Amendment by subjecting a female student to a strip search (looking for Advil). The standard the Court applied required it to consider the subjective reactions of the person subjected to the search and to consider explcitly how age and sex might impact the person's reaction. The Court also cited to psychological data to support its conclusion that strip searches inflict a particularized emotional trauma upon teenagers. 8 members of the Court -- including the conservatives -- applied a standard that required them to empathize with the plaintiff. See Justice Thomas: A Little Empathy Please!

      Finally, Republicans are trying to create "empathy" for white victims of affirmative action by inviting non-lawyer Frank Ricci to testify against Sotomayor. Senate Republicans have also stated during interviews that the majority of the public disagrees with Sotomayor's views on affirmative action. But, this argument condemns Sotomayor for not conforming her rulings to public opinion and for ruling against a "sympathetic" white plaintiff.

      Apparently, empathy is only problematic when it leads to liberal outcomes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 14, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
           
        Good points
        Report Abuse
      • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (July 14, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
           
        The law without considering empathy leads to the Salem Witch Trials, Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson. People who presuppose that empathy has no place in court decisions are lying to themselves.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace