About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hour 3: Limbaugh Defends Sessions From Attacks By "State-Run Media"

July 14, 2009 4:11 pm ET

8 Comments

This hour of the Limbaugh Wire brought to you by Ronald Reagan Iran-Contra Washington National Airport
By Greg Lewis

Rush got the final hour rolling by reading reports that more that 43,000 children go to emergency rooms every year after slipping in a bathtub. Rush reminisced about his childhood -- riding his bicycle without a helmet, running errands for his mother, his injuries from playing baseball when he was 12. Kids today are worried about stupid polar bears dying, whereas 50 years ago, we were worried about the Russians nuking us. Anyway, Rush's trip down memory lane was to make the point about how things today are different than they were when Rush was a youngster.

Rush came back from the break with a brand new comedy bit for us to enjoy -- a parody of Obama's speech in Michigan today, which, until today, had been scheduled as a town hall. The parody must have been thrown together on very short notice, and trust us when we say the quality of the bit reflected the time constraints... Anyway, Rush moved on to more sound bites from the Sotomayor hearing today, heaping praise on Sen. Jeff Sessions for his "terrific" questioning. Rush said Sessions dissected every one of her statements and properly analyzed it. Rush played audio of Sotomayor defending her comments at Duke University Law School in 2005, when she said the "court of appeals is where policy is made." Rush said that she was fudging what she really meant in order to get confirmed. Actually, her testimony is completely in line with what she said in 2005 if you actually consider the comment in context.

Then Rush went back to the Ricci case, repeating his claim from the first hour of today's broadcast that Sotomayor "buried" what she really believed, and she wasn't citing precedent like she claimed she was. You can scroll up the page to see our rebuttal. Continuing, Rush elaborated on his feelings about "precedent." If your thought process is like Sotomayor's, explained Rush, and you thought that precedent meant that you have to go for precedent every time, then we'd still have slavery.

After another break, Rush moved on to Sotomayor's defense of her "wise Latina" remarks, and her explanation that it was a "rhetorical flourish" based on something said by Sandra Day O'Connor. Rush explained that this is why Sotomayor is "dangerous":

LIMBAUGH: She couldn't have meant what she said. If she can say that about Sandra Day O'Connor, she could look at the Constitution and say, "They didn't mean that." And this one little example is all you need to know how dangerous this woman is. Your Constitution -- our Constitution is not safe with this woman interpreting it.

Then Rush continued to gloat about how "effective" Sessions was, and how the state-run media are talking about it. He aired audio of Chris Matthews and Richard Wolffe on MSNBC discussing how Sessions was playing "racial politics." Au contraire, said Rush:

LIMBAUGH: She's the racist, and they turn it around and say that Sessions is the racist. Sotomayor is the one who used the word -- or the phrase "wise Latina" and "the richness of her experiences" would make her a better judge than the average white guy. She is the racist.

Here's the amusing thing: Rush has no problem saying "wise Latina" over and over, ripping it out of context, and declaring Sotomayor a "racist," but when someone in the media says Sessions is playing "racial politics," Rush pronounces that ridiculous, but won't get into anything Sessions actually said today. Well, a quick review of Sessions' comments from today would have given some much needed context -- he invoked a Puerto Rican judge's ancestry in explaining why Sotomayor should have voted with him, and he (in the words of Jeffrey Toobin) adopted a "line of questioning" based on the notion "that being a white man, that's normal. Everybody else has biases and prejudices."

The next sentence in Rush's monologue led straight back to his bizarre obsession with rape:

LIMBAUGH: State-run media attacks Jeff Sessions. 'Cause he's from Alabama, why, he's got to be a racist; just like those three kids at Duke had to rape that dancer. She was black, she was poor, she was a dancer; they're rich elite athletes at a power school -- of course they raped her! We don't even need to know the facts; of course they did. Uh, no, they didn't. OK, never mind. So, now, Jeff Sessions is the racist.

The next caller on the program went back to the bathtub story, explaining that in her experience working in emergency rooms, most people who go to emergency rooms do not go for actual emergencies. Rush understands this, relating it to his theory on our society's "health panic," describing it as a combination of media, affluence, and medical advancements creating unnecessary hospital visits.

Then, in introducing a story about an airline for pets, Rush took a quick swipe at Baltimore-Washington International Airport for being named after Thurgood Marshall:

LIMBAUGH: There's an airline, it'll be operating out of Baltimore, Baltimore-Washington International -- Thurgood Marshall Baltimore-Washington International Brown versus Board of Education Airport. See if I can say that again: Thurgood Marshall Baltimore-Washington International Brown versus Board of Education Airport.

One more break, and Rush concluded the show with a caller who was upset with Rush's comments from earlier in the hour about why Sotomayor is dangerous. The caller said it was a stretch to say that Sotomayor would look at the Constitution and say that it's not what the founders meant based on what she said about O'Connor's statements today. Rush disagreed and played the clip from the hearings today again to prove his point.

That's all for the Limbaugh Wire today. We hope you'll join us tomorrow for another day of priceless commentary from El Rushbo on the third day of the Sotomayor hearings. Meanwhile, get a sense of everything Rush has said about Sotomayor (again and again and again) by taking a peek at our comprehensive and thorough Limbaugh Wire archives.

Simon Maloy, Zachary Pleat, and Ariana Probinsky contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh Wire.

Highlights from Hour 3

Outrageous comments

LIMBAUGH: She couldn't have meant what she said. If she can say that about Sandra Day O'Connor, she could look at the Constitution and say, "They didn't mean that." And this one little example is all you need to know how dangerous this woman is. Your Constitution -- our Constitution is not safe with this woman interpreting it.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: She's the racist, and they turn it around and say that Sessions is the racist. Sotomayor is the one who used the word -- or the phrase "wise Latina" and "the richness of her experiences" would make her a better judge than the average white guy. She is the racist.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: There's an airline, it'll be operating out of Baltimore, Baltimore-Washington International -- Thurgood Marshall Baltimore-Washington International Brown versus Board of Education Airport. See if I can say that again: Thurgood Marshall Baltimore-Washington International Brown versus Board of Education Airport.

Ladies' man

LIMBAUGH: State-run media attacks Jeff Sessions. 'Cause he's from Alabama, why, he's got to be a racist; just like those three kids at Duke had to rape that dancer. She was black, she was poor, she was a dancer; they're rich elite athletes at a power school -- of course they raped her! We don't even need to know the facts; of course they did. Uh, no, they didn't. OK, never mind. So, now, Jeff Sessions is the racist.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Conchobhar (July 14, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
      3  
      Well, maybe appearance are deceiving and Sessions is not a racist.
      I'm willing to entertain that possibility, in spite of the fact that he was, in a bipartisan vote, rejected by this very committee (oh, the ironies of life) for a federal judgeship, because he appeared to be one. Calling a black lawyer "boy," and calling the NAACP an "un-American, Commie organization," because they were "trying to force civil rights on people," will tend to make you look racist, even if you're only terminally stupid.

      I'm also willing to entertain the possibility (for about three seconds) that Rush is not a disingenuous narcissist. Svelte, too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by skepticplease (July 14, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
      4 1
      A Modest Proposal

      I had an epiphany the other day when a committed conservative I know said, "I'm really concerned that people watch The Daily Show and Colbert Report and think it's real news!"

      It occurs to me that we will know Americans have returned to the responsibilities of airwave ownership when it is most common to hear people say things like:

      "Rush Limbaugh? Sean Hannity? Ann Coulter? Michael Savage? Aren't they like Steven Colbert...but not funny?"

      This simply has to happen because we are spending way too much time and energy fact-checking the daily tidal wave of nonsense these charlatans spew. Isn't it reasonable at this time to conclude that whatever credibility they may desire has been completely forfeited?

      We really ought to be embarrassed that we took this long to place them in their proper genre. Perhaps if enough of us just keep saying (snickering condescendingly), "Rush and Colbert, what a couple of nuts! Yeah, they're kind of funny sometimes," people will be embarrassed to offer their nonsense as legitimate. They would be made to sound like the hypothetical numbskull who'd say, "I was motivated to join the conservative movement by Colbert."

      It seems obvious that many of the commenters on this site spend considerable amounts of time informing themselves, searching for the truth, and refining their baloney detection skills.

      Is anyone else as frustrated as I that truth hasn't had much of an impact on the faithful. In fact, the rule I read somewhere about explainers being losers seems all too true.

      All I am saying is give shame a chance! Any takers? It won't be easy, but the conservatives above have taught us that religiously staying on message trumps that silly old ornament called truth every time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (July 14, 2009 6:44 pm ET)
        4 1
        Amazing that Sessions with his long history of publicly expressed racism is the darling of Rush. Just shows once again Sessions is not to be trusted with coming to any factual conclusions in situations like involving race. His badgering of Sotomayor is called projection and it is so obvious that anyone who knows about his racist days knows he has no room to talk about racism. It is sort of fun though seeing those FEW Republicans show their racism so obviously. In Sessions past, he was probably a Klucker (KKK), and now he attempts to make a point about Sotomayor's racism. Unbelievable! But alas, with Republicans stripped down to minority status, and having no ability to stop the nomination, they still have to pile on this obvious racism. Poor, poor things. Seems they have a death wish. Here in Arizona, Hispanics are closely watching them parade their hate filled rhetoric in front of the whole world.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 15, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
             
          You can be conservtaive these days, and you sure can't defened them, if you don't LOVE L-O-V-E LOVE hypocrisy, as if it were the greatest cardinal virtue. And Rush himslef has recently try to argue that you can't HAVE morality w/o hypocrisy! This is, of course, bat$#!t f--king insanity, but hey - that's Rush for you! So baiscally: If you're a conservative hypocrite, then you're Rush's golden hero. If you're a liberal make a principled argument, then your just a hypocrite. (Again - the world according to Rush.)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 15, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
             
          You can't be conservtaive these days, and you sure can't defened them, if you don't LOVE L-O-V-E LOVE hypocrisy, as if it were the greatest cardinal virtue. And Rush himself has recently tried to argue that you can't HAVE morality w/o hypocrisy! This is, of course, bat$#!t f--king insanity, but hey - that's Rush for you! So basicly: If you're a conservative hypocrite, then you're Rush's golden hero. If you're a liberal making a principled, logical argument, then your just a hypocrite. (Again - the world according to Rush.)
          Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.