On Fox, scant attention to Dems' questioning of Sotomayor
SUMMARY: On July 15, Fox News covered two Republicans senators' "first round" questioning of Sonia Sotomayor for 55 minutes, but it covered only 30 minutes of the six Democratic senators' "first round" questions that the committee heard on July 15.
In its July 15 coverage of the Senate Judiciary Committee's "first round" of questioning of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, Fox News devoted 55 minutes to questioning by Republicans while devoting only 30 minutes to Democrats' questioning, despite the fact that Democratic senators who asked questions on the second day of the "first round" outnumbered Republicans six to two. By contrast, MSNBC and CNN devoted more time to the Democrats, but not in proportion to their greater numbers.
Media Matters for America reviewed coverage of the eight Senate Judiciary Committee members who each questioned Sotomayor for 30 minutes in their "first round" of questioning on July 15: Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Tom Coburn, and Democratic Sens. Ben Cardin, Sheldon Whitehouse, Amy Klobuchar, Edward Kaufman, Arlen Specter, and Al Franken.
Fox News covered 11 minutes each of Cardin's and Franken's questioning, eight minutes of Specter's, and none of the questioning by Whitehouse, Klobuchar, and Kaufman. By contrast, Fox covered the entire 30 minutes of Cornyn's questioning period and all but five minutes of Coburn's 30 minutes of questions.


















Dems had 180 minutes of questioning but CNN broadcast less than half of it. Repubs had 60 minutes yet CNN aired all but 6 minutes.
So fairness according to you and CNN is airing almost all of the Repubs but less than half of the Dems. And I'm not even going to get into the atrocity that is Fox.
CNN
D: 41%
R: 90%
MSNBC
D: 31%
R: 87%
FOX
D: 17%
R: 90%
In the corner.
To himself.
Why anyone still uses WebTV is beyond me. But those who do should apologize and explain with every post they make.
BUT... What would really drvie this home for me, would be to know it the same thign was true during the Alito & Roberts hearsings. Did the Dem's (as both the minority party and the opposition party to the one that made the nomination, just like the republicans are now) recieve a disproportinately large amount of covergae, relative to the republicans, during THOSE hearing? I have to admit that I don't really know, but somehow I doubt it. But KNOWING THAT would give a good bit more legitimacy to the MMFA post here. If they republicans were over-represented then AND now, therw would be just no holes in what MMFA is implying here.
So much for Fair and Balanced I suppose