About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Buchanan falsely suggests Sotomayor has "never written" law review articles

July 17, 2009 9:37 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Pat Buchanan claimed that Sonia Sotomayor has "never written anything that I've read in terms of a law review article or a major book or something like that on the law." In fact, Sotomayor has published several law review articles.

37 Comments

Asserting that Judge Sonia Sotomayor is not qualified to serve on the Supreme Court, MSNBC analyst Pat Buchanan claimed during the July 16 edition of MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show that Sotomayor has "never written anything that I've read in terms of a law review article or a major book or something like that on the law." In fact, according to her Judiciary Committee questionnaire, Sotomayor has published several law review articles, including a note she wrote while a student at Yale Law School and a law review article adapted from a speech she gave.

Moreover, in response to host Rachel Maddow's question, "Why do you think it is that of the 110 Supreme Court justices we've had in this country, 108 of them have been white?" Buchanan again falsely claimed that "100 percent of the people who died at Gettysburg" were white men. He added: "This has been a country built, basically, by white folks in this country." However, at least one African-American and one woman disguised as a male soldier reportedly died in the Gettysburg campaign.

According to PBS, during the Civil War, "More than 200,000 blacks fought for the Union, and 38,000 died, the majority of disease." In The Colors of Courage: Gettysburg's Forgotten History: Immigrants, Women, and African Americans in the Civil War's Defining Battle (Basic Books, 2004), Bates College professor of history Margaret Creighton writes that an unnamed African-American was the third Union soldier killed in "the Gettysburg campaign":

Most African American men in Pennsylvania were denied the opportunity to fight the Confederates with weapons. But not all of them. One company of black men helped hold back invading soldiers, and their efforts, considered one of the first military engagements in the war by men of color, is still overlooked. The site of the action was the Columbia-Wrightsville bridge, a span a mile and a quarter long over the Susquehanna River. Before word had come of the Army of the Potomac's move north from Virginia, General Lee and corps commander Richard Ewell had envisioned taking Harrisburg from the east and south. The bridge over the Susquehanna River -- twenty-five miles southest of the capital -- was key. On June 28th, and emergency Pennsylvania militia unit and a company of African American men recruited form the area -- numbering at least fifty -- attempted to hold the bridge against 2500 seasoned Confederate troops (including artillery), until the bridge could be destroyed. "The negros," commented one observer, "did nobly." The officer in command of the milita had even more to say. "When the fight commenced," he reported, the black company "took their guns and stood up to their work bravely. They fell back only when ordered to do so." One of the black volunteers paid the ultimate price for his work: His head was "taken off by a shell." As one historian has pointed out, this man -- no one knows his name -- was only the third Northern soldier killed in the Gettysburg campaign. [emphasis added] (Pages 134-135)

Moreover, according to historian Jane Peters Estes, as quoted in a presentation at the Camden Country (NJ) Historical Society, women, too, died in the Civil War, including at least one woman in the Battle of Gettysburg. Estes also noted that on the Union side, "Marie Tepe was wounded at the Battle of Fredericksburg, where she took a ball in her ankle, and she served under fire in 13 battles, including Gettysburg." On November 16, 2002, a 7-foot bronze sculpture of Elizabeth Thorn (1832-1907) was dedicated in Evergreen Cemetery in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The statue, titled "The Gettysburg Civil War Women's Memorial," honors all the women who served in various capacities before, during, and following the Battle of Gettysburg.

Buchanan also claimed that "probably close to 100 percent of the people who died at Normandy" were white men. He previously falsely claimed that "all the dead at Normandy" were white males. Buchanan's comments again denigrated the service that minorities played at Normandy or in World War II. According to a History Channel documentary, "1.2 million African-Americans served in World War II, and although largely forgotten by history, nearly 2,000 of them stormed the beaches of Normandy." According to a May 5, 2004, Scripps Howard News Service report, "[B]lacks were among the assault troops that June 6 [1944], and one unit was responsible for maintaining barrage balloons over the beachhead that protected troops landing. The Stars and Stripes newspaper in 1944 reported that the unit suffered casualties setting up the balloons, which were floated across the English Channel on invasion day. ... The Army didn't record racial or ethnic differences when counting the dead. [Photographer Samuel LeBon] Wooten said he knows of at least three blacks buried in the American cemetery on the bluffs overlooking Omaha Beach at Coleville-sur-Mer." In an interview broadcast on NPR on February 21, 2007, filmmaker Doug Cohen stated that at least two soldiers from all-African-American units died on June 6, 1944, and are buried at a cemetery in Normandy.

On June 14, 2004, MSNBC.com posted a story from BET documenting the experiences of some African-American veterans who served in World War II, including from some who served at Normandy.

Buchanan's remark also ignored the contributions of other non-whites who served in World War II, including Hispanics, Asian-Americans, and Native Americans.

From the July 16 edition of MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show:

BUCHANAN: Well, I think I would vote "no" on Sonia Sotomayor, the same way I would've voted "no" on Harriet Miers; and I said so the first day she was nominated. I don't think Judge Sotomayor is qualified for the United States Supreme Court. She has not shown any great intellect here or any great depth of knowledge of the Constitution. She's never written anything that I've read in terms of a law review article or a major book or something like that on the law.

And I do believe she's an affirmative action appointment by the president of the United States. He eliminated everyone but four women and then he picked the Hispanic. So I think this is an affirmative action appointment and I would vote "no."

[...]

MADDOW: Why do you think it is that of the 110 Supreme Court justices we've had in this country, 108 of them have been white?

BUCHANAN: Well, I think white men were 100 percent of the people that wrote the Constitution, 100 percent of the people who signed the Declaration of Independence, 100 percent of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, probably close to 100 percent of the people who died at Normandy.

This has been a country built, basically, by white folks in this country who were 90 percent of the entire nation in 1960 when I was growing up, Rachel, and the other 10 percent were African-Americans who had been discriminated against -- that's why.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by epkklk851 (July 17, 2009 9:42 am ET)
      5  
      Isn't it so nice to see that Uncle Pat remains a nattering nabob of negativity after all these years? This is one of the most racist things I have ever heard someone in the "mainstream" utter. I wonder what klavern of the KKK would invite him to join, they usually don't take Catholics.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tracygav (July 17, 2009 9:47 am ET)
      6  
      He did say "anything that I've read". I guess if he hasn't read it, it doesn't exist. There's some Republican logic for ya.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by skiploader1111 (July 17, 2009 11:09 am ET)
        3  
        And we all know how hard Uncle Pat worked to try to find those law reviews Sotomayor wrote.

        Also, all it takes for a conservative automaton to believe she has no intellect is to hear another conservative say she has no intellect. This is the case even if they have already in the past heard evidence otherwise because they can just dismiss it as LIBRULTALK.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (July 17, 2009 9:51 am ET)
      3  
      Come on, Pat didn't mean this country was built "by" white people.

      He meant this country was built "for" white people.

      Right, Pat?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (July 17, 2009 11:09 am ET)
        5  
        From the slaves taken from Africa to the Chinese workers exploited to build the railroads, the racist Caucasians (pink people) used minorities to build a country exclusively for them. Now things have changed, but only old racists like Buchanan haven't changed.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by progressiveright (July 17, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
          1  
          I hate to say this because I an a white man but we (whites) have taken advantage and used every other ethnicity at the same time making them less than equal. This is a sin and an affront to the Spirit of the United States. The Decleration of Independance says "all men are created equal" but the US have never lived up to this and you are a traitor if you want us to live up to it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (July 17, 2009 9:58 am ET)
      4  
      And almost 100% of the Union troops killed at the Fort Pillow Massacre by the Confederates were African-American. This, of course, was after the Union Army permitted Black men to serve in combat.

      Maybe Mr. Buchanan needs to see the movie Glory...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (July 17, 2009 10:01 am ET)
      5  
      Mr. Buchanan, I strongly urge you to build a time machine and travel back to the 1950s. Direct all your efforts towards this end, and do not despair until you have succeeded or perished in the attempt. You have no place in the 21st century, you have little if anything relevant to say, and you are clearly uncomfortable here. The good news is, if you work day and night on that time machine, it will prevent you from making a complete fool of yourself on national television.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (July 17, 2009 10:30 am ET)
      4  
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_African_Americans_in_the_American_Civil_War
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oki_mike (July 17, 2009 10:37 am ET)
      1  
      I'm disappointed MSNBC hired Pat Buchanan as their analyst. Fox News I would have understood.. I have no desire to watch Fox News nor do I intend to hear the same kind of crap from NSMBC.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by freddiethej (July 17, 2009 11:25 am ET)
      2  
      Uh, Pat. Are you forgetting about the millions of African Americans who built the South and much of the North? For free? The slaves?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mrzitro (July 17, 2009 11:31 am ET)
        8
      This is much to do about nothing. 1. This was aired on MSNBC. 2. This was aired on the Rachel Maddow show. How many people saw this misinformation? I only know about it because I'm just passing through this website.
      Also, the lead for this article is misleading, "Buchanan falsely suggests Sotomayor has "never written" law review articles". The lead should have been something like "Buchanan falsely suggests 100 percent of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg were white." More ink was spent refuting Buchanan's claim about the past than on his claim that he has never read Sotomayor's work.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 17, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
        3  
        I only know about it because I'm just passing through this website.
        Like crap through a goose. Just keep passing, and don't bother coming back until you are actually capable of learning.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 17, 2009 11:43 am ET)
      3  
      The qualifier "...that I've read." I could just as easily say 'Dostoyevski has never written anything that I've read' but it would be more accurate and intellectually honest to phrase is 'I've never read anything Dostoyevski has written.'
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mrzitro (July 17, 2009 11:55 am ET)
        1  
        Exactly right.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (July 17, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
           
        To even use and spell Dosto...is impressive enough for me.
        You could've used George Bush or someone like that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jamie6191 (July 17, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
      3  
      I think white men were... 100 percent of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg

      Fifty percent of whom died to keep dark-skinned people in chains. Is that sacrifice really an appropriate one to invoke here?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coldteablues19577325 (July 17, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
      1  
      Ermmmmmm, and if I remember my grade school history right, how about a fellow by the name of Crispus Attucks. Isn't he remembered as the first casualty of the Revolutionary War? Hmmmmmm, I believe he was a runaway slave turned sailor.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by right ON (July 17, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
      3 1
      I don't understand why anyone would bother with historical evidence to refute something like "this country was built by white folks" nonsense. My only response to that would be "So?". There is no point to try and logically present evidence to counter something so ridiculous as what Buchanan said. I would keep saying "So?', maybe the idiocy of such a statement would sink in eventually.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cannonball (July 17, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
           
        I agree, the proper response to Uncle Pat is, "Why does that matter?" Eventually, he'll have to shut up or say that is matters because white people matter more than all the rest of you. Does anyone think that then, finally, Pat would lose his job? Maybe if he simply called our President the "n" word? Would that do it? I'll give you odds he says it plenty in private.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 17, 2009 1:31 pm ET)
        2 2
        My only response to that would be "So?".
        But that's pretty much your response to every article MMfA puts up on the site.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by LarryE (July 17, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
           
        My only response to that would be "So?"

        I had much the same response, only stronger: more along the lines of "What the effing hey does that have to do with the question?"

        Except, that is, to confirm the long-standing existence of racism in the country.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by joancholmes (July 18, 2009 8:38 am ET)
           
        Right on. This is the response I use when people tell me that President Obama is a Muslim. "So?"
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lute (July 17, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
         
      Even if Uncle Pat was right, and for the moment let us suppose he was--What was it all those white men died for?

      I don't believe it was so he could spout off about how fearful he was that whites are losing their pre-eminent place in the American power structure.--

      Nope. Them boys died because they believed there was something worth dying for--

      We don't live in a perfect republic, but it is a perfectible one, one in which freedom and equality and opportunity are constantly being expanded and evolved to fit the needs of change. None of us, Uncle Pat, are going to get the America we want, and if someone should, well then, the Founders have fallen by the wayside, and America is at an end.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by brendamayer (July 17, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
         
      Oh. My. God.

      That is one scary man.

      Heh. I loved how flustered he got regarding his own grades. Heh.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sjaengrs (July 17, 2009 7:05 pm ET)
         
      Buchanan's knowledge of history is patheticly slim:

      Who built the cross continental railway? Not white men.

      on CHINESE LABOR:
      "The greater portion of the laborers employed by us are Chinese, who constitute a large element in the population of California. Without them it would be impossible to complete the western portion of this great national enterprrise, within the time required by the Acts of Congress."

      LELAND STANFORD, Pres't C. P. R. R. Co., October 10th, 1865.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TadekKorn (July 18, 2009 3:48 am ET)
         
      I heard Pat on Rachel's show. The man is an unrepentant bigot. He thinks like a bigot, speaks like a bigot and he has a bigot's slant on history, i.e., he's ignorant. I've never quite understood what contribution he makes to MSNBC. Is it a need to balance truth with lies, intelligence with stupidity? We already have a network devoted to the latter. Is somebody at MSNBC really interested in out-foxing FOX?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Dr P (July 18, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
           
        So all those Native Americans and Mexican Vaqueros scattered throughout the Southwest didn't figure in that 10%, huh, Pat? Or is it just that all those family members of mine( who probably were there long before your family touched shore,making who a wetback?) were the anonymous unwashed masses that just don't count in American history.What a maroon."If I didn't see it it didn't exist".Sheesh.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mrzitro (July 19, 2009 11:07 pm ET)
           
        True & what is PBS's reasoning? Pat is on The McLaughlin Group also.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Philosimphy (July 18, 2009 11:23 am ET)
         
      "This has been a country built, basically, by white folks in this country."

      This is most disgusting. Even if you disregard the comments about whether or not non-whites died in the wars he mentioned, he completely discounts every single other achievement non-whites have ever contributed. Those achievements are mind-boggling - everything from slavery enabling the textile industries to "the heathen chinee" who built the railroads to the migrant farm workers who still put food on all of our tables today - This country would never have survived without these groups of people.

      What a pig this man is.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.