About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

As Dobbs digs in, CNN rebuts, ridicules, distances itself from birth certificate claims

July 22, 2009 3:57 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: In the wake of Lou Dobbs' repeated claims that President Obama needs to "produce a birth certificate" and that Obama's birth certificate posted online has "some issues," several of Dobbs' CNN colleagues as well as other media figures have debunked Obama birth certificate theories.

34 Comments

In the wake of Lou Dobbs' repeated claims on the July 15 edition of his radio show that President Obama needs to "produce a birth certificate" and that Obama's birth certificate posted online has "some issues," several of Dobbs' CNN colleagues as well as other members of the media have debunked Obama birth certificate theories, often ridiculing those who embrace such theories as "nut jobs" who advance "ludicrous" claims that are "more conspiratorial than factual." Indeed, according to the Los Angeles Times, CNN distanced itself from Dobbs' comments. Reporter James Rainey wrote: "[O]ne CNN employee reminded me several times that Dobbs' most pointed assertions were made on his radio program, which is unconnected to CNN."

Nonetheless, Dobbs has continued to repeat the "birther" claims on both CNN and his radio show, stating on the July 20 edition of his CNN program that the birth certificate questions offered by "passionate supporters" "won't go away because they haven't been dealt with, it seems possible to, straightforwardly and quickly," and saying on the July 21 edition of his CNN show, "We had people, including reporters from the LA Times, calling up because I referred to this. ... Instead of calling the White House to ask why they didn't do it, they're calling me to ask why I said I don't know what the reality is. No one does." Additionally, on the July 21 edition of his radio show, Dobbs criticized "certain quarters of the national liberal media that are just absolutely trying to knock down the issue of President Obama's birth certificate," stating that they are "focused on being subservient and servile to this presidency rather than being inquisitive and doing their jobs with, you know, the White House."

CNN hosts, personalities, and guests who have debunked birth certificate claims or criticized their adherents since July 15 include the following:

  • On the July 17 edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight, guest host Kitty Pilgrim said that CNN "found no basis" for the birth certificate claims and cited "overwhelming evidence that proves that his birth certificate is real, and that he was born in Honolulu," including Obama's birth certificate posted online by FactCheck.org.
  • Later on the July 17 Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN contributor Errol Louis stated of the theory's proponents, "I think what we have here is a case where under the guise of saying, well, we can't trust whether or not he should be president because we don't have the evidence, it's actually the reverse. These are folks -- and there are a number of them, and some of them are raising money, like WorldNetDaily, which is as far as I'm concerned, running a scam, where they're selling all kinds of bumper stickers and stuff like that." Louis later said "They're raising legal fees from across the country and the reality is they don't accept -- they don't accept that the president is the president and, therefore, they work backward and there will never be enough proof to satisfy them."
  • Also on the July 17 Lou Dobbs Tonight, The Daily Beast's John Avlon told Pilgrim, "You've offered a mountain of evidence in addition to two birth announcements. That's a pretty deep conspiracy." He also stated, "What we have here is Obama derangement syndrome. This is pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism" and later said to Alan Keyes and Orly Taitz, who advocate birth certificate theories, "You guys are nuts."
  • On the July 21 edition of CNN Newsroom, host Rick Sanchez held up a printed copy of Obama's birth certificate and then said, "To a large and vocal group of Americans, this paper that I just showed you might as well be bathroom tissue. Factual? Maybe. Enough to stop the speculation? Absolutely not." Sanchez also stated, "There's something strange about even having to do this story. So for those of you who get this, please, we apologize. But it's gotten to the point where there are so many people in this country who are believing this that it needs to be addressed." He later added: "[W]e certainly hope that there are people out there who do their own fact-checking, see for themselves what's on the record, and see that this seems to be more conspiratorial than factual."
  • On the July 21 edition of Larry King Live, CNN political contributor James Carville said of those who don't believe Obama is a natural-born American citizen: "These people are poor -- these poor pathetic people are believing stuff, just like -- just like [Liz] Cheney tonight. She refuses to say this is ludicrous, because she actually wants to encourage these people to believe this. It's just a simple thing. This is a nutty thing. There's nothing to this. I disagree with this president's policies."
  • In a July 22 column published on CNN.com, CNN contributor Roland S. Martin stated, "The nut jobs that continue to promote this story are wacky, right-wing radio and TV talk shows hosts and no-credibility bloggers. They have latched onto this story like bloodsucking leeches, and actually want us to believe this story has legs." He added:

What cracks me up is that in order to justify their loony beliefs, they say, "The president could just end this once and for all by producing the birth certificate."

Do you actually believe these wackos will stop there? They will then accuse the president of doctoring the document and ordering up the state of Hawaii and federal officials to create the birth certificate.

As Media Matters for America noted, prior to his July 15 radio program, Dobbs' CNN colleagues called the "birthers'" claims "total bull" and "a whack-job project," and characterized those who make such claims as "conspiracy theorists" who wear "tin foil hat[s]."

CNN personalities and guests were not alone in recent days in debunking the birth certificate theories and ridiculing those who give them credence:

  • On the July 21 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, during an interview with Rep. John Campbell (R-CA), who has co-sponsored a bill requiring future presidents to produce their birth certificates, host Chris Matthews asked, "What is going on that so many Americans doubt the obvious, that Barack Obama is a citizen, to the point that you felt it necessary to co-sponsor this crazy proposal?" He also said, "You're verifying the paranoia out there. You're saying to the people, you're right. That's a reasonable question, whether he's a citizen or not." Matthews also accused Campbell of "playing to the crazies" and "feeding the wacko wing" of the Republican Party.
  • On the July 21 edition of her MSNBC program, Rachel Maddow stated that Dobbs "is using the platform of his CNN show to advance the birther conspiracy." She later added, "I mean, one of the things I love about American politics and Americans in general is that we are enthusiastic about conspiracy theories. I find it entertaining. But the sort of the holy grail is to, you know, make CNN, to make the mainstream media to be talked about as if you've got some sort of credible idea."
  • In his July 22 Times article, Rainey quoted Brooks Jackson, director of Annenberg Political Fact Check, who "worked at the cable outlet for more than 20 years," stating of Dobbs' claims, "CNN should be ashamed of itself for putting some of that stuff on the air."
  • On the July 22 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, co-host Joe Scarborough cited evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii and said of the "conspiracy theorists" who say otherwise: "Now that is not enough for these people. They would rather be like sea lions barking at waves. They would rather, instead of trying to actually figure out what is happening to their country -- the terrible things that are happening economically to their country -- they embrace conspiracy theories. And they make themselves just look like cartoon characters." Scarborough also compared birth certificate conspiracy theorists to people who believe "the United States government blew up its own buildings and killed its own people on September 11" and believe that we "never landed on the moon."
  • On the July 22 edition of MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Reports, Matthews referred to the "birthers" as "full-mooners," while host Andrea Mitchell stated that they are "totally nuts."

From the July 21 edition of CNN Newsroom:

SANCHEZ: I want to show you something, all right? Let's get started with this right here. You get this, Robert? Take a look at this right here. See this? Can you shoot this right there? You got it, Robert? All right, this is a printout from the state of Hawaii. It's a certification of live birth. Child's name: Barack Hussein Obama II. See it right there? Can you read that?

All right. Down, lower. And as you go across, you see he was born 7:24 p.m. There it says the island of birth, Oahu. There it says when he was born, August 1961. His parents: his mother is a Caucasian, his father is Barack Hussein Obama, who is an African. All right, there's all the information. This is a reprint of his birth certificate, or as it says here, certificate of birth.

To a large and vocal group of Americans, this paper that I just showed you might as well be bathroom tissue. Factual? Maybe. Enough to stop the speculation? Absolutely not.

This completely unfounded story -- let me repeat -- this completely unfounded story continues to get so much play in certain media that it's led to a congressman's town hall meeting actually getting hijacked.

[...]

SANCHEZ: There's something strange about even having to do this story. So for those of you who get this, please, we apologize. But it's gotten to the point where there are so many people in this country who are believing this that it needs to be addressed.

[...]

SANCHEZ: Do you know what I could show you that could -- it would seem to me that it would put this to bed, right here and now on CNN.

Go down even -- Chris, are you in the control room? Go. Keep going, keep going, keep going, keep going, keep going, keep -- there. Stop. See that right there? This is the newspaper in Hawaii back in 1961. This is a birth announcement printed in that newspaper.

"Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama" -- this is part of the announcement saying that a young boy was born, right? Now, what'd you say, Angie? I'm sorry. So, there it is. This is interesting, because if you're saying -- if somebody out there is saying that Barack Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, then his grandparents would have had to have faked this, knowing that some day he was gonna be president, and that they would have to put this in there, so in the future he could come back and say, look, he was born in Hawaii but he wasn't really born in Hawaii.

I mean, that's kind of convincing, isn't it?

BEN FERGUSON (radio host) No, Rick, look, I understand exactly where you're coming from.

But you know in the media as well as anybody else, that when stories take on a life of their own, whether it be a product that somebody's claimed had something in it that wasn't in there, damage control is everything.

And if this man -- he's not afraid of doing press conferences. Lord knows we all know that. So, I mean, why -- I mean, if he can do all the press conferences he does, why not put it to bed in one moment on national TV?

SANCHEZ: Here's another chance to go on TV. He's gonna do it Wednesday.

Viveca, to that, you say what? Maybe he should. Should -- does he need to do a little more proving here?

VIVECA NOVAK (FactCheck.org deputy director): I do think that it -- he may be thinking it's a little unpresidential for him to be coming out at this point showing his birth certificate.

SANCHEZ: Yeah.

NOVAK: I don't know if there is a light way to do it. But, the fact that he's having to do it all is, to us at FactCheck, a bit insane. We don't know quite what to make of it ourselves.

FERGUSON: Hey, Rick, there's always the White House Correspondents' Dinner. There's a good night for it.

SANCHEZ: They'd still wonder. You know. There'd still be those people out there: "Nah, not convinced."

You know, it really is -- it's funny, but it's not so funny. I mean, it's a part of the national conversation. And we certainly hope that there are people out there who do their own fact-checking, see for themselves what's on the record, and see that this seems to be more conspiratorial than factual.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (July 22, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
      3  
      Good point, Rick. There will always be nuts who'll believe what they want to believe, in spite of proof to the contrary.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by big al (July 23, 2009 11:22 am ET)
        2  
        The reason Obama is not eligible to be president is not because he was not born in Hawaii. He was. The real reason is that Hawaii is not part of the United States. OK Hawaii - prove that you are part of the United States.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 22, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
      5  
      Hey Ferguson, Obama doesn't owe you or anyone else ANYTHING relating to this issue. It's not his problem that there are stupid worthless racist idiots who are using this manufactured controversy as a cover for their insane outrage over an African-American being President.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HopeNovak (July 22, 2009 5:20 pm ET)
      2  
      Racism disguised as concern for the American people is beyond appalling. And I still don't see how they can explain the newspaper announcement.
      The only explanation I've heard, that makes as much sense as the birthers, is that this proves that Obama truly is the Messiah. Because, when born in Kenya, and only minutes old, he conveyed to his parents that they needed to perpetrate the lie that he was born in America. So via a miracle he created the false announcements and certificates. Proving once and for all he is the Messiah... Like I said it makes as much sense.LOL
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Meremark (July 22, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
      2  
      The co-hosts and co-workers of Dobbs distancing themselves from him DOESN'T MAKE a DIFFERENCE.

      The only thing that matters in the media is SPONSORS DISTANCING themselves from Dobbs, and SUBSCRIBERS QUITTING pay (cable) TV.

      BOYCOTT Pay TV.

      That is how to bankrupt the ba$tard$ and smash the talking heads.

      Watch TV on your 'internets' and DVDs. The revolution will be OFF-ing television.


      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (July 22, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
           
        I do not think 'boycott sponsors' programs work.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (July 22, 2009 10:10 pm ET)
             
          What I do not understand is, how is Dobbs helping CNN make money? He just about ticks everyone off (D, R, I). He has no original thought, he condescendingly puts down his own guests.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (July 22, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
      4  
      Here’s the issue as I see it:

      "Where is his birth certificate?” the Birthers cry.

      It’s online.

      “That’s a forgery!” they cry louder.

      But the state of Hawaii assures us it’s real.

      “Hawaii is covering something up!!” the Birthers cry insanely loud.

      What proof do you need?

      “We want sworn affidavits from doctors and nurses who attended the birth!” the Birthers blather through rabid foamy lips.

      But that was almost 50 years ago. Those people are dead or cannot recall due to senility or Alzheimer’s.

      “CONSPIRACY!” the Birthers scream at the top of their lungs, spewing the air with foam like a ruptured can of shaving cream.

      Frank Burns of M*A*S*H said it best: “Do you have any papers to prove these are your papers?” (thanks to a fellow MMFA poster)

      The conundrum is this: no matter what proof you offer, the Birthers will reject it. Why? Because it’s not about Obama’s place of birth. It’s about his skin color. They don’t give a f@ rt in a canyon where he was born. They care that he’s BLACK.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (July 22, 2009 11:33 pm ET)
        1  
        Love the Frank Burns quote!

        The follow up Catch-22 is "The papers that prove these are your papers must be forgeries!"
        Report Abuse
    • Author by big al (July 22, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
         
      Supposedly liberal talk show Lynn Samuels on Sirius Left is one of those radical PUMAs who loves Hillary and hates Obama. She's completely into this birther thing as well. Most of the other progessive talk show hosts have some degree of reasonable criticism of The President but this woman is no better than any of the filthy right-wingers. MMA should focus on her as well. Please contact Sirius and hopefully we can get her off of Sirius Left.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (July 22, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
         
      These people are just bitter, nasty Republicans (Birthers) who just don't want to accept that President Obama was "ELECTED" fairly and squarely by the majority of Americans in the November 2008 Presidential Election - period. Just shameful, shameful, shameful.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (July 22, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
        1  
        Yeah, we need a President who's chosen by the Supreme Court.

        Ain't that somewhere in the Konstitution?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (July 22, 2009 11:34 pm ET)
             
          Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Obama. Isn't that proof Obama's an American?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jbraskin4786 (July 23, 2009 10:57 am ET)
             
          Didn't we have that eight years ago?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (July 22, 2009 6:57 pm ET)
         
      I don't understand why no one is talking to Neil Ambercrombie. the congressman from Hawaii.
      He knew Obama's parents in college and was friends with them.
      I recall him mentioning he saw Obama a few days after he was born.
      This man is an eye witness of sorts and he is in the congress.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by catfish1968 (July 22, 2009 7:49 pm ET)
           
        he's too busy running for governor and selling out to developers.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (July 22, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
      1  
      "This is pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism"

      I think this line pretty much says it all. It covers the disappointed Repubs, crazy people, rascists, and the generally mis-informed.

      Kind of like the old lady at the McCain town hall.
      "I don't trust him, we know he is an A-rab"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (July 22, 2009 10:08 pm ET)
        4  
        I really believe that Barak HUSSAINEY O'Bama was born on Pluto, that now discredited planet (that's another story right there) AND I also proved, beyond any doubt, that exactly 976 angels can dance on the head of a pin.
        Hey, I got PICTURES! And, listen up, folks, let's not let that story die about his bein' a A-rab. That socialist pink-o is gonna drag us down the path to a GODLESS GAY agenda, you mark my words. What we need in this country is another Inquisition to fry anybody that even questions the sanctity of our "free-market" system. You know that he is actually married to a BLACK woman? What's NEXT?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The Lonewacko Blog (July 23, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
        1
      Oddly enough, MMFA's round-up doesn't mention that CNN's Kitty Pilgrim lied when she said (transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0907/17/ldt.01.html):

      The Republican governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, on record, she says Obama was indeed born in her state...

      Can anyone find anything at all that backs up that statement?

      I'm going to reiterate what I said at the link: Pilgrim is a liar.

      Now, instead of posting yet another content-free insult, you can actually do CNN a good turn - and make me look bad - by finding any form of valid documentation - i.e., a clear statement directly from HI's governor - that matches CNN's claim.

      Note: I'm not talking about hearsay or a distorted AP report. I mean, find the actual original documentation of HI's gov. "validating" BHO's cert as CNN claimed. That must be an actual original quote from HI's gov in which she said anything like that.

      Note: The 10/31 statement from the HI DOH doesn't qualify, since it's not from HI's governor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Scotty Johnson (July 23, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
           
        you can actually do CNN a good turn - and make me look bad
        That would just be piling on. You've done a good job of it yourself.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 24, 2009 9:50 pm ET)
           
        WHAT? Do you mean you dont GET how bad you make yourself look? Dude, you are a nutbag and have been taken apart with your idiotic posts. Every one of them has been thoroughly debunked. Not a single point you have made has survived. You need to increase your medication
        Report Abuse
    • Author by webprogrammer (July 23, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
      2  
      I've read story after story and I have yet to hear birthers even try to address the birth announcements. When someone brings it up, they won't even talk about it. I suspect they know perfectly well the only way they can get around that one is by invoking space aliens or time machines or Satan or something, and even they understand that boat isn't going to float. So instead they just pretend that those announcements were referring to a different Barack Hussein Obama II who just happened to be born in Hawaii on the same day the President was born in Kenya and who just happened to have parents with the same names. And the cool part is they don't even have to prove that there are two Barack Hussein Obama's born on the same day, everyone else has to prove to their satisfaction that there aren't.

      I looked forward to Obama ascending to the White House because I thought it would be entertaining to see conservative heads explode as they watch their worst nightmare come true. And it has been entertaining. But I have to admit that I didn't realize they were going to snap. I knew their little rubber bands were wound pretty tight after 2006, but I didn't understand how close to the edge they were. It wouldn't have stopped me from voting for him in the primary and the general though. Maybe now they can finally get the mental health care their insurance companies have evidently been denying. You know how they are about pre-existing conditions.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The Lonewacko Blog (July 23, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
          2
        From my comment at mediamatters.org/columns/200907230005#529507

        4. Neither announcement listed a birth place or hospital, and no one has ever provided proof that such announcements could have only come from the birth hospital... Why isn't MMFA mentioning that the possibility that the announcements were planted by BHO's grandparents in expectation of a custody battle? That doesn't mean they did that. However, isn't MMFA misleading you when they only state one outrageous possibility rather than stating other more reasonable possibilities? Is MMFA dumb, or do they think you are?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jcalton (July 23, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
          3  
          If you want to get into more reasonable possibilities, then I'd go with Occam's Razor, because the simplest explanation requires the fewest assumptions, namely that all evidence, physical, circumstancial, and anecdotal are what they appear to be:

          Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, when he says he was, when his parents say he was, when his grandparents said he was, when the governor says he was, when the state health department says he was, when the hospital says he was, when his OBGYN said he was, when two local newspapers say he was, and when ALL mainstream media say he was.

          The birther conspiracy requires you to believe that each and every piece of evidence is fraudulent, and was made fraudulent from a larger conspiracy by his parents, grandparents, the state of hawaii, doctors and hospitals, etc.

          Which assumption is more "reasonable"?

          I give you credit for proposing the custody theory. That is about 1,000 times more believable than that this was all planned from the moment of his birth (conception?) to make him president 47 years later.
          It still requires a LOT of assumptions and no evidence to support the theory, making it completely unreasonable. But at least it's a valid hypothesis.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Scotty Johnson (July 23, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
          1  
          Why isn't MMFA mentioning that the possibility that the announcements were planted by BHO's grandparents in expectation of a custody battle?
          ..because A) That's nutty and B) There's no evidence to suggest it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (July 23, 2009 12:57 pm ET)
      1 4
      This is getting comical to watch.

      Health Care is tanking so badly and St. Barack was such an embarassment last night that MMFA is focusing on this birth certificate foolishness because their heroes on the left have been exposed as such frauds and incompetents on health care that MMFA would further embarass their friends by covering it.

      Similar CNN...nobody outside the whacked-out extreme right has this birthcert. on tis radar screen, but it is being used by MMFA and CNN to divert attention from the collapse of health care.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IowaDem (July 23, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
        1  
        Your an embarassment and a troll with your "St, Barak" crap and the completely divorced from reality statement that Health Care is "tanking" (btw, what is the obsession with the word tank, as in "the press is in the tank" or "Obama's popularity is tanking", etc etc. Is it the right-wings equally frightening obssession with all things war and violence). Anyway, MMFA isn't a "news" organization. It is not here to report news, if you'd bother to read its mission statement, it is here to highlight conservative misinformation in the media. So why would they focus on Barak's fact-filled, informative, reality-based discussion of the need for action on Health Care? Thanks for stopping by, tho, Mr. Cheney.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (July 24, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
             
          Its the repitition. They arent bright enough to think so its all about the repitition
          Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 24, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
           
        Yes it is comical. I love to laugh at people as stupid as you. Spewing their derisive nicknames like Rush has trained you to. The birthers are nuts. People like you are just stupid. Throwing petulant tantrums because the American people woke up and decided that rightwing morons like YOU are nothing less than catastrophic when we let you run things.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jcalton (July 23, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
         
      I just want to keep clarifying, this is from Dobbs' radio show, not his TV show.

      Dobbs is wrong, deluded, gullible, (maybe unknowingly even a racist) and/or dumb, but give him credit for not being dumb enough to try this on CNN TV.

      Does anybody even listen to Dobbs' radio show?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (July 24, 2009 4:39 am ET)
         
      i think sanchez put it well when he said, "it's funny, but it's not so funny." i think the people that make the claims are funny, but the actual issue is not.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Pedestrian (July 25, 2009 5:28 am ET)
         
      Good thing we don't have a very free press, eh?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.