About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN chief Klein misrepresents birther coverage to defend Dobbs

July 29, 2009 5:06 pm ET — 26 Comments

On July 28, CNN president Jonathan Klein reportedly defended Lou Dobbs' coverage of conspiracy theories about President Obama's birth certificate by falsely characterizing Dobbs' coverage as being limited to asking why some people continue to doubt Obama's citizenship. In fact, Dobbs has gone far beyond reporting on other people's conspiracy theories; he has repeatedly used discredited arguments to cast doubt on the adequacy of the birth certificate Obama has provided.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Klein falsely claimed Dobbs has simply asked, "Why do some people doubt [Obama's citizenship] still?"

From a transcript of Klein's comments posted by the Los Angeles Times:

Q: If Dobbs wanted to explore whether the British had won the Revolutionary War, would that be a legitimate topic?

KLEIN: It would not be legitimate for Lou or anyone else at CNN to explore whether Barack Obama is an American citizen. That's why he hasn't done that. And I think the people who are making noise about that have to look at closely what the discussions have been. It's all about the phenomenon of doubters.

[...]

Q: But if he goes on his radio show and contradicts your reporting and then raises the same issue on the air, isn't there some need for somebody to balance that?

KLEIN: What he does on the radio is separate and apart from what he does on our air. On our air, he has said very clearly and repeatedly that Barack Obama is an American citizen. Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. Of that there is no doubt. He must have said it 10 times the last time he did the story. So he couldn't be clearer about that. Now, a couple of times he's hosted panel discussions about this phenomenon: Why do some people doubt it still? That's what those discussions are about. There's a real distinction. Does that make sense? [Los Angeles Times; 7/28/09]

Memo to Klein: Dobbs has repeatedly questioned adequacy of Obama's birth certificate

Dobbs has gone beyond simply asking why there are still doubters. Contrary to Klein's suggestion that Dobbs' birther coverage is limited to discussions about why "some people doubt" Obama's birth certificate and citizenship, on his syndicated radio and CNN television programs, Dobbs has repeatedly questioned the adequacy of the birth certificate Obama released and has demanded Obama "provide the long-form birth certificate."

Klein's distinction between Dobbs' CNN and radio commentary is meaningless. Dobbs regularly uses his radio broadcasts to promote his TV show and vice-versa, including while demanding Obama "provide the long-form birth certificate." On July 28 on CNN, Dobbs said: "Well, I've repeatedly stated that President Obama is a citizen of the United States. My question simply: Why not provide the long-form birth certificate and end all of the discussion. Well, to hear my thoughts on all of this, join me on the radio Monday through Friday for The Lou Dobbs Show." [Lou Dobbs Tonight; 7/28/09]

Dobbs has claimed birth certificate provided by Obama is not "the real document." On July 15 on CNN, Dobbs cast doubt on the adequacy of the birth certificate posted by FactCheck.org, saying: "President Obama was born in Hawaii, according to state officials, and copies of his certification of birth -- FactCheck.org, investigating those circumstances prior to the election, and they have a copy of what they say is the original birth certificate posted on their website. It is, in fact, the so-called short form, not the original document. It is really a document saying that the state of Hawaii has the real document in its possession." [Lou Dobbs Tonight; 7/15/09]

Dobbs has suggested it isn't really a "birth certificate." On July 23 on CNN, Dobbs further stated of the birth certificate posted by FactCheck.org: "[T]here's no reference there to the attending physician. There's no reference there to the hospital in which he was born. It is a certificate that refers to the fact that another certificate exists." When CNN contributor Roland Martin asked: "Is it an official state document?" Dobbs replied: "It is a document that says there's another document. ... A copy of his birth certificate would have the doctor, the hospital that he was born in, correct? And this is the -- and, by the way, this is just what people are concerned about." [Lou Dobbs Tonight; 7/23/09]

Dobbs has suggested it is not "the real deal." On the July 15 broadcast of his radio show, Dobbs claimed that a "long-form" birth certificate -- rather than the document Obama has provided -- is "the real deal," asking: "What do you think? Is President Obama -- should he produce his birth certificate -- the long form, the real deal? Should he be a little more forthcoming?" [The Lou Dobbs Show; 7/15/09]

Dobbs has claimed it is "peculiar" and has "some issues." Dobbs also stated on his July 15 radio show: "[T]his can be dismissed with one -- the production of one simple little document, and that's a birth certificate. It's extraordinary." He later said: "I've seen a lot of peculiar things that turned out to be just as true as they can be. And things that seemed as true as they ought to be were the phoniest son-of-a-guns in the world, so we'll find out." He added: "But this is a peculiar little document, this certification of life birth that everyone is purporting to validate the president. I think there's some issues with this. I mean, it's peculiar." [The Lou Dobbs Show; 7/15/09]

Dobbs faulted media "trying to knock down" birth certificate "issue" and claimed "a certificate of live birth is not a birth certificate." On his July 21 radio show, Dobbs said that "there's certain quarters of the national liberal media that are just absolutely trying to knock down the issue of President Obama's birth certificate, his certificate of live birth. And it's funny because this is an issue that I get a lot of calls on from time to time and we -- what we talk about is the fact that a certificate of live birth is not a birth certificate. It isn't the original document." [The Lou Dobbs Show; 7/21/09]

Dobbs' claims that Obama's birth certificate is inadequate are false

Birth certificate Obama provided "meets all of the requirements ... for proving U.S. citizenship." Contrary to Dobbs' repeated assertions that the birth certificate Obama released is not the "real deal," FactCheck.org wrote: "FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate [provided by Obama]. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. ... The certificate has all the elements the State Department requires for proving citizenship to obtain a U.S. passport: 'your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.' " [FactCheck.org; 11/1/08]

Hawaii officials reject Dobbs' distinction between validity of "long" and "short" form birth certificates. PolitiFact.com reported that Hawaii officials say that the document provided by Obama "is considered a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii" and that "[c]alling it by other names" is, in PolitiFact's words, "just semantics":

When we spoke to a spokeswoman for the Hawaii Department of Health, she said too much was being made of the difference between the so-called "long" and "short" forms.

"They're just words," said spokeswoman Janice Okubo. "That (what was posted on the Internet) is considered a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii."

"There's only one form of birth certificate," she said, and it's been the same since the 1980s. Birth certificates evolve over the decades, she said, and there are no doubt differences between the way birth certificates looked when Obama was born and now.

"When you request a birth certificate, the one you get looks exactly like the one posted on his site," she said. "That's the birth certificate."

[...]

The Health Department says the "Certification of Live Birth" is Hawaii's version of a birth certificate. Calling it by other names -- Certificate of Live Birth, Certification of Live Birth -- is just semantics. [PolitiFact.com; 7/28/09]

Contrary to Klein's suggestion, Dobbs' birtherism continues on CNN

Klein suggested that Dobbs stopped using his CNN show to ask that Obama produce his birth certificate after Klein sent Dobbs' show an email on July 23 declaring the story seemingly "dead." From Klein's July 28 comments:

Q: But if he goes on his radio show and contradicts your reporting and then raises the same issue on the air, isn't there some need for somebody to balance that?

A: What he does on the radio is separate and apart from what he does on our air. On our air, he has said very clearly and repeatedly that Barack Obama is an American citizen. Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. Of that there is no doubt. He must have said it 10 times the last time he did the story. So he couldn't be clearer about that. Now, a couple of times he's hosted panel discussions about this phenomenon: Why do some people doubt it still? That's what those discussions are about. There's a real distinction. Does that make sense?

Q: But he also asks: Why haven't they produced the documents when they have, in fact, produced the documents?

A: That's why I sent that note the other day -- to clarify. We had our guys ask that question. It turns out, he can't. It's not up to him. It's not the president's choice. Lou has now stated that. What he then turns around and does on his radio show is not within our purview.

Even after Klein's email, Dobbs continued to suggest Obama should release birth certificate. On the same day that Klein sent the email to Dobbs' show, Dobbs asked Roland Martin on CNN: "When this could be dispelled so quickly, and -- and simply by producing [the birth certificate], why not do it?" [Lou Dobbs Tonight; 7/23/09]

Transcripts

From the Los Angeles Times transcript of the Q&A between reporters and Klein:

Q: If Dobbs wanted to explore whether the British had won the Revolutionary War, would that be a legitimate topic?

A: It would not be legitimate for Lou or anyone else at CNN to explore whether Barack Obama is an American citizen. That's why he hasn't done that. And I think the people who are making noise about that have to look at closely what the discussions have been. It's all about the phenomenon of doubters.

Q: Are you distinguishing from what he said on his radio show?

A: Oh, yes, absolutely. We have no control over what he says on his radio show. It's not a CNN radio program so he does what he does on the radio separate from what he does on our air. So we ask you and anyone writing about this, to look at what he says on CNN. It's the only thing we control.

Q: Are you concerned, though, that it will damage your credibility?

A: I hope not. All we can do is do great reporting about the facts on this and every other story that we cover.

Q: But if he goes on his radio show and contradicts your reporting and then raises the same issue on the air, isn't there some need for somebody to balance that?

A: What he does on the radio is separate and apart from what he does on our air. On our air, he has said very clearly and repeatedly that Barack Obama is an American citizen. Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. Of that there is no doubt. He must have said it 10 times the last time he did the story. So he couldn't be clearer about that. Now, a couple of times he's hosted panel discussions about this phenomenon: Why do some people doubt it still? That's what those discussions are about. There's a real distinction. Does that make sense?

Q: But he also asks: Why haven't they produced the documents when they have, in fact, produced the documents?

A: That's why I sent that note the other day -- to clarify. We had our guys ask that question. It turns out, he can't. It's not up to him. It's not the president's choice. Lou has now stated that. What he then turns around and does on his radio show is not within our purview.

Q: Is it a topic you'd rather see him drop at this point?

A: I would rather all of our leading journalists rely on their best judgments and instincts and our guidance about them. We believe in the editorial compass of all of our people. It's going to be different according to the individual. But that just makes us a more interesting and vibrant place. Lou is listening to a certain segment of the population all day long on his radio show so naturally that's going to inform some of the decisions that he makes. But, again, to be clear: He is not exploring the question of whether Barack Obama is an American citizen. That is settled. It is a dead issue as far as CNN is concerned.

From the July 28 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight:

DOBBS: New developments tonight in the controversy over the president's birth certificate. Yesterday, the director of the Hawaii Department of Health issued another statement that she had, in fact, seen Barack Obama's original, so-called long-form birth certificate on file with the department's office of vital records. That official repeated her opinion that the president was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. She made a similar statement last October.

There have been repeated requests from some of the president's skeptics about the release of his original birth certificate. Hawaii law, however, prevents the actual release of the document to a third party. CNN had previously reported that when Hawaii's vital records office went paperless in 2001 that the original paper documents were discarded.

That was incorrect. Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the Hawaii Department of Health said, in fact, that paper birth records have been retained in addition to the department's electronic records.

A left-wing group's liberal mainstream media have stepped up some attacks on me for reporting on the controversy over the president's birth certificate when I, in fact, I've stated many times that President Obama is a citizen of this country in my opinion. The Southern Poverty Law Center, for example, called on CNN to fire me for my even discussing the story. Coming to my defense last night: Bill O'Reilly.

[begin video clip]

RICHARD COHEN (Southern Poverty Law Center president and CEO): When's enough, Bill? When's enough, enough? I mean, this -- Lou's been doing this for years.

O'REILLY: It's never enough, enough in a freedom of speech society, Mr. Cohen. It's never enough to know. Freedom of speech --

COHEN: We're not --

O'REILLY: -- allows you to go over the -- up to the line, OK --

COHEN: Sure.

O'REILLY: -- without -- if Lou Dobbs was causing danger to someone then you would be legitimate in calling for his firing, but he's not.

But isn't this partially -- the Southern Poverty Law Center was so outraged about Mr. Dobbs and the illegal alien take that he came up with that isn't this a little payback? Aren't you guys paying him back for the illegal alien deal here?

COHEN: Well, I think we're calling him for his misstatements of fact like we've been doing for years. You know, your entire --

O'REILLY: So it's not just a birth certificate thing. This is illegal aliens and other stuff, too.

COHEN: Well, I wouldn't put it quite that way. I mean, Lou has been saying ridiculous things about undocumented persons.

[end video clip]

DOBBS: Undocumented persons -- well, I want to say, first of all, to Bill O'Reilly, thank you. I do want to point out Bill O'Reilly also kicked my rear end around a bit, disagreeing with me absolutely on the issue of whether or not, as I said, the president could solve all of this by just simply releasing his long form. He and I disagree on that, but I appreciate Bill O'Reilly being a standup guy.

And, apparently, I was a topic on another show on Fox News -- Geraldo Rivera attacking me for being wrong on illegal immigration, as well as the birth certificate controversy. How I could be wrong about that I don't know, because all I said is the president is a citizen, but it would be simple to make all this noise go away with just simply producing the long-form birth certificate. Ann Coulter came to my defense partially.

[begin video clip]

RIVERA: Dobbs has a new distinction as the principal prime-time advocate of the issue of whether or not Barack Obama is really a citizen of the United States. Ann Coulter, is this an issue?

COULTER: No, it isn't. And, by the way, Lou Dobbs is not a crank. He was absolutely right on illegal immigration. You were wrong, Geraldo.

RIVERA: He's a dope.

COULTER: However, he is wrong on this issue.

RIVERA: OK. Good.

[end video clip]

DOBBS: Well, I've repeatedly stated that President Obama is a citizen of the United States. My question simply: Why not provide the long-form birth certificate and end all of the discussion.

Well, to hear my thoughts on all of this, join me on the radio Monday through Friday for The Lou Dobbs Show.

[...]

DOBBS: Left-wing groups attack me for just mentioning the controversy over the president's birth certificate. I have said, straightforwardly, I believe the man's a citizen. That doesn't satisfy the left wing of this country, but I have some very able defenders. Again, I want to say thank you to Ann Coulter, to Bill O'Reilly.

We'll be back with our radio panel. Stay with us.

[...]

DOBBS: Next, the president -- well, he's raising the pressure for his health care plan, but he can't break the deadlock among members of his own party.

And some strong defense that I received after left-wing advocacy groups attacked me for simply saying the president is a citizen, but why not just show that long-form birth certificate?

We'll be right back.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 29, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
      4 1
      Hey, Klein...the toothpaste is out of the tube and you can't put it back no matter how hard you try. Dobbs has said what he has said...and you are simply trying to do damage control. You have a problem on your hands, Klein, because Lou Dobbs will forever be regarded as the chief cable promoter of the birther movement...and that turns people off.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rebopine (July 29, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
         
      Three things:

      1. Thank you Media Matters, when I started reading the transcript full of denials about Lou Dobb's past allegations I wanted to pull up every instance that is contraditory of Kliens comments, then I scolled down and saw that you did that already. Thanks for keeping me from tearing my hair out and for keeping them in check.

      2. Klein is only trying to protect himself and CNN, that's not suprising to me. What did suprise me were Lou Dobbb's comments from last nights show, he's clearly denying that he said things that are documented in print, audio and video recordings. He's a liar, plain and simple.

      3. It just shows how low he has sunk (Or, maybe he was already that low and I didn't notice before) that he is thanking Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter for backing him up. Really, if you need either of them to defend your honor, you have no honor left.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (July 29, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
      2  
      I love the defense. I also love that I saw Lobb jump right back on this dead horse last night. Ride'm you sick cowboy.

      If Dobbs stays on CNN news, realize CNN is no longer news but history as it loses what little dignity it has left.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (July 29, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
        3  
        If Dobbs stays on CNN news, realize CNN is no longer news but history as it loses what little dignity it has left

        And if Klein doesn't change directions real soon he will also be history. His current position is indefensible.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jshoema (July 30, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
             
          problem is, i think he will stay on.

          campbell brown bashed the stimulus bill and didn't get touched, even though she lied through her teeth
          Report Abuse
    • Author by right ON (July 29, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
      1  
      This is beginning to smell like either an orchestrated, or a freshly created, publicity stunt by Dobbs and CNN. Either way it's boring already. To Lou Dobbs; Enough.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by right ON (July 29, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
        4 1
        And I was going to add what's even more tedious is when these cable news networks start making the news about them and their on-air personalities. They may be wrapped up in their "stars", but most of us don't give a damn. This is why I watch none of them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (July 29, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
             
          You are entitled to your TV viewing options, but not to dismiss articles on MMFA by posting saying you are shrugging them off.
          If you want to shrug them off, just shrug to yourself. It would be helpful if you post what your conclusions are (birthers are nuts, or not nuts) and then shrug.
          You posting that you do not care does not help and only gives the impression that you are ok with the lunacy going around, but you shrug it off. It's still lunacy.
          And spawns posts by people like The Lonewacko Blog.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TadekKorn (July 30, 2009 2:28 am ET)
            1  
            My two cents worth: as long as lunacy limits itself to verbal expression, it is not illegal. But I can't help but be somewhat suspicious when Dobbs becomes an echo of Hannity. CNN has long been a competitor of FOX, and, apparently, a losing one. Is Jon Klein is priming CNN for a merger with FOX? In combination they might be able to claim some sort of dominance against MSNBC. It's hard to imagine that either CNN or FOX have the credibility they enjoyed in the early years of W's administration.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by The Lonewacko Blog (July 29, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
      1 8
      There are more misleading statements above than I want to discuss, but let me choose just two:

      1. The difference between what BHO has put on his site and the long-form should be obvious to anyone.

      2. The problems with FactCheck are briefly discussed here. See their name's link at that page for a longer discussion of all the problems. Note also that their main page on this topic has been lying to people since November 1, 2008. They claimed that HI had confirmed BHO was born there, when in fact HI did not do that until two days ago. If you disagree, compare what HI said two days ago to what they said on 10/31; see the last link for links to the two original statements.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 29, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
        7 1
        I didn't know Lou Dobbs posted here.

        And for the record, you're either insane or a troll or both.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (July 29, 2009 7:05 pm ET)
        2  
        There are more misleading statements above than I want to discuss, but let me choose just two:

        1. Your first one.

        2. Your second one.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by funnymanpants (July 29, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
        3  
        >>The difference between what BHO has put on his site and the long-form should be obvious to anyone.

        You really are confused, aren't you? No one has a copy of the long term certificate, because it doesn't even exist anymore. NBC did that story a few days ago. Did you miss that in your insanity?

        >>The problems with FactCheck are briefly discussed here.

        No, and no, and no. The website reads like the Enquirer, with a bunch of what if questions. In addition, it just links to itself without making any convincing argument.

        Janice Okubu, the director of health in Hawaii, has stated that the birth certificate Barack posted is legitimate, and that birth certificate states Obama was born in Honolulu. Did you have some higher or better authority that can dispute that fact which buries your case?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (July 30, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
           
        Lonewacko:

        Every time you post, you prove your own handle.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Koyaanisqatsi (July 30, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
           
        Let me guess, back during campaign time you wanted to see the long-form birth certificate of John McCain, right? And also too, you requested to see the papers of Winky McQuiterod from all five colleges she attended to get her four-year degree, is that correct?
        Were you worried about John kerry's birth certificate?
        Can you prove that G W Bush was not born of a jackal as his presidency suggests?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jshoema (July 30, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
           
        here is one problem with your statement. your using world net daily. a site whose mission is to promote this racist crap.

        second, you use the national review online as anouther source. a less loud version of WND.

        see the whole issue boils down to racisim.

        its quite simple, if this wasn't racist why is it that of 44 presidents elected, that only the most recent one, and the only black one is demanded to produce a birth certificate.

        and second. why is it no one questioned john mccain's citizenship. considering he was born on a naval base in panama. there is a better case that he isnt a natural born citizen than barack obama. well its simple cause mccain, like presidents elected up until now, where white.

        there is no defense for this birther nonsense. its racisim and thats all.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by oki_mike (July 31, 2009 10:52 pm ET)
           
        To Lonewacko what a great username you have.. You wear it so well.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by insaneloki20024664 (July 30, 2009 8:14 am ET)
        3
      What I do not understand is why Obama does not produce and show the original Birth Certificate given at birth? The one that looks like my birth certificate.

      Why, if the document he provided is the same as a birth certificate, do they have more than one form? they would not need more than one form for the same thing. The only reason to have two separate forms is one means one thing and the other means another thing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 30, 2009 8:43 am ET)
        1  
        There are different birth cirtificates. The one that you[r parents] get from the ospital and take home is not offical. It's purely sentimental. Just a souvenir. The official forms is filed with the public records. You don't get a copy of that unless you specifically request it.

        You'll find out the difference when (for example) you try to get a passport. My wife had the form her parents took home with her, the day she was born. No good. She had to get the official from from City Hall.

        As for the wole long form / short form, BC vs. CoLB... I'm no expert but that's all nonsesne. One doesn't exsist without the other, and what was posted on the web site is exactly what any of us would get if we requested a "copy of our BC."

        It's legit, and Dobbs should know better.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NG_Officer (July 30, 2009 8:57 am ET)
      1  
      I may be splitting hairs... but, Lou keeps saying that the "President is a citizen", but never has he said that BO is a natural born citizen therefore eligible to be President.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gmsingh (July 30, 2009 9:20 am ET)
      1  
      Sadly, "Mr. Independent" has developed a dependency for garbage journalism. He and Amy Winehouse need to spend some time in rehab.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newflorida (July 30, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
      1 1
      We are doing our Part. We have created Fireloudobbs.com to gather petitions to ask CNN to fire Lou Dobbs. Goal is to get 100000 Signatures.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jcalton (July 30, 2009 11:23 pm ET)
         
      I think the fact that Lou Dobbs demanded (essentially) that the president satisfy Lou Dobbs, when he got slammed on his own show the other day, makes it pretty clear that these aren't representations of "other" people's theories.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.