Malkin distorts Michelle Obama biography to attack her and her father as corrupt
In her new book, Culture of Corruption, conservative columnist Michelle Malkin claims that first lady Michelle Obama "was literally born into the Chicago political corruptocracy," suggesting that because her father was a volunteer precinct captain and held a city job, she was a party to cronyism and embraced the practice. In fact, the biography of Michelle Obama that Malkin cites to make this case actually argued that the first lady's experience in the "powerful political machine" of Richard J. Daley made her and her family "extremely cynical about politics and politicians" until they met "Barack [Obama], whose political career was pushed in part by a coalition of people who had grown up in opposition to Daley and whose goal was breaking the Machine."
Malkin asserts Michelle Obama was born into "Chicago political corruptocracy"
From Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies (Regnery Publishing, July 2009):
In the Chicago patronage culture that made Michelle Obama, the color that matters most is neither black nor white, it is green -- the color of money. Mrs. Obama was literally born into the Chicago political corruptocracy. Her father, Fraser Robinson, was a volunteer precinct caption for the Democrat Party [sic]. Washington Post writer Liza Mundy called him "an essential member of the powerful political machine run by [Richard J.] Daley, who, in addition to being mayor, was the chairman of the Cook County Democratic Central Committee, meaning he controlled both the government and the political party, and could use one to do the other's bidding." Former alderman Leon Despres bluntly told Mundy that it was "overwhelmingly likely" that Robinson's job at the city water department was a reward for his loyalty. "The water department, where Fraser Robinson worked, was a renowned repository of patronage jobs."
Why such little scrutiny of Michelle the Merciless (or "That Other Michelle," as she's known in my house) and her crony-aided rise to power? Like her husband, Mrs. Obama is quick to play the victim card when her ill-considered statements and her dealings come under scrutiny. I don't call her President Obama's bitter half for nothing. [Page 43]
Biography cited by Malkin actually reported that Michelle Obama disliked machine politics
Liza Mundy's Michelle: A Biography actually explains that "Chicago in the 1960s was almost certainly the source of her oft-expressed skepticism about politics." Contrary to Malkin's use of Mundy's book to suggest that Michelle Obama embraced the culture of the Daley machine, Mundy actually writes:
While there were many pleasures in Michelle's childhood -- bikes could be left on sidewalks and moms could stay home and children could roam more freely than they do now -- it's also indisputable that the Chicago she grew up in was not entirely hospitable to citizens like Fraser Robinson and his aspirations to move his family forward. Her dad and her community may well explain her own grounded and hard-working nature, as well as her commitment to her children, but Chicago in the 1960s was almost certainly the source of her oft-expressed skepticism about politics. It was not only a racist and highly segregated city, but one with a complex and ambiguous political system, a system that Fraser Robinson participated in, either because he enjoyed politics or because it was one of the few paths open to an ambitious black man. [Michelle: A Biography, Page 23]
Mundy argued that Robinsons were "extremely cynical about politics and politicians" until they met Obama. Mundy reported:
But it's also likely that for all the pride Michelle took in her father's professional dedication, she also drew a lesson about politics. Part of Michelle's skepticism about it comes form the version she saw up close as a little girl: how the system bought you and protected you, but also controlled you. "If you didn't do this, didn't behave in a certain way," says [Don] Rose [Chicago political consultant and historian of city government], "you could lose your pay, [the Machine could] demote you, fire you." People who underperformed in their political work were susceptible to being "vised," or summarily fired. That was politics in Chicago. "Some of [Michelle's] subconscious -- some of her disdain as to politics could have to do with how [her father] was treated, and what he had to go through," says Al Kindle, a political consultant who grew up on the South Side.
And that, Kindle says, is why the black community was ambivalent about patronage and about Daley: the Machine lifted you up -- got you services and perks -- at the same time that it kept you down. "It was clear that you didn't get access to certain services unless you were a friend to the power structure. That spigot could be cut off. As a young African American with a family, you had to think about that with a jaundiced eye. Just as it helped you, it restricted your choice." So it could be that Robinson's son and daughter developed a dislike for politics even as they developed a deep, deep love for him. "We as a family were extremely cynical about politics and politicians" is how Craig [Robinson, Michelle Obama's brother] puts it. That started to change when they met Barack, whose political career was pushed in part by a coalition of people who had grown up in opposition to Daley and whose goal was breaking the Machine. [Michelle: A Biography, Pages 30-31]
Malkin ignored biography's argument that Frank Robinson had little choice but to be politically active while holding a city job
A former Chicago alderman told Mundy: "[T]he majority of the people were [serving as precinct captains] because their jobs depended on it." Mundy reported:
As a precinct captain, you could expect, in return for this political policing, a city job. In fact, doing "volunteer" work was almost the only way you could get one. "To get a city job, you'd have to have some kind of recommendation from your ward committeeman," says Don Rose, describing a system in which it was crucial to have a recommender, somebody watching out for you -- your patron. Daley kept a file cabinet with a list of jobs in it and was said to know the names of everybody who held them.
[...]
"We had some volunteers but the majority of the people were [serving as precinct captains] because their jobs depended on it," says Cliff Kelley, a former South Side alderman who [...] was familiar with machine culture. Most of the time, Kelley says, a person's political activism, and the job he held, were inseparably linked. [Michelle: A Biography, Pages 28-29]
In '50s and '60s, city jobs "insulated" African Americans "from the capriciousness and racism of the open job market." Mundy reported:
A city job was particularly valuable to an African American in that it insulated him somewhat from the capriciousness and racism of the open job market. "This was in the fifties and early sixties. Before affirmative action, patronage was as close as you could get to affirmative action, and if you didn't get rich, at least it was a steady job," says Rose. [Michelle: A Biography, Pages 28-29]
Malkin attacks Fraser Robinson, doesn't note he had M.S. but worked every day for decades "without complaint"
Citing Mundy's book in attacking Fraser Robinson, Malkin ignored Mundy's reporting that Robinson worked every day for decades despite being "crippled by multiple sclerosis." Mundy described Fraser Robinson as a "vigorous man who was crippled by multiple sclerosis, a progressive disease that set in when he was just in his thirties." Mundy wrote that Fraser's "congenial presence defined the home" Michelle Obama grew up in, with his "unflinching work ethic, his deep commitment to family, his view that who you are is defined not only by how you behave in public but what you do in the shadows, when nobody is watching." [Michelle: A Biography, Page 22]. Mundy added that Michelle and Craig "describe what an inspiration it was to both of them, seeing Fraser Robinson get up to go to work every day, something that became increasingly difficult after his disease set in. Despite the fact that he needed a cane -- and, later, crutches and eventually a motorized cart -- he never stopped working." [Michelle: A Biography, Page 30]
Mundy notes that in describing her father's "premature death," Michelle Obama said, "He died on his way to work." Mundy wrote that Fraser Robinson "had recently been in the hospital for a kidney operation, and afterward died unexpectedly of complications," adding that Michelle Obama also said of his passing: "He wasn't feeling well, but he was going to get in that car and go." [Michelle: A Biography, Page 30]

















She made a name for herself writing a revisionist "history" book saying the internment of Japanese-Americans was all right, and that Muslims should be interned the same way.
Malkin is a racist, pure and simple.
I know you're trying to be ironic. It's just not working. For irony to be effective, it needs to actually be rooted in irony.
It's just that the most recent people folks like yourself like to talk about as being racist, aren't.
Examples. Obama. Sotomayor. And so on.
Wow, there's RULES for racism? Do you know where I can find the definitive rule book?
Anyway, IMO, Malkin is not so much a racist as she is a defender of white privilege.
When you are already at the bottom of the hole, stop digging...
As far as pointy goes, I think he secretly loves all of us, especially WZ and Harley. He's like a boy in school that pulls a girl's pigtails because he really likes her ;-0)
Why is it so difficult for some people to view life in anything other than black-and-white terms?
Now, when a minority does not sing the song you like to hear she is a racist. The only thing that has changed is her party affiliation. The double standards and the apologies for racist dems never stops here.
And again... So anything about affirmative action or anything of that sort isn't "racist". That's a very common charge from the right on these boards, so perhaps the argument against that is what you're thinking of. Or the argument that Obama is racist for saying that Crowly acted "stupidly". That's one person's specific actions. It's not that it's impossible for him to be racist, it's that the facts simply do not bear out the charge in any way.
I have seen the argument once or twice that black people can't be racist because they have no power. I've addressed that, explaining that would be systemic racism. So I haven't changed my tune on anything, and since I haven't seen the argument you're referring to very often at all, I have to think you're conflating two very different points.
You do show reason on this topic. I did not name names, but if it helps, The Col, Solon, Pearl, Onceyougobarak, easytorefutewingnuts, mary, harley, and vhw, to name just a very few..have all argued many times that a it is impossible for a minority to be racist.
You are generally pretty reasonable, but to claim that you have not read these people specifically, and many others generally claim on many different posts and threads that a minority simply can not be racist is not believable. All you have to do is examine virtually any of the Gates or Wright threads and you see it all over the place.
Like many conservatives, I am opposed to affirmative action. It is nothing more than legislated racism. But that is not my point here. It is interesting to note that one significant figure who has voiced concern over AA is the President himself. He, like many conservatives, has noted that these programs should shift away from race, and focus more on SEC status.
My point is what a crutch the racist label has become. Any time the dems dont like what a conservative has said or done, they label them a racist, while at the same time, declaring it is jut not possible for dems or minorities to be racist. It is laughable at best.
I've also disagreed with the argument that Dems can't be racist. I think I've seen that once. Liberals can't be racist by definition, because it's not consistent with the label itself.
You should also bear in mind that the philosophies are different. Conservatives tend to favor the status quo, less government power, free market rule, etc. Those things allow racism much more than affirmative action, federal discrimination laws and regulations, etc. So it's sort of naive to look at it as "if one side does it then the other side must too". There's very clearly a reason that there's more racism on one side than the other.
There's ttwo parts to this:
1) that liberals sling the word around irresponsibly.
and
2) that racism isn't significant.
Part 1) is arguable; part 2 is not, and to argue it is pernicious.
Two years ago I buried my best friend, a brilliant artist who was good enough to work for the major comic book companies, but who couldn't get local ad work because he was a black man married to a white woman. I, a scruffy looking whiteguy who tends to dress like a Bowery bum, was able toclear up account problems with his utilities in minutes thathewith his black face was unable to straighten out.
I have seen the snarling face of racism right in front of me, and felt its hot sour breath.
Yes, not every criticism of Barack Obama is racist, and we know that you guys will pick up whatever rock you have to hand: if it had been Hillary, we've got a pretty good idea what you'd have said. And sure, you'll call a war heroa coward, so you'll call a professor of Constitutional Law at one of the most prestigious law schools in the country a dope, You'll say anything at all.
And I'll even say that, knowing many Filipinos, I know that Malkin's hatred of the Japanese is shared by a huge number of them, and she probably learned from infancy. And there are big reasons for that hatred.
But saying that accusations of racism are just a ploy is an attempt to devalue the term, to make it meaningless. Just like shouting 'playing the race card.
You might not be racists for doing so, you just might be cynical opportunists who will use any rhetorical trick, libel or slander that's to hand.
But racism exists. And, whether you want to or not, you're doing its job.
(And isn't it amazing that the right, after 8 years of screaming about militant Islam as an existential threat, worse than the Commies and the Nazs combined, suddenly finds that welfare cheats and socialism is far more important? Where'd all that danger go?)
Malkin is shilling and whether she is prejudiced or not I don't know (although her bias against Japanese people does seem quite apparent)
At the time they were 78 and 80 and told me of their time in the camps. It was a powerful story of two people whose lives were disrupted when they were teens and who eventually reconciled their awful experience and still love America despite it.
And I would say that Michelle Malkin, whatever her heart really says, is a shameless shill who lies and dissembles for profit. Not very flattering.
Yes, of course racism exists. To suggest that I am "doing its job" as you say is insane. There are plenty of reasons to object to Obama and his policies. None of them have to do with race or racism.
Your sly attempt to go from racism exists to then saying that I and other conservatives are helping racism achieve its goal goes full circle. You begin trying to counter my point that liberals throw racism charges around to easily and then you do just that.
Yup, I purposely did in response to the lies the right told. And I made it pretty darned clear that was why I did it. Y'all can dish it out, but you can't take it is the lesson here.
Conservatives do allow racism to achieve its goal when they don't denounce it when it comes from heir colleagues,friends,political comrades,etc..When Republicans at a Palin campaign rally called for vilolence to Candidate Obama based on her "pals with terrorist " rhetoric ..she said nothing.When the danger of allowing this was behavior was likened to the George Wallace era ,the McCain campaign acted insulted.When racist commentary from Limbaugh,Beck,etc.,is not denounced by conservatives/republicans in powerful positions..they certainly enable that behavior to gain a measure acceptance by some.If Conservatives were so concerned about racism why do they rarely speakout about it when members of their party or partisan groups make one of their almost weekly racist comments or emails.You give it credence thru benign tolerance !!Any prominent Conservatives that criticized the POTUS's comments on the Gates matter comment on the Boston cop's racist email???I must have missed it!!
I have defended Wright before, simply because he's not a racist. Never have been shown any proof that he is, or was one. He's so racist, his church is open to all different people of all different colors. Man, that's a hard core racist right here.
Saying something bad about Jewish people isn't racist, since Judaism is a religion, not a particular race of people. Anyone can be Jewish.
I never really hear Republican alternatives to AA, which leads me to believe, you do not have any and that discrimination against minorities is not a problem.
Companies that refuse to hire qualified individuals will pay criminally, in the civil court system, and even more so from not hiring the best employees they can. That is fundamentally different then lowering law school or medically school admission standards based on race, or quota systems in hiring or promotions.
Hmmm... Outside of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which has always been a cornerstone of AA regarding hiring), what other federal laws would prevent discrimination in hiring against non-whites - assuming it was nullified?
With regards to AA, I think most people would agree that universities have a reasonable interest in admitting students from diverse backgrounds.
Secondly, you have not mentioned any laws that would replace the AA cornerstone Civil Rights Law of 1964. I would be interested in your response.
Assuming the CRA of 1964 would indeed be repealed, there does not appear to be an alternative basis for a non-white or female to sue for discrimination.
Lowering standards indeed. This from the party lead by a bunch of mouthpieces who never even got their bachelor's degrees!
Wow, ANY time? You're keeping score?
You are so full of it.
That kind of generalization is nonsense, and you know it.
He reminds me of my little sister, when we were kids. If she thought I took more than my share of candy, it was always "Harlan always takes all of the candy all of the time and never lets me have one piece!"
Sort of cute from an emotional 5 year old girl, sort of embarrassing coming from a grown man or woman.
Evidence of this? (aside from the frightening squirming bits inside your head)
I frequently read these board and do not recall any of those people ever saying a minority cannot be a racist. Do you have something to back this claim up?
RICH people can live in any house and any neighborhood their money will allow. Ask P. Diddy how many of his neighbors are white in the Hamptons . .
I'm not bitchin but money talks internationally; we all know this to be true!
The point of this article was the LIES Michelle Malkin told, simply for the purpose of discrediting a President that she disagrees with. Nothing to do with facts, nothing to do with policy, the entire book appears to be nothing by a broad brushed smear job for the purpose of scoring political points and making money off of people foolish enough to pay for this kind of trash.
This malkin lady must be getting a fat check from her right wing friends for writing this waste of ink and paper! How can you come up with enough evidence to write 400 pages on book about a president that was elected 6 months ago but ignore the fiasco of the last 8 years?
So, drugbaugh, beck, weiner-savage, malkin, O'racist, vannity, etc are all dems playing by dems rules by calling Obama a racist? Really? Are you this stupid or just pretending?
After coming to this country, they seem to make a choice, consciously or unconsciously, between 1) Asian as another white people /almost white minority and 2) Asian as non-white. If you pick 1) Asian almost white line, you may tend to see black people as intellectually inferior and resent any inference by anyone to put you together with them as minorities. I have many friends in this category. They will point out that minority scholarship applications exclude Asians because the recipients will be all Asian otherwise.
The choice 2) is what I picked. I believe Asians are brothers and sister of black people who are only a bit darker than us. We share history of prejudice and need to help out each other against any form of prejudice based on the color of skin, narrow eyes and so on. Without black people's struggle, there would have been no Asians in prominent offices in the US. In fact, Asians reaped much greater share of benefit than the black people. Look at the Ivy League colleges now. It's filled with Asians. They succeeded because of the culturally strong family values that were stolen from black people during the slavery. Yes, they are hard workers, but hey, it does not give them license to despise people who did not succeed and suffering in the many facets of the poverty. How would you have felt if some white boss of the Chinese chambermaid told you that you are ignorant because you are still poor at the turn of the centry.
It was the black people who stood up, took risk, bullets and dedicated lives for the civil rights. In the end, all the minorities benefited. Asians need to remember who fought for their civil rights. We owe our liberty to the civil rights marchers.
The way I was raised, anyone can be a racist.
It all has to do with the way you treat people who are "different" than you.
Maybe you're a racist?
She can be a racist against black people because she is not black! She is Filipino! I knew a Chinese girl who was racist against a girl from Thailand because she was not a "pure blood" like the Chinese are.
Excuse me while I wipe the water from my monitor screen. Snort!!
So now they're going to start attacking Michelle Obama, why wasn't there ever a bigger story made out of a young Laura Bush running a stop sign and killing a young man? Can you imagine if Michelle Obama had done the same? They would have been running that 24/7 before the election.
she is telling lies and distortions consistently and gets called out for it all the time.
maybe shill would be better suited to your tastes
It makes me wonder what kind of tune Malkin would be singing about internment if Abu Sayyaf ever targeted the U.S.
Btw I like your posts.
As Michelle Malkin herself put it:
Here’s another pathetic attempt to “debunk” Culture of Corruption from the lavishly-funded operatives at Media Matters, who claim I “distorted” Liza Mundy’s biograpy of Michelle Obama because — gasp! — I didn’t mention in my book that Mrs. Obama’s father had multiple sclerosis.
The Media Matters crew tosses out various ad hominems and non sequiturs, but fails to refute my fundamental point: Michelle Robinson Obama was literally born into the Daley patronage machine and political corruptocracy. She worked for that machine, followed Daley legal counsel Valerie Jarrett to the University of Chicago Medical Center, saw her salary triple after her husband won his Senate seat, and brought Jarrett and other Daley intimates into the East Wing. The nutroots defend Mrs. O by citing her “cynicism” of machine politics.
Well, yes. She’s very good at expressing “cynicism” and disdain for the dance partners who brought her to power. It’s the Obama Way.
Thank you.
One other thing: Michelle Malkin is the most vile, disgusting commentator in America. She has actually referred to Iraq war protestors as terrorists and posted the names and contact information of protestors online. These people immediately received death threats.
One of these days, people will die because of Malkin's hate and everyone will see that the pool of blood on her hands has its own rip currents.
Malkin and people like her - Hannity, Savage, Limbaugh, Coulter, Beck etc....don't even bother to couch their racism and hatred in subtle 'code' language anymore....they are right out there front and center, whipping up the lunatics who agree with their sick agenda.
Wingnut Welfare: see e.g. Goldberg, Jonah; Goldberg, Bernie; O'Reilly, Bill; Beck, Glenn; Levin, Mark; Coulter, Ann and a host of others.
As Mencken pointed out decades ago, no one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public.
I purchased the classic Limbaugh books, about $0.20 each, used from our local library. It was to help support the library, and to 'know your enemy', a paraphrase of much of what Sun Tzu said in The Art Of War
yeah, right. she's on one of the Sunday morning talk shows today.
and surprise, it's not Fox!
To summarize, if Malkin's layer of BS cannot be true, the next layer of BS must be true, or is probably true. Her buffoonery blazes paths, and is the reason for her usefulness to the lizard brains and the greedy. Selfishness is only the desire to keep what one owns. Greed is when one wants what others have as well, and it comes with an encyclopedia of ready excuses for ignoring common decency.
If you ever listen to Sean Hannity's radio show, you'll hear torture inflicted on the word "literally" that would be considered inhumane even by those who think waterboarding is funny.
What a surprise.......not.
She is typical of almost every con out there. Character assassin, lies, half truths, etc.
Yep, all in a day's lie for Malkin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoM90bAsr1M&feature=player_embedded
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/just-when-you-thought-al-gore%E2%80%99s-head-couldn%E2%80%99t-get-any-bigger-part-ii/?print=1
Do you know how bad it is, when you're searching for someone "famous" to back you up, and you can only come up with VACLAV KLAUS from Czechoslovakia??? That means, that's the best reputable person in her corner that she could find! And he isn't reputable, read below.
The bastion of truth, expert on global warming: VACLAV KLAUS!!!
Now, don't get your Czech Republic presidents named "VACLAV" mixed up, Michelle! Because the Czech's FIRST president's name was also "VACLAV"! VACLAV HAVEL! And if your finger which you used on your mouse to google VACLAV KLAUS is still working, you will find that Vaclav Havel had your Global Warming "expert" VACLAV KLAUS of being a "capitalist gangster":
"Czech President Václav Havel publicly referred to Klaus' economic policies as "gangster capitalism" and blamed the prime minister for perceived corruption surrounding his policy of voucher privatization and his côterie of close allies such as the dentist, politician, and entrepreneur Miroslav Macec or StB honcho Václav Junek. Havel profited from the sale of his restituted properties, including a ballroom in downtown Prague, so his critics call him one of the major profiteers of the new gangster capitalism which he had decried."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%83%C2%A1clav_Klaus
Good thing Malkin didn't quote the wrong president of Czechoslovakia named VACLAV!!!
That Czech presidents seem to be named VACLAV...that's another subject!
the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
If MM couldn't find anything substantial (and they didn't), they should have just let this one go.
Pretty lame, MM, IMHO. Pretty lame.
As for, I doubt you read it.
Media Matters claims that "Vice Presidents" of hospitals earn what she made. Unfortunately, Michelle Obama didn't have a medical or law degree when she was appointed "vice president for community and external affairs", (such an important position, they never bothered to fill it after she left).
Stick to easier battles, you can't win this one.
Here’s another pathetic attempt to “debunk” Culture of Corruption from the lavishly-funded operatives at Media Matters, who claim I “distorted” Liza Mundy’s biograpy of Michelle Obama because — gasp! — I didn’t mention in my book that Mrs. Obama’s father had multiple sclerosis.
The Media Matters crew tosses out various ad hominems and non sequiturs, but fails to refute my fundamental point: Michelle Robinson Obama was literally born into the Daley patronage machine and political corruptocracy. She worked for that machine, followed Daley legal counsel Valerie Jarrett to the University of Chicago Medical Center, saw her salary triple after her husband won his Senate seat, and brought Jarrett and other Daley intimates into the East Wing. The nutroots defend Mrs. O by citing her “cynicism” of machine politics.
Well, yes. She’s very good at expressing “cynicism” and disdain for the dance partners who brought her to power. It’s the Obama Way.
You are wrong..Shoes could literally write the article and still not be able to defend it..he would argue against it.
You can't be weak to do that. You need to be all-over or scatter brained.
But why is this woman given airtime any any network to sell her disgusting, uncorroborated HATEFILLED books!!
Why doesn't she just buy airtime to sell her books? Is there anyone who doesn't believe she's an inhumane, racist?
I just don't want to waste my energy at researching what Ms. Malkin did to first of all, obtain a US resident visa, second, to manage attending a prestigious law school, to become an under rater lawyer....
At least she can express herself through a pencil, too bad she is using one of her most remarkable qualities, (the art of telling lies) to show off her writing skills...
Cheating on wives, however, is so common it isn't even worth commenting on...
Take a look at today's (Aug. 3, 2009) Doonesbury - priceless!
Sad