About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Malkin distorts Michelle Obama biography to attack her and her father as corrupt

August 01, 2009 8:02 pm ET — 124 Comments

In her new book, Culture of Corruption, conservative columnist Michelle Malkin claims that first lady Michelle Obama "was literally born into the Chicago political corruptocracy," suggesting that because her father was a volunteer precinct captain and held a city job, she was a party to cronyism and embraced the practice. In fact, the biography of Michelle Obama that Malkin cites to make this case actually argued that the first lady's experience in the "powerful political machine" of Richard J. Daley made her and her family "extremely cynical about politics and politicians" until they met "Barack [Obama], whose political career was pushed in part by a coalition of people who had grown up in opposition to Daley and whose goal was breaking the Machine."

Malkin asserts Michelle Obama was born into "Chicago political corruptocracy"

From Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies (Regnery Publishing, July 2009):

In the Chicago patronage culture that made Michelle Obama, the color that matters most is neither black nor white, it is green -- the color of money. Mrs. Obama was literally born into the Chicago political corruptocracy. Her father, Fraser Robinson, was a volunteer precinct caption for the Democrat Party [sic]. Washington Post writer Liza Mundy called him "an essential member of the powerful political machine run by [Richard J.] Daley, who, in addition to being mayor, was the chairman of the Cook County Democratic Central Committee, meaning he controlled both the government and the political party, and could use one to do the other's bidding." Former alderman Leon Despres bluntly told Mundy that it was "overwhelmingly likely" that Robinson's job at the city water department was a reward for his loyalty. "The water department, where Fraser Robinson worked, was a renowned repository of patronage jobs."

Why such little scrutiny of Michelle the Merciless (or "That Other Michelle," as she's known in my house) and her crony-aided rise to power? Like her husband, Mrs. Obama is quick to play the victim card when her ill-considered statements and her dealings come under scrutiny. I don't call her President Obama's bitter half for nothing. [Page 43]

Biography cited by Malkin actually reported that Michelle Obama disliked machine politics

Liza Mundy's Michelle: A Biography actually explains that "Chicago in the 1960s was almost certainly the source of her oft-expressed skepticism about politics." Contrary to Malkin's use of Mundy's book to suggest that Michelle Obama embraced the culture of the Daley machine, Mundy actually writes:

While there were many pleasures in Michelle's childhood -- bikes could be left on sidewalks and moms could stay home and children could roam more freely than they do now -- it's also indisputable that the Chicago she grew up in was not entirely hospitable to citizens like Fraser Robinson and his aspirations to move his family forward. Her dad and her community may well explain her own grounded and hard-working nature, as well as her commitment to her children, but Chicago in the 1960s was almost certainly the source of her oft-expressed skepticism about politics. It was not only a racist and highly segregated city, but one with a complex and ambiguous political system, a system that Fraser Robinson participated in, either because he enjoyed politics or because it was one of the few paths open to an ambitious black man. [Michelle: A Biography, Page 23]

Mundy argued that Robinsons were "extremely cynical about politics and politicians" until they met Obama. Mundy reported:

But it's also likely that for all the pride Michelle took in her father's professional dedication, she also drew a lesson about politics. Part of Michelle's skepticism about it comes form the version she saw up close as a little girl: how the system bought you and protected you, but also controlled you. "If you didn't do this, didn't behave in a certain way," says [Don] Rose [Chicago political consultant and historian of city government], "you could lose your pay, [the Machine could] demote you, fire you." People who underperformed in their political work were susceptible to being "vised," or summarily fired. That was politics in Chicago. "Some of [Michelle's] subconscious -- some of her disdain as to politics could have to do with how [her father] was treated, and what he had to go through," says Al Kindle, a political consultant who grew up on the South Side.

And that, Kindle says, is why the black community was ambivalent about patronage and about Daley: the Machine lifted you up -- got you services and perks -- at the same time that it kept you down. "It was clear that you didn't get access to certain services unless you were a friend to the power structure. That spigot could be cut off. As a young African American with a family, you had to think about that with a jaundiced eye. Just as it helped you, it restricted your choice." So it could be that Robinson's son and daughter developed a dislike for politics even as they developed a deep, deep love for him. "We as a family were extremely cynical about politics and politicians" is how Craig [Robinson, Michelle Obama's brother] puts it. That started to change when they met Barack, whose political career was pushed in part by a coalition of people who had grown up in opposition to Daley and whose goal was breaking the Machine. [Michelle: A Biography, Pages 30-31]

Malkin ignored biography's argument that Frank Robinson had little choice but to be politically active while holding a city job

A former Chicago alderman told Mundy: "[T]he majority of the people were [serving as precinct captains] because their jobs depended on it." Mundy reported:

As a precinct captain, you could expect, in return for this political policing, a city job. In fact, doing "volunteer" work was almost the only way you could get one. "To get a city job, you'd have to have some kind of recommendation from your ward committeeman," says Don Rose, describing a system in which it was crucial to have a recommender, somebody watching out for you -- your patron. Daley kept a file cabinet with a list of jobs in it and was said to know the names of everybody who held them.

[...]

"We had some volunteers but the majority of the people were [serving as precinct captains] because their jobs depended on it," says Cliff Kelley, a former South Side alderman who [...] was familiar with machine culture. Most of the time, Kelley says, a person's political activism, and the job he held, were inseparably linked. [Michelle: A Biography, Pages 28-29]

In '50s and '60s, city jobs "insulated" African Americans "from the capriciousness and racism of the open job market." Mundy reported:

A city job was particularly valuable to an African American in that it insulated him somewhat from the capriciousness and racism of the open job market. "This was in the fifties and early sixties. Before affirmative action, patronage was as close as you could get to affirmative action, and if you didn't get rich, at least it was a steady job," says Rose. [Michelle: A Biography, Pages 28-29]

Malkin attacks Fraser Robinson, doesn't note he had M.S. but worked every day for decades "without complaint"

Citing Mundy's book in attacking Fraser Robinson, Malkin ignored Mundy's reporting that Robinson worked every day for decades despite being "crippled by multiple sclerosis." Mundy described Fraser Robinson as a "vigorous man who was crippled by multiple sclerosis, a progressive disease that set in when he was just in his thirties." Mundy wrote that Fraser's "congenial presence defined the home" Michelle Obama grew up in, with his "unflinching work ethic, his deep commitment to family, his view that who you are is defined not only by how you behave in public but what you do in the shadows, when nobody is watching." [Michelle: A Biography, Page 22]. Mundy added that Michelle and Craig "describe what an inspiration it was to both of them, seeing Fraser Robinson get up to go to work every day, something that became increasingly difficult after his disease set in. Despite the fact that he needed a cane -- and, later, crutches and eventually a motorized cart -- he never stopped working." [Michelle: A Biography, Page 30]

Mundy notes that in describing her father's "premature death," Michelle Obama said, "He died on his way to work." Mundy wrote that Fraser Robinson "had recently been in the hospital for a kidney operation, and afterward died unexpectedly of complications," adding that Michelle Obama also said of his passing: "He wasn't feeling well, but he was going to get in that car and go." [Michelle: A Biography, Page 30]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (August 01, 2009 8:09 pm ET)
      9 1
      Why all of the nastiness towards Michelle Obama all of a sudden? She's been, thus far, what I would consider a great first lady. And Malkin's book is a bunch of BS that she imagined no doubt.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by archae (August 01, 2009 9:19 pm ET)
        13 1
        Don't forget this is Michelle Malkin.
        She made a name for herself writing a revisionist "history" book saying the internment of Japanese-Americans was all right, and that Muslims should be interned the same way.

        Malkin is a racist, pure and simple.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 12:36 am ET)
          2 25
          Malkin cant be a racist according to the rules here. She is a minority, so she can not be racist by the dem rules. Sorry, try again.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (August 02, 2009 1:12 am ET)
            13 2
            Troller is looking for a response...ANY response, and he will chum the waters with complaints, insults, compliments, and inflammatory tidbits hoping that someone...ANYONE, will take the bait.

            [http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/Assets/troller.jpg]
            Report Abuse
              • Author by kfraz43 (August 02, 2009 1:54 am ET)
                14 2
                I think that's the just about the most ignorant thing I've seen you type here, and you've posted some doozies. Just because someone is a minority they can't be a racist? If you really think that's true, could you please get your Faux Noise buddies out of the president's jock?

                I know you're trying to be ironic. It's just not working. For irony to be effective, it needs to actually be rooted in irony.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by blk-in-alabam (August 02, 2009 8:20 am ET)
                8 1
                Then why have you called The President,and other black people racist.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (August 02, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
                6 1
                You're way off base here. I think just about everyone on this site will concede that anyone can be a racist.

                It's just that the most recent people folks like yourself like to talk about as being racist, aren't.

                Examples. Obama. Sotomayor. And so on.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
                3  
                Your typical strawman.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (August 02, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
                7  
                "Malkin cant be a racist according to the rules here."

                Wow, there's RULES for racism? Do you know where I can find the definitive rule book?

                Anyway, IMO, Malkin is not so much a racist as she is a defender of white privilege.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by rms (August 02, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
                5  
                Um, PoV...

                When you are already at the bottom of the hole, stop digging...
                Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (August 02, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
              1  
              Mary, neat cartoon. One day I'll figure out how to use the thingy where I can post a picture.

              As far as pointy goes, I think he secretly loves all of us, especially WZ and Harley. He's like a boy in school that pulls a girl's pigtails because he really likes her ;-0)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (August 02, 2009 11:27 pm ET)
                1  
                He's my bestest friend ever. We call liberals names together to maintain our friendship. Just yesterday I called Mr. News a liberal poopy head and my bestest friend gave me a thumbs up!
                Report Abuse
            • Author by bip84124092 (August 03, 2009 7:59 pm ET)
                 
              Yes, I know I shouldn't have responded but I just couldn't help it.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (August 02, 2009 8:06 am ET)
            7 2
            The point isn't that it's not possible for a minority to be a racist, it's that a minority isn't racist because they want equality or because they make a comment about a specific white man's actions.

            Why is it so difficult for some people to view life in anything other than black-and-white terms?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by progressiveright (August 02, 2009 10:52 am ET)
              3 2
              To be a racistis something that anyone can be. All it means is you have a prejudice against one race.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
              2 13
              It is amazing how you all change your tune when you are attacking a minority. Time after time here, the dems have defended Wright and Gates, and said because they are black they can not be racist.

              Now, when a minority does not sing the song you like to hear she is a racist. The only thing that has changed is her party affiliation. The double standards and the apologies for racist dems never stops here.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (August 02, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
                5  
                I'm not sure who you're referring to. Obviously a black person could be prejudiced against someone of another race. One thing that seems to confuse some conservatives is that some black people will use the n-word as something other than derogatory. In that argument, I've said that the usage is not the same as the racist usage. In that way, I've said that black people aren't very likely to be racist against themselves. Obviously there's nothing to stop them from being prejudiced against another race at all, or to stop any minority from being prejudiced against any other minority.

                And again...
                ...it's that a minority isn't racist because they want equality or because they make a comment about a specific white man's actions.
                So anything about affirmative action or anything of that sort isn't "racist". That's a very common charge from the right on these boards, so perhaps the argument against that is what you're thinking of. Or the argument that Obama is racist for saying that Crowly acted "stupidly". That's one person's specific actions. It's not that it's impossible for him to be racist, it's that the facts simply do not bear out the charge in any way.

                I have seen the argument once or twice that black people can't be racist because they have no power. I've addressed that, explaining that would be systemic racism. So I haven't changed my tune on anything, and since I haven't seen the argument you're referring to very often at all, I have to think you're conflating two very different points.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
                  2 8
                  Barb

                  You do show reason on this topic. I did not name names, but if it helps, The Col, Solon, Pearl, Onceyougobarak, easytorefutewingnuts, mary, harley, and vhw, to name just a very few..have all argued many times that a it is impossible for a minority to be racist.

                  You are generally pretty reasonable, but to claim that you have not read these people specifically, and many others generally claim on many different posts and threads that a minority simply can not be racist is not believable. All you have to do is examine virtually any of the Gates or Wright threads and you see it all over the place.

                  Like many conservatives, I am opposed to affirmative action. It is nothing more than legislated racism. But that is not my point here. It is interesting to note that one significant figure who has voiced concern over AA is the President himself. He, like many conservatives, has noted that these programs should shift away from race, and focus more on SEC status.

                  My point is what a crutch the racist label has become. Any time the dems dont like what a conservative has said or done, they label them a racist, while at the same time, declaring it is jut not possible for dems or minorities to be racist. It is laughable at best.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (August 02, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
                    5 1
                    You can cite examples if you like. I haven't seen "black people can't be racist because they're black" from those people as far as I remember.

                    I've also disagreed with the argument that Dems can't be racist. I think I've seen that once. Liberals can't be racist by definition, because it's not consistent with the label itself.

                    You should also bear in mind that the philosophies are different. Conservatives tend to favor the status quo, less government power, free market rule, etc. Those things allow racism much more than affirmative action, federal discrimination laws and regulations, etc. So it's sort of naive to look at it as "if one side does it then the other side must too". There's very clearly a reason that there's more racism on one side than the other.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (August 02, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
                    3  
                    And I appreciate the compliment. I do try my best to be fair.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by pbg (August 02, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
                    10 1
                    Your point seems to be that racism is just something that liberals saywhenever right wingers attack a black man.
                    There's ttwo parts to this:
                    1) that liberals sling the word around irresponsibly.
                    and
                    2) that racism isn't significant.

                    Part 1) is arguable; part 2 is not, and to argue it is pernicious.

                    Two years ago I buried my best friend, a brilliant artist who was good enough to work for the major comic book companies, but who couldn't get local ad work because he was a black man married to a white woman. I, a scruffy looking whiteguy who tends to dress like a Bowery bum, was able toclear up account problems with his utilities in minutes thathewith his black face was unable to straighten out.

                    I have seen the snarling face of racism right in front of me, and felt its hot sour breath.

                    Yes, not every criticism of Barack Obama is racist, and we know that you guys will pick up whatever rock you have to hand: if it had been Hillary, we've got a pretty good idea what you'd have said. And sure, you'll call a war heroa coward, so you'll call a professor of Constitutional Law at one of the most prestigious law schools in the country a dope, You'll say anything at all.

                    And I'll even say that, knowing many Filipinos, I know that Malkin's hatred of the Japanese is shared by a huge number of them, and she probably learned from infancy. And there are big reasons for that hatred.

                    But saying that accusations of racism are just a ploy is an attempt to devalue the term, to make it meaningless. Just like shouting 'playing the race card.

                    You might not be racists for doing so, you just might be cynical opportunists who will use any rhetorical trick, libel or slander that's to hand.
                    But racism exists. And, whether you want to or not, you're doing its job.

                    (And isn't it amazing that the right, after 8 years of screaming about militant Islam as an existential threat, worse than the Commies and the Nazs combined, suddenly finds that welfare cheats and socialism is far more important? Where'd all that danger go?)

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mary59 (August 02, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Great post, pbg. And I'd add to pointy that I've defended Rev. Wright. That's quite a stretch for him to say that I believe that minorities can't be racists. Please.

                      Malkin is shilling and whether she is prejudiced or not I don't know (although her bias against Japanese people does seem quite apparent)
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by juliajayne1 (August 02, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
                        4  
                        I wonder if Malkin has ever talked to anybody who was in the internment camps. I have. A pair of sisters who live in California named Amy and Laura. Both Dems, btw, as travelers usually are in my experience ;-)

                        At the time they were 78 and 80 and told me of their time in the camps. It was a powerful story of two people whose lives were disrupted when they were teens and who eventually reconciled their awful experience and still love America despite it.

                        And I would say that Michelle Malkin, whatever her heart really says, is a shameless shill who lies and dissembles for profit. Not very flattering.

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
                        2 4
                        I know you have defended Wright, thats why i listed you. It is beyond belief to me how you can not condemn his remarks about Jewish people.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
                      1 4
                      And the left attacked McCain, a war hero as well. I have heard all of those points before.

                      Yes, of course racism exists. To suggest that I am "doing its job" as you say is insane. There are plenty of reasons to object to Obama and his policies. None of them have to do with race or racism.

                      Your sly attempt to go from racism exists to then saying that I and other conservatives are helping racism achieve its goal goes full circle. You begin trying to counter my point that liberals throw racism charges around to easily and then you do just that.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by snoopy (August 02, 2009 11:32 pm ET)
                        3 1
                        And the left attacked McCain, a war hero as well.


                        Yup, I purposely did in response to the lies the right told. And I made it pretty darned clear that was why I did it. Y'all can dish it out, but you can't take it is the lesson here.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by SMTDL (August 03, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
                        2  
                        "Your sly attempt to go from racism exists to then saying that I and other conservatives are helping racism achieve its goal goes full circle."

                        Conservatives do allow racism to achieve its goal when they don't denounce it when it comes from heir colleagues,friends,political comrades,etc..When Republicans at a Palin campaign rally called for vilolence to Candidate Obama based on her "pals with terrorist " rhetoric ..she said nothing.When the danger of allowing this was behavior was likened to the George Wallace era ,the McCain campaign acted insulted.When racist commentary from Limbaugh,Beck,etc.,is not denounced by conservatives/republicans in powerful positions..they certainly enable that behavior to gain a measure acceptance by some.If Conservatives were so concerned about racism why do they rarely speakout about it when members of their party or partisan groups make one of their almost weekly racist comments or emails.You give it credence thru benign tolerance !!Any prominent Conservatives that criticized the POTUS's comments on the Gates matter comment on the Boston cop's racist email???I must have missed it!!
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by magnolialover (August 03, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
                        1  
                        I don't remember anyone attacking McCain's war record do you? Nope, you don't. We attacked McCain on his positions, and his policy statements.

                        I have defended Wright before, simply because he's not a racist. Never have been shown any proof that he is, or was one. He's so racist, his church is open to all different people of all different colors. Man, that's a hard core racist right here.

                        Saying something bad about Jewish people isn't racist, since Judaism is a religion, not a particular race of people. Anyone can be Jewish.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 10:36 am ET)
                         
                      Great post pbg!
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
                    1  
                    As someone who opposes Affirmative Action, what do you think If a company has a hiring manager that is a racist and will not hire any qualified non-whites at the work-place. You believe that is fine? No reason for government intervention or lawsuits there? If you would not be okay with this, how exactly do you think the free market would remedy the situation? Do you think there should be additional government remedies?

                    I never really hear Republican alternatives to AA, which leads me to believe, you do not have any and that discrimination against minorities is not a problem.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                        3
                      There are plenty of laws on the books to prosecute those that discriminate in hiring, firing, housing, banking, etc. That is not AA, that is enforcing laws on the books.

                      Companies that refuse to hire qualified individuals will pay criminally, in the civil court system, and even more so from not hiring the best employees they can. That is fundamentally different then lowering law school or medically school admission standards based on race, or quota systems in hiring or promotions.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
                        2  
                        There are plenty of laws on the books to prosecute those that discriminate in hiring, firing, housing, banking, etc. That is not AA, that is enforcing laws on the books.


                        Hmmm... Outside of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which has always been a cornerstone of AA regarding hiring), what other federal laws would prevent discrimination in hiring against non-whites - assuming it was nullified?
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 8:30 pm ET)
                        2  
                        I also should remind you that racial quotas with regards to admissions have been deemed illegal by the courts, so that is a moot point.

                        With regards to AA, I think most people would agree that universities have a reasonable interest in admitting students from diverse backgrounds.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
                            5
                          Universities have an interest in admitting qualified students who can handle and are prepared for the work required. Math does not require diversity, it requires the proper foundation and academic prep work.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 10:04 pm ET)
                            2  
                            I do not see any admissions offices that have said AA students aren't academically qualified. Some may be arguably considered less academically qualified, but not unqualified.

                            Secondly, you have not mentioned any laws that would replace the AA cornerstone Civil Rights Law of 1964. I would be interested in your response.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by pointofview (August 03, 2009 1:00 am ET)
                                3
                              I am trying to follow you on this, but why would it be necessary to replace it?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by open_mind (August 03, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
                                1  
                                From the arguments on the Right I have seen regarding AA, they nearly uniformly advocate removing the protections in the CRA of 1964 on the basis that the act supposedly unfairly protects non-whites and women from discrimination, but not white males. I have not seen an alternative replacement proposed by conservatives on this.

                                Assuming the CRA of 1964 would indeed be repealed, there does not appear to be an alternative basis for a non-white or female to sue for discrimination.
                                Report Abuse
                          • Author by steveanders_62273 (August 03, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
                            1  
                            I love how conservatives act as if AA is letting in all of these unqualified candidates yet they make no mention of the unqualified cnadidates that get in beacuse they are legacy or their families donate. IE Bush. That is another form of AA. Let me ask you this question. Would you rather be a black applicant appltying to a university with good grades or a wealthy, white leagacy applicant with bad grades. I think we all know who gets in first.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 03, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
                        1  
                        I can see where your cynicism comes from, consdiering the amazing success stories that Alan Keyes, Michael Steele and Clarence Thomas turned out to be. But you shouldn't judge a race solely based on it's conservative memebers. If you did, WHITE PEOPLE would look like incredibly stupid, backwards, completely ignorant jackasses!

                        Lowering standards indeed. This from the party lead by a bunch of mouthpieces who never even got their bachelor's degrees!
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (August 02, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
                    1  
                    "Any time the dems dont like what a conservative has said or done, they label them a racist..."

                    Wow, ANY time? You're keeping score?

                    You are so full of it.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by rms (August 02, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
                    1  
                    "Any time the dems dont like what a conservative has said or done, they label them a racist."

                    That kind of generalization is nonsense, and you know it.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 03, 2009 2:40 am ET)
                      5  
                      POinty depends on these ridiculous generalizations on a regular basis to support his feeble arguments.

                      He reminds me of my little sister, when we were kids. If she thought I took more than my share of candy, it was always "Harlan always takes all of the candy all of the time and never lets me have one piece!"

                      Sort of cute from an emotional 5 year old girl, sort of embarrassing coming from a grown man or woman.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 03, 2009 2:30 am ET)
                    5 1
                    I did not name names, but if it helps, The Col, Solon, Pearl, Onceyougobarak, easytorefutewingnuts, mary, harley, and vhw, to name just a very few..have all argued many times that a it is impossible for a minority to be racist.(POinty)

                    Evidence of this? (aside from the frightening squirming bits inside your head)
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by LKL (August 03, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
                       
                    "The Col, Solon, Pearl, Onceyougobarak, easytorefutewingnuts, mary, harley, and vhw, to name just a very few..have all argued many times that a it is impossible for a minority to be racist."

                    I frequently read these board and do not recall any of those people ever saying a minority cannot be a racist. Do you have something to back this claim up?
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
                5 1
                Gates is apparently so racist he marries white women and has bi-racial children with them. It is obvious he just hates white people. Lol.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Lizinbklyn (August 03, 2009 11:04 am ET)
                   
                Malkin a 'minority', you're jesting, she's RICH . .

                RICH people can live in any house and any neighborhood their money will allow. Ask P. Diddy how many of his neighbors are white in the Hamptons . .

                I'm not bitchin but money talks internationally; we all know this to be true!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by The_Cat (August 03, 2009 11:13 am ET)
                2  
                Very well done, pointofview. You've successfully distracted most of this thread with a deliberately foolish and incendiary statement about racism. Racism is simply discrimination, whether for or against, based on race. It's got nothing to do with the race of the person who is accused of racism, which you should know very well.

                The point of this article was the LIES Michelle Malkin told, simply for the purpose of discrediting a President that she disagrees with. Nothing to do with facts, nothing to do with policy, the entire book appears to be nothing by a broad brushed smear job for the purpose of scoring political points and making money off of people foolish enough to pay for this kind of trash.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Wilcopc1 (August 03, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
                     
                  "The point of this article was the LIES Michelle Malkin told, simply for the purpose of discrediting a President that she disagrees with. Nothing to do with facts, nothing to do with policy, the entire book appears to be nothing by a broad brushed smear job for the purpose of scoring political points and making money off of people foolish enough to pay for this kind of trash."

                  This malkin lady must be getting a fat check from her right wing friends for writing this waste of ink and paper! How can you come up with enough evidence to write 400 pages on book about a president that was elected 6 months ago but ignore the fiasco of the last 8 years?
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by jediknight65 (August 03, 2009 6:45 pm ET)
                   
                and what about the numerous dubious if not near racist statements you have made time and again?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by progressiveright (August 02, 2009 10:50 am ET)
            4 2
            A minority can be a racist and there is no dem rule that says otherwise it is minority racists on both sides that say that.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by harley (August 02, 2009 11:42 am ET)
            5 4
            She is a minority, so she can not be racist by the dem rules


            So, drugbaugh, beck, weiner-savage, malkin, O'racist, vannity, etc are all dems playing by dems rules by calling Obama a racist? Really? Are you this stupid or just pretending?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (August 02, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
              1 10
              As you usual harley, you are an idiot and post nothing of value
              Report Abuse
              • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (August 02, 2009 9:22 pm ET)
                5  
                pov,Actually HARLEY always makes more sense and coherence than you ever do.You sir are an idiot and post nothing of value.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by political_left-religious_right (August 03, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
                  2  
                  I would add that our friend pointless is intelligence-ist, in that he demeans anyone who has any.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by georgee (August 02, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
            1  
            I am an Asian and I can assure you that minority can be a racist. Many Asians do not like to be prejudiced just because they are Asian but at the same time, they don't like to be treated like blacks. This sentiment is notable and obvious in the new immigrants than Asians resides in the States for generations. It is due to the fact that it is very rare to see black people in many Asian countries.
            After coming to this country, they seem to make a choice, consciously or unconsciously, between 1) Asian as another white people /almost white minority and 2) Asian as non-white. If you pick 1) Asian almost white line, you may tend to see black people as intellectually inferior and resent any inference by anyone to put you together with them as minorities. I have many friends in this category. They will point out that minority scholarship applications exclude Asians because the recipients will be all Asian otherwise.
            The choice 2) is what I picked. I believe Asians are brothers and sister of black people who are only a bit darker than us. We share history of prejudice and need to help out each other against any form of prejudice based on the color of skin, narrow eyes and so on. Without black people's struggle, there would have been no Asians in prominent offices in the US. In fact, Asians reaped much greater share of benefit than the black people. Look at the Ivy League colleges now. It's filled with Asians. They succeeded because of the culturally strong family values that were stolen from black people during the slavery. Yes, they are hard workers, but hey, it does not give them license to despise people who did not succeed and suffering in the many facets of the poverty. How would you have felt if some white boss of the Chinese chambermaid told you that you are ignorant because you are still poor at the turn of the centry.
            It was the black people who stood up, took risk, bullets and dedicated lives for the civil rights. In the end, all the minorities benefited. Asians need to remember who fought for their civil rights. We owe our liberty to the civil rights marchers.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bilbo_dies (August 02, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
            3  
            I guess I missed those rules.

            The way I was raised, anyone can be a racist.
            It all has to do with the way you treat people who are "different" than you.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by overmars jr. (August 02, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
            2  
            Ummm, you do realize there is more than one minority race, right? And that they can have a problem with another minority race... right?

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Anya (August 02, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
               
            She can have an internalized oppression - which explains her anti-immigrant rants considering she is the daughter of immigrants.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by j.kerry285455 (August 02, 2009 8:03 pm ET)
               
            Sorry, she's a racist. It doesn't matter what your skin color is, you can be a racist: Are you serious? LOL. Michelle Malkin is Filipina, Michelle Obama is Black. So I don't see how to people of a different ethnicity can not be a racist towards a racist.


            Maybe you're a racist?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ephg (August 02, 2009 11:19 pm ET)
               
            Dear Troll:
            She can be a racist against black people because she is not black! She is Filipino! I knew a Chinese girl who was racist against a girl from Thailand because she was not a "pure blood" like the Chinese are.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by coldteablues19577325 (August 03, 2009 2:51 am ET)
            2  
            "Malkin cant be a racist according to the rules here. She is a minority, so she can not be racist by the dem rules. Sorry, try again."

            Excuse me while I wipe the water from my monitor screen. Snort!!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by KLJTech (August 03, 2009 7:27 am ET)
            2  
            Sure she can, she's an idiot.

            So now they're going to start attacking Michelle Obama, why wasn't there ever a bigger story made out of a young Laura Bush running a stop sign and killing a young man? Can you imagine if Michelle Obama had done the same? They would have been running that 24/7 before the election.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (August 03, 2009 11:35 am ET)
               
            Who ever said that minorities can't be racist?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by 021368 (August 03, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
               
            That is idiotic. Anyone can be racist. There are racists who hate there own race. Michelle Malkin isn't a racist, she's just another misinformed conservative who thinks owning a gun, going to Church, makes her an American. She doesn't realize that she will always be looked at as a wannabee....Just like M. Steele.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (August 03, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
               
            And as anyone who visits MMfA can plainly see, POV always has been and always will be an idiot.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jediknight65 (August 03, 2009 6:42 pm ET)
               
            ok, buying your premise there for a minute, what would she be then?

            she is telling lies and distortions consistently and gets called out for it all the time.

            maybe shill would be better suited to your tastes
            Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (August 02, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
          1  
          "She made a name for herself writing a revisionist 'history' book saying the internment of Japanese-Americans was all right"

          It makes me wonder what kind of tune Malkin would be singing about internment if Abu Sayyaf ever targeted the U.S.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by reanna-mator (August 01, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
        13 1
        Mrs. Obama's been a stellar first lady. That's what bothers Malkin so much.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (August 02, 2009 2:24 am ET)
          13 3
          Truer words were never typed and even a Republican like me knows that it is a fact. Malkin represents ONLY the far right fringe in our party but if that group like Hannity, Limbaugh, Malkin. etc keep it up, many more will just get out like I had to to keep my sanity.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (August 02, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
            6  
            If folks like Malkin et all only represent the fringe part of the republican party, why do we hear from them all of the time? Isn't it time for you guys to take your party back and bring it back to a place of respect and honest debate?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (August 02, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
              4  
              Mari posts here pretty often, and has said she got out of the party because of those fringe people who have taken it down this path. I.e. she escaped the loony bin. Do I characterize you correctly, Mari?

              Btw I like your posts.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (August 01, 2009 10:22 pm ET)
        11  
        Because she is a powerful intellectual liberal black woman and that scares the HECK out of the right wing. Power to Michelle O!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Liberalism.is.a.mental.disorder (August 02, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
          2
        REALLY? This is the best critique MediaMatters can make? I guess Malkin is accurate in her writing. Nothing has been proven wrong here.

        As Michelle Malkin herself put it:

        Here’s another pathetic attempt to “debunk” Culture of Corruption from the lavishly-funded operatives at Media Matters, who claim I “distorted” Liza Mundy’s biograpy of Michelle Obama because — gasp! — I didn’t mention in my book that Mrs. Obama’s father had multiple sclerosis.

        The Media Matters crew tosses out various ad hominems and non sequiturs, but fails to refute my fundamental point: Michelle Robinson Obama was literally born into the Daley patronage machine and political corruptocracy. She worked for that machine, followed Daley legal counsel Valerie Jarrett to the University of Chicago Medical Center, saw her salary triple after her husband won his Senate seat, and brought Jarrett and other Daley intimates into the East Wing. The nutroots defend Mrs. O by citing her “cynicism” of machine politics.

        Well, yes. She’s very good at expressing “cynicism” and disdain for the dance partners who brought her to power. It’s the Obama Way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (August 03, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
          1  
          Did you even read Media Matters' critique? Where does MMFA above "toss out various ad hominems and non sequiturs"? Give an example of each so I know what you are talking about.

          Thank you.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by sheerinsanity (August 03, 2009 11:18 am ET)
        2  
        They realize that Obama's presidency is going better than they had thought (the economy is starting to turn around), so they go after Michelle Obama for no reason at all.

        One other thing: Michelle Malkin is the most vile, disgusting commentator in America. She has actually referred to Iraq war protestors as terrorists and posted the names and contact information of protestors online. These people immediately received death threats.

        One of these days, people will die because of Malkin's hate and everyone will see that the pool of blood on her hands has its own rip currents.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (August 01, 2009 9:08 pm ET)
      4  
      Conservative(republican) trademark,when they are trying to destroy you,they want to destroy everything that is you or connected to you.Mob mentality,is the basic way they motivate their base.The key to motivating a mob is to prevent,and not allow thinking to happen.A common method is to get people to call you patriotic,and smart.Implying they are smart enough to think for you.Malkin is on one of these you are so smart tours now
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (August 01, 2009 9:21 pm ET)
      8  
      The reason for the attacks on Michelle Obama: When you educate a man you give an individual a chance to be great,when you educate a woman you educate a nation.Michell Obama has the ability to educate women.This is something extremely fearful to those who ability to maintain,and get power,depends on people.s ignorance.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by reanna-mator (August 01, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
      7  
      Corruptocracy? So did we run out of legitimate words that scare people there, Michelle, and now we're coming out with tasteless portmanteaus?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Allegra (August 01, 2009 11:18 pm ET)
      1  
      Michelle Malkin represents the hateful,bigoted far-right contingent who twists and lies in order to defame and demonize anyone who cares about the poor, the disenfranchised, the struggling. She is one of the MOST hateful - so hateful that on the few occasions I've seen her speaking I notice her face is twisted into a frightening caricature of pure rage.

      Malkin and people like her - Hannity, Savage, Limbaugh, Coulter, Beck etc....don't even bother to couch their racism and hatred in subtle 'code' language anymore....they are right out there front and center, whipping up the lunatics who agree with their sick agenda.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tjmccool2284 (August 01, 2009 11:24 pm ET)
      7  
      Is the blogging not remunerative enough for the dear MM? Usually, Regnery gets them to write a book and then buys a lot of the printing in order to call it a best-seller so "authors" like the dear Malkin can get some cash.
      Wingnut Welfare: see e.g. Goldberg, Jonah; Goldberg, Bernie; O'Reilly, Bill; Beck, Glenn; Levin, Mark; Coulter, Ann and a host of others.

      As Mencken pointed out decades ago, no one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (August 02, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
        2  
        RE: Buying wingnut books

        I purchased the classic Limbaugh books, about $0.20 each, used from our local library. It was to help support the library, and to 'know your enemy', a paraphrase of much of what Sun Tzu said in The Art Of War
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rdirkse (August 02, 2009 12:53 am ET)
      4  
      Freedom of speech should not apply to MM. At least there should be consequences (negative ones) for the lies she spreads. Now she makes more money from a book and talk circuit? Oh, poor girl.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phredicles (August 02, 2009 1:01 am ET)
        3  
        It does get tempting to think about UK-style libel/slander laws, doesn't it?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jc@tx (August 02, 2009 3:11 am ET)
        1  
        consequences?

        yeah, right. she's on one of the Sunday morning talk shows today.
        and surprise, it's not Fox!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 02, 2009 11:59 am ET)
          8 1
          Yep! She will be a member of the roundtable on "This Week with George Stepenopolus." Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Lou Dobbs , and this lady among others can write and say the most decietful,meanest,destasteful,lies and they always seem to find an outlet in the MSM that will legitimize their outrageous fringe views, in most cases without counter argument. All in the name of "equivalency". I mean would they let someone come on to argue the earth is only 5,000 yrs old ,when we have proof that it is at least a billion or more years old? Ummmm...bad example they have! The point is the "left" is not taken seriously and are painted as loonies and marginalized. Yet just a cursory glance through history you find the left were at the forefront for unionization and the 8hr day, from human rights to equal rights,to Social Security to Medicare every progressive reform has been led and organized by the "left." The left tried to warn us about the lies the Bush administration were telling us about Iraq? The left told us about the abuses being carried out in our name at GITMO, Abu-Gharib,and the abuse of FISA! It was the left that exposed the unjust war in Viet Nam,you name it we have been right ,yet those who have lied to us and gotten it wrong costing us untold suffering and economic and human loss never seem to pay any price or loss of prestige in the MSM. In the name of presenting both sides of the argument what we actually get is shades of the same side.The terms right and left use to have meaning now the center has shifted so far right that anyone left of Rushbo is a "commie" pinko socialist pin head whose ideas and thoughts should not be taken seriously. So instead of a real healthcare reform debate that discusses what over 60% of the public want "single payer" system, we get the same old lies and distortions by the same old "talkers" who supposedly know what we should want! Seniors have been freigntened into believing that they are being targeted for extermination and the MSM act bewildered and wonder why? WTF! Now even Michell Malkin can add her voice on ABC as someone who should be heard! Disgusting!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (August 02, 2009 9:30 pm ET)
            3  
            congero, Beautifully said and absolutely 100% correct.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by kfraz43 (August 02, 2009 1:56 am ET)
      2  
      At least she's putting multiple speculations together to come up with a crippled premise. I guess that's evolution...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by elephty (August 02, 2009 6:02 am ET)
      9 1
      Malkin's role in the Republican Party is to advance misinformation and extremist views to see how they run. Do they have legs? What was it about a certain idea that resonated with many of the public? By having her extremist BS spread among the public it helps make other anti-American pro-fascist propaganda seem less unreasonable.

      To summarize, if Malkin's layer of BS cannot be true, the next layer of BS must be true, or is probably true. Her buffoonery blazes paths, and is the reason for her usefulness to the lizard brains and the greedy. Selfishness is only the desire to keep what one owns. Greed is when one wants what others have as well, and it comes with an encyclopedia of ready excuses for ignoring common decency.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (August 02, 2009 11:04 am ET)
        6 1
        I think you've nailed it. Is there any doubt that these Talk Radio Troglodytes are dancing on GOP strings?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (August 02, 2009 11:54 am ET)
      7 1
      Malicious Malkontent is a slithering pit viper who needs to be tossed back into the gutter that she crawled out of and as quickly as possible.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jcalton (August 02, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
      12  
      Michelle Malkin claims that first lady Michelle Obama "was literally born into the Chicago political corruptocracy,"
      Anyone who writes a book (ergo, literary) and doesn't understand what "literally" means should be ignored.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 03, 2009 2:49 am ET)
        5  
        OK, Jcalton, you made me lol. "Literally" is abused as much as the word "fact" by right wing screechers, all part of the hypnosis, convincing the brain-dead that the goofy opinions they're hearing are the truth.

        If you ever listen to Sean Hannity's radio show, you'll hear torture inflicted on the word "literally" that would be considered inhumane even by those who think waterboarding is funny.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Buzzramjet (August 02, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
      6 1
      Malkin lies and distorts.

      What a surprise.......not.

      She is typical of almost every con out there. Character assassin, lies, half truths, etc.

      Yep, all in a day's lie for Malkin.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Big Dan (August 02, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
           
        Flashback: Tweety owns Malkin, for insinuating John Kerry purposely shot himself in Vietnam:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoM90bAsr1M&feature=player_embedded
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Big Dan (August 02, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
        1  
        How about when she quoted Vaclav Klaus to "debunk" Al Gore's Nobel Prize on global warming:

        http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/just-when-you-thought-al-gore%E2%80%99s-head-couldn%E2%80%99t-get-any-bigger-part-ii/?print=1

        Do you know how bad it is, when you're searching for someone "famous" to back you up, and you can only come up with VACLAV KLAUS from Czechoslovakia??? That means, that's the best reputable person in her corner that she could find! And he isn't reputable, read below.

        The bastion of truth, expert on global warming: VACLAV KLAUS!!!

        Now, don't get your Czech Republic presidents named "VACLAV" mixed up, Michelle! Because the Czech's FIRST president's name was also "VACLAV"! VACLAV HAVEL! And if your finger which you used on your mouse to google VACLAV KLAUS is still working, you will find that Vaclav Havel had your Global Warming "expert" VACLAV KLAUS of being a "capitalist gangster":

        "Czech President Václav Havel publicly referred to Klaus' economic policies as "gangster capitalism" and blamed the prime minister for perceived corruption surrounding his policy of voucher privatization and his côterie of close allies such as the dentist, politician, and entrepreneur Miroslav Macec or StB honcho Václav Junek. Havel profited from the sale of his restituted properties, including a ballroom in downtown Prague, so his critics call him one of the major profiteers of the new gangster capitalism which he had decried."

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%83%C2%A1clav_Klaus

        Good thing Malkin didn't quote the wrong president of Czechoslovakia named VACLAV!!!

        That Czech presidents seem to be named VACLAV...that's another subject!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shellouise (August 02, 2009 5:48 pm ET)
         
      Its difficult to believe that people do not know the meaning of the word "racist". Simply put, and from the dictionary, it is:

      the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (August 02, 2009 6:46 pm ET)
      2  
      Michelle has a full-on fail response to MMFA at her blog right after she accuses Bill Maher of not taking on the "facts" in her book. Hilarious. Look for the pic of Bill Maher and enjoy a good laugh.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by roxsteady11180 (August 02, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
      7  
      Malkin is a pan faced, bug eyed, ingornat, war baby. As for minorities not being racist, what would you call her pointofview? You're clearly an idiot too! Nice try! She got smacked down on This Week this morning. No mention of her book after the initial introduction. Does she really think she's fooling anyone! She's just jealous of Michelle Obama. Her husband is the President of the United States and Merkin, that's right, not a typo, Merkin is a rightwing loony! What's the matter Merkin? Jealous much? Where is your husband and what does he do?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by roxsteady11180 (August 02, 2009 8:02 pm ET)
      5  
      As an African American female I can tell you that while, I wasn't raised that way, I know many African Americans who are racist. They hate white people so those of you who say it's not possible are either ignorant or misinformed. As for the Gates issue, like Obama said he doesnt' know if race played a role. He was simply trying to explain why Gates may have thought he was being profiled. What many of you don't seem to get is that what has upset many people including African Americans is that regardless of whether race played a part or not, NO ONE HAS EXPLAINED WHY ANY MAN COULD BE ARRESTED IN HIS OWN HOME WHEN NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED? Yelling, or even cursing at the police IS NOT AGAINST THE LAW! Did any of you know that the African American officer who was there on the scene has said that he would not have maid that arrest. What I'd like to know as I'm sure Gates' lawyer would is why not? Is it because he knew it was illegal or because it was unnecessary? The only person who may have broken a law was Crowley. He could still be sured for false arrest. Judge Napolitano was on some show on faux news and said that the police violated Gates' Fourth Amendment Rights. Have you ever seen groups of people protesting where police are trying to get them to disburse and the protestors are screaming at the polce? Do police arrest these protestors for yelling? Or do they wait for someone to charge at them, or throw something before that person is cuffed and arrested? Respect is a 2 way street. Try to get your facts and the law straight before you start typing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shoes89 (August 02, 2009 8:54 pm ET)
        8
      A pretty weak attempt by MM.

      If MM couldn't find anything substantial (and they didn't), they should have just let this one go.

      Pretty lame, MM, IMHO. Pretty lame.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (August 02, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
        5  
        Yep. A weak attempt by Michelle Malkin and her staff, indeed. She had nothing substantial in her book and clearly didn't read the Michelle Obama biography.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by OOzinEvil (August 02, 2009 10:04 pm ET)
            1
          Nice try.
          As for,
          She had nothing substantial in her book
          I doubt you read it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tman418 (August 03, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
            1  
            I doubt you read Media Matters' critique.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by OOzinEvil (August 03, 2009 11:28 pm ET)
                 
              As a matter of fact, I did read MM's critique and as of now, if the best they can come up with to discredit Malkin is, "Michelle Obama's salery did not triple after her husband became Senator". They are ara at a loss.
              Media Matters claims that "Vice Presidents" of hospitals earn what she made. Unfortunately, Michelle Obama didn't have a medical or law degree when she was appointed "vice president for community and external affairs", (such an important position, they never bothered to fill it after she left).
              Stick to easier battles, you can't win this one.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (August 02, 2009 10:11 pm ET)
        4  
        Yep. I agree. Weak attempt by Michelle Malkin. Good work, Shoes.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (August 02, 2009 11:49 pm ET)
        2  
        Lame? Hilarious and like Michelle Malkin herself, you fail to back up your claim. Here's Michelle's hilarious and ridiculous response to MMFA.

        Here’s another pathetic attempt to “debunk” Culture of Corruption from the lavishly-funded operatives at Media Matters, who claim I “distorted” Liza Mundy’s biograpy of Michelle Obama because — gasp! — I didn’t mention in my book that Mrs. Obama’s father had multiple sclerosis.

        The Media Matters crew tosses out various ad hominems and non sequiturs, but fails to refute my fundamental point: Michelle Robinson Obama was literally born into the Daley patronage machine and political corruptocracy. She worked for that machine, followed Daley legal counsel Valerie Jarrett to the University of Chicago Medical Center, saw her salary triple after her husband won his Senate seat, and brought Jarrett and other Daley intimates into the East Wing. The nutroots defend Mrs. O by citing her “cynicism” of machine politics.

        Well, yes. She’s very good at expressing “cynicism” and disdain for the dance partners who brought her to power. It’s the Obama Way.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 11:02 am ET)
        1  
        Another drive-by and another miss by shoes. Nothing to say and nothing to add to the conversation except "weak"!?!? If you had an argument you would have presented it, in other words...weak!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (August 03, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
        1  
        Shoes: maybe if you actually read the articles before you post, your own posts won't be so weak.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (August 03, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
          1  
          Geek,
          You are wrong..Shoes could literally write the article and still not be able to defend it..he would argue against it.
          You can't be weak to do that. You need to be all-over or scatter brained.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (August 03, 2009 10:57 am ET)
         
      I do believe in freedom of speech . .

      But why is this woman given airtime any any network to sell her disgusting, uncorroborated HATEFILLED books!!

      Why doesn't she just buy airtime to sell her books? Is there anyone who doesn't believe she's an inhumane, racist?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by janboule (August 03, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
        1  
        Michelle Malkin is one of these writers who would write something, anything to remain in the literary lime light.... anything, even reaching an all time calomnious new low to remind people that she is, after all, immigrant who, had she not been granted a US visa, would have never been in this country to lay lies and defamation on paper, not only on elected officials, but also on those who have known life in camps....

        I just don't want to waste my energy at researching what Ms. Malkin did to first of all, obtain a US resident visa, second, to manage attending a prestigious law school, to become an under rater lawyer....

        At least she can express herself through a pencil, too bad she is using one of her most remarkable qualities, (the art of telling lies) to show off her writing skills...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (August 03, 2009 2:25 pm ET)
      1  
      The right wing nutz make a big deal out of any perceived cheating on taxes.

      Cheating on wives, however, is so common it isn't even worth commenting on...

      Take a look at today's (Aug. 3, 2009) Doonesbury - priceless!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (August 03, 2009 6:31 pm ET)
         
      The Chicago political machine didn't really employ African Americans, at least as far as the "politics" goes in the machine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GDU3rd (August 03, 2009 10:16 pm ET)
         
      If it is packed with enough lies, I wonder if Ms. Obama can sue? I wonder if Ms. Obama would sue?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (August 04, 2009 3:25 am ET)
      1  
      Malkin is a downright sick individual. She is trying to defame an individual who worked hard to put his children through school while fighting a degenerative disease. What sick, twisted person would do such a thing? Is she trying to outbitch Coulter? If this is what a good Christian conservative is supposed to be like I'll forever be a raging atheist liberal because this is just disturbing. As a Chicagoan I see her pathetic attempts to understand our world as an outsider. It takes empathy, a bad word nowadays to most conservatives, to understand the environment he had to raise his children in. If we just take simplistic black and white thoughts to complex situations you get a bunch of Coulters, Hannitys and Malkins who don't take the time to understand someone else's reality and just place their own experiences as the one and only point of view.
      Sad
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.