About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring D.C. rally, Matthews claims "there's no public demonstration of support" for health reform

August 03, 2009 1:10 pm ET — 97 Comments

Asserting that "[w]hen somebody wants something, they fill the streets of Washington," Hardball host Chris Matthews falsely claimed that "[t]here's no public demonstration of support for health care" since President Obama was elected. In fact, thousands of supporters of health care reform reportedly rallied in Washington, D.C., on June 25.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Matthews claimed supporters of health care reform are not "marching in the streets"

From the July 31 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: August is nearly here, and there's still no health care bill. President Obama acts like there's an urgency to getting this done, but why isn't anybody else acting that way? Where are the people marching in the streets? The streets are empty in this town. If they really want it, where are they?

Ron Brownstein's political director for Atlantic Media and Susan Page is the Washington bureau chief for USA Today.

I do not want to knock health care. I believe this country needs a health care plan for everybody, especially the uninsured, but the streets are empty. People have disabled people come here; gay rights people come here; antiwar people come here; pro-life people come here. When somebody wants something, they fill the streets of Washington.

Susan Page, the streets are empty.

PAGE: Well, but, you know, the August deadline was a political deadline for Barack Obama.

MATTHEWS: But where are the people since January, since this president was elected? There's no public demonstration of support for health care.

HCAN health care rally on June 25 reportedly drew "thousands"

HCAN hosted a rally at the Capitol on June 25 "in support of quality, affordable health care for all." According to the event schedule, the Health Care for America Now rally featured several speakers, including actress "Edie Falco, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), HCAN Campaign Manager Richard Kirsch, CWA President Larry Cohen, AFSCME President Jerry McEntee, SEIU Secretary Treasurer Anna Burger, Governor Howard Dean, Congressman [Xavier] Becerra (D-CA), National Physicians Alliance President-Elect Valerie Arkoosh and other leading Members of Congress and Senators." HCAN estimated that more than 10,000 people came to the rally.

New York Times and McClatchy reported that "thousands" attended the HCAN rally.

The New York Times reported on June 25:

While senators haggled over the intricacies of policy, thousands of people held a rally in a park nearby demanding "health care reform now." The crowd included doctors, nurses, labor union leaders and people without insurance. Many urged Congress to create a public health insurance plan, as a possible alternative to private insurance.

McClatchy reported on June 25:

Thousands of their constituents rallied outside the Capitol to show their support for change, and the Obama administration called for action.

[...]

In a lively rally in a park one block from the Capitol, unions, community groups and liberal organizations rallied behind the White House effort.

They weren't talking specifics, just change.

"I traveled through the health care system, and there are some holes," said actress Edie Falco, a breast cancer survivor. "My hope is this country can finally provide affordable health care."

HCAN documented the event with photos posted online.

From HCAN's Flickr photostream:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by bilbo_dies (August 03, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
      2 1
      Matthews claims "[t]here's no public demonstration of support" for health reform

      As defined by Republican pundits.

      Besides we are a center right country (not)
      The right lives in areas with more acreage than the left.
      (on, and on, etc)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mustardman (August 03, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
        3 2
        Once again Mathews swings and misses. Why is it always the old white guys who are so wrong these days. Dobbs and now Mattews to name a few.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 03, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
          3 2
          Yeah, but apparently it's all them scary minorities that we have to lower the standards for.

          Let's not forget: Beck (no degree), Hannity (no degree), Limbaugh (no degree), Rove (no degree), Savage, Coulter (old white guy), Cunningham (no degree), Buchanan, O'Rielly, Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, McCain...

          The list of stupid white guys seems to know no end on the republican side of things. Thank god (for them) that they've embraced diversity and are now bolsted by such mental giants as... Michelle Malkin, Clarence Thomas, Michael Steel, Alan Keyes... oh... wait a sec...

          I mean: COLIN POWELL... oh... wait a sec...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
            1 5
            Apparently race-baiting isn't really a mantra that the conservatives have a monopoly on, eh?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 03, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
              4 2
              HAHAHA. You got me? I could say, "Guilty as charged"
              -or-
              I could point out that the use of irony in making a satirical critique is not the same as hypocrisy.

              Besides - I didn't make a single racist statement. I called out STUPIDITY, and what's more I did so in a way that shows that it knows no racial boundaries. Believe me: There's more than enough stupid to go around for both geneders & races, all sexual orientations, all religions and non-religions and yes, even every political point of view.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
                2 4
                FWIW, I didn't call you a racist and don't think you are one, but I think race-baiting is different.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 04, 2009 7:48 am ET)
                     
                  Okaaay... Fair enough, I may have misinterpreted what you said/meant. I guess I'm not sure how race-bating is somehow not inherently racist, but please let me know what you meant.

                  BUT, again, I'm not sure I see how I'm race-bating here.. I agreed that there's a lot of stupid white guys (and even added to the list) and went onto to give examples of a bunch of stupid black guys (in there ranks)as well. Stills seems to me that I either stupid-bating or republican-bating. (Or man-bating, as my inclusion of Ann Coulter hardly add much to the gender diversity there, but still...)

                  Please clarify.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by conservtheconst (August 03, 2009 5:19 pm ET)
            1 2
            Bush went to Yale and Harvard just like Obama. Just becuase you went to college doesn't make you smart. On the other hand, just becuase you didn't go to college doesn't make you stupid.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (August 04, 2009 1:27 am ET)
        4  
        Attention all that see this and care about their country...

        Go to at least one town hall meeting where a Democrat is speaking, but days before the event, call and demand that your local government and/or authorities make it mandatory that anyone that wants to attend the public and very democratic gathering/meeting between your elected officials and you, their constituents must have either:

        a) a valid ID that proves that the person attending is actually a resident of said district or town or what have you

        b) a bill with their name on it that proves residency

        As far as I'm concerned... any punk-ass right-wing blowhard that wants to speak their line of corporate crap can do so all they want... they simply must be from the area!

        FYI: Don't think for one second that the right-wing crazies are not going out of their way to bus people in from other states.

        As Thom Hartmann says all the time... Tag! We are all it!

        Go out and get active! Because rest assured, the right-wing is!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (August 04, 2009 10:31 am ET)
            1
          You mean now that the right has picked up and actually used a tried and true LEFT WING tactic, it's bad?

          Do you have any proof that this is happening? I think the Republicans are so out of sorts now that they can't possibly be this organized. Or so MMfA keeps telling me.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
      2 11
      Two observations:

      1. Matthews talked about "filling the streets". MMFA is referencing a rally in a park. I think Matthews has a point.

      2. Here is a partial list of the organizations who make up HCAN. (I got this from their website.)

      Our Steering Committee includes: ACORN, AFL-CIO, AFSCME, AFT, Americans United for Change, Campaign for America’s Future, Center for American Progress Action Fund, Campaign for Community Change, Children’s Defense Fund Action Council, Communications Workers of America, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), MoveOn.org, NAACP, National Council of La Raza, National Education Association, National Women’s Law Center, SEIU, UFCW, USAction, Women's Voices, Women's Vote and Working America.

      As you can see it is coalition of liberal and far right activist groups and unions. One might reasonably surmise that they called out their members for this rally in the park.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
        2 13
        oops.. I meant it is a coalition of liberal and far left activist groups and unions. Sorry for the confusion.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (August 03, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
          10 2
          Yes, you are confused because none of those organizations are 'far left' or 'liberal'...at least by anyone who lives in reality. But, since you teabagging terrorist hicks hate 75% of Americans and have no concept of reality, of course you believe they are "far left" and "liberal".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
            2 9
            Hahaha... Earth to Harley...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (August 03, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
              9 1
              Which ones are radical leftists groups? None of them...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
                1 9
                Start with the first one.

                Oh.. why are you trying to misstate what I wrote. I said "far left activist" not "radical leftist".

                If you think ACORN is not far left, then we simply disagree.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
                  4 1
                  ACORN is made up of American citizens volunteer and paid that promote policies and programs to help lower income people, I"am one of them. Your labeling them far-left is really to laugh at since their programs range from support for healthcare reform, to immigration law reform, fair housing and mortgage relief, job training and retraining to name some. American citizens taking an active part in changing their lives and concern for their neighbor. You seem to fear activism by poor and colored people, no surprise as I pointed out your affection for Tail Gunner Joe, but very hyprocritical presenting your views as that of AA while denying the legitmacy of the problems and concerns of the Americans in ACORN,NCLA, NAACP,womens and union groups and all you've labeled as far left. Who the hell do you think you are, you pompous arse!
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
                1 6
                Mags, ACORN let me help you out with proof.

                http://www.acorncracked.com

                Virtually every website connected to ACORN claims the organization is "non-partisan." That's difficult to swallow, given its efforts.

                Truth be told, ACORN can honestly claim to be a bi-partisan organization. In addition to working to elect Democrats to office, ACORN was honored by the Communist Party USA for its "critical but generally unrecognized role of organized labor and grassroots voter registration efforts in winning Ohio for Barack Obama." The AFL-CIO was also honored as an "unsung hero" of the 2008 election in Ohio

                ACORN has a core of paid staffers that drift around the country to work in swing states. When we saw an ACORN staffer, Johanna Sharrard, in a YouTube video, we wondered who she was and why she was speaking on behalf of the organization.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
                  8 1
                  That's right, mark, registering people to vote is BAD.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Ward_Off_Monkey (August 03, 2009 8:55 pm ET)
                    1 2
                    Heh. Registering them more than once is. So is registering imaginary citizens as well as non-citizens.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (August 04, 2009 10:43 am ET)
                      2  
                      And how many of these imaginary citizens and non-citizens actually voted?

                      (hint - the number is between zero and zero)
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
                  3 1
                  You are soo full of it!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 5:18 pm ET)
                  4 1
                  MArk you are a kook. Hahaha acorncracked website???? Are you serious!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by conservtheconst (August 03, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
                    6
                  I love how you can give facts and ACTUAL associations with ACORN and the left and all they can say is "That's right, mark, registering people to vote is BAD".

                  Where is proof that ACORN is bi-partisan? What Republican candidates have they ever endorsed? What Conservative bill have they tried to get passed by spreading the word?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 6:48 pm ET)
                    4  
                    When Republican canidates speak to issues they support they will. I see no hyprocrisy there! Please point it out!
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 6:56 pm ET)
                    6  
                    ACORN doesn't pass out voter guides like your local megachurch preacher does.

                    They REGISTER people. That's it. If these people vote overwhelming Democrat, well, then who's fault is that?
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by ConstanceRifleII (August 03, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
                  6 1
                  Wow...That's a stunning website, HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT ACORN BEFORE! WHY DID NO ONE TELL ME! AHHHHH!

                  Look Mark, let me let you in on a little secret. ACORN registered voters. Not Democratic voters. Voters. And they registered them, and got paid by how many they registered. So yeah, Mickey Mouse might have been registered to vote in Ohio, but did he show up at the polls?

                  Oh nevermind, you're right, Obama's jack-booted Islamo-nazi thugs secretly run everything. Careful what you say on the intertubes here though, Next thing you know they're gonna break your door down in the middle of the night and take your whole family off to those FEMA concentration camps.

                  Now THESE guys (hint, there's a link in "THESE"), they're just innocent Christian bystanders who just want what's good for the nation. And by innocent, I mean they can rape children and feel no remorse. So to them, and to Doug Coe, they're innocent.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne1 (August 03, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                    6  
                    Oh, oh.....this author was on Bill Maher. His name is Jeff Sharlet and he lived at this house under cover. He has a book about "The Family", and man are those dudes super creepy.

                    http://jeffsharlet.com/
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
                      4  
                      And super scary, because they're GOVERNING based on not just religions beliefs, but FALSE religious beliefs.

                      They seem to have a God complex. Truly scary. I think I'm going to pick up his book.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by Tbone Slickens (August 04, 2009 10:33 am ET)
                  2
                La RAZZZZZZZAAAAAAA
                Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (August 03, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
          6 2
          So, your point is that this should be ignored because the turnout was smaller than "filling the streets" (however that is defined)
          I guess that means all the tea parties should be ignored too, since there turnout was pretty sparse.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
            1 3
            Yeah, if by "sparse" you mean about 100k, or 10 times this rally.

            FWIW I think Matthews's gauge for support of health care reform is pretty odd and abstract and not adequate.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
              2 2
              wow..your right those teabagger parties were huge. they got 100k people to show up all across the U.S. out of 400 million. what a huge grassroots movement that was. i guess all you need for popular support is .00025 % of the population..lol
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
                1 4
                What am I right about again??? Did I write "the teabag parties were HUGE!!!"? No. Did I write "all you need for popular support is .00025% of the population?" No.

                Fail.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
                  2  
                  well, you decided to compare the teabagging to the health care rally. by doing so you implied that somehow the teabagging had popular support that the heath care rally did not. gues if you don't want confusion you should not try to compare to completely differnt thing.

                  epic fail
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
                    1 5
                    I didn't compare them, I was addressing the comparison by another poster. And I didn't imply, but it's a FACT that the teabag rallies as a whole had many more participants than this single rally, which was cited by MMfA.

                    Uber-double-epic-fail, YSAPGKY, etc.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Considering the teabag rallies were sponsors and promoted by lobbyists and the right-wing media, it's not surprising that a collective false outrage would occur.
                      Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
            1 5
            Bilbo,

            No. Anyone on the left or right (or wherever it is Harley feels he is at), are free to lawfully rally or protest in the capital or anywhere else they desire.

            My point was that MMFA's example even though true, was pretty comical.

            One rally in a park over a month ago by a coalition of leftist groups, unions, and other special interests loyal to the Democratic Party and Obama serves to make Matthews point rather than refute it.

            Nice attempt at deflection. I didn't keep up with the Tea Parties so I have no idea how many turned out. But their turnout really has nothing to do with this issue.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bilbo_dies (August 03, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
              2 1
              And, I believe the point was that Matthews claim of "no public demonstration of support" was obviously wrong.
              Also, it was not meant as "deflection". I was pointing out that if the justification of support or not was "filling the streets" then the tea parties didn't meet this definition either.

              Personally I think the free expression of our opinions is one of the things we need to celebrate. Of course, I also think we need to tone it down a notch too. (notice the inclusive, I don't single out left or right) The newest way of expressing ourselves thru "disruption" of town hall events, IMHO, in order to get "our" point heard, is wrong and does nothing to help foster public debate in anyway.

              Of course, I also to do not expect much out of any talking head or pundit that I see or hear in the media.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
                  4
                bilbo,

                I agree that Matthews is wrong about a public demonstration. Last time I watched him was during the elections. He and Olbermann looked rather comical.

                My point was that since Matthews was not talking about Tea Parties, it doesn't matter if they meet this definition or not. It is immaterial.

                I agree with you about free expression of our opinions. It would be nice if both sides would tone it down. But doing so is like catching smoke.

                Leftist groups, ranging from ACORN to environmental groups to anti-war demonstrations, has a long history of disrupting meetings. Although I do not agree with disruptions, I find it laughable that all of the sudden those on the left object when the same tactics are used to object to this radical restructuring and government control of our health industry.

                I'm of the opinion that Obama and Pelosi and Reid have stirred up the right with his leftist agenda and you'll be seeing a lot more of these types of demonstrations... that is, if the politicians have enough nerve to have any more town hall meetings this month.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bilbo_dies (August 03, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
                  3  
                  We could go on like this over and over and not get anywhere. By talking about leftist groups, you denigrate those same groups, since you obviously think there is a problem there, or at least infer it.


                  I don't try to look at any politicians actions as leftist or rightist but; rather try to look at the consequences. You can talk about Pelosi, etc stirring up the right or whatever (whether I agree with them or not) but; they are just indulging in more of the same, per the standard set by the previous administration. By stating "will they did it" doesn't make it right but; since the dems tend to not be as organized as the repubs, it tends to be one or two (sometimes more) people who are acting out on their own, not a group of people with a written agenda on how to disrupt the meeting. If you think that is the best way to "get your point across" to the politicians, I feel for you. I feel it is wrong (no matter who partakes) and does not engender positive change.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
                      6
                    bilbo,

                    Talking about leftist groups does not denigrate them in any way any more than talking about rightist groups denigrate them.

                    I find it laughable that you consider the dems to be not as organized as the Repubs.

                    Apparently you have not read any of the ACORN memos or Saul Alinsky's book regarding organized disruption.

                    The supposed memo in questions by Bob MacGuffie is unsubstantiated and produced by a far leftist, agenda driven organization.

                    Where do you see that I support any type of disruption. Why you would claim so in a response where I said "...I do not agree with disruptions..." seems a bit disingenuous on your part and a straw man argument.

                    Thanks for feeling sorry for me, but you can save your pity.

                    I suggest you take the time to learn more about Alinsky and ACORN before asserting those on the left are beyond committing their own disruptive acts.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (August 03, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
              3  
              Umm, you seem to forget the part in the Constitution of freedom of assembly. We are indeed free to rally and or protest where we want.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
                  6
                Where do you get the idea I forgot?

                Oh and thanks for stating the obvious about freedom of assembly.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
          1  
          In other words Americans!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (August 03, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
        5 1
        Matthews talked about "filling the streets". MMFA is referencing a rally in a park. I think Matthews has a point.
        Are you really THIS stupid? .....channeling Tommy. Desperate. Lame. Laughable. Ouch.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
          1 4
          Wow you woke up angry today. Time to back off all-night D&D games.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (August 03, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
        5 1
        MATTHEWS: But where are the people since January, since this president was elected? There's no public demonstration of support for health care.
        Hick, you seemed to miss this quote. Pwned. Idiot.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
        2  
        Your labeling them as liberal and activist groups. Does not negate them from being part of the American people. It sounds pretty broad based to me. Far right? You must mean left, but I'll consider the source since you argued back in April that Joe McCarthy was on to something and asked for proof that he ruined peoples lives. Regardless,activism is not unamerican, nor is belonging to a trade union, a womens organization ,one fighting for equality, or being a liberal. What they are, are the many different faces of Americans, your supposed expose does nothing but prove how narrow minded and out of touch with Americans you are!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
          1  
          The above reply about liberal and activist groups is in response to AA's.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (August 03, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
      2  
      Mr. Matthews, while wrong on this subject, does bring to my mind a good idea. After all the tea bagging birthers are done with disrupting town halls all over this country, and hopefully getting pointed out and laughed at, let's go to D.C.

      The day Congress returns to go back to work after the summer recess, let all those who support health coverage reform show up as well, demanding to be heard, and demanding the changes that will save health care for everyone, rich and poor alike.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
          5
        Cat, are you saying we are not allowed to show up at these townhall meetings and ask questions?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by The_Cat (August 03, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
          3  
          Not a bit of it. I'm saying the town halls are likely to be a waste of time, with the right intent on showing up and attempting to disrupt them.

          Of course, I'm also saying several million Americans in the Washington Mall chanting for health coverage reform would have a significant impact, especially if it happened on the day when Congress returned to resume work.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
          7  
          Mark asking questions is one thing disrupting meetings is another. Funny how this just showing up asking questions fits this strategy outline a week ago : This morning, Politico reported that Democratic members of Congress are increasingly being harassed by “angry, sign-carrying mobs and disruptive behavior” at local town halls. For example, in one incident, right-wing protesters surrounded Rep. Tim Bishop (D-NY) and forced police officers to have to escort him to his car for safety.

          This growing phenomenon is often marked by violence and absurdity. Recently, right-wing demonstrators hung Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) in effigy outside of his office. Missing from the reporting of these stories is the fact that much of these protests are coordinated by public relations firms and lobbyists who have a stake in opposing President Obama’s reforms.

          The lobbyist-run groups Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, which orchestrated the anti-Obama tea parties earlier this year, are now pursuing an aggressive strategy to create an image of mass public opposition to health care and clean energy reform. A leaked memo from Bob MacGuffie, a volunteer with the FreedomWorks website Tea Party Patriots, details how members should be infiltrating town halls and harassing Democratic members of Congress:




          – Artificially Inflate Your Numbers: “Spread out in the hall and try to be in the front half. The objective is to put the Rep on the defensive with your questions and follow-up. The Rep should be made to feel that a majority, and if not, a significant portion of at least the audience, opposes the socialist agenda of Washington.”

          – Be Disruptive Early And Often: “You need to rock-the-boat early in the Rep’s presentation, Watch for an opportunity to yell out and challenge the Rep’s statements early.”

          – Try To “Rattle Him,” Not Have An Intelligent Debate: “The goal is to rattle him, get him off his prepared script and agenda. If he says something outrageous, stand up and shout out and sit right back down. Look for these opportunities before he even takes questions.”

          The memo above also resembles the talking points being distributed by FreedomWorks for pushing an anti-health reform assault all summer. Patients United, a front group maintained by Americans for Prosperity, is currently busing people all over the country for more protests against Democratic members. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), chairman of the NRCC, has endorsed the strategy, telling the Politico the days of civil town halls are now “over.”

          Meanwhile, AHIP, the trade group and lobbying juggernaut representing the health insurance industry is sending staffers to monitor town halls and other right-wing front groups are stepping up their ad campaign to smear reform efforts. The strategy for defeating reform — recently outlined by an influential lobbyist to the Hill newspaper as “delay” then “kill” — is becoming apparent. By delaying a vote until after the August recess, lobbyists are now seizing upon recess town halls as opportunities to ambush lawmakers and fool them into believing there is wide opposition to reform.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
              2
            conger,

            Do you have a link? Thanks.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
              4  
              Go to the source the article is sited Politico,I picked up from ThinkProgress.org. : http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/31/recess-harassment-memo/
              Report Abuse
              • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
                  4
                Conger,

                Think Progress, doesn't seem to have any proof that this guy wrote this memo. All TP has is innuendo and assumption. It doesn’t appear that the person that supposedly wrote the memo is an employee of FreedomWorks nor is FreedomWorks mentioned in any way in the supposedly leaked memo.

                Also the supposedly leaked memo bears no similarity in style or graphics to the FreedomWorks activism packet that Think Progress is using as a comparison.

                I could find no proof offered by Think Progress that this is a actually a leaked memo from this person or organization.

                If you like take a look at this blog pointing this out:
                http://www.stoptheaclu.com/

                Can you find any link that proves this guy Bob actually wrote the memo, so that you might convince a skeptic?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bilbo_dies (August 03, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
                  5  
                  So that memo is as valid as the Kenyan birth certificate, at least by your standard?

                  Sorry, couldn't help myself, and no (like the birthers) I do not believe that you have an open enough mind to be convinced of anything that you do not currently believe in.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by anotheramerican (August 03, 2009 5:27 pm ET)
                      5
                    Hahaha.. Hey wrong again.

                    I have said before I think Obama is an American citizen. Even though we haven't seen the actual long form birth certificate, I think the birthers look foolish pressing this issue.

                    You seem to have a rather low opinion of me. Get in line. :-)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by ConstanceRifleII (August 03, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
                      3  
                      "Even though we haven't seen the actual long form birth certificate,"

                      Good clarification there. You could add "And even though his grandmother said she witnessed him born in Kenya, and even though a Kenyan birth certificate has been found, and even though he won't address the issue..."
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
                        2  
                        You have nerve to post the already debunked Kenyan Birth certificate on this site,and bring up the debunked grandmother thingy. One word for you: FOOL!
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (August 04, 2009 2:41 am ET)
                        2  
                        Sorry dbeden I missed your sarcasm and regret my calling you a fool, for that I'am deeply sorry.Please accept my sincerest apologies!
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Did you go to Politico that was the source of the article! Your too funny! No amount of proof is enough for you. You didn't inquire with TP you just read an article from a rightwing website and tried to pass it on as convincing. If you were really serious about finding sources instead of trying to deny you would have went to the source I said the article came from POLITICO, but then I don't expect honesty from a person who tried to justify Tail Gunner Joe MCCarthy's witchhunt.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
                  2  
                  More proof your full it and your research and couldn't find proof as if you looked : Did you check this out too? "...The memo above also resembles the talking points being distributed by FreedomWorks for pushing an anti-health reform assault all summer. Patients United, a front group maintained by Americans for Prosperity, is currently busing people all over the country for more protests against Democratic members. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), chairman of the NRCC, has endorsed the strategy, telling the Politico the days of civil town halls are now “over.”.." So did POLITICO misquote Sen. Sessions?
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
              5
            Congo, what I find more funny is that now that others are using the tactics you on the left have used for years you do not like it. I have seen these videos, and they look like people asking questions and Reps unable to answer. Yes some are disruptive, but how well. I remember in the past many individuals from Code Pink being disruptive at meetings, but guess they are ok since I never really saw someone like you condemning them here.

            Please there is no proof of your insurance group claim, you heard that on MSNBC, and they did not have proof either. Now that I see where you get your news not much you say can be accepted. If I remember correctly was Matthews not the new person that said he would do all he could to make this President successful?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
              3  
              The people behind these "disruptions" are bused in by LOBBYISTS for the HEALTH CARE VAMPIRES. They are armed with TALKING POINTS and disruption TACTICS and are being DUPED by the insurance behemoths who don't want their gravy train of profits derailed under the scare tactic that the so-called inept government beauracracy will ruin health care.

              Earth to mark - health care is on the road to ruin. You just haven't realized it yet.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
              3  
              Mark I sited where the articles came from. I found it on ThinkProgress and they got it from POLITICO, I have no doubt that you've heard it on MSNBC or read an article from one of your sites that said that... I see where you get your disinformation. I think it truly amazing that you would rejoice in people being bussed in by insurance companies and their front groups to disrupt public meetings discussing ways to reform healthcare. To spread out appear larger than you are, to rile up and put on the defensive,to be the counter-insurgency(due you deny Michelle Malkin said that?) and Sen. Sessions battle cry that the day of civil town halls are now over,you find this the same as code pink holding up a sign or shouting out in protest then be led away and arrested. Insurance companies using people to disrupt, not ask a question but to disrupt so that other could not be heard. Essentially to close down public gatherings discussing how to reform our healthcare system. To close down public discourse is what THEIR doing! How do you justify that?
              Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 03, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
      5  
      There need to be a lot more demonstrations like this. We need to take it to the streets (or parks) and demand a robust public healthcare option.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
          8
        Shaggles, good luck on that plan, seeing that a majority of folks in the U.S. do not back this current bill. Since yours and mine current reps refuse to be on the same plan, why do you think it is a good plan? How about when our civil servents agree to be on the same plan?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
          4  
          really, the majority don't support "this bill" ? could you provide a link please? i would like to see which bill they don't support. after all, is it one of the 3 in the house or one of the 2 in the senete? i keep hearing there is no support for the bill but there is no one bill yet. what people don't support is the distorted version of a mythical bill the right has made up from bits and pieces of proposed legislation.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
              2
            Peace, here are several links to help with your question. The bill is not finalized but the majority of the bill has been written, provided a link below for you to read. So I guess the committee voted on a mythical bill just before the break. Wow, think they can vote on unicorn saftey as well then???

            http://patientsunitednow.com/?q=node/233

            http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/19/AR2009071902176.html

            http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/07/obamas_healthcare_handling_sli.html

            http://www.gallup.com/poll/121814/more-disapprove-than-approve-obama-healthcare.aspx
            Report Abuse
            • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
              2  
              man, are you just trying to provoke a response or are you just that stupid? there is no final healthcare bill. there are competeing versions of it that will be negotiated and compromised on. from that they will come up with a final version. until then, everything is still on the table. but you guys on the right who can't form complex thought will never understand how these thing work.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
                  2
                So what did the committe vote on before the break? What we all know is that the bill that is currently posted is what they would like to pass, but many of us will protest to make sure it does not happen.

                No, we on the right do not accept everything this government puts out. You would be happy that Cap and Trade, Healthcare bill and other government spending bill pass. Peace, so when you are out of money with limited income, do you spend you way out, or do you cut your spending?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
                  3  
                  The MAJORITY of Americans of people are for MAJOR health care reform.

                  more Americans said it would be better to pass "major reform" to health care (55%) rather than "minor adjustments" (43%).

                  http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1913426,00.html

                  Make a note of it.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Appleboy (August 03, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
          3  
          I wonder how many would show up if they knew each of us pays about $6000 per year for health care compared to about $3000 in other rich countries who actually cover 100% of their citizens compared to about 80% for the US. And I wonder how many more would show up if they knew the quality of health care we receive is no better than in those other rich countries. We basically pay a $3000 "tax" on health care for which we get nothing in return.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
              5
            Apple, lets say your claim is correct, but you forget to add how much other countries take in taxes. I guess you would be ok with giving up half of your paycheck to the government? Next claim you make about others receiving better health care, I guess that is why a majority of other individuals come to the U.S. for cancer treatments, for heart health and other related medical care. So if you make a claim like that, I hope you have proof. I am sure you remember with Castro was sick, do you know he flew in a specialist from France to help him? If he had such great health care in Cuba, why fly in a specialist?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
              5  
              thats is an outright lie. the Majority of people do not come here from other countries to get treatment. some rich people do but nowhere near the majority. once again you show that the right will just make stuff up..lol
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bilbo_dies (August 03, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
              3  
              Understood that this is all circular arguments here. People come to the states for cutting edge treatment or treatment not allowed/found in their countries. People from the U.S. go to other countries for cutting edge treatment of treatment not allowed by insurance or found in their country.

              I have had this discussion(?) so much, it makes my head hurt.
              "These statistics show, etc"
              "Well, you can't trust those statistics."

              BTW where do you get your data for: a majority of other individuals come to the U.S. for cancer treatments, for heart health and other related medical care.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Appleboy (August 03, 2009 5:31 pm ET)
              5  
              Of course the $3000 that the French pay for health care is from taxes. Does it really matter? We fork over $6000 to insurance companies and the French fork over $3000 to the government. We get nothing in return for that extra $3000.

              Yes, our best health care might be the best in the world. But who can afford it? Those who come here for treatment are usually rich or are heads of state. Also, according to a 2008 Deloitte study, an estimated 6 million Americans will travel abroad for surgery. According to the report "Medical care in countries such as India, Thailand and Singapore can cost as little as 10 percent of the cost of comparable care in the United States". We have to stop thinking we have the best care in the world. It is absolutely false.

              Oh, and did I forget? We cover only 80% of our citizens.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (August 03, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
              1  
              Profits over People

              Put it on a bumper sticker and slap it on your car, mark.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 6:45 pm ET)
              3  
              Your argument makes absolutely no sense. We rank 37th in quality of care and #1 with cost. We cannot sustain the escalating cost of care. Where do you draw your allegations about the number of people coming here for treatment? These people disagree with you:http://stratosphear.ca/2009/07/26/33-7-million-canadians-are-not-shona-holmes/ , so does this whistleblower : http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/07/26-2 , and we won't fall for it again : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/24/AR2009072401876.html .. I don't understand how a specialist traveling to Cuba proves one system over another? France has socialized medicine so I'am confused as to what your trying to show,do you not think that different nations might be more advanced in research in certain fields than others, do you think one country has a monopoly of knowledge in all fields? Why do you think they have conferences to share research and knowledge? We rank 37th we could learn alot about controlling cost and improviing access especially from such a poor country as Cuba.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by LittleFuzzy (August 04, 2009 8:44 am ET)
              1  
              Mark:
              In Canada the percentage of gross pay retained by an employee is 82%. That is, the combined deductions for taxes, pension, employment insurance plus all employer deductions is 18%. That tax deduction pays for my health care and ALL other government services.

              In the US, the percentage retained is 81.9%. There is no universal healthcare in that - it is all taxes for other services.

              Who is getting better results from their investment in health care? I am speaking of the COST of the care, BTW.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by LittleFuzzy (August 04, 2009 8:46 am ET)
                1  
                Drat!

                Second para should read:
                In the US, the percentage retained is 81.9%. There is no universal health care in that deduction - it is all taxes for other services and employer deductions.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (August 03, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
          2  
          I'm not talking about any particular bill. Just a good public option. More people support that than don't.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (August 03, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
          1
        Meh. "To the parks!!!!" a a rallying cry doesn't have quite the same gusto to it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
        6
      I am sure these are all of the out of work auto workers whom were promised a job interview after the rally. Plus looking at these pictures I would say they were happy to have 1,000 people there, not sure who made the guess of the number, but that is not 10K. I wonder how much ACORN paid their folks to be there?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
        2  
        you have any proof at all that autoworkers were promised and interview? or that acorn paid anyone to be there? see, here's the problem. you folks on the right have a voice in your head that tells you something and you just believe it with no proof. your a good example to all our young people out there. so, kids, stay in scoll so you don't end up like this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
            3
          Peace, the problem you have is no humor. First yes many, many autoworkers are out of work, more so since Obama became president, hence the auto work comment. Second, Acorn has been show to pay individuals to show up for protest, hence the Acron comment. Three look at the pics, that is not 10K if it was true they would have had more aerial views.

          Peace, I agree kids should stay in School, not sure about Scoll.

          http://www.acorncracked.com/agenda_tactics.html

          So to the youth of America, go out earn your own living, do not wait on the government to ever take care of you. Read the Constitution, you may learn what the government real job is to do for us. .
          Report Abuse
          • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
            2  
            spoken like a true dittohead. i spelled scoll so you could read it. and your right about no humor. because there is never humor in what wingnuts say until they get called on it. then it's just a big joke.
            yes, acron may have paid people to do some things but you have no proof they did any such thing in this instance. all i can say is it's a good thing you live here in the u.s because if you were born in any other country you would have starved to death a long time ago.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
                2
              I am sure you did the Scoll thing, sure you did. FYI, do you have proof ACORN did not pay their folks, I am working off past history of proof. Peace keep reaching, thanks to idividuals like me you have unemployment to fall back onto.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
        2  
        Slander and lie when you have no proof your sad and sorry Mark Give it up if you have nothing factual to say> Your embarassing yourself!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (August 03, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
            2
          Congo, you should just go back to watching MSNBC, maybe you will get more lies the share here.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 03, 2009 7:00 pm ET)
          2  
          You haven't shown one lie that I made while I've pointed out numerous times how silly your post are! What is this MSNBC thing your on!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (August 03, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
      2  
      Well, Mr. Matthews has a history of misreading public opinion. Remember "Women love this war"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (August 04, 2009 1:27 am ET)
      3  
      Attention all that see this and care about their country...

      Go to at least one town hall meeting where a Democrat is speaking, but days before the event, call and demand that your local government and/or authorities make it mandatory that anyone that wants to attend the public and very democratic gathering/meeting between your elected officials and you, their constituents must have either:

      a) a valid ID that proves that the person attending is actually a resident of said district or town or what have you

      b) a bill with their name on it that proves residency

      As far as I'm concerned... any punk-ass right-wing blowhard that wants to speak their line of corporate crap can do so all they want... they simply must be from the area!

      FYI: Don't think for one second that the right-wing crazies are not going out of their way to bus people in from other states.

      As Thom Hartmann says all the time... Tag! We are all it!

      Go out and get active! Because rest assured, the right-wing is!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jcalton (August 04, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
         
      When did Chris Matthews become a douchebag? He used to be a regular talking head.

      "Where are the people marching in the streets?..
      [w]hen somebody wants something, they fill the streets of Washington,"
      Maybe they are too sick to march?

      If this were the criterion for action, how many people filled the streets demanding we go to war in Iraq? FISA, PATRIOT Act, privatizing social security, or any other really terrible idea that came out of the last administration/Congress...

      P.S. Now we have the internet, Chris, so everyone has a forum. This is like saying, "Is everyone in America sitting in darkness? People used to turn on the gaslights when the sun set, but they just don't care about illumination anymore. There, I proved it. QED."
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.