About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity offers plethora of town hall falsehoods to claim Dems are the ones "calling names"

August 12, 2009 9:50 am ET — 113 Comments

Asserting that "the Democrats" are the ones "yelling here and calling names," Sean Hannity claimed that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called health care town hall protesters "Nazis"; that Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer wrote "that they are un-American"; and that President Obama is "telling the American people to shut up." In fact, none of these claims is true.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Hannity repeatedly advanced false claim that Pelosi called protesters "Nazis"

Hannity: "[W]e've had hardworking Americans called Nazis and brownshirts and un-American by Nancy Pelosi." On August 11, as an example of "the host of insults the Democratic leaders have been hurling" at town hall protestors, Hannity stated: "Now, we've had hardworking Americans called Nazis and brownshirts and un-American by Nancy Pelosi." [Fox News' Hannity; 8/11/09]

Hannity: "[I]t's Nancy Pelosi attacking the American people, it's the Democrats comparing them to Nazis -- the Democrats are doing that." Hannity further said on August 11:

HANNITY: The only people, John, that are yelling here and calling names -- it's Obama telling the American people to shut up, it's Nancy Pelosi attacking the American people, it's the Democrats comparing them to Nazis -- the Democrats are doing that.

JOHN McWHORTER (Manhattan Institute senior fellow): Oh, yeah. I mean, I'll tell you honestly that I think a lot of the people who are yelling in these town hall meetings do have some problems with misinformation. But, nevertheless, it seems to me that back in my day, when I used to teach at UC Berkeley and the big debate was affirmative action, I saw people on the left acting in the same way with the same lack of manners, the same volume, the same misinformation. Now, it wasn't in the formal setting of a town meeting about a national policy -- same thing.

HANNITY: Wait a minute. What misinformation? What yelling? You know what I see? I see fathers with their kids in wheelchairs. I see veterans that are speaking. Is there passion? Yeah, there's passion. You know, maybe they don't have the --

McWHORTER: Yes.

HANNITY: So that -- but that's real passion.

McWHORTER: They do feel what they feel. Yeah.

HANNITY: Because they see their country's going bankrupt. They see that every promise that has been made has been broken, and they're being attacked and called Nazis by people that are supposed to be public servants. [Hannity; 8/11/09]

Pelosi actually said protesters were "carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on health care." Speaking to reporters, Pelosi was asked if she thought there was "legitimate grassroots opposition" at recent town hall events. She responded: "I think they're Astroturf; you be the judge. They're carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on health care."

Pelosi was right: Swastikas have appeared at town hall meetings. As Media Matters for America senior fellow Eric Boehlert and Fox News contributor Alan Colmes have noted, multiple protesters at health care reform protests have held signs featuring swastikas.

Media falsely assert Pelosi called or suggested that opponents of health reform are "Nazis." As Media Matters noted, conservative media figures including Joe Scarborough, Gregg Jarrett, Peggy Noonan, James Taranto, and Rush Limbaugh have similarly claimed Pelosi compared protesters to Nazis.

Hannity repeatedly falsely claimed Pelosi said protesters were "un-American"

From the August 11 edition of Hannity;

HANNITY: Nancy Pelosi said they had swastikas.

PENNY LEE (Democratic strategist): Again, America is great when we have --

HANNITY: Nancy Pelosi said they are un-American.

LEE: America is great -- America is great when we do have that public discourse and we have freedom of speech, and that is a wonderful thing.

HANNITY: Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Nancy Pelosi --

LEE: But shouting at each other --

HANNITY: Nancy Pelosi --

LEE: But shouting at each other similar to what you and I are doing right now, but is not --

HANNITY: Wait a minute. Nancy Pelosi is the speaker of the House, and she wrote with Steny Hoyer that they are un-American. I can't think of anything more quintessentially American. [Hannity, 8/11/09]

Pelosi, Hoyer actually wrote: "Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American"

From Pelosi and Hoyer's August 10 USA Today op-ed

[A]s members of Congress spend time at home during August, they are talking with their constituents about reform. The dialogue between elected representatives and constituents is at the heart of our democracy and plays an integral role in assuring that the legislation we write reflects the genuine needs and concerns of the people we represent.

However, it is now evident that an ugly campaign is underway not merely to misrepresent the health insurance reform legislation, but to disrupt public meetings and prevent members of Congress and constituents from conducting a civil dialogue. These tactics have included hanging in effigy one Democratic member of Congress in Maryland and protesters holding a sign displaying a tombstone with the name of another congressman in Texas, where protesters also shouted "Just say no!" drowning out those who wanted to hold a substantive discussion.

Let the facts be heard

These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views -- but of the facts themselves. Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.

Health care is complex. It touches every American life. It drives our economy. People must be allowed to learn the facts. [USA Today, 8/10/09]

Media have repeatedly claimed Pelosi and Hoyer called opponents "un-American." As Media Matters noted, numerous media figures including Chuck Todd, Brian Kilmeade, Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson, Greta Van Susteren, Lou Dobbs, Carl Cameron, and Glenn Beck have previously advanced this mischaracterization of the op-ed.

CNN contributor Louis debunks claim. After Dobbs claimed that "we also have now the leadership of the House saying you're un-American to oppose" health care reform, CNN contributor Errol Louis corrected him, stating that "the un-American part was, you know, to shout people down. To stop the conversation is un-American, which I would agree with." Louis continued: "[T]he words in the article were to shut down debate; to use those kind of disruptive tactics to try and stop the debate from going forward is wrong. It is just wrong. You call it un-American; you call it whatever you want. I mean, it needs to be denounced. You can't have people tarred and feathered in effigy outside of their congressional office or hung in effigy outside of their office. That's not the way to conduct this debate." [Lou Dobbs Tonight, 8/10/09]

Echoing Beck, Hannity falsely claimed Obama told health care protesters "to shut up"

From the August 11 edition of Hannity:

HANNITY: The only people, John, that are yelling here and calling names -- it's Obama telling the American people to shut up, it's Nancy Pelosi attacking the American people, it's the Democrats comparing them to Nazis -- the Democrats are doing that.

[...]

LEE: There needs to be -- back to be a level of civility, and that is what is lacking in this debate. To scream and to shout at each other just to --

HANNITY: Maybe Obama should stop telling them to shut up.

LEE: Well, and he didn't -- the president didn't say that.

HANNITY: He did. He said it last week --

LEE: He did not say -- he did not --

HANNITY: -- I don't want to hear from them anymore.

LEE: He did not say that. [Hannity, 8/11/09]

Hannity echoed Beck's false claim that Obama said he doesn't want health reform protesters to "do a lot of talking." On the August 10 edition of his Fox News program, Glenn Beck aired a cropped version of Obama's August 6 remarks at a rally for Virginia gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds, falsely claiming that Obama's statement, "I don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking," was his "reaction to the health care protests."

Obama was actually discussing "folks on the other side of the aisle" who increased the deficit, not health care reform protesters. From Obama's remarks:

OBAMA: So, now, you got folks on the other side of the aisle pointing at the federal budget and somehow trying to put that at our feet. Well, let's look at the history. When I walked in, we had a $1.3 trillion deficit. That was gift-wrapped and waiting for me when I walked in the Oval Office. Without my policies, we'd have an even higher deficit going forward. The one exception is the recovery package that we had to do in order to get this economy moving again.

So you can't go out there and charge up the credit card, go on a -- all kinds of things -- shopping sprees on things that didn't grow the economy, hand over the bill to us, and say -- then say, "Why haven't you paid it off yet?" I got that bill from you.

So, we've got some work to do. I don't mind, by the way, being responsible; I expect to be held responsible for these issues because I'm the president. But I don't want the folks who created the mess -- I don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them just to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don't mind cleaning up after them, but don't do a lot of talking. [Obama remarks in Tysons Corner, Virginia, 8/6/09]

Obama spokesman: President welcomes "spirited debate about health care" but doesn't think "scream[ing]" is "productive"

BILL BURTON (White House deputy press secretary): The President thinks that if people want to come and have a spirited debate about health care, a real vigorous conversation about it, that's a part of the American tradition and he encourages that. ... And so if people want to come and have their concerns and their questions answered, the President thinks that's important. Now, if you just want to come to a town hall so that you can disrupt and so that you can scream over another person, he doesn't think that that's productive. And as a country, we've been able to make progress when people actually talk out what our problems are, not try to shout each other down. [White House press gaggle, 8/10/09]

Transcripts

From the August 11 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

ROBERT GIBBS (White House press secretary) [video clip]: I think what is unproductive, though, is if somebody tries to come to a town hall meeting and you can't ask your question or your mother can't ask her question because somebody else is yelling. That's what cable TV and the food fight brings to this.

HANNITY: The only people, John, that are yelling here and calling names -- it's Obama telling the American people to shut up, it's Nancy Pelosi attacking the American people, it's the Democrats comparing them to Nazis -- the Democrats are doing that.

JOHN McWHORTER (Manhattan Institute senior fellow): Oh, yeah. I mean, I'll tell you honestly that I think a lot of the people who are yelling in these town hall meetings do have some problems with misinformation. But, nevertheless, it seems to me that back in my day, when I used to teach at UC Berkeley and the big debate was affirmative action, I saw people on the left acting in the same way with the same lack of manners, the same volume, the same misinformation. Now, it wasn't in the formal setting of a town meeting about a national policy -- same thing.

HANNITY: Wait a minute. What misinformation? What yelling? You know what I see? I see fathers with their kids in wheelchairs. I see veterans that are speaking. Is there passion? Yeah, there's passion. You know, maybe they don't have the --

McWHORTER: Yes.

HANNITY: So that -- but that's real passion.

McWHORTER: They do feel what they feel. Yeah.

HANNITY: Because they see their country's going bankrupt. They see that every promise that has been made has been broken, and they're being attacked and called Nazis by people that are supposed to be public servants.

[...]

PENNY LEE (Democratic strategist): There needs to be -- back to be a level of civility, and that is what is lacking in this debate. To scream and to shout at each other just to --

HANNITY: Maybe Obama should stop telling them to shut up.

LEE: Well, and he didn't -- the president didn't say that.

HANNITY: He did. He said it last week --

LEE: He did not say -- he did not --

HANNITY: -- I don't want to hear from them anymore.

LEE: He did not say that.

HANNITY: Nancy Pelosi said they had swastikas.

LEE: Again, America is great when we have --

HANNITY: Nancy Pelosi said they are un-American.

LEE: America is great -- America is great when we do have that public discourse and we have freedom of speech, and that is a wonderful thing.

HANNITY: Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Nancy Pelosi --

LEE: But shouting at each other --

HANNITY: Nancy Pelosi --

LEE: But shouting at each other similar to what you and I are doing right now, but is not --

HANNITY: Wait a minute. Nancy Pelosi is the speaker of the House, and she wrote with Steny Hoyer that they are un-American. I can't think of anything more quintessentially American.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (August 12, 2009 9:52 am ET)
      4  
      Another masterpiece from Sean "The Projector" Hannity...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (August 12, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
        4  
        Another name for HANNITY, LIAR for the FAR RIGHT WING.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by yber26 (August 12, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
          4  
          How would Hanity know. Were they checking voter registration cards at the door.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (August 12, 2009 9:57 am ET)
      3 2
      Sean Hannity, The Media-Matters 2009 Mis-informer of the Year Award is waiting for You.
      You make it so easy because you don't seem to have a Clue.
      You see screaming Right-Wing crowds at Town Hall meetings as America at it's Best.
      I feel sorry for you Sean & this is not said in Jest.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by puttforever4682 (August 12, 2009 10:17 am ET)
      4 1
      Once again it is not Hannity that is the problem as much as the people who will follow him. One in four(or five) people in this country are loony. This is a real problem that starts with our education system.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (August 12, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
        5  
        Incorrect. Don't offer excuses to him. He takes millions upon millions of dollars a year in salary with the full intention of misinforming and muddying waters.

        His is supposed to be a public service to the United States of America. He gets no pass. No.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Oklad (August 12, 2009 2:32 pm ET)
          2  
          Hear! Hear!
          .
          I don't know how he sleeps at night.
          .
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NewBee (August 12, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
            1  
            I don't know how he sleeps at night.
            Easy. Lack of a functioning conscious. People need to get it through their heads that people like Hannity are dormant psychopaths. Not everyone has morals or a sense of fairness.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:31 am ET)
                1
              I believe you meant "conscience", and calling Hannity listeners psychopaths just shows your lack of intelligence.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:44 am ET)
                   
                calling Hannity listeners psychopaths
                Ah. I didn't call his listeners psychopaths. In fact, I said nothing of "listeners" at all. It was all about Hannity. Here's the sentence again:
                People need to get it through their heads that people like Hannity are dormant psychopaths.
                Don't feel bad, you aren't the first nor the last right-winger to fail a reading comprehension test. Perhaps you should pay more attention to the content next time, rather than the spelling.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:03 am ET)
                     
                  He's not a psychopath either. He's simply someone that disagrees with your messiah. You may want to get used to it. It will happen often.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
                    1
                  Well, unlike you, I can apparently spell, so I guess that's a step in the right direction.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
                       
                    Well, unlike you, I can apparently spell, so I guess that's a step in the right direction.
                    Maybe you will graduate up to reading comprehension some day. You could always go to night school.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by puttforever4682 (August 13, 2009 4:50 am ET)
             
          Are you saying people are compelled to believe his drivel? Of course hannity is horrible. Where does individual responsibility for watching and repeating drivel start?

          I base my numbers on those who voted for Bush the second time, when almost anyone could see his presidency was a sham. Those who support wars in Iraq and afghanistan are loony. Please do not tell me we can win in Afghanistan, either. We could have won in Viet Nam ,too(those that think that are looy, as well).
          I identify Hannity as a problem but people who listen to him, O'reilly, Levin, Savage Limbaugh, get no pass because they are wacko!!!!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Vincenzo (August 12, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
        1  
        I wouldn't grant him that many followers. Maybe 1 in 5 are ignorant but a much smaller number are looney tunes extreme enough to follow Nutboy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (August 12, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
            2
          That's interesting since he has multiple times the viewers that your heroes Maddow and Olbermann have. Combined.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Vincenzo (August 12, 2009 6:39 pm ET)
            1  
            Ahh. Once again. To tell you the truth I don't watch Rachel & Keith every day because most of what they broadcast in revealing the lies of the right is so obvious. I do watch once and a while to get a kick out of their dismembering of the lies of Beck, Hannity, and others. Now the audience of your highly rated commentators are a whole different lot in my opinion...people too lazy, ignorant, or prejudiced that need the hate, lies and conspiracy theories that fit conveniently into their other lovely thoughts about the world.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:34 am ET)
                1
              You opinion of the viewers/listeners of those people are absolutely meaningless for obvious reasons. You are an extremist liberal and nothing will change your opinion, I get taht. I will be honest with you, I used to be a liberal until I grew up and actually saw the world for what it was and realized that EXTREME liberalism is bad for the country.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Vincenzo (August 13, 2009 10:57 am ET)
                   
                So instead you've resorted to manufacturing a pile of crap and calling it the truth.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
                    2
                  Your response makes no sense. Nice try though.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:45 am ET)
                       
                    Your response makes no sense
                    You prove his point. Righties have a problem with reading comprehension. We know that. You don't have to give us another example.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:03 am ET)
                        1
                      Explain what the response meant then.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:27 pm ET)
                           
                        Explain what the response meant then.
                        I don't have to. This isn't kindergarten. Those that can't read will just have to suffer from their own ignorance.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
                        1
                      I see, so it's my fault the response makes absolutely no sense. Interesting.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:28 pm ET)
                           
                        I see, so it's my fault the response makes absolutely no sense. Interesting.
                        Why are you responding twice to every post? Are you schizo?
                        Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 13, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
                1  
                I will be honest with you, I used to be a liberal until I grew up...

                Oh, a classic. Haven't seen that one for a while. Thanks for being so honest.

                I can only hope that I reach the intellectual level where I can respond to a comment about the percentage of Americans who are loonies with a comment about how many of those loonies watch loony TV. Brilliant!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:04 am ET)
                     
                  I'm not allowed to be converted liberal? Interesting...
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:27 pm ET)
                       
                    I'm not allowed to be converted liberal? Interesting...
                    No, you can't convert to liberalism. We don't want you. You can kindly stay over there with the other crazies on the right-wing side.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (August 12, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
          1 1
          And those are the people who are stupid enough to buy tickets to his Freedom Concerts, which have been proven to be a dishonest scam. I'll find the link when I get the chance.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (August 12, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
              1
            A quick Google search brought up the truth about Hannity's Freedom Concerts:

            Hannity's "Freedom" concert is a money scam

            by davefromqueens

            Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 04:29:15 AM PDT

            After weaving through voluminous amounts of carefully crafted, parsed language and following up on the reporting of news hounds and a daily kos diarist it appears that Sean Hannity and Oliver North are using the name of dead American soldiers to garner profits for a right wing organization masquerading as a charity.

            Sean Hannity claims that his concerts are "to benefit the freedom alliance scholarship fund for the children of America's Military heroes featuring Country Music Stars Montgomery Gentry, Leann Rimes, and Lee Greenwood." A closer looks at the facts tell a different story.

            <more>

            http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/8/6/6165/93743
            Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:35 am ET)
              1
            Explain how it's a scam. It's a concert that people pay money to go to. I guess all concerts are scams?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 13, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
                 
              Really? Because when I hear him talk about it, it sounds like it is supposed to be earning money for the soldiers. So now it is a for-profit? Interesting. I wonder why Hannity does not just say that instead of using the families of dead soldiers to drive up attendance and therefore his revenue.

              You may have some more growing up to do, stark, if you do not see the difference between Hannity's freedom concerts and "all concerts". Think about it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
                  1
                When you give money to a charity, that would be non-profit. Seriously, use common sense for once.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by puttforever4682 (August 13, 2009 6:04 am ET)
             
          Those people who supported George Bush at the end of his presidency fall into the loony bin. His approval rating should have been no more than single digits.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:36 am ET)
              1
            That's interesting because the democratic-run Congress's approval ratings dropped into the single digits.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:47 am ET)
                 
              Congressional ratings are always bad, because people generally like their congressional representatives but distrust the rest.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:06 am ET)
                   
                So, the fact that the democratically run congress had the worst approval ratings of all time is just a conincidence?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
                     
                  Please provide a source for your claim, preferably one that isn't a right-wing nut site.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
                   
                They had the lowest approval ratings of all time. That's hardly "always".
                Report Abuse
                • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
                     
                  Please provide a source for your claim, preferably one that isn't a right-wing nut site.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (August 12, 2009 10:25 am ET)
      5 1
      The only one yelling in that discussion group is Sean Hannity.

      Honestly, I don't think the man knows what civil discourse means. He certainly doesn't know what a debate is. He has made a living shouting over people, being rude, spreading lies, and calling people names.

      The Republic has survived and prospered in spite of the Hannities and his ilk before.Eventually people will stop thinking of this as political entertainment; and see it for what it is, bottom feeding for ratings and profit.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sheerinsanity (August 12, 2009 10:50 am ET)
      5  
      But Hannity pals around with Nazis like Andy Martin and Hal Turner. Since he's big on "guilt by association" (Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers), I guess that would make Hannity a Nazi.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jhallbo (August 12, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
        1  
        I loved that Gibbs-Hannity interview concerning "guilt by association". After watching that, I'm a Gibbs fan for life.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by starkcr31 (August 12, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
          1
        How are they Nazis?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (August 12, 2009 10:53 am ET)
      5  
      Hannity and his ilk are no longer merely annoying, they have become dangerous. From being screwball entertainers they are now calling the shots. The very democratic process is being held hostage by his drooling followers. How many times do I have to say it? WE ARE DOOMED!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New2politics (August 12, 2009 10:55 am ET)
      4 1
      Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh they all lie, yet they make more money than most people could ever dream of. They are the un-americans who don't deserve the time on air. All three prey on the less educated and stir-up the unjustified anger that only the ignorant will display. Talk about unfairness!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 12, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
      4  
      Whatever. This is hardly worth noting anymore. Every time these right wing blow hards get caught doing something stupid they say 'It's not us, it's them.' or 'They started it.' It's pretty easy to pull up video of a right wing bobble head calling someone on the left names. Politicians not so much on either side. They're usually a little more careful.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MikeW67 (August 12, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
      4 1
      Mental limitations of GOP dupes; "a nation that polls 75% for universal coverage, won't see through our bully tactics"...

      Even if GOPJoe thinks he'll never need a government program to get him health insurance (as soon as he loses his job, he will...), there are tens of millions of his fellow Americans that do need it provided. The need is critical, not optional nor frivolous.

      They apparently continue to fall for the proven failure of "market-based" reform that the GOP has been claiming for decades is the solution, while more and more Americans lose coverage.

      Bulletin for misinformed town hall trouble-makers: This reform is not about you if you are covered. It is about the 100 million Americans now un or underinsured, ONE ILLNESS AWAY FROM FINANCIAL RUIN. Wake up...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
        2  
        I agree but the reform of our health insurance system is also about those who are covered. Especially in this kind of an economy.

        Those with insurance from their employers are one step away from the unemployment line, which means they're one major illness away from total financial ruin.

        And unemployment checks won't leave enough left after food and housing expenses to pay for health insurance under COBRA.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
          4  
          Others have mentioned it, but I have to laugh at the wingnuts who had no problem with Bush requiring people to sign Loyalty Oaths to gain admittance to rallies, suddenly outraged that they aren't allowed to destroy any discussion at town hall meetings.

          How about a Non-Ignorance Pledge? I'd be fine with that,here's my idea (at the risk of sounding elitist)-

          I believe I've heard that admission to some of these town halls is done through an online lottery. How about a website (not done exclusively by the White House, maybe a bi-partisan panel to approve content) with all existing versions of bills posted.

          And, a list of falsehoods and misinformation, followed by the facts (again, overseen by representatives of both sides).

          Then, a short online quiz , with tickets to the town hall given to those who have shown they really want to understand and discuss, and are not simply intent on showing up with a dazed look on their face to screech out their willful ignorance.

          It's embarrassing to me, as an American, that the president had to take even a few seconds of his meeting to say that he doesn't support "death panels".

          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
            3  
            We seem to have more ignorance today than I ever thought possible.

            I've read posts all week that say "that's the craziest thing I've heard today".

            My response is always, well it's early yet.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (August 12, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
        1 2
        Mental limitations of GOP dupes; "a nation that polls 75% for universal coverage, won't see through our bully tactics"...


        I would like to know where that poll came from.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hoagie (August 12, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
        1 2
        Really, 100 million people don't have coverage? Try about 1/3 of that and many actually do qualify for medicaid. You already have government run health care (Medicare & Medicaid) hosing the hospitals & doctors by only reimbursing them about $0.90 on the dollar, the private insurance companies are picking up the tab on that by being charged more. Now, you want to expand government run health care which will drive private insurance companies out of business which will make NO competition and we will all be screwed? Have you read the proposed house bill? There are about 500 pages that don't even have anything to do with "insuring the uninsured". I have lived in a socialist country & have experienced crappy government run health care. Somehow, this fantasy that it will be free is just too much. I paid almost 13% sales tax on everything. Not only that, the only reason I had a doctor was because my company assigned me one because I was an expat. The other unlucky people had to wait in line at the emergency for hours to get any help or sign up for the once/month that the doctor came to our town. You are really out of touch with how economies and supply/demand works if you think the government should run any services. We need tort reform and free market competition, not government run health care.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:48 am ET)
          1  
          Paragraphs. Look into it. I'd read your diatribe if it didn't hurt the eyes so much.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by starkcr31 (August 12, 2009 2:25 pm ET)
      1 3
      I heard the quote from Nancy Pelosi. It's absolutely true.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
        1  
        I think that's been pretty well established, stark, I think anybody paying attention knows that Pelosi didn't say anything untrue. Shouting down democracy is un-American, and right-wingers were carrying swastikas.

        It's up to people like you and me to straighten out the Hannity fans who might believe the lies he's telling about Pelosi.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (August 12, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
          1 4
          They weren't shouting down democracy. Saying someone is un-American for simply disagreeing with your health care bill is not only unfair but is un-American. They were carrying swasikas in protest, as it represents the socialist agenda of Nazi Germany.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by JimmyCraghorn (August 12, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
            1  
            "Saying someone is un-American for simply disagreeing with your health care bill is not only unfair but is un-American"

            Its a good thing noone said that.

            And I'm glad you agree that Pelosi was right about people carrying swastikas. But why are the protesters wanting to support Nazi policies?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                3
              Yes, they did actually, and the protesters were not supporting Nazi policies, they were pointing out the Nazi-like socialist agenda of the current administration.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:50 am ET)
                   
                There's nothing Nazi-like about anything Obama has done so far. Maybe if he spied on his own people, outed CIA agents that uncovered his lies and started wars on trumped up evidence, you'd have a point.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:07 am ET)
                     
                  Look up what "Nazi" means.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
                       
                    Look up what "Nazi" means.
                    I did. Strangely, it just had a picture of Dick Cheney.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
                     
                  So full-blown socialism isn't Nazi-like? Interesting.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:22 pm ET)
                       
                    So full-blown socialism isn't Nazi-like?
                    Obama's policies aren't socialism. Even if they were, they are the antithesis of Nazi-ism.

                    What books have you read about the Third Reich? I'm curious where you think you get your "facts" about the Nazis.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by my4cents (August 12, 2009 3:54 pm ET)
               
            Just like all anti-gun activists go around carrying guns, in their rallies.
            I get it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
            1  
            Are you flip-flopping, stark? It looks like you're now saying that the quotes from Pelosi were not true. Make up your mind.

            I think that misinformed people trying to prevent a discussion by screaming qualifies as "shouting down democracy". We may just have to agree to disagree here.

            As Jimmy Craghorn points out, your second sentence is a strawman, and not even a very good one.

            And then you go back to agreeing that Pelosi was right about the swastikas, but I'm not sure what your point is about people carrying Nazi symbols to represent their socialist ideas. The Nazis were very anti-socialist, which would make "socialist agenda of Nazi Germany" something that doesn't exist.

            Are you saying that the socialists carrying the swastikas are protesting the Nazi's anti-socialist agenda?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:40 am ET)
                1
              No, I'm not flip-flopping. I never said what she said was true, I said it was true that she said it. The people carrying the swastikas are not socialists, they are protesting that form of government.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 13, 2009 5:20 pm ET)
                   
                I heard the quote from Nancy Pelosi. It's absolutely true.

                I never said what she said was true, I said it was true that she said it.


                What did she say ? (This would be a good place for a quote from Pelosi, not from Seannie)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:08 am ET)
                    1
                  She referred to the protesters as Nazis.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
                     
                  She said the protesters were like Nazis. This isn't that complicated.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:19 pm ET)
                       
                    She said the protesters were like Nazis. This isn't that complicated.
                    No, she didn't. The rebuttal is even less complicated.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by fishergirlusmc (August 12, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
          1 1
          Col.
          you are right it is rude also. But how come not one person here seemed to mind when it was constantly done to conservatives? Like Jim Gilchrist from the minutemen? Or how about Anne Coulter and Clarence Thomas to name a few? Or when people were holding signs depicting Bush as a Nazi or Hitler? They tried to physically attack Bush and his motorcade in Oregon in 2002 remember that? also the pictures of the swastikas had a red line going through them. Not that it's right but they carried these around during the eight years of Bush and not one word from this site. Why not?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
            3  
            You're being pretty vague, FGUSMC."How about so & so?" and "they.." are sort of hard to address. Specifics make for a much better discussion.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
              3  
              There you go again.

              Makin' sense.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
                3  
                I've been furiously Googling "T.H.E.Y." and "P.E.O.P.L.E" , and can't seem to find any information on these organizations.They're clever, seem to be flying under the radar.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I've been having the same problem. Whenever I hear one of the intelligentsia from Fox mentioning that "Some say...", I google S.O.M.E. and get nothing.



                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 12, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
              6  
              Fishergirl, your argument is not very convincing...

              There were no liberal commentators during the Bush years who were calling Junior a Hitler or a fascist.

              Right now, we have probably a dozen high-profile media commentators screaming Obama is Hitler, Obama is a fascist, etc.

              There may have been isolated incidents during the Bush years when liberals shouted down conservatives--although I would need to check your examples--if that happened, it was wrong.

              But there is absolutely no comparison between what went on during the Bush years and what's going on now with this orchestrated domestic terrorism from conservatives.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
            4  
            Did any of the incidents take place at meetings between legislators and their constituents? The meetings are being taken over by misinformed people. No one seems to have legitimate questions at the town hall meetings. They have talking points provided by heath industry lobbyists.

            There are senior citizens worried about a government take over of their medicare. There are young people who claim they want their country back. People are worried about being killed by our government. This is insanity on an entirely new level.

            The town hall meetings are set up for the legislators to impart information to the people and for the people to give respectful feedback to congress. Nothing is accomplished by screaming and adding to the confusion.



            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
              7 1
              King, there was an item yesterday where Boss Hogg lies about the Arlen Specter town hall. Specter tells a teabagger that what she's talking about is a rumor, and Hogg insists she's "reading from the bill".

              Of course, she isn't.I linked to the video on that thread, and while the woman mentioned by Hogg seems to know what she's doing, and is intentionally lying, there are others who seem so misinformed that they're genuinely terrified.

              One woman is doing this melodramatic, finger jabbing rant, insisting that the country is restored to exactly what the founding fathers established (taking away her vote, so I might back her up on that), another geezer goes off on a Gitmo closure---> Terrorists "in his area"---> possible escapes---> Islam demands killing all non-Muslims scenario that apparently has him tossing & turning at night.

              I'm all for opposing viewpoints, and debate on the issues, but is it too much to ask that we have some sort of minimum requirement in the sanity department, or that the people debating have some passing acquaintance with reality?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
                4  
                It must really suck to be Specter. I really felt sorry for him during his town hall meetings.

                At the one he did last week in Philly, I could swear that the woman holding the red bible is my niece who traded her addiction to booze and pills for an addiction to Our Risen Savior.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 11:16 am ET)
                    2
                  Yeah, it sucks when you're a sell-out.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:51 am ET)
                       
                    Spector saw the writing on the wall. Today's liberal is yesterday's moderate. His party left him long ago. It was time to return the favor.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
                        1
                      Wrong again. He left the party because he knew his constituents were liberals and they wouldn't reelect him as a republican. All these people care about is getting reelected (both parties). They couldn't care less about defending their values or doing what's best for the people they represent. It's a joke.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:18 pm ET)
                           
                        He left the party because he knew his constituents were liberals and they wouldn't reelect him as a republican.
                        No. You are wrong. He was being attacked be the ever more nutty far-right wing of his party.

                        This is a fact. I know they are like holy water to your vampire.
                        Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (August 12, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
            3  
            They tried to physically attack Bush and his motorcade in Oregon in 2002 remember that?


            That sounds bad. How close did they get? I don't think many here would support such actions, even against W.

            But what about this...

            Since Mr Obama took office, the rate of threats against the president has increased 400 per cent from the 3,000 a year or so under President George W. Bush, according to Ronald Kessler, author of In the President's Secret Service.

            http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html

            Seems your attempt to equate the two environments kinda falls flat. Not mention your comparing of pundits and militia men to town hall meetings of elected representatives to discuss pending legislation is just ridiculous.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by my4cents (August 12, 2009 9:42 pm ET)
            2  
            By your logic, how come no one asked for Pres. Bush's birth certificate in the past eight years?
            Why did no one worry about deficits when they kept going up year after year?
            Reverse hypocrisy does no one any good.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by skbenz (August 12, 2009 6:52 pm ET)
        1
      Isn't this a little like crediting Palin for saying she can see Russia from her house when it was actually Tina Fey from SNL? She actually said something like they are neighbors with Russia, so that qualifies as foreign policy experience. Whatever.

      I think that Hannity has picked up on the general sentiment of Obama, Pelosi and Hoyer. They are trying to tell the 'protesters' to shut up and referring to Nazism/fascism, etc. while making their case. Not very smart in my opinion. It's just adding fuel to the fire.

      Hannity and Beck are exactly the same as Maddow and Olbermann. They overstate things to sensationalize them and don't come off very well to the average citizen. There's truth in there somewhere, you just have to filter out the vitriol to find it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (August 12, 2009 7:11 pm ET)
           
        The actual quote is:

        "They're our next-door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska."

        If Maddow and Olbermann are the same as Hannity and Beck, please show us where either has made up something as ridiculous as Beck's FEMA camps or Hannity's insistence that Obama is a socialist and is trying to make this a socialist country.

        The only thing they have in common is their use of hyperbole. The difference is that Hannity and Beck's contains not a shred of truth.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (August 12, 2009 8:48 pm ET)
          3  
          Aside from the truth vs. lies part, they're exactly the same.

          There was a poster here a few days ago, the most recent thespian taking on the above-it-all, impartial concern troll role, who was a little more clever. He told a story about how his liberal friends think he must follow Boss Hogg Limbaugh, while his conservative friends guessed he was a fan of Michael Moore.

          Concern Troll, being completely unbiased, and not shackled by ideology, understood that they were both windbags.

          See, he didn't make a direct comparison (actually, in several 1,000 word posts over a few days, he never said much of anything directly) but he made it clear that anybody who saw a difference between Rush & Moore is not thinking as clearly as he is.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
            1
          They aren't the same. Hannity and Beck actually have viewers and ratings.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by puttforever4682 (August 13, 2009 5:00 am ET)
        1  
        Hannity and Beck are exactly the same as Maddow and Olbermann.

        Hardly. The reality is totally missing from Hannity and Beck.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (August 13, 2009 10:40 am ET)
            4
          Yeah, everything Olbermann says is true. Wow that is freaking hilarious.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 4:52 am ET)
               
            Yeah, everything Olbermann says is true.
            I've yet to see a rightie successfully show where he's lied. Instead, they attack him personally because he dare give them a dose of their own medicine only laced with truth instead of fabrications.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (August 14, 2009 10:09 am ET)
                1
              His basic job description is to attack Rush Limbaugh.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by NewBee (August 14, 2009 8:15 pm ET)
                   
                His basic job description is to attack Rush Limbaugh.
                You are proving our point. Rush lies. Olbermann calls out Rush. Since the opposite of a liar is a truth-teller your theory doesn't hold water.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by eastcoast (August 13, 2009 12:46 am ET)
      3  
      I would love to see a sit down on live tv between olbermann and maddow against hannity and limpo. Have an independent team of fact checkers. Each team can bring video or audio of the other teams percieved lies. Then the fact checkers can bring out the truth right there for everyone to see. I know that olbermann and maddow would jump at the chance to do that. Hannity and limpo not so much.
      Anyone who gets their information from more than one source and can fact check knows that 99% of what hannity and limpo say is false or made up. Anyone who listens to limpo and hannity and believes them are hardcore rightwingers,always were and always will be. They need to here the lies and the things that those to make up. They are racists who cant stand the fact that theres a black man as the POTUS.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hoagie (August 13, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
          1
        i hope all you left wingers are watching hannity right now, he actually has 50% obomamaniancs & 50% mccain voters on his show debating....someone actually being fair & balanced
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.