UPDATED: Despite Air America "blackout," companies support Beck, Dobbs, and Limbaugh
Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Lou Dobbs have used their radio and television shows to incite hatred and push wild conspiracy theories, leading several of Beck's advertisers to reportedly pull out of his broadcasts. Many advertisers have nonetheless sponsored these hosts' hate speech in recent weeks, including major corporations and organizations that, in 2006, reportedly requested that ABC Radio Networks not air their advertisements during any Air America programs.
In 2006, companies reportedly requested their ads not run during Air America content
ABC memo: Corporations and organizations "request" that "NONE of their commercials air within AIR AMERICA programming." In October 2006, Media Matters for America obtained an internal ABC Radio Networks memo listing nearly 100 ABC advertisers that reportedly requested that "NONE of their commercials air within AIR AMERICA programming." (Some of those companies later said they were included on ABC's "blackout" list by mistake.) ABC subsequently provided a statement to Media Matters, which read: "It is not uncommon for advertisers and/or agencies to request that their ads run or not run in specific programming environments or dayparts. ABC Radio Networks does not solicit nor encourage these requests from advertisers. If a request is made by an advertiser/and [sic] or agency we make our best effort to comply."
Air America "blackout" in sharp contrast to "commercial success of right-wing talk radio." The New York Times reported at the time that "the advertisers' avoidance of Air America's liberal programming seems pointed when contrasted with the commercial success of right-wing talk radio programs like those of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity." [New York Times, 11/6/06]
Advertisers on Air America "blackout" list have recently sponsored Beck, Dobbs, Limbaugh broadcasts
Despite their appearance on ABC's Air America "blackout" list in 2006, a number of those same advertisers have recently run ads during broadcasts of one or more of the following: Limbaugh's radio show, Beck's Fox News show, Beck's radio show, Dobbs' CNN show, and Dobbs' radio show. These advertisers include:
UPDATE (8/12): Since posting this item, Media Matters has identified and added to the item additional companies and organizations that appeared on the Air America "blackout" list but have nonetheless recently advertised on Dobbs' radio show. They are: Frito-Lay, Office Depot, Visa, the American Heart Association, and the U.S. Navy.
|
Show |
Advertiser |
|
Beck Radio |
General Electric |
|
Farmers Insurance |
|
|
Office Depot |
|
|
Beck TV |
Farmers Insurance (see update below) |
|
General Electric |
|
|
Nestle (Gerber) |
|
|
Red Lobster* |
|
|
State Farm (see update below) |
|
|
Travelocity** (see update below) |
|
|
U.S. Postal Service |
|
|
Wal-Mart (see update below) |
|
|
Wyeth |
|
|
Dobbs Radio |
Bayer |
|
Chattem (Gold Bond) |
|
|
Wyeth |
|
| Frito-Lay | |
| Office Depot | |
| Visa | |
| American Heart Association | |
| U.S. Navy | |
|
Dobbs TV |
Allstate*** |
|
Bayer |
|
|
U.S. Postal Service |
|
|
Wal-Mart |
|
|
Limbaugh |
Home Depot |
|
JC Penney |
|
|
Office Depot |
|
* Red Lobster reportedly later said that it "has made no decision to not advertise on Air America Radio" and that its "current [2006] marketing does not include any radio advertising."
** Travelocity reportedly said: "There was a simple misunderstanding. We did not intentionally pull our advertising from this program and Travelocity has been removed from that [Air America "blackout"] list."
*** According to Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Allstate "said that [it was] on the [Air America "blackout"] list by mistake."
Beck reportedly loses advertisers after calling Obama a "racist"
UPDATE (8/19/2009): Farmer's Insurance: "we ceased placing [ads] on Glenn Beck a week ago." Since the item was last updated, Politico's Michael Calderone has reported that "a Farmers spokesperson confirms" "Farmers Insurance can be added" to the list of companies that "have agreed to pull advertisements from Glenn Beck's television show." From Calderone's blog post:
Already, twenty companies have agreed to pull advertisements from Glenn Beck's television show, within weeks of the Fox host calling Obama "a racist" and saying the president "has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture."
Now, Farmers Insurance can be added to that list, a Farmers spokesperson confirms to POLITICO.
"We advertise on Fox News Channel which places our ads in the Network programming, and we ceased placing on Glenn Beck a week ago," said the spokesperson.
Wal-Mart "pulled ads from the Glenn Beck show on August 3rd"; Travelocity "ha[s] now specifically asked that our ads do not appear during [Beck's] show." Since the item was last updated, ColorofChange.org has issued a press release stating that Wal-Mart and Travelocity, among others, "have confirmed to ColorOfChange.org that they pulled their ads from the controversial Fox News Channel broadcaster's eponymous show." From the press release:
"Walmart [sic (in original)] today confirmed the retailer pulled ads from the Glenn Beck show on August 3rd," said David Tovar, a spokesperson for Wal-Mart, in an email to ColorOfChange.org.
[...]
"We did not specifically place our ad on the show," said Amanda Borichevsky, a spokesperson for Travelocity in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "We buy ads in bulk and then they are placed somewhat randomly. However, we have now specifically asked that our ads do not appear during this show."
In addition, the following comment was posted after this item's initial publication:
I work for a public relations agency representing Travelocity.
To clarify, please note that Travelocity did not specifically place its advertisements on the Glenn Beck program. Simply put, Travelocity buys ads in bulk and then they are placed somewhat randomly.
However, as of Monday Travelocity specifically asked that its ads do not appear during this show.
Thanks,
Michael O'Connor Clarke
UPDATE: State Farm has "taken steps to make sure" it no longer advertises on Beck's show. After posting this item, Media Matters received the following statement from State Farm Insurance:
In response to inquiries concerning State Farm's recent advertisements in the Glenn Beck program, I want to clarify this situation.
We have a policy of not advertising on political or opinion programming. We have corrected this issue and have taken steps to make sure it does not happen again.
Understanding our millions of customers and thousands of associates hold a full spectrum of views on political issues, State Farm has a long-standing practice of not advertising in political discussion programming regardless of a program's political point of view.
Because of the recent situation, State Farm is now evaluating its commercial placement practices to ensure its political issues advertising guidelines are maintained.
Phil Supple
Public Affairs
State Farm Insurance
LexisNexis "suspended further advertising during Mr. Beck's program." From a ColorOfChange.org press release:
Three companies who run ads during Glenn Beck -- NexisLexis-owned Lawyers.com, Procter & Gamble and Progressive Insurance -- today distanced themselves from Beck. LexisNexis has pulled its advertising from Beck and says it has no plans to advertise on the program in the future. Both Procter & Gamble and Progressive Insurance called the Beck advertising placements an error that they would correct.
The decision by the three companies comes as over 45,000 ColorOfChange.org members call on advertisers to pull their ads from Glenn Beck after the controversial news host called President Obama a "racist" who "has a deep-seated hatred for white people" on "Fox & Friends" last week.
"Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention," said John Michaels, Senior Communications Manager at LexisNexis in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "We have suspended further advertising during Mr. Beck's program." [ColorOfChange.org release, 8/6/09]
"GEICO no longer runs any paid advertising spots during Mr. Beck's program." From a subsequent ColorOfChange.org release:
Adding to a growing list of advertisers distancing themselves from controversial Fox News personality Glenn Beck, GEICO has pledged to re-direct their advertisements away from Beck's program on the Fox News Channel. The decision by GEICO comes on the heels of announcements made last week that LexisNexis-owned Lawyers.com, Procter & Gamble, Progressive Insurance and SC Johnson were distancing themselves from Beck after the news host called President Obama a "racist" who "has a deep-seated hatred for white people."
"On Tuesday, August 4, GEICO instructed its ad buying service to redistribute its inventory of rotational spots on FOX-TV to their other network programs, exclusive of the Glenn Beck program," said a spokesperson for GEICO Corporate Communications in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "As of August 4, GEICO no longer runs any paid advertising spots during Mr. Beck's program." [ColorOfChange.org release, 8/10/09]
"Sargento ads won't be airing during" Beck's Fox show. From an email Sargento sent to Media Matters' Oliver Willis:
We deeply appreciate your reaching out to us and sharing your comments and concerns about Sargento ads appearing during "The Glenn Beck Show." We sat down with the marketing department to talk about it and I learned that we buy time periods not specific programs. But in any event, they've made the decision to exclude that program from our future ad rotation. Simply stated, Sargento ads won't be airing during that show. Again, thanks for contacting us.
Glenn Beck's outrageous commentary
Advertisers on the Air America "blackout" list support Beck. Some of the advertisers that have recently run commercials during Beck's radio program and Fox News show also appeared on the Air America "blackout" list. For Beck's radio program, they include: Farmers Insurance, General Electric, and Office Depot. For Beck's Fox News show, the advertisers include: Farmers Insurance (see update above), General Electric, Nestle (Gerber), Red Lobster, State Farm Insurance (see update above), Travelocity (see update above), the U.S. Postal Service, Wal-Mart (see update above), and Wyeth.
Beck talks about "put[ting] poison" in Speaker Pelosi's wine. On his Fox News show, Beck gave a glass of wine to a person wearing a Pelosi mask, encouraged her to drink it, and then said: "By the way, I put poison in your -- no, I -- I look forward to all the policy discussions that we're supposed to have." [Glenn Beck, 8/6/09]
Beck: Obama is a "racist" and "has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or the white culture." Beck said: "This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy -- over and over and over again -- who has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or the white culture -- I don't know what it is. But you can't sit in a pew with Jeremiah Wright for 20 years and not hear some of that stuff and not have it wash over." He later added, "I'm not saying that he doesn't like white people. I'm saying he has a problem. He has a -- this guy is, I believe, a racist. Look at the way -- look at the things he has been surrounded by." [Fox News' Fox & Friends, 7/28/09]
Beck: "Everything that is getting pushed through Congress, including this health care bill" is "driven by President Obama's thinking on ... reparations" and his desire to "settle old racial scores." According to Beck, "Everything that is getting pushed through Congress, including this health care bill, are transforming America. And they are all driven by President Obama's thinking on one idea: reparations." Beck later added that Obama's "goal is creating a new America, a new model, a model that will settle old racial scores through new social justice." [Glenn Beck, 7/23/09]
Beck imitates Obama pouring gasoline on "average American"; says, "President Obama, why don't you just set us on fire?" From the April 9 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:
BECK: So what does Obama do, he says, boy, I'm not -- I'm just out of stuff to do. What else could I possibly do to the American people?
President Obama, why don't you just set us on fire? For the love of Pete, what are you doing? Do you not hear -- do you not hear the cries of people who are saying stop? We would like some sanity in our country for a second!
We didn't vote to lose the republic. We didn't vote for any of this stuff. We voted for change.
[...]
We can disagree with each other on policies, but Good Lord Almighty, man, please. Some of us don't agree with all of the policies. We'd like to have a country left in the end of four years. No need to set us on fire. [Glenn Beck, 4/9/09]

Beck: U.S. government under Bush and Obama moving us "into a system of fascism." Beck said: "I am not saying that Barack Obama is a fascist. I am not saying the Democrats are a fascist. I'm saying the government under Bush and under Obama and under -- under all of the presidents that we've seen, or at least most of the presidents we've seen for quite some time, are slowly but surely moving us away from our republic and into a system of fascism." [Glenn Beck, 4/1/09]
Beck calls Sotomayor a "racist" who "is not that bright" and "divisive." Discussing then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, Beck said, "I think the woman is a racist. ... I think the woman is not so bright. From what I have heard from people who have worked around her, worked with her ... she's not that bright, and she is a divisive individual." [Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program, 5/28/09]
Beck on health care: "This system is going to come out the other side dictorial -- it's going to come out a fascist state." Beck told a caller: "Let me tell you something, the end game ... for Congress and this president -- and I don't know how many members of Congress even realize the game that they are either being used in or a pawn in. But believe me, they'll take ... the universal health care coverage over what ... skin they do have in it. They're going to come out -- this system is going to come out the other side dictorial -- it is going to come out a fascist state." [The Glenn Beck Program, 7/27/09]
Beck: "We are a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism"; "I can't debunk" FEMA camps conspiracy theory. Saying that Eastern European countries "understand freedom," Beck added: "We don't even understand freedom anymore. We are a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism, beyond your wildest imagination. I have to tell you, I'm doing a story tonight that I wanted to debunk these FEMA camps." Beck further stated: "I'm tired of hearing -- I wanted to debunk them. Well, we've now for several days done research on them. I can't debunk them. And we're going to carry the story tonight. ... [I]t is our government. If you trust our government, it's fine. If you have any kind of fear that we might be headed towards a totalitarian state, look out, buckle up. There is something going on in our country that is -- ain't good." [Fox & Friends, 3/3/09] (Beck eventually managed to "debunk" this conspiracy theory.)
Lou Dobbs' outrageous commentary
Advertisers on the Air America "blackout" list support Dobbs. Recent advertisers on Dobbs' radio program who also appeared on the Air America "blackout" list are: Bayer, Chattem (Gold Bond), Wyeth, Frito-Lay, Office Depot, Visa, the American Heart Association, and the U.S. Navy. For Dobbs' CNN show, the recent advertisers who were also on the Air America "blackout" list include: Allstate, Bayer, the U.S. Postal Service, and Wal-Mart.
Dobbs' anti-Obama rant: "I'm moving from being an independent, sir, to being absolutely opposed to ... any policy you could conceive of." From the August 6 broadcast of The Lou Dobbs Show:
DOBBS: Now we're going to be talking at some various points today in rather hushed tones. When you call in, I want you to be very, very careful, because the White House -- the White House apparatus -- is listening. Listening carefully. And all of its supporters are ready to turn you in. Oh my God, it's happening, right before our very ears. Oh my lord. I'm going to speak up just a little bit. What do you think you're doing, Barack Obama? What kind of mindless, churlish, un-American nonsense are you ginning up this time? I'm moving from being an independent, sir, to being absolutely opposed to your -- any policy you could conceive of. I mean, this is getting ridiculous. Who are these idiots who work for you? I know they won you an election, sir, but I have got to tell you. This is ignorance on parade emanating from 1600 Pennsylvania, and these fellows are your responsibility. [United Stations Radio Networks' The Lou Dobbs Show, 8/6/09]
Dobbs has claimed birth certificate provided by Obama is not "the real document." On July 15 on CNN, Dobbs cast doubt on the adequacy of the birth certificate posted by FactCheck.org, saying: "President Obama was born in Hawaii, according to state officials, and copies of his certification of birth -- FactCheck.org, investigating those circumstances prior to the election, and they have a copy of what they say is the original birth certificate posted on their website. It is, in fact, the so-called short form, not the original document. It is really a document saying that the state of Hawaii has the real document in its possession." [CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, 7/15/09]
Dobbs: Obama birth certificate is not "the real deal." On the July 15 broadcast of his radio show, Dobbs claimed that a "long-form" birth certificate -- rather than the document Obama has provided -- is "the real deal," asking: "What do you think? Is President Obama -- should he produce his birth certificate -- the long form, the real deal? Should he be a little more forthcoming?" [The Lou Dobbs Show, 7/15/09]
Dobbs faulted "liberal" media "trying to knock down" birth certificate "issue" and claimed "a certificate of live birth is not a birth certificate." On his July 21 radio show, Dobbs said that "there's certain quarters of the national liberal media that are just absolutely trying to knock down the issue of President Obama's birth certificate -- his certificate of live birth. And it's funny, because this is an issue that I get a lot of calls on from time to time and we -- and what we talk about is the fact that a certificate of live birth is not a birth certificate. It isn't the original document." [The Lou Dobbs Show; 7/21/09]
Dobbs: "I do believe in a national left-wing media conspiracy in which they work in concert and attack like hell." After agreeing with Jim Geraghty's assertion that "[i]n order to discredit you, when you have really legitimate lines of criticism, there is an effort to paint you as something you're not ... a conspiracy theorist, et cetera," Dobbs said: "By the way, they missed the one conspiracy ... that I do believe in. And that is I do believe in a national left-wing media conspiracy in which they work in concert and attack like hell, and they're not even in the slightest embarrassed by their own nonsense and just absolute dishonesty. It's -- it's, to me, without question, and established conspiracy." [The Lou Dobbs Show, 7/23/09]
Dobbs: Obama's policies are "raising new concerns about what many are calling a socialist revolution in prospect -- some say even a risk of totalitarianism." Dobbs claimed Obama's policies are "raising new concerns about what many are calling a socialist revolution in prospect -- some say even a risk of totalitarianism." Dobbs made this assertion while displaying onscreen text reading, "Socialist Revolution." [Lou Dobbs Tonight, 3/31/09]
Dobbs: America is "moving toward a combination of corporate power and political power" that is "disturbingly similar to what we witnessed in Italy in the 1930s." Later on his March 31 CNN show, referring to the Pay for Performance Act, which "would tie pay to performance at companies that have received direct capital investments under the Troubled Asset Relief Program," Dobbs said, "We are moving toward a combination of corporate power and political power that is so disturbingly similar to what we witnessed in Italy in the 1930s, and it's not funny." [Lou Dobbs Tonight, 3/31/09]
Dobbs: Cabinet secretaries are "acting like commissars in the old Soviet Union." On the April 16 broadcast of his radio show, Dobbs said Cabinet secretaries "are acting like commissars in the old Soviet Union," adding that "it's time for them to get rolled back. This is America, and it's not some fascist state." [The Lou Dobbs Show, 4/16/09]
Dobbs: "[W]hat this White House is leading us to is direct confrontation, a physical confrontation." From the August 7 broadcast of The Lou Dobbs Show:
DOBBS: I am pro-labor, by the way, folks. I am pro-business. But I gotta tell you, what this White House is leading us to is direct confrontation, a physical confrontation, and they're going to take -- President Obama will take full responsibility for what happens here. You heard his voice in Virginia. This is a -- I mean, he's -- he's fanning the flames of a mob.
He's not a president trying to bring some sort of sensibility and order to a public debate. This is a guy who didn't want debate, remember? He wanted legislation passed come hell or high water by today. He didn't get it. And the result here is that suddenly dialogue is inconvenient -- oh, my God. This, Mr. President, I'm begging you. Find your senses and lead this nation in a positive and open way, just as you promised in your campaign.
This is thuggery. It is ridiculous to tolerate. Your attack dogs on the left wing are having their way, and you, sir -- you sir now know what is happening, if you did not before. Before, it was on those who worked for you, and the way in which they served you not being in the national interest. Now, Mr. President, this is entirely on you what happens. And it will be -- let me be very clear -- your responsibility. [The Lou Dobbs Show, 8/7/09]
Dobbs warns of mythical "North American Union." Dobbs said on his radio show: "There is an agenda at work here. I truly believe it's all about -- and Barack Obama referred to it in his meetings with [Canadian Prime Minister] Stephen Harper in Ottawa, in which they talked about harmonization. This is an effort, I truly believe, to extend ultimately to the North American Union -- that is, the combination of Mexico, the United States, and Canada. That's underlying much -- that's subtext for much of what is happening. There's no other explanation -- other than outright corruption and utter madness." [The Lou Dobbs Show, 3/3/09]
Rush Limbaugh's outrageous commentary
Advertisers on the Air America "blackout" list support Limbaugh. Rush Limbaugh's recent advertisers who also appeared on the Air America "blackout" list include: Home Depot, Office Depot, and JC Penney.
Limbaugh: "Of course I want Obama to fail," and "I hope" the stimulus package "prolongs the recession." Limbaugh said on February 13: "Of course I want Obama to fail. And after this stimulus bill package passes, I want it to fail." Limbaugh later stated: "Not only do I want Obama to fail, I want this package to fail. I want this to blow up in their face. I want this to be seen by the American people for what it is -- nothing to do with getting them jobs, nothing to do with reviving the gross domestic product of this country." Referring to the economic recovery plan, Limbaugh said: "I hope it prolongs the recession." [Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show; 2/13/09]
Limbaugh on Obama: "We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black." On January 21, referring to media coverage of Obama, Limbaugh said: "We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles, bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father was black, because this is the first black president." [Fox News' Hannity, 1/21/09]
Limbaugh discusses "the similarities between the Democrat Party of today and the Nazi Party in Germany." From the August 6 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:
LIMBAUGH: They accuse of us being Nazis, and Obama's got a health care logo that's right out of Adolf Hitler's playbook. Now, what are the similarities between the Democrat Party of today and the Nazi Party in Germany? Well, the Nazis were against big business. They hated big business. And, of course, we all know that they were opposed to Jewish capitalism.
They were insanely, irrationally against pollution. They were for two years mandatory voluntary service to Germany. They had a whole bunch of make-work projects to keep people working, one of which was the Autobahn. They were against cruelty and vivisection of animals. But in the radical sense of devaluing human life, they banned smoking. They were totally against that. They were for abortion and euthanasia of the undesirables, as we all know, and they were for cradle-to-grave nationalized health care.
This is why I have always bristled when I hear people claim that conservatism gets close to Nazism. It is liberalism that's the closest you can get to Nazism and socialism. It's all bundled up under the socialist banner. There are far more similarities between Nancy Pelosi and Adolf Hitler than between these people showing up at town halls to protest a Hitler-like policy that's being heralded by a Hitler-like logo.
[...]
LIMBAUGH: Oh, another similarity: Obama is asking citizens to rat each other out like Hitler did. Obama's the one that's got the snitch website right out of the White House -- flag@whitehouse.com -- asking citizens to report people who are saying weird, odd things. You know, the White House response: "No, no, no, we're not taking names here. We're not taking names. We're just taking people who are putting up faulty arguments and refuting them." Well, that's not the intention. Ted Kennedy's dad, by the way, Joe Kennedy, sympathetic to Hitler, sympathetic to the Nazis. [The Rush Limbaugh Show; 8/06/09]
Limbaugh: "Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, also ruled by dictate." Limbaugh also said on August 6: "Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, also ruled by dictate. His Cabinet only met once -- one day. That was it. Hitler said he didn't need to meet with his Cabinet; he represented the will of the people. He was called the messiah. He said the people spoke through him." [The Rush Limbaugh Show; 8/06/09]
Hours before it turned violent, Limbaugh warned listeners that Obama "mobilized union thugs" for Tampa town hall. On August 6, hours before violence broke out at Rep. Kathy Castor's (D-FL) town hall meeting, Limbaugh said on his radio show: "This is from my buddy Erick Erickson at RedState.com: 'Trying to avoid middle class workers opposed to ObamaCare, Congresswoman Kathy Castor, Democrat-Florida, has scheduled a last-minute town hall for tonight -- she wasn't going to have one. She will be surrounded by union goons from the Service Employees International Union to feed middle class voters to alligators if they dare criticize ObamaCare.' " Limbaugh continued: "This is what's happened. Obama has mobilized union thugs to go out and also attend these town meetings to intimidate the genuine citizens out there who are upset about this. ... Those are paid active -- paid activists are going to be showing up. And that's why -- so the Democrats are going to get brave now. So they're going to have protection. Their -- the mob's showing up. The real genuine mob is showing up to protect these Democrats from the unruly Nazis that are showing up to protest the health care bill." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 8/06/09]
Limbaugh: "ObamaCare is the end of the United States as we know it." On July 28, Limbaugh said, "This -- ObamaCare is ballgame. ObamaCare is the end of the United States as we know it; it's not just the end of health care as you know it. With government-run health care, every aspect of our lives will be regulated as it relates to the cost of health care." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 7/28/09]
Limbaugh: Sotomayor is "a reverse racist"; Obama is "the greatest living example of a reverse racist." On May 26, Limbaugh said, "So, here you have a racist. You might want to soften that, and you might want to say a reverse racist. And the libs, of course, say that minorities cannot be racists because they don't have the power to implement their racism. Well, those days are gone, because reverse racists certainly do have the power to implement their power. Obama is the greatest living example of a reverse racist, and now he's appointed one." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 5/26/09]
Limbaugh: "Barack Obama has yet to have to prove he's a citizen. All he'd have to do is show a birth certificate." On July 20, Limbaugh stated: "Barack Obama has yet to have to prove he's a citizen. All he'd have to do is show a birth certificate. He has yet to have to prove he's -- I have to show them 14 different ways where the hell I am every day of the year for three years." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 7/20/09]
Limbaugh: "God does not have a birth certificate. Neither does Obama." On June 10, Limbaugh said, "Hey, Mr. Snerdley, you know, a lot of people talk about Obama and his messianic complex. He does have one thing in common with God. Barack Obama has one thing in common with God. Do you know what it is? God does not have a birth certificate either. ... God does not have a birth certificate. Neither does Obama -- not that we've seen." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/10/09]
Limbaugh: "Obama's entire economic program is reparations." On June 22, Limbaugh stated: "What they don't know is that in -- Obama's entire economic program is reparations. If I were [Al] Sharpton, if I'd been guest-hosting Sharpton's show and I got a call like that, somebody complaining, I'd say, 'No, don't do -- hey, hey, hey, shh, shh, let me tell you the truth here. Everything in the stimulus plan, every plan he's got is reparations. He's going to take from the rich -- he's going to take from them, he's going to give it to you. It's just can't happen overnight. Be patient.' That's what's -- redistribution of wealth, reparations, returning the nation's wealth to its rightful owners, whatever you want to call it. It's reparations." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/22/09]
Limbaugh: Obama "wants to pay people to kill some of us before we are born and before we are ready to die." Limbaugh also said on the August 22 broadcast of his show: "By the way, here's another way to look at it. We've learned that elective abortions -- Peter Orszag, the budget director, said, 'No, I can't -- the elective abortions -- I can't say that they're not going to be paid for.' Elective abortions will be covered in Obama health care. So, the way to explain this to people is that President Obama, of the compassionate Democrat Party, wants to provide cover for those who kill us before we are born. He wants to pay people to kill some of us before we are born and before we're ready to die after we are born. It's called 'efficiency.' " [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/22/09]
Limbaugh: Obama sending out "union thugs," involved in "Mussolini-type stuff." On August 7, Limbaugh stated: "Obama sends out his army. You gotta -- folks, this is -- this Mussolini-type stuff. This is the president of the United States -- who cannot deal with opposition. There will not be any. He is going to silence it -- sending his union thugs out to physically assault in some cases and to, in all cases, intimidate average Americans who just want some answers." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 8/07/09]















Yeah, cause free speech sucks.
ColorOfChange.org is that a Mob also? Now I am sure they are getting money from somewhere, just need to look deeper. Talk about manufactured protest.
Wow, so you are sitting here looking at a list of who to boycott and tell me that I live by others, ha ha please I am hurt from laughing so hard at you. I will support them just to counter balance you. Second Color for Change is an organization that was co founed by a current White House Czar, so in a nut shell the White House is behind this boycott. Last, I used the headline above to ask, what companies Ed Schultz has on his show, cause if you are going to boycott the others you should boycott his, since he has made the worse statement yet.
OOOOh that meanie Ed Schultz...how dare he highlight what the righty talkers have been saying (Nazi, hates America, racist, not born in U.S., bring your guns, etc)
We eat real seafood here, not the inedible crap you're running out to get from Red Lobster.
If you like Glen beck, seriously, I wonder where all your brain cells went.
And please explain to me what you recommend, anyway. If you were dealing with some irresponsible, unhinged liberal who had millions of viewers, you surely wouldn't want the government to fix that. Now, you don't want anyone to be able to boycott the advertisers. What's left?
As far as dealing with some irresponsible, unhinged liberal who had millions of viewers...luckily do to the free market system being in place I won't have to worry about that right now. I guess Keith Olbermann would be the closest thing to an unhinged liberal receiving millions of viewers. Although I don't know if he reaches that many viewers yet. But either way I don't want the government to touch him. The American people can fix stuff themselves...they don't watch him and so I'm sure their are plenty of advertisers who just don't waste their good hard earned marketing dollars to advertise during his "PRIMETIME" time slot. Ok, I sometimes watch him. So anyways I know it's hard to grasp that more people think like I do and Glenn Beck than you and Keith Olbermann but that's how it works. For now. Big Corporations are selfish entities...their goal is profit(or big bad greed)to survive. So when corporations do something that actually has a negative affect on their company disproportionately then you have to ask "what's in it for them?". They are not going to make more money by not advertising on Beck they are going to make less. I know you see all corporations as wonderful rainbow makers now that Obama is in charge but trust me their not. So I'm not giving you an answer...just giving you a question you should be asking.
I know the government shouldn't be involved. You say that people can fix stuff, but isn't bringing Beck's insanity to the companies attention exactly that? Don't you think it's reasonable that they wouldn't want to be associated with someone as extreme as he is? I don't think you're seeing the full picture here. Let's say you have a rabid, unapologetic racist on the air. He might have several million loyal viewers. Is advertising on that show a profitable idea? Probably not, because you're going to have an awful lot of people who are going to make a lot of noise against the show, and by extension, against you. So in this situation advertisers have to ask themselves if they want to be associated with this nut, and whether the number of viewers makes that association worthwhile or not. After all, there are other shows to advertise on, and there could also be someone who replaces Beck who would also make for profitable advertising without the backlash.
I'm not sure how you think that Beck's audience is really interested in a battle of ideas. This is a guy who claimed that symbols in our nation's history are based on Fascism, while those symbols were around before Fascism was. So are the people who buy into that brand of idiocy really going to switch to another channel because someone's beating Beck with ideas? Apparently not.
Funny how that works.
And do you mean this nonexistant Paris Business Review?
http://www.parisbusinessreview.net/sites/PBR/contact.asp
MMFA claimed it was nonexistant and said that after a search they could not find any record of it but obviously they were dead wrong. Weren't they?
Thanks for making my day.
No wonder failcon likes it so much.
And anyways there is of course nothing dishonest about sighting a parody website to support his claims about his proposed boycotts.
don,t worry about neo-cons getting things or learning something new it goes against their philosophy which is to remain ignorant at all cost after all if they learned the truth they would have to admit they are wrong and GOD forbid a neo-con admitting they are wrong
And "Fictional facts for wrong-Headed right-Wingers". Was that supposed to be on the page when O'Reilly's staffer was reading it? Did you notice the bit about "Two Peabody awards"? Does the fact that they tell you to expect a complete on-line presence by Fall 2004 strike you as a little bit odd?
Apparently, we're supposed to believe that this was something that was really putting out articles, and then as soon as O'Reilly quoted their April Fools article, they never published anything again. They just made the whole webpage a reference to O'Reilly and called it quits.
But even that unlikely scenario doesn't fly. Don't you think that if the physical magazine existed since 1951 (or ever, really), that there would be many, many references generated while googling it? I used to edit a magazine that I can pretty much guarantee nobody here would have ever heard of. But when I google that publication, I can see clear and abundant evidence of its existence. Googling "Paris Business Review" does not lead you to any evidence of an actual, physical magazine. There is no "as published in the Paris Business Review in 1975..." or "old copies of the Paris Business Review" or anything of the sort. There isn't even any reference to anything ever published in the online magazine, as far as I saw, and there would surely be some traces left from articles referenced on other sites. Can you find the "Poor Little France" article, or any reference to it besides this webpage? And since that page supposedly came about on April 1st, 2004, the same day as this elusive article was published, why the hell wouldn't it be put online and linked on that page?
MMfA probably didn't mention that website because it is more than obvious that it was created for the sole purpose of mocking O'Reilly's reference to a nonexistent magazine. They probably put a few seconds worth of thought into it.
PLEASE folks...PLEASE go to this "source" that fairliberal is citing to back up his argument!
Wow!
Something else I didn't think of earlier;even the title "Poor Little France" is so unbelievably sarcastic that it should be obvious that it's not the title of an article posted in a French business journal. It's clearly mocking the ineffectiveness of O'Reilly's boycott, along with his inflated ego.
These right wing hacks have made their careers on attacking and destroying people based on their hypocritical moral judgements. Playing on the fears of poor losers who need to feel someone else is beneath them. So save your lame argument. What's the problem? They'll always have Fox, they don't need no stinkin' advertisers.
O'Reilly was trying to boycott a country because they wouldn't go along with the lies the Bush administration used to drag the rest of us into the Maelstrom.
No one is suggesting that anyone be taken off the air. But in this country we value the free market. And just like you, we'll spend our money where it's appreciated.
Sure, we'll all get right on that. Stay tuned.
All I'm saying is that this sentence right here is incorrect. One more time...right above me...this statement by creeksneakers is not true. It's like when you have a test and you're get to the true and false portion and the question was presented as so:
Right and Left don't equate. The left isn't spreading lies and hatred and inflamming stupid people into mob actions and even violence. If somebody on the left did, he would be taken off the air in seconds.
In order to receive a correct grade on that particular question you would have to circle the false option or bubble it in for those using scantrons.
Feel free to explain how boycotting someone's sponsors violates their free speech.
Boy, conservatives sure are desparate to feel like martyrs....
Irresponsibility breeds its own consequences. A boycott is also "free speech." And truly "free speech" proceeds from clear thinking and pure intent.
Jones is the founder of Green For All, an organization focused on creating green jobs in impoverished areas. He is also the co-founder of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and Color of Change, and was the author of the 2008 New York Times best-seller, The Green Collar Economy.
And a major contributor to President Obama's campainge.
And dont they have somtthing to with MSNBC ?
Are the jumping ship, or just want the best of both worlds.
More to the point--GE owning media AND being a war contractor is disconcerting to say the least.
And now GE is doing it legally with a Dimocratic majority in Congress. A much larger majority.
FYI, GE reportedly stopped doing business in Iran a couple of years ago. Same with Halliburton.
How many people at these rallies had car keys?
It might be disturbing to you but luckily we vote people into office to represent us and protect our rights so we don't have stop doing things you find disturbing.
And again, not everything is a legal issue. You can leer at women on the subway, but it's still not appropriate. You can continue to do it if you like, but people will find you creepy. Is this clear now?
I don't know how to make it any clearer that we're not talking about a legal issue here. Why you think "punishing" is relevant is a mystery. It does matter if you appear to be creepy because you're going to damage your party. If you guys wore hockey masks and smocks covered in fake blood while carrying fake chainsaws at your national convention, that would be legal. It wouldn't exactly inspire the centrists to vote for you, though. Carrying guns into town hall events makes you look like violent extremists.
Unclench your white-knuckled fingers from your gun and relax. Nobody's trying to confiscate your guns. It's just good advice. OK?
I'm talking about Republicans and conservatives. If you vote for a third party, then it doesn't apply to you.
we need more!!!!
what you get went you drop 100 lawyers into Santa Monica bay??
" A good start"
humor is the best medicine
guessing you wouldnt like the one about why sharks leave lawyers alone in the water Professional curtsied
but really you need to take a chill pill.
Of course a layman must hire a lawyer to bring any kind of claim, or assert a defense. In most big cities, ambulance-chasing lawyers bring so many junk lawsuits that the dockets are flooded, and an aggrieved party must pay those very same con-men just to navigate the system.
Save your sanctimony. Nowadays, scientists, doctors and grade school teachers do far more for humanity then lawyers. Now its a racket, no better than used car dealerships . . .
I know a few lawyers that actually try to help people and ain't getting rich.
Scientists? Like the ones who had studies suppressed by the Bush admin? And teachers? I assume you mean parents who home school and not those that teach at "government schools".
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/1/31/government_scientists_accuse_bush_administration_of
The rest of your post isn't worth a reply.
But seriously thank you for the information regarding the Bush administrations suppression. I will admit some of the information was kind of boring so I didn't read it all but from what I read I will conclude it this way. Any administration that suppresses science because it say's something he doesn't like is wrong. Any administration who signs into law legislation that makes the government bigger, therefore more intrusive into American lives, supporting one side of the debate on what's causing the globe to warm, is wrong too.
I could not agree more with your summary of what lawyers have and do for this country and the rest of the civilized world. But you are talking about the good guys. There ARE lawyers who have imbedded within the system provisions that protect and empower the greedy and the dishonest to rob and circumvent the very laws you and I admire and abide by. The disgust with which many view lawyers is not just some moronic idea. Like any profession, the police, for instance, have to contend with negative attitudes because of a few violent and crazy types that overshadow the good ones. The conviction or release of a person accused of a capital crime often hinges on the lawyer's ability to confuse and manipulate a jury, legally. Many are sitting on death row for crimes they did not comment and some are released to kill again. Come to New Orleans if you want to see how the system is played.
I wonder though if you have ever had to deal with a lawyer, in the Family Law field? Your opinion might change a little.
I hope my daughter the lawyer doesn't read this.
I'd think you'd be more concerned about your "daughter the lawyer" seeing you link to the Paris Business Review site above in order to make some point. I know I'm still laughing my a$$ off over that one!
Me thinks that Rush is trying to create a situation that will make it very dangerous for Rush's removal from the airwaves and is doing everything he can to create a self fulfilling prophesy for when the day comes and his own advertisers turn away in disgust of him and as his bosses finally pull the plug on him...
I can easily believe that several of his listeners would see that as the sign to take up arms against a figment of their imagination and lack of being able to tell fantasy apart from reality or that it is Obama, Clinton, and Carter coming for them all... really... those scary Democrats and liberals and progressives oh my!
FOOLS!
Cap, recall the wack job lady who was getting ready to attack an Army base because of the FEMA "internment camp" she thought was there...
Conmpanies should just advertise in other places.
I realize that, generally speaking, liberal radio listeners aren't your typical ditto-zombies - averse to original thought and predisposed to herding - that make up the bulk of the rightie radio audience who will patriotically buy any product that Rush or Shyawn mentions on their shows. But why not give advertising on the more sagacious liberal programming a chance too? True, your ads will have to go beyond the normal bandwagon marketing ploys so effective among the conservative crowd, as your typical liberal will apply independent reasoning and logic to the consideration of a purchase. Why not take up the challenge?
Look at it this way - liberal policies are better for the country in general, and the economy specifically. A better economy means more disposable income for more people, and a larger consumer base. Contributing to the promotion of such policies is in your own best interest.
Do you mean "Tax the rich?" I know that makes all of you on the left feel good, but how does it really help?
Please explain this to me, cause I'm trying to understand.
Yeah didn't Jimmy Carter prove that. And with all that prosperity we had a lot of free time to wait in long gas lines.
http://www.learnoutloud.com/Free-Audio-Video/Politics/-/Jimmy-Carter-Inauguration-Speech-1977/6971
Assuming your other opinions are based on the level of knowledge you've demonstrated here explains a lot.
http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=264727202278115
As Tolkien said "you speak ill of that which is fair beyond the reach of your thought; and only little wit can excuse you."
Wait, Obama may very well be more like Carter, except for the carpentry skills, than even Clinton.
If the truth is "speaking ill," so be it.
The Iran hostage situation really caused him to lose his re-election. There was a secret deal made by the Reagan camp to release the hostages AFTER the election. If you don't know that, you might check the overwhelming evidence that this is so.
Carter is not anti-Semetic and if you would bother to read his book, you'd know that. If you believe that Israel has been blameless in the Palestinian situation, you're woefully ignorant.
On the media note, during his presidency the press was hostile to him. They don't like anyone who isn't apart of their little beltway clique.
That editorial was written in May '07. We've since entered the worst recession since the great depression (I happen to think it's going to be worse) caused by the worst president ever. The author of that piece has proven himself to be less than prophetic or perceptive.
People listen to Rush because he is witty and upbeat and informative. Beck isn't as effective as Rush, but he is a better communicator than anyone that AA ever aired. It's apparently hard to be be funny when you're a leftist snob.
Ratings attract advertisers, and advertisers produce profits. Air America couldn't even get laughs from its zombies. It wasn't funny, it was whiny.
and referring to Air America in the past tense is a cute touch, but a bit premature. In your mind that's all there is of progressive radio I guess. That was true when they started but not true now.
But please consider adding a section to your wbesite which includes an up-to-date list of ALL corporatiuons who sponsor the TV and Radio shows of at leats the really big hitters.
Maybe start with those that support Limbaugh, Savage, O'Rielly, Beck, Hannity and Dobbs.
Links, Addresses and Phone Numbers would be helpful. This would lend a lot of power to your "calls for actions" and give all of your readers and posters a chance to make a difference.
We have a policy of not advertising on political or opinion programming. We have corrected this issue and have taken steps to make sure it does not happen again.
Understanding our millions of customers and thousands of associates hold a full spectrum of views on political issues, State Farm has a long-standing practice of not advertising in political discussion programming regardless of a program’s political point of view.
Because of the recent situation, State Farm is now evaluating its commercial placement practices to ensure its political issues advertising guidelines are maintained.
Phil Supple
Public Affairs
State Farm Insurance
Also, causing us concern about the truthiness of your post is that if you rearrange the two "T"s in in State and the two "N's in Insurance, you get the code name State Farm Insurance. Now that is some coincidence, isn't it?
You cannot put anything past us.
Signed,
Proud Conservative and FairlyLiberal
Its a simple way to express displeasure.
Rush and Beck reach an audience of over 25 million people.
Whereas, the bankrupt Air America radio has no measurable audience in most market areas.
It's really not a tough business decision.
Air America is irrelevant.
Air America has had some stupid management but seems to be holding its own, despite a shaky history. It's not irrelevant if you consider that there was NO progressive radio or television before they started. This seems suspect doesn't it, considering how many progressives are present in the country?
And air America failed because they had the likes of Springer , Garafalo and Franken as their on air personalities. And there were progressive radio and TV before Air America, they all failed too. No message , no viewers, that is the lesson to be learned.
Recently I discovered this MMFA prediction about Fox , could they have been more wrong?
http://mediamatters.org/columns/200801290001
You must be referring to Alan Berg, out of Denver, who was shot and killed because of his liberal views. I guess you would say he failed to protect himself.
And you've probably been told this before, but just to reiterate in the context of the popular conservative programs, the flies always congregate around large piles of poo.
Where should we go for the truth?
If you read through them, you can see that even while it was being aired, the political content of Donahue's show was micromanaged from the start, particularly when it came to what kind of guests Donahue could have on. That should give you a fairly good idea of who really controls the content of the news; I'll give you a hint, it usually aint the faces you see on TV.
No, there is not one place where one could have learned about this, nor is there one source from which all facts procede. What bothers me is the hordes right-wingers I come across whose ignorance on countless issues is matched only by their self-assurance, because, by their own choice, they have only been hearing things which confirm their beliefs. I dont have any particular animus towards people like this; I have plenty of RW friends about whom I would say the same thing. However, you really do choose how much you are going to know.
The POWER of TALK RADIO led to one of the largest defeats in history.....and it was to a Black guy.
Well done Rush...Well done Beck... and you are doing it again.
Creepy Bobo, you gots lots to learn.
The only ratings in America that count are the final BCS ratings.
Hilarious!
No, scooter. Reagan's winning 49 states was.
Obama is a "one & done" failure, just like Carter...he's already got the lowest approval rating of any President in the last 60 years.
What are you smoking? We just had a president with an approval rating consistently in the high-mid twenties. President Obama's is in the low fifties at the moment. Don't be afraid to use check what your masters tell you on google before you embarrass by posting it on the internet. Seriously, it wont kill you.
You really enjoy making things up, don't you.
Obama has the lowest approval rating of any president in the last 60 years? Do you really think that we already forgot Bush, with approval ratings in the twenties? Or Bush I? Or Reagan? Or Nixon? or Ford?
See, when you're trying to make a point, it works better to use actual facts, not to make things up. This is why we hold people like Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Levin, Savage, Luntz, Malkin, Coulter, Scarborough, and Dobbs in such contempt. They openly and flagrantly lie.
Wow 52.7% of the popular vote is one of the largest defeats in history, seems a bit of an overstatement to me. Perhaps you are not good with numbers.
and it was to a Black guy.
Wow, such a racist remark from an enlightened progressive like you.
Nice try. But he is just referring to the fact that a black person winning the presidency by any kind of margin wasn't thought at all possible. It doesn't show him to be racist, it shows that this country was (still is) racist.
And the only people that I see of late bringing up race are lefties. If fact they continually make race an issue even when it isn't even a factor. To many on the left if you disagree with Obama you are a racist. That attitude just shows the kind of crutch that the left needs to make a point. Everything boils down to race.
I am but a simple poster, not nearly of your caliber so why do you wish to misinterpret my simple post.
I like your line "And the only people that I see of late bringing up race are lefties." So the words SEE OF LATE" absolves the racists on the right. Tell me, what did you see before????
By the way, it is the same crowd listening to the same guy over and over. He is the best to ever sit behind a mike and generate the kind of money he does for his owners and himself. I won't question that..but his message is pure trash and jealousy. Al those listeners and he is classless and no one respects him except his followers.
And I have seen bigotry on both sides in my lifetime. And I will be surprised if it totally disappears in my lifetime. But what we can do without is the manufactured claims of racism from the left that we see all too often.
There are more and more people everyday who disagree with Obama's policies, that does not make them racist.
The left would do good to realize that. But I suspect they don't want to, it is too valuable a tool.
We will never have a color free society if these games continue on both sides of the fence. Racism is offensive but it continues to be when it is unjustifably used because someone doesn't have the resources to have an intellegent debate.
http://talkers.com/online/?p=71
Perhaps, if Air America had done so it wouldn't have failed so miserably...but, I still think they would have. All AA ever did was have vile, foul-mouthed illiterates like Randi Rhodes spewing hate...that's not a viable business model.
Now that's the difference between "left" and "right" talk show hosts. You might not like the opinions of the lefty talkers, but they are at least basing their opinions on facts. AND, they criticise "their side" when they deem it appropriate.
Dobbs with his birther nonsense is in La La land, every day. Beck decides that our President is a racist, based upon...Nothing. Limbaugh lies everyday. etc.
Relatively speaking...Rush and Beck are irrelevant.
Besides, I truly hope they aren't irrelevant because everyday they continue to slide off into the deep end, people will continue to see how incredibly dangerous and stupid they are and Republicans will remain a meaningless afterthought politically.
Keep on talkin' Beck, Rush, BillO. Every time you hear something stoopid fly out of your mouths, another independent gets their Democratic wings!
Somewhere there has to be a fine line between arguing the truth and arguing fiction. In no way does the President tell people what to say. If I ever see the President I have to stand in three hour lines just like any other American I know. It would be an honor to be in the same room as our President. I sure don't feel like that about old Lou. I guess he can't find much to talk about in his older years so, he has to gossip. The problem with the gossip is how it is interpreted. Reporters has a responsibility to see that our country remains peaceful and Lou does nothing to bring peace only controversy and unrest.
Red Lobster: For The Racist In You.
Now all of our seafood dishes come with all-you-can-eat* Glen Beck*-brand racist nonsense and general insanity. And, for a limited time, buy one republican party membership, get one free!
*Urge to vomit may occur. See Glen Beck for details.
Corporate Address
Red Lobster
5900 Lake Ellenor Drive
Orlando, FL 32809
(407) 245-4000
He stated that he will forward my complaint to their media/advertising dept
He's a huge Rush Limbaugh fan, so you're peeing into the wind.
Since GE owns MSNBC and they run Olbermann and Maddow, we'd have to presume that GE is playing both ends of the field?
Was this due to an attempt at political censorship or was it done with the knowledge that listenership would drop off during Air America programming? Isn't it significant to know which it was especially where advertisers might be paying for a pre-determined number of spots?
Nielsen Ratings for Cable News - August 11, 2009
5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck– 2,331,000 viewers (687,000) (1,113,000)
Situation Room—748,000 viewers (159,000) (331,000)
Hardball w/ Chris Matthews—621,000 viewers (133,000) (308,000)
Fast Money—245,000 viewers (70,000) (113,000)
Prime News–164,000 viewers (63,000) (100,000)
You guys never want to discuss context..just that "he has the biggerest audience". Again, what good do these biggerest rated show do on the political front other than lose elctions. My proof is 2006, 2008 and 2010..ditto that til about 2020.
Maybe Republicans will then get they idea that the Cons have ruined your Party. Need proof, let me see, 2006, 2008 etc etc.
Unless the Paris Business Review reported that McCain and the QOTUS won the election.
It's all about the money...which leads me to "who's really in bed with Big Business??" They all are...Dems, Repubs, it doesn't matter. The politicians use their symbiotic relationship with BB to advance their agendas, and BB will hop on the train as long as it's profitable. Just trying to illustrate that Evil Republicans aren't the only ones giving BB a reach around.
Have you read any of the above? Geico; Sargento; Lawyers.com; Men's Warehouse; State Farm; Proctor & Gamble; Progressive Insurance.
You were saying?
Exactly, the advertisers paid for a TV ads on a radio show. No wonder they were upset.
To clarify, please note that Travelocity did not specifically place its advertisements on the Glenn Beck program. Simply put, Travelocity buys ads in bulk and then they are placed somewhat randomly.
However, as of Monday Travelocity specifically asked that its ads do not appear during this show.
Thanks,
Michael O'Connor Clarke
mocc@thornleyfallis.com
Art Bell in his wisdom and care founded the National Association of Radio Talk Show Hosts. He had help. But, of course, we are not bound by that rule. There are, of course, three things that govern a talk show host's privilege to broadcast, the first and most powerful is that he or she must sell advertising and make money for the station, network or disseminating entity. The second, of course, is that the broadcasting entity approve of the show and its contents and, if it does not, in most cases can shut the show down in minutes flat. The third is the Federal Communications Act is which there are certain rules against incitement of violence, sedition, violations of national security or the health and well being of the U.S., its elected officials and the citizenry. Violating ther Secrets Act and the little known Broadcasting Board of Governors, who exercize control over U.S. propaganda broadcasts via Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and its sister agencies. One of the members is Hillary Rodham Clinton, former board member of Walmart. But in the U.S. the advertisers rule and those like Glenn Beck and Mike Savage have learned the bitter lesson.
Free speech is a right with responsibilities and limits. It is about time we realize this. Sometimes I am almost embarrassed over the US media. Many foreigners are shocked when they here what goes on here. And don't come to me complaining that they are all socialist. Most of those making this claim don't even understand what your talking about. I know that is a little harshly put, but it is true.