About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Politico twice mischaracterizes Dems' comments to assert they called "protesters" un-American

August 12, 2009 2:24 pm ET — 22 Comments

In an August 7 blog post and an August 10 article, the Politico reported as fact that Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer had called health care town hall protesters "un-American," when, in fact, these Democratic figures were referring to disruptive tactics that are "diminishing to the process," in Lincoln's words, and are "drowning out opposing views," according to Pelosi and Hoyer. Numerous media figures have similarly claimed that Pelosi and Hoyer called protesters or opponents of health care reform "un-American."

Politico: Blanche Lincoln "call[ed] protesters un-American"

In an August 7 post on the Politico blog The Scorecard, Josh Kraushaar wrote:

Lincoln sorry for calling protesters un-American

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) is backtracking from her comments that protesters who disrupt health care forums are un-American.

She expressed that viewpoint Thursday afternoon after hearing about the angry complaints that Democratic congressmen Mike Ross and Vic Snyder received from constituents at a recent town hall meeting in Little Rock.

"It's so sad, because it's diminishing to the process, it's diminishing to our outcome," Lincoln said on a conference call with reporters. "I think it's sad that they choose to do that. I think it's un-American and disrespectful."

Lincoln, who is up for re-election in a conservative state, quickly clarified her comments -- no doubt concerned that they could be used against her in a campaign.

According to report Politico cited, Lincoln was referring to the "efforts to disrupt town hall meetings," not the protesters themselves. From the August 6 ArkansasNews.com article to which Kraushaar linked:

Efforts to disrupt town hall meetings on health care reform are un-American, U.S. Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., said today, though she later issued a statement retracting the remark.

"It's so sad, because it's diminishing to the process, it's diminishing to our outcome," Lincoln said in a conference call with reporters. "I think it's sad that they choose to do that. I think it's un-American and disrespectful."

A few hours later, Lincoln issued the following statement: "Although I do believe that some of these protesters are disrespectful of other citizens in the audience who truly want to ask questions about health care, I shouldn't have used the term 'un-American.' I support the right of every Arkansan to speak out and have their voices heard. I would just ask that we all continue to work in a constructive way to rebuild our economy and fine-tune out health care system so it works for all of us." [ArkansasNews.com, 8/6/09]

Politico joined numerous media figures in asserting Pelosi, Hoyer "called the protesters 'un-American' "

From an August 10 Politico article:

[Gov. Sonny] Perdue [R-GA] suggested that media coverage of some of the town halls has been overblown, saying what he has seen at the town halls is "democracy in action."

"For some Democratic legislators to call it anti-democratic is just ludicrous," said Perdue, seeming to allude to a column by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) published Monday in USA Today that called the protesters "un-American."

"These are citizens who are very concerned," said Perdue. "They just want answers to their questions."

"To be excoriated for asking those questions is just beyond me," he added. [Politico, 8/10/09]

Pelosi, Hoyer actually wrote: "Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American." From Pelosi and Hoyer's August 10 USA Today op-ed:

[A]s members of Congress spend time at home during August, they are talking with their constituents about reform. The dialogue between elected representatives and constituents is at the heart of our democracy and plays an integral role in assuring that the legislation we write reflects the genuine needs and concerns of the people we represent.

However, it is now evident that an ugly campaign is underway not merely to misrepresent the health insurance reform legislation, but to disrupt public meetings and prevent members of Congress and constituents from conducting a civil dialogue. These tactics have included hanging in effigy one Democratic member of Congress in Maryland and protesters holding a sign displaying a tombstone with the name of another congressman in Texas, where protesters also shouted "Just say no!" drowning out those who wanted to hold a substantive discussion.

Let the facts be heard

These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views -- but of the facts themselves. Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.

Health care is complex. It touches every American life. It drives our economy. People must be allowed to learn the facts. [USA Today, 8/10/09]

CNN contributor Louis debunks claim. After CNN's Lou Dobbs claimed that "we also have now the leadership of the House saying you're un-American to oppose" health care reform, CNN contributor Errol Louis corrected him, stating that "the un-American part was, you know, to shout people down, to stop the conversation is un-American, which I would agree with." Louis continued: "[T]he words in the article were to shut down debate, to use those kind of disruptive tactics to try and stop the debate from going forward, is wrong. It's just wrong. You call it un-American; you call it whatever you want. I mean, it needs to be denounced. You can't have people tarred and feathered in effigy outside of their congressional office or hung in effigy outside of their office. That's not the way to conduct this debate." [Lou Dobbs Tonight, 8/10/09]

Numerous media figures falsely claimed Pelosi and Hoyer called the protesters un-American. Media figures who have done so include: Chuck Todd, Lou Dobbs, Greta Van Susteren, Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson, Gregg Jarrett, and Sean Hannity.

Politico article also uncritically referenced Palin's "death panel" claim based on debunked end-of-life counseling myth

From the August 10 Politico article:

Asked about former Alaska GOP Gov. Sarah Palin's claim last week that the Democratic health care plan is "evil" and would create a "death panel" to decide the fate of children like her youngest son, Trig, who has Down syndrome, the governors chose not to expound on her remark.

"I didn't hear what Gov. Palin said so I can't judge the characterization," said Barbour.

"Gov. Palin can speak for herself," added Perdue.

Palin suggested that under Democratic health care reform, "[M]y baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel.' "

The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's "death panel" so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their "level of productivity in society," whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.

Health care by definition involves life and death decisions. Human rights and human dignity must be at the center of any health care discussion. [Sarah Palin Facebook post, 8/7/09]

Palin's spokesperson reportedly said Palin's assertion was a reference to House bill's "Advance Care Planning Consultation" provision. On his blog, ABC's Jake Tapper reported:

Asked specifically what the former governor was referring to when painting a picture of an Obama "death panel" giving her parents or son Trig a thumbs up or down based on their productivity, Palin spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton responded in an email: "From HR3200 p. 425 see 'Advance Care Planning Consultation'." [Political Punch, 8/7/09]

Provision Stapleton pointed to requires Medicare to cover voluntary end-of-life counseling sessions. Section 1233 of America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 -- which includes "p. 425" -- amends the Social Security Act to ensure that advance care planning will be covered if a patient requests it from a qualified care provider [America's Affordable Health Choices Act, Sec. 1233]. According to an analysis of the bill produced by the three relevant House committees, the section "[p]rovides coverage for consultation between enrollees and practitioners to discuss orders for life-sustaining treatment. Instructs CMS to modify 'Medicare & You' handbook to incorporate information on end-of-life planning resources and to incorporate measures on advance care planning into the physician's quality reporting initiative." [waysandmeans.house.gov, accessed 7/29/09]

Numerous media conservatives have advanced myth that provision provides seniors mandatory counseling to end their lives. On July 16, former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey falsely claimed that the House health care reform bill would "absolutely require" end-of-life counseling for seniors "that will tell them how to end their life sooner." Since then, numerous media figures -- including Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Rush Limbaugh -- have echoed McCaughey's claim -- even after the falsehood was debunked and McCaughey herself backtracked.

Fox News personalities have advanced Palin's "death panel" claim. Although the claim has been repeatedly and widely debunked, Fox News anchors, hosts, and contributors, including Newt Gingrich, Michelle Malkin, Brian Kilmeade, Glenn Beck, and Andrew Napolitano have adopted Palin's "death panel" term or advanced or expressed support for her assertion.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by southerngal (August 12, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
      3 7
      You have to love liberals when they get caught by just originally telling the truth, and when they get caught they backtrack and parse, it's no wonder their followers here do the same thing, including MMfA.

      It's so sad, because it's diminishing to the process, it's diminishing to our outcome," Lincoln said on a conference call with reporters. "I think it's sad that they choose to do that. I think it's un-American and disrespectful."

      Then when caught; oops!

      A few hours later, Lincoln issued the following statement: "Although I do believe that some of these protesters are disrespectful of other citizens in the audience who truly want to ask questions about health care, I shouldn't have used the term 'un-American.' I support the right of every Arkansan to speak out and have their voices heard. I would just ask that we all continue to work in a constructive way to rebuild our economy and fine-tune out health care system so it works for all of us."

      Phony.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (August 12, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
        5  
        That strawman with the label "democrats are stifling the health care debate." Its one of the biggest I've ever seen. Just think if all that effort had gone into the actual debate on health care.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Hasa Diga Eebowai (August 12, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
        2 1
        You have to love liberals when they get caught by just originally telling the truth, and when they get caught they backtrack and parse
        Doth proclaimed the King of Parsers!

        It's unfortunate that all politicians are forced to talk like robots and are rarely allowed to say what they really think. The right-wing likes to talk about political correctness as if it's only a liberal concept. Yet, they traffic in faux outrage whenever someone disparages them. I'd like to coin a new term: Religious Correctness. This is the insistence by fundamentalist religious folks that religion not be questioned or criticized in any way. It's because of this ugly trend that politicians have to virtually trample each other in an attempt to proclaim their religious beliefs more resoundingly.

        What Lincoln said was correct. Her retraction was unnecessary. If Democratic politicians have anything to atone for, it's their unwillingness to meet the enemy on the field of battle even though they are weilding much more mighty weapons. There's a bit of neurotic flavor to the Democratic Party. They are too often willing to internalize the smears of their enemies no matter how slanderous. This is a flaw that Obama himself does not suffer from. That's why I think he's a great role model for how Democrats should comport themselves going forward.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (August 12, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
          2 5
          What Lincoln said was her opinion. I don't agree with it but so what? I agree with you however, with much of what you said above. She should have not apologized for it or tried to alter it. Let the people judge her comments as originally stated as what she really meant, for themselves.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Hasa Diga Eebowai (August 12, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
            4  
            Thank you for your blessing, anointed one. We all wait twittering in anticipation at your every utterance. Having you, the obvious sheriff in these parts, agree with me is an honor that I cannot describe with words.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (August 12, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
        3 2
        Lincoln's original statement was correct. A concerted effort to disrupt a town hall meeting, deliberately preventing exchanges of information, ideas and opinions, IS an un-American goal. That IS NOT the same as saying that the protesters are un-American. It's not even a subtle difference. It's clear to anyone with a moderate level of intelligence. Suggesting an equivalence is extremely dishonest.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (August 12, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
          1 2
          Love the sinner, hate the sin. Right from the pulpit.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Hasa Diga Eebowai (August 12, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
            3 2
            Yep, proving once again that liberals are better at upholding the values espoused by Jesus then the right-wingers are.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by sd_sundevil (August 12, 2009 7:09 pm ET)
                3
              If you are referring to abortion, "social justice" and social engineering via the tax code, I don't think Jesus would side with liberals. He might even be anti-evolution as well, although I'd differ with him on that one.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cArn (August 12, 2009 7:56 pm ET)
                3  
                Unless you're channeling Jesus right now, how do you know what his views on social justice and taxes are? And please don't mention the Bible, because I'll just make up my own interpretation like everyone else seems to do..
                Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (August 12, 2009 7:56 pm ET)
                3  
                You can of course back these opinions up?
                Report Abuse
        • Author by red dem (August 12, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
          1 1
          on the spin cycle now.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (August 12, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
        4 1
        You have to love a lying sock-puppet pompously lecturing everyone else about honesty.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (August 12, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
          1 4
          You've been humiliated by me in recent days on these boards so know you're out to show me a thing or two, aren't you? All you have are insults and nonsense. Grow up.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Hasa Diga Eebowai (August 12, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
            7 1
            You've been humiliated by me in recent days
            Humiliated...you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by clams casino (August 12, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
            4  
            Yeah, I must have missed that too. I can't recall being humiliated in the past few days.

            Delusional, narcissistic, grandiose, hypocritical, dishonest...those aren't insults, just substantiated observations.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (August 12, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
            5  
            You've been humiliated by me in recent days on these boards so know you're out to show me a thing or two, aren't you?


            You and your elitist FIVE sylable words!

            Sorry, who was recently humiliated on this site?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by BillJ-MN (August 12, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
              3  
              There have been instances of self-humiliation, but I don't think they were recognized by the perpetrators.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Old_Benjamin (August 12, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
                   
                Thanks for reminding me of the drunk posts if left;)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Old_Benjamin (August 12, 2009 7:04 pm ET)
                     
                  like this one -

                  s/b Thanks for reminding me of the drunk posts i've left;)
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 12, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
        5  
        She was right. It is un-American to shout down your fellow citizens to keep them from participating in a townhall setting. Frankly, even for you rightOn, I am suprised to hear that you do not think it is un-American. But, I guess when you spend all your time caught up worrying about liberals, sometimes maybe you forget your own principles.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.