About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NPR's Cornish ignored CBO's much lower estimate of health care bill's cost

August 26, 2009 12:50 pm ET — 5 Comments

On August 25, NPR's Audie Cornish reported that the House Democrats' health care reform proposal "is estimated to cost a trillion dollars over the next 10 years," without noting that the Congressional Budget Office has concluded that this cost would be largely offset by the savings and revenue increases in the bill. Taking these provisions into account, CBO estimated that the House bill would increase the deficit by $239 billion over 10 years, less than a quarter of the cost Cornish reported.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the August 25 edition of NPR's All Things Considered:

SEN. OLYMPIA SNOWE (D-ME): What we have to do is develop a plan that's going to be -- you know, available for people on an affordable basis, and, secondly, containing costs both for the American consumer and the American taxpayer.

CORNISH: Snowe says the bipartisan group has moved away from offering a public insurance option and moved toward an option based on the regional health cooperatives found in the Midwest. And they are more determined than ever to present something less expensive than the House proposal, which is estimated to cost a trillion dollars over the next 10 years.

CBO: House bill would increase deficit by $239 billion -- not $1 trillion

CBO estimated House health care reform bill would increase deficit by $239 billion -- not $1 trillion. In its July 17 cost estimate of the bill as introduced, CBO explained that its "estimate reflects a projected 10-year cost of the bill's insurance coverage provisions of $1,042 billion, partly offset by net spending changes that CBO estimates would save $219 billion over the same period, and by revenue provisions that [the Joint Committee on Taxation] estimates would increase federal revenues by about $583 billion over those 10 years." CBO thus concluded the legislation "would result in a net increase in the federal budget deficit of $239 billion over the 2010-2019 period."

Despite lower CBO estimate, media repeatedly claim bill would "cost" $1 trillion

Numerous media figures and outlets falsely claimed bill would cost $1 trillion.

  • In an August 3 article, the Associated Press falsely claimed that "even the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says" health reform bills "with the elements Obama wants would add around $1 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years."
  • On the August 2 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson asserted that the House bill "has a $1 trillion price tag over 10 years." Host Chris Wallace replied by suggesting that Liasson's statement was "true."
  • During the July 29 edition of Fox News' Hannity, Fox News political contributor Karl Rove claimed that House Democrats were "planning on a 1 trillion, 420 billion -- 420 million dollar price tag of additional spending over the next 10 years."
  • On July 28, The New York Times falsely reported that the House health care reform bill is estimated to cost "$1 trillion over 10 years."
  • During the July 27 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, CNBC host Maria Bartiromo falsely asserted that the health care reform proposal under consideration in Congress would cost a "trillion dollars over 10 years."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by right ON (August 26, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
         
      As if. Considering our deficit is now going to be 2 trillion dollars more than we were told previously by this administration, I don't much trust any numbers coming out of Washington anymore. So for MMfA to keep harping on this is ridiculous. We will probably end up being lucky if health costs only 1 trillion over the next 10 years.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (August 26, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
           
        Easily possible with the status quo. With reform not so much.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (August 26, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
         
      Cost=Spending
      not Spending minus New Revenue
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Craig (August 26, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
           
        If you're reporting on the cost of the bill, you also need to report on the savings and increased revenue.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.