About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

From its glass house, Fox News attacks ABC, NBC for refusing to run anti-health reform ad

August 28, 2009 12:07 pm ET — 18 Comments

A FoxNews.com article reported that the "refusal by ABC and NBC to run a national ad critical of President Obama's health care reform plan is raising questions from the group behind the spot -- particularly in light of ABC's health care special aired in prime time last June and hosted at the White House." Fox News, however, previously refused to air ads critical of the Bush administration, to which it had "unprecedented access."

Fox News: Ad refusal is "raising questions"

Article quotes Dick Morris on ABC's "chutzpah." Fox News contributor Dick Morris also said of ABC's refusal to air the ad: "It's the ultimate act of chutzpah because ABC is the network that turned itself over completely to Obama for a daylong propaganda fest about health care reform." From the August 27 FoxNews.com article:

The refusal by ABC and NBC to run a national ad critical of President Obama's health care reform plan is raising questions from the group behind the spot -- particularly in light of ABC's health care special aired in prime time last June and hosted at the White House.

[...]

Dick Morris, a FOX News political analyst and the League of American Voters' chief strategist, conceptualized the advertisement and said its purpose was to "refocus" the debate on health care reform.

"I feel the whole debate on health care reform needed to be refocused on the issue of Medicare," he told FOXNews.com. "Most of the debate had been on issues of socialized medicine and cost. I felt that the impact of the legislation in cutting the Medicare program and enforcing rationing needed to be addressed."

Morris, a onetime advisor to former President Bill Clinton, said he was particularly troubled by ABC's decision not to air the spot.

"It's the ultimate act of chutzpah because ABC is the network that turned itself over completely to Obama for a daylong propaganda fest about health care reform," he said. "For them to be pious and say they will not accept advertising on health care shuts their viewers out from any possible understanding of both sides of this issue." [FoxNews.com, 8/27/09]

Fox News refused to air anti-Bush ads, boasted of White House access

Ads criticizing torture, Alito were refused. As Media Matters for America noted, Fox News previously refused to air an ad produced by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) that criticized the Bush administration for "destroying the Constitution" through the use of renditions, torture, and other tactics. In an email provided to Media Matters by CCR, Fox News account executive Erin Kelly told the center's e-communications manager that Fox would not run the ad, but said that "[i]f you have documentation that it [the Constitution] is indeed being destroyed, we can look at that." Additionally, in 2005, Fox News refused to run an ad critical of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who then-President Bush had nominated to succeed retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Fox News boasted of its "unprecedented access" to Bush White House. Morris is just the latest Fox News personality to attack ABC for its June 24 exclusive prime-time special, "Questions for the President: Prescription for America. During the Bush years, however, Fox News made much of its "unprecedented access" to the White House, using that access to ask softball questions of Bush administration officials and run specials about the administration.

For instance:

  • During an exclusive interview with Bush on the June 8, 2005, edition of Fox News' Your World, host Neil Cavuto asked Bush questions such as: "Almost any objective read tells you that we're still doing very, very well. ... Do you think you get a bum rap in the media on the economy?" and "Do you ever get mad at your fellow Republicans?" As Media Matters noted at the time, Media Research Center president L. Brent Bozell III defended Cavuto from criticism that he had lobbed "softball" questions to Bush, asserting that Bush was asked "some challenging questions" and that the interview "was no puff job."
  • Similarly, Cavuto's July 31, 2006, exclusive interview with Bush also featured softballs, false assertions, and a failure on Cavuto's part to ask any substantive questions regarding the Iraq war, as Media Matters documented. In addition, Cavuto rarely challenged Bush's answers, including Bush's claim that "I think about Al Qaeda every day" -- even though he previously asserted that he was "not that concerned" about Osama bin Laden. After the interview, Cavuto repeatedly praised the president and his ability to withstand the Miami humidity, telling Fox News' Brian Wilson that Bush "was dry as toast" and "looked great."
  • On February 16, 2006, then-Vice President Dick Cheney granted his first interview after accidentally shooting a hunting companion in the face to Fox News' Brit Hume. As Media Matters noted, in airing the interview, Fox omitted Cheney's comments about drinking a beer the day he shot his hunting companion, Harry Whittington, and even excluded the comments from what it said was the "full interview" posted on its website. Yet, on the February 19, 2006, edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Hume gave himself high marks for the manner in which he had conducted the interview, saying, "The last thing in the world that Dick Cheney needed on that day was a soft interview," and "my job was to simply sit there and walk through this episode with him and ask all the relevant questions."

Moreover, Hume neglected to ask a number of "relevant" questions, as Media Matters noted. For example, Cheney appeared to accept responsibility for shooting Whittington ("Well, ultimately, I'm the guy who pulled the trigger"), but Hume failed to ask Cheney why he allowed surrogates -- without challenging or correcting them -- to publicly blame Whittington for the accident.

  • On September 30, 2006, Fox aired a special on then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, titled "Why He Fights," which promised to "examine why President Bush stands behind him and what drives the 73-year-old Rumsfeld to soldier on." In a "Reporter's Notebook" entry on the documentary, Bret Baier, who interviewed Rumsfeld, wrote: "[F]or me, Rumsfeld continues to be one of the most fascinating figures in President Bush's war cabinet." He continued: "At 74 years old, he is a self-made millionaire many times over. He once served as the nation's youngest defense secretary --- now he's the oldest. So what keeps him going? What makes him continue to fight?"

Baier further described the special as a "series of one-on-one interviews with Rumsfeld that took place over the course of several months," adding: "I traveled with Rumsfeld to Iraq numerous times, spoke with him at the Pentagon, and even rode along with him as he traveled to and from the White House."

  • On the October 16, 17, and 18, 2006, editions of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly aired portions of his October 16 interview with Bush, which consisted of such "tough questions" as whether then-Sen. Hillary Clinton is "soft on terrorism," whether "the anti-Bush press" is responsible for popular opposition to the war, and whether Bush was aware that critics "are trying to destroy you." O'Reilly also asked Bush: "[Y]ou work hard, right?"

In his introduction to the October 16 interview segment, O'Reilly stated that "[b]ecause every presidential interview is finite," he would concentrate on "what is happening now." Absent from the interview, O'Reilly stated, would be any questions that "look back," because, "[w]hat good does it do to rehash WMDs?" According to the onscreen text, "Looking back doesn't do anybody any good."

  • On October 13, 2007, Fox News aired "Dick Cheney: No Retreat," which was described as "an exclusive interview" with Cheney and teased as "a rare glimpse into the life of the vice president."
  • On February 2 and February 3, 2008, Fox News aired a documentary titled, "George W. Bush: Fighting to the Finish," after, as Fox itself described, Baier "was granted unprecedented access by George W. Bush as the president begins the final year of his extraordinarily consequential tenure."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by BillJ-MN (August 28, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
      5 2
      Running the ad in question goes against a policy that ABC has long had in place. An interview with the President is nothing like an advertisement.

      NBC has contacted the group putting out the ad requesting substantiation for claims made in the ad. The group has declined to provide that substantiation.

      And, in conclusion, Dick Morris is a clown.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zapperz (August 28, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
      1 6


      Who said NBC contacted them? I want truth, so please state who you talked to and who they called behind that ad. As we all know, anyone can say anything, but with out any fact of who contacted whom, are you not doing the same as FOX?

      We need the truth from all. Example, Obama says when you loose your job you loose healthcare, but what about Cobra???? I lost my job and health care and got insurance through Cobra, so thats not true. Obama needs to be more truthful
      Report Abuse
      • Author by funnymanpants (August 28, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
        4  
        >>Example, Obama says when you loose your job you loose healthcare, but what about Cobra???? I lost my job and health care and got insurance through Cobra, so thats not true. Obama needs to be more truthful

        What Obama said is truthful. Generally, you do lose your health insurance when you lose your job. I don't know about your particular case, but I can't imagine most companies continuing to pay your health insurance when you no longer work for them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dr. matt (August 28, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
          6  
          Yes, you do lose your health care coverage when you leave your job. COBRA is a temporary health plan and is not permanent coverage. YOU should be more truthful.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by MDin2012UIC (August 28, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
            2  
            Not only that, but COBRA is extremely expensive. It would have been out of my reach every time I left a job. Fortunately I get health care from my school, but over the summer I have to fend for myself or hope I don't get sick.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by steelers84 (August 28, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
            3  
            COBRA is also very expensive, which is a problem, when, you know, you've just LOST YOUR JOB!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by redaestcyr5306 (August 30, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
             
          Obama was right. Cobra is only a temp measure idiot, so stop trying to dismiss the fact you and the idiots you follow are fighting a losing battle and in the end, you will be left out in the cold, with the rest of the nuts who drink the right wing kool aide
          Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (August 28, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
        3  
        Who said NBC contacted them? I want truth, so please state who you talked to and who they called behind that ad. - zapperz

        Here is one source.

        NBC responded to a Fox inquiry by saying it would consider running the 30-second ad if it were revised.

        "We have not rejected the ad. We have communicated with the media agency about some factual claims that require additional substantiation. As always, we are happy to reconsider the ad once these issues are addressed," said NBC spokeswoman Liz Fischer.

        COBRA is short term and fairly expensive, which is a consideration for someone who finds himself unemployed.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by RealTruthseeker (August 28, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
        3  
        And you paid for the portion that the company picked up. And you only get to keep it for a certain amount of time.

        After that, if you have not found another job... or other coverage... you have no insurance. And chances of finding other coverage without getting pinged with pre-existing conditions is minute.

        So therefore, if you're saying Obama needs to be more truthful... so must you.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (August 28, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
      3 1
      First thing, O'Rilley shouldn't be included in the commentary.
      Anyone with any sense at all understands that he is an "entertainer", has a biased view point, and will go out of his way to slander anyone he doesn't agree with. The only people crazier than Bill"o are the people who watch his show and actually believe the bile he spews.

      As far as the rest, what hits me the most is that of all these "journalists" who were given such "unprecidented" access to Bush, Chenney, and Rumsfield spoiled the perfect oportunity to actually practice the art of "journalism". You don't have to slam someone or ask them "tough" questions to get to the truth. Just ask them what everyone else wants to know.
      "Why did you really go into Iraq?"
      "Why is waterboarding no longer considered torture"
      The had access no one else was granted and they wasted it.
      "OOh, I am so excited to be near someone great. I think I wet myself."
      Of course, I think we all know that, if they had asked the "tough" questions, they wouldn't have had any more access than the rest of the networks got.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (August 28, 2009 2:11 pm ET)
      2  
      No business has to accept an advertisement from anyone just as advertisers don't have to advertise on a program.

      More bs.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by BobsYourUncle (August 28, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
        2  
        Sure COBRA offers continued cover but at several times what you would have paid through your empolyer.
        Mine would have gone from $500 a month to $1200 a month if i had taken it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by joedla1117 (August 31, 2009 10:10 am ET)
             
          The rules of Cobra are: The monthly rate is set at the total monthly rate that the employer, and yourself(if any) were paying plus a small allowable administrative fee (usually about 1%). This will vary depending on the plan and the company. The older companies with older employees, generally pay much higher that newer companies with younger employees. Also it often does not include dental(that is usally a seperate Cobra),or many other riders. I did a comparison some time ago between my job and my wifes. My cobra cost would have been almost double my wife's for exactly the same coverage through the same provider. Mine would have been higher than yours, 7 years ago.
          Most people that lose their job or retire can not afford this.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (August 28, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
        2  
        Looks like some right-wing billionaires put together a commercial full of lies and smears...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ropertex (August 28, 2009 8:22 pm ET)
      2  
      Here are some news headlines from the past 8 years that come up on Google....

      Anti-Bush ads refused as “too inflammatory”

      Local Fox Station Bans Anti-Bush Ad

      Networks reject anti-Bush ads

      NBC Rejected Dixie Chicks Ad Because It Is Too Anti-Bush

      CBS Censorship At Super Bowl? Network Bars MoveOn.org commercial

      Think Progress » NBC, CBS, ABC Reject Ad Criticizing Bush Policies

      ABC refuses to air anti-war ad before Bush visit

      ABC Refuses to Run Al Gore's Commercial That Critiques Oil Companies.

      RNC tells TV stations not to run anti-Bush ads
      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (August 28, 2009 10:22 pm ET)
          2
        your point?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (August 29, 2009 10:24 pm ET)
           
        Here is another, and the Times proudly ran this one, for a reduced rate to boot...
        MoveOn.org Ad Takes Aim at Petraeus
        http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Decision2008/story?id=3581727&page=1

        And they wonder why they have no credibility.

        The report pointed out the Times printed 3,200 corrections last year.

        The Pew Research Center study found 45 percent of Americans believe little or nothing of what they read in daily newspapers. Some 14 percent said they believe almost nothing they read in the New York Times.
        http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44176

        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 31, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
             
          and your point Ms. Paris Business Review! And YOU wonder why you have no crediblity here?
          Report Abuse