About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Glenn Beck no stranger to conspiracy theories or incendiary rhetoric

September 04, 2009 5:44 pm ET — 93 Comments

Fox News host Glenn Beck has become notorious for his conspiracy theories and incendiary rhetoric. Among other things, he has flirted with the idea that FEMA is building detention camps, suggested that President Obama is purposefully "tanking" the economy to force young people to work for ACORN and AmeriCorps, and said that Obama and former President George W. Bush are "moving us away from our republic and into a system of fascism."

Beck flirts with the idea that FEMA is building detention camps

Beck: "I can't debunk" FEMA camps conspiracy theory. In March, Beck stated: "We are a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism, beyond your wildest imagination. I have to tell you, I'm doing a story tonight that I wanted to debunk these FEMA camps." Beck further stated: "I'm tired of hearing -- I wanted to debunk them. Well, we've now for several days done research on them. I can't debunk them. And we're going to carry the story tonight. ... [I]t is our government. If you trust our government, it's fine. If you have any kind of fear that we might be headed towards a totalitarian state, look out, buckle up. There is something going on in our country that is -- ain't good." [Fox News' Fox & Friends, 3/3/09] (Beck eventually managed to "debunk" this theory.)

Beck fearmongers that Obama is "genius architect" bent on forcing people to work for ACORN, AmeriCorps

Beck says Obama "wants you to work as a bureaucratic slave to government." From the July 24 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: Well, if the jobs never go away, then why don't you we just raise the minimum wage to $50 an hour? How about $100 an hour? How about $1,000 an hour? That should solve some issues, right? Of course not.

That's why economists are estimating -- wait a minute, the same economists that we're supposed to be listening to about bailing people out? I'm not sure we should listen to them. They're estimating that at least 300,000 jobs will be lost due to the minimum wage hike. That's huge considering that only 2.8 million workers in America earn the minimum wage.

So, why would Obama support a policy that directly hurts young people -- especially nearly half of African-American teenagers, who are already unemployed? Well, it makes sense if you're trying to transform America.

When Obama comes out and says the stimulus is working as planned while the economy is tanking, people assume he's either an idiot or he's lying. I don't think he's either. I think the man is a genius architect, quite frankly, and on this particular case, he's telling the truth.

What happens when kids can't get a job? They become discouraged, disenfranchised. They look for somewhere to land, and guess who's now there to swoop in? President Obama -- tonight, strangely, in these really long jeans -- President Obama and his new government program -- programs and community service organizations, not just AmeriCorps -- not just ACORN, but now AmeriCorps.

Do you remember Michelle Obama's words on the campaign trail?

MICHELLE OBAMA [audio clip]: Barack Obama will require you to work. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual -- uninvolved, uninformed.

BECK: "Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual." Are we to believe that she's kidding or just haphazardly stringing words together and they came out in a sentence?

These people are steering our youth into community service. Ted Kennedy and his ilk are even pushing the idea of forced mandatory service. They're incentivizing working for the government with promises now of paying off college loans -- we told you this last night.

Of course, the catch is you have to -- you have to federalize your loan before they'll pay it. He wants you to work as a bureaucratic slave to government. You work for them for 10 years, and you don't have to worry about any debt for education.

Maybe I'm crazy for going down this road, but from what we already know about Washington, the truth is always stranger than fiction, and the sooner we realize that, the faster we're going to be able to stop and go down the road paved with a couple of bricks of common sense.[Fox News' Glenn Beck, 7/24/09]

Beck: Maybe Treasury is "selling black-market bonds." Discussing the reports of "two middle aged guys with Japanese passports who were stopped by Italian police after trying to enter Switzerland with $134.5 billion worth of U.S. treasury bonds," Beck said, "And this story has not been in The New York Times yet. That's weird, isn't it? That's why we're left with speculation." Among the possible "scenarios" that Beck explored was the possibility that "[t]he treasury or the Federal Reserve is selling black-market bonds or double-dealing some way or another." Beck explained:

And the fourth one [scenario] is really troubling. The treasury or the Federal Reserve is selling black-market bonds or double-dealing some way or another. Maybe because they know of the possible deflation of the dollar, they just can't -- they just can't sell this many bonds.

OK. The worst is if we're running another set of books. We are already running four sets of books in Washington, D.C., why would that surprise anybody? Hopefully, it's just keystone cops, but we don't know. These are guesses. No one is answering questions.

And if this story just dies, mark my word, America. Two years from now, when our dollar really starts to lose its value and we can't sell our bonds because we have too much debt and none of this stuff happen, it was keystone cops, this conspiracy theory will gain power. [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 6/19/09 (transcript from the Nexis database)]

Beck imitates Obama pouring gasoline on "average American"; says, "President Obama, why don't you just set us on fire?" From the April 9 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: So what does Obama do, he says, boy, I'm not -- I'm just out of stuff to do. What else could I possibly do to the American people?

President Obama, why don't you just set us on fire? For the love of Pete, what are you doing? Do you not hear -- do you not hear the cries of people who are saying stop? We would like some sanity in our country for a second!

We didn't vote to lose the republic. We didn't vote for any of this stuff. We voted for change.

[...]

BECK: We can disagree with each other on policies, but Good Lord Almighty, man, please. Some of us don't agree with all of the policies. We'd like to have a country left in the end of four years. No need to set us on fire. [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 4/9/09]

beckgas

Beck sees fascism and communism everywhere

Beck: U.S. government under Bush and Obama moving us "into a system of fascism." Beck said: "I am not saying that Barack Obama is a fascist. I'm not saying the Democrats are a fascist. I'm saying the government under Bush and under Obama and under -- under all of the presidents that we've seen, or at least most of the presidents that we've seen for quite some time, are slowly but surely moving us away from our republic and into a system of fascism." [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 4/1/09]

Beck on health care: "This system is going to come out the other side dictorial -- it's going to come out a fascist state." Beck told a caller: "Let me tell you something, the end game ... for Congress and this president -- and I don't know how many members of Congress even realize the game that they are either being used in or a pawn in. But believe me, they'll take ... the universal health care coverage over what ... skin they do have in it. They're going to come out -- this system is going to come out the other side dictorial [sic] -- it is going to come out a fascist state." [Premiere Radio Network's The Glenn Beck Program, 7/27/09]

Beck: "You have the artwork of Mussolini there, here in New York at Rockefeller Plaza." Beck analyzed the artwork decorating Rockefeller Plaza, and concluded, "So you have the hammer and the sickle. You have the artwork to Mussolini there, here in New York at Rockefeller Plaza." Beck said of a decoration on the Rockefeller building:

So, let's just take it piece by piece, and I'll show you what this means.

First, the sun. The sun represents the bright tomorrow. Right here, underneath the boy, here is the sun. Show me the boy. This is the youth. The next one is the youth here, leading the way. Notice he is ahead of the horses. He's leading the way into the bright future of tomorrow.

Now, this man standing on a chariot, the wheel. The wheel is always representative of industry in any of these progressive pictures or paintings or artwork. So you've got the wheel. Now, let's go to the horses, please. He is standing on a chariot. You've got the industry and the engines of industry, but who's in the back here?

Let's show you his hand. This man's strong hand is holding on to the reins tightly here, holding back the engines of industry being led into the bright future of tomorrow by a young boy. Who is this? Who is this?

This is the strong leader taking that -- using that industry and those machines to lead us into the bright future led by our children. Gee, who's having indoctrination next week? Oh, yeah, that's right. The president. Completely unrelated.

This represents, at the time this was made, Mussolini. This was Mussolini. By the way, the artist that made this -- his son, ironically and tragically died fighting the army of Mussolini years after this was made. This still is up in Rockefeller Plaza.

So you have the hammer and the sickle. You have the artwork to Mussolini there, here in New York at Rockefeller Plaza. [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 9/2/09]

Beck claims Obama's "civilian national security force" is "what Hitler did with the SS," "what Saddam Hussein" did. Discussing Obama's "civilian national security force," Beck said, "I'm finding this -- this is the hardest part to connect to, because this is -- I mean, look, you know, David [Bellavia, former Army staff sergeant], what you just said is, you said, "I'm not comparing" -- but you are. I mean, this is what Hitler did with the SS. He had his own people. He had the brownshirts and then the SS. This is what Saddam Hussein -- so -- but you are comparing that. And I -- I mean, I think America would have a really hard time getting their arms around that." [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 8/27/09]

As Media Matters for America has repeatedly noted, Obama's comments about the necessity of a "civilian national security force" came from a July 2, 2008, speech on service and referred to expanding the foreign service, AmeriCorps, and the Peace Corps.

From Obama's July 2, 2008, speech in Colorado Springs, Colorado:

Today, AmeriCorps -- our nation's network of local, state, and national service programs -- has 75,000 slots. And I know firsthand the quality of these programs. My wife, Michelle, once left her job at a law firm and at City Hall to be a founding director of an AmeriCorps program in Chicago that trains young people for careers in public service. And these programs invest Americans in their communities and their country. They tap America's greatest resource -- our citizens.

And that's why as president, I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their efforts connected to a common purpose. People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem -- they are the answer.

So we are going to send -- we're going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We'll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, to be there for our military families. And we're going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

Beck suggests health care reform designed as a system of backdoor reparations

Beck says all of Obama's policies rooted in "reparations." Beck said, "Everything that is getting pushed through Congress, including this health care bill, are transforming America. And they are all driven by President Obama's thinking on one idea: reparations." Beck later added that Obama's "goal is creating a new America, a new model, a model that will settle old racial scores through new social justice." [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 7/23/09]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (September 04, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
      12 4
      Glen Beck!
      Journalism's Train Wreck.
      His fear of "The Other" is so Palpable.
      His lack of intelligence is so incontrovertible.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
      • Author by angryofmayfair61 (September 04, 2009 8:53 pm ET)
           
        You have skipped the part where Beck says the FEMA camps are false.

        Can you explain how Obama isnt holding up his oath ?

        "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic"

        He has a communist working for him; he takes over GM and fires the CEO;fired an Independent Inspector General;"Hate Speech" legislation to prevent religious teachings. Lets leave ACORM and Apollo Alliance and Tides for a later date.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by BrianBeach (September 06, 2009 11:01 am ET)
           
        THANK GOD somebody filters replies in order to maintain free speech in America!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 04, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
         
      "Beck sees fascism and communism everywhere"...

      It appears to me that he is only trying to push his agenda, which seems to be the exclusion from government what he views to be dangerous political thoughts, leaving only what he deems acceptable.

      Where do you stop? If you exclude Communists, where do you draw the line with Socialists, and then with Democrats, or members of the Green Party. Beck is the new McCarthy.

      Conservatives are playing a dangerous game with politics, that threatens our entire system.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by boniknik (September 04, 2009 8:10 pm ET)
         
      I'm speechless. This guy is really a nut... I don't see how people can believe all the crazy things he talk about.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (September 04, 2009 8:13 pm ET)
      10 1
      Bravo Beck!
      You do your duty-do to
      Keep America Stupid!

      Glen–Boy!
      The veritable, patented–shlub,
      Foisting this neurotic, inane rhetoric — his massless mess to
      Keep America Stupid!

      Beck, the manly–man Glen!
      The string-less puppet of unseen forces, bent-on exorbitant profits while draining our country of everything decent, worthwhile, iltelligent and good.
      You, Glen Beck, Keep America Stupid!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nativeofsf (September 04, 2009 8:18 pm ET)
        5 1

        Bravo Beck!
        You do your duty-do to
        Keep America Stupid!

        Glen-Boy!
        The veritable, patented shlub,
        Foisting this neurotic, inane rhetoric -- his massless mess to
        Keep America Stupid!

        Beck, the manly-man Glen!
        The string-less puppet of unseen forces, bent-on exorbitant profits while draining our country of everything decent, worthwhile, iltelligent and good.
        You, Glen Beck...Keep America Stupid!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jonesjax2374 (September 04, 2009 8:56 pm ET)
          6 1
          He should have the decency to wear a Bozo costume at least.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kurios (September 04, 2009 9:10 pm ET)
              1
            at least he has the decency to do some research before he comments... lets see what you got to "debunk" him...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by nativeofsf (September 04, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
            5  
            Actually, Bozo the Clown is a time-honored American clown, known to many
            in the business, especially those at the Ringling Brothers' Barnum & Bailey Circus, Clown College. He's an American institution.

            You were probably thinking of Ronald McDullard and his B.A.
            >No self-respecting clown would ever have red above the upper lip!
            It's not American!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ted92114 (September 07, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
               
            Defamation. A communist tactic.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (September 04, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
      7  
      Hey, he is doing his job being an "entertainer". Anyone who thinks he speaks for "real Americans" does not have a firm grip on reality. Are there people out there who believe Beck? Yup, just like there are people who believe the earth is flat.

      Beck: "I can't debunk" FEMA camps conspiracy theory.
      And I can't debunk the fact that the FEMA camps are actually for crazy right wing talk show hosts.

      Beck: "These people are steering our youth into community service."
      And of course that is a "bad" thing. Kind of like all those right wing repubs who are into community service. (senator and representatives)

      I could go on but; why bother.
      Crazy man spewing crazy ideas in the hope of finding an audience and staying on the air.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by diamonds (September 04, 2009 11:23 pm ET)
         
      Actually, I recall Rahm Emmanual saying there would be a mandatory civil service of some sort. I have heard the entire speech Obama gave, the context doesn't change anything. It is pretty clear he means a domestic service of some sort. How you could mean anything else in the context of saying "national security objectives" or "national security force"? Neither of the links clarifies this. It isn't any more comforting knowing that the speech was scripted, too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jstephens005 (September 04, 2009 11:37 pm ET)
      5 23
      Crazy stuff. Kinda like Olbermann. Kinda like Maddow. Kinda like Schultz.

      Crazy.

      Too bad this site doesn't report the whole story...

      But, I guess it wouldn't be as easy for whack job progressives to pile on if they did...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (September 05, 2009 2:23 am ET)
        11 1
        and what about his new one. indicoctrination? hmm? boy thats really crazy right?

        what more to the story than beck is insane is there to be had. the stuff he has said is patently untrue but because he is a ratings whore, he sells his soul anyway.

        and now with this new one of his about the upcoming school speech he has shown himself to support anti intellectualisim. and by extension so are you since your plugging for him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mookie von zipper (September 05, 2009 2:28 am ET)
        2 18
        media matters' mission statement is to combat conservative misinformation... apparently, liberal or so called progressive incendiary rhetoric doesn't exist... a more accurate name for this site would be "political correctness matters"...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (September 05, 2009 7:55 am ET)
          7  
          Well, you read the mission statement.

          If you want to expose the "craziness" of Maddow, Olberman, et all, please start your own site. This site never proposed to give the "whole story".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mookie von zipper (September 05, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
            1 14
            tell that to jstephens... i wouldn't waste the pixels on my site with crap about msnbc... besides, since their ratings are in the tank, it's not necessary... if a liberal whines in the forest and no one hears it, is it whining?... i'm merely pointing out to him the futility of expecting media matters to be fair, their occasional issues with chris matthews notwithstanding... but i do stand by my assessment of the majority of the content found here, which is a whiny diatribe of political correctness and a piling on of every little seeming transgression of conservative pundits, which takes away from the strength of calling out truly egregious behavior...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by TheDayV (September 05, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
              3  
              What would you call "truly egregious behaviour"?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mookie von zipper (September 05, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
                1 14
                egregious: don imus' remark about the syracuse women's basketball team.

                innocent mistake: female golf commentator's lynching remark about tiger woods.

                egregious: rosie o'donnel's demeaning asian gibberish on "the view".

                intellectual honesty: o'reilly on illegal immigration.

                the latter is continually cherry-picked by media matters, who would rather gloss o'reilly a racist than engage in honest debate.

                now we have van jones... he's a timely example confirming obama likes to associate himself with racists (jones, wright), communists (jones) and terrorists (ayers)...







                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
                  8  
                  Don Imus is a registered Republican with conservative leanings, as is his wife. Bad analogy.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mookie von zipper (September 05, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
                    1 7
                    it's not an analogy, it's an answer to a simple question...

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 06, 2009 1:08 am ET)
                      7 2
                      It was no answer at all, posted by a simpleton.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by TruthHound2009 (September 07, 2009 10:12 am ET)
                        1  
                        It can be very frustrating trying to learn opposing views on sites like this.... when someone is trying to have an intellectually honest debate they usually end up being called a name and their point of view is immediately dismissed. Grow UP!

                        Liberals tout themselves as inclusive to everybody...truly you are only inclusive with people with the same ideology as yours.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by ted92114 (September 07, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
                           
                        Defamation... the Communists tactic
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by mookie von zipper (September 07, 2009 12:35 pm ET)
                        1 2
                        "easy to refute wingnuts"?... when all you have at your disposal is playground name calling, sure it's easy...

                        Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
                  10 2
                  Bill O'Reilly is not honest about anything and intellectually, he's a peanut-brain.

                  As I said, you are not a conservative, you are a groupie who is being played for a fool by Fox.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 05, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
                    11  
                    Do you really want to argue with somebody who used the term "intellectual honesty" to describe BilldO?

                    Mookie is showing the traits of the Ratings Queen, the Bizarro World Racist, and the stuck-in-the 50s Red Scare paranoid.

                    Stir in a little guilt by association that goes back 40 or 50 years, and I think it's pretty clear you're trying to reason with a Zombie.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by worrierking (September 05, 2009 7:44 pm ET)
                      9  
                      That's a dead giveaway.

                      Anyone who rants about Bill O'Really's "intellectual honesty" and ratings has to be a Foxflunky.

                      And Beck has no comparison on the whole planet. He's a pea brained douchebag who shares his warped delusions with sad little people like Mookie.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by mookie von zipper (September 05, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
                    3 8
                    i'm sorry, did you say something?... i was busy watching fox so i will know what to think...

                    Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
              2  
              Please see my response to your idiocy below.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mookie von zipper (September 05, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
                  12
                i know what makes me a conservative... it sure as heck isn't trading barbs online with nincompoops calling me an idiot because i don't share their ideological views...

                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
                  10  
                  Exactly, I'm a conservative, and your comments here indicate that you are simply a Fox/hate radio groupie . . . you don't share my political ideological views nor those of the majority of REAL conservatives.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by New Frontier (September 05, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
                  11  
                  "i know what makes me a conservative... it sure as heck isn't trading barbs online"


                  No, no. It's obvious what makes you a conservative is that you share the same, exact views as Glenn Beck. That's just obvious, because you're here to deflect criticsm of Beck by saying 'hey look over there, Ed Schultz said a bad thing once and Media Matters didn't report it.'

                  You believe there are FEMA concentration camps, that people will be forced to work for ACORN, and that the President of the U.S. hates white people. Anyone who rejected those absurdities would be mortally embarrassed to in any way come here and make excuses for Glenn Beck.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (September 06, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
                    6  
                    But, people who believe that nonsense are NOT conservatives, they are simply groupies. Most of them have no clue whatsoever what the terms "conservative" and "liberal" even mean. They just know that they agree with and watch Fox and listen to Rush, therefore, they are "conservative," and anyone who disagrees with them HAS to be a {{{{{shudder}}}}} liberal. No conservatism, just blind, unthinking followers.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 06, 2009 1:10 am ET)
                  6 2
                  i know what makes me a conservative...
                  In your case, it was probably a lack of oxygen at birth.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (September 07, 2009 12:27 am ET)
                  3 1
                  i know what makes me a conservative... it sure as heck isn't trading barbs online...


                  Apparently it is, because that's all you've done so far. I've yet to see reasoned discussion.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne1 (September 07, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
                    3  
                    If you call asserting that Ted Nugent would be much better at the presidency than BO, then Mookie has had a reasoned discussion....ha! He has already proven he's an intellectual light weight.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by ReasonAndResolve (September 05, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
              4 1
              Of course, you fail to realize that liberals watch everything BUT Fox - which means that the FoxBots are well outnumbered. We really don't care abut MSNBC's ratings so much. We just add MSNBC, CNN, HLN, CBS, NBC, and ABC - and you zombies are well and truly in the margin.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (September 07, 2009 12:24 am ET)
              2  
              i wouldn't waste the pixels on my site with crap about msnbc...


              I'm with you, I wouldn't waste pixels on your site either. It's full of crap...
              Report Abuse
            • Author by ted92114 (September 07, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                 
              Amen brother
              Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
          8 1
          Actually, MMFA has gone after so-called "progressive" programs and sites in the past when they have made ridiculously stupid comments. Fox and hate talk radio just happen to have many, many, many more ridiculously stupid comments.

          BTW, these folks aren't conservatives, you know. Agreeing with their nonsense doesn't make you a conservative, just makes you a groupie.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ted92114 (September 07, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
             
          Media Matters job is defamation...a communistic tactic
          Report Abuse
      • Author by National_Insecurity (September 05, 2009 3:16 am ET)
        13 5
        You've actually watched Rachel Maddow's show all the way through? Care to describe it?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 05, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
          10 1
          Har! That's sweet, NI, you got three thumbs down for asking a Fox Fan to back up his BS. You obviously aren't familiar with The World According to Wingnuts and its rules.

          Never, ever ask them to join you in reality.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by moe (September 05, 2009 7:20 am ET)
        10  
        I know what you mean. It's hard to imagine that there are people (probably those Fascist, Commmie, Socialist, Militant, Revolutionary, Black Panther, Progressive types not doubt)out there that actually think Glenn is a psychotic circus clown with an inferiority complex and who sees patterns in wall paper that point to an Obama Communist takeover with the help of Liberal aliens from some planet just this side of Pluto...but sadly they are out there.

        Ah shucks, Glenn is just regular folk, except with more money. Heck fire, Glenn is no different than the tea party crowd with the strap on weapons and signs comparing Obama and Hitler. And I would be remiss if I didn't mention the birthers.

        And I've had it with all the racist accusations and the suggestions that the 912er's have a collective IQ that is lower than a pencil eraser. Not true, its actually closer to soap dish than pencil eraser, so there.

        These are fine people and true patriots and simply want a white guy in the White House. Is that so wrong? I'm just asking questions here!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 05, 2009 7:42 am ET)
        16  
        Well, we have just seen plenty of examples of Beck's crazt stuff. Please show us your examples of Maddow's, Olbermann's, and Schultz's crazy stuff that is comparable. I am sure it should be no problem for you guys.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (September 05, 2009 7:56 am ET)
          9  
          I'm pretty sure that they can't do it.

          That's their knee jerk reaction, as if their shows are equal to Beck's somehow, when they're not even really close.

          Next thing you know, they'll be telling is about how Beck's ratings are SOOOO much better than MSNBC, so it MUST mean that he's correct.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by alienofwar (September 05, 2009 11:02 am ET)
            11  
            Of course, because according to Fox "News" viewers, the higher the ratings, the more truthful it is!

            They obviously suffer from a herd mentality.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 06, 2009 1:19 am ET)
              6 1
              Of course, because according to Fox "News" viewers, the higher the ratings, the more truthful it is!
              That's why they sound like they learned all their current affairs "knowledge" from SpongeBobSquarePants, which has much higher ratings than the Foxtards.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by my4cents (September 06, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
              3  
              OT.
              Obama was elected with a clear majority. He won Indiana (and NC), for gods sake.Were > 50% of Americans fascists, communists, nazis, whatever, a mere 7 months ago?
              And why did the true Americans like Hannity, Beck, Limpball, fail to warn the public about the monster that Obama really is? It is not like they did not try.
              My feeling is that it is an illustration of people who think they are entitled to something, finding it hard to let go.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kydem09 (September 07, 2009 11:39 am ET)
                   
                Face it, Obama's election was a referendum AGAINST Bush. It was not a mandate on his policies. People were so angry with Bush that they chose to ignore Obama's dangerous ties and agenda. Now they're starting to see who he really is, hence the drop in his poll numbers.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by ted92114 (September 07, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
                   
                White Americans have been guilted into allowing a wicked-leftwing agenda to flourish. Radicals with evil intent have infiltrated "good causes" and some very questionable ones too.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by thedailyphosdex (September 05, 2009 10:24 am ET)
        4 1
        Something which Mr. Beck may want to read up on vis-a-vis his contract would have to be the Morals Clause thereof.

        Which allows Fox Prolefeed to dismiss Mr. Beck if he engages in behavours bordering on Moral Turpitude (cf. the demise and fall of Lonesome Rhodes, in the person of Andy Griffith, in the 1957 movie A Face in the Crowd, if you remember that one).
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DeathPanelChairman (September 05, 2009 11:58 am ET)
           
        Ain't no crazies on our side ma'am. I don't recall any progressives bringing ammo to one of bush's speeches (granted, we wouldn't have been let in since bush screened every attendee to make sure the crowd loved him.) Beck is beyond insane-most likely because 2 family members commmitted suicide. Poor thing should get some help.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
        6  
        Why do you bring up Olbermann, Maddow and Schultz as a defense of Beck's feigned craziness? Why do you assume that people with brains enough to understand that Beck is a charlatan playing people like YOU watch those shows? See, what you don't seem to understand is that Beck and the rest of the Fox entertainment programs are just that . . . entertainment. They are presenting opinion and stories which are slanted to appeal to low information people like you. You buy their nonsense hook, line and sinker with NO independent research of legitimate sources. If Glenn Beck told you that he thought that the moon really was made out of green cheese and brought in an "expert" to back up his claims, you'd believe it because you heard it on Fox.

        Me, personally, I understand the difference between opinion programing that is found on Fox, MSNBC, and CNN. Apparently, you do not.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (September 05, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
        7 6
        "Too bad this site doesn't report the whole story..."


        Glenn Beck always reports the whole story. All sides--never ever just one. Lots of healthy, intellectual debate. Very factual. He's never, ever afraid to have an opposing view or to be challenged.

        As Beck was pouring simulated gasoline above, there was an Obama spokesperson right there with a differing viewpoint, challenging Beck on his views. Wasn't there?

        Too bad this site doesn't report the whole story like he always does.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 05, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
          12  
          Glenn Beck always reports the whole story.

          I can back you up on that, New Frontier. I subjected myself to a bit of Blechhh's puppet show last night.

          He did a fabulous revisionist history of the FCC, explaining that The Fairness Doctrine made journalists afraid to tackle controversial subjects.

          That all changed when Raygun's people came in, and removed that unfair pressure to report responsibly, or provide the opportunity for rebuttal.

          This opened the door for wingnut talk radio, now free of those old-fashioned constraints of truth and objectivity, to broadcast whatever their corporate owners wanted to tell the most ignorant Americans.

          Beck warned his savvy audience that the left was again trying to "silence voices" by pushing through back door versions of the FD, under the guise of local responsibility and diversity with regards to the public airwaves.

          But, as you note, Beck didn't only give his side of the story. He ended with a phone call from Rush Limbaugh, and did they get into some heated debate* !

          * heated debate = non-reality -based reacharounds.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dmathews (September 05, 2009 11:48 pm ET)
              2
            The Fairness Doctrine was abolished by the FCC in 1987 with the urging of Ronald Reagan. Prior to that date, government officials monitored the airwaves recording shows with their stop watches making sure that equality prevailed.

            Since then many political talk and other shows arose on the radio. In fact these shows brought radio back from the brink of dying. Rush has been credited with explosion of the talk show format. Whether that is the case or not is not the point. Everyone had a shot at this medium and many took it, left, right and center.

            Conservatives dominate this medium today, but many on the left have tried and failed. Among others were Mario Cuomo, Jim Hightower, Al Franken and Air America is hanging on by a tenuous thread. There are other left talk show hosts still on the air today, but have dismal ratings.

            So why have the conservatives made it and the left just can’t seem to get a foot hold? My opinion is simply it is market driven. It also explains the rise of Fox News Channel, launched in 1996. FNC jumped into a sea of center left channels, such as CNN, MSNBC and others and has dominated the cable and even some broadcast networks. I believe there are many more on the right side of the political spectrum than on the left side.

            The Obama administration desperately wants to shut down conservatives on the radio and I believe TV as well. They claim they do not want to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, but what they will do, if allowed, will be just as effective. It will mean political discussions will be stifled for all. Many radio and TV owners will just throw in the towel and get out of the business. They will have no choice and neither will we. The only thing that will remain standing will be PBS radio and TV and many boring channels that no one will want to watch.

            I think political discussions are a good thing, both left and right. I do not want to see them go away. They will if Obama gets his way. I plan to do everything in my power to try and prevent this from happening.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (September 05, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
          8  
          All sides--never ever just one.

          He never forgets to include the fearmongering paranoid side.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by roninkannushi1711 (September 05, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
          8 1
          New Frontier,

          Fear mongering is emotional, not factual. Facts can be independently verified. G.Beck will not allow opposing views. How can it not be the "whole story," when he is quoted verbatim, on this website? Faux wee hour televangelism is not about the truth. Will G.Beck subject his opinion(s) to independent peer review?

          G.Beck makes claims, statements, and accusations, yet does not support his rhetoric with evidence. Surely, the conservative media would pick-up on allegations, and feature month-long twenty-four hour coverage of his apocalyptic fantasies, on Fox News.

          It be it,
          Ronin Kannushi.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (September 05, 2009 7:57 pm ET)
            9  
            I agree. I was being sarcastic; I didn't think I needed to point that out.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (September 07, 2009 11:42 am ET)
               
            Well, if Beck can be chastised for not offering opposing view, let's chastise Olbermann for the same thing. Besides, as little as I watch Beck's program, I have seen opposition.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (September 05, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
      7  
      Beck doesn't believe any of this stuff. Beck is a comedian/entertainer who is looking to make a buck. He's appealing to the fringe who do believe this crap . . . the Alex Jones crew. He's found his niche and it's paying him well. He's just feeding the warped fantasies of the folks who believe this stuff and he's LAUGHING his backside off at them. They're just too uninformed and SCARED to understand that he's LAUGHING at them.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hrhc13 (September 07, 2009 12:28 am ET)
           
        O/T
        Speaking of Beck being a "comedian", I found this on Cracked the other day. Freaking Hilarious!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (September 05, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
         
      Next he will say that everyone should not listen to the Presidents State of the Union address this January, or be transformed into a mind-controled deed abiding slave of the OLIGARHY that is President Obama!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by afisher (September 05, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
         
      Beck is a very insecure man, who has shown that he is incapable of understanding that his world view is not mainstream. The world has changed and he is unwilling to move into that world. He is being enabled by Murdoch's Fox Broadcasting.

      He like many in the GOP are angry when their view was denied by the US electorate...and his continuing temper tantrums and misinformation is his juvenile attempt to regain his envisioned advantage.

      I suspect he will never admit his fears and will lead a very sad life...or all of this is just "paid for" commentary and he is laughing all the way to be bank on the backs of his many uninformed and scared viewers. Either way, let me be the one to call him what he really is: A LOSER!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (September 05, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
      10  
      To the wing nuts who dare to compare Beck to Olbermann or Maddow: if you watched either Olbermann or Maddow, you'd know that both hosts regularly go after who? DEMOCRATS, not the least of which is...OBAMA!

      But since you're so busy exchanging recipes for bark stew and dandelion wine in the right wing survivalist echo chamber of horrors, you wouldn't know that.

      Olbermann and Maddow aren't afraid to go after who is in POWER, be it a Republican or Democrat, while Beck is all right wing nuttery, all the time. Where were Beck's grand theories about Bush's concentration camps (Gitmo), Bush's fascist tendencies (rescinding Habeas Corpus, "legalizing" torture) and Bush's hijacking of our government (firing USAs for not prosecuting Democrats for frivolous charges, signing statements, unilateralist use of the Executive branch to usurp the other branches)?

      Nowhere.

      But in comes Obama, and out roll the conspiracy theories one after another after another, one crazier than the last, and all of them capable of being debunked by a kindergartner.

      Beck is a purveyor of hyperbole for the fanatics who cra**ed their pants the second a black man was handed the reigns of power in an overwhelming electoral and popular vote win. There is no other explanation. Clinton provoked but a fraction of the disdain and fear. All that leaves is Obama's skin color.

      White flight takes many forms, one of which is a flight from reality.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by roninkannushi1711 (September 05, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
      8 2
      Fellow Matterers,

      Vortex reasoning has met its fantasy. G.Beck can prove, not under oath, that unidirectional spin can go against itself, and make sense. FEMA, "concentration," camps were created by Pres. Obama, during Katrina under the Bush administration. His magic chalkboard can prove it. Ahem, yep, sure, right, NOT!

      Science fiction to explain a nightmare has gone infomercial: G.Beck still impresses me as a wee-hour televangelist selling toothpicks.

      I do not understand...Youth, and adults are joining hate groups already. Isn't that part of community service, according to the G.Beck book of folly?

      He keeps throwing the world Fascism. Is President Obama oppressing capitalism? What does an economic stimulus do? When has Pres. Obama exalted white power, or forcibly suppressed opposition? If he is an autocrat, why include both sides of the isle, in negotiations? A dictator would not allow G.Beck and ilk to speak, less exist.

      A broken moral compass will lead the confused to sanctimony.

      It be it,
      Ronin Kannushi.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Barbara Molloy (September 06, 2009 7:14 am ET)
        1  
        Remember that book "Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot?"

        Well, that's putting it mildly when speaking of Glenn Beck. Add "Paranoid Schizophrenic" to idiot and you get what's going on with Beck.
        A few of the things one should worry about according to Mr. Beck:

        1. The President of the United States is a communist and a racist.
        Why..what/where is the evidence of the aforementioned?: He, Beck "just has a feeling...thinks so."

        2. The Health Care Bill is really about "something else," something "sinister and alien." Why? He, Beck, "just has this feeling" it's so.

        3. There's a book you can get on Amazon.com where, if you read between the lines you'll understand that radical Communist Muslim hippies, dating back to the sixties, have been conspiring to bring down our Democracy. They are everywhere -- your neighbors who drive a Volvo -- your own mom and dad who peruse medicare!

        You need to get inside a shed or outbuilding of some kind and amass yourself of the guns "they," the radicals, are going to take from you--- as well as some canned goods to last a year or two-- until the bloodshed and mayhem of this "civil disaster in the making" has passed!

        4. The current President, Obama, is really an alien from, not only another country, but most probably, another planet or universe. He has come down from that universe in the pretense of a regular person, (albeit only half-white) to eliminate mankind as we know it. This all begins with an innocent ploy (please don't be fooled) to "stimulate the depressed economy."

        5...There's more, of course. Your car(s), home, and any property you have worked for all your life will be confiscated -- why? Just because! Then, when it's all gone and your children look upon you as you are dying, you will have no say but to be forced to agree to have a plug pulled on your last breath(s). Why? Just because..

        Yup. We're all goners now, and how!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by BrianBeach (September 06, 2009 10:56 am ET)
         
      WOW ... anybody ever consider he may be correct?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BrianBeach (September 06, 2009 10:59 am ET)
         
      wow
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RobertBeatty (September 06, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
         
      "But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution...and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendancy to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that." (Obama, WBEZ, Chicago Public Radio, Janaury 18, 2001)

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommycd99 (September 06, 2009 9:18 pm ET)
         
      Just a couple of things:
      First of all, he complains that there are all these symbols on the Rockefeller Plaza yet did he mention that the building that he goes to work in everyday is located in Rockefeller Plaza? No because that would mean that he accepts what he is ranting about. If it were not for Rockefeller Plaza he and his FIX NEWS would not have a home.
      Secondly, you must remember that this Beck guy is also the one who had a sexual relationship with his sister. He even had the guts to write about it in his book. He said he was in love with her. Now he does say it was a joke on the reader but he can't tell the truth in his everyday life so why should we believe that he is telling the truth when he says it is just a joke?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave_82 (September 07, 2009 12:37 am ET)
      4 1
      I still don't get how you can have a Socialist Fascist.

      Socialist is for treating all man as equals.
      Fascism is for only there kind as equals.

      Socialist is for no religion.
      Fascism is to use religion.

      etc etc.

      And neither system works.

      It's like having a Communist Capitalist, or a Fire Ice cream.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RightWingExtremist (September 07, 2009 2:54 am ET)
           
        Socialism is the sharing of wealth (profits or commodities) by gerneral citizenry after the government has collected it from the producers/industry.

        Fascism is a government system that takes over ownership of private enterprise.

        Communism is a government system that does both: Mandates government run industry (set up on Communes), and divies up the spoils (in theory) to it's citizens that belong to the state party.

        For example....
        Italy was fascist but not socialist.
        Germany was fascist AND socialist.
        USSR was fascist AND socialist AND communist.

        All require increasing the size of government to maintain.


        Now, personally, none of those sound too good to have in America.
        We've already set a dangerous trend with the "fascist" takeover of the banking and auto industries. That's dangerous.
        Now we're talking socialized medicine.
        Perhaps just as dangerous.

        I'm not naive enough to say that Republicans have the answer. They don't. Unregulated industry is just as bad as unregulated government control.

        BOTH ARE BAD!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (September 07, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
        2  
        Some restaurants have fried ice cream so that proves that Obama is a Godless Muslim limosine liberal Marxist!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by RightWingExtremist (September 07, 2009 2:44 am ET)
         
      You don't have to agree with someome to understand that you should ALWAYS question what the government tells you.

      You people can't possibly, in good conscience, tell me that you believe what politicians tell you? Do you?

      Glenn Beck, if nothing else, questions authority - their motives, their means, and their ends. Is that really such a bad thing?

      Is he a conservative nut-job?
      I don't know.
      But I will always be willing to look at issues from EVERY angle, not just the ones presented to me by the government.

      I don't trust the government. Most Americans don't.
      Until they are willing to abide by the Constitution which they SWORE to support and defend; I guess I never will.


      PEACE
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jakesomedevil41 (September 07, 2009 10:39 am ET)
         
      this entire article is taken out of context, and has zero credibility.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (September 07, 2009 10:46 am ET)
        2
      On the topic of rhetoric it's a sad state of affairs today.

      PolitiFact runs a website that analyzes statements by politicians and advocates for truthfulness. I'm not holding them up as the last word...we can all agree or disagree with their judgments...but they paint a pretty dismal picture.

      Of the following elected leaders...they show Pres.Obama as the most truthful...because he tells the truth half the time.

      Pres.Obama...truthful 51%
      VP Biden...truthful 38%
      Pelosi...truthful 25%
      Boehner...truthful 27%
      McConnell...truthful 40%

      Pitiful.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rskazimer1517 (September 07, 2009 11:05 am ET)
         
      Perhaps Glennie needs a large dose of his own medicine by jacking
      up the internet "rumor" of Beck's alleged heinous 1990 crime. Prove us wrong, Beck. Prove us wrong.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jakesomedevil41 (September 07, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
         
      this "research" is taken out of context.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 2010willsuck4U (September 07, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
        1
      LOL - You have NYT, WashPost, CBS, NBC, and Keith what's his name (and all 42 of his viewers), we have Fox News and Rush. Clearly not a fair fight, maybe Fox should only broadcast 4 hours a day?

      Van Jones was and is a racist far left pompous jerk, now he is just one w/out a White House role. Governing is so much harder than campaigning, no? At least you have giants like Pelosi and Reid in Congress to lead you...
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.