About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Beck relies heavily on Drudge protégé Andrew Breitbart in recent attacks on NEA, Jones, and ACORN

September 15, 2009 5:02 pm ET — 79 Comments

In recent weeks, Fox News' Glenn Beck has been credited with precipitating the resignation of White House "green jobs" adviser Van Jones, the reassignment of National Endowment for the Arts communications director Yosi Sergant, and the amplification of an anti-ACORN video produced by a conservative filmmaker. In all three instances, Beck has credited the "instrumental" work of conservative columnist and Web publisher Andrew Breitbart, who has a history of smearing progressives and making inflammatory statements.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Andrew Breitbart: Drudge protégé, frequent smearer of progressives

Web publisher, conservative columnist, Drudge protégé. From his official biography on BigHollywood.com:

Andrew Breitbart is publisher of the news portals Breitbart.com and Breitbart.tv. In January 2009, he launched Big Hollywood, a group blog off of Breitbart.com on Hollywood and politics from the center/right perspective. His latest group blog endeavor, Big Government, launched in September. His column, "Big Hollywood," appears weekly in the Washington Times and he co-wrote the best-selling attack on celebrity culture, Hollywood, Interrupted. Andrew was also the primary developer for The Huffington Post (don't hold that against him).

ZDNet.com's Greg Sandoval wrote in 2005 that Matt Drudge, Breitbart's "former boss and mentor ... has been shipping large numbers of readers to Breitbart.com." Sandoval also wrote:

Breitbart is a former researcher for Arianna Huffington, the former Republican congressman's ex-wife who is now a Democratic gubernatorial candidate in California. After Drudge hired him as a paid assistant, Breitbart made a name for himself as a skilled news gatherer and witty critic of left-leaning politicians and celebrities. Drudge too is considered sympathetic to the Republican party.

Breitbart surprised many fans of the Drudge Report when he agreed to help launch Huffington's Web site, which many considered to be the left's version of the Drudge Report. Nonetheless, working for the Huffington Post did not damage Breitbart's relationship with Drudge.

"I have a very good relationship with Matt," Breitbart said. "I still have daily contact with him. He is, I think, one of the Internet's top success stories."

Breitbart, who is married to the daughter of actor Orson Bean, grew up in Los Angeles. He cut his teeth in the online news business at cable channel E Entertainment Television. He worked for the company's online magazine before going to work for Huffington. He introduced himself to Drudge after reading the Drudge Report in 1995.

Breitbart has been quoted as referring to himself as "Matt Drudge's bitch."

"Used to be liberal." On the July 2 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck (retrieved from Nexis), Breitbart told guest host Eric Bolling that he "used to be liberal until I saw that the media was the Democratic Party. And I think that the way that the Obama administration and the mainstream media is behaving over the last year, to a year-and-a-half, where you realize there is no separation between the two, will expose a lot of moderates to how propaganda can turn into policy in the United States."

Breitbart has frequently made controversial remarks on his Twitter account:

  • Breitbart calls Kennedy a "villain," a "duplicitous bastard," and a "prick." Following the death of Sen. Ted Kennedy, Breitbart posted a series of Twitter messages in which he called Kennedy a "villain," a "duplicitous bastard," and a "prick" who "destroyed lives."
  • "When was last time MSM reported story where a Dem was corrupt/wrong that didn't have to do with Hillary & Bill offing an enemy?" Posted by Breitbart on September 4 on his Twitter.com account.
  • "If Obama isnt racist, why does he hang out w so many who are?" On September 3, Breitbart wrote on his Twitter account: "Van Jones! If Obama isnt racist, why does he hang out w so many who are? Or is his explanation Spike Lee's: Black people CAN'T be racist?"

Breitbart has frequently made incendiary remarks in his Washington Times column:

  • "My long-held fear is that Mr. Obama is hiding something about his education." In his August 3 column, Breitbart wrote: "My long-held fear is that Mr. Obama is hiding something about his education. ... While I have no desire to see Mr. Obama's birth certificate, I do want to see his college transcripts. My suspicion, one could even call it a conspiracy theory, is that Mr. Obama committed himself to a radical curriculum, aligned himself with the far-left professoriate, and sought to keep this biographical information from his political enemies, especially then-rival Hillary Rodham Clinton, for fear that they would paint the former community organizer and follower of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright as something other than an advocate of racial reconciliation."
  • Democrats depend "on the ability to keep blacks in fear." In his August 3 column, Breitbart claimed that the "Democratic Party -- which is now Mr. Obama's party -- now depends on the ability to keep blacks in fear: of cops, of Republicans, of conservatives, of 'Uncle Toms,' and even of Tiger Woods, who proves that America, while still imperfect, is clearly heading in the right direction."
  • "David Duke and James von Brunn currently share more in common with Markos Moulitsas and Arianna Huffington" than conservatives. From Breitbart's June 15 column:

The inconvenient truth is that David Duke and James von Brunn currently share more in common with Markos Moulitsas and Arianna Huffington than with Bill Kristol and Charles Krauthammer. But the right wouldn't be so crass or foolish to try to blame the political left for the existence of -- or motivation behind -- haters like Mr. von Brunn.

No one is suggesting Mr. von Brunn was doing hip rolls at the Huffington Post pilates tent during the Democratic National Convention, but his underlying philosophy, when examined and detailed, shares eerie similarities to the dominant "multicultural" mind-set at the liberal American college campus and on prominent left-wing blogs.

Change the word "supremacy" to "studies" and you'll understand the separatist mold dominant in humanities departments across the land. Women's Studies, Queer Studies, African-American Studies and Chicano Studies all produce culturally acceptable separatist and supremacy mind-sets and countenance movements that resemble those of white supremacists.

La Raza, Mecha and the Black Panthers all have prominent places at the academic table. Professors like Michael Eric Dyson and Cornel West make a handsome living baiting people unfortunate enough to be born with white skin. President Obama's "wise Latina" choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter exemplifies how the post-structuralist, racialist lunatics have taken over the asylum.

Breitbart made similar points in a profanity-laced voicemail to Gawker.com, which was posted on June 11.

  • "Democrats would distribute needles, methadone, medical marijuana and biscotti in voter goodie bags if they could get away with it." From Breitbart's June 8 column:

Democrats invest -- with taxpayer money, mind you -- in groups like ACORN that, among other sordid tactics, seek out Skid Row bodies and wheel them to polling places. All the Democratic National Committee needs are vans and smelling salts. Pop culture and the "education system" have done the rest, making "D" the default choice on Election Day.

Democrats brazenly take policy positions -- think government services and even amnesty for illegal immigrants -- not because they are the right thing to do, but because they are time-tested demographic bribes. Forget cigarettes and beer, Democrats would distribute needles, methadone, medical marijuana and biscotti in voter goodie bags if they could get away with it.

Democrats long ago jettisoned America's melting-pot ideal -- E Pluribus Unum ("Out of Many, One") -- because it imperils their campaign for permanent rule. Splitting the country into separate identity groups and playing them against each other works a lot better. And anyone who disagrees is a racist.

  • Advice for GOP: Democrats are the "enemy"; find a meaner Lee Atwater. In his June 8 column, Breitbart advised that "the GOP will not survive if it doesn't accept the fact that the Democrats are its enemy and that it must begin to play for keeps. That means finding another Lee Atwater -- only meaner -- and not apologizing when we get him."
  • Obama "clearly subscribes to the notion" of judging people "by the color of our skin." In a June 1 column, Breitbart wrote that with "Obama, many Americans had hoped to get a post-racial president. With Mr. Obama's pick of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to replace David H. Souter on the Supreme Court, it looks less and less like they got one. President Obama -- a man we still hardly know -- clearly subscribes to the notion that we should judge each other not just on the content of our character, but also by the color of our skin. We've had warning signs before. Remember the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.?"
  • Sotomayor: "racist comment ... reverse racism." In his June 1 column, Breitbart described then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor as making "a racist comment in a 2001 speech" and wrote that her actions reflected "reverse racism."
  • Admits flipping off protesters at event calling attention to African children being forced into slavery as child soldiers. In a May 18 column titled, "I, Jerk," Breitbart admitted flipping off protesters who he thought were anti-war protesters but who were really protesting the problem of children being abducted and forced to fight for the LRA in Northern Uganda and more recently in the Congo. Breitbart concluded: "In order to prevent my eternal damnation, and to end what has been three weeks of difficult REM sleep, please visit: www.invisiblechildren.com."
  • "[R]efuses to accept" the Matthew Shepard "mythology" that his death was a hate crime. In a May 4 column titled, "Political Correctness is Torture," Bretibart wrote that Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) "had the facts to make a strong case" that Matthew Shepard's murder was drug-related rather than a hate crime. He wrote that Foxx "joins me and gay journalist Andrew Sullivan as public figures who refuse to accept the Shepard mythology."
  • The "netroots," such as Media Matters, reacted to Limbaugh's CPAC speech "as if they had witnessed a hate crime." In his March 2 column, Breitbart wrote that Limbaugh "hit the ball out of the park" with his Conservative Political Action Conference speech, and that the "netroots, the mainstream media's devious protector from its left flank (e.g., the Huffington Post, Media Matters and the Daily Kos) also opined as if they had witnessed a hate crime."
  • Compares Obama to Hugo Chavez. In his August 26, 2008, column, Breitbart wrote that it's "scary to think that this could be a preview of an Obama presidency in which attacking the rich is all the rage, and the rich in the news media pretend it's OK. Hugo Chavez is having a helluva run bringing down his formerly prosperous nation of Venezuela with that formula."

Breitbart has also:

  • Claimed Oprah has "been behind the scenes orchestrating this presidency as a media presidency."
  • Invoked "how bad it is" in Canada during a discussion of health care "rationing" and called health care reform "socialism."
  • Claimed that "card check" would "play to the narrative that this is an Illinois-style thugocracy."
  • Said it was "devastating" to President Obama that he "pitched like an Indonesian teenage girl" while throwing the opening pitch at the All-Star Game.
  • Claimed that the White House literally "directed" town hall violence.
  • Accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of having "blatantly lied" in saying that some health care reform protesters were "carrying swastikas" -- in fact, some had done so.

Beck thanks "great journalist" Breitbart for ACORN video

September 9: Beck says "things change" tomorrow due to video on ACORN. During his Fox News program, Beck previewed an "exclusive" that would air on his program the next day, which he claimed would make "things change a lot for those in power." Beck later aired snippets of a video of conservative activist and filmmaker James O'Keefe and TownHall.com columnist Hannah Giles going into ACORN's Baltimore office and, in O'Keefe's words, "posing the most ridiculous criminal scenario we could think of and seeing if they would comply -- which they did without hesitation." Beck suggested the video was the "exclusive stuff" that he predicted the media would be "talking about" instead of health care.

September 10, morning: Breitbart's BigGovernment.com posts ACORN video. At 6:10 a.m. ET, O'Keefe posted the video on BigGovernment.com. Portions of the video were replayed and discussed numerous times on Fox News, among other media outlets. Following O'Keefe's post, Breitbart wrote on BigGovernment.com about how O'Keefe contacted him in August to pitch his "independent film investigative journalism project." From his post:

When James O'Keefe came to my door in August, I was shocked by how young he looked. Kinda like Matthew Modine circa "Vision Quest."

"Come on in," I said, and I took him to my basement command center. He opened his laptop computer and showed me the very-hard-to-believe independent film investigative journalism project he had described to me over the phone

How can I describe the video I watched? Is it a put on? I almost can't believe what I am seeing. But with regards to ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, I am quite cynical. So I do believe it.

September 10, evening: Beck airs video, credits Breitbart and BigGovernment.com. On his Fox News program at 5 p.m. ET, Beck interviewed Giles and credited Breitbart for starting the story. From Glenn Beck:

BECK: I talked to you on the radio program earlier today. I encouraged you not to expose yourself anymore. I think that you are a very courageous person. I think -- I think your partner in crime here, or exposing crime, is also courageous.

I think Andrew Breitbart -- this comes from Big Government -- you can find all of this on BigGovernment.com. I saw this on Saturday, and I was amazed at your courage.

[...]

BECK: The whole thing is on BigGovernment.com -- been there since 9 o'clock this morning, been out there. You can see the unedited tape. You can see the entire transcript. I can't get the media. I mean, Andrew Breitbart -- he can't do it. Fox is the only one covering this -- the only one.  

Discussing ACORN video, Beck cites Breitbart as one of the "great journalists of our time." During the September 10 broadcast of Beck's radio program, Beck discussed the ACORN video with Breitbart, whom he called one of the "great journalists of our time":

BREITBART: This is very Van Jones-esque, in that if it ever comes to the point where ACORN is brought up on ABC, CBS, NBC, or at New York Times, and other like --

BECK: Shocking.

BREITBART: -- like city dailies, it will be to a great degree the first time they've ever heard ACORN, unless it's simply in AP stories put on A-2,073, saying that there's an investigation into a group, without any context. Where are the great journalists of our time? That's what I think --

BECK: Can I -- may I answer that question? You know where the great journalists of our time are? Andrew Breitbart. I was just thinking when I was listening to this, I mean this Andrew. You are the only one -- you were the only one, besides watchdogs, that were really aggressively working behind the scenes with us on Van Jones.

We started going with Van Jones, and you started digging and digging and digging, and you were putting him up, you were going -- you want to know where the great journalists are? Andrew Breitbart. You will be remembered, sir. You will be remembered.

Fox News frequently mentioned Breitbart's website in reporting on video. For instance, on September 10, the website was mentioned on programs such as Glenn Beck, The O'Reilly Factor (according to a Nexis search), Hannity, Happening Now, America's Newsroom, and Special Report:

 

Mediaite.com's Robert Quigley wrote on September 10 that Breitbart knows "how to promote: he went on Fox News this morning [on America's Newsroom] to discuss his 'exclusive' (and happened to mention his website a decent handful of times during the interview), and he got his video placed as the top story on Foxnews.com, ahead of arguably bigger stories like Joe Wilson's outburst during Obama's healthcare speech last night."

Beck says Breitbart "instrumental in digging and finding the things on Van Jones" and "changing the course of the conversation"

Beck widely credited with Jones' resignation. Numerous media outlets have credited Beck with Jones' resignation, which followed months of attacks by Beck. As The New York Times noted, "Beck began criticizing Mr. Jones in July, first in segments on his syndicated talk radio show and then, on July 23, on his Fox News program." Following an advertiser boycott led by "Color of Change, an activist group co-founded by Mr. Jones four years ago ... Beck devoted more time to Mr. Jones's past remarks."

Beck says "new audio" of Van Jones "was found by Breitbart and sent to me last night." On the September 3 broadcast of his radio show, Beck credited Breitbart for sending him "new audio" of Jones about "minimum and maximum goals." On his Fox News program, Beck also cited Breitbart in directing him to the remarks. From the September 3 edition of Glenn Beck:

BECK: My concern is what is this guy's vision for America as a special adviser to the president -- I mean, especially since personnel is policy? Why doesn't he -- are you ready for this? Last night, I got a phone call. It was from Breitbart TV. They said, "Glenn, go to your email box. You have to see what we have found."

This explains everything. This verifies everything that we have talked about. Why doesn't Mr. Van Jones apologize for this?

JONES [audio clip]: One of the things that has happened, I think, too often to progressives is that we don't understand the relationship between minimum goals and maximum goals.

[...]

BECK: From that clip we get a pretty strong understanding of Jones' feelings about capitalism, don't we? So much for, "He's a big, giant capitalist pig now, I hate him." Really?

Beck says Breitbart "instrumental in digging and finding the things on Van Jones ... truly are changing the course of the conversation." On September 9, Beck thanked Breitbart.tv co-creator Scott Baker for "really truly ... changing the course of the conversation" on Jones. From The Glenn Beck Program:

BECK: You know what, Scott, let me ask you a question, because you have been instrumental in digging and finding the things on Van Jones. First of all, thank you for doing that. Thank you for being actually intellectually curious and honest when no one in the mainstream media -- you know what? I talked to Andrew Breitbart about a week ago, and I thanked him, and I said, "Do you realize that you guys really truly are changing the course of the conversation?"

You guys -- there's a few that are actually doing the job of the fourth branch of government -- as if that actually existed -- and you're changing the course. And I thank you at Breitbart for doing it.

BAKER: Well, thank you. But it's also what you said all along, which is when you're saying, I'm -- you know, when you say, I, Glenn Beck, might not be here, you the audience need to find your voice, you need to check things out. Well, we see that -- that cascades down. Because we're getting an enormous number of tips, and, you know, I'm sure it's a fraction of what you're getting. But sometimes they're in common, because I see stuff that people are copying to you and sending to us.

BECK: Yep.

BAKER: And some of the stuff that we put -- we just put up a piece about -- it's about a 15-minute special report that we posted this morning, that looked at sort of the implications of the Van Jones story.

Beck says "great journalist" Breitbart was "really aggressively working behind the scenes with us on Van Jones." From the September 10 broadcast of The Glenn Beck Program:

BREITBART: This is very Van Jones-esque, in that if it ever comes to the point where ACORN is brought up on ABC, CBS, NBC, or at New York Times, and other like --

BECK: Shocking.

BREITBART: -- like city dailies, it will be to a great degree the first time they've ever heard ACORN, unless it's simply in AP stories put on A-2,073, saying that there's an investigation into a group, without any context. Where are the great journalists of our time? That's what I think --

BECK: Can I -- may I answer that question? You know where the great journalists of our time are? Andrew Breitbart. I was just thinking when I was listening to this, I mean this Andrew. You are the only one -- you were the only one, besides watchdogs, that were really aggressively working behind the scenes with us on Van Jones.

We started going with Van Jones, and you started digging and digging and digging, and you were putting him up, you were going -- you want to know where the great journalists are? Andrew Breitbart. You will be remembered, sir. You will be remembered.  

Beck credits Breitbart for breaking NEA-Sergant story

August 25: Breitbart's Big Hollywood publishes artist alleging NEA pushed art community to advance administration's agenda. Artist Patrick Courrielche alleged in a BigHollywood.com post that in an August 10 conference call "hosted by the NEA, the White House Office of Public Engagement, and United We Serve," artists "were encouraged to bring the same sense of enthusiasm to" issues such as health care, energy, and the environment "as we had brought to Obama's presidential campaign, and we were encouraged to create art and art initiatives that brought awareness to these issues." From his post:

Backed by the full weight of President Barack Obama's call to service and the institutional weight of the NEA, the conference call was billed as an opportunity for those in the art community to inspire service in four key categories, and at the top of the list were "health care" and "energy and environment." The service was to be attached to the President's United We Serve campaign, a nationwide federal initiative to make service a way of life for all Americans.

It sounded, how should I phrase it ... unusual, that the NEA would invite the art community to a meeting to discuss issues currently under vehement national debate. I decided to call in, and what I heard concerned me.

[...]

We were encouraged to bring the same sense of enthusiasm to these "focus areas" as we had brought to Obama's presidential campaign, and we were encouraged to create art and art initiatives that brought awareness to these issues. Throughout the conversation, we were reminded of our ability as artists and art professionals to "shape the lives" of those around us. The now famous Obama "Hope" poster, created by artist Shepard Fairey and promoted by many of those on the phone call, and will.i.am's "Yes We Can" song and music video were presented as shining examples of our group's clear role in the election.

Obama has a strong arts agenda, we were told, and has been very supportive of both using and supporting the arts in creative ways to talk about the issues facing the country. We were "selected for a reason," they told us. We had played a key role in the election and now Obama was putting out the call of service to help create change. We knew "how to make a stink," and were encouraged to do so.

Throughout the conversation my inner dialogue was firing away questions so fast that the NRA would've been envious. Is this truly the role of the NEA? Is building a message distribution network, for matters other than increasing access to the arts and arts education, the role of the National Endowment for the Arts? Is providing the art community issues to address, especially those that are currently being vehemently debated nationally, a legitimate role for the NEA?

August 26-31. Conservative media report allegations. In the days following Courrielche's post, several conservative media outlets picked up Courrielche's allegations. On August 26, the Drudge Report posted a link to Courrielche's Big Hollywood post under the headline, "WANTED: NEA SEEKS ARTISTS TO PUSH OBAMA AGENDA ... ." The Washington Times' Inside Politics column excerpted Courrielche's post, and Times online producer and editorial writer Kerry Picket wrote about Courrielche's allegations for the Water Cooler blog. FoxNews.com's Joshua Rhett Miller reported on Courrielche's allegations and interviewed him. Drudge linked to the FoxNews.com article that day.

September 1. Beck interviews Courrielche. Beck promoted and interviewed Courrielche for the first time on September 1. Beck introduced him as "a contributor on Breitbart's Big Hollywood blog" and "the guy who was brave enough to not only tape [the conference call] and then bring it here." While discussing Courrielche's allegations, Beck said that the "people involved in a conference call, including the White House, knew that this was on the fence, if not outright illegal. They knew for sure that this would outrage you if it would ever get out."

September 2. Beck again promotes allegations, attacks NEA spokesman Yosi Sergant. The day after he interviewed Courrielche, Beck again promoted the allegations and said that Sergant "is creating a propaganda machine for the president of the United States and that is wrong."

September 10: Sergant reassigned. ABC News' Yunji de Nies reported on September 10 that "[l]ast week, FOX News' Glenn Beck spent a solid amount of airtime blasting Yosi Sergant -- then-National Endowment for the Arts' spokesman -- accusing him and his agency for using government tax dollars to create propaganda for the Obama Administration. Today, the NEA says Sergant has been reassigned." The Huffington Post's Ryan Grim wrote that "the move represents a significant step down and was the result of the controversy." Grim added:

Beck attacked Sergant and the NEA on his Fox News talk show, accusing the agency of propaganda efforts similar to those used by Nazi Germany. And now Sergant has been tossed overboard, making him Beck's second victim in his campaign to rid the administration of perceived radicals, socialists, communists, fascists, anarchists and all other manner of nefarious influences.

Perhaps not coincidentally, both Sergant and Van Jones -- Beck's first takedown -- have roots in on-the-ground organizing and were tightly connected with the grassroots progressive community.

September 11: Beck credits Breitbart for breaking NEA story. On the September 11 edition of his radio show, Beck said Breitbart -- not him -- "broke" the NEA story. From The Glenn Beck Program:

BECK: I saw in The Washington Post today, there's a new story. It says Beck strikes again; Yosi Sergant reassigned at the NEA. This is a story that I didn't -- I didn't break. Stu, who was it that broke -- this was Breitbart. This is again another Breitbart story, where the NEA communications director reached out and said, hey, listen, we have to be very careful with our language here -- almost sounded like ACORN -- we have to be very careful with our language here, but we would like you to start making some art, you know, to support the president and his administration.

Now, yesterday, the White House reassigned him because the communications director just needs to be a little more seasoned. So, in other words, not so loose-lipped. It's incredible.

On the September 11 edition of his Fox News show, Beck said that only he and Breitbart are calling for "investigations into the National Endowment for the Arts." From Glenn Beck:

BECK: Number of investigations into the National Endowment for the Arts? Remember I told you this story? And they were using the National Endowment for the Arts to buy propaganda for the president. Yeah. I mean, the only one that I know that's been calling for it is me and Andrew Breitbart.

Transcripts

From the September 3 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: My concern is what is this guy's vision for America as a special adviser to the president -- I mean, especially since personnel is policy? Why doesn't he -- are you ready for this? Last night, I got a phone call. It was from Breitbart TV. They said, "Glenn, go to your email box. You have to see what we have found."

This explains everything. This verifies everything that we have talked about. Why doesn't Mr. Van Jones apologize for this?

JONES [audio clip]: One of the things that has happened, I think, too often to progressives is that we don't understand the relationship between minimum goals and maximum goals.

[...]

BECK: From that clip we get a pretty strong understanding of Jones' feelings about capitalism, don't we? So much for, "He's a big, giant capitalist pig now, I hate him." Really?

From the September 9 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

BECK: You know what, Scott, let me ask you a question, because you have been instrumental in digging and finding the things on Van Jones. First of all, thank you for doing that. Thank you for being actually intellectually curious and honest when no one in the mainstream media -- you know what? I talked to Andrew Breitbart about a week ago, and I thanked him, and I said, "Do you realize that you guys really truly are changing the course of the conversation?"

You guys -- there's a few that are actually doing the job of the fourth branch of government -- as if that actually existed -- and you're changing the course. And I thank you at Breitbart for doing it.

BAKER: Well, thank you. But it's also what you said all along, which is when you're saying, I'm -- you know, when you say, I, Glenn Beck, might not be here, you the audience need to find your voice, you need to check things out. Well, we see that -- that cascades down. Because we're getting an enormous number of tips, and, you know, I'm sure it's a fraction of what you're getting. But sometimes they're in common, because I see stuff that people are copying to you and sending to us.

BECK: Yep.

BAKER: And some of the stuff that we put -- we just put up a piece about -- it's about a 15-minute special report that we posted this morning, that looked at sort of the implications of the Van Jones story.

From the September 10 edition of Glenn Beck:

BECK: I talked to you on the radio program earlier today. I encouraged you not to expose yourself anymore. I think that you are a very courageous person. I think -- I think your partner in crime here, or exposing crime, is also courageous.

I think Andrew Breitbart -- this comes from Big Government -- you can find all of this on BigGovernment.com. I saw this on Saturday, and I was amazed at your courage.

[...]

BECK: The whole thing is on BigGovernment.com -- been there since 9 o'clock this morning, been out there. You can see the unedited tape. You can see the entire transcript. I can't get the media. I mean, Andrew Breitbart -- he can't do it. Fox is the only one covering this -- the only one.

From the September 10 broadcast of The Glenn Beck Program:

BREITBART: This is very Van Jones-esque, in that if it ever comes to the point where ACORN is brought up on ABC, CBS, NBC, or at New York Times, and other like --

BECK: Shocking.

BREITBART: -- like city dailies, it will be to a great degree the first time they've ever heard ACORN, unless it's simply in AP stories put on A-2,073, saying that there's an investigation into a group, without any context. Where are the great journalists of our time? That's what I think --

BECK: Can I -- may I answer that question? You know where the great journalists of our time are? Andrew Breitbart. I was just thinking when I was listening to this, I mean this Andrew. You are the only one -- you were the only one, besides watchdogs, that were really aggressively working behind the scenes with us on Van Jones.

We started going with Van Jones, and you started digging and digging and digging, and you were putting him up, you were going -- you want to know where the great journalists are? Andrew Breitbart. You will be remembered, sir. You will be remembered.

From the September 11 broadcast of The Glenn Beck Program:

BECK: I saw in The Washington Post today, there's a new story. It says Beck strikes again; Yosi Sergant reassigned at the NEA. This is a story that I didn't -- I didn't break. Stu, who was it that broke -- this was Breitbart. This is again another Breitbart story, where the NEA communications director reached out and said, hey, listen, we have to be very careful with our language here -- almost sounded like ACORN -- we have to be very careful with our language here, but we would like you to start making some art, you know, to support the president and his administration.

Now, yesterday, the White House reassigned him because the communications director just needs to be a little more seasoned. So, in other words, not so loose-lipped. It's incredible.

From the September 11 edition of Glenn Beck:

BECK: Number of investigations into the National Endowment for the Arts? Remember I told you this story? And they were using the National Endowment for the Arts to buy propaganda for the president. Yeah. I mean, the only one that I know that's been calling for it is me and Andrew Breitbart.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by kydem09 (September 15, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
      2 12
      And MMFA, Huffington Post, DailyKos, etc. have a history of smearing conservatives. So what? I don't care where he got the info, it was correct.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (September 15, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
        6 1
        You mean have a history of exposing conservatives, and the information Glenn Beck gives out is not correct! There i fixed it for you!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (September 16, 2009 8:42 am ET)
          1 2
          Nope, I say what I mean. No need for you to filter through your leftist lens. And the information he's presented over the past 3 weeks has in fact proven to be true. By using Van Jones' own words and deeds, he effected his resignation. By exposing ACORN for the corrupt organization they are, the Senate voted overwhelmingly to block any additional funding to them. Hopefully, a Congressional investigation is to follow. The ever increasingly irrelevant mainstream media has egg on its face for missing both these stories.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 16, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
            1  
            And don't forget about the egg on the face of Rockefeller Center. Beck also exposed Rockefeller Center as a hotbed of hidden artwork which shows that this country (or maybe just Rockefeller, it was never really clear) has actually ALWAYS been a hidden bastion of communism, liberalism, progessivism, fascism, tsarism governmental control. Wait.....What the hell was that expose all about again?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 16, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
            1  
            Or his exposing the unversally accepted practice of statistics as being completely partisan and without merit. I thought it was fascinating the way Glenn Beck used the study from the Unversity of Idontknowhere to prove that the initial estimates of the 9/12 march (a respectable 70,000) were actually 24 TIMES that amount and actually 1.7 MILLION. Just imagine how wrong our numbers have been on everything. The Obama inauguration must have had something like 40 million people there. Or the 25 Million Man March. The entire DC metro area only has about 5 million people, so these gatherings have been HUGE. Of course, maybe that 5 million population number is incorrect as well, I will have to consult the "body count" study from the University of Idontknowwhere. We need more free thinkers like Glenn Beck out there disproving the time honored pracice of allowing numbers to be universal and bipartisan. Thank you, Glenn! Excellent work. I look forward to his next expose on physics!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (September 15, 2009 5:41 pm ET)
        6 1
        Except, of course, if his information comes from Breitbart, Drudge and the Wasthington Times, then it is more likely than not WRONG!

        BTW, how is repeating the right-wing noise machine and simply pointing out where they are WRONG "smearing conservatives"?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (September 15, 2009 10:36 pm ET)
        3  
        This must be the same kind of "smear" that got Rep Joe Wilson upset a few years ago.

        Deceased Senator Strom Thurmond's illegitimate, half black daughter, born when Strom was 22 and the maid in his parent's house was 16, came forward after he died to let people know that he had a relationship with her while he was alive.

        Rep Wilson said that the daughter was "smearing" Thurmond by letting people know that he had gotten the family's black maid pregnant when she was 16 - that it was a smear. Hmmm, how is it a smear? A smear is an unfair accusation. Thurmond was 22 yrs old and he got a 16 year old employee in his family's house pregnant at a time and place when the races didn't mix.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (September 15, 2009 5:20 pm ET)
         
      I love watching Glenn Beck's show on Fox News Channel. I try to watch it every day. But I'm starting to wonder about him of late. I recently e-mailed him with some Reasonable Questions for Unreasonable Times -- and yet his staff refused to provide answers.

      And so my biggest question remains, "Why does Glenn Beck hate America?" Even with the childish taunts and insults I received in response from his interns, I will continue praying for Glenn Beck, as I think the future of our Great Country rests in his hands to a certain degree, i.e., how much more fear, hatred and violence can one man foment, etc.

      I ask again: Why does Glenn Beck hate America? It's a question Mr. Beck needs to answer pretty darned soon or people are gonna get the idea that he's a coward who can't answer a simple question.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by toombsie (September 15, 2009 5:31 pm ET)
      3 1
      Man I wanted to throw up today reading a article in the WSJ today about how the New York Times is taking its cues from Fox News and if "one wants to stay ahead on news topics, it would be better to watch Fox News than read the New York Times." They cite the fact that Fox News broke the Van Jones and ACORN stories before the Times did.

      Yes two incredibly important stories that Fox News had the big scoop on! That's what everyone needs to focus on - Van Jones (who was a nobody in the administration) and ACORN (the oft demonized charity that even if the allegations are true we are talking about some millions of a dollars in fraud - not a big deal when we have Bernie Madoffs in this world bilking people of 50 billion). I'm not saying ACORN should be ignored - it's just not front page news.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 5:41 pm ET)
        5 2
        It's front page news for Fox and Beck for one reason and one reason only: Barack Obama is President.

        Let's forget the fact the under the Bush administration, money was given to ACORN. ACORN is now evil because Obama is President.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (September 16, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
            1
          The money going to ACORN has increased since the Dems took control of Congress. Also, ACORN isn't evil because Obama is President, ACORN is evil because it's corrupt.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (September 15, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
      7 1
      Give me enough time and I bet I could find a right wing lawyer and an accountant to setup up a corporate prostitution ring, with drug dealing on the side. Then setup offshore banking to hide the money. Then to top it off, sell securitized investments in my new corporation through a wall street bank, with a AAA rating to boot.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 9:46 pm ET)
          5
        Cool, but what does that have to do with the American people paying for ACORN?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 10:14 pm ET)
          6  
          Americans aren't paying for employees of ACORN telling pimps and prostitutes how to get around paying taxes. That's why they are fired. What they recorded has NOTHING to do with what ACORN gets from the government.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (September 16, 2009 5:17 am ET)
            2  
            Isn't Acorn getting 4 billion dollars? Oh wait a minute, 4 billion is how many people showed up the other day in Washington.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (September 16, 2009 8:44 am ET)
              1
            There are 4 videos out there right now that contradict you. And if the Senate didn't think it had anything to do with federal funding, why did they vote to stop the funding?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pros2pros2940 (September 16, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
              2  
              How quickly the United States government fires ACORN

              How slowly the United States Doesn't Fire Blackwater

              But then Blackwater only murdered people.

              ACORN gave legal advice.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by fishergirlusmc (September 16, 2009 12:26 am ET)
        1 5
        Most liars, I mean lawyers would do it, not just right wingers, let's face it most lawyers have no morals whatsoever.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fabucat58 (September 15, 2009 6:10 pm ET)
         
      Media Matters, this is nothing less than masterful research! Thank you for your exposure of this McCarthyist. I've seen the so-called ACORN videos. Given the history of Breitbart and James O'Toole, the ACORN 'sting' "filmmaker," I wonder whether or not how close to the truth these videos are. It would be interesting if you could ascertain as to whether or not these videos have been altered or doctored in any way. Also, it would be interesting to question the ACORN employees who were captured on these videos.

      When Van Jones & Yosi Sargent had their jobs threatened, I realized that the right wing was going to chip away at every Obama appointee one by one, until they got Obama impeached.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Nightshade Q (September 15, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
         
      You would think that the organization that has as one of its contributors (Bloggers on the bus author) would know what FOX is trying to do: Build the netboots (I saw one of their advertisements use that term).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sayan Neviot (September 15, 2009 6:40 pm ET)
      1 3
      Wow. Thanks for posting all of this!
      I've been aware of Andrew Breitbart for quite some time, in fact he is a Facebook friend and I'm a follower of his profile at Twitter. But it was not until you thoughtfully compiled this dossier that I developed such a healthy respect for his credentials, and his hugely successful record of scooping the rest of the media.

      Again, thanks.
      I was interested in Breitbart's work before, but now I'm a big fan!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
        1 3
        Hahaha...I was thinking the same thing. I read all of those things and I was like "Wow, so that's why I like him."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MagCynic (September 16, 2009 12:52 am ET)
        1 2
        Good. I'm glad I'm not the only one who actually liked this post. Brietbart's done a lot of good work. Thanks for reminding me MMFA!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by birdjay (September 15, 2009 7:12 pm ET)
      2 1
      I don't get the point of this post.

      But, I appreciate you putting the whole thing together here, now I don't need to do it myself.

      Finally, media matters does an actual public service.

      You crack me up.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NoNannyNeeded (September 15, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
      3 4
      Maybe he is getting info from these news sites because the others (mainstream media" refused to report it!

      It's obvious freedom of the press went out the door when it comes top this administration. It has not problem reporting false stories about the former president and even threw in a few negative personal comments from the reporters themselves. They also print pictures of dying soldiers even after the family requests them not to. that seems to be appropriate in media today but to actually show something that could actually reflect negatively on the administration? NEVER!!
      I have even seem them go as far as to support Kanye in his drunken tirade then other night stating it was planned.

      It sickens me how the media chose to ingore such stories.

      The bottom line is ACORN is dirty. There have been too many examples of corruption not to notice. These people went into these ACORN Centers & exposed them for wht they are. If for some reason these videos wer "fabricated" & ACORN has done no wring why these employees fired. PLEASE PLEASE stop & examine this. It goes beyond ideology here.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (September 15, 2009 7:51 pm ET)
        4 3
        What did ACORN, as an organization, do illegal?
        Can you prove it is not a case of few bad apples?
        The way these tapes were produced makes me suspect we are not seeing the whole truth.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (September 15, 2009 9:42 pm ET)
          3  
          I've watched every minute of video that's been posted in this "sting" and I'm suspicious. I urge everyone interested to do the same and pay close attention to what the the ACORN employees say. Very often the replies are very disjointed from the questions you hear asked off-camera. There are a lot of cutouts. They've been heavily edited.

          About the child prostitution rings:
          Pay especially close attention to what the ACORN workers say when that topic is supposedly being discussed. You never hear a word from the workers directly addressing the issues of these child prostitutes. It's very easy to picture their words applying to much more innocuous questions than those we hear being posed by the off-camera voice. That's true in every single case.

          Yes, there was a lot of advice on how the adult prostitute could handle her income and a lot of it was contrary to current tax law. There are many people who believe that if an adult chooses to be a prostitute that it's really no one else's business and these ACORN workers probably fell into that group. As a result, they saw no reason she shouldn't be able to buy a house.

          I was puzzled at the parts in the videos where the ACORN workers are giving advice about protecting herself from a potentially violent ex-pimp. The advice about keeping herself safe and keeping her money say from him seemed pretty reasonable and the videos portrayed it as though there were something devious in the advice.

          I will admit that the worker in the San Bernardino video does seem to be a real nutcase.

          I bet that no one ever gets to see the original, unedited video.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 10:06 pm ET)
          1 2
          visit BigGovernment.com...it's pretty self explanatory. It doesn't take a genius...here's a clue- Underage prostitution is illegal and disgusting, when someone brings that up you don't help them, you call the police. There, hopefully that clears it up. A few bad apples? Maybe we should go over the definition of a few and maybe some math too regarding statistics and coincidences.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 10:16 pm ET)
            4  
            Then you prosecute the former employees of ACORN. So, again, what does that have to do with ACORN and what their organization does?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 10:37 pm ET)
              1 4
              Correct and you stop giving them billions of dollars from the American people for not being able to control their organization. THAT IS what their organization is doing...by the way...and it seems like their doing it again and again, promulgating underage prostitution in case you missed it. There will be more videos if you need more proof but good God take your blinders off Jen. Defending the indefensible just makes your argument...um indefensible.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
                3 1
                No. If ACORN is using government money to break the law, then I would agree. But, there is no evidence of that.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 16, 2009 5:31 pm ET)
            1  
            yeah, BIG GOVT a right wing propaganda site like DRUDGE OR FOX NEWS.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (September 15, 2009 10:39 pm ET)
          5  
          ACORN has already asserted that the tapes are unfairly edited. Plus, taping someone is illegal, plus most of the actions of the taped ACORN employees is simply embarrassing, not criminal or terrible.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NoNannyNeeded (September 15, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
            1 1
            You choose which is the lesser evil; taping someone undercover withour their knowledge or helping someone get a low income mortgage to set up a brothel for teenage girls brought here illegally to be sex slaves? You decide.

            Funny how everyone is up in arms over this being taped without their knowledge since NBC/MSNBC has done how many shows luring men in for sex. Isn't is called "Caught on Tape"? I also saw where on ABC there is "What Would You Do?". The one episode I say had actors pretending to be store workers harrassing day workers (actors too) to see what their other customers would do. Later the host, John Quinonez pretended to be a day worker as well luring a customer in to see how they would react to harrassing him only later to confront them with a camera in their face & ask them why they did what they did. Ladies & Gentlemen- that's today's journalism.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by fabucat58 (September 15, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
        2  
        To state that freedom of the press is gone now that Obama is President is preposterous. Listen to the radio--you can still hear Limbaugh and thousands of his imitators. Turn on the television, Fox still is broadcasting. Lou Dobbs still is on CNN and Scarborough and Radigan are still on MSNBC. Go to the news stand and you still can pick up The Washington Times and WSJ.

        The fact is, you will think that the entire media is in the tank for Obama until every journalist and cable personality is critical of him.

        I don't know whether or not ACORN is guilty and I will not know until there is a finding of fact in a court of law. Unlike you, I won't draw up any definite conclusions.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (September 15, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
      5  
      And the fact remains, yet to be refuted:

      ACORN has been operating for decades all over the country. In all that time and in all of those places not one single fraudulent vote has ever been shown to be a result of their activities.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (September 15, 2009 9:38 pm ET)
        1 3
        Correct, but apparently ACORN employees (probably benefitless temps) committed larcency (obtaining money under false pretenses). Ah, just a few bad apples, don't condemn the whole barrel. (Why haven't we heard that with regards to some other stories here?)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (September 15, 2009 9:53 pm ET)
          2  
          You mean like Abu Ghraib?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
              2
            It's funny when you're trying to make a point but you actually make oscar the grouch's point for him.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by my4cents (September 16, 2009 9:49 am ET)
              3  
              I would be making his point if the entire US Army was indicted for Abu Ghraib.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Evil Conservative (September 16, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
                   
                I didn't plan on you understanding.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by my4cents (September 16, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
                     
                  Is it because you get paid per post, regardless of its content?
                  Going forward, you will be ignored by me on this article.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by fabucat58 (September 15, 2009 9:54 pm ET)
          1  
          Why are you guys so obsessed with ACORN? What about Wall Street abuses? What about military contractors? Now, I understand that ACORN isn't the only progressive group that the right wing is going to be attacking. ACORN is just #1 on their hit list now.

          If the ACORN story is true, then why air this on Fox and Glenn Beck's show in particular? That in and of itself strips the story of any validity it might have. Glenn Beck has made blatantly racist statements (and I tend to look the other way in these matters). Beck also had a skit on his show during which he pretended to poison Speaker Pelosi. How can I trust any 'news' this man presents? If Glenn Beck told me the sky was blue, I'd have to look out the window to make sure.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
          2  
          What does ACORN gain from telling their employees (people they pay) to make up voter registration forms??
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 10:39 pm ET)
              2
            Hmmm...money?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (September 15, 2009 10:41 pm ET)
              5  
              Hmmm, actually no. They didn't get paid more for turning in more registrations.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
              3  
              How so? ACORN has fired and turned in employees to the authorities.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 11:20 pm ET)
                1 3
                Ok I'm just going to stop right here...I will let clear minded people make up their own minds if this organization should continue getting their money. They can do the research on how 40% of ACORN's money comes from our pockets and how that is funding corruption...people can go to biggovernment.com and see it for themselves. If you are comfortable with your money going to them, ok...but clearly most people will be brighter than you. You are just as disgusting for defending them. I need to go take shower...I am just appalled at people defending this.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Jen7 (September 16, 2009 12:03 am ET)
                  4 1
                  You can't prove the money the government gives ACORN is funding corruption. A shady video produced by shady characters isn't proof that ACORN is using government funds for illegal activities.

                  Spare me your righteous indignation. The fact that you are citing Andrew Breitbart is laughable. Where was his biggovernment.com website when Bush was expanding government and spending our way into debt?
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by fishergirlusmc (September 16, 2009 12:23 am ET)
            2
          Oscar,
          At Rotten ACORN, they claim that ACORN went to court in California so they would NOT have to pay their employees minimum wage.Thank God they will be getting no more of our hard earned tax money.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Evil Conservative (September 15, 2009 9:59 pm ET)
        1 3
        God it's hilarious watching "liberals" defend ACORN. At least we know how you really stand on child labor and abuse.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jen7 (September 15, 2009 11:01 pm ET)
          4  
          Can anyone show me where ACORN broke the law? Arrest warrants? Court documents?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NoNannyNeeded (September 16, 2009 8:51 am ET)
              1
            I would love to but unfortunately the current gov't is so far up the A$$ it will never happen. Heck, we can't even get the mainstream media to report on it let alone actually do something about this corrupt oganization.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ScienceBuff (September 16, 2009 10:47 am ET)
              1  
              Prosecutions require court-acceptable evidence of illegal activities. That's been extremely lacking for those who wish to go after ACORN.

              The mainstream media generally wants to base their reporting on reliable information. Highly edited videos from an extreme partisan falls short of that standard.

              To label an organization as corrupt, one would usually have to indicate specific activities that qualify as corrupt. So far those also seem to be lacking.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by fabucat58 (September 16, 2009 9:58 am ET)
          1  
          Well, conservatives lost their moral authority regarding 'abuse' when they started defending torture.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (September 16, 2009 10:07 am ET)
             
          God it's hilarious watching "liberals" defend ACORN. At least we know how you really stand on child labor and abuse. - Evil Conservative

          Watch the videos with an open mind. The ACORN workers never specifically address the topic of child prostitution. We only hear that topic introduced by a voice off-camera. Don't you think that in separate discussions on video in three locations (eliminating San Bernardino where the discussion wasn't serious) involving seven different ACORN workers you'd have heard at least one of them say something clearly related to that topic? Nothing they say is. Not one thing.

          I'm prepared to be shown wrong. Maybe some video will be released in which an ACORN worker actually says something about child prostitutes, but I'm not holding my breath.

          No one is ever going to be allowed to examine the original, unedited tapes.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NoNannyNeeded (September 16, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
               
            Watch the videos with an open mind. The ACORN workers never specifically address the topic of child prostitution
            Yes the woman "Tanja" in Baltimore discussed the child prostitution for vairious angles. First she tells her to complete a 1099 form if she wants to claim employes on her taxes. She later says since they will be illegal don't so any paper work on them. when she finds out they are underage she says she can likely claim some (3-4) on her taxes as dependent but "don't claim all 13 because that will raise a flag". Later she specifically informs "Eden" to train the girls not to say anything about how they are earning money because it could get "Eden" in trouble.

            Please feel free to look up these videos on YouTube. I also watched the one from San Bernadino last night with that whack job "Theresa" and their was a timer clock showing the time. it doesn't seem edited.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Anthony (September 16, 2009 12:11 am ET)
      2  

      I swear to god, Andrew Breitbart writes exactly like one of the right-wing ring leaders on the former Yahoo 360, who threatened the lives of others opposing their views. They created a few of those hateful graphics we are seeing today years ago. Their attacks were often very well coordinated and a secretive yahoo group was also associate to them.
      In any ways the former 'triangle' relation Breitband, Huffington Post and Matt Drudge is very interesting.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by brandy115 (September 16, 2009 2:27 am ET)
        1
      WTF? If you are unaware of all of the outrageous ACORN activities then you should start putting the internet to good use. Voter fraud, community itimidation, retardation, etc. I don't think that they broke a law in the videos (although completely immoral by my personal standards), but I would rather pay for Medicare and Social Security than fund ACORN store fronts.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fabucat58 (September 16, 2009 10:00 am ET)
        2  
        I'll bet you that more of your tax dollars are going to Xe, the former Blackwater, whose employees murdered innocent Iraqis, and to Armour, whose employees in Afghanistan had homoerotic 'hazing' parties, than to ACORN. Let's put things into perspective, shall we?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by benjr (September 16, 2009 8:36 pm ET)
           
        I love how even though it's been defined numerous times here, posters keep writing "voter fraud". NOBODY at ACORN committed voter fraud. There was fraudulent voter REGISTRATION that was reported by ACORN, but not one of those fake voters actually voted. There is really a big distinction between the two, and before posting you really should know the difference.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (September 16, 2009 6:26 am ET)
         
      "Drudge protégé".

      Yeesh. What a depressing calling card.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (September 16, 2009 7:04 am ET)
      1  
      How can a fair and balanced, as well as accurate report, only come from a handful of sources?

      I could write an essay using only Wikipedia, but would my professor's accept it? No.

      I watch Fox News, as well as other news programs, and I research the web, trying to get information that covers the entire spectrum before I come to the conclusion, even researching different regional politics.

      For Beck to continue in his practice of using a couple sources, and then having those stories bounce around the Fox channel is just poor journalism, and horribly biased commentating.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (September 16, 2009 7:05 am ET)
         
      Every time I hear of the Drudge Report, I think of the word "dredge", as if Drudge is dredging the bottom of the journalistic barrel for biased news.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MaineiacMan (September 16, 2009 8:30 am ET)
           
        ACORN supporters....listen to what you are saying. It is always "shoot the messenger". Cant you see the message? I dont care who shot the video. Beleave your own eyes.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (September 16, 2009 9:55 am ET)
             
          I am neither an ACORN supporter or hater.
          What I know is that some ACORN haters took a video (and who knows how they did it, edited it) and are stating that the entire organization is corrupt.
          I would rather wait for complete evidence before believing anything.
          If I were to believe my eyes, I would have to believe 2 million were at the 912 party based on a fake photo.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by fabucat58 (September 16, 2009 10:05 am ET)
             
          "Beleave" your own eyes. It's hilarious who conservatives on here and on other websites cannot spell, even though this site has a spell check function. What's wrong, can't you even trust the spelling function on a liberal website?

          Seriously, of course I think that the ACORN matter needs to be fully investigated. It should, however, be an investigation by people who are trained in journalism, and are willing to be grilled on networks that are not as friendly to this matter as Fox is.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ScienceBuff (September 16, 2009 11:21 am ET)
               
            You're right that investigation is called for. However, that investigation should include both the actions of ACORN workers, how those actions relate to the organization as a whole and an examination of the evidence that is being used to try and convict ACORN in the court of public opinion. That would include an examination of the original, unedited video.

            I don't think that those who put out the video are interested in such an investigation. They're happy with leaving it in the uninformed court of public opinion.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 16, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
              1  
              Right. It looks alot like the Daily Show frankly. It's a funny story, not a serious, national story. I get the obvious feeling watching this that these "actors" are purposefully seeing how ridiculous they can act without someone calling them out. Not doing any real investigative journalism. If this were true investigative journalism wouldn't these actual, unedited tapes already have been handed over to the press and the authorities.

              I would LOVE to hear all the ACORN fearmongers here explain to me why, if this investigation is so serious, that these tapes have not been handed over for scrutiny. I think it is actually fairly obvious when you watch the tapes and hear all the worst "questions" come from off camera and especially when you see the strange, sudden, long cuts that occur throughout. Looks very much like a poor man's Daily Show investigation.

              Also, NO ONE actually thinks that guy was a pimp. NO ONE in any big city would take that guy seriously. NO ONE! I am actually amazed that he, or even Fox News, actually takes him seriously. He appears to be joking most of the time in these tapes. Also, even after watching these tapes, I am still not sure what crime ACORN is supposed to be charged with even if these tapes were true and accurate and unedited.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Midnight Kevin (September 17, 2009 10:50 am ET)
                   
                Glenn beck kept saying on his show that no other news agency was reporting this story... that is because it was exclusive to Fox and the website that owned the videos started the same day as Glenn Beck's initial coverage of this story.

                Glenn Beck and the rest of Fox only show small portions of the video, and it does not looks as if they were really doing anything. It looks as if they were standing around talking. How long were they there? How many ACORN places did they go to before that one worked? The investigator's story just seems sparse since the cable channel took over with the coverage.

                I particularly did not like the girl's language she was using on these talk shows, where she used the same vocabulary as Beck, referring to ACORN as a bunch of thugs, and admitting she had no knowledge of the group. To me, it did not appear that she had an objective investigation. She and her friend fished for their response, and when they got it, they aired the results.

                ACORN should conduct an investigation, and they should invest in training and restructuring of their organization to better achieve their goals, but to think these couple people represent the entire organization is ridiculous! As I have said before, not every priest is a child molester and people still go to church. I hope that these two kids pretending to be reporters get the book thrown at them for violations of the law, so that maybe they will learn to act within the law to get their story. What they did would never hold up in court. It was entrapment.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by phuckhweu (September 16, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
               
            Why do they call this MediaMatters? The only thing that Matters to Eric and company is "Who will we smear next?"
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Midnight Kevin (September 16, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
             
          I had never said I was an ACORN supporter. I recognize some of the good work that they have done in the past, and I believe organizations like ACORN should exist. The Republicans have similar organizations that have been involved in similar situations of fraud that ACORN is being accused of.

          It is good to look at both sides of the story.

          I am also reminded by my experience of going to join the Young Republicans club to help voter registration efforts for President Bush in 2000. The group had sought to avoid registration of Latinos because they would not vote Republican, and I was advised to avoid wasting forms on them... I'm sure that is not representative of the organization as a whole, but if I filmed them, I am certain all news stations excluding Fox would play it.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 16, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
        2  
        When i hear the DRUDGE REPORT I think immedietly it should be called the SLUDGE REPORT.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (September 17, 2009 8:26 am ET)
         
      Great source Glenn


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (September 18, 2009 12:16 am ET)
         
      Can anyone on this site tell me under what enumerated power in the Constitution allows ACORN to receive federal tax money?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe3884 (September 18, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
         
      The fourth branch? The smear and propaganda wing?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Simon_Lazarus (September 18, 2009 1:10 pm ET)
         
      I read this tripe about Breitbart and Beck and Fox News and keep asking, "So what?" Is this all dimwitted liberals have to say in response to the uncovering of their massive fraud and friendship with POS Truther scuzzbags like Van Jones? Van Jones was not smeared - he was EXPOSED by his own trail of lies and radicalism. ACORN was not smeared - it was exposed by its own history of shady practices and massive vote fraud and who knows what else. Heck, if Van Jones was "smeared," how come he got fired in less than a week? And if ACORN is being smeared, how come those who appear in the videos have been fired, and even Dems like Little Chuckie Schumer and Barbara Boxer in the Senate voted to strip them of federal funds? Or that the Dems in the House turned against Nancy Pelosi and voted the same way? Do you honestly believe that if these were "smears" that Dems wouldn't go to the wall to defend Van Jones and ACORN?

      Then again, what about the next target - the Carol Browners, the Cass Sunsteins, and the rest of the creepy scuzzbag lowlife radical crowd that Obama has surrounded himself with? Beck will expose them all, only because the Bankrupt Media in this country, like The New York Times, and The Comedy Network Doing Business as MSDNC, are too busy doing stories about Sarah Palin's son in law, or why Joe Wilson hollered "You lie!"

      No, the Left is losing this battle, because facts matter, and in these cases the Left is bereft of facts. They are bereft of everything else as usual, but this time even their friends are starting to abandon them as well. All of which makes for some lovely comedic routines on the news as they are caught with their pants down and have to report these stories a day late and a dollar short.
      Report Abuse