About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity demands Obama "turn this water on now" in Central California -- but pumps have been on for months

September 23, 2009 4:14 pm ET — 30 Comments

Broadcasting live from California's Central Valley, Sean Hannity continued his oft-repeated attack on "radical" environmentalists and the Obama administration for supporting water pumping restrictions that protect threatened delta smelt, by claiming the restrictions are "drying up this once fertile area" and calling on President Obama to "turn this water on now." But according to the Department of the Interior, the pumping restrictions ended on June 30 and have been returning to capacity since; moreover, water resource issues in the valley persist for many reasons, including years of drought in California, despite conservatives' attempts to blame problems solely on the restrictions.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Hannity demands Washington "turn this water on now"

From the September 17 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: And welcome to this special edition of Hannity. We are live in the Central Valley in California. This is some of the most fertile farmland in the entire country and helps sustain the entire country in terms of food, and what has become ground zero in a battle between environmentalists and whether or not the farmers in the Central Valley here have water.

Ladies and gentlemen, this has become a dust bowl. And we came here tonight with a message for Washington and President Barack Obama: Please, for the sake of the farmers where unemployment is now near 40 percent, please turn this water on now.

[begin video clip]

CROWD: Obama, Obama, Obama.

OBAMA: Hope is in the future. [...] We are hungry for change. [...] We will transform this country. [...] We are ready to believe again.

HANNITY: All of those promises, all of that hope. And, yet, in the San Joaquin Valley of California, hope doesn't spring eternal. This land was once considered the breadbasket of America. Roughly 12 percent of our nation's agricultural output came from this valley between Bakersfield and Sacramento. But everything has now changed.

Today, their water is gone, shut off by the government. And the same people whose cheers of hope and change echoed from this valley all the way to Washington have been abandoned in favor of a fish barely large enough to fit into the palm of your hand.

The scene here today is more reminiscent of the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Farms that once fed the nation are barren; the parched and cracked earth. It's right out of The Grapes of Wrath. Thousands have lost their jobs. They line up each and every day at unemployment offices for the chance merely to put food on their table.

With all the money being spent on a failed stimulus, health care reform, and bailing out Wall Street banks, the solution here is relatively simple: turn the water back on.

Tonight, we tell you the story of how a government has failed its own people, how radical environmentalists threaten the American dream, and how a liberal agenda that promised so much has left so many great Americans behind.

Welcome to "The Valley that Hope Forgot."

[end video clip]

HANNITY: And ladies and gentlemen, you are looking live at the thousands of people who have shown up here in the Central Valley of California. They want their farms back, they want their jobs back, and they want the water turned back on.

Now, tonight, you are going to hear from some of the politicians who are fighting on behalf of the citizens in this region. We will also talk to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. And we will even hear from an environmentalist who is actually defending the government's decision that are responsible for drying up this once fertile area.

Interior Department: "The pumps are on"

Pumping restrictions to protect delta smelt ended June 30. From a September 17 Department of the Interior document:

RHETORIC: "TURN ON THE PUMPS"

Q. Some people are blaming the Obama Administration's efforts to conserve salmon populations and the delta smelt, a threatened fish, for water shortages in the Central Valley. They are asking the federal government to turn on water pumps that deliver water through the Bay Delta to Central Valley users, but which -- to protect the Bay Delta and fish populations -- were recently subject to temporary pumping restrictions. Why won't the Obama Administration turn the pumps on?

A. The pumps are on. The temporary pumping restrictions that were required under the Endangered Species Act ended on June 30th. They accounted for approximately one-quarter of 2009 water delivery shortages to farms and water users; the other three-quarters of this year's delivery shortage were the result of a lack of run-off.

Biological opinion set end date of June 30 or earlier for pumping restrictions. The biological opinion released December 15, 2008, by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service required pumping restrictions during a period in which larval delta smelt are likely to be present and vulnerable to the pumping. The opinion states that the pumping restrictions end either on June 30 or earlier if the daily average water temperature reached a certain level.

Interior Department charts show significant increase in water flow since June. According to charts from the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Central Valley Project's federal pump at the C.W. "Bill" Jones Pumping Plant near Tracy, California -- referred to as "Tracy" -- and state pumps at the Harvey O. Banks Pumping Plant -- referred to as "Banks" -- have significantly increased water flow from June, when the restrictions were lifted, to July and August. Moreover, a September 8 memorandum from the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority indicated that the "Jones" pump "held to capacity levels throughout August."

Drought, not fish protections, responsible for most of decline in water exports from bay delta

Department of Water Resources: 75 percent of 2009 shortfall due to drought. A Department of Water Resources document on 2009 water conditions shows that a loss of 500,000 acre feet of water are due to fish protections while 1.6 million acre feet were lost as a result of drought.

2009 is third consecutive year of drought in California. In an August 31 drought update, the Department of Water Resources stated, "Water Year 2009 is the third consecutive dry year for the state. Water Year 2007-08 resulted in 63 percent of average annual precipitation across the state, and Water Year 2008-09 resulted in 72 percent of average annual precipitation. By the end of July, 2009, statewide precipitation stood at 78 percent of average for this water year."

Fresno Bee columnist slams Hannity for "made-to-fit lies and omissions as facts"

Bill McEwen: Hannity "exaggerated, distorted and turned a complex situation into a hysterical rant." In a September 19 Fresno Bee column, Bill McEwen wrote that "Sean Hannity came to the San Joaquin Valley a few days ago and did what he does best. He exaggerated, distorted and turned a complex situation into a hysterical rant." McEwen argued that the area's water resource issues are a result of decades of actions from the federal government, and that Hannity ignored the fact that "the pumps have been on since June 30 -- too late for spring plantings, admittedly, but on nonetheless despite claims otherwise by three local congressmen and comedian Paul Rodriguez." From the column:

Sean Hannity came to the San Joaquin Valley a few days ago and did what he does best. He exaggerated, distorted and turned a complex situation into a hysterical rant.

But I'll give the Fox News right-wing shouter this: citing all the wrong reasons, he unintentionally fingered the right culprit for the economic disaster unfolding on the Valley's west side and in Northern California.

To hear Hannity and his cast of local enablers tell it, farmers and farmworkers in the Westlands Water District are suffering the pain of a water shortage caused by activist federal judges, the delta smelt and President Barack Obama's administration.

Not much of that -- or anything else he said -- is true. But, in fact, the federal government does bear much of the responsibility for the mess entangling the west side, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the decline of salmon along California's coast.

Decades ago, federal authorities promised more water to farmers than they could deliver. They compounded the mistake by offering subsidies and incentives that encouraged small farmers to become mega-farmers.

Then they turned around and -- again with incentives -- encouraged small fishermen to build bigger boats and bigger fleets, further endangering salmon.

The whole time, few in the federal bureaucracy had either the wisdom or the courage to ask how much water would be needed to sustain California's fish and wildlife, much less the state's population growth.

Hannity, of course, didn't say this. He's incapable of anything but shouting, mugging to his fans and palming off his made-to-fit lies and omissions as facts.

The activist federal judge ruling on many issues affecting the delta, farmers and fishermen is Oliver W. Wanger, a conservative Republican appointed by President George H.W. Bush.

Hannity called the Central Valley "a Dust Bowl." It's not. Millions of acres are being farmed, and most farmers are getting their water deliveries. In a one-hour show alleged to be about water, there wasn't a single second devoted to an explanation of the hierarchy of water rights under California law. Or a single word about the fact that Westlands' farmers have junior water rights, meaning that by law they get what is left after all the other interests have dipped into the state's sprawling water system.

Nor did Hannity bother to explain that Westlands' water comes from the Trinity River 400 miles away and that some Valley farmers sell their water rights to cities and developers.

And somehow Hannity, a fierce opponent of illegal immigration, didn't get around to noting that some of his newfound friends in agriculture rely on illegal immigrants to harvest their crops.

Hannity came here for two things: to tell the nation that a "2-inch minnow" is killing farming in the food basket of America, and to tell Obama to turn on delta pumps that send water to Westlands.

Never mind that the pumps have been on since June 30 -- too late for spring plantings, admittedly, but on nonetheless despite claims otherwise by three local congressmen and comedian Paul Rodriguez.

In a fake attempt at balance, Hannity conned Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, to be on the show. Hannity began the short segment by calling Grader "a wacko environmentalist from San Francisco" and any chance to have a thoughtful discussion about the destruction of the salmon fishing industry was lost.

All this said, the Obama administration's response to the economic hurt on the west side has been disappointing. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack made it clear during a recent interview at The Bee that the president isn't interested in entering California's water wars.

If heavy rains don't come this winter, a good argument can be made for keeping the pumps on next spring so that Westlands' soil can be planted and watered -- particularly since there is evidence suggesting that pollution and non-native species also are contributing to the decline of fish in the delta.

But the long-term answers aren't that simple. Simple, unfortunately, is the only thing that Hannity understands.

Hannity has pushed "turn the water back on" meme for months, both before and after pump restrictions ended

Hannity, May 8: Farmers are "losing their livelihood." Hannity did a segment about the restrictions on May 18, claiming that farmers are "losing their land, crops, and their livelihood, all because of a 2-inch fish." Hannity said that "[b]ecause of this little fish, up to 80,000 people are going to lose jobs," and "all they've got to do is turn the water back on." Fox News correspondent Ainsley Earhardt claimed that "[Farmers'] grandfathers were out there, blood, sweat and tears, making sure those crops are going to grow so you and I would have fruits, vegetables. And let me tell you, they are shutting it down because they think the minnow could get caught or does get caught in the pumps." Earhardt added: "It's fish versus families." [Hannity, 5/8/09]

Hannity, June 19: "How about the endangered human list here?" Hannity hosted comedian Paul Rodriguez, who called the pumping restrictions "un-American," noting that "[f]ish do not vote." Ignoring the natural drought, Hannity stated, "This is a little minnow fish, and literally farmers are -- they are -- their farms are becoming worthless, their crops are dying, their trees are dying. You can't bring these back. How about the endangered human list here? They're willing to wipe out the economy in this important vital growing area of our country." During the segment, Rodriguez told Hannity to "[f]ocus this powerful microphone on our dilemma," to which Hannity responded, "I'm not going to let it go. I promise you ... I will do everything I can do." [Hannity, 6/19/09]

Hannity, August 11: "Turn the water on and let the people in central California eat." Hannity again hosted Rodriguez, who stated that "by next spring, you're going to get your vegetables from China." Hannity said, "[W]here is Barack Obama, where is Nancy Pelosi, where is Harry Reid? Turn the water on and let the people in central California eat. I can't believe I'm even debating this, to be honest, Paul." Hannity later added, "I think this is really important. And I hope the president is watching or somebody will bring this to his attention, and somebody has got to turn the water back on. We've got to save these farmers. We've got to save these farms. We've got to do it for the people out there." [Hannity, 8/11/09]

Other conservative media make similar distortions

The Wall Street Journal, September 2: "Californians can thank the usual environmental suspects" for farmers' problems. In a September 2 editorial, The Wall Street Journal asserted: "California has a new endangered species on its hands in the San Joaquin Valley -- farmers. Thanks to environmental regulations designed to protect the likes of the three-inch long delta smelt, one of America's premier agricultural regions is suffering in a drought made worse by federal regulations." The Journal asserted that "[f]or this, Californians can thank the usual environmental suspects, er, lawyers," and that the "result has already been devastating for the state's farm economy."

The Examiner, September 17: "Devastation to jobs and economic ruin mean nothing to radical environmentalists." In a September 17 Examiner.com post, William Busse wrote that "[a]s usual, devastation to jobs and economic ruin mean nothing to radical environmentalists. To them, the Delta smelt's survival has a higher priority than the human condition. ... But really, by now should we even be surprised?"

Malkin: "Man-made drought ... wreaking havoc on farmers in the name of saving the Delta smelt." On her blog, conservative commentator Michelle Malkin embedded video of Hannity's September 17 show, saying he "traveled to the San Joaquin Valley to report on the man-made drought that's wreaking havoc on farmers in the name of saving the Delta smelt." Malkin also included video of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) speaking before the Senate rejected an amendment from Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) that would prohibit funds from being made available for actions mandated by the biological opinion; Malkin called it a "bizarre statement in opposition to DeMint's attempt to save farmers from eco-hysteria."

The Washington Times' Carpenter: Senate rejected amendment to "turn water pumps back on in the struggling farming area." On her Washington Times blog, Amanda Carpenter wrote that "Fox News personality Sean Hannity took his highly-rated prime time television program there earlier this month to interview the farmers who were asking the government to get the water back. This brought national attention to a problem that had only been covered by a few outlets, like the Wall Street Journal. Mr. Hannity called his program 'The Valley that Hope Forgot' and slammed the Democrats in power for protecting fish at the expense of suffering farmers." Carpenter noted DeMint's amendment, characterizing it as one that would "turn water pumps back on in the struggling farming area of California's Central Valley that were shut down earlier this year to save a three-inch fish."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Jen7 (September 23, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
      7  
      I'm shocked! Hannity, exaggerate? Distort? Nah...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (September 23, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
        8  
        I'm impressed. Hannity is only three months late on this, while most everything Republican is 50 years behind the times.

        I drove up and down the length of the valley in late May, and there were signs posted for hundreds of miles reading "Congress Created Dust Bowl", all identical, but I'm not sure who was behind them.

        Hannity shows once again that the way to get wingnuts outraged is to find a small animal with a funny name, and focus on it. Why do words like "smelt" and "snail darter" and "spotted owl" get such hysterical reactions from right wingers?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (September 24, 2009 12:37 am ET)
        1  
        Yes, I am taking a poll to see just how many people on this site think that Hannity has any intention of truth telling when he is reporting on Obama. Either he is a bold faced liar or the rottenest reporter who ever talked on TV and one who constantly gets his facts wrong when talking about President Obma or any Democrat for that matter. As a Republican, I find him totally embarrassing. You can take your pick!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 23, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
      3  
      "DROUGHT." That's a liberal code-word for GLOBAL WARMING, you see, so we can't go acknowledging the DROUGHT either!

      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      I need a DRAUGHT!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (September 23, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
        5  
        Hannity: "Well, well,..um...if that's the case, then turn the water off!, why flood out the state!"
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 23, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
        3 1
        HANNITY needs a drought in his mouth.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by GaryD (September 23, 2009 7:09 pm ET)
          2
        if we get a drought that's Global warming. A flood? That's Global Warming. Tornadoes? Global Warming. no Tornadoes? Global Warming. Too Hot? Global Warming. too Cold? global Warming. hurricanes? Global Warming. no Hurricanes? Global Warming. Smh.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 24, 2009 7:54 am ET)
            1
          Yep. DIfferent parts of the world get different weather. Oh, my frickin' gourd! I'll give you a clue: If you live next to a LAKE, global warming will likely make your lifew a bit drier. If you live downhill from a GLACIER, it's likely to make your life a bit wetter! See? It's not THAT complicated!

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
          Darn scientists! With their darned liberal evidence!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by newzhound (September 24, 2009 9:34 am ET)
             
          Flat Earthier: This is news to right wingnutz, but there is a difference between climate and weather. Idiots call into the gasbags' shows and say "We could use some global warming here - it's 10 degrees outside. Ha ha ha."

          That's certainly an intelligent conversation, isn't it?

          We're talking about man-made climate change here. For example: hurricanes. There has been a reduction in the number but an increase in the severity of those that do occur. The data are quite clear on this - particularly if one doesn't selectively quote figures by combining categories to intentionally make it appear otherwise.

          Let's take a step back, however. Let's say the odds of man-induced climate change are 1 in 20 - or even 1 in 100. Or 1 in 1,000.

          All we're discussing is life on earth. So the downside risk is the destruction of mankind.

          On the other hand, taking basic steps such as using alternative sources of energy (and reducing our dependence on oil imported from countries that don't like us very much) and all the other logical steps will improve our lives.

          I call that a win-win.

          But then, I also believe in science.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 24, 2009 10:02 am ET)
               
            But then, I also believe in science.

            Well, no, technically you don't BELIEVE in science. You require, after all, that the PROOVE their case; you just accept the conclusion that's supportted by the evidence. BELIEF dosn't enter into it, quite the opposite really, since you requre PROOF. BELIEF is part of the conservative's mental illness.

            On a related note, I sent an email the otehr day to Dr. Robert Carrol, author of the Skeptic's Dictionary, expressing my appreciation of his work, and that I'd recently put in my Website Hall of Fame. I started my letter by saying that, "The Skeptic's Dictionary is my Bible." (All irony in that being intentional.)

            He was nice enough to write me bank, saying (among other nice things) "We should sell tee-shirts saying, 'The Skeptic's Dictionary is my Bible!'"

            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            I want a nickel for each one you sell, Carroll! LOL
            Report Abuse
    • Author by riverdog (September 23, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
      5  
      some of the restrictions by the EPA and others have made some bad decsions in the past but this seems to be another partison hack job by hannity. i try listen to his tv and radio show but it is just to much to take.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LarryE (September 23, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
      9  
      Has it appeared to anyone else as it has appeared to me of late that the right wingers are getting in the habit of "demanding" things that are already in the works - so they can claim credit for them?

      It would not surprise me in the least if in a relatively short time Hannity does a self-puffing piece saying that "we brought attention to this issue" and "in response," the "water is back on."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (September 23, 2009 6:11 pm ET)
        3  
        Like Reagan demanding that gorbachev tear down the Berlin wall.
        True, it was high drama and well said; but communism was collapsing rapidly of its own weight.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (September 23, 2009 7:14 pm ET)
        2  
        Were the spigots turned OFF by Obama, or by Bush? The decision was made in December of 2008. That'd be Bush.

        And it took 5 months for Obama's Administration to get them turned back on after reviewing the issue? That's 3 months faster than Bush's White House got to begin looking into the threat of Islamic terrorism on US soil.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by 24enak (September 23, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
      1  
      Fox News: We distort You abide
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (September 23, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
      4  
      I think Glenn Beck has heard Hannity, and he will keep the tear ducts turned on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Vincenzo (September 23, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
      3  
      Has it been determined how much he is contributing to global warming when he opens his mouth? The next ice age may begin if he stops talking suddenly.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (September 23, 2009 6:39 pm ET)
      2  
      Speaking of water...

      Also not mentioned by Hannity was the fact (a 4-letter word in FOXWORLD) that drought in S.E. Asia has, for two years now, resulted in huge increases in the acreage of rice in California.

      Further, rice is not only one of the thirstiest of all crops (can you say "evaporation"), the growers receive government price supports and water subsidies and nearly all of the rice is exported.




      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (September 23, 2009 6:45 pm ET)
      2  
      Does Sheer "Am I An Idiot?" InSannity now think he's Ronald "Tear Down This Wall!" Reagan?

      Wow!

      Quelle surprise that he should attempt to reduce an extraordinarily complex issue to such simplistic terms.

      Here are two background articles I found helpful:

      http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_13377530?IADID

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/31/MN7713RHJI.DTL

      Anyone serious about this issue needs to read up on the Kern Water Bank. InSannity never met a billionaire he didn't love - other than George Soros, of course.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (September 23, 2009 6:48 pm ET)
      3  
      Hannity could do a review of how the water from the Sacramento River is disbursed and how it came to be this way today. An ugly story for the the private use of a public resource.

      Naaah.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GaryD (September 23, 2009 7:07 pm ET)
        2
      To hell with the stupid fish. Other than that, I don't know what to make of this issue. i have seen quite a few stories on it, and the whole thing smells of rotten fish.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by btrue10280 (September 23, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
         
      Why should the government redistribute this water to the San Joaquin Valley. Let them go out and get their own water. I want my America back!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Midnight Kevin (September 24, 2009 9:58 am ET)
        2  
        What these farmers are asking for is water communism! Hannity does not want the distribution of wealth but he sure can go for the redistribution of water, and he wants Obama to give it to him!

        Down with water communists!

        --------------------------
        http://www.themidnightreview.com
        http://www.mumistheword.org
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Waring (September 23, 2009 11:03 pm ET)
      1  
      The real question is how much of the water for that area is being sold by the farmers after they buy it with discounts instead of being used for farming.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jgibson349687 (September 24, 2009 3:04 am ET)
         
      Did Michael Savage have anything to do with the drought? likely, as did all of Fox News.

      KKKlannity is lying again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (September 24, 2009 9:56 am ET)
         
      Interestingly enough, Andrew Breitbart's Big Hollywood website, the same which broke the NEA propaganda scandal, reported on Paul Rodriguez and the delta smelt back on May 3rd, 2009, right bfore Hannity picked up on the story...

      Also, Paul Rodriguez was born in Mexico to migrant workers and he had mentioned on previous televised occasions that his family were effected by this matter. I am curious as to whether his family are in the country illegally...

      I guess it is okay for Hannity to support illegal immigrants, just as long as their target is Obama...

      ------------------------------
      http://www.themidnightreview.com
      http://www.mumistheword.org
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LynnTTT (September 24, 2009 10:26 am ET)
         
      Watching CSpan now 10.25 EST, and a Repub just did his one minute bit, basically quoting from the hannity show yesterday. Same stats, etc No, they don't take their orders form Fox.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (September 24, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
         
      A day late and a dollar short.
      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.