About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox distorts evidence to invent new White House/artists scandal

September 25, 2009 11:27 pm ET — 13 Comments

A FoxNews.com article distorted a report about a meeting Obama administration officials had with artists, falsely claiming that the report indicated that the White House "convened" the meeting in order to "push the president's domestic agenda." In fact, it reportedly was the artists involved -- not the White House -- that originally requested the meeting, and the Fox News article itself stated that one of the co-authors of the report that the article cited "said there was absolutely no pressure on any of the artists to follow a political line."

From the September 24 FoxNews.com article:

The White House convened a meeting of 60 artists to help push the president's domestic agenda in May, months before a controversial conference call with artists in August led to the reassignment and, on Thursday, the resignation of the communications director of the National Endowment for the Arts.

In what some critics are calling a "troubling" early effort by the Obama administration to politicize the NEA, rappers, dancers, writers and other activists from around the country were invited to a May 12 session next door to the White House, where they were "challenged to come up with promising and attractive ideas about how artists can work for the administration's agenda," according to a report written by organizers of the meeting.

[...]

One participant in the May 12 session "suggested the people in the room equaled a think tank to serve the administration's aims and asked how in practical terms we could connect to the administration's work," the report says.

[...]

It is the second such push to come to light, after an uproar over [then-NEA communications director Yosi] Sergant's statements on an Aug. 11 conference call with another set of artists, whom he asked to develop projects supporting initiatives on "health care, education, the environment" and other administration priorities.

Fox's claim that White House used meeting to push Obama "domestic agenda" contradicted by evidence -- including evidence it reported

Report's co-author "said there was absolutely no pressure on any of the artists to follow a political line" at White House meeting. In the first sentence of the article, Fox News claimed that the White House "convened" the briefing to "push the president's domestic agenda." Not until much later in the article, however, did Fox News report that the artists involved dispute both of these claims. In the 15th paragraph, Fox News reported that "[a]rtists who were present at the meeting in May said it was organized at their own behest." And the Fox News article reported in its 16th paragraph that one of the co-authors of the artists' report that Fox relied on for its article "said there was absolutely no pressure on any of the artists to follow a political line."

From the FoxNews.com article:

Artists who were present at the meeting in May said it was organized at their own behest to help promote "community, culture and the well-being of our nation."

Arlene Goldbard, a writer and one of the four artists who helped coordinate the process and prepare the meeting notes, said there was absolutely no pressure on any of the artists to follow a political line

"One staffer from the NEA spoke at the meeting. He extended greetings, talked briefly about the NEA, and took questions," Goldbard wrote in an e-mail to FOXNews.com.

"It is false to try to make anything more out of this. The meeting report is publicly available and speaks for itself."

Report Fox cited says artists' ability to "work with many public initiatives ... like job creation, education and labor" not part of briefing. The report, which was written by the artists who organized the meeting and which Fox News cited as the basis for its article, says that artists' potential roles in pushing several high-profile "public initiatives" were not part of the White House briefing -- a fact that appears to undermine the claim that the White House used the meeting to push its domestic agenda:

Second, almost every speaker assured us that the administration "gets it" when it comes to the importance of arts and culture to organizing for positive change.

This is encouraging, and as we understood going in, the opening exchange in a continuing conversation. After the briefing, we recognized there was ample room for mutual education, for artists and creative organizers to learn more about public policy and program development processes and how to work most effectively with the public sector; and for the administration to learn more about how artists and creative organizers can work with many public initiatives, including areas like job creation, education and labor, which were not represented at the briefing.

Fox distorts quotes to manufacture evidence of political pressure

Fox falsely suggested White House wrote that it "challenged" artists to "work for the administration's agenda." One paragraph after claiming that the White House "convened" the meeting, Fox News reported that the artists at the briefing "were 'challenged to come up with promising and attractive ideas about how artists can work for the administration's agenda,' according to a report written by organizers of the meeting" -- falsely suggesting that the White House wrote the report and acknowledged "challeng[ing]" the artists to "work for the administration's agenda." In fact, it was the artists -- not the White House -- that reportedly organized the meeting and wrote the report, and they did not allege that the White House actually "challenged" them to "work for the administration's agenda." Rather, the artists' report describes how, "overall," the artists "came away feeling."

From the report:

Overall, we came away feeling that there would be room at the table for artists and creative organizers to take part in conversations about relevant policies and programs; and that we were being challenged to come up with promising and attractive ideas about how artists can work for the administration's agenda and how artists' work can be integral to national recovery.

Fox failed to make clear that "participant" who suggested "serv[ing] the administration's aims" was not an admin. official. The Fox News article reported: "One participant in the May 12 session 'suggested the people in the room equaled a think tank to serve the administration's aims and asked how in practical terms we could connect to the administration's work,' the report says." But Fox News failed to explain that the "participant" who reportedly suggested this was a member of the arts community, not a member of the Obama administration.

From the report:

Q: William Cleveland, Center for the Study of Art & Community, noted that he appreciated [chief of staff for the White House Office of Public Liaison Mike] Strautmanis's words about seeking advice, input and connections. He suggested the people in the room equaled a think tank to serve the administration's aims, and asked how in practical terms we could connect to the administration's policy work.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by carlileb5935 (September 26, 2009 12:37 am ET)
      4 1
      What??? Obama wants to use ARTISTS to spread his message? Now we're doomed for sure! Everyone knows how easy they are to organize, and when they do....!

      The horror... the horror....!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
        2  
        That's pretty funny, Carlile.

        Let's see, we need some operatives to spread our message of evil. We need people who are easy to organize, love taking orders from other people, are all in lockstep with their ideas, and are very good at keeping secrets.

        Artists!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sambo (September 26, 2009 7:27 am ET)
      3  
      WHAT?? Fox distorts evidence ?? Naw
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (September 26, 2009 9:28 am ET)
      2  
      MMFA - I agree as well with your analysis ...

      But it begs this question, IMO: Why did Yosi resign??

      Either the admin also felt this was too close to pushing their agenda or they have absolutely no stomach for the right-wing storm of criticism and no resemblence of b*lls whatsoever.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 27, 2009 1:38 am ET)
        2  
        I think that if he continued in his post, the Fox News noise machine would have drowned out anything they would do, and prevent any work from getting done, and possibly damage the reputations of any artist that complied... the only problem with that is Fox News is going to complain regardless.

        The white House should have said "You got it wrong" and let Fox News to continue and be distracted... at least then they would stop reporting on trivial crap, or focus less time...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (September 26, 2009 9:45 am ET)
      8  
      This is the same crap that we saw with the President's speech to children and the syllabus sent to schools by the US Dept of Education. What did the DoE want kids to do? To write an essay to themselves about how they'd help the President reach his goals. The right then went batshit crazy over that idea. However, it really was innocuous. All along, the idea was for the kids to strive to reach reasonable goals - to stay in school and to try hard while there. Omigod. The right had a knee-jerk reaction to telling kids to help the President reach his goals.

      The artists want to help the President to reach reasonable and innocuous goals to help our nation. Omigod.

      Kids sang a song that innocuously and accurately protrayed a couple of initiatives pushed by Obama because he's the first Black President and it was Black History month. Omigod.

      FoxNews helps 2 conservatives (one who refused to call himself a conservative, and instead called himself a 'progressive radical - like he can make 'progressive' mean anything he wants it to mean) allege that ACORN is a 'remarkable criminal enterprise'. Omigod. What we have learned is true is that their evidence only shows that a couple of low level employees didn't have very good judgment or training.

      FoxNews distorts evidence? Tell me something I didn't already know.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Rosiea (September 26, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
          2
        How did Fox distort the facts? All they did was replay the audio!


        If there were no violations why did Yosi run away and hide?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by antihannity2009 (September 26, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
      7  
      I'm willing to be $1 trillion that no one would be complaining if Bush was doing this since his and Fox's "domestic agenda" are the same.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (September 26, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
      11  
      Cheney calls in the entire oil and gas power structure of the country for a meeting to set our energy policy, all's well in Fox land.

      But Obama meets with some ARTISTS and it's cry havoc, the hounds of hell gather at the gates to guzzle blood from our throats! RUN, RUN!

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (September 26, 2009 10:19 pm ET)
        5  
        Good one Randy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (September 26, 2009 10:26 pm ET)
        7  
        I am waiting for the moment when one of Fox News hosts says go have a shot at the President, some one does, and Fox News claims freedom of speech.
        Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace