About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Conservative media raise ACORN bogeyman to baselessly cast doubt on Franken's campaign victory

September 29, 2009 11:14 am ET — 37 Comments

The Fox Nation, Gateway Pundit blog, and Mickey Kaus all highlighted a Minneapolis Star Tribune column to claim or suggest that ACORN stole the 2008 Minnesota Senate election for Sen. Al Franken (D). In fact, the column -- which Gateway Pundit and Kaus falsely claimed was a Star Tribune "report" or "story" -- did not contain a single allegation of a fraudulently cast vote, and the Minnesota Supreme Court stated that counsel for Franken's 2008 opponent, Norm Coleman, "confirmed at oral argument that Coleman makes no claim of fraud on the part of either voters or election officials."

Media cite Star Tribune columnist to tie ACORN bogeyman to Franken victory

Star Tribune columnist Katherine Kersten: "Did ACORN folks pull some fast ones to help get their favorite son Franken elected?" Kersten wrote: "Here in Minnesota, ACORN has boasted of playing a major role in the 2008 elections. It claims to have registered 43,000 new voters, which it describes as 75 percent of the state's new registrations. Franken's margin of victory in the Senate race was razor-thin: 312 votes out of about 3 million cast. And Minnesota's laws on proof of voter eligibility are notoriously loose." Kersten added: "Did ACORN folks pull some fast ones to help get their favorite son Franken elected -- a win that handed Democrats the 60-vote, veto-proof majority that they needed to enact their liberal agenda? Secretary of State Mark Ritchie assures us that Minnesota's system of voter verification protects electoral integrity. But here's an uncomfortable fact: Ritchie himself was endorsed by the now-notorious ACORN and elected with its help." [Minneapolis Star Tribune, 9/26/09]

Gateway Pundit: "Figures. ACORN Was Behind Franken's Stolen Senate Seat." Following Kersten's column, GatewayPundit.com posted a piece with the headline, "Figures. ACORN Was Behind Franken's Stolen Senate Seat." The post falsely claimed that Kersten's opinion piece constituted a Star Tribune "report." The post stated, "Here's a shocker. ACORN may have helped Al Franken steal the US senate seat from Minnesota." It then added, "The Minnesot [sic] Star-Tribune reported," and then quoted extensively from Kersten's piece. [GatewayPundit.com, 9/28/09]

Fox Nation: "New Questions About ACORN Role in Franken's Victory." From a Fox Nation headline linking to Kersten's column:

foxnationfranken

Mickey Kaus: "Did ACORN chicanery elect Al Franken? That's the import of this tactfully phrased Minneapolis Star Tribune story." On his Slate.com blog, Kausfiles, Mickey Kaus linked to Kersten's column, which he falsely claimed was a "Minneapolis Star Tribune story," and stated: "Did ACORN chicanery elect Al Franken? That's the import of this tactfully phrased Minneapolis Star Tribune story. Franken won by 312 votes. ACORN claimed to have registered 48,000 new Minnesota voters. If just 1% were ineligible but cast ballots, or had ballots cast for them illegally, and survived the recount process ... that's 480 votes, almost certainly overwhelmingly cast for Franken. ... Maybe in pristine Minnesota even ACORN is clean. If so, the state would apparently be an outlier." [Kausfiles, 9/28/09]

Star Tribune column does not contain a single allegation of a fraudulently cast vote

Star Tribune column contains no allegations about fraudulently cast votes in Minnesota. Kersten's column acknowledges that in Minnesota, ACORN "has so far been able to keep its nose relatively clean." Kersten does not point to any allegations that any vote was fraudulently cast in Minnesota. Indeed, she states that "Secretary of State Mark Ritchie assures us that Minnesota's system of voter verification protects electoral integrity." She then added, "But here's an uncomfortable fact: Ritchie himself was endorsed by the now-notorious ACORN and elected with its help."

Column highlights allegations of fraudulent registration in Minnesota and other states, not fraudulent votes. Rather than point to any evidence of fraudulently cast votes, Kersten highlighted allegations of voter registration fraud in Minnesota and other states. For instance, Kersten stated: "In October 2008, ACORN announced triumphantly that it had registered about 1.3 million new voters in 18 battleground states, among them Minnesota. A few weeks later, however, the director of Project Vote -- an ACORN affiliate -- acknowledged to the New York Times that election officials had rejected about 400,000 of those, for reasons including duplicate registrations, incomplete forms and (in the Times' words) 'fraudulent submissions from low-paid field workers trying to please their supervisors.' "

Justice Department statistics do not support suggestion that fraudulent registrations lead to fraudulent votes. As Media Matters for America has documented, during the 2008 election, media frequently reported Republican charges that ACORN was engaged in "voter fraud," echoing charges of voter fraud Republicans had made in previous elections. In fact, while a 2005 Senate Republican Policy Committee paper claimed, "[v]oter fraud continues to plague our nation's federal elections, diluting and canceling out the lawful votes of the vast majority of Americans," Justice Department statistics indicate that few actual instances of voter fraud have been prosecuted in recent years. According to a report by the Justice Department's Criminal Division of prosecutions between October 2002 and September 2005, the Justice Department charged 95 people with "election fraud" and convicted 55. Among those, however, just 17 individuals were convicted for casting fraudulent ballots; cases against three other individuals were pending at the time of the report. In addition, the Justice Department convicted one election official of submitting fraudulent ballots and convicted five individuals of registration fraud, with cases against 12 individuals pending at the time of the report. Thirty-two individuals were convicted of other "election fraud" issues, including people convicted of offenses arising from "a scheme to block the phone lines used by two Manchester [New Hampshire] organizations to arrange drives to the polls during the 2002 general election" -- in other words, these convictions were connected to voter suppression efforts, not voter fraud. Several other people listed in the report were convicted of vote buying.

NYU's Brennan Center: "[W]e are aware of no recent substantiated case in which registration fraud has resulted in fraudulent votes being cast." From a 2007 report by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice:

There have been several documented and widely publicized instances in which registration forms have been fraudulently completed and submitted. But it is extraordinarily difficult to find reported cases in which individuals have submitted registration forms in someone else's name in order to impersonate them at the polls. Furthermore, most reports of registration fraud do not actually claim that the fraud happens so that ineligible people can vote at the polls. Indeed, we are aware of no recent substantiated case in which registration fraud has resulted in fraudulent votes being cast.

Coleman challenged vote count but did not make a single allegation of vote fraud

Minnesota Supreme Court stated that Coleman did not make any allegations of vote fraud. In its decision rejecting Coleman's appeal of the decision declaring Franken the winner of the 2008 Minnesota Senate race, the Minnesota Supreme Court stated that "[n]o claim of fraud in the election or during the recount was made by either party" and that "Coleman's counsel confirmed at oral argument that Coleman makes no claim of fraud on the part of either voters or election officials."

St. Paul Pioneer Press: Experts said there was a "lack of crookedness in the election." The Pioneer Press reported in a June 29 article (via Nexis): "Experts said the lack of crookedness in the election, as well as a commitment to the law and not politics, allowed the five state high court justices to explore the key issues in depth." The Pioneer Press added: "Rick Hasen, an election law professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, said the court's ruling Tuesday was so thorough that it also ruled out the possibility that either candidate -- or their lawyers -- could be accused of stealing the election."

Fox News, conservative media have repeatedly baselessly claimed MN election was stolen

Conservative media promote stolen election claims. As Media Matters has documented, Fox News personalities have repeatedly promoted baseless claims of fraud in the Minnesota race and claimed that there was a lack of impartiality in the recount process to accuse Franken of "stealing" the election. Additionally, radio host Jim Quinn has claimed the Minnesota Senate race was "stolen" and that ACORN played a role.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 29, 2009 11:19 am ET)
      4  
      "ACORN claimed to have registered 48,000 new Minnesota voters."

      It does not say ACORN registered 48,000 Franken voters...

      ----------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (September 29, 2009 11:26 am ET)
        2  
        Continueing noise machine meme, only republican victories can be legitimate.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (September 29, 2009 11:29 am ET)
      4  
      I haven't seen much evidence that the Dems are trying to enact a "liberal agenda." I wish they were. And Franken won fair and square. There are no allegations of voter fraud so WTF are these jokers even talking about. Does a non-profit have the same "person" rights as a corporation? Seems like ACORN could sue for libel.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (September 29, 2009 11:37 am ET)
      2  
      Talk about sore losers, this bunch takes the cake.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Craig (September 29, 2009 11:46 am ET)
        2  
        In the bookstore the other day I saw something that put a smile on my face. The cover of Townhall magazine (yes, they have a dead tree version of that garbage).

        [http://lh3.ggpht.com/_mmT4C7gERxg/Sq6SeWu3kCI/AAAAAAAACnM/_JcNVY1KoSI/s800/September]
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (September 29, 2009 11:55 am ET)
          4  
          Yes, I saw this garbage once, too. A couple of years ago, I went to a grocery store in my daughter's college town, the one not near the campus, and this rag was on the shelf. I was shocked at how negative the content was and told my husband. He had already found the website, so he was prepared. Ah well, and they say liberals are angry all the time. I'm not angry, astounded and frustrated, maybe, but angry, no.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 29, 2009 11:57 am ET)
          5  
          *barf* Is that a REAL mag, or just a spoof?!

          "Fresh, Conservtaive, Intelligent Reporting"

          That's a tagline that will take me awhile to wrap my head around all the ways that it's just wrong.

          Must be an homage to The American Prospect's, "Liberal Intelligence." (Great site, BTW.)

          They even kept the white text-on-red title block. Real original, reallt creative. (Probably just like the 'facts' they show inside!)

          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Here's some more Liberal Intelligence!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (September 29, 2009 11:40 am ET)
      2  
      Yes, ACORN magically peered into the future from 2007, knowing somehow (crystal ball?) that the Democrats would have 59 seats in the Senate once the elections were over. Realizing how important the 60 vote majority could be to health care, waaaaay back in 2007, they worked hard to register people to vote to ensure the Franken win. They worried, though, that legitimate voters would not be enough, and so they somehow fraudulently cast votes in the 2008 election? Really?

      Or, maybe they just think it's important to reach out to the community and make sure everyone eligible is registered to vote, since the more people who vote, the better our democracy works.

      Now, which do YOU think is more likely?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (September 29, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
        5  
        Hey, they're almost as prescient as Barack Obama's kin putting that birth announcement in the paper all those years ago, and having birthed him in Hawaii. They just knew he was gonna grow up and be the president.

        I'm gonna say from what I've been hearing so far, that Franken is a really good senator. I love the way he handled the loony tea baggers on the health care debate. He won them over. I think people really underestimated this guy. He's obviously very intelligent. And he has a heart.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (September 29, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
          3  
          Al showed his intelligence and comprehension of issues on his radio show. Now I wish we had more senators that had a real grasp of issues (on both sides of the aile...)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (September 29, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
            1  
            aisle. oops.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (September 29, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
              3  
              Yes, he did display a very good grasp of issues, and he was willing to listen to people on the opposite side of things. Very much like what Thom Hartmann and Randi Rhodes do.

              And he is really more of a centrist for anybody who didn't have to opportunity to listen to his show, although I coulda done without the lepruchan bit :-0)

              Oy! Oy! Oy!
              Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (September 29, 2009 11:41 am ET)
      3  
      Katherine Kersten is notorious here in MN for promoting factually-dubious right wing positions.

      The conservative credo: "Evidence of vote fraud? Who needs evidence when we can just hint at vague suspicions based on paranoid fantasies? That's enough basis for accusations."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Appleboy (September 29, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
        2  
        I agree. I get the StarTrib every day and whenever I see an article by her I laugh and then immediately turn the page. This woman is a complete idiot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (September 29, 2009 11:41 am ET)
      1  
      17 people have been convicted of vote fraud. Out of how many votes cast in federal, state and local elections over that timeframe?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 29, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
        2  
        If you took every actual fraudulent vote ever cast in the history of this country, you probably would have enough to flip even a single state from Obama to McCain. These people are sore losers, and (worse) evil scumbags who are smearing an organizatioon that HELPS PEOPLE (that fact is undeniable) just so they can score political points. Home Ownership, Voter Registration... who cares if it doesn't help the Republicans, right?

        I mean... God forbid the Republican Party ever did anything to help anyone else!

        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        All they're good at is probaganda. They suck soooo bad.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (September 29, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
        4  
        There was actually one case of vote fraud discovered in MN in the last election. The guy, convicted of "having sexual contact with a 15-year-old girl when he was 20," voted while on probation. He says he voted for Coleman.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Ed753 (October 01, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
           
        Seven-teen (17) or Seven-tee (70)? Just a little bit of a difference, and as we know, just like a speeder on the highway, not everyone gets caught, and of the ones that get caught, not everyone gets ticket, and of the ones that get a ticket, only a portion get convicted.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by EmmetC (September 29, 2009 11:53 am ET)
      2  
      What do you call people who baselessly and repeatedly claim that ACORN is responsible for massive voter fraud?

      NUTS.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (September 29, 2009 11:53 am ET)
      3  
      It's patriotic to help people to register to vote.

      Yes, if ACORN hadn't helped anyone to register to vote in Minnesota, then we would still have Senator Norm Coleman.

      And that result wouldn't reflect the will of the plurality of Minnesotan citizens.

      The recent close election in Minnesota shows why ACORN is good, not why it's bad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MiddleLeft (September 29, 2009 11:59 am ET)
      1  
      Secretary of State Mark Ritchie assures us that Minnesota's system of voter verification protects electoral integrity. But here's an uncomfortable fact: Ritchie himself was endorsed by the now-notorious ACORN and elected with its help."

      By now ACORN has been sufficiently vilified that anyone they endorse or anyone who has the slightest remote connection such as liberals, progressives, democrats, children, and the poor are all suspect. Pity anyone whose family name or business sounds like "Acorn".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (September 29, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
      3  
      It literally boggles my mind how conservatives can just avoid all uncomfortable facts in life, just to point at weird little conspiracy theories that have no basis in reality.

      I.e. I recently went for a laugh in discussing an idiot on youtube, who went on to claim that "individualism isn't allowed in socialist nanny-states". When asked what countries he means, the U.K. was one of them...

      These morons have no clue about reality, and they're really acting like a cult. Hell, Scientologists are more open to the outside world than they are!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LORISNJ (September 29, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
      4  
      These people are out of their minds - really, voter fraud? After the 2000 selection by the Supreme Court and in 2004, Blackwell doing what he said he would do which is give GWB Ohio as Sec of State and making those in Democratic districts wait in long lines due to lack of voting machines and having the machines drop the vote for President when you vote Democratic party across the board, and where the exit polls showed Kerry winning but the machines showed Bush won; now they are concerned with voter fraud?

      Shame on them, all of them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (September 29, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
      2  
      This is a perfect example of how the right manufactures the news. First they put out a story line through a question no one is asking.

      "Did ACORN folks pull some fast ones to help get their favorite son Franken elected?"

      Then others link to it as settled fact.

      "Figures. ACORN Was Behind Franken's Stolen Senate Seat."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fishergirlusmc (September 29, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
        2 8
        Doesn't it seem a little strange from a mathematical point of view that Coleman originally one by around 250 votes and then when the votes were recounted dozens of times he gained zero votes and all the votes went to Al Franken?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (September 29, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
          9  
          Wow, how many completely ignorant things can you squeeze into a single post? There was one recount. Only one. Not "dozens." During that recount both candidates gained hundreds of votes, over 700 for Coleman, whose initial lead was 212 votes. The entire swing was about 2/1,000th of one percent of the votes cast in the election. It's actually a miniscule swing and well within the realm of what's statistically likely.

          The only thing that seems "a little strange" is where conservatives come up with these bizarre talking points that have to relation to reality.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Talisman (September 30, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
               
            Without actually researching it I was also under the impression that there were several recounts and these Al Franken votes started appearing out of the woodwork.

            It is amazing how right wing media blitz works. You hear it enough times from various sources (AM radio, morning shock jock radio, editorials,cable news), you just stop questioning it.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (September 30, 2009 1:35 am ET)
            2
          The only thing strange (or maybe not so strange?) fishergirlusmc is that you are dumb enough to actually say something so pathetic!

          Congrats thou... you said your right-wing stupid for the day... now stay in your parents basement like a good little right-winger, flip on the Rush Limbaugh radio puke-fest in the morning and have an apple!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (September 29, 2009 2:01 pm ET)
      7  
      News Flash direct from Faux Noise: ACORN is NOW responsible for WWI, WWII, HIV, and Global Warming...which FAUX denies as being real EXCEPT in areas where it can be linked to ACORN.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by aaniko (September 29, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
         
      Oh please, who in their right mind would have actually voted for Al Franken. The guy is the biggest joke in the world.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Talisman (September 30, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
           

        This is the stuff I love. For some reason the noise machine hates poor Al. Not just "your on the other side" hates, but truly hates. I think its because he actually did something beyond whinning and writing a few books, none of those wimps were willing to do that.

        And since Senator Franken is an ex-comedian, he may just take that as a compliment.
        Report Abuse