About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh baselessly accused Jennings of encouraging sexual relationship between student, adult

October 01, 2009 12:49 pm ET — 17 Comments

Rush Limbaugh baselessly accused Department of Education official Kevin Jennings of having "encouraged" and "facilitated" a sexual relationship between a male high school student and an older man. In fact, there is no evidence that Jennings either "encouraged" or "facilitated" the relationship; indeed, Jennings has stated simply that he "listened, sympathized, and offered advice" to the student who was struggling with his sexuality.

Limbaugh claimed Jennings "encouraged" relationship between student, adult

Limbaugh: "Obama's safe school czar is a guy promoting homosexuality in the schools and encouraged a 15-year-old kid to have a homosexual relationship with an older man, and even facilitated it." During the September 28 edition of his radio show, Limbaugh sought to compare film director Roman Polanski, currently facing extradition for the 1978 rape of a 13-year old girl, and stated, "[I]f you wonder why the libs are really ticked off that Roman Polanski might be extradited to face the music on that long-ago act with the 13-year-old girl, Quaaludes and rape, understand that Obama's safe school czar is a guy promoting homosexuality in the schools and encouraged a 15-year-old kid to have a homosexual relationship with an older man, and even facilitated it." [Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show, 9/28/09]

Evidence does not support claim that Jennings "encouraged" and "facilitated" relationship

Jennings: "I listened, sympathized, and offered advice." In his 1994 book, Jennings described "Brewster" as "a charming but troubled kid" who "was not very happy with himself." Jennings wrote that he "didn't have a clue as to why -- at least not at first," and went on to describe an incident in which "Brewster" was brought into his office and discussed his homosexuality by telling "a story about his involvement with an older man he had met in Boston." Jennings wrote that he "listened, sympathized, and offered advice," and "Brewster" left his "office with a smile on his face that Jennings "would see every time" he "saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated." From his book:

I remember Brewster, a sophomore boy who I came to know in 1987, my first year of teaching at Concord Academy, in Concord, Massachusetts. Brewster was a charming but troubled kid. His grades didn't match up with his potential, his attendance could be irregular, and he often seemed a little out of it. He was clearly using some substance regularly, and was not very happy with himself. But I didn't have a clue as to why -- at least not at first.

[...]

Toward the end of my first year, during the spring of 1988, Brewster appeared in my office in the tow of one of my advisees, a wonderful young woman to whom I had been "out" for a long time. "Brewster has something he needs to talk with you about," she intoned ominously. Brewster squirmed at the prospect of telling, and we sat silently for a short while. On a hunch, I suddenly asked, "What's his name?" Brewster's eyes widened briefly, and then out spilled a story about his involvement with an older man he had met in Boston. I listened, sympathized, and offered advice. He left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated.

I was thrilled to be able do for Brewster what I had wanted Mr. Korn to do for me ten years before. But the conversation also left me troubled. I had been playing a variation on the "don't ask, don't tell" game with my students. If they asked, I told, but otherwise my sexual identity was not a fit topic for discussion. I grew uncomfortable with the message this was sending, with the air of secrecy and shame and scandal that my quasi silence implied. I decided I needed to come out in a more forthright and honest fashion, and made plans to do so the fall of 1988, my second year at Concord. [One Teacher in Ten, pages 24-25]

Jennings later said he counseled on the use of condoms to prevent HIV. In a 2000 speech to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Jennings offered more detail as to the advice he gave to "Brewster." Jennings said after "Brewster" told him of the incident involving an older man, "I didn't know what to say, knew I should say something quickly. So I finally -- my best friend had just died of AIDS the week before -- I looked at Brewster and said, 'You know, I hope you knew to use a condom.' He said to me something I will never forget, He said 'Why should I, my life isn't worth saving anyway.' "

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (October 01, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
      3  
      This is an example of homophobia trying to be cloaked by righteous indignation.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (October 01, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
          3
        Perhaps. Jennings might also have said "hey kid, it's ok if you're gay, it's not ok to pick up older men in bus station bathrooms." I think the latter would be preferred of a "safe schools advisor" by most reasonable people.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 01, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
          4 2
          Perhaps? you don't know what Jennings said?

          Perhaps, you don't even know what you're talking about?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (October 01, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
              5
            I was "perhaps-ing" Dell's assertion that this was an example of homophobia...it had nothing to do with what Jennings said at all. PERHAPS...you should read more closely.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by westla (October 01, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
              4  
              I don't think this from Limbaugh can be anything other than homophobia. Jennings did not encourage any sexual relationship, that is ridiculous. I do agree with you that perhaps he could have counseled him on the dangers and ill-advised conduct of sex in some public bathroom, but I also do not believe Jennings acted inappropriately with his advice either. He had just lost a friend to AIDS, his remarks were also in that context. I mean the guy is a human being too.

              Those making this out to be something other than it is are reprehensible. Limbaugh usually tops that list.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by westla (October 01, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
                   
                Sorry, did not act inappropriately.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by westla (October 01, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
                     
                  Not my day, disregard my correction. My original post did not need it.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by dexteritas0071418 (October 01, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
                    3
                  I understood what you meant the first time =-)

                  I think it's Obama derangement syndrome with Limbaugh, and homophobia with most other conservative head-exploders.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by westla (October 01, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
                    4  
                    I guess what motivates them is really irrelevant. They are entitled to be homophobic, but to display it either overtly or not in order to unjustly trash a political opponent in the way Limbaugh is doing in this instance is unconscionable.

                    If he were to just come out and say he really doesn't care for gay people that would be one thing, his opinion. But to hang this onto Jennings head as if he were some sexual deviant out to foster underage encounters is irresponsible and downright evil.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 01, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
                 
              Sorry Dex, my apologies.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 01, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
          3  
          We don't know, and Limbaugh sure has no basis for sayin what he said based upon what we do know. The teacher knew that this kid was troubled before the event in question ever happened, so it's quite likely they talked multiple times.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by westla (October 01, 2009 2:24 pm ET)
            4  
            You are right. It's another cheap political shot. It's what these people do. They take one event from someone's past, a snapshot of that event, and manipulate it, soil it and rake it over the coals; knowing it will be picked up and repeated by their talk show brethren until that event, in its manipulated and distorted new form, finally identifies the person they are out to destroy - all for political gain, or whatever unseemly motive there is. It's horrible.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (October 01, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
              3  
              Yeah, then they tell us that we are the ones who take Beck, Limbaugh, et al out of context.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 01, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
      3  
      el Fathead,

      is a dishonest and despicable individual. There's nothing else you can say. The fact that he has a microphone and perch to destroy people's lives for cheap political points is a travesty and disgraces our nation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 01, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
      2  
      What the hell is wrong with these people?!

      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      Scumbags to a man. All of them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (October 01, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
      5  
      Rush probably knows a thing or 2 about sex between an adult and somsone under the age of 18. What WAS he doing in the DR with a prescription for Viagra anyway? Nobody has ever really said.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.