About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity opens mouth, falsehoods about "czars" spill out

October 02, 2009 11:43 am ET — 12 Comments

Continuing Fox News' witch hunt against Obama administration officials the news network has labeled "czars," Sean Hannity advanced a laundry list of false, baseless, or misleading claims about Department of Education official Kevin Jennings, White House science adviser John Holdren, State Department official Harold Koh, and Energy Secretary Steven Chu. For instance, Hannity suggested -- despite evidence to the contrary -- that Jennings covered up statutory rape; falsely claimed that Holdren "supports, you know, forced sterilization"; and smeared Koh by repeating the claim that Koh "says, well, Sharia law can be applied in American courts."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Hannity smears Jennings by suggesting Jennings covered up statutory rape

Hannity: Jennings did not tell authorities about "statutory rape" of 15-year-old. From the "Great American Panel" segment of the October 1 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: All right. So we have, you know, another czar in trouble -- and many of them. All right, the latest one, this guy Kevin Jennings. You know, here's a guy -- you're a pastor -- and a 15-year-old kid goes into his office, seeks advice. He's having a relationship with an older -- with an adult, which, by the way, he said it was 15. That would be statutory rape.

And does he call the police, does he tell authorities, does he get in counseling? No, he asks him if he wore a condom.

Obenshain: Jennings is "a mandatory reporter as a teacher, and yet allowed this to happen without protecting the child." During the segment, panelist Kate Obenshain, vice president of Young America's Foundation, asserted: "But for the man who is supposed to be promoting safe schools -- he's a mandatory reporter as a teacher, and yet allowed this to happen without protecting the child."

Jennings' attorney: Conversation was "with a sixteen-year-old student"; "no factual basis" that Jennings was "aware of any sexual victimization of any student." In an August 3, 2004, letter, Constance M. Boland of the law firm Nixon Peabody -- which represented the organization that Jennings ran -- wrote that the "conversation" Jennings had was with "a sixteen-year-old student" and that there "is no factual basis whatsoever for" the "claim that Mr. Jennings engaged in unethical practices, or that he was aware of any sexual victimization of any student, or that he declined to report any sexual victimization at any time." [Boland letter, 8/3/04]. 

Massachusetts age of consent is -- and was at the time -- 16. As Media Matters has also documented, at the time Jennings had the conversation with the student, the age of consent as provided by chapter 119, section 51A, of the General Laws of Massachusetts was 16.

Massachusetts law required reporting by those with reason to believe child "is suffering serious physical or emotional injury resulting from abuse," and lawyer said Jennings had no reason to believe student was abused. In 1988, teachers in Massachusetts were required to make a report if they had "reasonable cause to believe that a child under the age of eighteen years is suffering serious physical or emotional injury resulting from abuse inflicted upon him including sexual abuse." In her letter, Jennings' attorney Boland stated, "Nowhere in the book does Mr. Jennings state that he understood the student was being abused or victimized, or that he suffered injury from any abuse." Boland added, "Based on the plain meaning of the words in the book, it is clear that Mr. Jennings had no 'reasonable cause to believe' that the student was being abused in any way. Because there was no abuse and no 'sexual victimization,' the statute does not apply." [Boland letter, 8/3/04]

CNN debunked statutory rape charge. CNN has repeatedly noted that Jennings' book does not support the allegation that the student Jennings counseled was the victim of statutory rape.

Hannity guest notes anti-gay aspects to campaign against Jennings. During the segment, panelist Pastor Jacques DeGraff stated, "[P]eople who are raising these objections, many of them have problems with homosexuals in schools. And those are stated problems -- that many of the issues are about they promote homosexuality in school. So why don't we say that?" Media Matters has documented the anti-gay rhetoric used by members of the conservative media to attack Jennings.

Hannity falsely claims Holdren supports forced sterilization

Hannity claims Holdren "supports, you know, forced sterilization." Obenshain stated during the segment, "I think that Barack Obama has made a decision to surround himself with people who are activists. You look at who he's chosen for these czars. And these are not somebody who have mistakenly tumbled into these positions. They've been selected." Hannity responded, "I mentioned that earlier. I mean, you have, you know, Holdren, who supports, you know, forced sterilization." Later, Hannity similarly asked, "What about the guy that supported forced sterilization, again, in a book?"

Hannity has repeatedly distorted Holdren's words to attack him on sterilization, abortion. Hannity has repeatedly distorted Holdren's words to falsely claim that Holdren supported forced sterilization and abortion. In fact, Holdren never "advocated" for any kind of involuntary birth control; he co-authored an environmental sciences book more than 30 years ago that discusses "compulsory control of family size" including abortion and sterilization as a possible consequence for countries whose expanding birth rates are not curbed by "milder methods." 

Hannity smear: Koh "says, well, Sharia law can be applied in American courts"

Hannity repeats smear that Koh supported use of Sharia law in U.S. courts. Hannity also said, "You have another guy that says, well, Sharia law can be applied in American courts." Hannity has previously made that claim about Harold Koh, the State Department legal adviser. The claim has been denied by Koh himself during Senate testimony, Koh's spokesman, and the organizer of the event at which Koh supposedly made the remarks about Sharia law. In addition, University of California-Davis law professor Anupam Chander wrote in an April 2 blog post that "[i]n the 71 articles penned by Harold Koh that appear in the Westlaw law review database, there is but one article that mentions Sharia," and in that article, Koh "denounces the government of Iran for 'impos[ing] a strict form of Sharia law that denies basic rights to women and minorities.' "

Hannity attacks Chu for advocating for white roofs, which would help environment

Hannity: "You have another guy who wants to paint every roof in America white." Hannity also said: "You have another guy who wants to paint every roof in America white." Hannity did not specify to whom he was referring, but Energy Secretary Steven Chu said in London: "There's a friend of mine, a colleague of mine, Art Rosenfeld, who's pushing very hard for a geo-engineering we all believe will be completely benign, and that's when you have a flat-top roof building, make it white. Now, you smile, but he's done a calculation, and if you take all the buildings and make their roofs white and if you make the pavement more of a concrete type of color rather than a black type of color, and you do this uniformly ... it's the equivalent of reducing the carbon emissions due to all the cars on the road for 11 years."

Research indicates that making changes Chu advocated "could mean a one-time reduction of 44 billion tons of carbon dioxide." Hannity did not note that a recent study "estimate[s] that permanently retrofitting urban roofs and pavements in the tropical and temperate regions of the world with solar-reflective materials would offset 44 billion tonnes of emitted CO2, worth $1.1 trillion at $25/tonne." The study adds: "How can the reader visualize this one time offset of 44 billion tonnes of CO2? The average world car emits about 4 tonnes of CO2 each year. Permanently increasing the solar reflectance of urban roofs and pavements worldwide would offset 11 billion car-years of emission."

Hannity attacks on "czars" part of Fox News witch hunt

Hannity, Beck, others have repeatedly attacked Obama administration officials with falsehoods. Following the lead of Fox News' Glenn Beck, who has repeatedly attacked Obama administration "czars" with falsehoods, smears, and misinformation, on September 18, Hannity aired a list of "10 people who President Obama has appointed or nominated to work on your behalf in your government" and asked, "Should any of them be fired?" Hannity's case for dismissing the advisers largely consisted of false attacks, distortions, and trivial guilt by association. During that segment, Hannity attacked Holdren, Koh, and other Obama administration officials. Additionally, on September 30, Hannity said of Jennings, "I want him fired."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 02, 2009 11:55 am ET)
      4  
      Hasn't
      anyone
      noticed?
      No
      infalible
      truth
      yet!

      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      No Fox viewers have, anyway.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (October 02, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
      6 1
      Hannity opens mouth, falsehoods about "czars" spill out

      I normally don't nitpick about MMFA headlines, but don't you think specifying czars as the falsehood is going a bit over the top.

      I was thinking the headline really didn't need the words "about czars"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (October 02, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
      6  
      when HANNITY opens his mouth s--t spills out.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (October 02, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
      7  
      Maybe Sean Hannity is taking a cue from George Costanza from Sienfeld's Season Six episode The Beard...

      "It's Not A Lie, If You Believe It"

      -------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 02, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
        4  
        Which is almost as good as something I heard said, and said seriously, in New Orleans a couple of years ago: "It ain't racist if you're white."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 02, 2009 12:57 pm ET)
          4  
          Con, did you run into one of the regular MMFA posters in NO?
          The ones who insist on telling everybody, over and over, that they're not racist, and jump in to defend anybody documented making racist remarks?

          You obviously aren't up to speed with the new definitions.Using racist code words and dog whistles are absolutely not racist, as long as one doesn't scream out racial slurs or mention race directly.

          Noticing this new, sneakier version of racism, however, is the real racism.

          I think I've got that right.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Cheney2012 (October 03, 2009 12:07 am ET)
              8
            Col.

            You've never gotten anything right and that perfect record will probably continue far into the future.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (October 03, 2009 10:28 am ET)
            1  
            Congrats, Col.
            Getting the bird from this turkey is a great character reference.
            Nomen est omen
            Report Abuse
    • Author by TheDayV (October 02, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
      5  
      "Brian Birdwell - 9/11 Pentagon Survivor"

      ...Um.... Didn't Coulter make a book about how Liberals supposedly hide behind national tragedies in order to advance their political agenda? Didn't she flout it like seven or eight times on Hannity's show?

      The 9/11 widows wrote a book that criticized foreign policy especially in terms of the war on terror. Granted, the loss of their husbands didn't give them some kind of sudden awareness of the intricacies of international terrorism, but it did give them some moral weight when it came to objecting to an immoral war being carried out in the name of their husbands.

      But this? Birdwell survived burns to over half his body and made a complete recovery, and congratulations to him for that. But experiencing the tragedy of 9/11 at a greater proximity and to a greater extent than others does not grant you expertise in public educational policy nor in interpreting events that occurred 20 years ago. He's a showpiece. And he knows it.

      Finally, they keep saying that the student was 15 at the time when in fact he was 16. Such repetition reinforces the fallacy in the minds of the viewers with the end goal being that they'll never believe anyone that says, rightfully, that Jennings' hands were legally tied.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jimmydeanbakker (October 03, 2009 11:13 am ET)
           
        I think you’re right. Talk radio has been throwing out so many falsehoods mixed with a a few truths that its listeners now cannot stomach the truth.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (October 03, 2009 2:28 am ET)
         
      I am anxious to see how they try to spin the truth about Sen John Ensign of Nevada, who has apparently really violated Senate rules about helping lobbyists - he was hoping to keep his affair secret.

      And Sen Tom Coburn of Oklahoma is trying to pretend that telling Ensign to be honest and admit to the affair was all that he is required to do - ah, no, Senator. You don't get to keep a secret like that which involves taxpayer dollars and lobbyist interaction rules violations!

      Hannity will open his mouth and have more falsehoods come out on this topic too I predict.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jdlaughead (October 05, 2009 2:49 am ET)
           
        Obama's BIRTH NOTICES in the two Honolulu papers in 1961 should end this bunch of lies from the Radical Reich wing Conservatives!

        http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&safe=off&um=1&q=obama%27s+Birth+notice&sa=N&start=0&ndsp=18
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.