About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity cites rationing in U.K. to attack public option -- but U.S. insurance companies already ration care

October 08, 2009 9:45 am ET — 20 Comments

On his Fox News show, Sean Hannity attacked the public option by stating that "[e]verywhere socialized medicine has been tried it's failed. It ends up in rationing," and pointing to women with breast cancer in Great Britain who are denied drugs by "the government rationing body." But Hannity's attack that "the government option" would introduce rationing for "women with breast cancer" is undermined by the fact that private insurance companies in the United States already ration care; in fact, private insurers routinely deny care to cancer patients, often because they are found to have pre-existing conditions.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Hannity claims "socialized medicine" leads to "rationing," cites women denied treatment for cancer in Great Britain

From the October 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: You want -- you want the government option?

[...]

HANNITY: See, here's the problem. Everywhere socialized medicine has been tried, it's failed. It ends up in rationing. It ends up in rationing. It ends up bankrupting the country. You know, look at Great Britain recently. Women with breast cancer, they were denied drugs by who? The government rationing body.

Hannity's attack ignores that private insurance companies in the United States already deny care for cancer patients

Insurance companies ration care by rescinding coverage. As former senior executive at CIGNA health insurance company Wendell Potter explained in June 24 Senate testimony, insurance companies restrict or deny coverage by rescinding health insurance policies on the grounds that people had undisclosed pre-existing conditions.

Retired nurse had double mastectomy surgery delayed because of pre-existing conditions. Retired nurse Robin Beaton testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee and stated that her private insurance company canceled a double mastectomy surgery she had scheduled to treat her breast cancer after learning that she had a pre-existing heart condition. Beaton testified that her insurance company then canceled her coverage entirely, stating: "[T]he first time I filed a claim and was suspected of having cancer they searched high and low for a reason to cancel me." Beaton said she was eventually able to have surgery after her congressman worked to have her insurance reinstated. [Energy and Commerce Committee testimony, 6/16/09]

California woman reportedly denied surgery after breast cancer spread to her brain. A KPIX CBS 5 news article reported that Shelly Andrews-Buta was scheduled to undergo surgery to treat breast cancer that had spread to her brain, but that "instead of having doctors working to remove her brain tumors on the day the surgery was scheduled, she sat in a San Francisco hotel room. Why? Because at the last minute, her insurance company, Blue Shield, decided it wasn't going to pay for the treatment her doctors at UCSF Medical Center had recommended." According to the article, Blue Shield told Andrews-Buta it would pay for a less expensive procedure, even though her doctor said "that wasn't the best option" for her cancer. [KPIX CBS 5, 5/12/09]

Hospital told woman: "[U]nless your brother brings in cash, he is not going to get the procedure without insurance." Attorney Peggy Raddatz also testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee and stated that her brother Otto was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and, after several rounds of chemotherapy, was scheduled for a stem cell transplant. In the midst of the preparation for this procedure, his insurance company canceled his insurance. Raddatz testified that when she called the hospital to see if she could still schedule the procedure for her brother, she was told: "[U]nless your brother brings in cash, he is not going to get the procedure without insurance." [Energy and Commerce Committee testimony, 6/16/09]

Hannity previously misused story of Briton supergluing his tooth as a "story of universal health care gone awry"

Hannity: "The Democrats have their way, get your superglue ready." On the July 8 edition of his Fox News show, describing what he called "[a]nother story of universal health care gone awry," Hannity stated that "a 55-year-old man in the U.K. ... ran into trouble when he couldn't find a dentist OKed by the government. So he superglued his tooth together for a period of three years." Hannity concluded: "The Democrats have their way, get your superglue ready." However, according to media reports, a woman in the United States has also glued in her teeth because of the costs of dental care. An ABCNews.com article also reported that low-income people are resorting to pulling their own teeth.

Transcript

From the October 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: You want -- you want the government option?

KIRSTEN POWERS (Fox News political analyst): I agree with that. I mean, I don't think the public option is a far-left thing. You know, people try to portray it that way. I think it's a mainstream -- most Democrats support the public option. I agree that it's the way to contain costs -- it's, in fact, the only way to contain costs. And all of the things --

HANNITY: The American people don't want it.

POWERS: That's not --

HANNITY: The American people don't want it --

POWERS: There is a New York Times poll --

HANNITY: -- and Congress has a 21 percent --

POWERS: There's a New York Times poll that showed that the majority of Americans did want it. But at the end of the day all the things --

HANNITY: Wait, is that the poll that polled two-to-one Democrats over Republicans? That poll?

POWERS: All of the things -- always attacking the poll.

HANNITY: I'm sorry, I --

POWERS: But all of the things that you mentioned, Sean -- I agree with Judith -- are fine. There's nothing wrong with them. But they're not -- even if you added them altogether, they would barely even touch the problem.

HANNITY: See, here's the problem. Everywhere socialized medicine has been tried, it's failed.

POWERS: It's not socialized medicine.

HANNITY: It ends up in rationing. It ends up bankrupting the country. You know, look at Great Britain recently. Women with breast cancer, they were denied drugs by who? The government rationing body.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (October 08, 2009 9:58 am ET)
      2  
      Mr. Hannity, you've called it the 'government' option, rather than a public option. So, we know that you're a right-wing lapdog, and an avid follower of Frank Luntz, who wrote that little memo detailing how to talk about a public option in the most negative way possible in an attempt to reframe the debate.

      The main component of your argument, because we can toss out the 'socialism' label as merely inflammatory, is the fear of rationing. So, you are trying to scare people away from a public option by making them afraid of possible (though not likely) outcomes, such as rationing. Two thoughts on this:

      1) You are aware, or should be, that the insurance industry is currently rationing care, every single day. They meet to decided who should and should not get care based on projected earnings and profit and loss. This is already happening, and Americans are dying by the thousands because of it.

      2) By using fear, or perhaps I should say terror, to make your point, you do realize that you are a terrorist, right? That you are terrorizing the American people in order to accomplish a political end?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jcamp (October 09, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
           
        The frustrating part is, Hannity has had all of this explained to him again and again, and still he persists with his line of BS, with the rationing, government option, etc, etc, etc.

        Fox seems to have a list of talking points their "pundits" must follow. It makes you wonder what they really think. Beck is nuts, but Hannity is intelligent enough to know better. Even O'Reilly shows a trace of humanity once in a while.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (October 08, 2009 10:23 am ET)
      5  
      You know, I have a dear friend who lives in London. She is American, but she has worked in London for many years. She LOVES her government health care and has never had any problems with it whatsoever. She chose her own physician, she doesn't have to wait for treatment and she receives good care. When her mother, who lived in LA was diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer a few years ago, she witnessed the abominable health care system of the U.S. Her mother had delays in care and actual lack of care due to insurance company denials. She stated repeatedly that, if her mother had not been so sick, she would have bundled her up and taken her to London to live with her so that she would get care. Her mom died before she could do so.

      In addition, I have a cousin who has a heart condition and is unable to obtain health insurance. She and her husband have taken jobs in Canada so that she and he can establish residency and receive health care there. Canada is a very long way from Texas, but they were going to go bankrupt trying to pay for health care in their own country. That's DISGUSTING.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (October 08, 2009 10:51 am ET)
      2  
      Years ago, my father tried to purchase insurance on our home, to cover the cost of the home in the event of either his or my mother's death. The insurance company denied my father because he was at risk of developing diabetes, when at the time, none of my paternal family had diabetes, and to this day, only one other relative has the condition.

      Luckily, my mother was able to get insurance coverage for the home.

      ---------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (October 08, 2009 11:36 am ET)
      2  
      This is the only way they can win, with lies.

      Right now the for-profit health insurance companies are the filters, and they deny for pre-existing conditions, which the government wouldn't do. They deny coverage for some medical procedures and drop patients entirely so that they can make a profit, which the government wouldn't do.

      The big bad bully is already doing what Hannity says we should fear, and the American public would be better served by someone who is not motivated by a profit motive than by someone who is.

      So, it's clear that what Hannity stands for is the profit motive of these health insurance companies!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (October 08, 2009 11:37 am ET)
      3  
      Anyone who doubts that there is a healthcare crisis in this country has their head in the sand.

      Everyone who claims to "love their insurance" has never really used it... it's this false comfort because we can see a GP when their child gets strep throat or if there's a minor accident involving a broken leg or severe bruise...

      but when it's serious and life threatening... when we need the coverage the most... that's when the system fails...

      The LA Times had a heart wrenching story today about a family who lost their 17 year daughter after Cigna refused to approve a liver transplant that the doctors at the UCLA Medical center recommended.

      Now that alone is bad, but the story continues about how she tried to sue Cigna, but current Federal law prevents us from suing our Health Insurance companies for damages due to ERISA (Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)... you can only sue for the cost of the treatment.

      To add insult to injury, she went to Cigna's headquarters in Philadephia to ask for an apology... while in the lobby Cigna employees, looking down into the atrium lobby from a balcony above, began heckling her, she said, with one of them giving her "the finger."

      Now since she can't sue Cigna for damages over the death of her daughter because of Federal Law (upheld by the Supreme Court), she is suing over the incident in the lobby.

      How sad and awful our state of affairs has become.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by atheist (October 08, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
        2  
        I have a hard time seeing a doctor for regular care ! I have a Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance plan through my employer. I have to make appointments months in advance. If I have an urgent situation, I will likely be forced to wait for hours in a waiting room, no matter how sick I am. I waited 6 hours in a waiting room this Spring when I developed conjunctivitis when recovering from the flu, it was torture to sit in that waiting room for hours. I almost never see a doctor because it's such a freaking pain in the rear to do so. What am I paying for? In general I'm a healthy person, I have no chronic conditions. I think I would rather just have catastrophic insurance and pay for my regular care myself.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by atheist (October 08, 2009 6:04 pm ET)
             
          BUT I want to add that my desired option, to pay my own way for my regular care and just have catastrophic insurance, cannot be done with the new plan. I will be penalized if I don't buy insurance. I really resent that. I'm all for everyone having decent health care, but I don't want to be penalized because I don't want to participate in a plan that doesn't work for me.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (October 08, 2009 11:43 am ET)
      1  
      One needs to keep it simple for folks like Hannity.

      45 million people without insurance in its self, is rationing, you bonehead.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by XerxesVargas (October 08, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
      4  
      Hello, I'm from the UK.

      Just as well we have the NHS because the lies that shower on Fox News keep telling about it makes me sick.

      Anyhow, can I just clear one thing about this denial of breast cancer drug issue. Firstly, some women were denied a specific drug, but it is important to remember that they were treated. On the issue of the drug the reason they were denied it wasn't because it was very expensive (which is was) but because it was not licensed here in the UK as a medicine. So as a result it was untested, again here in the UK, and the benefits were unclear. The fuss was made by the women (fair enough) with the help of the drug company (quelle surprise). The women were likely to die of their cancer, as it was advanced, and were clutching at any straws they could, again fair enough. The drug company, however, were the one dangling the straws (to extend the metaphor to breaking point).

      So lets be clear here. Some women were denied a drug which was not licensed here at the time and which costs nearly £30k. They were, however, treated for their cancer as everybody else in the country is. Unfortunately, for them, it was not successful. But I don't think even the great US insurance system can claim 100% survival rate.

      Its none of my business what you guys over there do. However, I can tell you that I have had Chrones disease for the last 18 years and the NHS has saved my life twice (literally) and the treatment I continue to get allows me to work and pay my taxes. The NHS is the single most loved institution in the UK and surely that says all you need to know?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 08, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
        2  
        Thanks for clearing up the nonsense from Faux News. Somehow I knew they weren't being entirely forthcoming with all the details of the issue.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 08, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
        2  
        People are denied medications in this country for the exact same reason as that cited in your breast cancer story.

        My friend who lives in London loves her NHS care . . . she's experienced both American and English health care. Guess which one she prefers?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (October 08, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
          2  
          Well, if the NHS is so great, why is Britain only 16th in terms of health care among advanced nations, while we're, uh, 19th.

          Never mind.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by XerxesVargas (October 08, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
               
            I never said it was flawless now did I? I didn't make any comparisons with any other country.

            What I can say though is that we may only be 3 places above you, but we spend just under half the amount, in terms of GDP, than you do in the USA. That's half. 50%.

            Please don't get the idea that I'm saying that the NHS is some type of medical nirvana. Its not. It has its problems. However, one of them is not making people choose between a limb or their house. For me its not a matter of economics but morality. Its about asking yourself what type of country you want to live in. I want to live in one which values people over money.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by jflash97 (October 08, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
        1  
        Well, there are many over here that can't let the facts get in the way of a good talking point...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jflash97 (October 08, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
      1  
      I'm really getting exhausted with factually-challenged pundits (and politicians) speaking for "The American People". "The American People" don't want this, "The American People" don't want that...as if "The American People" was a single entity. Apparently, "The American People" can't even agree on something that should seemingly bring us all together like, say, the Olympics coming to America. So how is it that "The American People" can all agree that they don't want a "government option"?

      Speak for yourself, Mr. Hannity. And be genuine about it...speak about things that might actually impact you, since the millions of dollars you get paid to be a corporate puppet means you won't ever have to worry about rationed health care.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Conchobhar (October 08, 2009 1:06 pm ET)
      3  
      KO can be hard to take for some (including me, at times, hated him as a sports guy), especially for an hour-long monologue, but this is both spot on and moving. Of course, those who should see it, won't.

      For those who'd prefer just the transcript:
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steelers84 (October 08, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
      3  
      If socialized medicine has failed everywhere it's been tried, why do none of those nations reject it and use our great system?

      The fact is our system is the one that is a failure, which is why the rest of the world has rejected it.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.