About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Still rooting against America: Right-wing media use Nobel Prize announcement as excuse to attack Obama

October 09, 2009 1:26 pm ET — 22 Comments

Numerous conservative media figures have seized on the Nobel Committee's decision to award President Obama the Nobel Peace Prize as an excuse to attack Obama or his policies. Media conservatives previously rooted against Chicago's bid to host the 2016 Olympic Games, similarly using the bid as an excuse to attack Obama, and celebrated when the games were awarded to Rio de Janeiro.

Any excuse: Conservative media attack Obama for being given Nobel Prize

Limbaugh: Nobel Committee awarded Obama to promote concept of "weakened, neutered U.S." The Politico reported that, in an email, Rush Limbaugh said the award was a "greater embarrassment" than Chicago's failed Olympic bid. Limbaugh reportedly added, "They love a weakened, neutered U.S, and this is their way of promoting that concept. I think God has a great sense of humor, too." [Politico, 10/9/09]

Malkin: "The World Apology Tour yields dividends." Michelle Malkin wrote on her blog, "From community organizer to Illinois state senator (present!) to U.S. Senator for 143 days before moving into the White House...and now, the recipient of a Nobel Peace Prize -- not for anything he's actually done, but for the symbolism of what he might possibly accomplish sometime way off in the future." She added, "The World Apology Tour yields dividends." [MichelleMalkin.com, 10/9/09]

Gateway Pundit: Obama awarded prize after he "bankrupted the US economy and destroyed the morale of our military." Gateway Pundit asserted that Obama "turned his back on the Iranian freedom protesters ... He's allowed the Taliban killers back into the government ... He's sided with Marxists Castro, Chavez, Morales and Ortega ... Obama's bankrupted the US economy and destroyed the morale of our military. No wonder he was awarded the Nobel." [Gateway Pundit, 10/9/09]

RedState's Erickson: "I did not realize the Nobel Peace Prize had an affirmative action quota." Erick Erickson wrote, "I did not realize the Nobel Peace Prize had an affirmative action quota for it, but that is the only thing I can think of for this news. There is no way Barack Obama earned it in the nominations period." [RedState, 10/9/09]

Mike Gallagher: "I guess his worldwide apology tour has worked." Appearing on Fox & Friends, radio host Mike Gallagher stated, "The man hasn't completed a full year yet. Even Saturday Night Live is spoofing how little this man has accomplished. ... I mean, it must be good to be the king. I guess his worldwide apology tour has worked. Now the world community has said, 'OK, well we'll award you with something.' This is nonsensical, and it's great political fodder for the loyal opposition to say, once again, this Oprah president gets a nondeserved award for doing little or next to nothing." [Fox News' Fox & Friends, 10/9/09]

Kilmeade wonders if this "[has] anything to do with delay of the deployment of 40,000 troops." Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade stated: "I'm looking at the charter, and we're just getting this now, but this guy Alfred Nobel stipulated the Peace Prize should go to the person who will have done the most or the best work of the fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses. I'm wondering, does that have anything to do with the delay of the deployment of 40,000 troops in Afghanistan, because that was his big postulization [sic] over the last week or so. Should I put more troops in?" [Fox & Friends, 10/9/09]

NRO's Levin: Prize will awaken public's "intolerance for pompous arrogance." Yuval Levin wrote on National Review Online's The Corner blog that the prize "risk[s] awakening with a vengeance the notorious good sense of the American public, and its democratic intolerance for pompous arrogance and nonsense." Stating that the award "challenges Obama and his circle to assure the country that they are not delusional," Levin asserted that "Obama himself and his circle" were among those that believed in his "cult of personality" and that "the world would change its attitude about America simply because he was there." [National Review Online, 10/9/09]

Hot Air's Morrissey: "Perhaps they should change the award's name to the Neville rather than the Nobel." Ed Morrissey wrote, "What diplomatic efforts 'so far'? He gave a speech in Cairo and ... and ... and ... gave a few in Europe, too." He added, "Obama did make a big show of appeasing Iran during its election crisis. Perhaps they should change the award's name to the Neville rather than the Nobel." [Hot Air, 10/9/09]

Conservative media previously rooted against Chicago's Olympic bid

Brzezinski notes similarity between conservatives attacking Obama over Olympics and criticizing Nobel Peace Prize. On MSNBC's Morning Joe, after Joe Scarborough stated that "Marisa Tomei did more to win the Academy Award in My Cousin Vinny ... than Barack Obama has done to win a Nobel Peace Prize," Mika Brzezinski stated, "This is hypocritical to criticize the people who said 'ha, ha, ha' about Chicago, and now you're saying it's not right that the president won the Nobel Peace Prize." Scarborough previously wrote of opposition to Chicago's bid that "the fact many right-wing figures opposed the President's mission shows just how narrow-minded partisanship makes us all."

Fox News attack machine smeared Chicago as a violent city unsuitable for Olympics. Prior to the IOC's decision, conservative media -- led by Fox News -- attacked Obama's support of Chicago's Olympic bid: smearing the city as unfit to host the Olympics, often by citing individual instances of violence. For example, Sean Hannity, after citing a recent murder and an assault, asked whether Chicago is "a city where we want the Olympics," and Glenn Beck said, "Chicago is good at ... organized Mafi -- oops, did I say that out loud?"

Beck led conservative media in raising specter of Chicago cronyism to attack Obama's bid for Olympics. Conservative media suggested or claimed that Obama was advocating for Chicago to host the Olympics in order to return political favors to Chicago Mayor Richard Daley or forward the financial interests of other "Chicago pals." For instance, Beck advanced baseless speculation that Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett "may personally benefit" from the Olympics, and Malkin wrote that Daley "cronies" in Obama's circle are "returning the favor for their hometown boss" by pushing for the Chicago Olympics.

Fox News used Olympic bid to attack Obama. Fox News hosts, contributors, and guests used Obama's promotion of Chicago's Olympic bid as an excuse to attack him. Attacks on Obama's efforts included Hannity saying that "it sounds" like Obama "is more concerned about bringing the Olympics to Chicago than winning the war in Afghanistan"; Brent Bozell claiming Obama's trip to Copenhagen to promote the Chicago bid "is evidence that this man just cannot stay away from the klieg lights"; and Bret Baier invoking the "carbon footprint" of Obama's trip to Copenhagen to smear the president.

Conservative media celebrated Chicago's elimination, bashed Obama. Numerous media conservatives celebrated the IOC's decision to award the 2016 Olympics to Rio de Janeiro rather than Chicago. For instance, Beck crowed that the IOC's decision was "so sweet," and Limbaugh stated, "I don't deny it. I'm happy," while Bill Kristol stated that "you couldn't help but be amused by it."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (October 09, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
      10  
      Your modern GOP: Got hate?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lewislaw7153 (October 09, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
      6  
      F&F sure don't have to work very hard to achieve stoooopid . .

      The Nobel Prize Committee NOMINATED Mr. Obama two weeks after he was sworn in as POTUS but they just voted several weeks ago!!

      Maybe F&F will use the 'intanets' before making uninformed statements to their viewers. One can only hope . .
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (October 09, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
      8  
      So the world's opinion doesn't matter, except when it does.

      If we had elected a water cooler president, the water cooler would have won the peace prize. It would have been as big of a glaring contrast from the previous president.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HRN (October 09, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
      11  
      Sh*t...the man could come up with a cure for cancer and these buffoons would howl.
      Does anyone who DOESN'T breathe through their mouth still pay attention to these "pundits"?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave (October 09, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
        1 21
        If he came up with the cure for cancer, I'd be all for it. What has this Bozo done to merit this? And keep in mind, he's now in the company of Gore, Carter, and Arafat. Congrats!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by JoeSixpack (October 09, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
          12  
          I really don't see what the big deal is. Obama himself has said that he was surprised by it, and that he doesn't think he deserves it, and he has already pledged to give all the money to charity. It's not like he was out there lobbying for this.

          I think I'm starting to understand why so many wingnuts keep referring to him as the messiah - they're always looking for an excuse to crucify him.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Preston (October 09, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
            7  
            I think I'm starting to understand why so many wingnuts keep referring to him as the messiah - they're always looking for an excuse to crucify him.


            Spot-on!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Talisman (October 09, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
             
          I remember the whole "Rush for Peace" movement. He didn't win, but he sure had it in for Gore for winning and repeatedly pointed out that the Nobel Peace Prize is a big joke. What if he did win, could anybody honestly say that he did something good for this planet?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (October 09, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
          8  
          And keep in mind, he's now in the company of Gore, Carter, and Arafat. Congrats!!

          I don't understand your anger that president Obama is now in the same category with these men?

          He has brought in a whole new era of bi-lateral diplomacy, where everyone is involved in talks.

          Unlike the Bush/Cheney regime who went out of their way to slap the face of the rest of Earth, putting scumbags like Bolton in as UN Ambassador or Gonzales as AG or Rumsfeld as Sec Def...

          Whether you know it or like it or not... this country is in much better shape with Obama as president than Grampy and Caribu in charge!

          American foreign policy is finally something the world can envy again.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Lynnie (October 10, 2009 9:41 pm ET)
             
          Bozo?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by rms (October 12, 2009 10:38 am ET)
          2  
          "he's now in the company of Gore, Carter, and Arafat. Congrats!!"

          According to the rules of your silly game, you, Malkin, Limbaugh, et al are in the company of Iran and the Taliban (Limbaugh: "Folks, do you realize something has happened here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran"). Congrats to you!!!!!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 12, 2009 11:23 am ET)
          2  
          If he came up with the cure for cancer, I'd be all for it.

          Excuse me, dave, but great scientific developments are not a prerequisite for winning the peace prize.

          My goodness, we really need brighter trolls around here.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by seaniccus (October 09, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
      1 13
      Actually, for once this is something worth an outcry - the nomination came when he had only two weeks in office - meaning that the nomination was based off his campaign, not his presidency.

      It's too early for this prize, it just further shows what a popularity contest Nobel has become. moreover, it could be bad for his presidency - it sets forth expectations - and imagine if he fails to meet them? What if things go poorly in Afghanistan - what if in the next four years, a new war breaks out?

      Poor decisions here, all around.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (October 10, 2009 12:48 am ET)
        9  
        That's right, the nomination wasn't based upon his presidency. It was based off his vision and his intelligence and his dedication to bipartisanship and diplomacy. It was based upon his esteem for others and his attitude that, although the USA is the greatest nation in the world, it is not perfect and it should not demand fealty and subservience from everyone else!

        Regardless of who things turn out, his goals and his vision will still be admirable.

        And the vote came in September, so the fact that his nomination came only two weeks after the inauguration doesn't mean much at all.

        And thanks, but no thanks - we don't need no more concern trolls around here.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (October 10, 2009 3:54 am ET)
        5  
        seaniccus

        I'll be sure to never invite you over for X-Mas cheer... you'd suck all the life out the party with a Debbie Downer attitude like that!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (October 09, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
      8  
      Funny proud of your country failing and upset about your President winning. This leads one to think the right hates America. This is the group that says if you are not with us you are unAmerican.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by the7_thson (October 10, 2009 8:04 am ET)
      10  
      I think President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize just for taking the White House from the republicans.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marge (October 10, 2009 10:54 am ET)
         
      The State Department said it all.....The would rather the throw accolades at Obama instead of shoes....I thought that very very appropriate. Don't you all..
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cgk1964 (October 10, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
         
      Yada, yada, yada. But what did Obama DO to win the prize?

      According to the official Nobel Prize website, President Obama was singled out for the Nobel Peace Prize "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples".

      Based on his efforts.

      Efforts are impressive when they yeild results.

      Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize for his EFFORTS is like every member of the Bad News Bears getting trophies for participation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (October 12, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
      1  
      I actually heard a few seconds of Sean Hannity's radio pukefest the other day (about as much as I can tolerate), and he seemed to be saying that the biggest problem he had with President Obama being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize was that they never awarded it to Ronald Reagan. For what? Invading Grenada????
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.