About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh's "colorblind" history of racially charged comments

October 13, 2009 5:18 pm ET — 239 Comments

On October 12, Rush Limbaugh responded to accusations that he is "insensitive" and has a "blind spot" about race by claiming that he is "colorblind," "treat[s] everybody equally" and that he "doesn't see [President Obama] as black," but rather as "president of the United States." In fact, Limbaugh has an extensive history of making racially charged remarks about minorities and routinely race-baits while criticizing Obama and his policies, such as saying that Obama is a "reverse racist" and that his economic policies amount to "reparations."

Limbaugh claims he is "colorblind" and "treat[s] every equally"

From the October 12 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: I've had people say to me, well, I think you've got a blind spot. You don't know what it's like to have a heritage that black people [unintelligible] -- oh, I most certainly do not have a blind spot, and I most certainly do understand it. I understand that all human beings have obstacles. We all have to overcome them. There's no better place to overcome those obstacles than the United States of America. The freest country, the freest people on Earth. And what really saddens me and disappoints me to this day is that there are people who are not inspired and taught about how great they can be because they are Americans.

Frankly, the biggest problem I face in the current climate of political correctness is that I'm colorblind about it. I don't say politically correct things about it. For example, in the Today show interview, Jamie Gangel: "Weren't you moved by the election of the first black president?" Yeah, I was. Great historical fact, but I got over it pretty quickly, because I don't see him as black. I see him as president of the United States, and I'm more concerned about his policies.

I love this country. I want everyone in this country to succeed. I want everyone in this country to pursue happiness. I want everyone to benefit as an American, as I have. I stand in no one's way. I am not the one putting obstacles in people's way. I'm the one trying to sweep them away, and in so doing, I don't speak politically correct language, and as such, I'm accused of being insensitive. I guess my problem is I treat people as adults. I treat them as informed, I treat them as educated, and I treat them as equals. I don't condescend to people, and I don't run around feeling sorry for people, because that doesn't help them. After you feel sorry for somebody, then what do you do?

It's all up to us to make the most of the one life we are blessed to be given by God. And I cringe when I see so many lives not reaching anywhere near their potential, because others capitalize on their failure to do so. And that happens not just with racial issues; it happens with all minorities. We have assumed that we're an unjust and unfair country. That all of the minorities, for whatever reason they are minorities, are victims of an unfair, unjust, immoral America.

And there are white people that buy into that stuff, too, because they don't want to run around feeling guilty, and they don't want to run around people thinking that they are racist. It's all political correctness that has led people to thinking this. And so, when I, for example, say, I think the media has little interest in a black quarterback doing well, I mean it. Most of the sports media is politically correct liberals.

And that kind of surface stuff matters to them. I'm interested in people's hearts and their souls, because that's what animates us as human beings. Not our skin color. I'm colorblind. I have reached the point where everybody professes we need to go. I treat everybody equally. Nobody is -- in the political arena -- I don't care. Male, female, black, white, gay, straight, bisexual. If you are opposed to the things I think are great for the country, I'm going to say so. I'm going to criticize you. Not because of whatever it is distinguishes you from me on a surface basis, but because of ideas. I'm just a lone guy here, in the arena of ideas, sharing mine. [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 10/12/09]

Limbaugh has made numerous racially charged remarks about Obama

  • "We are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black." After Obama's inauguration, Limbaugh said during an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News that "[r]acism in this country is the exclusive province of the left. We're witnessing racism all this week that led up to the inauguration. We're being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles. Bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father was black, because this is the first black president. We've got to accept this. The racism that everybody thinks exists on our side of the aisle has been on full display throughout their primary campaign. So I think they've done a great job, the media has, of covering up his deficiencies."

  • "I do believe" Obama is an "angry black guy." Responding to accusations that he had called Obama "an angry black man," Limbaugh said on July 27 "they're finally hearing me -- he's an angry black guy. I do believe that about the president. I do believe he's angry; I think his wife is angry. All liberals are enraged all the time anyways. They're always mad." Previously, Limbaugh had said that Obama is "one angry guy."

  • "[I]n Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering." On September 15, Limbaugh said: "It's Obama's America, is it not? Obama's America, white kids getting beat up on school buses now. I mean, you put your kids on a school bus, you expect -- you expect safety. But in Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering, 'Yay, right on, right on, right on, right on.' And of course everybody says, 'Oh, the white kid deserved it. He was born a racist, he's white.' Newsweek magazine told us this. We know that white students are destroying civility on buses. White students destroying civility in classrooms all over America. White congressmen destroying civility in the House of Representatives. We can redistribute students while we redistribute their parents' wealth. I mean, we can just redistribute everything. Just return the white students to their rightful place, their own bus, with bars on the windows and armed guards. They're racist. They get what they deserve. Newsweek magazine told us this -- post-racial America. I mean, I wonder if Obama's going to come to the defense of the assailants the way he did his friend Skip Gates up there at Harvard."

  • "Obama's entire economic program is reparations." On June 22, Limbaugh said, "What they don't know is that Obama's entire economic program is reparations. If I were [Al] Sharpton, if I'd been guest-hosting Sharpton's show, and I got a call like that, somebody complaining, I'd say, 'No, hey, hey, hey. Shh, shh. Let me tell you the truth here. Everything in the stimulus plan, every plan he's got is reparations. He gonna take from the rich, he's gonna take from the -- he's gonna give it to you. It just can't happen overnight. Be patient.' That's what's -- redistribution of wealth, reparations, returning the nation's wealth to its rightful owners, whatever you want to call it, it's reparations."

  • Obama is "more African in his roots than he is American" and is "behaving like an African colonial despot." After reading extensively from an American Thinker column smearing Obama, Limbaugh said on June 26 that Obama is "more African in his roots than he is American" and is "behaving like an African colonial despot."

  • Obama is "Halfrican-American." On January 24, 2007, Limbaugh referred to Obama and actress Halle Berry as "Halfrican-American[s]," stating that "Barack Obama has picked up another endorsement: Halfrican-American actress Halle Berry." Limbaugh then said: " 'As a Halfrican-American, I am honored to have Ms. Berry's support, as well as the support of other Halfrican Americans,' Obama said." Limbaugh then conceded that Obama "didn't say it."

  • "Obama has disowned his white half ... he's decided he's got to go all in on the black side." On March 21, 2008, Limbaugh said of Obama's handling of the controversy surrounding remarks by Rev. Jeremiah Wright: "It is clear that Senator Obama has disowned his white half, that he's decided he's got to go all in on the black side." Limbaugh had earlier said: "[Y]ou know, opening these race wounds like this, taking us back 30, 40 years, making it look like no progress has been made -- what Barack Obama has done -- I'm going to say something here that might offend -- or not offend -- but might make some uncomfortable. But it is clear to me that there has been a major transformation in Senator Obama."

  • Sotomayor "a reverse racist" appointed by Obama, "the greatest living example of a reverse racist." On May 26, Limbaugh said then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is a "reverse racist" and that liberals are wrong to assert that "minorities cannot be racists" because Obama is the "greatest living example of a reverse racist and now he's appointed one." On his May 29 show, Limbaugh compared Sotomayor's nomination to nominating David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan member, and said the way to "get promoted in the Barack Obama administration" is "by hating white people."

  • Obama "wants us to have the same health care and plan that he had in Kenya" and "wants to be the black FDR." On August 24, Limbaugh said he "finally figured out why it is Obama's pushing so hard on this health care bill." He asserted: "He just wants us to have the same health care and plan that he had in Kenya. And look, you know, economic anxiety is necessary if you want to become the next black FDR, which is -- well, the black FDR. That's what he wants. He wants to be the black FDR, the next FDR, and FDR fed off of economic anxiety."
  • Latching onto LA Times op-ed, Limbaugh sings "Barack, The Magic Negro." On March 19, 2007, Limbaugh highlighted a Los Angeles Times op-ed that described Obama as "running for an equally important unelected office, in the province of the popular imagination -- the 'Magic Negro' " -- a term used by critics of pop culture to describe certain benevolent African-American characters. Limbaugh stated: "The term 'Magic Negro' has been thrown into the political presidential race in the mix for 2008. And the term 'Magic Negro,' as applied to Barack Obama has been done by an LA Times columnist, David Ehrenstein." Limbaugh later asserted: "I'm going to keep referring to him as that, because I want to make a bet that by the end of this week I will own that term," adding, "If I refer to Obama the rest of the day as the 'Magic Negro,' there will be a number of people in the drive-by media and on left-wing blogs who will credit me for coming up with it and ignore the LA Times did it, simply because they can't be critical of the LA Times, but they can, obviously, be critical of talk radio." Limbaugh continued to refer to Obama as the "Magic Negro" throughout the broadcast -- 27 times, to be exact -- and at one point sang "Barack, the Magic Negro" to the tune of "Puff, the Magic Dragon." Limbaugh defended his use of the song, stating, "Well, that's what we always do here. We do parodies and satires on the idiocy and phoniness of the left."

  • "God does not have a birth certificate. Neither does Obama"; Obama "has yet to prove he's a citizen." Limbaugh has also advanced the theory that Obama was not born in the United States, saying that "God does not have a birth certificate. Neither does Obama" and that Obama "has yet to have to prove he's a citizen. All he'd have to do is show a birth certificate."
  • Limbaugh on Gates controversy: "Here you have a black president trying to destroy a white policeman." On July 24, Limbaugh said Obama "all of a sudden, this guy that [moderates] elected, who they thought was all of these wonderful, perfect things, is now behaving as a community organizer and is fanning the flames of race, and is calling the police stupid. And I guarantee you those people -- we've all been waiting to ask the question, when are the Obama voters going to wake up? Well, this incident might be -- I don't know yet, a little early to say -- this incident might be the wake-up call for some of these moderates. ... You know that there were a lot of people that voted for Obama out of pure guilt. Hoping that that -- the election, his election would just wipe the slate clean, at least make them feel better about it. And this just destroys that. Here you have a black president trying to destroy a white policeman when he doesn't know the facts of the case." Limbaugh also said on July 23 that white policemen are "under assault" "from the East Room of the White House."

  • Limbaugh suggests Obama would not have acted on Somali pirates if he'd known they were "actually young, black Muslim teenagers." On April 14, Limbaugh suggested the "correct" way to look at a situation in which Obama sent the military to retrieve American hostages from Somali pirates was that "if only President Obama had known that the three Somali community organizers were actually young, black Muslim teenagers, I'm sure he wouldn't have given the order to shoot."
  • Limbaugh suggests Democrats, media believe "you can't criticize the little black man-child." Referring to GOP ads comparing Obama to Britney Spears during the presidential campaign, on August 20, 2008, Limbaugh said: "It's -- you know, it's just -- it's just we can't hit the girl. I don't care how far feminism's saying, you can't hit the girl, and you can't -- you can't criticize the little black man-child. You just can't do it, 'cause it's just not right, It's not fair. He's such a victim." The previous day, Limbaugh had said that "it is striking how unqualified Obama is and, and how this whole thing came about with, within the Democrat Party. I think it really goes back to the fact that nobody had the guts to stand up and say no to a black guy." Limbaugh went on to say, "I think this is a classic illustration here where affirmative action has reared its ugly head against them."

Limbaugh has an extensive history of making racially charged comments

  • "The government's been taking care of [young blacks] their whole lives." On February 1, 2007, Limbaugh responded to a Reuters report about a University of Chicago study that found that "a majority of young blacks feel alienated from today's government" by asserting, "Why would that be? The government's been taking care of them their whole lives."
  • "The days of [minorities] not having any power are over, and they are angry." On June 4, Limbaugh said, "This has been the argument the Reverend Jackson has proffered throughout my life -- that it's impossible for minorities to be racist because they don't have any power. Well, president of the United States. We're talking now about a Supreme Court justice. The days of them not having any power are over, and they are angry. And they want to use their power as a means of retribution. That's what Obama's about, gang. He's angry; he's going to cut this country down to size. He's going to make it pay for all the multicultural mistakes that it has made -- its mistreatment of minorities. I know exactly what's going on here."

  • "[M]inorities never do anything for which they have to apologize." On April 12, 2007, Limbaugh criticized Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson for refusing to apologize to three former members of the Duke University men's lacrosse team who were accused of rape in March 2006 -- all charges were dropped on April 11, 2007 -- and asserted that "minorities never do anything for which they have to apologize." Presumably referring to the decision by CBS Radio and MSNBC to stop airing Imus in the Morning following controversial comments by host Don Imus, Limbaugh stated: "Everybody's demanding that everybody apologize in this country for simply breathing. It's getting to the point some people are not allowed to breathe or exhale, or make syllables." Limbaugh went on to complain about the protests Sharpton and Jackson led condemning Imus' remarks, saying: "They're members of the minority. Don't ever forget that this is the case. Minorities, victims, members of groups, are allowed to do anything to address their grievances and to get noticed, because ... they're so oppressed."
  • Limbaugh: "The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well." In 2003, Limbaugh resigned from his job as an ESPN commentator after saying that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb hasn't "been that good from the get-go" and "got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve," because "[t]he media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well." After the Eagles reached Super Bowl XXXIX in 2005, Limbaugh returned to making racial comments about McNabb, saying, "There's no question McNabb has improved and I'm happy to see it," but that "when the defense ... was propping the Eagles up," the media "were still giving McNabb credit -- because there's this social hope."

  • Limbaugh says "NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips." On January 19, 2007, Limbaugh stated: "Look it, let me put it to you this way. The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There I said it."

  • Limbaugh declares basketball "the favorite sport of gangs." Discussing the government's attempts to curb violence, Limbaugh told a caller on October 7: "It's not reasonable that you should understand the insanity that local and state and federal bureaucracies are doing. It's perfectly normal and understandable that none of what they do would make sense to you. My question -- OK, a 1 cent sales tax to fight gang violence. What do you spend the money on to fight gang violence? Afterschool program -- don't we already have afterschool programs? Don't we already have -- what do you call it, extracurricular events? Midnight basketball -- I mean, we've done it all. We've taken the favorite sport of gangs, and we put it at midnight to get them on the basketball court. We had 100,000 new cops with Clinton -- we've done it all. And the problem still is out of control. Liberalism doesn't work."
  • Limbaugh invented "racial component" to Hackett's decision to withdraw from Ohio primary race. During the 2006 Democratic primaries, Limbaugh invented a racial element to explain Iraq war veteran Paul Hackett's departure from the Ohio Democratic Senate primary race against then-Rep. Sherrod Brown, asserting, "And don't forget, Sherrod Brown is black. There's a racial component here, too." In fact, Brown is white -- a point on which Limbaugh was corrected later in the program.
  • Limbaugh on Survivor series: "African-American tribe" worst swimmers, Hispanics "will do things other people won't do." On August 23, 2006, Limbaugh suggested that the competition in a season of CBS' Survivor, in which contestants were reportedly divided into competing "tribes" by ethnicity, "is not going to be fair if there's a lot of water events." In support of this assertion, he cited a March 2, 2006, HealthDay article reporting that "young blacks -- especially males -- are much more likely to drown in pools than whites." He later added that Hispanics have "probably shown the most survival tactics," that they "have shown a remarkable ability to cross borders," and that they can "do it without water for a long time, they don't get apprehended, and they will do things other people won't do." On his September 29, 2006, show, Limbaugh claimed "[t]here can only be one reason" Survivor scrapped "segregated" competition after two episodes -- "the white tribe had to be winning."
  • Limbaugh suggested Colin Powell only supported Obama because of race. After Limbaugh asserted that Colin Powell should leave the Republican Party because of his support for Obama, Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) said on MSNBC's Morning Joe that "[i]t's not up to Rush Limbaugh to decide who ought to be in the Republican Party." Limbaugh responded on his May 18 show that all Democrats "had to do was nominate an African-American and [they've] got Colin Powell."
  • Limbaugh: Gates is an "angry racist." On July 27, Limbaugh said Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates is an "angry racist."
  • Limbaugh called illegal immigrants an "invasive species." Referring to an April 1, 2005, federal court ruling that prohibited shipping boats from dumping of ballast water containing "invasive species," including some types of mollusks, into U.S. waters, Limbaugh described illegal immigrants as an "invasive species" that U.S. courts willingly permit to enter the country.
  • Limbaugh repeatedly calls Native Americans "Injuns." Media Matters for America documented at least four separate instances of Limbaugh using this slur on his program.
  • Limbaugh says Democrats' interest in Darfur is securing black "voting bloc." On August 21, 2007, Limbaugh claimed that Democrats "want to get us out of Iraq, but they can't wait to get us into Darfur." He continued: "There are two reasons. What color is the skin of the people in Darfur? It's black. And who do the Democrats really need to keep voting for them? If they lose a significant percentage of this voting bloc, they're in trouble." A caller responded, "The black population," to which Limbaugh said, "Right."
  • Limbaugh says that if "feminazis" had remembered to oppose "affirmative action for black guys ... they wouldn't face the situation they face today." On May 21, 2008, Limbaugh said that "one of the objectives of the feminazis over the last 20, 25 years has been to dominate the public education system so as to remove the competitive nature of boys. You know, there's a crisis of young man-boy education in the schools. And they did this on purpose, to eliminate male competition in the work force. This is part of feminazi grand plan." Limbaugh then said, "They forgot affirmative action for black guys. And because of that, every bit of their plan has gone up in smoke now, because they -- if -- they had to come out in favor of affirmative action for black guys, and that's -- see, this is one of the things that really irritates the women. And there are women all over this country fit to be tied -- trust me on this. ... [L]iberals eventually are going to be devoured by their own policies. And it has happened here. Because Barack Obama is an affirmative action candidate." He concluded, "So, it's just -- they just forgot that one thing: affirmative action for black guys. And if they had remembered to oppose that, then they wouldn't face the situation they face today."

 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pilotshark (October 13, 2009 5:27 pm ET)
      10 4
      You have to wonder if fathead is wondering as well went some one will really call out his BS.
      I like him to say a few things that he has said in front of a audience or maybe a few people at a park you know some where real Americans hang out.
      Its easy to hide and coward behind a microphone knowing you do not have to face some one. hell i bet deep down inside rushbuttboil you are truly a COWARD.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by the Grey Path (October 13, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
        11 6
        Actually Rush has a point .. He's much more a religious, nationalistic, and political bigot than a racist.

        And ya gotta admit ... that's really saying something.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by The Lonewacko Blog (October 14, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
        5 12
        Actually, the cowards in this case are Media Matters; they're intellectual cowards in that they provide quotes without attempting to explain what they think are wrong with them. They should do so, so that others can then point out just how MMFA got things wrong. They're also taking some of the quotes above out of context, in that they aren't mentioning that some were part of a satire. Of course, MMFA has never been known for their abilities to actually understand someone's point so smear pieces like this aren't much of a surprise.

        I will, however, give MMFA credit for one thing. Unlike RachelMaddow and many other hacks, they haven't promoted this bogus Rush quote. MMFA does to a certain extent try to get their citations correct, even if their ability to analyze is almost non-existent.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleLeft (October 14, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
          7 6
          Actually, the cowards in this case are Media Matters; they're intellectual cowards in that they provide quotes without attempting to explain what they think are wrong with them.

          Anyone who has to ask that question IS a racist.

          People who are racist are last to recognize it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 14, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
            2 6
            man, ain't no shame in lonewacko's game. Wallow in it, get that stupid all over you. Explanation? You are out of your mind ! But just out of curiosity you care to explain Rush's comments?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by OhMy (October 14, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
            1 1
            While I see no question in the post, I will ask it more directly;
            Will all of you who know exactly what is a racist please give the rest of us a definition?

            I do not consider myself a racist, but I also know that I am a white male, so I must recognize race. Does that make me a racist?

            Simply stating that anyone who asks for clarification or asks for a rationale by which a statement is deemed racist does not actually prove racism.

            So please, give us the definition of a racist.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 9:10 am ET)
              2  
              Someone who believes that one race is superior to another.

              Please note that MMfA doesn't say "racist comments", they say "racially charged comments".
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jmariemo (October 15, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
                 
              rac⋅ism  /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
              Use racism in a Sentence
              See web results for racism
              See images of racism
              –noun 1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
              2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
              3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

              Mystery solved!
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Jeremy Danials (October 14, 2009 7:53 pm ET)
          7 5
          Quotes like these require NO explination. Racism is racism, pure and simple.

          Is there any explination necessary for Rush's quote, "NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips"? Or how about singing "Barack, The Magic Negro"? For God's sakes, I'm white, and that's offensive to me!

          Lesson 1 on not being a racist: Dont bring race into it! Rush does this continually, instead of focusing on the issues at hand, in order to distract from the fact that he knows nothing about what he speaks. Rush's opinions should come with a cape and a hood.

          Fighting Racism wherever I can,
          Byte Man
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ltw (October 15, 2009 4:57 am ET)
            1 5
            "Lesson 1 on not being a racist: Dont bring race into it!"

            Actually that's rule # 1 for cowardice, according to our Attorney General, and this whole exercise shows why: Rush is not afraid to talk about race, and he's being called a racist for his courage. The "crips & bloods" comment was at the end of a long monolog about outlandish NFL taunting behavior that sometimes escalates into violence off the field. He was talking about culture, and to the extent that's a racial issue, it shouldn't be tiptoed around (unless you're a conservative...?)

            "Barack the Magic Negro" is a parodic take on a black LA Times writer's column with a similar title, sung in the voice of professional bigot and con-man Al Sharpton. It's only offensive to those who approve of race hustlers like Sharpton, or those who are looking for an excuse to be offended.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:42 am ET)
              2 1
              He may not be afraid of talking about race but he whines like a baby when he is called a racist. He said very low standards for what constitutes a racist when he called Obama a racist. He exceeds those standards on a daily basis.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jmariemo (October 15, 2009 5:59 pm ET)
              2  
              Oh, you are totally correct.
              "The government's been taking care of [young blacks] their whole lives."-Rush Limbaugh
              It takes a lot of courage to correlate African Americans and welfare when referring to a study that discusses young black teenagers who feel alienated from the government. I am so glad Rush has the balls to give insightful commentary on a profound subject. No one else could have connected black people and welfare with such eloquence.

              He truly is ground-breaking and an asset to our media.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by trinity99 (October 15, 2009 11:29 am ET)
            1 1
            Thanks Byte Man for speaking the truth.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Jeremy Danials (October 15, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
              2 1
              Never fear me lying about anything.

              And remember, folks, racists are always the last ones to realize that they ARE racist.

              Fighting Limbaugh and his Ilk wherever I can,
              Byte Man
              Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:39 am ET)
          2  
          It's not a bogus quote, he said it on WABC's local show.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
          3 1
          Classic wacko. Wow. You attack MM for not analyzing them enough. Yet, you fail to explain any of them. In fact, you erect a strawman and beat on it. Well done. Pathetic, but well done. Apparently you also "never been known for their abilities to actually understand someone's point so smear pieces like this aren't much of a surprise".
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bvdon (October 14, 2009 6:57 pm ET)
        1 5
        MediaMatters is showing its bias here. Nothing Rush said in these quotes is racist -- unless you have trouble when someone says the word "black" or points out the absurdity of left wing thinking in America.

        Liberals have been playing the race card the moment Obama threw his hat in the ring. For Rush to point it out may be harsh to some, but as they say, the truth hurts.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:44 am ET)
          1  
          The right wing has set a standard for what a racist is this year by who they think is a racist. Almost every quote above (I got tired of reading all of it) would fall in the right wing standard of racism.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jmariemo (October 15, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
          2 1
          I would like to point out that it's inadvertently racist, not to mention entirey hypocritical, to claim someone is "playing the race card."
          Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (October 13, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
      15 8
      Limbaugh is a typical racist . . . he doesn't see that the racially offensive things he is saying are racially offensive because they aren't racially offensive to him.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 13, 2009 11:40 pm ET)
        5 22
        It's too bad you don't know what a racist is: Limbaugh is no racist. He does not hate nor is he afraid of blacks, he's not afraid of Latinos, he's not afraid of feminists or gays or liberals. Proof: he makes fun (really funny fun) of all those groups. Being politically incorrect is not racism. Racism is being unwilling to spoof or criticize a person because he/she is not a person of pallor. The real racists in this controversy are the those who are sure that the Black, the Latino, the woman, the Native American can't make it without 'our' help. AS G.W. Bush so insightfully called it, "The soft racism of diminished expectations." Lefties don't understand Limbaugh because they have no sense of humor. They are too ignorant to be able to laugh.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 14, 2009 12:53 am ET)
          9 2
          What are you going on about? Racism is being unwilling to spoof or criticize a person? Since when?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by internet soldier (October 14, 2009 4:47 am ET)
          12 2
          He does not hate nor is he afraid of blacks, he's not afraid of Latinos, he's not afraid of feminists or gays or liberals. Proof: he makes fun (really funny fun) of all those groups.

          I bow to your far more sophisticated sense of humor. Clearly Rush Limbaugh is far too subtle for us liberals. What with his "Uranis" jokes and his constant "bending over and grabbing the ankles imagery". I truly respect the dittohead's comic sensibilities.

          Racism is being unwilling to spoof or criticize a person because he/she is not a person of pallor. The real racists in this controversy are the those who are sure that the Black, the Latino, the woman, the Native American can't make it without 'our' help.

          Just like the real racists aren't the people who dress up in white sheets. Truly brilliant and original take on the matter, Edrossiwhatever.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 8:46 am ET)
          16 3
          Limbaugh is no racist. He does not hate nor is he afraid of blacks, he's not afraid of Latinos, he's not afraid of feminists or gays or liberals.
          Let's test that definition. So someone who believes that black people are genetically inferior and therefore shouldn't be allowed to spread that gene through marriage to white people wouldn't be a racist, right? Stating a simple fact in their mind would not be "hate", nor would it show that they were "afraid" of them.

          You can label negative stereotypes and generalizations "politically incorrect" all you like, but the attitude that one race is superior to another is racist. It doesn't rely on inferring emotions or motivations.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
            4 11
            Your hypothetical seems to me to lack a necessary component - which is fear --> hatred.
            I would be interested in reading your definition of racism. Is this it? "...the attitude that one race is superior to another is racist." Is racism an attitude? Or is it a feeling? Or is it speech? Is it action?
            I would differentiate between thinking that is 'racial' and that which is 'racist.'
            I also reject the idea that only white people can be racist as completely bogus.
            The very real racism that I have seen in my life has been hatred motivated by fear that resulted in real (active) discrimination, not just words. I've seen it in whites, in blacks and in native Americans.
            Because someone disagrees with a person of color on political, philosophical or moral grounds does not make them a racist. Jesse Jackson wanted to cut Obama's n___s off - does that make Jackson a racist? After all. it was a threat of violence against a black man.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 1:54 am ET)
              2  
              Is racism an attitude? Or is it a feeling? Or is it speech? Is it action?
              Speech and action stem from attitudes. "Feeling" would be fairly synonymous, as would "belief". And yes, the key qualification regards one race being superior to another. Neither fear nor hatred is necessary. For instance, someone could be very sympathetic to the cause of a race who they feel is inferior. They could have a condescending attitude. That doesn't involve hate or fear, yet it's clearly racist. How can you argue otherwise? If you heard someone say "those poor black people are so stupid...I feel so sorry for them" would you really think "oh, that's just racial...no big deal"?
              I also reject the idea that only white people can be racist as completely bogus.
              Who said that only white people can be racist?
              Because someone disagrees with a person of color on political, philosophical or moral grounds does not make them a racist. Jesse Jackson wanted to cut Obama's n___s off - does that make Jackson a racist? After all. it was a threat of violence against a black man.
              Right, I didn't say that any disagreement proved racism, either. Are you confusing me with someone else? I don't think it would even be racist for a white person to say that he wanted to castrate Obama, it would just be offensive. There needs to be something that generalizes or plays into a stereotype involved. If you read my post again, you'll see a very clear suggestion to that end, and absolutely nothing about threats of violence to specific people.

              I hope that helps.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
                  1
                "They could have a condescending attitude. That doesn't involve hate or fear, yet it's clearly racist."
                That 'condescending attitude is what is institutionalized in Affirmative Action. The Black Power movement (cp. Jeremiah Wright) claims that it is impossible for a black to be racist because they are not in a position of power.
                A previous post of yours compared Affirmative Action to 'stealing one's car back.' A better analogy would be stealing an innocent bystander's car too, to rectify the wrong done to you.
                However, I don't think your definition passes the 'use' test. I have been called a racist several times on this very thread, and I have said nothing that should be construed as stating or implying the superiority of any race. That's not a position I hold nor espouse.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 10:21 pm ET)
                     
                  That 'condescending attitude is what is institutionalized in Affirmative Action. The Black Power movement (cp. Jeremiah Wright) claims that it is impossible for a black to be racist because they are not in a position of power.
                  No, the reason for AA is to level the playing field, it doesn't mean that anyone thinks black people are inferior. It's pretty difficult for you to claim that you can't be accused of being a racist through your implications while saying that AA implies racism. As for the claim that racism is impossible for anyone, I disagree. Institutional racism is impossible for minorities, because they don't hold power within the system.
                  A previous post of yours compared Affirmative Action to 'stealing one's car back.' A better analogy would be stealing an innocent bystander's car too, to rectify the wrong done to you.
                  And as I said to someone else, you're not paying attention. The innocent bystander has every right to his car. People who only have their jobs because black people don't have those jobs do not have such a right if you believe that people of different races have the same capacities.
                  I have been called a racist several times on this very thread, and I have said nothing that should be construed as stating or implying the superiority of any race. That's not a position I hold nor espouse.
                  I have no idea how this is supposed to cast doubt on my definition. Even under the pretense that there's no basis for accusing you of racism (Rush isn't a racist because he makes fun of minorities? Such convoluted support for mockery of minorities is suspicious), then those accusing you would be off-base. That wouldn't influence the validity of my argument in the slightest. How do you believe otherwise, exactly?
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 9:39 am ET)
          15 3
          Really? I don't know what a racist is? Looks to me like it is YOU who doesn't understand racism. LOL! You fit my definition EXACTLY. A racist doesn't see that the racially offensive remarks he is saying are racially offensive because they aren't racially offensive to him personally. It's a form of narcissism.

          BTW, I'm not what most intelligent folks would call a "leftie," I'm actually a conservative who is sick of people like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, et al, defining conservatism with their decidedly PHONY conservatism.

          Looks like you aren't a conservative, just a Rushbot. No surprises.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (October 14, 2009 11:39 am ET)
          8 2
          Remember Rush's whine about a black kid punching out a white kid on the bus, and how the other black kids laughed? Remember Rush saying we needed to bring back segregated busing because of it?

          "white teens douse hispanic with lighter fluid, set him ablaze and laugh!"

          There's a story you won't hear about on the Rush Limbaugh show today.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by OhMy (October 14, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
              2
            This is a great example of how facts don't matter to most people. Snoopy, read the story you linked us all up with.
            Look at the pictures from the Miami Herald http://www.miamiherald.com/467/story/1281802.html
            You will see there are 2 white kids, a 2 black kids and a kid that looks not white charged with this crime. The victim is white.
            Please get your facts correct.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 6:53 pm ET)
            2 8
            Rush's satirical take on that event was that we needed to bring back segregated buses to protect the black kids from these obvious provocateurs, the white minority, on that bus. It's called "Humor." I typed that real slow for you.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (October 14, 2009 7:34 pm ET)
              7 2
              Hoooo hahaha heee hee he heee ho ho har! Hoo boy, satirical! Hooey, do you defenders of all things racist just chew your cud every day to come up with that?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
              2  
              The fact that you think suggesting black kids were all cheering as a white kid got beat up is satirical tells us all we need to know about you. And about the nuts who are still "true believers" of Limbaugh's nonsense.

              Where is the humor? I would also love to hear what is so humorous about bending over and grabbing your ankles and taking it because Obama had a black father. What does Rush being gay have to do with Obama having a black father?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 14, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
          9 1
          First things f---ing last...

          Lefties don't understand Limbaugh because they have no sense of humor. They are too ignorant to be able to laugh.

          Wrong! Fail! We don't laugh because it's nothing but gutter humor and schoolyard bullying. He's about as funny as a wedgie or a really good fart. You people don't realize this because you lack the requisite wit to recognize actual humor. Pointing and calling names isn't really all that funny. It you think it is than only an acute lack of wit can excuse you.

          Limbaugh is no racist. [...] Proof: he makes fun of all those groups.

          Ths might be the single stupidest thing I've ever read. (Or are you trying to be Steven Colbert here?) Telling racist jokes, means you're not racist. Making fun of minorities means you're not racist.

          Well, pat your self on the back my friend, becasause according to the same logic, saying stupid things means you're not stupid!

          --------------------------------------------------------------------
          OTOTH - If this was meant satiricaly, it was brilliant!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:48 am ET)
            1  
            "Rush's about as funny as a wedgie or a really good fart."

            Only if you're on the receiving end. Both are funny if you're not, Rush ain't funny. Never was.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
              5  
              He is funny to bullies. And to people with inferiority complexes. He is funny to people who dismiss their fears of minorities as justified. He says the things they wish they had the balls to say to the people that they are afraid of. Of course, Rush would never say any of this to anyone's face either. Because he, too, is a coward - as most bullies are.

              Also, I love the fact that Rush and Fox News's minions are trying so hard to make a new definition for racist. It is truly remarkable. You can read one post after another dismissing the idea that Rush Limbaugh could ever be a racist because he makes fun of black people. You can't be racist if you make fun of black people. What the-?! How ignorant and desperate do you have to be to create that definition.

              It should also be noted that the same people who scream that Limbaugh cannot be racist because he does satire of bending over and taking it from Obama are the same ones who were so quick to call out Sharpton as racist at the begining of this thread. (Even though Sharpton has NOTHING to do with Rush being racist.) Once again, and this must be pointed out everytime it appears, the far right is attempting to make racist a label that can only be applied to minorites. Gates, Obama, Sotomayor, Holder, etc. - all racists. Limbaugh - cannot be a racist because he makes jokes about black people. Wonderfully sick logic.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Lord of Light (October 14, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
          9 1
          The real racists in this controversy are the those who are sure that the Black, the Latino, the woman, the Native American can't make it without 'our' help.


          Ah, you're listening to Uncle Rush! Except he's never presented one iota of proof for this. Funny, but wasn't it terrible, awful liberals pushed the Civil Rights Act over conservative opposition? Almost every one of the first minorities to hold high office or a position of authority has been pushed by the left, not conservatives. I could go on. And yet, according to you and Rush, it's the left that doesn't want minorities to succeed. Keep citing those baseless arguments; it's entertaining.

          Also, if it's the left that's racist, then why is the GOP about 99 percent white? And probably 80 percent male?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:51 am ET)
            2  
            And when a minority is appointed by the right, They have no skills suited for the job. Look at Clarence Thomas versus Thurgood Marshell. Look at Condi Rice. Talk about tokenism.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
            1  
            Minorities like Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, Alberto Gonzales. Oh wait, those are all GW Bush appointees.
            It's not that the left doesn't want minorities to succeed, it's that the left is convinced minorities can't succeed unless they receive special 'help' from their white benefactors, the liberal left. If that's not true, then why does the left fight so hard for institutionalized racism (affirmative action)?
            Right now, Asain Americans with a 1600 SAT (old system scores) are only as likely to be accepted for college admission as a black student with a score 240 points lower. It is perverse.
            http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2006/11/13/16544/
            Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (October 14, 2009 2:21 pm ET)
          8 1
          How many minorities do conservatives run for office again? Now, how many do they appoint to positions? Now, last question: Who is Randy Gray, and what conservative party overwhelmingly elected him into office in Michigan?

          [http://www.mediamouse.org/wp-content/plugins/old-imgs/features/photos/092408-randy_gray_03.jpg]
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bvdon (October 14, 2009 7:11 pm ET)
              3
            How many do they appoint to office? President Bush had the most blacks in high level cabinet positions in his administration. More that Clinton. Ya dumb moonbat.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:54 am ET)
              1  
              Condi Rice was both a woman and a black. Two for the price of one!

              A woman who was an "expert" of Russian history and failed to notice Putin's moves? Failed to see 9-11 and failed to know how Iraq would be problem. Yeah, not tokenism there.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (October 15, 2009 10:34 am ET)
              1  
              Wow, so he appointed two! Y'all are on a roll now, keep it going, ya backwoods hick!
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jmariemo (October 15, 2009 5:48 pm ET)
                 
              Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice.
              Am I suppose to clap over that grand feat?
              Good conservative, good boy. You're not racist.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by theonlysaneone (October 15, 2009 11:31 pm ET)
                  2
                Do your research, bud:

                Colin Powell
                Coldoleezza Rice
                Rod Paige
                Alphonso Jackson

                Other non-whites in his cabinet:

                Alberto Gonzales
                Carlos Gutierrez
                Elaine Chao
                Mel Martinez
                Norman Mineta

                That's nine out of 47, or about one in five. Blacks represented four out of 47, or about one in twelve. Whites make up about 74% of the population of the US, so the proportion of white cabinet members in the Bush white house was slightly higher than that of the population. But not much higher.

                If you want to see racism, look at Obama's cabinet. He nominated four blacks and five other non-whites out of twenty. Since whites are so underrepresented in his cabinet, it's obvious that Obama secretly hates white people. Sure he has a few token whites to give the veneer of racial inclusion, but we still have a long way to go.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 10:36 pm ET)
            2 6
            Dear Snoopy: Same site you cited, just from the bottom of the page. I expect you only read what you want to see.
            Your article was posted in September, this in December. Nice try.

            Posted: December 5th, 2008 | Author: edcutlip |

            120508-randy_gray.jpg

            Randy Gray–a Ku Klux Klan member who was elected as a Republican Precinct Delegate in Midland County–has been removed from his post.

            The Midland County GOP removed Gray via a resolution before the Midland GOP convention last month. When Gray came to the convention, he was turned away at the door..."
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (October 15, 2009 10:32 am ET)
              3  
              So he was removed. Didn't stop y'all from voting for him, did it? Y'all had to be embarrassed into removing him from office...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
                  1
                Y'all have a are having a little trouble with reality, aren't you dear child. It'll be OK.
                This was an 'election' to a county central committee. They only had three candidates for three positions. About a third (59 of 179?) of those who voted, voted for him. But the committee removed him from his position prior to his ever being seated.
                I'm sure this is absolute proof that every Republican in America is an out and out racist! Great thinking, Snoopy! Talk about engaging in stereotypes.
                How pathetic.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by sleepy joe (October 14, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
          5 1
          "he's not afraid of Latinos, he's not afraid of feminists or gays or liberals. Proof: he makes fun (really funny fun) of all those groups"

          He makes fun of every group except white men.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:55 am ET)
            1  
            And gets his silk panties in a bunch when people do.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
              1
            I guess Bill Clinton and Al Gore aren't white men. There may be a case to be made that they aren't men, but they both appear to be Caucasians.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 6:04 pm ET)
              1  
              Making fun of two men isn't the same as making fun of a group.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 10:24 pm ET)
                 
              The word was "group". In other words, generalizing about races, not referring to specific people.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleLeft (October 14, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
          5 1
          It's too bad you don't know what a racist is: Limbaugh is no racist. He does not hate nor is he afraid of blacks, he's not afraid of Latinos, he's not afraid of feminists or gays or liberals.

          Oops. That is not the definition of a racist. Fear or hatred is not required. Ask your third grade elementary student child to explain it too you.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:45 am ET)
             
          "The soft racism of diminished expectations."

          That's sounds like Rush in a nutshell.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
          1  
          Please explain it to us, Ed. Who is he spoofing when he claims we have to bend over and grab your ankles and take it because Obama's father is black? Please enlighten us what Obama having a black father has to do with Rush being gay?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by southerngal (October 13, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
      4 14
      The meat of the speech that Limbaugh makes here, that MMfA reprints, is right on point, well said and I agree wholeheartedly.

      It's too bad it comes from a phony opportunistic racist like Limbaugh. Had someone with credibility and integrity said it, I would be impressed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (October 13, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
        7 2
        Yes and no. There are still barriers that prevent people from succeeding. Racism is still prevalent in this country and it hurts because many people in power hold these views. Report after report comes out about people with ethnic sounding names do not get called in for interviews. It's better than it was but we have a long way to go. Also Right On if Limbaugh is such a phony opportunistic racist why does he have the number one radio program in this country? Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmm.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (October 14, 2009 11:30 am ET)
          5 7
          He has the #1 radio program because he has the most listeners, that speaks to his popularity only, not his integrity.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (October 15, 2009 12:11 am ET)
            1 1
            That shows me many agree with him sooooooooooo if you agree he's a racist.........fill in theh blanks.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
                 
              Don't be too sure about that, mike. Not everyone who listens to him agrees with him. He is a shock jock, like Howard Stern. Do you know why Howard Stern is successful? Because people who love him listen to him for 2 hours because they want to hear what he says next. And, the people who hate him? They listen to him for fours hours because they want to hear what he has to say next. Shock jocks make their money off people hating them, not loving them.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 13, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
      13 4
      Rush vs. Rush

      I love this country. I want everyone in this country to succeed.

      I hope [Obama] fails.

      Mr. Limbaugh, how do you reconcile this obvious disparity?

      I guess my problem is I treat people as adults. I treat them as informed, I treat them as educated, and I treat them as equals.

      Thank you, Mr. Limbaugh, and I do hope that white jacket isn't too tight.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (October 13, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
        11 5
        And as Wanda Sykes put it so succinctly, I hope Limbaugh's kidneys fail.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (October 13, 2009 7:05 pm ET)
          10 4
          I'm rooting for his liver to get disgusted with digesting all his fatty bigoted remarks. The bile is vile.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (October 13, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
            9 4
            I figure his pancreas might go before the liver. What with all the sicky sweet love he and Becky are sharing these days. It's enough to give one diabetes.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (October 13, 2009 10:52 pm ET)
              9 2
              Urine alysis is spot on as usual, jj. Nice to see that Becky is such a liver of Limbaugh. They both like to vent their spleens until they explode:
              [http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:4IH-WleKgxnLSM:http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_E2zu0PHEpQI/SX87Q7WZvYI/AAAAAAAAAAM/bPC4BRXyDRw/s1600-R/tweedledee-tweedledum-3.jpg]
              Report Abuse
      • Author by mookie von zipper (October 14, 2009 12:08 am ET)
        4 10
        nothing to reconcile here, these are two different subjects... why would he want obama's policies to succeed if he's not in favor of them?... how many people who opposed bush at every turn hoped his policies succeeded if they thought they were bad for the country?... it makes no sense to hope that someone you voted against succeeds in implementing policies you disagree with...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 14, 2009 12:56 am ET)
          8 4
          I think you must have posted on the wrong thread. This isn't about Rush hoping for Obama's policies failing, or about any people hoping that Bush's policies failed. This is about Rush being a racist.

          Off topic post, please don't feed the troll.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 8:49 am ET)
            4 12
            I love how you constantly interject yourself as the purveyor of who deserves a response and who doesn't.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 14, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
              7 1
              NOW who has their panties in a bunch?

              ----------------------------------------------------------------
              :P
              Report Abuse
            • Author by MiddleLeft (October 14, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
              5 1
              I love how you constantly interject yourself as the purveyor of who deserves a response and who doesn't.

              I love how you interject yourself as the purveyor of who is allowed to decide which comment deserves a response.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 14, 2009 11:22 am ET)
          4 3
          It's not two different subjects at all, mookie. Limbaugh didn't say "I want everyone in this country except Obama to succeed," he said "everyone." This, coupled with his famously hypocritical "I hope Obama fails" statement (since he falsely accused liberals of saying that they hoped G.W. would fail) is why his recent statement is so two-faced.

          I hope that's clear enough for you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
            2 11
            I read a quote from Carville issued on September 11, 2001, that he hoped Bush failed. Carville is a political animal, and he works very hard to achieve the failure of his political opponents. Limbaugh is a political satirist, and he expends a lot of energy to achieve the failure of his political opponents. But Carville is not a racist because he's a liberal, and Bush is white. Obama, however, is a black man, so Rush's opposition to him is racist, according to the thinking of the left. Such thinking is the personification of rank hypocrisy.
            While I hope for the success of everyone in doing good, if Obama succeeds in his agenda, it will be a colossal and evil failure for this country and the world. So I hope Obama fails to achieve his goals. I hope his agenda does not reach fruition.
            That is a political statement and is not racist.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
              3 1
              Carville is a partisan loon, too. Your point is?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 14, 2009 6:14 pm ET)
              4 2
              Limbaugh said "liberals," he didn't say "Carville." What's the matter with you, can't you actually address the point I was making? And then you go further into the gutter by dragging in the notion of who thinks who is a racist and why (for the record, there are many Rush quotes that show he's a racist, irrespective of his direct comments about Obama--read up on why he's not getting to buy his own football team, for instance). Your "according to the thinking of the left," is, of course, flat-out wrong, so there is no substance to your claim of "rank hypocrisy."

              Consider yourself refuted (and I didn't even ask you to provide a link to the supposed Carville quote).
              Report Abuse
              • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 10:50 pm ET)
                2 6
                Gee, thanks for your non sequitur, PLRR. Perhaps you're not aware of this, but Carville is a spokesman of the left - a liberal.
                "(for the record, there are many Rush quotes that show he's a racist" No, there are many quotes that you think show him to be a racist. If words make one a racist, Hillary Clinton is a racist. Bill Clinton is a racist (according to the Obama campaign - remember?). But words do not a racist make.
                Nice try, though.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pilotx (October 15, 2009 12:16 am ET)
                  3 1
                  Let's put it this way. Rush seems to me to be a racist by his past comments. Maybe he's not but he plays one very well.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 11:07 am ET)
                  1  
                  Carville is a spokesman of the left - a liberal

                  Like, duh! As if anyone ever said he wasn't. Doesn't touch my argument any.

                  No, there are many quotes that you think show him to be a racist.

                  I don't use this term lightly, but you're an idiot if you think that. The words a person uses are a reflection of their thinking. Since Limbaugh has so often spouted racist garbage, then that's what he thinks and feels as well.

                  If words make one a racist, Hillary Clinton is a racist. Bill Clinton is a racist (according to the Obama campaign - remember?).

                  By all means, show us a quote from the Obama campaign that claimed this. Whatever was said isn't a molehill compared to Limbaugh's mountain of vile.

                  But words do not a racist make.

                  Refuted earlier.

                  Nice try, though.

                  Better than a "nice try," since I refuted you again. And notice how many of my points you ignored.

                  You lost, Mr. Ed. Now try again somewhere else.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by mookie von zipper (October 15, 2009 9:32 am ET)
            1 4
            if you want to lump everything rush says about success and failure under a single broad brush, and can't discern subject matters from one another, then responding to this is impossible...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 11:09 am ET)
              1  
              Saying that he wants everyone in America to succeed is a broad brush. Take it up with Limbaugh, then.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Loneblender (October 14, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
        1 1
        I believe Rush has said several times that he hopes Obama fails because if Obama succeeds, America loses. You are taking that quote out of context. Please stop drinking the kool-aid.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (October 13, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
      4 5
      Sounds like Keith and Rachel could have a field day
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (October 13, 2009 6:03 pm ET)
      14 3
      Rush, like other right-wing professional liars, talks a great game about everyone, regardless of race or gender, being able to succeed in the land of opportunity. But when a woman or the member minority does work hard and does succeed and is slated for a prominent leadership position, that candidate is immediately dismissed by Limbaugh as a product of affirmative action, white guilt, or some other twisted logic revolving around race.

      Right-wing professional liars want women and minorities to succeed, they just don't want them to be in charge of anything.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (October 13, 2009 6:26 pm ET)
        8 2
        Right-wing professional liars want women and minorities to succeed, they just don't want them to be in charge of anything.

        Give Rush a break. He's just worried that we'll get cut if we break through that glass ceiling.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:59 am ET)
          2  
          He wants women and minorities to succeed at serving him dinner.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 13, 2009 11:57 pm ET)
        3 18
        The credibility of every person eligible for affirmative action is suspect - precisely because of the existence of affirmative action!
        If Clarence Thomas wasn't black, he wouldn't be on the Supreme Court. If Thurgood Marshall had been white, he would never have been nominated to the court. If Sonia Sotomayor were not a female and/or a Latino, she would not have been considered for the Supreme Court. All those people (and 1000s more) are expedient political appointees, not appointments from principle.
        Certainly, if Obama were not a black man, he wouldn't be President today. He as much as said so himself. Instead of ameliorating racism, affirmative action has prolonged its life.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by clams casino (October 14, 2009 12:44 am ET)
          11 2
          I honestly can't tell if your post is satire or not. You seem to be saying that any non-white person in a position of power doesn't deserve that position. Therefore affirmative action is racist? wtf?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
            3 10
            It's not that anyone of color can't be competent to hold a position of power. It's that Affirmative Action calls into question the achievement of every person of color, precisely because of the existence of Affirmative Action. Did this person get this position based upon merit or upon racial preference? As long as Affirmative Action is the policy, the question is inevitable. Affirmative action is in its essence racist and/or sexist.
            The principle is one taught very early in western culture - usually on a parent's knee - "Two wrongs don't make a right." If it is wrong to discriminate against a black or a woman based upon their race and/or gender, surely it is wrong to discriminate for a person based on their race and/or gender.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
              5 1
              But then the existence of systemic racism calls into question the achievements of all white people. "Did this person get this position based upon merit or because none of the minorities got it?"

              See, here's the thing: if you believe that people are inherently equal, then there's really not a lot to complain about here. Even if you're talking about quotas, where you had to hire a certain percentage of workers based on the percentage of the population, then you should believe that all of your workers have the same capacity anyway. Unless you're a racist, of course. So the lack of hiring proportionate numbers would then mean that you were giving jobs to white people who didn't deserve them. That doesn't seem right either.
              "Two wrongs don't make a right." If it is wrong to discriminate against a black or a woman based upon their race and/or gender, surely it is wrong to discriminate for a person based on their race and/or gender.
              If it's wrong to discriminate against minorities, then fixing that would be a correction of that wrong. Your argument is like saying that it was wrong for you to steal a car, but the owner stealing it back is wrong also.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by goka1ball (October 14, 2009 7:13 pm ET)
                1 1
                More accurately it would be like stealing a random persons car because someone stole your car.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 9:15 am ET)
                  1  
                  No, you're not paying attention. We're talking about groups here, remember. If you believe in racial equality, then having a disproportionate amount of white employees means that some of those employees don't deserve their jobs. If it was some random person's car, then that person would rightfully own it.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 10:59 pm ET)
                2 5
                I agree - the south bore a terrible cost because of Jim Crow. But I don't believe that everyone is equal in their abilities. If you heard me sing, you would agree. People are or should be equal before the law. Fixing the problem of discrimination by institutionalizing a reverse discrimination is insane.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 1:39 am ET)
                  3 1
                  Christ on a crutch, man. I'm not saying that everyone has the exact same talents. I'm talking about job aptitude, and I'm talking about racial groups.

                  Why is everyone not equal before the law in this scenario? Should white people become a minority, the exact same system would protect them. And it's completely inane to argue that because those in the majority don't need protection from systemic racism that it's somehow unfair that those that do would get it. That's like complaining that it's unfair for a charity to deliver food to the poor but not the rich.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by TruthHurts (October 15, 2009 12:12 am ET)
                2 5
                Simply bad logic. Oh, well. I wandered in here really interested to see why anyone would really care about whether or not Limbaugh does or does not buy the Rams (I didn't care and wondered why anyone would).

                What I got was a political discussion. Wow. The left and the right each have their whiners. They are equally divisive but that should not preclude them from a business deal.

                A few simple truths.
                -- Capitalism, even with its shortcomings, is still the purest model for human achievement
                -- Capitalism is driven by financial incentives and is truly colorblind. It is just that building wealth takes time; sometimes generations.
                -- Financial incentives are inherently absent in government action.
                -- Politics is really about control of money and power (and ultimately control of people) and politicians are the worst kind of hypocrites for expousing otherwise.
                -- With that as backdrop, politicians are out for themselves. Only individuals can determine their productivity for society. If we all just got busy producing something valuable for society and did not worry so much about the what the next guy thought or did, it would deem irrelevant guys like Limbaugh and Olbermann, as well as those who thought less of us because of our upbringing, color of skin, etc. It's a whole lot more fun than whining anyway.

                Pointing fingers at others for lack of success is reserved for the incapable, the unskilled and most importantly the unindustrious.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 9:22 am ET)
                  3  
                  Can you specify what the "bad logic" is supposed to be, instead of going off on tangents?
                  They are equally divisive but that should not preclude them from a business deal.
                  Why should they allow someone who is going to create controversy to own a team? It's not good for business, so it's perfectly consistent with capitalism to refuse that person.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 10:26 am ET)
                  1  
                  ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
                     
                  I bet you like to smell your own farts too!
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by pilotx (October 15, 2009 12:33 am ET)
              3 1
              I feel the exact same way about history in this country. Since people of color were kept out of so many endeavors every record or accomplishment should be questioned. Would Babe Ruth have held the home run record as long as he did if Black people had been allowed to participate? How many major league records would Satchel Page have set if he'd been allowed to pitch before he was in his 40's? How many successful Anglos would not be in the positions they are in now if competent people of color had been allowed to compete fairly for the position? There has always been AA in this country for Anglo males but no one wants to discuss this. Hell, GWB got into Yale based on AA. I guess as long as AA only benefits certain males huh? I know for a fact many unqualified Anglo males were hired as commercial airline pilots while Black WW II veterans were not. If that ain't AA what is?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 9:01 am ET)
          8 1
          How did Obama suggest that he wouldn't be President if he wasn't black?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
            2 11
            He said, in an interview, I think with Barbara Walters, that he was very fortunate to be in the position he was in, that it was obvious that, given his age and lack of experience, he would have had the opportunities he was enjoying if he were not a black man.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 9:41 am ET)
          8 3
          Embrace your racism, edross . . . and your lack of intelligence. You OWN them, bub!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
            3 8
            I may be unintelligent, my friend, but I am neither a bigot nor a racist.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
              6 3
              You are if you think that what you posted above was legit. You, like most racists, refuse to see your racially offensive comments. You make excuses as to why they are not racially offensive.

              Own it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 14, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
                4 5
                I have demeaned no one, I have denied no one their rights, I have harmed no one. I speak not out of malice nor fear.
                I have punctured one of your sacred cows, perhaps, but that does not mean that I am a racist. Where are these 'racially insensitive' comments of mine?
                Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
                 
              "I may be unintelligent, my friend, but I am neither a bigot nor a racist." - edross

              Let me guess...because you make fun of black people. And you can't be racist if you make fun of them. Well played. Crazy as all heck, but well played.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by sleepy joe (October 14, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
          2  
          So are you saying that every non-white person in a position of power got that power because of affirmative action? So only white men have to qualities required for these positions? Only white men work hard enough to deserve thes positions?

          The racism is as clear as day.

          Sadly, too many people in this country would agree with you.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:04 am ET)
          1  
          Thurgood Marshall and Sonia Sotomayor were among the most qualified individuals to have ever been on the Supreme Court period.

          Both would definitely have been nominated if they were white men.

          Marshall would have been in earlier if he was white. Sotomayor is more qualified at all facets of law than both Roberts and Olito.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:37 pm ET)
          2  
          Wow. That is excellent how you blame your own racism on affirmative action while actually explaining why we still need affirmative action - because of people like YOU.

          Thurgood Marshall was only on the Supreme Court because of Affirmative Action? You may want to read up on Thurgood Marshall a little bit - also Sotomayor. Then compare their records to Clarence Thomas. See the difference? That would be like saying Alito only got on the Supreme Court because he is Italian. No, he got on the Court because of his long, distinguished record.

          Now, Obama only got elected because he was a black man? Wow. Yeah, because all those black presidents that preceded him. He really had quite the advantage being a black man running for president. That's why there have been so many black men running the country. How exactly does affirmative action work on a secret ballot? How bad does your inferiority complex have to run for you to believe this nonsense, EdRoss?

          If you were doing satire, I apologize. If this post was serious, EdRoss, seek help. Do some reading. Enlighten yourself. You sound like a lunatic.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (October 13, 2009 7:02 pm ET)
      15 4
      What about the old, "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back..." Rush quote when he was talking to a black caller back in his Jeff Christie days?

      And don't forget the, "All criminal composite drawings look like Jesse Jackson."

      Yeah, the man is a peach! A PEACH I tell ya!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:05 am ET)
        1  
        He was Rush Limbaugh when I heard him made the "bone" quote or at least he repeated it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by KaiserD2 (October 13, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
      4 2
      That was a good piece and you do a good job, but you never mention the worst racism on the show--the parodies, often in song, which Rush runs from time to time. There was one during last year's Democratic convention pretending to be a gangbanger complaining that Michelle's ("Shellie's") speech sounded too white. There have been a couple purportedly of Obama singing. It's real minstrel-show stuff.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (October 13, 2009 7:44 pm ET)
      7 3
      limbaugh made his comments about mcnabb in 2003. he claimed he's not "that good", and implied that the press only talked him up because they wanted to see a black man succeed. these are statistics from the 2002 season, in which mcnabb had a better quarterback rating than a couple guys named brady and favre. you can claim the defense helps, but the defense doesn't throw the ball. the nfl is a business and it doesn't need owners who have to turn an athletic contest into a racial issue or imply a black man is only a token.
      Your text to link here...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by benjr (October 13, 2009 8:05 pm ET)
        9 3
        I'm an Eagles fan and I love McNabb. I remember watching ESPN when Rush said that, and I remember thinking "What??". The funny thing is, it destroyed his sports commentary career, and now it looks like that comment and all of his others are finally coming home to roost.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by donwelty (October 13, 2009 8:12 pm ET)
        8 3
        Since Limbaugh made his comments about Donovan McNabb, there have been other Black quarterbacks in NFL. So if Limbaugh makes a comment only about one of them should he be considered a racist. I think the answer that question is "yes." Rush, there are still a lot of other quarterbacks in the NFL who don't happen to be white. You're slipping. And what about those quarterbacks and team members who actually like Donovan McNabb and other black quarterbacks? You haven't mentioned them at all. If you have the same show in the 1950s when black players were first coming into the NFL, you probably would be making similar comments. Rush, you have a lot of work cut out for you. And Rush what about the white players? Aren't they homosexuals, liberals, or whatever because they choose to work in an organization that is 60% minority.

        Rush, you have the entire NFL to insult. Get up and insult them. Show us that you're not just capable of putting down minorities. Shows that you are an equal opportunity bigot-- you don't just dislike Black players, you can find the reason to dislike all of them.

        Don't let us down.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mookie von zipper (October 14, 2009 12:21 am ET)
        5 9
        i don't know that he said mcnabb was not that good... but saying mcnabb was overrated because the media wants a black QB to succeed is neither true, false or racist, it was just an opinion... what is fact is that he was only above average in 01, 02 and 03 with 7 or 8 other QB's rated higher but hyped nowhere near the level mcnabb was... and philly's defense didn't merely help, they carried that team...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (October 14, 2009 7:51 am ET)
          5 1
          he said mcnabb "was not that good from the get go". mcnabb was and is a very good quarterback. nor was he the first black quarterback to win.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mookie von zipper (October 15, 2009 9:46 am ET)
              3
            i had the privilege of watching warren moon here in houston during his oiler years... EVERY nfl team passed on him in the college draft, including the oilers, who later had the sense to sign him after he kicked ass in canada for 6 seasons...

            the nfl is fine as long as you're a drug dealer, wife beater, dog killer, drunken manslaughterer or flat out accomplice to murder... but don't go sharing your opinions on the airwaves unless you want to be branded a racist by people who are too lazy to check facts, or too insensitive to deal with race honestly...

            hypocrites...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:18 am ET)
                 
              Rush in a nutshell.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 10:53 am ET)
              1  
              yea mook the NFL should just add another pill poppin' racist to the fold as an OWNER. Dude your becoming more and more incoherent. Rush deals with race honestly? Why, because he's not afraid to show his racism? He calls it like it is? "Take that bone out your nose and call me back," or something to that effect he told a Afro-American caller. Sound like a sensitive guy honestly dealing with race to you?
              You cons tickle me in how you will twist and turn to defend each other. dropping all logic and reason,even contradicting yourself from day to day just to argue against the "others",us,the liberal commie fascist socialist whatevers. A few comments may be questionalble so lets forget the tons of other evidence?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by VJay912 (October 15, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
                   
                If you were honest with yourself you'd go and listen for yourself instead of relying on what other people tell you.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (October 14, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
          4  
          A quarterback is not rated on stats, but on wins and losses. Period. McNabb took Philly to 4 consecutive NFC championship games and one Super Bowl. He's a winner. Period.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 8:46 am ET)
              3
            Heh Heh Heh. How nice to see all you McNabb fans forget how he applauded his own team mate throwing picks last year. In McNabb's world there is an "I" in the word "team".........
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mookie von zipper (October 15, 2009 9:47 am ET)
              4
            winner?... without a doubt...

            overrated?... without a doubt...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:21 am ET)
              2  
              Overrated? I doubt that he'll get near the hype that Farve has gotten every single time he retired. So many other quarterbacks of lesser skills and whiter complexions get rated higher than McNabb. I'm not saying it's racist I'm just baffled on how people can call McNabb overrated. Considering the Vick situation, not much was said about the possibility that McNabb was being pushed aside.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mookie von zipper (October 15, 2009 10:58 am ET)
                  1
                espn's "nfl countdown" and "sportscenter" should change their names to "the farve report"...

                Report Abuse
              • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
                   
                You're wasting your time with Mookie. He purposefully ignores McNabb's best years. We have already been through this with him. He compares McNabb to David Carr. It's not that he's racist, he just loves Rush and knows NOTHING about the NFL.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:16 am ET)
          2  
          The funny thing about McNabb is that he wasn't overexposed or overhyped enough to deserve what Rush said.

          The quote would have made sense if McNabb had the skills of a Anna Kournikova with all the hype that she had.

          McNabb was a top 5 quarterback whose hype was overshadowed by many more than 5 quarterbacks at the time. If anything he was underrated. The idea of a quarterback being black was far from novel at that point, so Rush was behind the times on that too.

          So it would stand that Rush is a common racist.

          Here's the thing, Rush is a football fan. He got a sweet gig. He blew it because he didn't realize that he had to change his approach to football analysis from his racist radio show.

          He could have taken tips from George Carlin when Carlin would appear on network TV and children's shows. He toned down his act to a different audience. Rush is a professional according to Rush.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
             
          We know what you believe Mookie. You believe David Carr is comparable to McNabb. We all read it last time. What it does tell us is you know nothing about quarterbacks or football.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (October 13, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
      5 2
      Chris Matthews said today that Rush Limbaugh was 'phone sex' to alot of Traveling Salesmen, LOL. Yeap, makes sense to us too.

      Question: So, what self-respecting American (man or woman) would publicly admit to participating in 'phone sex' with Rush Limbaugh five days a week? LOL
      Report Abuse
    • Author by clams casino (October 13, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
      8 3
      "I'm colorblind" is just like "I have black friends." It's something racists say when they're trying to prove they aren't racist. Does Rush know he's doing a Stephen Colbert routine?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HOOX (October 13, 2009 9:34 pm ET)
      3 2
      he sees race in everything
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CitizenX (October 14, 2009 8:31 am ET)
      3 10
      Why would Rush Limbaugh want to be part owner in a league that is 70% black? Why would he want to pay those same blacks millions to play a game for 6 months a year if he is racist? He wouldn't. And don't tell me its about the money because he makes way too much now to need the headache of an NFL team, especially one that is losing.

      Many people like to call Rush a racist because they don't agree with his views and opinions. What ever happened to the First Amendment? Oh yeah, political correctness supplanted it. Whether you agree with him or not, does not make him a racist.

      I would like some fact checking on when and where he made the comments that people so quickly attribute to him. Once that is done by responsible journalists, I will make my decision on Rush.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (October 14, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
        4 2
        You must be kidding.I'm sure there are some current owners that are probably racist just like Rush but are smart enough not to say stupid, obviously racist stuff.Do you think slave owners were racist?...it's about making more money then and the same now!! Thomas Jefferson was racist but empathetic to the plight of slaves, but he owned slaves and fathered half black children... so did racist Strom Thurmond!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by palani (October 14, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
        4 3
        I would like some fact checking on when and where he made the comments that people so quickly attribute to him...

        LOL! What part of racially charged words, themes, terms, etc., don't you get? His HISTORY of racism and bigotry speaks for itself.

        And how rich of you to demand fact checking. Do you fact check the cruxes of Rush's daily rants? After all, it's not like there is a different POV there with him in his studio to counter the divisive slop he dispenses daily.



        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleLeft (October 14, 2009 4:36 pm ET)
          5 1
          Do you fact check the cruxes of Rush's daily rants?

          I once imagined a school project based on fact checking a Rush radio show but realized that even one hour would be a very long project.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:22 am ET)
        1  
        And don't forget those pesky unions he'd have to deal with.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:24 am ET)
        1  
        The first amendment is a two way street. Rush says something racist. I call him a racist. The difference is that he gets paid millions to be a racist.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 8:56 am ET)
      2 10
      Is MMFA going to retract its promotion of Bryan Burwell's comments since those comments were based on lies? Probably not. Nice job of checking your sources on that story MMFA!!

      http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910070009
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 9:07 am ET)
        6 2
        Can you be bothered to specify what the lies are?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 10:05 am ET)
          3 9
          The comment about the streets being safer after dark during times of slavery. And the one about the NAACP and riot rehearsals. These are false quotes attributed to Limbaugh.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
            5 1
            The NAACP one dates back to 1993, from what I see, so I'm not sure what evidence can be found without hardcopy or taped programs. The slavery quote is probably a more legitimate complaint.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:26 am ET)
              1  
              He said that back in 90-91, back in the early days of his national radio show. This was the days he had "caller abortion" and celebrated the death of Mitch Snyder.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 9:33 am ET)
        6 1
        Burwell referenced ONE unsourced quote. Whether it is true or not is still up in the air, it is being researched by the newspaper AS WE SPEAK. The rest of Burwell's quotes in his article are documented. Nice job of checking your sources kydem09.

        http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/columnists.nsf/bryanburwell/story/E196145D80764B2F86257648000EF26B?OpenDocument
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 10:10 am ET)
          4 9
          Two of the quotes are wrong. If you can find anything to document that Limbaugh said what was attributed to him about the NAACP and riot rehearsals, I'll back off that part of my objection. I'm not a news source as MMFA claims to be. MMFA lauded the Burwell article and placed it prominently at its site. MMFA should clarify that the article was based on false quotes. MMFA is always criticizing people for not fact checking their sources, yet MMFA does the exact same thing when it benefits their agenda. They need to "man up" and admit they were wrong to run with the story without first verifying its content.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 10:42 am ET)
            5 3
            Only one quote in Burwell's article has been found to be suspect and it is still being researched. I'm sure that when the final word is given there will be a retraction, if necessary. It's irrelevant in the scheme of things, however, because there are more than enough documented quotes to show Limbaugh's racism.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 11:03 am ET)
              3 8
              That's subjective. Offensive and politically incorrect comments don't necessarily translate into racism.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 11:40 am ET)
                6 2
                As I said above, racists rarely see the racially offensive comments that others see as racially offensive. It's part and parcel of being a racist.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 11:10 am ET)
              2 9
              By the way, both the quotes in Burwell's article have been called into question.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 11:41 am ET)
                7 2
                Not according to the post I posted above. And, as I said, totally irrelevant. Rush has made more than enough racially offensive comments in the past . . . having two false ones don't negate the effect of the other real ones.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by CitizenX (October 14, 2009 11:50 am ET)
                  2 8
                  Quick question........then do you find Sen. Byrd's continued employ in the Senate to be highly offensive and he to be a racist? After all, he was in the KKK.....just wondering if we are playing situational ethics here or being objective and honest.....
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
                    6 2
                    When Limbaugh denounces his own behavior, you let us know.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
                    4 1
                    Yep.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
                    6 1
                    Hit reply before I finished. I find Byrd's continued employ in the Senate offensive; however, since I'm from Texas and not his constituent, there's not much I can do about it, now is there? Also, there is a difference. Byrd has publicly apologized for his stupidity in participating in the KKK . . . Rush has never apologized for being racist. He just blames other folks for calling attention to his racism as a means to excuse it.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Lord of Light (October 14, 2009 1:31 pm ET)
                    4 2
                    Quick question: Were you this upset about Strom Thurmond, the formerly adamant segregationalist?

                    Also, nice cliche argument. Byrd was in the KKK 60 years and and renounced it. Rush is still saying this stuff in 2009.

                    Byrd has nothing to do with Rush's race-baiting.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
                      4 2
                      Yeah, I was just as upset that Thurmond stayed in office as long as he did and just as upset that Joe Wilson, current hero of some members of the GOP, defended Thurmond's racism by deriding his black daughter for "smearing" Thurmond's name by announcing her parentage.

                      And, Lord of Light is correct. Rush has never apologized for his blatant racism, he just blames other folks for calling him on it.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by palani (October 14, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
                    5 2
                    Byrd has atoned for his past via his words and actions. Rush?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
                         
                      Byrd lied about his association wit the KKK when it was no longer an advantage to be associated with it. He was an officer in the Klan and promoted it long after he said he wasn't a part of it. He said he would never serve in the Armed Forces with a negro by his side. (He didn't serve, anyway.)
                      But he's not a racist.
                      And there is a Santa Claus.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:29 am ET)
                    1  
                    Byrd had a mea culpa, Rush doesn't disavow anything he said.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
              2 8
              MMFA should have checked the quotes BEFORE republishing them. MMFA constantly derides others for not doing leg work, now that they're caught in the crosshairs doing the same thing, they're dragging their feet in admitting their mistake.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
                5 1
                It's still under investigation kydem.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by palani (October 14, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
                4  
                Do you put what Rush, or for that matter, O'Reilly, Hannity, Malkin, Drudge, Boortz, freeper sites, et all, under the same scrutiny?

                Let's be consistent here.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by kydem09 (October 14, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
                  3 7
                  Let's be consistent? Tell that to MMFA. They're the ones who always complain about someone running with a story before fact-checking it. In this instance they dropped the ball. It's been more than 24 hours since the veracity of the comments have been called into serious question and MMFA has yet to retract the story they posted and trumpeted. But to answer your question, I would want anyone reporting information to fact check prior to running the story. And if they didn't, they should have an immediate retraction.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by TheVision (October 14, 2009 9:35 am ET)
      6 3
      Maybe it's just me, but I have to wonder how and why people with a clear message of intolerance and divisiveness thrive and become successful. Almost to the status of icon. It is difficult, if just down right impossible for me to fathom that any person could possibly consider him a voice for anyone.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mookie von zipper (October 15, 2009 10:04 am ET)
          3
        if anyone is divisive it's liberal politicians pandering to their base of special interest ethnic and gender demographics rather than appealing to our common humanity, which is what rush does...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:33 am ET)
          2  
          "...than appealing to our common humanity, which is what rush does..."

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          Rush wants us to be what HE determines we should be, and if we were to do what he wants this country would collapse. Look at the Bush years. That's the closest we came to Rush paradise.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mookie von zipper (October 15, 2009 11:02 am ET)
              3
            he espouses the freedom to choose whatever you think you should be, even if it's misguided... as opposed to government intervening in our business for our own good... do you think any bozo in public office today knows better than yourself what's best for you?...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 11:11 am ET)
                 
              so your pro-choice and against the PATRIOT ACT. good to know!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
                1  
                No, mookie has made it very clear that he believes whatever Rush tells him to believe. Elected officals are all bozos, but Rush - he is someone to take marching orders from. Very sad. Mookie actually believe this entertainer who acts like a political leader has Mookie's best interests at heart. You could do a case-study on these people and their need to have their own fears and prejudices reinforced.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:33 am ET)
             
          "...than appealing to our common humanity, which is what rush does..."

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          Rush wants us to be what HE determines we should be, and if we were to do what he wants this country would collapse. Look at the Bush years. That's the closest we came to Rush paradise.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jpcapone (October 14, 2009 9:42 am ET)
      7 3
      the people who dont realize rush is racist are the same people to say racism does not exist. and that in itself is proof that racism is alive and well. oh and one more point: republicans never attempt to have any form of honest and open discussions on race. matter of fact, if you bringing it up you are playing the race card. who can blame them though, they were proud slave owners.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bvdon (October 14, 2009 7:08 pm ET)
        1 4
        You're an idiot. Simply because Rush addresses, head on, the liberal kooks regardless of color does not make him a racist. I've been listening to Rush since '92 and I don't ever recall him saying anything that made me think he is a racist.

        Of course, if your job includes talking about clowns like:

        Jesse Jackson: ("He's talking down to black people ... telling n-----s how to behave,... I want to cut his nuts off"

        Al Sharpton "We will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business."

        Reverend Wright: "them Jews ain't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office."

        I COULD GO ON ALL DAY.... do you moonbats not see how talking about this directly could lead a non-listener to believe that Rush is instigating this stuff? Put Rush in context and note when he is being satirical and anyone with half a brain would see that Rush is not a racist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 9:04 am ET)
          1  
          How is it "satirical" to claim that Obama's agenda is all about reparations, or that football is like "bloods vs. crips"? Who is being satirized, exactly?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
            1  
            Once again the right tries to apply racism only to black and brown people. Bvdon posts comments by Jackson, Sharpton, and Wright that he thinks are racist. However, he defends Rush Limbaugh and his "take the bone out your nose" nonsense. Which is it bvdon? Anyone with "half a brain" could see your obvious inconsistency. Your love for Rush trumps your honest and your intellect. Do you understand that context?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
              1
            Liberal buffoons.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
                 
              I've read your post you shouldn't be caling names.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
                   
                I know this is off topic but has anyone else seen this:



                HAMMOND, La. — A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have.

                Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

                Neither Bardwell nor the couple immediately returned phone calls from The Associated Press. But Bardwell told the Daily Star of Hammond that he was not a racist.

                "I do ceremonies for black couples right here in my house," Bardwell said. "My main concern is for the children."

                Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

                "I don't do interracial marriages because I don't want to put children in a situation they didn't bring on themselves," Bardwell said. "In my heart, I feel the children will later suffer."

                If he does an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.

                "I try to treat everyone equally," he said.

                Story continues below

                Thirty-year-old Beth Humphrey and 32-year-old Terence McKay, both of Hammond, say they will consult the U.S. Justice Department about filing a discrimination complaint.

                Humphrey told the newspaper she called Bardwell on Oct. 6 to inquire about getting a marriage license signed. She says Bardwell's wife told her that Bardwell will not sign marriage licenses for interracial couples.

                "It is really astonishing and disappointing to see this come up in 2009," said American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana attorney Katie Schwartzman. "The Supreme Court ruled as far back as 1963 that the government cannot tell people who they can and cannot marry."

                The ACLU was preparing a letter for the Louisiana Supreme Court, which oversees the state justices of the peace, asking them to investigate Bardwell and see if they can remove him from office, Schwartzman said.

                "He knew he was breaking the law, but continued to do it," Schwartzman said.

                According to the clerk of court's office, application for a marriage license must be made three days before the ceremony because there is a 72-hour waiting period. The applicants are asked if they have previously been married. If so, they must show how the marriage ended, such as divorce.

                Other than that, all they need is a birth certificate and Social Security card.

                The license fee is $35, and the license must be signed by a Louisiana minister, justice of the peace or judge. The original is returned to the clerk's office.


                Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/interracial-couple-denied_n_322784.html
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
                 
              How would that be "satire"? A counterpart to someone like Stephen Colbert would be satire of liberals.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:36 am ET)
          2  
          And listening to Rush since 1992 and you don't recall anything he said that makes you think he's a racist?

          Way to prove capone right. Only racists don't see racism in what Rush says.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by minnesotablue (October 14, 2009 10:02 am ET)
      8 3
      Rush has all the money he will ever need! However all his money can't buy him respect. As much as he loves football he will be shut out of any ownership of a NFL team. Karma don't you think!


      Report Abuse
      • Author by skysaxon (October 14, 2009 11:43 am ET)
        9 2
        Racism is not just about hate, it is about discrmination.

        "Racism: a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others
        discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion
        based on racial intolerance"

        That definition defines Rush Limbaugh.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by garybegd3231 (October 14, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
        6 2
        Bingo!

        Rush is at his heart a broadcaster. He had his dream broadcasting job on ESPN, but screwed it up and got fired. Now he is trying to buy with money what he couldn't hold onto with his "talent on loan from God." I guess God couldn't stop him from putting his foot in his mouth.

        If he gets the team, I expect black players to charge extra to play for him. And in a salary capped NFL, that will mean his money won't buy enough talent to be competitive. The market, black players, would attach a surcharge, a price for playing for a racist jerk. In the market of the NFL, Rush would fail.

        It could be kind of funny. In radio, 3 million angry white people can make him rich. Remember, the 20 million listeners he claims in the ratings is a weekly cumulative number...the same 3 million, 5 days a week=21 million.

        But in the NFL, the market has different players. Its a 70% black audience where few will believe him when he says he's not a racist.

        I hope he does a parody that includes Jeremiah Wright saying "your chickens have come home... to roost1'
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 9:03 am ET)
            2
          "But in the NFL, the market has different players. Its a 70% black audience where few will believe him when he says he's not a racist."

          70% black audience? I'd say you need some affirmative action.......
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Tiredog (October 15, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
             
          Ummm...3 million five days a week equals 15 million, not 21 million. That would be if rush were on seven days a week...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jpcapone (October 14, 2009 11:17 am ET)
      6 1
      i can't believe people are actually coming here, to this board, to defend a pill popping, racist, neo con zealot. if you like limbo so much stop wasting your time here and go listen to his pod casts till his live show comes on then listen to that. go listen to your wannabe republican mouthpiece who is the exact incarnate reflection of what is wrong with the republican party. you guys lost, keep whining it looks good on you guys. funny part is that with all this whining and nit picking at obama you are basically assuring he will win again. you guys are better than cheer leaders. oh wait, thats what you are
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ILikePizza (October 14, 2009 11:52 am ET)
      9 1
      While playing word association during his interview on the Today Show, Rush called Sarah Palin misunderstood and underestimated, a woman who needed four different colleges and five years to get her communications degree, and who quit as governor because by all accounts it was too much work. He said of Michelle Obama, a cum laude graduate of Princeton, and a law degree from Harvard, that she should "garden".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (October 14, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
        6 2
        yeah yeah but its not racism ..its uh uh.. what's the new one? ..racial chauvinism....amazing how people keep trying to put lipstick on that same old racism pig!!!It's still a pig wallowing in the mud and worse!!!!

        Rush is both a racist and a pig..and is indefensible....there are no excuses for the many,many well documented racist/racial things he has said for years..no one is exaggerating his level of racist behavior..He just doesn't seem to get it......
        BTW...Apologies to pigs everywhere 'cause they don't have radio shows!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donkie (October 14, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
      2 11
      I love it! Without your great articles about conservative media figures, most of the liberal audience out there would never listen or read comments by Rush or Hannity! Keep up the good work! They'll come around eventually!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (October 14, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
        7 2
        I just LOVE that you're here to spread the love!!! We just love the Limbaugh and Beck. They are just so cool and honest and fair & all. Thanx.

        * I just love telling you that all us "liberals" include quite a few libertarians, conservatives & other human beings who think Limbaugh & Beck are tools....and using labels like that are really a lazy way of dismissing cogent reason and acute observation.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
        9 1
        Yes, because there's nothing that's as persuasive to liberals as a steady stream of falsehoods, partisan generalizations and bigotry from right-wing blowhards. It's a marvel that this entire site hasn't become a shrine to these clowns, really.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pauloakenfold03 (October 14, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
      2 13
      How many of you have listened to Rush's program before?? I encourage you all to listen to a full 3 hour show one day and THEN you'll understand the entire context of what he's saying. If you read what bloggers and so-called "journalists" SAY he said, you have no business commenting about him.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
        6 2
        So it takes three hours of listening to understand something he says? That's remarkable. Seriously, context is important, but there has to be some conceivable way that context would make a difference. Take the "reparations" comment listed above. That's pretty clear, and it's difficult to imagine what context is going to change the meaning of that, unless he preceded it with "I'd have to be a total jackass to say..."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (October 15, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
            1
          There's a term out there that some people understand. It's called hyperbole.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (October 15, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
               
            The problem with that is that there isn't any evidence that anything is motivated by a desire for reparations. It's clear race-baiting whether intended as exaggeration or not.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Lord of Light (October 14, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
        5 2
        I have listened to entire programs -- many times. So what? He recycles the same stupid arguments over and over.

        And speaking of arguments, the wholly idiotic one that you and Rush make -- "You have to listen to an entire program/week/month/year to understand me" -- is pure nonsense. First off, when Rush criticizes journalists, has he listened to entire broadcasts or programs or read everything they've done for the past year? Nope. Nor should he or anyone else be required to.

        Second, quotes like those above don't need "context." They're disgusting in and of themselves. It's like saying we shouldn't denounce racist statements by white supremacists without reading their manifestos.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by robrob (October 14, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
          8 2
          Full, verbatim, and in context quotes aren't good enough - you have to be indoctrinated three hours a day to "understand" Rush?

          Sounds like a cult to me.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:41 am ET)
            2  
            That's what Rush says all the time on his show and look at that, His minions repeat exactly what what he says to us.

            These are not quotes taken out of context a la Homer Simpson's "So I...Grabbed...Her... Sweet... Sweet...Can."
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 14, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
        5 1
        I listen to him all the time . . . I understand his context. He's a hateful, mean-spirited, bigoted, racist, sexist, phony bag of wind. I also listen to Beck and have for years. Shoot, I even listen to Savage.

        If you are listening to them thinking you are listening to conservative thought, you are not a conservative.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (October 14, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
          1 8
          bintx, so please tell us whom the real conservatives are in government, since you are so wise. Then, tell us what Conservatives beleive in as well, I am waiting for your wisdom.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 15, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
               
            mark, tell us whether or not you still believe that no programs instituted by FDR are still in existence today.

            Tell us whether or not you think Arabs played any part in the development of mathematics.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Boxer1979 (October 14, 2009 7:57 pm ET)
        6 1
        I think I would need the radio near the toilet, so I can puke from all the BS he spreads.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by swift (October 15, 2009 3:58 am ET)
        2  
        I first tuned into Rush in 1991 or so, and I listened to him like you stare at a cobra; with revulsion. Here was a guy like Father Coughlin, or Westbrook Pegler, a perfect demagogue. I was amazed to hear him say, the day after the Clinton election, that this was "America Held Hostage, Day 1."

        So I've listened to him, as much as I can stand, for almost twenty years. He's a pestilence in American politics, but I'm sure you don't agree. I've never heard him tell a joke that was actually funny. It's hard for us to get the joke, since we're liberals, the Juden in Limbaugh's world-view. Sorry if we don't get what's funny in his speeches.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:43 am ET)
          2  
          I gave up in 1991 because he was boring and repetitive. He hasn't change much other than the names of people he attacks.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (October 14, 2009 2:21 pm ET)
      2 9
      I would like to say, I think MMFA is a racist website. They only attack white commentators on their website. They must hate white folks.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
        6 1
        Is this supposed to be analogous to something MMfA said? Or is it supposed to be an actual argument, ignoring people like Juan Williams and Thomas Sowell, and the obvious fact that there aren't a lot of minorities who are likely to spout/allow conservative misinformation?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (October 14, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
          2 8
          MMFA really only tries to expose those that are white, if you look at their website on a daily basis, they always show pictures of the white commentators. Sure every so often the may talk about Juan Williams, but majority of their attacks seem to only be white, why is that? Seems to be a racist!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (October 14, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
            6 1
            Is it possible that the vast majority of inflammatory or false comments happen to come from white people? If so, then is MMfA supposed to manufacture quotes from black people or just shut down entirely to avoid being perceived as "racist"?

            I'm really not sure where you think you're going here, and I suspect you really don't either.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Boxer1979 (October 14, 2009 7:59 pm ET)
              3 2
              Trolls have no brains remember?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:45 am ET)
                 
              Yeah, Don't look at the mainstream media of the present to get the misinformation. Find an obscure publication form thirty years ago and brand the opposing side with it like the right wing does.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by swift (October 15, 2009 3:51 am ET)
          3  
          I almost always disagree with Sowell, and sometimes with Williams. I've never had my race impugned by either of them. Sowell is a conservative, but he never uses terms like "feminazi," nor does he call Obama an "affirmative action president." Like or dislike him, but you have to understand that Obama is a very, very bright guy. To try to say he's not certainly makes me think there's an underlying racism in the observer. Remember the last debate with McCain? Who came across to the public as competent, calm and smart? The answer came a few days later in the vote.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Alone in Texas (October 14, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
      2 1
      What I also found interesting about the interview is how angry he comes across on TV. Watch his face as he speaks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jurgan (October 14, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
         
      This has been said already, but: It's funny, I agree with almost every word of that first Limbaugh excerpt. If I read that alone, I'd think, "man, this guy makes a lot of sense." But then compare it to the rest of what he said...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AB-001 (October 14, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
      2 1
      I seriously wonder if Limbaugh consents to interviews only if there is an agreement to not quote or play "in context" any of his racially charged remarks. No one in any of his sit-downs ever does this; if I were the interviewer I certainly would!

      We know Fox will never do it, but I was a little perturbed that none of his race remarks or repeated references to sodomy were brought up by the NBC interviewer. That's when it struck me that there must be some sort of agreement

      If you haven't seen it yet, check out Olberman's deconstruction of the Limbaugh interview. A classic!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 10:48 am ET)
        2  
        He lost weight and wants to appear on TV to show it off. He did this in the mid 90's. Remember the sitcoms he appeared on? He's an egomaniac who is vain but stuck looking and weighing like he does. Every once in awhile he'll come out of his gated bunker to show himself to the world. Plus Glenn Beck is getting all the attention now.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by giantslor (October 14, 2009 8:12 pm ET)
      2  
      You forgot to mention that Limbaugh often makes fun of black people by saying "axed" instead of "asked."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blesscurse (October 14, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
      3 1
      Bill O'Reilly's crack research team - "the best in the business" -only looked for two dubiously sourced quotes, and could not find any of the ones listed above. What a surprise.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zxcvbnm, (October 14, 2009 11:09 pm ET)
      1  
      To MiddeLeft who says:
      People who are racist are last to recognize it.

      So wrong!!!!
      People who are racist are the first to paint someone else as one.

      Evidence is all around, especially in your statement, just open you colorblind eyes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brendalott (October 14, 2009 11:35 pm ET)
      1  
      Rush is the coward; He even had his Latino housekeeper procure his hillbilly heroin. Couldn't even handle his own drug deals.

      Take your pick from the definitions below for the "what is Rush" contest; there is no wrong answer.

      By the way, for you ditto heads, here is the definition of a racism:
      rac⋅ism  /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
      Use racist in a Sentence
      See web results for racist
      See images of racist
      –noun 1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
      2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
      3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.


      Definition of "Bigot:

      big⋅ot  /ˈbɪgət/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [big-uht] Show IPA
      Use bigot in a Sentence
      See web results for bigot
      See images of bigot
      –noun a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.




      Report Abuse
    • Author by swift (October 15, 2009 3:46 am ET)
      2 1
      To decide whether Rush is a racist, first you define racist. He's not racist like the neo-Nazis or stormfront, or at least he hides it if he is. He says he's color-blind. But the enormous weight of these quotes points to a very twisted view of race, at least, and a great deal of coded speak. The truth is, the greatest hatred of Rush's life is liberalism, and we have to question why he is so vituperative about that. I suspect he is, like all revanchist reactionaries, he wants a return to the good old days, when women were in the home and blacks had menial jobs and didn't bother people like him.

      He says he wants to sue about all this. Well, good luck, Rush. Libel and slander is just about impossible to prove for a public figure who is so familiar and so hated by millions. And the other fact is, the truth is an absolute defense.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CitizenX (October 15, 2009 7:46 am ET)
      2 3
      For those of you who love ignorance and worship blogs. Gratz, Rush is out of the running.

      FYI: "Magic Negro" was created and published first in the LA Times, March 19, 2007.

      http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,3391015.story

      not by Rush Limbaugh. He commented on the incredulity of it and used it in satire. He always recited the LA Times for it. There's some fact checking for you.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 10:20 am ET)
          1
        And thats proof enough for you? You need to do more than fact check.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CitizenX (October 15, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
          1 3
          LOL, when facts are inconvenient resort to ad hominems and disbelief. You've proven my point.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
              1
            Facts concerning what that Rush is not a racist and makes racially charged statements? Your fact check hardly disproves that and if you believe it does you need more than a fact check you need a brain. You've just proved my point.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by CitizenX (October 16, 2009 8:35 am ET)
                1
              And to top it all off, Snachez at CNN just admitted he lied about Rush's quotes. Oh yeah, what was that I said about ad hominems when you have no facts to back up your opinion. You've done it again.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by SteveC (October 16, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
           
        Rush Limbaugh and his supporters frequently try to hide their racism behind the limp excuse that "it's only satire, people". Uh, I see.

        Satire: "the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc."

        So, they're using irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding the vice and folly of being blacks, "halfricans", and "injuns". How wonderfully clever of them.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 9:37 am ET)
      2 1
      More than anything, The right wing this year has set a standard for what a racist is. And it's very low. Say the word "typical" and you're a racist. Say "Wise Latina" and you're a racist by their own standards. So by the examples you cited, they would be the grand wizards of the KKK by their own standards.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by VJay912 (October 15, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
        2
      This is insanity. There's nothing racially charged in any of this! FYI you ARE allowed to say black in a sentence. What a bunch of narrow-minded hateful people here.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SteveC (October 16, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
        1  
        Racially: Relating to race.

        Charged: Tense and causing anxiety, excitement, or anger.

        Uh, nothing racially charged in anything Rush has said? Really? Me thinks you have blinders on.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.