About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly ignores Limbaugh's history of racially charged remarks in claiming McNabb comments are "only thing we can find"

October 16, 2009 8:27 pm ET — 59 Comments

Discussing the controversy that erupted around Rush Limbaugh's failed bid to become part owner of the St. Louis Rams, Fox host Bill O'Reilly claimed "[f]air-minded Americans know that playing the race card is easy and hateful. The only thing we can find about Rush Limbaugh is that he thinks quarterback Donovan McNabb is overrated by some people who want black quarterbacks to succeed." But contrary to O'Reilly's claim that the "only" racially charged or insensitive remark that Limbaugh has made is about McNabb, Media Matters for America has documented numerous such remarks, including his comments that "[w]e are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black" and that "Obama's entire economic program is reparations."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Looking for "evidence that Limbaugh is a race-baiter," O'Reilly claimed "only thing we can find" are his McNabb remarks

O'Reilly characterizes McNabb remark as "only" evidence against Rush. As Media Matters has documented, Limbaugh resigned from a brief 2003 stint as a commentator on ESPN's Sunday NFL Countdown after he made remarks about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb that ESPN called "insensitive and inappropriate."

From the October 15 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: So what's the evidence that Limbaugh is a race-baiter? We investigated the statements that are being tossed about. The first one allegedly has Mr. Limbaugh praising James Earl Ray, convicted of assassinating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. There's no evidence that Rush Limbaugh ever did that. The accusation comes from a far-left guy named Jack Huberman, who provided no evidence to back up the claim. Huberman is also the source for Limbaugh's alleged quote saying slavery was not entirely bad. Again, Huberman provided no backup. The allegation was also published on Wikipedia without any sourcing whatsoever. Mr. Limbaugh denies making both comments.

Finally, a Kansas City Star columnist named James Fussell quoted Limbaugh as saying bad things about the NAACP. The quote came from a newsletter called "Flush Rush." But so far, there's no confirmation the disparaging remarks, again, were ever made.

So what we have here are accusations without merit. But in our hypermedia age, that's enough to paint someone as a racist.

Now, I've been through this. A couple years ago, I said on the radio that having dinner in Harlem at Sylvia's Restaurant was the same as having dinner anywhere in America. The context was my grandmother, who was very afraid of blacks, even though she never even met a black person. Her fear was irrational. And I made that point quite clearly.

But the vicious website Media Matters put forth I was denigrating a black-owned restaurant. And some people actually believed it without even listening to the radio broadcast, which I posted on billoreilly.com so everybody could hear it. Well, there goes my NFL career.

Fair-minded Americans know that playing the race card is easy and hateful. The only thing we can find about Rush Limbaugh is that he thinks quarterback Donovan McNabb is overrated by some people who want black quarterbacks to succeed. Mr. McNabb resented the remark, as he should have. He's a good player, and his color has nothing to do with his performance. I think Limbaugh made a mistake with that analysis.

But that doesn't make him a racist and should not disqualify him from owning part of a team. We've got to stop the racial witch-hunting in America.

O'Reilly: "We have the best research staff in the business." Referencing the work of The O'Reilly Factor research staff during a segment about the controversy around Limbaugh's failed bid for the Rams, O'Reilly claimed that "[w]e have the best research staff in the business, the best. There is nobody better at researching than The Factor." (The O'Reilly Factor, 10/14/2009, retrieved from the Nexis database)

Media Matters has documented at least 28 examples of Limbaugh making racially charged remarks

Limbaugh has an extensive history of making racially charged remarks about minorities. Media Matters has documented numerous examples of Limbaugh's racially charged and insensitive remarks about minorities, including his comment that "in Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering" [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 9/15/09] and that "Obama's entire economic program is reparations" [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/22/09]. Examples include:

O'Reilly again falsely claimed Media Matters distorted his Sylvia's comments

In fact, Media Matters provided audio and transcript -- in context -- of O'Reilly's relevant comments. Contrary to O'Reilly's claim that Media Matters distorted his 2007 comments about his dinner at Sylvia's restaurant, Media Matters provided accurate audio and transcript of O'Reilly's relevant comments in context.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (October 16, 2009 8:39 pm ET)
      8 1
      LOL... What do you expect from Bill O'Reilly? This is the guy who was surprised that black folks dressed up nice to go to their restaurant in Harlem...and not one of them yelled for "more M-F'ing ice tea". All of those Limbaugh incidents MMFA listed above...O'Reilly doesn't find racist overtones in one of them. Doh...! O'Reilly is clueless. That's why he's on FOX...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (October 16, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
        3 3
        "O'Reilly the Tiller Killer" What a wonderful claim to Fame.
        He cares about Rush Limbaugh's rights, but with Dr. Tiller he has no Shame?
        He Symbolically takes a bath in Dr. Tiller's Blood.
        In some kind of Evil Religous Cleansing that does no justice to Noah's Flood.

        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bad News (October 16, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
          3 3
          News Corp. "A Racist Enterprise"
          "O'Reilly the Tiller Killer" or "Hannity the Mis-informer" Which one of these is the True Champion of telling Lies?
          They both use Mark Furman a proven Racist & Perjuror from O.J.'s Murder Case.
          Each time Fox News puts Mark Furman on the air they are spitting in every African American's Face.

          Speak truth to power.


          Mr. News
          Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (October 16, 2009 8:49 pm ET)
      8 1
      At FOX NEWS, "fact" is a 4-letter word...

      Yesterday, I noticed how BO started his cavalcade of bullschidt with some really off-the-wall items about Dittodick that I'd never heard before.

      It would probably make BO's eyes bleed, but if he searched this site (or many others) he'd find a whole lotta verbatim, in-context quotes demonstrating Rush's bigotry.

      But that would be something a real journalist does.

      If Edward R. Murrow came back and saw what was being passed off for journalism at FOX NEWS, he'd never stop throwing up.


      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tiredog (October 19, 2009 10:36 am ET)
        3  
        Billo's "crack investigation team" must be investigating that very thing: crack.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by usp (October 16, 2009 8:53 pm ET)
      3  
      he's been asleep right?

      wait, i thought he was looking out for me!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fairliberal (October 16, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
      2 15
      Fact, the comments that MMFA has posted are not racist, they are provocative for sure. No more so than much of the garbage spewed out by the likes of Springer , Garafalo and Franken on Air America. Remember them, they were failures, apparently they had no credibility.

      Notice also that MMFA does not include in their list the NAACP and James Earl Ray comments attributed to Limbaugh. That is tacit admission that they are a bogus charge.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (October 16, 2009 10:03 pm ET)
        7  
        Can you please explain Rush's fascination / overuse of the phrase 'bending over and grabbing ankles'? What does it mean?
        He seems to use it a lot.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (October 16, 2009 10:56 pm ET)
        8 1
        No and Yes...

        A "racist"?

        No. (There's only one race: the human race; therefore a "racist" would be one who promotes humanity thereby instantly disqualify Dittodick)

        A bigot?

        DING DING DING! We have a winner!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by benjr (October 17, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
        7  
        By using "fact" to start a sentence does not make your claim an actual fact. You can't prove that the comments posted on MMfa posted aren't racist, it's just your opinion. Clearly you are in the minority here, and to try to hide behind this statement, "Notice also that MMFA does not include in their list the NAACP and James Earl Ray comments attributed to Limbaugh. That is tacit admission that they are a bogus charge." is silly. I guess you can cherry pick the quotes you want, but anyone at all who's not a moron knows that Rush has been on the air for a very long time. To try to hide behind two quotes instead of looking at his entire body of work is intellectually dishonest. I notice that for his other quotes you just keep repeating that you do not find them to be racist. You can hold your own opinion, but again, it seems clear that many other people disagree. In this particular case the people who disagree are the people who matter (NFL players, executives, owners, etc). THEY think that Rush has a history of racism, and they don't want him to be associated with the league.
        Also, I notice that you don't respond to any of the twenty eight quotes MMfa has in this article. Are none of them racist either?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by grunt (October 19, 2009 9:38 am ET)
            4
          How about you PROVE they are racist. It isn't someone's job to prove they AREN'T racist. It is you job to prove they are. It is very apparent you all don't listen to rush. If you did, you would know that he is mocking other stories in the media when he says these things. Man, sheep will follow anything.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
            2  
            Tell me what story was Rush mocking when as a DJ told an Afro-American caller to take the bone out of your nose and call me back.
            Undocumented immigrants an invasive species is mocking what? Maybe you cant' see the racism in these examples(Courtesy of Craig):

            Limbaugh called illegal immigrants an "invasive species": We're supposed to bend over and grab the ankles and say, "Deal with it."

            Limbaugh: "Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, 'Have your way with me'" to African-Americans and gays

            Limbaugh: "Troopergate" investigation is "pure sexism," but Palin "didn't bend over and let" Alaska politicians "have their way"

            Limbaugh on Obama: "We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black"

            Limbaugh: Chrysler and GM have bent over and "grabbed their ankles" for Obama

            Limbaugh: "We get tarred and feathered as Nazis because we just don't bend over, grab the ankles"

            because of your own racism. Just sayin'.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grunt (October 19, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
                3
              You are suggesting I am racist if I read your post right. Sorry, you don't know me. I don't think that is a claim I could make. Do you have a copy of Rush telling the caller to take the ring out of his nose? How can you prove that is racism? Do only blacks wear nose rings?
              Are illegal aliens all one race? I believe there are illegal immigrants of all races. Maybe this is showing the left's own racism??? If you people were the least bit intelligent, you could understand the metaphor of what some people believe illegal immigrants do to our country.

              What does grabbing the ankles have to do with racism? You lost me there.

              Please, don't tell me you don't understand what Rush meant by, "...because his father was black." I'll give you a chance to think about it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
                2  
                Thats right I don't know you thats why i said that maybe you can't see Rush's racism because of your own, and the more i read of your post the more i'am convinced that that is the reason. It was not ring it was bone. Take the bone out of your nose and call me back. You call labeling people an invasive species intelligence is all I need to know about your intelligence.Thankyou for making my point about Rush only using metaphor to describe what some people believe. Just like some people believe that blacks are lazy and Obama is a socialist and was not born here,and that Latins are poisoning our culture. You've made my point for me.

                Please, don't tell me you don't understand what Rush meant by, "...because his father was black." I'll give you a chance to think about it.
                No I want YOU to explain it to me! What did he mean? I'am waiting...
                Report Abuse
                • Author by grunt (October 19, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
                    3
                  I want to hear your projectionist interpretation first. Let's read it. I promise I will respond with my interpretation.

                  Again, I ask, what does a bone in the nose have to do with black people? Again I ask, do you have a copy of Rush saying it?

                  Can you really not understand what Rush means by an invasive species? Think about how an invasive species would work to destroy a nation. Remember we aren't talking about immigrants. We are talking about illegal immigrants who come in all races. You still didn't describe to me how a comment about illegal immigrants equals racism, when we have illegal immigrants of all races flowing into the U.S.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
                    4  
                    Come on guy stop playing games.You want to hear my protectionist interpretation? What does that mean ? Do you feel that black people are being coddled? Is that what your're saying Rush was saying ? I'am still waiting for your non racial interpretation of Rush's statement. What do you think Rush was talking about when he said take the bone out of your nose to a Afro-american calller? And No I don't see undocumented human immigrants as part of an invading "Species." WTF!! And working to destroy the nation. I know some people look at them as non human a different species, a parasite and I know what happens when you denigrate other human beings and scapegoat them. That phrase itself says more about YOU and why you won't see Rush's racism more than anything i could say. You can continue to evade my questions but it's becoming increasingly clear why you won't answer them.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by grunt (October 19, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
                        2
                      Protectionist? Try reading what I said again. "ProJectionist" is the word I used.

                      Congero, find me the script or copy of Rush telling the caller to take the bone out. If you can, I will answer your question. I'm not going to accpet the premise without some evidence of the quote taking place. And no, you can't use MMFA as the reference.

                      Also, please find the invasive species comment. What do you think about all of the "terrorist" who are coming into our country illegally? Would they not be something that wants to slowly, under-the-radar, come in and destroy our country? Essentially making them like an invasive species (think "War of the World's"). You still haven't told me why that comment would be racist. You keep ignoring basic points to my argument. Are there not multiple races and ethnicities represented in the illegal immigrants flooding our unsecured borders?

                      Why won't you tell me why it was a racist statement (Obama's father being black quote)? Tell me your interpretation. What's wrong? MMFA didn't tell you the interpretation? They just told you to be outraged, and it was racism!!! Yet you try just to fail miserably.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 19, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
                2  
                Rush ... told an Afro-American caller to take the bone out of your nose

                Do you have a copy of Rush telling the caller to take the ring out of his nose? How can you prove that is racism? Do only blacks wear nose rings?

                You may need more help than you can get here, Grunt. Maybe change your screen name to "Baa-a-a-a-" as well.

                And congratulations, you're the second dittohead on this thread to "explain" Rush's remarks by saying that everybody should "understand" it. Step up there, sport. Pretend we're all really ignorant, blank slates. Explain.

                You think maybe these buzzwords and codes that Rush uses to hypnotize and excite you sheep don't really stand up to analysis?

                Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (October 17, 2009 9:07 pm ET)
        7  
        Notice also that MMFA does not include in their list the NAACP and James Earl Ray comments attributed to Limbaugh. That is tacit admission that they are a bogus charge.

        It is not a tacit admission of anything. MMFA has plenty of ammunition without resorting to providing quotes that are in dispute, but nonetheless may be true. It is not worth arguing about when compared to the undeniable numerous examples of blatant race-baiting by Limbaugh.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 18, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
          7  
          open-mind, I'm to the point where I skip by most of Faillib's comments as she's recently degenerated to a point where her earlier posts seem sane, but I'm glad you made me notice this one. It is a hall-of-famer.

          Let's think about this. The disputed quotes mentioned, as far as I know, have not been widely used. The only time I've seen them mentioned at this site was when MMFA linked to an article by somebody else that included the quotes, attributed them to the book they were pulled from, and included the note that they were not verified.

          I think somebody on a cable news channel used them, and added the correction later that they were not documented.

          And all of the wingnuts are insisting that none of the racist comments by Rush are racist, while obsessing over a couple of disputed quotes that have barely seen the light of day except to mention that they are not verified.

          So, MMFA does not include any of the disputed quotes, as they haven't been proved true (and it would be very difficult to prove that they were never said).

          And to the twisted wingnut mind, this is some sort of "gotcha", a "tacit admission" by this site that quotes they have never used are "bogus".

          The convoluted thinking that passes for right wing logic is amazing.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by fantagor (October 18, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
            4  
            Yes, by this specious logic, every quote MMfA has never used must therefore be an admission that that quote is falsely attributed, which means the fact that MMfA has never quoted, say, Socrates means everything attributed to him must be a fabrication. Same is true of Eisenhower, Kennedy, Ben Franklin, the Bee Gees, Kirk Hammett of Metallica...

            Randy
            Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (October 18, 2009 11:27 am ET)
        4  
        Irrelevant since there is so much racist,racial,racebaiting stuff on the list anyway..plus they didn't include the one I found most offensive and heard transcript of...when Limabaugh told a Black caller to take the bone out of his nose and call back later!!!!!Was that racist?..You betcha!!!
        I think they just used the shortlist..or most recent hits from the Big Druggie!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 18, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
        6  
        Fact, the comments that MMFA has posted are not racist (Failylib)


        Really? That's a fact? Can I borrow your Racist dictionary, I need to know the alternate meaning of "fact" that you're using.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (October 18, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
          3  
          Commode Boy found those "facts" in the Racist Business Review.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (October 18, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
        5  
        Yep, it's not racism till there's a person swinging from a tree or a cross burning on a lawn, and a bunch of guys in white sheets and hoods are featured prominently.

        Randy
        Report Abuse
    • Author by clams casino (October 17, 2009 12:15 am ET)
      11 1
      Just as an aside, it's really beginning to irritate me that O'Reilly characterizes anything that comes out his or any other blowhard's mouth as "analysis."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (October 17, 2009 1:31 am ET)
          12
        Who cares what irritates you. But just out of curiosity, do you include Olbermann on that list of blowhards?

        I guess you just don't like when his analysis disproves what you want to believe.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NewBee (October 17, 2009 6:24 am ET)
          9  
          But just out of curiosity, do you include Olbermann on that list of blowhards?
          No
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (October 17, 2009 9:12 am ET)
          9  
          I guess you just don't like when his analysis disproves what you want to believe. - fairliberal

          I'll let you know if you're right the first time it happens.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by clams casino (October 17, 2009 5:18 pm ET)
          9 1
          I was pointing out an annoying trope used repeatedly by O'Reilly. Does O'Reilly use the word when talking about Olbermann? No. Does Olbermann repeatedly abuse the word "analysis"? No. Your question makes no sense. But it's nice to know that you care.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 18, 2009 1:09 pm ET)
            6  
            Does O'Reilly use the word when talking about Olbermann?


            As far as I know, BilldO won't mention Olbermann's name.He's afraid one of his Factor Fans who doesn't have every channel except Fox blocked might check out Countdown and see O'Reilly exposed as the moron he is.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (October 17, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
        9  
        Right-Wing Pundits: putting the Anal in Analysis.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (October 17, 2009 3:43 am ET)
      10  
      guess you just don't like when his analysis disproves what you want to believe.


      so far, that hasn't been a problem i've encountered with mr. o'reilly.

      i guess, because limbaugh, o'reilly, hannity, et al, style themselves as "entertainers", nothing they say qualifies as racist cant, because, they're just being "entertaining".

      i expect we'll be seeing mr. limbaugh in black-face soon, just to prove what an un-racist he is.

      of course, the bottom line is this:

      a bunch of whiny, rich white guys decided they didn't want another whiny, rich white guy to join their club. i believe that's what's known as the "right of free association".

      i should think mr. limbaugh would be proud that these guys exercised their constitutional right to have nothing to do him.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MPellegrino (October 18, 2009 11:52 am ET)
          4
        There is just a fundamental difference between the media/liberals and conservatives/independents as to what racism is. I don't read those Limbaugh comments as racist; plenty of you do, and this is a much bigger deal than, I think, most understand. We are a very divided nation that is becoming more so with each passing day. Our only hope was for a man like President Obama to come along and work to unite - but instead he's chosen the path of polarization (which I do not condemn him for; I understand that he has to follow what he believes). Unfortunately, that path will prove perilous and America will continue to die a painful death.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by clams casino (October 19, 2009 12:01 am ET)
          7  
          Oh, so Obama chose a path of polarization, and not the thousands of braying idiots calling for his head on a daily basis or the puppet masters who work them into a frenzy with lies and hate? Got it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 19, 2009 1:04 am ET)
            5  
            Come on, Clams, were you expecting some reality-based insight from somebody who grouped liberals with the media and conservatives with independents in the first sentence?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MPellegrino (October 19, 2009 7:31 am ET)
                4
              Col, I know you mean your comments as dismissive, and probably aren't looking for a response, but I find your phrase "reality-based insight" very interesting. My minimal insight is based in nothing but reality, nothing but what I've experienced in speaking with friends, enemies, and colleagues on the topic of race. For example, I live and work in Boston, MA and have spoken to probably 50-75 people of varied ethnicity about the Gates/Crowley situation (it was a very hot topic around here for a while). Not one person believed it to be a situation of racial bias, and I'd estimate that 3/4 believed Dr. Gates to be acting very inappropriately. Yet, you wouldn't know that to watch the national news coverage on the situation.

              CNN, FoxNews, NBC - they are the ones with insight not based in the reality of everyday Americans.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
                2  
                Very scientific study...hahaha...hey what did they think of the O.J. trail? Your hilarious dude...Obama choose the path of polarization? What because commented in the Gates case. Must we really go over this again? Do you not see the bias in your own statement and the question you used to come up with your analysis, and how thinking people would think that insane to use information gathered in such a bias and unscientific manner?
                Guess what I've done my own poll and found that most people think what you just said is BS and your thinking meglomaniacal. See how that works? If thats the only example you have of the President dividing the country you got nothing. You got your head so far up your arse you can't see the light.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 19, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
                  3  
                  See, Congero, the problem is you're probably watching the national news coverage, or even worse, looking at the facts and forming your own opinions based on experience and common sense.

                  MPellegrino has gone scientific, surveying 50-75 of his acquaintances, who unanimously saw race as having nothing to do with the Gates incident.

                  There's probably a fairly big margin of error in his poll, as it can be hard to hear the responses clearly through the hoods..

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MPellegrino (October 19, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
                      1
                    Okay guys, I appreciate your perspective; we just see the world differently. I honestly hope that the President succeeds in bringing the country closer togther idealistically while also ensuring we don't fail economically, and I hope that people with passionate views always have a place to voice them. Even passion I don't agree with is a good sign for the future strength of our shared nation.

                    And I hope Congero eventually learns to spell and punctuate properly. See, insults are easy and can be fun!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
                      1  
                      I'am posting on a blog not doing an english term paper. I'am less concerned about my speeling or grammar and more concerned about getting my thoughts over in manner that can be understood. You seemed to get them. Your post was an insult to my intelligence and posted such, pointing out what i thought was foolish about it. You want to point out grammar and spelling...Zzzzzzzzzzzz! Another thing don't come here prejudging and assigning labels acting like you have some devine knowledge us the media/liberals need to hear from you. whatever you got you brought it on yourself.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
                    2  
                    We're always the idiots because we won't just accept their ridiculousness. I'am reading more of that kind of response from these guys lately.They either start trying to convince you of how smart they are by talking about their degrees or quoting Ayn Rand(sp)or somebody else,or they just call you an idiot because you don't hear voices or see bogeymen under the bed. I like it when stark criticizes my grammer as juvenile while his thoughts and idea are on the level of a pre-schooler. What are you going to do? :-)
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (October 19, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
                    1  
                    What I tell you.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by MPellegrino (October 19, 2009 6:56 am ET)
              4
            No, Clams, the thousands of braying idiots chose polarization as well. But here's the rub - they aren't the President.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by steveb (October 18, 2009 8:13 am ET)
      4  
      Limbaugh's most egregious race-baiting is his coining of a new euphemism, referring to President Obama as "the little black manchild." Of course, another term for "manchild" is..."boy"!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (October 19, 2009 12:03 am ET)
        5  
        And where's the quote in support of segregated buses? That's another recent classic.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Baffled by Hate (October 18, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
        6
      "Racially charged" is not the same as "racist," and I wouldn't even call those quote racially charged. Limbaugh does serious political commentary combined with satiric/comedic commentary. I looked through the various "racially charged" quotes above, and there is not a one of them from which I would suspect Rush is racist. Most are plain, objective statements of fact, such as the Gates issue "Here you have a black president trying to destroy a white policeman." That is exactly what happened. Why is recognizing it "racially charged?" I find all the people extolling the wonder of "our first black president" to be extremely racist, and even worse, the idea that because he is black, he can do no wrong. No, this isn't about race, it's about whiny liberals.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (October 19, 2009 12:08 am ET)
        6  
        So celebrating the milestone of electing a black president is "extremely racist," but not a single one of the above quotes is even "racially charged." I'm afraid that tells us more about you than it does about anything else.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (October 19, 2009 12:59 am ET)
        6  
        Most are plain, objective statements of fact, such as the Gates issue "Here you have a black president trying to destroy a white policeman."


        Wow, that is some top fuel delusion, Baffled. Are you being sarcastic, or do you seriously consider this a "statement of fact"?

        I guess if you believe Boss Hogg does serious political commentary or comedy, you'll believe anything.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.