Media echo GOP's fixation on size of House health care reform bill
Following the release of the House Democrats' health care reform bill, the leaders of the House Republican caucus repeatedly stressed the length and size of the bill during an October 29 press conference. Numerous media figures and outlets have followed in lockstep, with the Politico's Jonathan Allen asserting that the bill "comes out to about $2.24 million per word," and Sean Hannity claiming that "if you can't put this down in 30 pages or less, it proves that this is a complicated, you know, bunch of bureaucratic garbage."
House Republicans harp on length of House bill
Boehner issues statement on "Speaker Pelosi's 1,990-Page Government Takeover of Health Care." House Minority Leader John Boehner stated on October 29 that "[t]he fact that it weighs in at nearly 2,000 pages -- more than 620 pages longer than the government takeover of health care Hillary Clinton proposed in 1993 -- is as good an indication as any of just how costly and unsustainable Speaker Pelosi's proposal is."
Barton: "[T]hat's about four reams of paper." Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) stated at the October 29 Republican leadership press conference, "I would say, 1,990 pages -- that's about four reams of paper. I would say that the people getting reamed are the American people."
Pence: "[T]his legislation actually uses the word 'shall' 3,425 times." Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) stated during the press conference: "After weeks of backroom negotiations, now the Democrats have emerged with a bill that isn't a thousand pages; it's 1,990 pages. It isn't just the mandates included in the last bill, but this legislation actually uses the world 'shall' 3,425 times. The American people don't want to see a mountain range of taxes and mandates and debt burdened on this generation and the next."
Blunt: "I've sponsored nine bills ... I don't think any of them are 100 pages long." Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO) stated during the press conference that "one of the things we heard, beginning with the 1,056-page stimulus bill, is let's see what's in the bill. Let's talk about what's in the bill. And Republicans have a lot of -- a lot of bills out there. I don't think any of the -- I've sponsored nine bills, nine different bills. I don't think any of them are 100 pages long." He later added, " 'Shall' over 3,000 times sounds like a pretty significant government intervention in health care."
Cantor: Do the people believe this "nearly 2,000-page bill is not going to explode the federal deficit? I don't think so." Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) stated at the press conference, "Do the American people really believe this bill -- this nearly 2,000-page bill -- is not going to explode the federal deficit? I don't think so." As he spoke, Cantor held up the bill.
Media parrot House GOP talking points on size of bill
Politico does entire story on physical appearance of the bill. In an article headlined, "House health bill clocks in at 1,990 pages," Politico writer Jonathan Allen wrote, "It runs more pages than War and Peace, has nearly five times as many words as the Torah, and its tables of contents alone run far longer than this story." Allen added, "The House health care bill unveiled Thursday clocks in at 1,990 pages and about 400,000 words. With an estimated 10-year cost of $894 billion, that comes out to about $2.24 million per word." He further reported Republican concerns about the weight and height of the bill. [Politico, 10/29/09]
Hannity: "[I]f you can't put this down in 30 pages or less, it proves that this is a complicated, you know, bunch of bureaucratic garbage." Fox News host Sean Hannity stated of the bill, a copy of which he had on set, "My gosh, I could work out with this." He added, "Nineteen hundred pages. That -- if you can't put this down in 30 pages or less, it proves that this is a complicated, you know, bunch of bureaucratic garbage." During the program, conservative columnist S.E. Cupp stated of the bill, "It's longer than War and Peace. It's longer than Atlas Shrugged. And it's longer than Les Mis."
Drudge Report: "$2.2M A WORD." With the headline, "$2.2M A WORD," the Drudge Report highlighted Allen's Politico article. Drudge also featured the headline, "Pelosi's biggest one yet! 1,990 pages," which linked to a Politico blog post that did not mention the length of the bill but reported on "[a]n anti-Pelosi activist" who called Pelosi a Nazi. A third Drudge link stated, "Boehner: '1,990 Pages of Bureaucracy,' " and linked to a clip of Boehner's press conference. The following headlines were posted on the Drudge Report on October 30:
Dobbs: "Pelosi's massive government takeover of the health care system -- here it is, 1,990 pages of it." CNN host Lou Dobbs stated, "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's massive government takeover of the health care system -- here it is, 1,990 pages of it, at least $1 trillion, and that's the first estimate." He had on set copies of the House and Senate Finance Committee bills and later added, "I think it's really important we be straightforward and honest with everyone watching us right now and listening to us. This is 1,000 -- if we can show this -- 1,992 pages. This is House Bill 3962. This is Senate 1796. It is -- it's crazy. This is 1,502 pages here under my left hand."
Cafferty: "Look at that thing. ... [Y]ou need a truss just to carry that out of the office." Jack Cafferty stated on CNN's The Situation Room, "It's 2,000 pages long. And that's the one in the House. They've got another one -- there's John Boehner with a copy of that legislation. Look at that thing. You could hardly -- you need a truss just to carry that out of the office." He added that "the original legislation creating Social Security -- it was called the 1935 Economic Security Act. It was 64 pages long. The question this hour is -- we'll have more on this, by the way, tomorrow. We're working on a little something."
Fox & Friends hosts four reams of blank paper. Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy had a crew member carry a stack of paper on set and stated of the House bill, "It's 1,990 pages. We have not printed it out, because we didn't want to go through a couple of printers. But it is effectively four reams of paper. It weighs 20 pounds. It's a foot tall. ... Extraordinarily, with the 400,000 words -- I think it was Politico that averaged it costs us $2.2 million per word what's in this thing." Guest host Alyson Camerota also stated, "How can you lift this?" and later added, "Unbelievable the price tag and the reams of paper that are clearly killing some rain forest somewhere."
NY Post "editorial," "2,000 pages of ObamaCare costs," is just a Boehner quote. The New York Post published an editorial titled, "2,000 pages of ObamaCare costs." However, the "editorial" consisted of a photo of Pelosi and a quote from Boehner stating, in part, that "[t]he fact that it weighs in at nearly 2,000 pages -- more than 620 pages longer than the government takeover of health care Hillary Clinton proposed in 1993 -- is as good an indication as any of just how costly and unsustainable Speaker Pelosi's proposal is." [New York Post, 10/30/09] From the New York Post on October 30:
Charles Hurt: "[B]ill uses the word 'shall' 3,425 times." In a New York Post column, Charles Hurt echoed Pence, writing: "At nearly 2,000 pages, this latest bill uses the word 'shall' 3,425 times. In other words, it's just another massive bill where the feds tell people what to do on every page." [New York Post, 10/30/09]
Mr. News
Please Apologize to Andrea Mackris before your Nails & Teeth start to grow and your Hair gives a great Fright?
If you Apologize "The Poet" will stand by your side no matter how bad the Smell.
I'm willing to go even Farther & Stand with You, Rupert Murdoch & Roger Ailes & give the Rebel Yell.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
Fine, Hannity, let's reduce it to 30 pages. They'll generalize...and then leave EVERYTHING open to interpretation. Thus, having a bill with gaping holes in it. How's that for you, Hannity? Oh, right. Then you'll be complaining that it has holes in it.
My God, these people are idiots!
Given the samples we see here of the discourse in the media, it is still pretty depressing.
Do they actually read it from the printing copy? (rethorical)
Do they ever know what a PDF file is? (rethorical)
Of course it is hard to show these moronic comments using a memory stick.
What a waste in paper and in time.
Put in those terms, a couple thousand pages of paper seems inadequate to the garganutan task this bill is meant to accomplish.
People in their 50s will see a dramatic double-digit increase in their health insurance premiums. 214,000 Wisconsinites might want to know that their Medicare Advantage plan that they enjoy will be either dramatically more expensive or will go away completely.
The American taxpayer might want to know that government estimators are telling us that this bill will cost $1-2 trillion in a new health care entitlement, which will surely add more deficit and debt to future generations.
The shame of all of this, Mr. Speaker, is that we could fix whats broken in health care without breaking whats working in health care. Republicans have offered 40 different pieces of legislation in an attempt to get bipartisan compromise, to make sure that the uninsured get insured, that people with preexisting conditions get health care, and that we do this without breaking the bank, without raising taxes, creating new debt, new deficits, and new entitlements."
How come I have not seen this truth reported on MSNBC or any other "real news outlet"? Anyone?
Most, if not all of this "entitlement" will come from people paying into the system.
What's the value of avoiding thousands of deaths and thousands more bankruptcies?
Bureaucratic garbage that's a nice way of describing it
It's similar to court rulings - those are often pages long to provide info about how the decision was reached when the summary of the decision is one or two paragraphs at the end.
And the reason they 'care' now? Because they want to frighten people who are already afraid of 'big government'. How do you scare those people?
With threats of bigger government, so you say stuff like the "government option" instead of the "public option", which is the appropriate name. Public is the antonym of private, like a public pool instead of a private pool. One doesn't say that they're going swimming in a govt pool.
They scare people with visual depictions of how many pieces of paper are in this bill, even though that doesn't really tell anyone much of anything.
They exaggerate how much content is actually in those 2000 pages, and compare it to books that would take much longer to read straight through than this bill will. They do it to fearmonger.
If by nice you mean simpleminded, then I'd have to agree with you.
But let's do this: Can someone PLEASE track down the size of the Patriot Act or some other right-wing law and stop this madness? I did a quick search and apparently the Patriot Act is 304 pages. Hundreds of pages? It takes hundreds of pages to protect this country? Who can read a bill that is the size of a phone book? For god's sake it almost as big as a ream of paper. And so on.
But there must be a longer act.
And Campbell Brown, when on MSNBC did you see a host showing on camera a stack of blank paper to demonstrate how ridiculously long a right-wing bill was? I am guessing never. So, MSNBC and Fox are in fact different... one is fairly straight down the middle/accurate and the other is over-the-top sensationalistic/inaccurate. You got it?