Media conservatives try to resurrect "death panel" myth
Linking to an Associated Press article about Medicare coverage for voluntary end-of-life counseling in the House health care bill, conservative media outlets such as Fox News and BigGovernment.com have featured misleading headlines to revive the widely debunked "death panel" smear. Fox News' Peter Johnson Jr. also stated during an interview with Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), "So with regard to the death panel, nothing much has changed."
Fox & Friends, BigGovernment, FoxNews.com misleadingly refer to "death panels"
Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com runs headline, "AP: 'Death Panels' in Health Care Bill." On October 30, linking to an AP article titled, "It's alive! End-of-life counseling in health bill," conservative news outlet BigGovernment ran the misleading headline, "AP: 'Death Panels' in Health Care Bill":

FoxNews.com: " 'Death Panel' measure survives." FoxNews.com also used "death panel" terminology, linking to the AP article with the headline, " 'Death Panel' measure survives":

Fox & Friends' Peter Johnson Jr.: "With regard to the death panel, has anything changed?" On the October 30 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Johnson -- who has repeatedly fearmongered about end-of-life counseling -- asked Cornyn, "With regard to the death panel, has anything changed?" When Cornyn did not directly address the question, Johnson stated, "So with regard to the death panel, nothing much has changed." Cornyn responded, "Well, we haven't been able to read the bill in its entirety yet," and added that "when the government runs health care, it invariably rations health care, and of course we don't want government intervening in the kind of decisions that ought to be made by family on behalf of their loved ones."
In fact, the AP article reported that the provision covers voluntary counseling and never said that "death panels" were in the bill
AP headline actually stated, "It's alive! End-of-life counseling in health bill." The October 29 AP article contains only one reference to "death panels," attributing the language to former Gov. Sarah Palin. The AP reported, "The Medicare end-of-life planning provision that 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin said was tantamount to 'death panels' for seniors is staying in the latest Democratic health care bill unveiled Thursday." The AP further stated: "The legislation would allow Medicare to pay for a counseling session with a doctor or clinical professional once every five years. The bill calls for such sessions to be 'completely' voluntary, and prohibits the encouragement or promotion of suicide or assisted suicide. The counseling provision is supported by doctors' groups and AARP, the seniors' lobby."
Health care bill still does not contain death panels. Not only does the House health care bill not contain death panels, it does not make end-of-life counseling mandatory. From Section 1233, "Voluntary Advance Care Planning Consultation," of HR 3962:
CONSTRUCTION.--The voluntary advance care planning consultation described in section 1861(hhh) of the Social Security Act, as added by subsection (a), shall be completely optional. Nothing in this section shall --
(1) require an individual to complete an advance directive, an order for life sustaining treatment, or other advance care planning document;
(2) require an individual to consent to restrictions on the amount, duration, or scope of medical benefits an individual is entitled to receive under this title; or
(3) encourage the promotion of suicide or assisted suicide.
The media debunked the death panels -- more than 40 times over. Numerous media outlets have debunked right-wing claims that the House health care reform bill would encourage euthanasia of the elderly, including Palin's claim -- forwarded by the conservative media -- that the bill would create a "death panel" and the related claim -- initiated by Betsy McCaughey, who later walked back her claim -- that the bill would "absolutely require" that seniors on Medicare undergo end-of-life counseling "that will tell them how to end their life sooner." Indeed, Media Matters for America has identified more than 40 instances of media reporting that these claims are false.















"NOT"
Mr. News
Will you go on "Craig's List" & Contact that Special Someone to make your Halloween just Right?
Or will you call one of those "Adult Phone Sites" & let your Right hand Complete its Mission?
I guess it's the Curse of being Rich to have so many Kinky Decisions?
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
All 4 are well Educated (Well, Not On My Level) but JoeSixpack needs to layoff the Big Macks.
Because of my Jihad on Bill-O the Clown i don't have a lot of time to give these 4 Smurfs the attention they so Richly Deserve.
I leave you with this Warning, Be Very Careful (Unless You Want My Full & Absolute Clerihew Attention) that you don't get on "The Poet's" last Nerve.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
are running scared to take their words back
I am sad for I wanted to be Mr News for trick or treat
I thought the costume would be really neat
but the clerk at the store she ruined all of my fun
she said no one made a costume looking that dumb
Speak slowly to Mr. News, and use lots of pictures
You aren't a victim here - you're the culprit. You're the guilty party.
What's sad is that they had a real opportunity to contribute to America. To get involved in policy discussions, and balance the progressive voices spearheading this idea. To raise legitimate concerns, helping the bill that moved forward to be less expensive, more inclusive, and work even better for the American people in the end.
Instead, they chose to lie. And smear. And distort. And fear-monger. The Republicans chose not to represent the very people who had elected them, but rather to engage in pointless partisan bickering that, in the end, only comforted the very industry that is helping to destroy not only our health but our economy: private for-profit health insurance.
Hey, Republicans! It's not too late! You can still help, if you really have America's best interest at heart. There will be debate and further amendments from the floor of both the House and the Senate. You can still decide to join the rest of us in working towards something that a majority of the American people both want and need. Is Rush running in 2010? Is Beck? Let them continue on with their propaganda. You would be better served by looking ahead rather than following the lead of these circus clowns.
At the very least, you cannot now say that you were never warned.
Of course they would. If you don't have a plan to make sure every American has access to America's health care system, your best bet is to lie about what the other side is doing. That's what they do with every piece of legislation the Democrats are proposing.
Alan Grayson is absolutely right. The Conservatives have no answers other than their discredited old ways.
The GOP has held up this legislation since August, meaning 7,500 people (going by the 45,000 per year figure) have died since then because they lack health care insurance.
How much more blood will we allow the GOP to have on its collective hands?
They had no problem passing a health bill (Medicare Part B) that mostly benefited the health industries bottom line.
I ask all of the GOP congressional reps who espouse the virtues of allowing people to go beyond state lines to buy health insurance this question:
If this provision would benefit your state, why haven't you tried to influence those running your state to do this now?
This is a state rights issue. Correct? Exercise your rights and allow your residents to go outside state lines.
You don't need the federal government to get this for your state. If you're right, you will look good and it actually does something to help your constituents.
Hey, you can also use FOX News you help you twist the public debate in your favor about this. Go for it. Nothing is stopping you.
Did he keep his hands off a family issue when it came time to vote on the Terry Schiavo special bill.
BTW--The Republican-sponsored Schiavo Bill is the only one in US history where the Congress interfered directly with a "private family decision."
Republican principles is an oxymoron.