About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox News personalities aggressively promote Bachmann's protest against health care reform bill

November 05, 2009 7:57 am ET — 81 Comments

In recent days, following its pattern of advocacy, Fox News and its personalities' have repeatedly promoted Rep. Michele Bachmann's (R-MN) November 5 anti-health care reform protest, to be held on Capitol Hill and in the halls of Congress. Fox News has previously promoted numerous other rallies such as the April 15 tea party protests, health care town hall protests, and the 9-12 march on Washington.

Bachmann called for "House Call" protest to advocate for defeat of health care reform bill

From Bachmann's November 2 press release calling "on the American People to Bring the Town Hall to Washington":

"This bill is a trillion-dollar, budget-busting, government takeover of our health care system.  It will put bureaucrats between people and their health care.  It will lead to rationed care, hurting the most vulnerable amongst us first.  It will break the bank, leaving our children to pay the bill with diminished freedoms and dwindling prosperity.

"The American people need to stand up again and make sure that Congress hears them this time.  Speaker Pelosi is putting her bill on fast track to a vote - and it remains to be seen if the House will even get a chance to vote on the commonsense Republican alternatives.  The people need to make a House Call on Washington this week and tell their Representatives to vote no to a government take-over of one-fifth of our economy.  This is gangster government at its worst.

"I urge all Americans to come to Washington this Thursday.  Come and meet up with your Representative and tell them that you want to control your health care."

Fox News and its personalities repeatedly promoted Bachmann's anti-health care reform protest

Fox News' Napolitano: Bachmann "wants your help in the fight." Guest hosting for Glenn Beck on November 4, Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano stated that Bachmann is "fighting Democrats on the constitutionality of a national takeover of health care, and she wants your help in the fight." Napolitano hosted Bachmann to promote the protest and said, "Tell us what's going on outside the Capitol building tomorrow to try and bring some sense to these big government types that want to regulate health care from Washington, DC." During the show Napolitano also asserted that a friend in the intelligence community "told me watch out for Mrs. Pelosi making the security requirements almost impossible to get to this rally. You guys have to watch out for that."

Bachman: "[W]e began this on Sean Hannity's show." Also during the November 4 Glenn Beck broadcast, Bachman further detailed her motivations to organize the protest, saying, "what we've done, and we began this on Sean Hannity's show, is just to - the only thing I know to do at this point to kill this bill is to ask and plead for real freedom-loving Americans to come to the steps of the US Capitol tomorrow."

Hannity was "told the crowd is going to be massive ... my only wish is I wish I could be there." Hannity stated on the November 4 edition of his Fox News program, "Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann announced on this program last Friday that at noon tomorrow - by the way anybody that wants to go, you can go to the nation's capitol - they're gonna have a press conference, and then, I hear there are gonna be a lot of people--thousands of people. Our cameras are gonna be there. We'll have full coverage on the program tomorrow night. But they're gonna walk into the Capitol, and they're gonna confront Congressmen and Senators." In response to a caller planning to attend Bachmann's protest, Hannity also stated on the November 4 edition of his radio show, "I can tell you, I am told the crowd is going to be massive, and my only wish is I wish I could be there. But I tell you what I decided to do, I'm sending one of my reporters down there to cover the entire thing, and we're gonna air it tomorrow night on Hannity."

Fox News contributor Gingrich pushes protest on twitter. On November 3 Newt Gingrich posted on his twitter feed, "Help stop the gov't take-over of health care. Join the Rally Thursday against Obama/PelosiCare." Gingrich also posted a "Reminder" about the protest on November 4.

Fox & Friends hosted Bachmann, promoted protest details. During the November 3 edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Gretchen Carlson hosted Bachmann to talk about the protest, gave details of the protest to viewers, and urged viewers to access the program's website for more information on the protest. Carlson stated, "They can go to FoxandFriends.com; we'll link it to your website."


bachmann on fox & friends


Hannity: "I hope a lot of people can make it out." During the November 3 edition of his radio show, Hannity hosted Mark Levin to promote the protest, at which Levin is scheduled to speak. Hannity stated, "This is a last minute thing, and I know it's difficult for people to go to these things, especially at the time. It's noon on Thursday at the Capitol." He later added, "I hope a lot of people can make it out there, Mark."

Fox Nation promoted Bachmann protest. On its front page, accessed on November 3, Fox Nation promoted the protest, writing: "Bachmann Urges Confronting Lawmakers on Capitol Hill."  Fox Nation included links of Bachmann promoting the protest on Fox News host Glenn Beck's radio program, and video of Bachmann on Fox & Friends. On November 5, Fox Nation featured the headline, "Will You Join Bachmann's 'House Call' Party?"

Beck: "We'll get the word out ... and we'll continue to have you make the pitch for people going to Washington, DC, noon this Thursday." On the November 2 edition of Glenn Beck's radio show, Bachmann stated, "I really believe, Glenn, if we can get good normal patriot, freedom loving Americans to D.C., converge at noon on Thursday on the capitol steps, and what we need to do is literally go into these members of Congress' offices, look in the whites of their eyes and tell them don't take away my healthcare, don't take away my freedom. Because once government gets this power, Glenn, they can use healthcare as cradle to grave, they can use that as a pretext for controlling every other aspect of our life." Beck stated at the end of the interview, "Michele, God bless you. We'll get the word out and let's have you on a little bit later on this week and we'll continue to have you make the pitch for people going to Washington, D.C., noon this Thursday, and look them in the whites of their eyes." Bachmann again promoted the protest on the November 4 edition of Beck's radio program.

Hannity: "Maybe I'll have to show up and observe ... democracy in action." Bachmann said during the October 30 edition of Hannity that the protest is "Thursday at noon," adding, "You can go to MicheleBachmann.com for more information and we can walk together through Cannon, Longworth, Rayburn, walk through the capital, sit in the gallery." Hannity replied: "Maybe I'll have to show up and observe this so our cameras can see democracy in action."

Fox News has repeatedly engaged in conservative advocacy by promoting protests

Fox News promoted April 15 tea parties. In the lead-up to the April 15 tea parties, which the channel repeatedly described as "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties," Fox News frequently aired segments publicizing and encouraging viewers to get involved with the protests. A Media Matters for America study found that from April 6 to 13, Fox News featured at least 20 segments on the "tea party" protests. A subsequent Media Matters study found that from April 6 to 15, Fox News aired at least 107 commercial promotions for its coverage of the April 15 tea parties.

Fox News promoted health care disruptions. Fox News promoted disruptions of Democratic town hall events by protesters opposed to health care reform -- protests that are touted by Republican leaders and supported by conservative groups. Following the August 2 disruption of a town hall event hosted by Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Fox News personalities repeatedly lauded such protesters and urged viewers to take similar action.

Fox News promoted 9-12 protests. In the lead-up to the 9-12 protest, Beck's website worked with others organizing the September 12 "March on Washington," and he repeatedly encouraged viewers to attend the protest. Fox News also heavily promoted the Tea Party Express tour -- the final stop of which was the 9-12 protest -- on Fox News, Fox Business, the Fox Nation, and FoxNews.com.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (November 05, 2009 8:18 am ET)
      9 1
      Let me ask this question.

      Congresswoman Bachman is an elected member of the House of Representatives correct? As such, isn't she able, as much as anyone else within said House of Reps, to create, and get co-sponsors on legislation?

      If so; why doesn't she write her own health care bill, and submit it?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (November 05, 2009 8:25 am ET)
        9 2
        Because she's a doofus...?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (November 05, 2009 11:53 pm ET)
          4 1
          Here... here is your god damned Republican party

          Watch the part between 1:03 and 1:25 or so... see that sick and disgusting sign that was placed nearly in the center of that group of right-wing dumb asses where every single elected Republican who went up to the podium to speak would have absolutely seen it!!!

          If these Republican ass-clowns really gave a damn about this country and the political discourse thereof would you conservatives who come in here agree that they should have demanded that photo be taken down?? Or is this the direction you want your party going??

          As long as this kind of garbage keeps happening... rest assured that this country will either repudiate it to the point of Republicans losing every seat in 2010 or we keep the status quo as is and this country dies at the hands of right-wing hate, racism, and fear!

          For all you right-wing trolls... find me even ONE equivalent photo or rally or hell... anything that even comes close to this kind of vile that has come from even one liberal/progressive/Democrat... just one.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Marge (November 06, 2009 10:08 am ET)
            1  
            And did you know that Boehner defended those signs. HE said they were the fault of the democrats. He said that if they had "taken" over Washington with their actions the tea baggers and the republicans would not have to resort to those signs. I do not know if I am using the correct wordage but that is in effect what he said.

            He blamed it all on the democrats. I can not stress enough that these people, even tho this is a free country, should some how be held accountable for these outlandish actions. I don't mean any protester who wears a TShirt who said they didn't like bush get arrested, even a kid, as was done during bush's reign, but those people who invaded Pelosi's office should be locked up and put out of commission to perform like this in the future.

            And isn't inciting to riot against the law, and since it was on federal property, breaking federal law. Let's all write to the ethetic committee and ask Bachmann be investigated. She should be arrested.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by boschbomber (November 06, 2009 10:26 am ET)
             
          Doofus way to kind.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (November 05, 2009 8:29 am ET)
        11 2
        Perhaps it is because---to paraphrase Bill Maher, Michelle Bachman's idea of health reform is "allowing you to take your guns with you to the doctor"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (November 05, 2009 8:38 am ET)
          8 1
          True enough, it just makes me chuckle, that a woman, who is in a position, to actually WORK on the process, instead of just commenting about it, is holding a protest.

          When was the last time an elected official organized and held a protest against something that she could actually effectively work against by proposing her own legislation?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 05, 2009 9:15 am ET)
            9 3
            In real life (most of the time), the GOP's mantra has been "everything is fine, do nothing....." so I wouldn't hold your breath on the legislation.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
              2 9
              More like if conservatives disagree with the liberal tax raising idea then we must not have an idea worthy of discussion so you label it as we want the status quo...typical liberal illogical deductive rationalization to insultate yourselves from the truth.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by boschbomber (November 06, 2009 10:30 am ET)
              2  
              All the while the rich get richer and the poor and middle class suffers. Is it not so obvious that denial is the only answer along with Rush and Glenn, the right has. They are shameful, and a disgrace to America.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (November 05, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
            6 4
            Well, her methods of tapping into the pain and suffering that working folks have for our broken economy and channeling it into resentment for the progressive agenda is actually pretty effective. You have to remember also that, as a conservative, she has no regard for the rule of law, unless of course government is forcing her personal religious views on the country. She's Palin-lite.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (November 05, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
            5 2
            She's just trying to muck up the works.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (November 05, 2009 10:03 am ET)
        6 2
        magnolialover -
        I know that your questions are rhetorical, but I'll toss in my answer anyway.

        Crazy Michele isn't interested in doing anything productive. She doesn't want to solve any problems. She's discovered that by being crazy she gets media attention and she loves it. She can't get enough of it. She's gotten to be a bit like Coulter in that she'll do whatever she has to do in order to get herself thrust back into the limelight.

        In a pundit, that can be amusing or disgusting. In an elected official, that can be dangerous. Our best hope is to make sure that fourteen months from now she becomes nothing but an amusing footnote.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (November 05, 2009 10:17 am ET)
          7 2
          Oh, I completely understand your response, and I know how Bachman operates. It's just funny to me that she's leading a protest basically against her colleagues in the House, when there are other things that she could do that might actually be productive.

          I hope the good people of MN are watching how she conducts herself, and vote her out of office in '10.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (November 05, 2009 10:51 am ET)
            7 1
            I hope the good people of MN are watching how she conducts herself, and vote her out of office in '10.

            My understanding is that Bachmann's district is extremely conservative and not likely disapproving of her impersonation of Sarah Palin. But there is always hope.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (November 05, 2009 10:55 am ET)
              5 1
              If that's the case, then maybe there isn't hope for her district. Ah well. A man can dream.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by ScienceBuff (November 05, 2009 11:17 am ET)
              3 1
              It is a pretty conservative district, but not radically so. The DFL ran a pretty weak candidate last time as almost a throwaway token effort, but even he came close when Crazy Michele made her comments accusing Obama and members of Congress of being "anti-American." When her numbers fell drastically, there was a sudden influx of campaign help for her that smeared her opponent in a large buy of television ads. That late in the campaign he wasn't able to get a rapid enough response out to counter them.

              There is some embarrassment in her district now that she's heading further around the bend and a strong candidate would have a pretty good chance.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (November 05, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
          8 1
          Version # 1

          Crazy Michele isn't interested in doing anything productive. She doesn't want to solve any problems. She's discovered that by being crazy she gets media attention and she loves it. She can't get enough of it. She's gotten to be a bit like Coulter in that she'll do whatever she has to do in order to get herself thrust back into the limelight.

          In a pundit, that can be amusing or disgusting. In an elected official, that can be dangerous. Our best hope is to make sure that fourteen months from now she becomes nothing but an amusing footnote.

          Version # 2

          FoxNews isn't interested in doing anything productive. They don't want to fairly discuss any problems. They've discovered that by being highly partisan they get attention from a sizeable viewer base and their advertisers love it. Their rightwing pundits can't get enough of it. They've gotten to be a bit like Coulter in that they'll do whatever they have to do in order to get themselves and the right-leaning politicians they support thrust back into the limelight.

          In private group settings, that bias and promotion of a politically partisan message can be amusing or disgusting. In a supposedly legit news organization, that can be dangerous. Our best hope is to make sure that fourteen months from now the influence of FoxNews decreases to the level they deserve and that they lose their status as a legit media sour and become nothing but an amusing footnote.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by joedla1117 (November 05, 2009 8:25 pm ET)
               
            Just like the Tabloids, from which they came, they will stoop to anything to sell their news.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 11:22 am ET)
        2 13
        Because the democrats have excluded all Republican participation in the process. There have been at least 6 proposals and none of them are evne being read much less considered. So we have to take the fight directly to the white house...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (November 05, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
          9 1
          The Republicans had 6 years of congressional and White House rule to do something about health care, and they chose let the problem fester. Where was all this "fight" back then?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
            1 8
            We had to deal with 9-11 as a higher priority.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (November 05, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              5  
              Is that a joke?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (November 05, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
                3 1
                It's a very disgusting and rude joke.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 3:58 pm ET)
                1 7
                OK so if Gore won, he would have spent tax dollars on nationalizing healthcare post 9-11 and the 9-11 type attacks would have continued. This Obamacare could pay for 100 wars if we were threatened in the future but no, better to give illegals free access to abortion through obamacare....Good thinking...not a joke...
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (November 05, 2009 11:03 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Why are we presuming that attacks would have continued? That seems like a very convenient and utterly unsupportable contention. Moreover, how do you even know we would have had 9/11 at all? Perhaps Gore would not have ignored the warnings.
                  This Obamacare could pay for 100 wars if we were threatened in the future but no, better to give illegals free access to abortion through obamacare....Good thinking...not a joke...
                  We could wage a thousand wars, but terrorists are not bound to any particular country. They're not going to collectively surrender like the Japanese in WWII. This is why terrorism prevention is an intelligence/infiltration matter, because a few dozen people can launch an attack no matter how many "flypaper" wars we start.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by John Paradox (November 06, 2009 3:58 am ET)
                    2  
                    Why are we presuming that attacks would have continued?

                    Because 'we' are not used to long-term thinking. In the U.S., we complain when our meal takes more than a few minutes, if the computer takes a minute or more to boot (I get impatient when Firefox doesn't almost instantly pop up), if we can't drive 60 in a 40 MPH zone and have to wait at a red light because we're overrunning the timing of the lights.
                    Consider that the Shiites and Sunnis have been battling for centuries, that it was eight years (1993-2001) between WTC attacks, and even families in the Mideast have feuds going back several generations.
                    The Terrorists are not trying to get as many attacks in as short a time as possible, they are more interested in taking their time and getting it right. I just watched an old episode of NUMB3RS that I burned to DVD, where one of the lead characters (Charlie Epps, for those who know the show) is taking a marksmanship test, and while the others are blasting away quick shots, he calmly takes aim, and comparatively slowly takes his 14 shots, getting the highest score in the group. When the instructor asks him how he did it, he quoted Wyatt Earp about how careful aim is more effective than quick shots.
                    Then, there's the story of the tortoise and the hare...
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 05, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
              6  
              Excuse me, but we ALL had to deal with 9/11. From your posts, I see that you're one of those "team" players . . . it would be VERY nice if you "team" players from BOTH sides of the aisle started playing for OUR team . . . the USA.

              The President and Congress took their collective eyes off of the REAL perpetrators of 9/11 in favor of prosecuting an unnecessary, unrelated and VERY expensive "war" of choice. Using 9/11 as an excuse for not doing anything about health care is specious. Nothing was done because they didn't want to do anything about it.

              The Democrats have accepted and incorporated amendment after amendment submitted by the Republicans, but the Republicans continue to refuse to approve anything. Why? Because they have NO intention to do so.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
                1 8
                WHY???...because of the public option.... which is the doorway to socialism....that is why...If dems were really concerned about healthcare then they would deregulate state lines for competition instead of saying the gov't option will provide competition to lower costs.

                If the dems were serios about making healthcare affordable for everyone (instead of free for illegals) then there would be discussions of TORT reform...But those ideas are prevented from being discussed by the old witch Pelosi...That slam the doors on conservatives with these kind of strong ideas and then call tea party attendees cooks who ask for these logical, proven cost custting ideas.

                Bottom line folks is the dems don't care about lowering costs to make healthcare affordable for everyone. They want to take it over and dictate who gets what level of care.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (November 06, 2009 12:42 am ET)
                  3  
                  There is nothing that disallows any insurance company from offering insurance in any state (besides Massachusetts, since they already have their version of univeral healthcare), so this deregulation that's being touted wouldn't do a thing that can't be done already!

                  We've already debunked the tort reform nonsense, as has the CBO. It would leave 99.5% of the costs untouched. Tort reform only reduces costs by 1/2 of 1%. It's not a solution, and it denies people the right to sue for what they think they should get and it denies juries the right to award what they think is fair.

                  Bottom line is, we care more than you do about savings money, but we care even more about providing healthcare to as many as possible. What the Republican bill shows us is that your side doesn't care at all about insuring more people. You don't even provide a solution for pre-existing conditions. Some Republican Congressman said tonight on FoxNews that their efforts to lower premiums would remedy the pre-existing condition problem - it won't at all, of course. Denial of insurance coverage won't be remedied by lower cost premiums for those who can get insurance. Lower premiums won't help 90% of those who don't have insurance now - they need significant subsidies, and if their employers won't provide that subsidy, it's going to be the govt that does it.

                  But your side doesn't care. Ours does.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bewildered (November 06, 2009 12:53 am ET)
                  1  
                  You sound just like Fox. Do you work for them?

                  Even if this bill passes, The U.S. will still be a democratic capitalist republic. Do some research instead of watching Fox and you'd realize that other countries with universal health care aren't socialist either.

                  U.S. is the ONLY wealthy nation in the world that doesn't provide health insurance/care for all citizens.

                  Doing nothing is no longer an option.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
                1 5
                Why does Obama call it a war of necessity?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (November 06, 2009 12:45 am ET)
                  4  
                  Obama doesn't call the war in Iraq a war of necessity, you dunce! He calls the war in Afghanistan that! How did you miss the distinction being made between the war to go after the perpetrators of 9/11 and changing their focus to Iraq? Is your reading comprehension really that bad?

                  The invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and a stupid idea.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by justjoe628 (November 06, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
              1
            Well Pete, I hate to do it, but I have to agree. I blame this mess on Bush and the republican party for not addressing the issue sooner. You can't use 9/11 as an excuse for everything. It was a very difficult problem to deal with, but that doesn't mean you can virtually ignore any domestic agenda, which is what they did. The republicans have offered some alternative bills but it's too little too late. They should have done something when they were in control. They had to know that the democrats were going to address the issue in the future if they gained control again. They missed their opportuntiy and now the whole nation may have to pay for it.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (November 05, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
          6  
          And guess what? Republicans are STILL not stopped from writing their own legislation, getting co-sponsors, and introducing it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
              6
            Yeah there is nothing stopping me from asking the Boston Red Sox to let me be their short stop either.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (November 06, 2009 12:51 am ET)
              3  
              Yes, so you can't complain that they won't LET YOU APPLY, just like Republicans can't say that they're denied the ability to submit ideas.

              Man, you're out of your league on this blog though. You need to go back to the minor leagues!
              Report Abuse
            • Author by justjoe628 (November 06, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
                 
              You should stop. You're not helping.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by justjoe628 (November 06, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
                 
              You should stop. You're not helping.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (November 05, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
          7 1
          False. The white house is bending over backwards to include Republicans. It's simply the fault of the GOP that they can't get any public traction with their 'ideas.'

          Report Abuse
          • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
            1 8
            That is a flat out lie. Did you see all the congress people holding up their proposals last month when Obama was called a liar? They are not listening. Just like they discount the real Americans who protest at rallys and town hall meetings as astro turf and paid mobs. We have been put on mute while the Obama controlled media feeds you libs the lie that they are trying to be bi partisan. Obama is not interseted in reaching across the isle...He wants his agenda...contol healthcare while increasing the role of gov't...the crown jewel of socialism.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 05, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
              5 1
              You are incorrect. At least 160 GOP amendments were approved in the Senate . . . that wasn't enough.

              Your entire post is full of out and out lies . . . you are posting talking points which are not true.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
                1 5
                Again what does it matter when you stink up the meal with the public option...those 160 GOP amendments was favor trading..you guys put this amendment in as a compromise and we let this one pass and we will let that one pass....The recent meetings have excluded the Republicans. It is a fact. My cousin is one of them that has not been allowed in...first hand eye witness knowledge.

                If it the bill is so good, then why to dems refuse to post it on the internet??? Why...the response from Pelosi was..."People don't care about the details"

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (November 05, 2009 9:29 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Congress people were holding up proposals for the cameras?
                  Just as likely they were holding up menus from Duke Zeibert's. It was a crass publicity stunt, showing not only a lack of respect, but a lack of integrity.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by justjoe628 (November 06, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
                   
                Better check that number. The were "technically" 160 ammendments, but only about 23 of them were of substance. The other were technical ammendments that just slightly changed verbage. So 160 sounds like a big number, but it is not.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (November 05, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
              3 1
              real Americans

              Are you Sarah Palin?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
                  8
                Real Americans participate in the process...Lame ones listen to Obama run media and don't ask any hard questions of him because they don't want to be acused of being a racist...
                Report Abuse
            • Author by JLP (November 05, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
              2 1
              Reaching across the isle? Does this have something to do with him being birthed in Hawaii?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Slobahonnis (November 05, 2009 2:20 pm ET)
          3 1
          A very lame excuse. "Oh, those mean ol' Democrats won't let us play." LOL. The GOP, the "Can't Do" party, had a decade to do something, ANYTHING, about healthcare. They were in power. They chose to do nothing other than to legalize more versions of fraud in the industry (perscription drug bill, Medicare "Advantage"). They haven't been excluded. They have chosen to exclude themselves.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:11 pm ET)
            1 4
            The can’t do party??? So when you guys filibuster and kill bills, I guess that doesn’t factor into your biased opinion...Remember you did contol the house and the senate for the past 5 years...Please....if wasn’t for Republicans we would be a third world country because our military would be non existent.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Conchobhar (November 05, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
              3  
              Your math is as bad as your history, which is as bad as your ideology. Democrats regained the majority in 2006. That's three, not five, years ago. Now, if you can, read this filibuster chart. If you understand it, come back and eat crow.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Slobahonnis (November 06, 2009 12:59 am ET)
              1  
              Datamodel...LOL...We nearly ARE a third world country thanks to the GOP. They governed over the biggest upward shift in economic wealth on record and bankrupted us in the process. You could argue that it wasn't by design, but rather just a horrible mistake. Either way, it is the result of complete incompetence over an extended period of time. That crap is over. Lead, follow or get out of the way.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by kalentros (November 06, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
              1  
              Ahhh...of course. The government should have no power to run anything, unless of course it involves killing and destroying those evil "others" who are not like "us".
              Report Abuse
        • Author by joedla1117 (November 05, 2009 9:03 pm ET)
          2  
          Why are the Republicans not showing there bills to the public. I have only heard of them, including one that supposedly will save $5,000 to a family of 4 earning $78,000. All I can find on that is a fictitious looking chart. According to Reuters: In 2019, with this bill, there would still be 52 Million uninsured, and allow the insurance companies to cherry pick there enrollees, and charge unreasonable rate to those that are not in very good health. I am sure that can not happen with HR3962.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by daniaboot (November 05, 2009 7:56 pm ET)
           
        Good question. (My first post, better late etc...)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Eric_Arthur_Blair (November 06, 2009 1:00 am ET)
        1  
        I checked, and found that in all the time she's been in congress, she's co-sponsored 29 bills but I couldn't find any information on bills she's actually written (two of those co-sponsorships were for recognizing Minnesota's statehood sesquecentennial). Maybe she doesn't know how to write one. If she did, it would probably be based on faith healing.

        Meanwhile, there's John Boehner, who doesn't know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. These people really have a lot on the ball (maybe that's why they call themselves teabaggers).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (November 05, 2009 9:50 am ET)
      5 1
      We all know Barbara Bachmann talks nuts, we now have to assume she really is nuts, just like the Tea Baggers she is leading.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (November 05, 2009 9:54 am ET)
        3  
        Barbara?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by manofmystique (November 05, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
          4  
          Correction:
          We all know Michele, not Barbara, Bachmann talks nuts, we now have to assume she really is nuts, just like the Tea Baggers she is leading.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Bucket Fishing (November 05, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
        3  
        Maybe you meant Barabra Bach? Now if she was a congress woman....
        darn, drooled on the old keyboard.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jfkisgr8 (November 05, 2009 10:02 am ET)
      4  
      There's no surprise by this. Fox's new slogan- Fox News: Proving Anita Dunn right everyday.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
      1 11
      When are you libs going to wake up...big gov't does not work....talk about fake numbers...how about the GDP!!! It's all gov't growth. Conservatives represent the founding father's wishes...You liberals represent failed policies of Communistic societies...Either you are working for the gov't, a union member or want gay's to have an elevated status in society. Why is it you people always look for what is in it for you instead of what is good for the country? JFK would be far right of where you are today. Persoanlly I don't feel I should have to pay for abortion with my tax contributions...where is my right to choose? I also think we should not make illegals eligible. Do you really think the Health care bill is going to be rev neutal because they are going to suddenly reduce waste? How come your elected representatives won't guarantee that we can keep our coverage or that there won't be rationing? Better still, why won't your democratic dominated elected officials go on the Public option if it is so good?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 05, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
        8 1
        Why are you posting talking points?

        BTW, you really do need to understand that disagreement with your incorrect and false posts does not make someone a lib anymore than your posting them makes you a con. You are simply incorrect. Pretty simple.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
          1 7
          Yes, I understand when your opinion is so weak and you don't have an answer - just destroy the source....pretty simple...if your iq is under 100...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
            7
          Tell me what is false about it instead of your generalized mantra that the opposing opinion is always incorrect...even when it's true.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bewildered (November 06, 2009 1:36 am ET)
            2  
            Persoanlly I don't feel I should have to pay for abortion with my tax contributions...where is my right to choose?


            The public option could offer abortion services, but if it does, those services would be paid for with segregated patient premiums, not public subsidies. We looked at the Capps amendment is some detail previously. We concluded that the Capps amendment would stop tax dollars from subsidizing abortion.


            http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/nov/04/house-republicans/public-option-could-pay-unsubsidized-abortion/

            I also think we should not make illegals eligible.


            Page 50, which the e-mail references, is part of Section 152, which includes a generic nondiscrimination clause saying that insurers may not discriminate with regard to "personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services."

            The section says nothing about "non-US citizens" or immigrants, legal or otherwise. In fact, the legislation specifically states that "undocumented aliens" will not be eligible for credits to help them buy health insurance, in Section 246 on page 143.


            http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jul/30/chain-email/no-free-health-care-illegal-immigrants-health-bill/

            Democrats say the main health care bill, HR 3200, explicitly prevents illegal immigrants from getting "affordability credits" — tax credits for low-income people to buy health insurance on a national health insurance exchange. While illegal immigrants would be able to buy insurance just as a qualifying legal resident could, they would have to pay for it themselves without the "affordability credit" subsidy. (If you want to check, it's on page 132, section 242.) That's essentially keeping the status quo, in which illegal immigrants are able to buy private insurance on their own dime.


            http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/10/house-republicans/house-republicans-back-heckler-saying-health-bill-/

            Here are a few of your answers to your falsehoods, datamodel. You scrawled so many talking points I would need more time to refute them. Datamodel, please go do some research instead of believing everything you hear.

            Talking points are not reasonable intelligent arguements. If you believe in free speech then make your own sentences instead of repeating the same old rhetoric that has already been refuted.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by JLP (November 05, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
        3  
        Illegals eligible for what? Also, your grasp of economics and history seem to be lacking.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by joedla1117 (November 05, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
        4  
        How can you make these statements, when you obviously have not even glanced at the bill. There are a number of statements regarding abortions. HR 3962 page 246, line 12 for example. Most deny any federal payment especially involving credits. Almost every thing else you are saying is wrong. Why do you want to deny the rights of others, that this bill will help?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by joedla1117 (November 05, 2009 8:17 pm ET)
        2  
        How can you make these statements, when you obviously have not even glanced at the bill. There are a number of statements regarding abortions. HR 3962 page 246, line 12 for example. Most deny any federal payment especially involving credits. Almost every thing else you are saying is wrong. Why do you want to deny the rights of others, that this bill will help?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (November 05, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
      8 1
      Interesting. Right now this "revolt" is the lead story on foxnews.com. I couldn't find a single mention of it on cnn.com. They lead with the endorsement of the health care plans by the AMA and AARP.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (November 05, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
      6 1
      Today - Thursday, November 5th, Mrs. Bachmann is on Sheer "Am I An Idiot?" InSannity's show talking about how this was an "organic" event promoted by word of mouth.

      She's on Faux Noise, after being on InSannity's show, The Little Guy's show, etc., saying this had no leadership and was a grassroots effort?

      Huh?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by datamodel (November 05, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
          7
        So Hannity let people know but he didn't bus in goons from ACORN like dems do..that is why Pelosi even has a her little coined phrase of astro turf as she is the queen of it and projecting on real americans.

        Do you really think Pelosi cares about you? DO you really think she knows waht the "American People" want? Do you really think she cares what the majority of us want. Stop picking on TV show hosts and start criticizing these idiots spending away our future.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (November 06, 2009 12:55 am ET)
          2  
          Duh, this site is set up for criticism of the conservative hosts on TV shows.

          Not sure how you missed that.... but it means that your criticism that we should "stop picking on TV show hosts" is pretty darn ludicrous!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (November 05, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
      5  
      Sheer "Am I An Idiot?" InSannity proclaimed there were 20,000 people at today's (Thursday, November 5th) protest rally.

      Of course he's taking credit for starting the ball rolling on this one. Although The Little Guy thinks he started it...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by joedla1117 (November 05, 2009 7:33 pm ET)
      3  
      I can not understand how these people can be so very evil.
      Every thing against the health bill is really a stab at Obama.
      She and others are fueling the fire to bring out the very low IQ protesters to do the damage to much needed legislation. Killing the bill, will inevitably harm them and all of theirs and our future generations. I wonder if any of them know who the very bad people are that are paying for most of the tea parties.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TrueBlue62 (November 05, 2009 10:06 pm ET)
      3  
      I live in Minnesota. Most people here are embarrassed by Bachmann. She's supported by right wing extremists who don't care about the average American.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by r2xman (November 06, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
         
      These people could care less about whether or not this rally was pre-planned or not. If Fox tells them it was a spontaneous rally then they will believe it was a spontaneous rally. This whole tea bagger thing has gone from being comical at first to now being extremely dangerous. These people are nothing more than uneducated racist rednecks who would probably benefit more from healthcare overhaul than anybody.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.