Abandoning earlier attacks, Fox now suggests Obama is "delay[ing]" Afghanistan decision to "push through health care reform"
Introducing a panel discussion about President Obama's consideration of whether to send additional troops to Afghanistan, Brian Kilmeade asked if it is "possible the president delayed making a decision in order to push through health care reform." Kilmeade's comments follow earlier Fox News attacks suggesting ulterior motives for Obama's deliberations on Afghanistan, first that he "delay[ed]" his decision in order to win the Nobel Peace Prize and later that Obama was delaying a decision until after the November 2009 elections.
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Kilmeade suggests health care reform is setting timeline for Obama's decision
Kilmeade: "Politics playing a role?" On the November 11 edition of Fox & Friends, Kilmeade introduced a discussion by saying, "Seventy-four days after General [Stanley] McChrystal gave his Afghan troop recommendations, the president now reportedly on the verge of sending an additional 30,000 troops or more to Afghanistan. Is it possible the president delayed making a decision in order to push through health care reform, which is still on hold? Back with our panel to discuss it. Politics playing a role?"
Graphic: "Delay Troop Decision for Health Care?" During the ensuing discussion, on-screen text appeared that read, "Political Strategy: Delay Troop Decision for Health Care?":

Fox News personalities previously accused Obama of withholding troops to secure Nobel Peace Prize
Morris: Obama "delaying the decision to commit troops to Afghanistan ... because he wanted this prize." During an appearance on the October 12 edition of Hannity, Fox News contributor Dick Morris stated, "I think the reason that Obama was delaying the decision to commit troops to Afghanistan is because he wanted this prize, and he probably knew he was nominated for it, he knew roughly when the decision is being made, and I don't think he's going to send troops until after that award is safely in his pocket." [Hannity, 10/12/09]
Kilmeade: "I'm wondering, does [the Nobel Peace Prize charter] have anything to do with the delay of the deployment of 40,000 troops in Afghanistan?" Responding to initial reports that Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, Kilmeade stated, "I'm looking at the charter -- and we're just getting this now -- but this guy, Alfred Nobel, stipulated the peace prize should go to the person who will have done the most or the best work of the fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses. I'm wondering, does that have anything to do with the delay of the deployment of 40,000 troops in Afghanistan, because that was his big postulization over the last week or so. 'Should I put more troops in?' " Kilmeade went on to say, "If you add forces to a war, you can't win." [Fox & Friends, 10/9/09]
Krauthammer suggested Obama was delaying decision in part because of electoral calculations
Krauthammer: "I think they'd rather have a decision after the November odd-year elections." On Special Report, Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer stated, "I think it's correct that they are postponing the decision till after the elections in Afghanistan, but -- perhaps it's only a coincidence, but that's also after the elections in the United States. Because it's going to be unpopular either way, and I think they'd rather have a decision after the November odd-year elections." In response, host Bret Baier asked, "But are you saying there's a political calculation domestically for liberals in New Jersey or Virginia if the decision is, 'Let's go with the full troop contingent'?" Krauthammer replied, "Suggesting that cynicism is possible in this administration. That's as far as I'll go." [Special Report with Bret Baier, 10/26/09]

















Even if you want to criticize O's predecessor, it has nothing to do with not sending troops to Afghanistan.
Obama is in over his head. He is being run by Emanuel and Axelrod. They are delaying because they don't want to alienate the far left before the election. Now O's got to make a decision and the odds are they'll send the troops. What is telling is that O won't explain why he waited 4 months to do it. That tells me and many others that he is a weak commander in chief. People are dying in Afghanistan while he plays golf, goes to Copenhagen to support the Olympics and vacations.
The Peace Prize thing on the other hand...
It's because they happen to choose whatever 'reason' is convenient at the moment. It's that they abandoned their earlier 'reasons' for this 'reason'. So, which is it? What's the real 'reason' he has delayed the Afghanistan decision? Is it any ONE of their speculations? How did it magically change from one reason to another?
Plus, Fox's previous speculation was so rock-stupid (the peace prize was completely off everybody's radar) that they aren't allowed to opine again on the subject.
It is about the aliens who gain acceptance by promising “Universal” Healthcare and who have a healthy relationship with the press (so long as nothing critical is expressed). It turns out that this healthcare deal is a lie and the aliens, who have been hiding in the shadows for a long time actually want to fundamentally change the planet, but not in a good way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQoSCEMzJYE&feature=player_embedded
Is this Sci Fi or parody of something else?