About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Gaffney's fearmongering about trying KSM in U.S. undermined by past success in prosecuting terrorists

November 13, 2009 12:27 pm ET — 22 Comments

Responding to reports that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (KSM) and four others accused of being involved in the 9-11 attacks are going to be tried in New York City, Washington Times columnist Frank Gaffney stated during Fox & Friends that Mohammed will "be a rock star in the prison system" who will "use our prisons as incubators for people who they're recruiting to jihad" and speculated that KSM would be "sprung" after being "lawyered up" and given "constitutional rights." In fact, both the Clinton and Bush administrations tried and imprisoned terror suspects in our federal system without incident.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Gaffney, Fox & Friends agree bringing KSM to U.S. is "serious mistake"

From the November 13 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

GRETCHEN CARLSON (co-host): And we're back with former assistant secretary of defense and president of the Center for Security Policy, Frank Gaffney, live from D.C. this morning. All right, Frank, so you were on our air earlier talking about the Fort Hood shootings and then, these alerts started coming in that Eric Holder, the attorney general of the United States, will make the announcement later today that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is coming to New York City. Do you find anything about the timing of this interesting? Or am I being too cynical?

GAFFNEY: Well, I don't know about the timing, all I can tell you is about the quality of the decision. I think that this is a disaster. What the president says is going to be exacting justice I think is going to be anything but, because what will happen, the moment Khalid Shaikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators, or fellow travelers, arrive in the United States is they will be imbued with a host of constitutional rights that it's almost unimaginable for most Americans that we're going to be giving to our enemies, people sworn to our destruction. They will also be immediately lawyered up with some of the best lawyers in the country who will be working to apply those rights in ways that may well get them sprung, because we're going to find that suddenly some of the techniques that were used to extract information from Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, for example waterboarding, constitutes torture in the view of judges.

[...]

BRIAN KILMEADE (co-host): Can you imagine here, where New York City is still a terror target, and then you bring the mastermind of 9-11 here? It's impossible to put that in perspective, I think.

GAFFNEY: Yeah, no, I think you're absolutely right. He'll be a rock star in the prison system. And one of the things that we've been learning about the, sort of, influence operations and other mechanics of what's been happening in our country by those who adhere -- as I talked about earlier, to sharia -- is they use our prisons as incubators for people to they're recruiting to jihad.

KILMEADE: Yep.

GAFFNEY: Having a guy like Khalid Shaikh Mohammed anywhere in the system I think will only enhance that effort and make this a much more dangerous country than it is today.

However, Bush administration used federal justice system to bring several terrorism suspects to justice

Zacarias Moussaoui tried, convicted, and imprisoned through federal justice system. Moussaoui was found guilty by a federal court jury for his role in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. As The New York Times reported, the jury voted "to send him to prison for the rest of his days rather than condemn him to death for the carnage of Sept. 11, 2001." Moussaoui is serving his sentence at the ADX Florence prison, commonly referred to as Supermax, in Florence, Colorado.

"Shoe bomber" Richard Reid is serving life sentence in Colorado. On January 31, 2003, as The New York Times reported, Richard Reid pleaded guilty in federal court "to trying to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight with explosives concealed in his shoes" and "was sentenced today to life in prison." Reid had claimed "he was a member of Al Qaeda." Reid is serving his sentence at the Supermax facility in Florence.

John Walker Lindh serving sentence in Indiana. As CNN.com reported, on October 4, 2002, "Walker Lindh, the so-called 'Taliban American,' told U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III that he 'made a mistake by joining the Taliban' and 'had I realized then what I know now about the Taliban I would never have joined them,' " before being sentenced for his crimes. CNN.com reported that in July, Lindh pleaded "guilty to one count of supplying services to the Taliban and a criminal charge that he carried a rifle and two hand grenades while fighting on the Taliban's front lines in Afghanistan against the Northern Alliance." Lindh was once held at the Supermax facility and is now being held at the Federal Correctional Institute in Terre Haute, Indiana.

East African embassy bombing perpetrators were tried in U.S. and held at Supermax. As the National Security Network has noted, "Wahid el-Hage, Mohammed Sadiq Odeh, Mohammed Rashed al-Owhali, and Khalfan Khamis Mohammed are all serving in ADX Florence." The New York Times reported that the four men, who were "convicted of conspiring with Osama bin Laden in the 1998 bombings of two American Embassies in Africa," were "moved to the most secure federal prison in the United States." The men were indicted in 1998 under the Clinton administration and tried, convicted, and sentenced in 2001.

Clinton administration also used federal justice system to bring terrorist suspects to justice

First World Trade Center bomber, Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, was tried and convicted in the federal justice system. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef was found guilty of conspiring to bomb airlines on September 5, 1996, and was convicted on November 12, 1997, of, in the words of The New York Times, "directing and helping carry out" the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The New York Times separately reported on January 9, 1998, that "Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, the man who masterminded the World Trade Center bombing five years ago, was sentenced yesterday to spend life plus 240 years in prison." Yousef reportedly is being held at the Supermax facility in Colorado.

Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman was tried and convicted in federal court and is serving sentence in federal prison. As The New York Times reported, "Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and nine other militant Muslims were convicted" on October 1, 1995, "of conspiring to carry out a terrorist campaign of bombings and assassinations intended to destroy the United Nations and New York landmarks, kill hundreds of people and force America to abandon its support for Israel and Egypt." A January 1996 New York Times article reported: "Last October, culminating a nearly nine-month trial, a Federal jury convicted Mr. Abdel Rahman and the nine others of planning to wage a 'war of urban terrorism' against America, whose central element was to have been a cataclysmic day of terror in and around New York City: five bombs that were to blow up the United Nations Building, the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, the George Washington Bridge and the main Federal office building in Manhattan." Rahman was sentenced to life in prison and reportedly is serving his term at the Supermax facility in Colorado.

Hundreds of other terrorists are already imprisoned in the U.S.

There are already more than 350 terrorists in U.S. prisons; none has ever escaped. A May 29 Slate.com article reported that according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, "federal facilities on American soil currently house 216 international terrorists and 139 domestic terrorists. Some of these miscreants have been locked up here since the early 1990s. None of them has escaped. At the most secure prisons, nobody has ever escaped."

Colorado federal Supermax prison "holds some of the country's most infamous prisoners." From an October 4 Washington Post article:

The 490-bed prison, formally known as the Administrative Maximum Facility, holds some of the country's most infamous prisoners, including Mohammed's nephew Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted in the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center; the Unabomber, Theodore J. Kaczynski; FBI agent-turned-Soviet mole Robert P. Hanssen; and Terry L. Nichols, who was convicted in the 1995 bombing of an Oklahoma City federal building. Thirty-three international terrorists are held there.

Former Navy lawyer: "There is no increased threat posed to the United States by bringing some of the detainees to the U.S. for trial." In an October 29 NPR interview, Charles Swift, an attorney who took the case of a Guantánamo detainee to the Supreme Court in 2006, said that "[a]nyone knowledgeable about al-Qaida operations will tell you that there is no increased threat posed to the United States by bringing some of the detainees to the U.S. for trial." Swift added that "[Suspected terrorists] Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, Yaser Esam Hamdi and Jose Padilla were held and, in Hamdi and al-Marri's case, eventually tried in the United States without any consequence."

Wash. Post: Suspects in federal prisons face "more draconian" conditions than at Guantánamo

Wash. Post: Suspects sent to highest-security federal prisons would face "vastly more draconian" conditions than at Guantánamo. The October 4 Washington Post article, headlined "Detainees Face Severe Conditions if Moved to U.S.," reported that detainees sent to the highest-security federal prisons would face conditions "vastly more draconian than they are at Guantanamo Bay." From the Post article:

Based on what is known about restrictions in the country's highest-security federal prisons, Mohammed and other terrorism suspects would face profound isolation in the United States.

If sent to a facility such as the federal supermax prison in Florence, Colo., they would be sealed off for 23 hours a day in cells with four-inch-wide windows and concrete furniture. If they behave, and are allowed an hour's exercise each day in a tiny yard, they will do so alone. They will have little or no human contact except with prison officials. And the International Committee of the Red Cross, the only outside group with access to Camp 7, will no longer have contact with them.

"You will die with a whimper," U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema told Zacarias Moussaoui, before the Sept. 11 conspirator was taken to the supermax facility in Florence to serve a life sentence. "You will never again get a chance to speak."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pilotshark (November 13, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
      5  
      Oh yes he will just take over i am sure the dozen or so gangs there now will just roll over and let these big tuff terrorist take over, Hell that could have been the plan from the start.

      shaking my head
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 14, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
        3  
        No kidding. These right-wingers are so cowardly and anti-American at this point, they have even lost respect for our prisoners.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (November 13, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
      5  
      So, Frank Gaffney? Really. Well, you've got quite a bit more to fear from this man, Ms. Carlson, than from most Muslims you meet. After all, he is one of the founding members of PNAC. Do you know what some of the other members of PNAC called September 11th, 2001? Repeatedly? An 'opportunity'. An opportunity that gave us things like the Department of Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, illegal domestic surveillance, and torture of detainees.

      But, since he thinks that our President was born in Kenya, and is secretly a Muslim, I can understand why you'd have him on. He also believes that there are WMDs in Iraq, and that it was necessary for us to invade.

      For the folks at FOX Propaganda, I have a simple suggestion. If you truly believe that inmates will flock to Khalid's banner, and be eager to participate in violence against the United States, then you should question just how our inmates are being treated by the system. This is a battle of hearts and minds, and as I have pointed out elsewhere, you can bomb a country into submission, but that will never make them love you.

      Could it be that a disproportionate number of minorities are incarcerated? Could it be that inmates, powerless inside, are often the victims of abuse at the hands of, not only other inmates but corrections officers and staff as well? Could it be we have a system that would rather lock up the occasional innocent rather than have to admit mistakes? You have found the ragged edge of an actual newsworthy story here. Now, do you know what to do with it? It has been said by wiser men than me that you can tell a lot about a society based on how it treats it's most defenseless members.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (November 13, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
        4  
        Just in the interest of full disclosure, I have been locked up myself, though in county jail, never prison. I was charged, and I plead guilty. Why? Because I knew that I had committed the crime for which I was charged, and I felt it only truthful to 'fess up. I'd be willing to bet that this happens far more frequently than Ms. Carlson or Mr. Kilmeade would like to admit.

        I suspect that their version of reality, where every criminal is guilty but many escape justice over some minor technicality, is much more akin to fantasy. Not everyone charged is guilty. Not all who are guilty are convicted. It is not a perfect system, but I doubt it is as bad as they are trying to paint it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pongotwistleton (November 13, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
          1 1
          On paper, our system of criminal justice is great. In reality, defendants all too often get shafted by incompetent and/or lazy attorneys, and callous and over-ambitious prosecutors out to make a big name for themselves.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by classicliberal2 (November 13, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
        3  
        But, since he thinks that our President was born in Kenya, and is secretly a Muslim, I can understand why you'd have him on.


        Gaffney is a conspiracist clown of the worst sort, and I'd like to see Media Matters point it out every damn time he appears anywhere. It's extraordiarily frustrating that he's treated as a serious commentator on anything. This is a man who, among other things, will not only tell you Obama is Kenyan and a secret Muslim, but will insist that Saddam Hussein was behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the Sept. 11th attacks. There are UFO conspiracists in tinfoil hats that would make more credible commentators, yet, he writes his lunatic screeds and is asked to appear all over television as a serious commentator on contemporary issues. MMFA would do well to point this out loudly and consistently.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 14, 2009 7:04 pm ET)
        1  
        CAT, I've seen this idiot on TV a few times.He and RON REAGAN JR got into it on HARDBALL.GAFFNEY threw in a cheap shot saying that REGAN'S late father would not be proud of him for his political stance.I lost any respect i may have had for GAFFNEY at his point.He is nothing but a low life Far RIGHT WING NUT JOB with no credibility at all.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (November 13, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
      3  
      I never understood why it was a "problem" when we afford non-americans with the basics of human rights.

      As the article points out, if they are guilty they will go to jail, case closed.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pongotwistleton (November 13, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
      1 3
      It's a smart move to try all these cretins in open court, to the extent that's possible. That way the deplorable religion of islam will be put on display to the attentive public by the very testimony of those who follow the pedophile, warmongering, prophet. Giving these faithful a platform to proclaim their religious beliefs will undermine the claims of all of the apologists who steadfastly tell us that islam is a religion of tolerance and peace. Hopefully it will also result in more outspoken and well-deserved ridicule of this reactionary and troglodyte ideology. Sunlight surely is the best disinfectant.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pongotwistleton (November 13, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
      1 3
      It's a smart move to try all these cretins in open court, to the extent that's possible. That way the deplorable religion of islam will be put on display to the attentive public by the very testimony of those who follow the pedophile, warmongering, prophet. Giving these faithful a platform to proclaim their religious beliefs will undermine the claims of all of the apologists who steadfastly tell us that islam is a religion of tolerance and peace. Hopefully it will also result in more outspoken and well-deserved ridicule of this reactionary and troglodyte ideology. Sunlight surely is the best disinfectant.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (November 13, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
        2  
        Now, now. Just because someone twists the tennants of their religion, in order to justify killing innocents, doesn't make the religion itself "deplorable".
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pongotwistleton (November 13, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
            3
          Remember as well that followers of the pedophile prophet also endorse the subjugation of over half the world's population (women), the genocide of an entire race of people, death to all homosexuals and atheists, and the forced conversion and/or subjugation of people practicing any other faith.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by daranzazu (November 13, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
               
            Parts of your argument may be true, but the same thing could be said about Christianity.

            Who did Muslims commit genocide against, though? By the way, Christians have also committed lots and lots of genocide (even if you do not count Hitler who was actually a catholic).

            Would you like to start an anti-christian organization or what?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 14, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
            1  
            Well, you're not gonna get me to defend organized religion. I would just say they all seem a little crazy to me. And, I don't think over history that Islam has had a monopoly on fear of women and calls to violence.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 14, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
                 
              But, even though I have known many peaceful, religious Muslims, it is hard to argue against your overall point, pong.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 13, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
      2  
      Well GOD FORBID, anyone gets 'lawyered up' . .

      Obviously Gaffney has never heard about our enchanting SUPERMAX PRISONS with a 24/7 lockup that presently house convicted WTC terrorists!!

      IGNORANCE IS BLISS . .
      Report Abuse
      • Author by freeberd (November 13, 2009 5:01 pm ET)
           
        We all have to learn how to attack conservatives when they say things like this. Remember, they dont actually believe what they say, they believe they are better at saying it, because liberals are usually stuck in paralysis by analysis mode, whereas conservatives have no problem with logical inconsistencies and evidentiary holes that i could drive a truck through.

        The way to attack a conservative who says "its a mistake to prosecute terrorists because they will go to jail, where they can recruit" is to say "you must hate prison guards and the people who become prison guards I am outraged that you think so little of our nation's prison system to bludgeon it like this! I challenge you to apologize to our nation's 'Boldest' and recant your position! You must think they are doing a terrible job, right? Why is it that every time a prison official tries to do his job you try and cut him down with your defeatist attitude and baseless attack on the AMERICAN correctional system". Or claim they hate the steel industry that make the prison bars (which hurts the economy). or just say, you lie! You know he cant back up what he says anyway.

        The point is, it doesnt matter, you cant have a fair fight with a conservative because they are not interested int he truth. they are interested in power. and they are damn good at it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by platanoman3029 (November 14, 2009 4:14 am ET)
      1  
      KSM has been custody in Gitmo for 6years. And that's justice? These people are diluted.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jcamp (November 14, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
         
      I have seen Gaffney a number of times on Hardball, and he even out-interrupts Chris Matthews, something I had thought impossible. Mostly he repeats all the talking points of the Bush administration, even to the point of insisting Iraq was involved in 9-11. After that, I tended to disregard his views.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (November 15, 2009 8:50 am ET)
      1 2
      this is the biggest loser for the democrats. holder just sold out 50 plus democratic senators. the senators voted to not bring gitmo detainees to u.s. soil. i have never been this upset by a political decision in my life. i will remember where i was the day i heard he was moving the 911 suspects to new york, cause that's the day the democrats lost congress. security is a winning issue, and don't doubt for a moment this will be exploited. this is an issue that could save sarah palin, and make her look appealing. it also makes the white house look confused. the press conference is the day obama leaves for a trip to asia??? this is bad bad bad. it effectively killed health care as well. it has emboldened republicans and conservative democrats in their resolve. most of the battles between israel and the palestinians are over prisoners!!! obama and holder just created a winning security issue for palin,fox news and the republican party. you couple that with unemployment and this is a disaster. say goodbye to any major democratic legislation, its over. thanks a lot holder
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Paisano (November 15, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
         
      Can you imagine the news media allowing the republicans to create a position that is blatantly ANTI-FREEDOM and not call them on it! ... Actually I can! The American people deserve justice! The republicans who failed to bring these people to justice for 8 years now and are the new "anti prosecution of terrorists who committed 9/11 republicans" Need to explain WHY......Let me guess... Mr. Cheney was on the phone this weekend! As Vince Lombardi says..."WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON AROUND HERE"??? This is the MOST ANTI-FREEDOM position I have ever heard!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.