About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Major retailers reportedly selling Palin's Going Rogue below cost

November 16, 2009 10:21 pm ET — 74 Comments

Sarah Palin's memoir Going Rogue: An American Life has garnered attention in part because of the number of copies sold before publication. But the book has been offered at below-cost prices from major online retailers, and Newsmax has used the book as a loss leader to promote its magazine, potentially inflating the book's sales.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Amazon, Walmart.com, Target.com in price war over book

Walmart.com dropped price from list price of $28.99 to $10, then to $9 and below as other retailers matched it. On October 15, Walmart.com began offering preorders of Going Rogue, along with nine other new book releases, for $10. After Amazon.com reportedly matched the price, Walmart.com "str[uck] back, slashing its prices to $9" [AOL Daily Finance, 10/16/09]. Amazon also dropped its price to $9 [Buzzflash.com, 10/19/09]. Target.com joined in the price war, prompting Walmart.com to drop its price further [The New Yorker, 11/9/09]. By November 5, Walmart.com was selling the book for $8.98, Target.com was selling it for $8.99, and Amazon was selling it for $9. The respective retailers were still selling the book at those prices as of November 16. All three retailers give the book's list price as $28.99. Screen shots of the November 5 prices are below:

amazon

walmart

target

Newsmax offering book for $4.97, or free, as promotion for magazine

Newsmax ties book offer to its magazine. As early as October 2, according to a Newsmax email sent to its mailing list, the right-wing website offered Going Rogue for $8.95 along with four free issues of Newsmax magazine, a price later dropped to $4.97. The offer links to a page on the Newsmax website explaining that there is a $5.95 shipping and handling charge for the book, and if the subscriber fails to cancel the magazine after the free subscription runs out, the "subscription will renew automatically at the low annual price of $39.95 by charging [your] credit card or [your] checking account." Newsmax also offered Going Rogue for free with the purchase of a $49.95 one-year subscription to Newsmax magazine. Additionally, Newsmax has promoted its Going Rogue deal in commercials on Fox News. From a Newsmax commercial appearing during the November 5 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk:

ANNOUNCER: Sarah Palin has electrified America. Her new book, Going Rogue, is already a runaway best-seller, and it's not even in stores yet. Now, Newsmax.com has an incredible offer for you. You can receive Sarah Palin's new book for just $4.97, a savings of $24 off the cover price. Plus, you'll get four months of the award-winning Newsmax magazine absolutely free. This special offer won't last, so call 800-NEWSMAX today.

Book reportedly being sold below cost

Selling below cost is part of "loss-leader" strategy. AOL Daily Finance reported that "Publishers ordinarily offer current titles to retailers at a discount of between 40% and 50%. A bookstore spends up to $12.50 to sell a $25 hardcover, which it buys directly from the publisher or through distributors like Ingram or Baker & Taylor" [AOL Daily Finance, 11/4/09]. As a result of the current online price war, The New Yorker stated, "Amazon and Wal-Mart are surely losing money every time they sell one of the discounted titles. The more they sell, the less they make." The New Yorker continued:

Amazon and Wal-Mart hardly seem reckless, though. So why did they go to war? The answer is that they didn't, really. Sure, Wal-Mart is making a statement that it's a player in the online world, but the real goal of this conflict isn't to lure readers away from Amazon, and it isn't to get people to buy one of those ten books. It's to lure them online, away from big booksellers and other retailers, and then sell them other stuff. Usually, price wars wreak havoc because they erode the pricing power of an entire business. But, because this price war involves just ten items, its impact on revenue will be small, and outweighed by the positive effects of all the publicity. (It has garnered publicity because it involves books. A big banana price war has been raging in Britain, but you probably haven't heard about it.) It's textbook loss-leader economics. [The New Yorker, 11/9/09]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 16, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
      13 4
      It should be worth $0.02. That's all she put in, right?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 16, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
      8 3
      It should be worth $0.02. That's all she put in, right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (November 16, 2009 11:40 pm ET)
        15  
        I got a copy today for .65 cents at the dollar store.

        I considered it a pretty reasonable cost for a roll of toilet paper.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by darkmass (November 17, 2009 8:26 pm ET)
             
          That's fine, if the printer used the kind of ink that doesn't rub off.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (November 17, 2009 12:08 am ET)
      14  
      For about $9 I can get 12,000 sheets of ScotTissue. Let me know when Sarah can compete with that and I will be happy to put her hard work to good use.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeffro (November 17, 2009 2:41 am ET)
        7  
        Enough of the Toilet humor, Gang. What's very apparent is the Ingenious Marketing at Amazon! Twenty bucks PLUS shipping For the Fox Groupies (FG's). Choice of Audio Book(Reading challenged FD's) or Large Print Paperback(Elderly LIV's) Perfect.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by oldmaninblackforest (November 17, 2009 10:27 am ET)
          13
        Such an open mind. what a twit... pathetic
        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (November 17, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
          4  
          Wow, just a suggestion, but my kids tell me that writing "hey jerkface" is much more devastating. Try that next time. I promise the other conservatives will start calling you "professor".
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (November 17, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
          2  
          Let's be fair, she had enough exposure during the campaign and after to provide people with a significant amount of material by which to come to a conclusion about her. Mocking her for the twit that she certainly seems to be does not demonstrate a lack of an open mind.

          On the other hand, lashing out against such a person, for no apparent reason other than Palin being on your team, does demonstrate a lack of objectivity.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 17, 2009 8:09 am ET)
      6  
      DAMN YOU AMAZON!!!!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 17, 2009 8:10 am ET)
      6  
      DAMN YOU AMAZON!!!!!!!!!

      They just jacked up the price to $14.50.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 17, 2009 8:59 am ET)
        3  
        Well, they needed a price that was higher than the IQ of the people who wanted to buy it. $13.99 didn't quite cut it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by woody357 (November 17, 2009 9:02 am ET)
      5  
      But wait there's more, If you order now we will throw in a second copy for free just pay seperate shipping and handling. They make a great xmas gift or if the door on your trailer is broken this magnificent 5 chapter book makes a great door stop or chock blocks for that car on your lawn that just keeps rolling away in the night. But you have to order in the next 5 minutes or we will be forced to offer you an extra book as punishment. call 1-877-u-betcha (877-823-8242) operators are rogue-ing by.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 17, 2009 10:17 am ET)
      4 10
      "Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."

      Ok.

      Thanks for monitoring this, although I can go to lots of web sites to view the performance of this book.

      The analysis on this issue is HALF. The other HALF of this analysis would be to compare and contrast this to other high-performing books...were the same tactics being used? That answer is YES...so this is not some sort of epiphany.

      Nothing to correct, either. In fact, it would be reasonable to note the LOGIC that if this book wasn't popular, then it wouldn't be such a "loss leader" tool! Why does my Kroger flyer (a large grocery store chain in case you don't know) have a front-page color advertisement for the latest Dan Brown book, hardcover for only $10??? BECAUSE THEY WANT PEOPLE TO BUY GROCERIES AND PEOPLE WANT DAN BROWN BOOKS.

      No monitoring, analyzing or correcting needed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (November 17, 2009 11:17 am ET)
        9  
        The point is to put into perspective the hardcover sales figures. They're giving the book away. So when the conservative media trumpet the sales numbers, it's important to be aware of the circumstances of those sales. This piece is perfectly appropriate, and in keeping with Media Matters' mission statement.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 17, 2009 11:36 am ET)
            9
          No it's not, because it provides ZERO point of reference on whether this happens to ALL popular authors/books.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jr2kewl (November 17, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
               
            I would agree if political advocacy groups or talking-head opinion providers were using the sales of The Lost Symbol or The Help to promote an agenda or claim some sort of mandate via book sales. What Media Matters is doing is pointing out the potential for that sort of misrepresentation. It's especially important in light of very heavy promotion of the book through unusual distribution channels and as tie-ins with other sales pitches. There will be no way to know what the actual sales potential of the book would have been without the NewsMax give-away or the loss-leader pricing. It would be no different from Greenpeace or Sierra Club promoting Our Choice by Al Gore then claiming that the huge numbers sold mean agreement with theiragends. But you can be certain that conservative pundits and faux-news outlets such as NewsMax and Fox News will trumpet the sales of Going Rogue to claim some sort of popular support for whatever talking points they're promoting that day. Just be skeptical. Take whatever anyone says about any of the books with a huge grain of salt.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by helpcomputer (November 17, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
               
            1. Media Matters is reporting on it in part BECAUSE it's so unusual. Walmart and Amazon are not in the habit of losing money on popular items. The article quotes AOL Finance when pointing out that retailers typically buy hardcovers for ~$12.50. But Amazon, Walmart and Newsmax are selling it for much less than that.

            2. The methods of selling Palin's books are relevant because the sales record is certain to enter any media dialogue about Sarah Palin, the 2012 race, the audience for conservative media, etc. How those numbers got to be there is an important caveat to any of those discussions, and thus part of Media Matters' mission.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by chazmanr (November 17, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
               
            Sorry Dex, I'm with "eyes" on this one. My guess is it will be less than a week before Limbag or one of his ilk is using the sales of this book to "demonstrate" how popular SP and the conservative movement are.

            If I didn't know that SP would benefit financially from it, I would buy a copy @ $9 for amusement purposes (gag gifts, some light fiction reading, etc). I suspect others might do the same.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 17, 2009 10:59 pm ET)
               
            We're not talking about popular authors, we're talking about Sarah Palin, who didn't write the book, and probably hasn't even read it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (November 18, 2009 11:14 am ET)
            1  
            Prove that it "happens to ALL popular authors/books".
            Report Abuse
      • Author by terrapin53 (November 17, 2009 11:51 am ET)
        1 8
        I agree. I think this is out of scope for MMFA. Book reviews is not what this site should be about. If the media starts reporting things in her book as fact, then come back showing how they are wrong. All the polls show that Palin is a non-factor (NY-23 anyone?). My concern is misreporting from the meida, not what is in some partisan right wing book.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by roooth (November 17, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
           
        Actually, part of the reason I suspect MM is tracking Palin's book for is to track the sales claims of ultra-conservative publishers, like Regent, or Worldnetdaily who want to claim undeserved best seller status for the right-wing crap they churn out.

        The truth is these really aren't Best Sellers in the traditional sense of lots of people buying them who really want to rwad them. They are best sellers only i,n the sense that there have been huge upfront orders for them - giving the illusion that lots of people really want to read them when that is not true. It is very rich ultra right wingers forking up the big bucks to sway public opinion.

        Once the sales numbers have been jacked up artificially, and the Right Wing author, (Ann Coulter, Jerome Corsi, Carrie Prejean, etc.), gets to hit the talk show circuit as a "best selling author", the sales fiction rapidly disintegrates into the reality of all those unwanted books being dumped into discount bins and online gift offers.

        The point is that Palin has not really written a best seller. The sales numbers do not reflect an accurate number of people who really care what she writes; it only reflects the willingness of the extreme right-wing to prop up her numbers with their own money. If libraries all over the country weren't buying her book, sales would be even more paltry.

        All these ultra right-wing authors would never make any list at all if it weren't for the Richard Mellon Schiaffes and Rupert Murdochs who fund them.

        Sad but true.

        In a couple of weeks, they won't be able to give her book away. And that will still be more than she deserves, considering the upfront money she got and the free publicity she continues to get.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (November 17, 2009 10:18 am ET)
      2 11
      Oh those nasty people...engaging in capitalism...competition in private industry driving prices down...benefiting the American consumer...shameless.

      -- price wars wreak havoc because they erode the pricing power of an entire business -- New Yorker

      That's why we should get the federal and state govts. out of the business of telling us what kind of health insurance we must buy and who we can buy it from.

      In the world of govt. bureaucracy no one would be able to pay less than $25-30 for Palin's book and we would only have the choice of a couple of sellers.

      A way to lower healthcare insurance costs is to do exactly what the New Yorker and mmfa rail against...letting private industry compete for our business.

      After all, in the words of the New Yorker that were trumpeted by mmfa...this competition will "erode the pricing power of an entire business"...can you say lower healthcare insurance rates?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 17, 2009 10:34 am ET)
        1 6
        That's why I think we should have expanded medicare and medicare-for-all if there is a clear & present danger of bankruptcy because of medical bills expenses, and then a LOT of deregulation for everyone else. Hospitals/Doctors facing a choice between giving insurers a fair billing price for their practices OR having the gov dictate the reimbursement will choose the former every time.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by trelan1701 (November 17, 2009 11:15 am ET)
             
          Let me paint a very clear picture for wesley and dex here:

          Let's deregulate the medical insurance industry and let them do the free market thing. Hell, we'll even let them compete across state lines! All the competition drives prices lower and quality of service higher! Incredible!

          But then the competition takes it's toll and companies start to fail. Mergers and take overs occur. This is a primary law of free market economics. Don't bother to dispute it.

          Now, there are only a dozen insurance companies left. Maybe less. In the whole country. They wield power, money and influence that today's insurance companies can only dream about.

          Suddenly, service starts to decline and premiums go back up because the lack of real competition is gone pretty much forever. Whoops! "pre-existing conditions" are everywhere!

          "We should regulate this!" people cry! Too late. The insurance lobby is unassailable now.

          Congratulations wesley and dex. Your short sighted "the free market fixes everything!" approach has led to a national disaster.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 18, 2009 11:01 am ET)
             
          "Hospitals/Doctors facing a choice between giving insurers a fair billing price for their practices OR having the gov dictate the reimbursement will choose the former every time." - dex

          That is simply not true, Dex. Surely not with the physicians that I know. They would much rather deal with Medicare reimbursments than with insurance reimbursements. Every doctors' office has at least a couple of women dedicated to doing nothing but going back and forth with insurance companies to see what they will or will not cover.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (November 17, 2009 11:37 am ET)
        8  
        Health care and books are not comparable industries. Book-sellers operate in a highly competitive market. Health insurance companies operate in a highly regulated, monopolized market. The "pricing power" of health insurance companies is massive. They make more profit on the dollar than casinos are legally allowed, and their overhead costs are astronomical compared to your dreaded government bureaucracies that serve the same purpose.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (November 17, 2009 11:46 am ET)
          1 11
          -- Book-sellers operate in a highly competitive market. Health insurance companies operate in a highly regulated, monopolized market. --

          Boy, you sure swerved into the truth with that comment...unwittingly making the case for promoting competition between insurance companies instead of the failed case of a "highly regulated, monopolized market".

          One can often find himself in the deep end of the pool when relying on democrat talking points as a substitute for cognitive thinking.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by all your eyes (November 17, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
            7 1
            Talking points over cognition? Pot, kettle.

            If you ever take macroeconomics, you'll learn a thing or two about how capitalism actually works.

            Many industries are not purely competitive. There is a scale between complete monopolization, and complete competition.

            Health insurance, for a variety of reasons, cannot exist in a purely competitive market. There are significant barriers to entry in the health insurance market, i.e. you need a large amount of capital to start an insurance company. And like other public-service-for-profit industries, it is essential that our democratic institutions monitor and regulate their behavior to ensure that the public interest is reasonably well served. This is also true of public utilities, for example.

            This is why we have a government, to make sure WE THE PEOPLE aren't getting screwed. Unfortunately, many of our elected representatives represent corporate interests before the public interest.

            You seem to support that model, that of a government by, for, and of the corporations. The people have rejected that model. You lose.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by gs-425 (November 17, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
                5
              And what would you consider mandating insurance companies to offer policies in certain areas and not others and then minimize the number of companies that compete against each other....competition?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by all your eyes (November 17, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
                6  
                What are you talking about? Babbling incoherently does not a good argument make.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Tiredog (November 17, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
            3  
            "Competition" wouldn't be a bad thing...if the companies competing with each other weren't in collusion to keep prices up.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 17, 2009 11:43 am ET)
        9 1
        Bravo, Wesley, this one goes straight into your Hall of Fame.

        Comparing health care to a pamphlet co-written by a washed-up cult leader in order to explain the free market. I give it two barely-opposable thumbs up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (November 17, 2009 11:57 am ET)
          1 8
          Thanks colonel.

          My apologies for dumbing down the analogy to explain the free market system...and offending the sensibilities of liberal brainiacs.

          Please feel free to skip those kind of dumbed down analogies in the future...they are meant for those duped by mmfa and liberal advocates...not for the real deep thinkers like yourself.

          Now I've got to get back to finishing that new wing for my hall of fame.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Tiredog (November 17, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
            4  
            "My apologies for dumbing down the analogy to explain the free market system...and offending the sensibilities of liberal brainiacs."

            Actually, it's still too intelligent for most reichwingers to understand...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 18, 2009 11:05 am ET)
               
            Well, you got the dumbing down part right. The problem is you seem to lack an understanding of the economic system at all. There is no comparison between selling health insurance and selling books. Find me an economist who says otherwise and I will show you an economist who should not be teaching economics. This is really basic stuff and we should be beyond it as educated adults.

            There is no true market price for healthcare. If there is, then there would never be universal coverage. A market price dictates that not everyone will be able to afford the product. That's kind of how a market price works. So, in a free market system there will never be universal coverage. In fact, the free market would deny care to those who cannot afford it. That's fine if that is your argument, but just have the courage to make that argument. I do not think the American people are with you on it.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (November 17, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
        6  
        ...letting private industry compete for our business.

        You mean to say private industry hasn't been competing for our business?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (November 17, 2009 12:45 pm ET)
            9
          That's exactly what I meant to say.

          The current competition is miniscule...only a few competitors in each state...regulated by the states.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by all your eyes (November 17, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
            10  
            There's a good reason why there is little competition. I can't just go start up a health insurance company. But if I could, I could basically charge whatever I want for my services, because people have no option but to pay it. You would perpetuate that business model, of holding the country hostage to corporate profits. If you want competition in the health insurance market, the only player in the game that can affect change that will benefit consumers is the government. Only the government has the resources to enter the health insurance market on a national level, realize economies of scale, minimize overhead costs (governmnent-run health care bureaucracies (feel the burn) operate more efficiently than privately run health care companies), and guarantee access for the uninsured.

            Private health insurers will have newfound incentives to streamline their administrative operations, provide better services and control premiums if they intend to retain and increase their rolls. They can still make a profit, but they will have to run a tighter ship. See, competition DOES help everyone. But for the insurance companies, who are dead set against having to share the market with an honest broker.

            You lose again.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 18, 2009 11:10 am ET)
              1  
              Correct, all your eyes. The demand curve is flat with healthcare. If you need a heart transplant, you cannot opt for a baboon's heart to get you by. That is an extreme example, but I think it proves the point. Also, there will never be a true market price AND universal coverage. The free market would deny care to those who cannot afford it. If you have any money, there is no amount you would not pay to keep yourself or a loved one alive. It's just not the same thing as selling widgets. Also, this is not "brainiac" stuff. This is really basic macroeconomics.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (November 17, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
            4  
            I thought that as well. According to my doctor's office, that is not the case. My doctor deals with over 200 health insurers. This is a huge headache for their billing department, though. Three young ladies working full time chasing down insurance companies all day.

            Even if you manage to get these companies to compete for business, (of which I am doubtful), the system does not really come anywhere close to capitalism as most customers (patients) do not even know the prices and relative prices of what they are having done. It is a wacked out system that does not really have any of the features you would expect in a capitalistic society. The feedback mechanisms simply aren't there and there is no way to put them there easily.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 18, 2009 10:59 am ET)
           
        Yes, wesley, because books and healthcare are exactly the same. A basic understanding of even macroeconomics will tell you that healthcare is not widgets. There is no true market price for healthcare and there is a flat demand curve. There is no price you will not pay to keep a loved one alive. Your comparison falls flat.

        Having said that, when it comes to Palin and her book I have to say...WHO CARES!? Come on, Media Matters. Is she really that important at this point? She is an opinionated blogger and nothing else. If you are interested in quitting your job or losing an election, you should consult her. Otherwise, she is becoming increasingly irrelevant. I can take a few stories a week on her. But a day? Too much for me.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (November 17, 2009 10:59 am ET)
      7 2
      MMFA is preaching to the choir here. We all know how conservatives sell their book; in bulk and cheap. We also know Palin is a ditz. She has followers though that think she is the second coming and nothing said or written about her will change that. She will do the softball interviews and any dumb answers will get editted out. However, it is only time until she implodes. I went to her Facebook page once and she had liek a million follwoers on there. However, there were over a million anti Palin people on Facebook also. She has her little clique and is going to make her money. Prgressives do not need to rip her part. She will do that on her own and the moderate republicans will do it also. I have faith in her. :)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MaineiacMan (November 17, 2009 11:06 am ET)
        8
      Cool, even more reason to grab a copy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lovethatmedia (November 17, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
         
      Borders has the Palin. . . book at 50% off, approximately $14.00. So many trees felled for this bimbo to have a forum and co-authored by a wing nut.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Icanread (November 17, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
         
      Well, I wanted to check media matters credibility so I went to the Amazon website and fund you lied. (.99 is for the kindle edition and the book is actually selling for almost $15, no different than most books. How many people actually buy a book at cover price? The price is just a fiction to get people to think they are getting a bargain. Its sad that Media matters hatred cause them to lie. Good going, you now have no credibility for the truth or your poor research.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (November 19, 2009 12:49 am ET)
           
        If you look at all of the screen captures provided by MMfA, you can plainly read that the prices are "pre-order" prices. Now look at the date you made your post and then look on the picture as to note the book's release date. Hopefully you can figure out what you did wrong from here.
        [http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/palinbook-amazon-20091105.jpg]
        Report Abuse
    • Author by djansing16067 (November 17, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
         
      The book started under thirty bucks, full retail. That's chicken feed for a new hardcover release, even from the conservative press.

      It's still funny. It'll probably be priced at about its BTU value as furnace fuel by the New Year. Meanwhile, it ought to be good a a good cheap gag gift this holiday season.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Martha (November 17, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
      6  
      Palin is doing her "best" to promote this "book", from her Facebook page today:

      Sarah Palin uses little Trig to deflect criticism and to drum up interest in her Barbara Walters interview today.

      (This is stomach churning.)

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Had a great conversation today with Barbara Walters regarding America’s special needs community.

      (Completely transparent attempt to appeal to her audience's compassionate nature.)

      Her compassion for those who some in our society see as “less than perfect” comes from personal experience as she was so close to her sister. Barbara wrote lovingly about her sister in her #1 bestselling memoir titled, Audition.

      (This is laying it on thick even by Sarah Palin standards. Surely people are not buying this?)

      Barbara and I even attempted to interview Trig during this segment, but he was about as patient through the interview as any other one-and-a-half-year-old child!

      (What? They "attempted to interview" a 19 month old toddler with Down's Syndrome? This little boy is almost completely deaf and has virtually no ability to communicate.

      I doubt he has very many words in his vocabulary, if any, and he could not even begin to respond to even the simplest of questions!

      This is the sickest pimping of a special needs child that I have ever seen!)

      I appreciate Barbara highlighting America’s special needs community. The beautiful heart of our country shines when we embrace these precious ones. Knowing of their unconditional love and need for our embrace reminds me every day of what really matters in this world.

      - Sarah Palin
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      That entire passage made me ill to my stomach! I thought I had seen Sarah Palin at her worst, but I stand corrected. In the words of a friend of mine 'There is no bottom to how low she will go."

      http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/

      Report Abuse
      • Author by hoosier (November 17, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
          8
        Martha, I hate to break this to you but a far greater percentage people would disagree with you than not and find your description of her as 'pimping' out her Down's Syndrome child as both childish and morally repugnant.

        Seriously, you should be ashamed for writing that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jason10006 (November 17, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
      2 6
      This is beneath MM. Very beneath them. Its COMMON for bestselling books, DVDs, and CDs to be sold below cost by major retailers in order to lure shoppers into the store or to the website. I gurentee you the top-selling DVDs at Wal-Mart et al right this second are all below cost. I gurentee you the best-selling books at Target are too. This is so common its absurd for MM to even post this story.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by gs-425 (November 17, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
          6
        This is beneath MM.


        no it isn't....it's what they do.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (November 18, 2009 12:46 am ET)
             
          Well said.

          But it's hard to tell whether MMFA is being purposely dishonest or are just that ignorant when it comes to the book business.

          On policy I would say they are purposely dishonest, but they probably are genuinely stupid on business.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 18, 2009 11:18 am ET)
               
            "But it's hard to tell whether MMFA is being purposely dishonest or are just that ignorant" - Dick2012

            And, which are you, Dick?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by jpeagle21 (November 17, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
      1 9
      Regardless of the price, (although I think your analysis is rediculous) people are buying it. Even if it were free and this many people were reading it, it would say a lot about the draw of Sarah Palin. I love the fact that it drives you up the wall because Sarah Palin's book is flying off the shelves. Oprah is getting some of her highest ratings because of, guess who? There are news stories and internet write-ups around the clock regarding Palin's interviews with Oprah and Barbara Walters. I thought you said her 15 minutes were up. I thought you said she was a nobody. Love it, love it, love it!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (November 17, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
        8  
        Rediculous? Is that when you diculous a 2nd time?

        No wonder you love Palin. She's at your grade level.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by gs-425 (November 17, 2009 9:36 pm ET)
        1  
        Not to mention, even if they where giving the book away, somebody had to pay for them from the publisher/printer. Somebody is making money.

        If you can stomach the h8ters over at the Bluff Po, their "Media" page is FOX and Palin 24/7/365. How does it go "when you're taking flack, you know you're on target"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 18, 2009 11:14 am ET)
             
          I think you guys are right. Sarah Palin has shown herself to be a tremendous asset to the Republican party. What, with her winning the vice-presidency and keeping the NY-23 for you. I say keep on. Follow her through her purge of the Republican party. It's all about "conservative" purity. Even though she is not really a conservative at all. But, purge away. Enjoy the wilderness!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (November 18, 2009 11:19 am ET)
             
          "when you're taking flack, you know you're on target"
          Great conservo-logic. That means Obama is "on target" then? Or is the quote only good for self-serving purposes?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 17, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
      4  
      Dreck for sale, she's going cheap.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bigmacha (November 17, 2009 4:49 pm ET)
         
      Given the content, she should be paying us to cart it away. What is truly sad is that a lot of tress had to be sacrificed to print this pointless tome of self-aggrandizement.

      It is not like she has made a substantive contribution to humanity!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 17, 2009 9:36 pm ET)
         
      Helluva deal!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dsmith1010 (November 18, 2009 8:39 am ET)
         
      For $21 bucks at Amazon you can buy "True Compass" by Ted Kennedy, and it's worth every penny. No matter what your politics, you will be inspired by it; and no matter how much you think you know about him, you'll come away with a new perspective.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donbsea (November 18, 2009 11:04 am ET)
         
      I don't know when, or if ever Amazon was selling Going Rogue for the $8-9.00 range this article is promoting, but TODAY 11/18th/09 Going Rogue: An American Life (Hardcover) Sarah Palin (Author), Amazon.com shows a "list price" of $28.99, but the actual SELLING PRICE IS"
      (11/17/09) Price: $14.50
      & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25.
      You Save: 50% or $14.49 savings.
      In Stock. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available. Want it delivered Thursday, November 19?
      Order it in the next 8 hours and 32 minutes, and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details 17 new from $14.50 11 used from $18.17

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061939897/ref=s9_top_se_tr01?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=auto-no-results-center-1&pf_rd_r=1DHH998TH171HPTYM8K3&pf_rd_t=301&pf_rd_p=480051571&pf_rd_i=sarah%20plain%20going%20rouge
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nilsson (November 18, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
         
      Wait, is the cheaper version the one without all the lies?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by OldHill (November 18, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
         
      That's great, the more people know about her the more pathetic liberals go :) However I'm planing to get my copy for $100 to both support her cause and have my book signed by her.
      Report Abuse