About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity promotes his "Conservative Victory 2010" voting guide

November 18, 2009 3:25 pm ET — 18 Comments

Sean Hannity has repeatedly promoted "Conservative Victory 2010" -- a map on his website that is part of his project to "get people to do what I think the Republican Party should be doing, which is, you know, going back to the very simple, basic promises of conservatism." Hannity has promised to use the map to support candidates who stand on conservative principles, thus following Fox News' pattern of aggressive promotion of conservative causes.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Hannity repeatedly promoted his "Conservative Victory 2010" map as a voting guide

Hannity: "[W]e're going to ask every single candidate that's running for office where they stand on the issues." On the November 9 broadcast of The Sean Hannity Show, Hannity said: "[W]e're going to put it up on the website, Conservative Victory 2010, and we're going to be -- let -- allow you to be able to click on the states, click on the district. And we're going to ask every single candidate that's running for office where they stand on the issues of national security, fiscal responsibility, energy independence, and then you'll be able to know."

Hannity: "We've launched Conservative Victory 2010 on our website." On his November 16 radio program, Hannity described the purpose of his map:

HANNITY: We've launched Conservative Victory 2010 on our website, and it's only going to get better day by day. Yes. It's an interactive map we've put up there with every state, every district, and you -- we are putting questions to candidates and can -- and congressmen that are running for re-election. We're going to have our items for victory. We're trying to get people to do what I think the Republican Party should be doing, which is, you know, going back to the very simple, basic promises of conservatism.

You know what? To keep our nation safe, move the country towards energy independence, vow to be fiscally responsible, vow to eliminate earmarks -- you support health care reform, sure, free-market solutions to health care reform, maybe a little TORT reform in there as well -- be the party of the American dream and freedom -- just basic, simple things.

We're going to give every candidate a chance to respond, and, as they do respond, we'll be putting their responses up on the website, so by Election Day in less than a year from now, you'll be able to go to the map, find out what district you're in, and your particular congressman or woman or candidate, and where they stand on the issues.

Hannity promises to support candidates who pledge a strong conservative stance

Hannity: "[I]f they're going to be a watered-down Democrat, I wouldn't support them." Speaking with Michelle Malkin on the November 4 edition of Fox News' Hannity, Hannity explained:

HANNITY: It's very simple to me. I'm not a Republican, Michelle, I'm a conservative. Forty percent of this country is conservative. I like what Reagan said. Reagan said, what -- and by the way, he challenged Gerald Ford -- but Reagan said that, you know, no pale pastels, bold colors, it's not a third party we need, a revitalized second party: low taxes, fiscal responsibility, strong national defense, energy independence, free market solutions.

If Republicans don't support that, they're not getting my support. I will support conservative candidates that stand on those values, and I think that's the future.

[...]

HANNITY: One thing we are doing, we're putting on my website, Hannity.com, we're going to have every district -- we're calling it Conservative Victory 2010 -- we're going to have every candidate. We're going to try to get in a pledge to be fiscally responsible, strong on national defense, go for energy independence, oppose ObamaCare, and if they don't, you'll know about it. And I don't care if they're a Republican, if they're going to be a watered-down Democrat, I wouldn't support them.

Hannity: "[Y]ou can be a RINO all you want, but ... we're not going to support you." On his November 6 radio show, Hannity stated:

HANNITY: Conservative underground victory, Conservative Victory 2010 -- next week on this very program, we're going to announce our special website. And you're going to be able to go to Hannity.com, click on your state, click on your district. And we are beginning the process of finding out whether Republicans will stand on conservative principles, 'cause we -- look, if you want to be a RINO, you can be a RINO all you want, but you know what? It's not going to pay off in the end, because we're not going to support you.

Hannity's map latest example of Fox's partisan political propaganda

As Media Matters for America has previously shown, Fox News has repeatedly promoted conservative causes. A few examples of Fox's advocacy include Fox News personalities' aggressive promotion of Michele Bachmann's protest against the House health care reform bill, the network's promotion of the Tea Party Express and its producer's coaching of the crowd at the 9/12 Tea Party Rally, as well as the platform it provided to help GOP PACs raise money.

Kate Conway is an intern at Media Matters for America.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (November 18, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
      6 3
      Does Sean want to be head of the Republican Party now?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (November 18, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
        4 4
        Please, make it so. Please Please Please. Hannity as head of the RNC. What could be better for the Democrats? Maybe Beck ...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by albertsenj (November 19, 2009 12:22 am ET)
          3 3
          If he heads the RNC he'd have a health plan that provided a 'death panel' AND paid for abortions!! ;)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 19, 2009 7:11 am ET)
        3 1
        Ut oh, Limbaugh vies Hannity for head of the Republican Party, stay tuned, update at 6 and video at 11

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 18, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
      7 4
      Love this. I guess Sean and the other wingnuts are fired up from their "victory" in the NY23 race. I hope they can apply the strategy across the contry, driving out any halfway sane Republican candidates and replacing them with fruitcakes more in touch with their far right fringe cult. I support this movement 100%.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (November 18, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
      6 4
      The only thing better for the Democrats than Sean Hannity being the head of either the RNC or the Conservative party... is for either party to run Sarah Palin for president!

      Mrs. Palin is going to be the gift who keeps on giving as long as she is the front runner and/or the Cluster Fox circus keeps propping her up!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (November 18, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
        7 3
        I could easily imagine Palin going through the primary/caucus process, fall short of receiving the nomination and then refuse to endorse the republican candidate. I could easily see her holding a grudge and being critical of the nominee or even going third-party.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 18, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
      5 4
      Hopefully CONSERVATIVE VICTORY 2010 will turn into CONSERVATIVE DISASTER 2010.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (November 18, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
      4 3
      His map should be very useful. It will show us progressive who we should support - anyone who Sean Insanity opposes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RedChocobo (November 18, 2009 6:39 pm ET)
      2 1
      So, he claims to be telling conservatives who to vote for, but based on his track record can those who really want useful information expect to find anything actually based on facts? This just seems like another tactic the fringe is using to drive center Republicans out of their "tent". Even if there is "40%" he claims are conservative, they are not "Fox News-Conservative".

      Basically he is developing an excellent reference of who not to vote for.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (November 18, 2009 7:02 pm ET)
      1 3
      Hannity: "[W]e're going to ask every single candidate that's running for office where they stand on the issues."

      Gee.. what if there were a bipartisan site that did that...... with things like:

      • No one can join the Project's board without a political opposite.
      • The Project refuses financial assistance from all organizations and special interest groups that lobby or support or oppose any candidate or issue
      • the Project strictly protects its members and supporters. We never sell or provide names, addresses, or other contact information of any supporter or contributor to anyone, at any time, for any reason.
      .

      Oh, yeah, Project Vote Smart!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tom J (November 18, 2009 9:37 pm ET)
        3 2
        And also On the Issues. And guess what? Wikipedia articles on Senators and Representatives provide links to both of those and more. For example, Michele Bachmann.

        Is Sean Hannity acquainted with online research? Online news?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TheDayV (November 19, 2009 8:55 am ET)
      2 1
      The notion that Conservative "promises" are simple goes right out the window the moment he lists them off. Every one of them has complicating factors behind it. There is no simple answer to any of these "basic" questions.

      But Hannity wants his audience to think otherwise. For him, minimizing the perceivable complications of his 'plan' maximizes the acceptability of his message amongst his listeners. While it's an operational structure that's integral to every political 'sale', Hannity's use of it is blatantly oversimplifying and dishonest.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by klinchkat (November 19, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
      2 2
      "keep our nation safe, move the country towards energy independence, vow to be fiscally responsible, vow to eliminate earmarks -- you support health care reform, sure, free-market solutions to health care reform, maybe a little TORT reform in there as well -- be the party of the American dream and freedom -- just basic, simple things."

      So...you guys seriously don't want these things??
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RedChocobo (November 19, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
        3 2
        Saying is different than doing. The solutions to these problems are the things that liberals disagree with.

        Keeping the nation safe... by spying on its citizens, not okay.
        Moving towards energy independence... with drill-baby-drill, not okay.
        Vow to be fiscally responsible... lol since when?
        Free-market solutions to health care reform... GOP health care reform is status-quo, not okay.
        TORT reform... to protect the economic elite, not okay.

        We all see the problems in this country, its the solutions that we disagree with.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jimieli (November 21, 2009 7:05 am ET)
      1 1
      So they want to follow Reagan's economics.

      Talk about indoctrination......this supply side nonsense has never worked nor led to greater tax revenues to the feds.

      Even Reagan's budget director admitted it :

      But as early as August 1981, Stockman began having gnawing doubts about his budget. Computer simulations failed to project the tremendous growth he had predicted, and later he would admit to cooking the numbers (!) before selling the budget to Congress. That December, the Atlantic Monthly published an article in which Stockman made several damaging and embarrassing confessions about the entire supply-side philosophy.

      He admitted that the 1981 tax cut "was always a Trojan horse to bring down the top [tax] rate" for the wealthy. Cutting taxes for the rich had long ago been coined "trickle down economics" - and it was an unpopular concept with the middle class. "It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle down,'" Stockman told the interviewer. "So the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory."7

      The Rosy Scenario failed to materialize. The economy did not grow out of its deficits. In 1986, Washington and the rest of the nation would again be surprised when Stockman confessed all in a book entitled The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed.


      Reagan nearly tripled the debt even after instituting 7 tax increases.

      In January 1981, when Reagan declared the federal budget to be "out of control," the deficit had reached almost $74 billion, the federal debt $930 billion.

      Within two years, the deficit was $208 billion. The debt by 1988 totaled $2.6 trillion.

      In those eight years, the United States moved from being the world's largest international creditor to the largest debtor nation.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A26402-2004Jun8?language=printer

      Treasury Site where you can verify the information

      http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.