About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: Palin links nonbinding mammogram guidelines to "death panels"

November 20, 2009 2:29 pm ET — 10 Comments

On Laura Ingraham's radio show, Sarah Palin linked a task force's recent recommendations on breast cancer screenings to the widely debunked smear -- propagated by Palin -- that health care reform will include "death panels." Palin fearmongered about death panels despite the fact that the recommendations are not legally binding on health care providers or insurers.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the November 19 edition of Talk Radio Network's The Laura Ingraham Show:

INGRAHAM: What's your take?

PALIN: I think that you have been brilliant on this, because the mammogram recommendation -- this whole issue is demonstrating precisely what you've pointed out, the problem about the panels, the death panels of government bureaucrats, and I think you call it the hospice chuting, the -- but those panels of bureaucrats having more and more input into Americans' personal decisions, decisions, really, that belong between them and their doctors. And this is what rationed care is going to be about.

Undermining Palin's claims, task force recommendations not legally binding

Task force recommendations not legally binding. Contrary to Palin's claims about the mammogram recommendations, the task force recommendations are not legally binding. Moreover, the task force encouraged policymakers to include additional considerations and "individualize decision making to the specific patient or situation." In a Nightly News report on the task force recommendations, NBC chief medical correspondent Dr. Nancy Snyderman stated, "It's important to remember that these new recommendations from this independent task force are just that -- they're recommendations. They don't mandate any changes in who should get mammograms and when."

Wash. Post: Chairman states all task force members were seated under or chosen by Bush

Task force appointed under Bush. The Washington Post reported on November 18:

Ned Calonge, who chairs the 16-member panel, defended the recommendations and denied that cost or the debate over health-care reform played any role in the decision. "Cost just isn't a consideration when the task force deliberates," said Calonge, who is also the chief medical officer for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Twelve of the task force members were seated during the Bush administration, and the remaining four were chosen before President George W. Bush left office, he said.

Right-wing media have repeatedly revived debunked "death panel" claim

Fox News personalities advance Palin's "death panel" claim. In an August 7 Facebook posting, Palin claimed that under Democratic health care reform, "Obama's 'death panel' " would "decide" whether her parents or her son Trig, who has Down syndrome, were "worthy of health care." Over the following days, conservative media figures adopted Palin's "death panel" term or advanced or expressed support for her assertion -- which is based on the widely debunked claim that the House health care reform bill would require end-of-life counseling. Media Matters for America subsequently identified more than 40 instances of media reporting that these claims are false.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 20, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
      1  
      You have to give credit (in a sick way) to the GOP machine. Within the past day or two, I've seen a wingnut post a comment at this site stating his belief in the death panels. This is from somebody who visits a site that contains piles of information explaining that it's BS.

      Imagine how well the programming works on those who never expose themselves to reality at all, people who only watch Fox and listen to righty radio.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by astarteblvr (November 20, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
      1  
      These kinds of media misinformation attacks are dangerous. This is what happened in Rwanda that led to the genocide in that nation. Irresponsible radio talk show 'personalities' promulgated the notion that the Tutsi's were less than human and called them 'cockroaches' over and over again. This is so similar to what Rush and Beck and Hannity do I can only project out into the future a similar result of their work. It was close, during the last Bush administration. Many of us non-conservatives were afraid to speak out about what was happening around us because of the attack-mode tactics of those right-wing so-called 'pundits'.
      The Presidential election went a different way last year, but I don't see any slowing down of the bombastic jargon of attacks and non-ideas. Violence egged on by these babblers is just over the horizon if we don't somehow impose some restrictions on the free-flowing libel that is called by some 'News', by others, 'Entertainment'.
      To say that a scientific recommendation is tantamount to 'death panels' and somehow will force Palin to choose between her parents and her son is so ludicrous as to be laughable - if there weren't so many voters out there ready to eat it up like candy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 20, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
      1  
      THe death panels she admitted don't actually exist?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (November 20, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
      2  
      Go Sarah Go!!! The right wing loudmouths like Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, and the others love this woman. It is those guys who now run the base of the GOP. They call the shots and they will be determining the candidates in future elections. That is the best news we as moderates and liberals could ever have. I hope they nominate that vivacious bundle of brain matter. She won't pull over 40% of the vote. As I have said before, these right wing media figures are their own worst enemy. They have lusted for the power. They now have and it is only going to destroy the Republicans ability to compete in national elections. The GOP is so stupid. The patience of the nation is waning. Obama's popularity is dropping, and unfortunately they are the alternative. Moderate Republicans could sweep the mid terms, but it won't happen. The fringe right, who now controls the party, is going to insist on putting up teabaggers. Teabaggers don't appeal to moderate Americans. I love watching them go down the road of no return.

      My prediction is this: Employment numbers will rebound in 2010. Maybe not before the mid terms but it will happen. Some type of health care reform will pass and what noticeable benefits there are will encourage people. By 2011, Obama will be sitting at 55-65% approval ratings and the GOP will be shouting for Palin. It's Democratic rule for 8 to 12 years in the White House and at least 20 in Congress. Thanks Rush, Sean, Glenn, and Bill. You're the greatest.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (November 20, 2009 8:42 pm ET)
        3
      I enjoy the fact that leftys and media matters (for very little) are getting their shorts all up in twist because Palin understood the purpose of an obamacare bureacray, to create panels to decide appropriate levels of care. From her twitter in August
      The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s "death panel" so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their "level of productivity in society," whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.


      Her description of obamacare is spot on. The left wants to say this is about the end of live counseling but it is about the whole system that will be created if this goes through.

      Jim Quinn said it best when he describe obamacare/socialized medicine as 're-distribution of life', your life given to the system and on their panel's,death and otherwise,determination.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (November 20, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
        3  
        You have just crossed over into The Twilight Zone.

        How often do you need to wash your underwear living with that level of irrational fear?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (November 20, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
            2
          How so oh intelligentdesignfan?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ScienceBuff (November 20, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
            3  
            Not one single assertion of yours is based on fact. It's nothing but a grab bag of paranoid fantasies. Nothing you fear is any part of any health care reform plan and none of it will ever become reality.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by rrastro (November 20, 2009 11:33 pm ET)
        1
      Call it what you want but there will be a policy set by someone for reasons likely based on politics as to who can be treated for what and at what level of spending. Medicare does this. Medicaid does this. Private insurance does this.

      Obama has advocated a panel that would be empowered to determine 'best practices' which congress would be required to accept or deny in toto. Now I know I am cynical, but what bets that the executive branch wont put some sought after benefit to hide a raft of restrictions in each list?

      Without profit motive there is no need to grow market or improve...just like medicare.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 21, 2009 8:01 pm ET)
      1  
      Once again, these Republicans are "fear-mongering" and it is just shameful.

      Please review pgs. 1189 to 1190 Authority To Modify or Eliminate Coverage of Certain Preventive Services, and then 1146 to 1150 Community Preventive Services Task Force.

      Lastly, there is "NO" mammogram wording in the ENTIRE HealthCare Reform Bill.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Talk Radio Network
    Talk Radio Network
    Talk Radio Network
    P.O. Box 3755
    Central Point, Oregon 97502
    Phone: 541-664-8827
    Fax: 541-664-6250