About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: Wallace falsely claims health bills direct task force to decide what services "aren't covered"

November 22, 2009 3:13 pm ET — 12 Comments

On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace falsely claimed that it's a "fact" that the House and Senate health care bills direct the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to "determine what services, what tests, screening, are covered and aren't covered," and asked whether that amounts to "government rationing." In fact, the bills require insurers to implement task force recommendations in favor of specific preventive care, but they are not required to adopt those that recommend against preventive screening.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Wallace falsely claims under health bills task force "will determine what services ... aren't covered"

From the November 22 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:

SEN. DEBBIE STABENOW [D-MI]: As the only woman on this panel, let me say, first of all, I don't agree with that recommendation, and thank goodness it's not going to have any impact. It was only a recommendation. But the bigger issue here for us is the fact that what we're doing is, for the first time, making sure that women have maternity care and actually have mammograms covered. That's what's in our basic plan.

WALLACE: If I may bring Senator [Arlen] Specter [D-PA] in, because you have had a battle -- a personal battle with cancer yourself for years, sir. While the mammograms study set off a political storm and Health Secretary [Kathleen] Sebelius backed away from it, the fact is both in the House bill and in the Senate bill, it repeatedly refers to this preventative services task force and says that it will determine what services, what tests, screening, are covered and aren't covered. Isn't that going to be government rationing?

SPECTER: The legislation pending specifically provides for testing. The report made on mammograms and pap tests not binding on us in any way. The bill up -- provides for testing just as I had an MRI, which was very, very beneficial to me. Listen, Chris, the real issue here is whether we're going to have governance.

Fact: Neither Senate nor House health bills require insurers to adopt recommendations against preventive services

The Senate health care reform bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, requires insurance companies only to cover screenings that the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends, those rated as an A or B recommendation; it does not require insurers to adopt guidelines that recommend against preventive screenings:

SEC. 2713. COVERAGE OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES.

(a) IN GENERAL. -- A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall provide coverage for and shall not impose any cost sharing requirements for -

(1)   evidence-based items or services that have in effect a rating of 'A' or 'B' in the current recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force

Similarly, the House health care reform bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, requires insurance companies to cover the A or B recommendations of a new task force, the Task Force on Clinical Preventive Services, but does not require that insurers adopt recommendations against preventive services:

SEC. 3143. RESEARCH ON SUBSIDIES AND REWARDS TO ENCOURAGE WELLNESS AND HEALTHY BEHAVIORS.

[...]

(c) INCLUSION IN ESSENTIAL BENEFITS PACKAGE. -- If, on the basis of the findings of research and demonstration projects under subsection (a) or other sources consistent with section 3131, the Task Force on Clinical Preventive Services determines that a subsidy or reward meets the Task Force's standards for a grade A or B, the Secretary shall ensure that the subsidy or reward is included in the essential benefits package under section 222.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (November 22, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
      1 2
      Wallace or is it Wallick? A Proud Ukrainian Name.
      I wonder how your Ancestors would Feel if they knew how you Bent Over to Achieve your Fame?
      Chris Wallace, If i Interviewed you the first question i would ask is how Rush Limbaugh's Shoe Feels on your Tongue?
      For you are Truly a Journalistic Disgrace & A Pitiful Example for the Young.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (November 22, 2009 11:56 pm ET)
           
        I can only imagine how his father would feel if he heard much of what
        Chris has said since moving to Fox News. I am certain his dad would have plenty to say if he were still alive. Definitely, honesty in reporting has skipped Chris's generation. Poor thing, it is strange that Chris has moved so diametrically away from the honest reporting his father espoused. The truth must have skipped a generation in this instance. All we hear from Chris is the Murdock party line. Poor thing has lost his way!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleMan (November 23, 2009 4:39 am ET)
             
          You haven't heard?
          The Wallace family has bought into the newly proposed Jesus Health Care Plan. Mike Wallace has been risen from the dead and breaths today! Rejoice! It's a miracle!
          Now, nobody will need to gain access to the health care system because the Frightwingers will get us miracles instead.
          I'm sure Mike Wallace will be amused to see he has passed on. And he thought he was 91 years old!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 22, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
      1  
      Thanks, MMFA for clearing this up for me - I didn't understand what the A, B, and C catagories meant when Wallace told this falsehood today, and now I do.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TadekKorn (November 23, 2009 1:28 am ET)
      1 2
      Chris Wallace tells more lies,
      Is that really a surprise?
      For FOX what would be new
      Is a report of something true.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (November 23, 2009 7:30 am ET)
        2
      So if the goal is to control costs how can this plan include evry test everybody wants?

      Either way this bill is a complete boondoggle and it should be killed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pros2pros2940 (November 23, 2009 11:26 am ET)
        2  
        Guess you don;t read much.

        Go learn about the bill and then come back and try to post something that is specific.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rrastro (November 23, 2009 11:53 am ET)
            3
          Why not learn about insurance? Once the bill is passed(if not before in negotiations) exclusions will appear. they always do, and if there are none up front this is horrible and irresponsible underwriting.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by rrastro (November 23, 2009 11:51 am ET)
          2
        because by testing everybody illness will always be caught when it is cheaper to cure and tests dont cost a thing!

        Seriously, I cant wait to see what happens when people are tested for numerous long shots
        Report Abuse
        • Author by vhw28672478 (November 23, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
             
          The Us has wost health care in the world we need health care reformed now
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rrastro (November 24, 2009 1:43 am ET)
               
            The U S does not have the worst health care in the world. Throughout Africa, you are lucky to even live within one day of a hospital.

            As for western nations, make sure you correct for lifestyle when making comparisons
            Report Abuse
    • Author by daMamma (November 23, 2009 10:27 am ET)
         
      Chris Wallace, your dad must be so embarrassed by your lack of journalistic skills and integrity. You've totally sold out to corporate interests and wouldn't know a real fact if it jumped up to bite you in the behind.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.