About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: MacCallum, Angle ignore effective corporate tax rate to claim U.S. has the "second highest rate" in industrialized world

December 01, 2009 3:20 pm ET — 6 Comments

On Fox News, Martha MacCallum claimed that "U.S. corporations overall face an average combined tax of about 39%," adding that this was "the second highest rate among all industrialized countries." Fox News Washington correspondent Jim Angle later added that U.S. taxes "punish savings and investment more than the Europeans do in all sorts of way" and that China has "a 25% corporate tax rate, well below the U.S. rate of about 40%."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the December 1 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk:

MACCALLUM: Later this week, President Obama is going to hold a jobs summit, asking folks who actually run some of the big businesses in this country for advice. And they may want to talk to the president about the impact of corporate taxes and how U.S. taxes compare with other nations. This is an important element to companies across the country, and U.S. corporations overall face an average combined tax of about 39 percent. That is the second highest rate among all industrialized countries. It is just behind the tax rate in Japan.

[...]

ANGLE: Although U.S. income taxes are lower than Europe, we have other taxes that are higher than the Europeans as you just mentioned, and oddly enough, they punish savings and investment more than the Europeans do in all sorts of ways.

[...]

ANGLE: It's amazing. We're talking about China, of course, the world's most populous nation. Once a bastion of communism, and it now has better incentives for job creation than the U.S. does in terms of taxes. China looked at what had worked in other countries, including the U.S., and devised a tax system to encourage savings and investment. They have no tax on bank interest, no tax on capital gains on stocks listed on their exchange, and perhaps most important, they have a 25 percent corporate tax rate, well below the U.S. rate of about 40 percent. So the former communists are beating us, as some say, at our own game.

Fact: US effective corporate tax rate significantly lower than its statutory rate

As Media Matters for America has noted, according to an August 2008 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), "Statutory tax rates do not provide a complete measure of the burden that a tax system imposes on business income because many other aspects of the system, such as exemptions, deferrals, tax credits, and other forms of incentives, also determine the amount of tax a business ultimately pays on its income." In the report, the GAO estimated that "[t]he average U.S. effective tax rate on the domestic income of large corporations with positive domestic income in 2004 was an estimated 25.2 percent." Moreover, in June 2007, the Treasury Department concluded: "If the revenue from tax preferences were used to lower the corporate tax rate, the rate could be lowered from 35 percent to 27 percent while producing approximately the same revenue."

Fact: World Bank study found U.S. effective corporate lower than those of several industrialized nations, including China

In its Paying Taxes 2009 publication, based on its 2009 Doing Business report, the World Bank-International Finance Corporation estimated that the United States has a lower effective rate of current corporate tax than that of several other nations, including Germany, Canada, India, China, Brazil, Japan, and Italy. The publication also included a figure that compared effective and statutory corporate tax rates for several G8 and BRIC [Brazil, Russia, India, China] countries:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by paul8616 (December 01, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      1  
      Stylistic suggestion here: Include a summarized rebuttal in the 'teaser,' above the fold. Some of us are using RSS readers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (December 01, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
      2  
      From the looks of the graph it appears the U.S. would do well to raise taxes on corporate revenues and get this money directly into the hands of workers.

      Corporate pillaging is what got us into this current royal mess.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by caels (December 01, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
        1  
        It's unfair to pin the behavior of the financial institutions on corporations on the whole. The majority of corporations are responsible, but there is something particular perverse about finance that makes those corporations that way, for whatever reason.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (December 02, 2009 9:26 am ET)
         
      There are two additional very important facts that must be considered.

      The first is the percentage of Federal income generated by corporate vs. personal income tax. Over the past few decades there has been a significant shift in the tax burden from companies to individuals.

      Second, approximately half the corporations in the US pay no Federal income tax (per the GAO). That would certainly reduce the effective tax rate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (December 02, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
         
      Don't muddy the waters with facts about actual tax rates! It makes the conservative whiners whine even louder!

      Randy
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.