About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: Beck falsely claims no jobs are being "saved or created"

December 02, 2009 7:52 pm ET — 29 Comments

On the December 2 edition of his Fox News show, Glenn Beck falsely claimed that "jobs are not being saved or created" and that the Obama administration is "creating the make-believe 'saved or created' category" for jobs. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently estimated that the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009, which was heavily promoted by President Obama, created 1.6 million jobs, and the Bush administration repeatedly stated that its economic initiatives had "saved or created" jobs.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Beck: "[J]obs are not being saved or created"

From the December 2 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: And the bogus claim of putting people back to work? Please. We have lost 4 million jobs since this man took office. I'm not saying that it's his fault; I'm just saying let's deal with reality. That's why they're creating the make-believe "saved or created" category. I'm expecting to see flying reindeer soon.

If you or someone you know hasn't been affected by joblessness yet, it will soon become apparent that the jobs are not being saved or created -- I mean, unless they're in one of the other 57 states.

Fact: CBO estimated the stimulus created 1.6 million jobs

CBO estimated GDP increase of 1.2 percent to 3.2 percent, additional 600,000 to 1.6 million people employed due to Recovery Act. In a November report, the CBO stated:

CBO estimates that in the third quarter of calendar year 2009, an additional 600,000 to 1.6 million people were employed in the United States, and real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) was 1.2 percent to 3.2 percent higher, than would have been the case in the absence of ARRA (see Table 1). Those ranges are intended to reflect the uncertainty of such estimates and to encompass most economists' views on the effects of fiscal stimulus. [CBO's Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output as of September 2009, November 2009]

Fact: Several Bush administration officials touted initiatives in terms of jobs "saved or created"

Bush Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman: "[R]ural development programs have saved or created more than 500,000 jobs." On June 24, 2004, then-Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman stated: "We have estimated that our rural development programs have saved or created more than 500,000 jobs just since the Bush Administration took office in January of 2001." [Accessed via the Nexis database]

Veneman's replacement Mike Johanns: "[E]conomic development in rural areas ... will help save or create more than 1,800 jobs." According to a March 24, 2005, Agriculture Department news release, Mike Johanns -- who replaced Veneman as Agriculture secretary -- stated: "These funds are part of the Bush Administration's ongoing efforts to spur economic development in rural areas and will help save or create more than 1,800 jobs."

Agriculture Undersecretary Thomas C. Dorr "announced the award of $19.75 million to create or retain jobs." According to a May 7, 2007, Agriculture Department news release, then-Agriculture Undersecretary Thomas C. Dorr stated:

Agriculture Under Secretary Thomas C. Dorr today announced the award of $19.75 million to create or retain jobs at rural businesses.

"These funds will help support local economic development agencies, finance infrastructure improvements, establish low-interest revolving loan funds, and help jurisdictions implement regional business and community development plans," Dorr said. "The funding announced today is expected to save or create more than 2,300 jobs in 20 states."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (December 02, 2009 8:13 pm ET)
        2
      "Abraham Lincoln was a Horrible Public Speaker"

      Glenn Beck you got some Splaining to do?


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (December 02, 2009 8:27 pm ET)
          2
        I tried to think of a situation where i could make a statement like that.
        Where i could Besmirch a Man that gave his all for a Country divided in Combat.
        Abraham Lincoln is America's most important President.
        He Changed a Nation for the Better & caused us all to be less Reticent.

        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Hello... HELLO... Is there anybody out there? (December 02, 2009 8:31 pm ET)
        1
      Yup, "created and saved" in all those NON-EXISTENT congressional districts... hmmm... more fakery.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (December 03, 2009 10:59 pm ET)
           
        Yes, that database is not perfect. Those problems were fixed, but the issue is that businesses and municipalities are sending in that data, and if they didn't do that properly, the data didn't come out right! And the Obama Administration, when informed of the problems, fixed them.

        So, are you teed off at the businesses and municipalities for making the initial mistake, or are you mad at the Obama Administration for not leaving the mistake unfixed?

        Or are you just a troll making a troll post about an old story you're trying to resurrect?

        I choose Door # 3.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (December 02, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
      4  
      What do you expect from an ignorant, uneducated fool whose hatred for Barack Obama is so great he will make up anything to criticize him?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (December 02, 2009 8:52 pm ET)
        1  
        None of Beck, Limbaugh, RW talking radio hosts fit the description of 'ignorant, uneducated fool'. They are in it for the money. They might be uneducated but not ignorant.
        They make their money because there are enough 'ignorant, uneducated fool's out there.
        Education is the best medicine for ignorance and one these guys do not want Americans to get it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by terrapin53 (December 02, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
        3 1
        Remember, anyone with an education is a liberal, so none of these guys are educated.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jms (December 03, 2009 8:04 am ET)
        9
      Creating a new branch of the military designed to hunt down and kill anyone who says anything bad about Obama would create new jobs....but I don't think anyone would say that is necessarily a good thing. The point here is that congress and this president had an opportunity to take meaningful action in January, but they chose instead to create a big government solution. Sure their billions created jobs, but the NET EFFECT of their form of action was unemployment skyrocketing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (December 03, 2009 9:27 am ET)
        7  
        Actually, hon, the actual monthly unemployment numbers [first time filers] have been steadily DECLINING since their high earlier in the year. The total composite unemployment figure is high, but it is not "skyrocketing." That trend began under the PREVIOUS administration. Where were you and why were you not bellyaching about unemployment when it started to rise sharply in December 2007? I was screaming about it then and people like you told me that they were "still seeing full malls and full restaurants," therefore, there couldn't be a problem with unemployment.

        Spewing talking points doesn't make you knowledgeable.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jms (December 03, 2009 10:28 am ET)
            7
          Sorry pal, but where I come from a 3% rise in umemployment in the last year is skyrocketing. Yes, this trend DID begin in the previous administration. Who cares? The current administration is ostensibly the same thing as the previous administration, perhaps on steroids, with their big government programs and their wars. When will you morons realize this is not about (R)'s and (D)'s? They both want the same thing - your vote - and the good of the country be dmned.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (December 03, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
            2  
            See, we're educated, and not so partisan that we think that Democrats are perfect, but it's a clear sign that you are NOT educated and you ARE highly partisan when you claim that both sides are equivalently guilty and that both sides aren't concerned with what's good for the country as a whole. There's clear evidence that refutes what you say, and if we had ANY indication that you were interested in that evidence, we'd explain it to you. But clearly your head is too far up your butt for you to learn anything new.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jms (December 03, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
                2
              You prove that you are educated by making derogatory comments and withholding any evidence for what you claim? Wow, you are freaking brilliant!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (December 03, 2009 11:02 pm ET)
                   
                Yes, actually.

                The smartest response to a troll post is a derogatory response or two to knock down the strawmen raised and nothing else - when someone clearly indicates that they don't want to learn anything, why should I provide any evidence? If you wanted the evidence, you could find it yourself.

                Thanks for again confirming that my reply was perfectly suited to your behavior and your attitude! I knew I was right the first time, but it never hurts to have it confirmed by further troll posts!
                Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (December 03, 2009 8:30 am ET)
      1 10
      What are the jobs being created by the stimulus? The WH claims 600k jobs have been created but the article can't seem to find any or wont mention them if they are there. Excuse me for not believing the white house job link as it's less than credible. Wildly exaggerated is how the Boston Globe puts it.

      So we know that fleecing is going and Unprecedented Barry is taking credit for jobs that just aren't there.

      As the Rajun Cajun once said..."it's the economy stupid". Unprecedented B would be wise to listen to heed that advice.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (December 03, 2009 9:32 am ET)
        8  
        LOL!!!!!! Mr. Cliche.

        Where did you lift your latest slur about the president, freerepublic? I'll just bet that you are one of the folks who complained constantly about the names that GWB was called. I disagreed vehemently with the incompetence and failures of the Bush administration, not because of the letter in the () behind his name, but because of the destruction it presented for our country . . . I NEVER called him a childish name. I don't agree with a lot of Mr. Obama's actions, but I'm not going to base my opinions on something I picked up from a hate blog. He's been president for 10 months and inherited a GINORMOUS cluster-you know what from the previous administration. I'm willing to give him a little time.

        GROW UP!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (December 03, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
        2  
        So, you had to go back to early November to find an article from the Boston Globe that wasn't accurate when it was created and is highly misleading?

        The recovery.gov site has reports from businesses. If they do a sloppy job of reporting data, then the data is sloppy. It's not the Obama Administration's fault. But the administration DID do their job to try to police that data collected to remove the outliers and the incorrect data, so if some businesses did wildly exaggerate, that's been fixed for the most part. And it was only a small percentage of the overall jobs reported anyway that had any accuracy issues! But of course you leave out that tidbit - how dishonest of you to do so.

        But there are other measures of jobs created, and the recovery.gov site only captures a few of them that are directly related to stimulus funds. There are many more jobs created, and so the numbers that the White House site has are gross underestimates, actually.

        But see, you're grossly uneducated on this topic - you don't know what you're talking about, and yet you come here trying to educate us. Why do you dunces do that?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (December 03, 2009 5:27 pm ET)
        3  
        The CBO has no political axe to grind. So disbelieve them if you will. But stop doing so selectively. That's that same office that made projections in the Bush era. I didn't hear you or your ilk complaining then. In fact, the CBO was a non-issue during the Bush years, as we were a tad more concerned about the other 50 things Bush was screwing up. Isn't it nice to have a president handling things so well you have to nitpick on the CBO.

        Randy
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (December 03, 2009 9:54 am ET)
      4  
      Hey, Becky!!! Didn't YOU start a new job this year???
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (December 03, 2009 10:09 am ET)
        1  
        Yes, but his buddy Lou Dobbs got fired, so the joblessness has affected this millionaire crybaby very deeply! How dare you suggest otherwise! /snark
        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (December 03, 2009 1:31 pm ET)
            1
          Cat, just read today that CNN is losing more viewers because Lou is no longer with them. Also, I would be happy to be fired any day but yet still get a 5 mil paycheck on the way out. Sounds like a buy off to me.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (December 03, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
          2
        I have a good feeling the Stim package had anything to do with his new job, oh wait it may have. CNN would not let him expose the president as a community organizer who has never created a job in his life.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (December 05, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
             
          Of course, MarkB also still believes that there are no programs currently in existence that were instituted by FDR and that McVeigh was a Democrat and that Arabs played no part in the advancement of mathematics (even though algebra is an Arabic word). So, if guys like MarkB are screaming about what Obama is doing, it must be working.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by boulderhippy (December 03, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
         
      Most of the jobs were in the government. They would have been payed for some other way. As for the one actual job created it was worth the money.

      Stimulus = Political payoff

      P.S. MMFA censor
      All comments submitted are reviewed during normal business hours (9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Mon-Fri) and posted as soon as possible, depending on volume
      I don't consider 5 to 6 hours as soon as possible. If you don't want me to post anymore just tell me. You have my e-mail address.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (December 05, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
           
        Oh, wow. Another paranoid schizophrenic who plays the victim card at every turn. The censor works the same for everyone. The difference is, when it works on our posts, we don't pretend as if there is some grand conspiracy after us. Get over yourself!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by BBaker (December 03, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
         
      Beck is right and the proof is in the facts.

      The CBO report that you provided a link to gives the whole report. The title of the report is "Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output as of September 2009"

      The key word is Estimated... since the report states that "Such reports, however, do not provide a comprehensive estimate of the law's impact on employment in the United States."

      In fact since the government is getting the reports from the "Recipients" and the recipients are the ones reporting that 640,000 jobs were created or retained with ARRA that is the point that should be in doubt since the Unemployment rate is the highest in the past 19 years.

      Fact: North Carolina the state where I live the Unemployment rate is 10.7% compared to 19 years ago at 4.1%.

      While the government site www.recovery.gov states that the jobs saved/ or created in North Carolina was 28,073 but the unemployment rate has been climbing.

      Those are facts...

      So Beck was right... the government needs better accounting and reporting.

      In case some are wondering what "Estimated" means just take your car to a repair shop and ask for a estimate and then see what your final bill really is.

      My opinion... and just mine. The ARRA was a stop gap to stop the rapidly falling economy. Without the ARRA then the Banks would have failed and there would have been another depression and we would be in worst shape now.

      And those who wants to really fact check here are the links.
      http://www.bls.gov/
      http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency/StateSummaries/Pages/statesummary.aspx?StateCode=NC
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (December 05, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
           
        Beck is certainly not correct. No one said unemployment has not risen. The statement that you are defending is that NO JOBS were saved or created. Completely false. I see construction jobs every day on my way into the office that are from the Recovery Act. Clearly, those jobs would not be underway without the recovery. Therefore, the recovery saved those jobs. It is really pretty simple. You don't have to twist yourself into a logic pretzel the way Beck makes you do in order to defend him.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (December 03, 2009 7:21 pm ET)
      1  
      beck has to lie to make his point on the stimulus. the data doesn't back up what he's saying.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RavenRog (December 04, 2009 9:01 am ET)
         
      "Fact: CBO estimated the stimulus created 1.6 million jobs"

      Isn't that statement an oxymoron?

      If it really created THAT many jobs, why does the unemployment rate keep rising?

      At least MMFA didn't cite Recovery.gov as their source. The information there was embarassingly debunked already.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (December 05, 2009 2:44 pm ET)
           
        "If it really created THAT many jobs, why does the unemployment rate keep rising?" - RavenSymone

        Is this what is too confusing for the simple minds amongst us? Thanks for clarifying that for us. Even though jobs have been created or saved, that does not mean that there were not more jobs lost. If we lose more jobs than we create, unemployment would still go up. Is that simple enough for you?
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.